3D Thermal and Electrochemical Model for Spirally Wound ... · lithium diffusion dynamics and...
Transcript of 3D Thermal and Electrochemical Model for Spirally Wound ... · lithium diffusion dynamics and...
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.
3D Thermal and Electrochemical Model for Spirally Wound Large Format Lithium-ion Batteries
Kyu-Jin Lee*, Gi-Heon Kim, Kandler Smith
NREL/PR-5400-49795
218th ECS Meeting, Las Vegas, NVOct 14, 2010
Innovation for Our Energy Future2
Objectives of this Study
• To develop thermal and electrochemical models resolving 3 dimensional spirally wound structures of cylindrical cells.
• To understand the mechanisms and interactions between local electrochemical reactions and macroscopic heat and electron transfers.
• To develop a tool and methodology to support macroscopic designs of cylindrical Li-Ion battery cells.
Behaviors of spirally wound large format Li-Ion batteriesare affected by macroscopic designs of cells.
Innovation for Our Energy Future3
“Requirements” are usually defined in a macro-scale domain and terms
Requirements & Resolutions
Multi-Scale Physics in Li-Ion Battery
• Wide range of length and time scale physics • Design improvements required at different scales• Need for better understanding of interaction among varied scale physics
PerformanceLifeCostSafety
Innovation for Our Energy Future4
Multi-Physics InteractionComparison of two 40 Ah
flat cell designs
This cell is cycled more uniformly, can therefore use less active material ($) and
has longer life.
2 min 5C discharge
working potential working potential
transfer current generation
temperature temperature
socsoc
transfer current generation
High temperature promotes faster electrochemical reactionHigher localized reaction causes more heat generation
Larger over-potential promotes faster discharge reactionConverging current causes higher potential drop along the collectors
- Previous study
Innovation for Our Energy Future5
Charge Conservation
r
( ) Ues −−= φφη
Porous Electrode Model
( ) qTktTcp ′′′+∇⋅∇=∂∂ρ
• Pioneered by Newman group (Doyle, Fuller, and Newman 1993)
• Captures lithium diffusion dynamics and charge transfer kinetics
• Predicts current/voltage response of a battery• Provides design guide for thermodynamics, kinetics,
and transport across electrodes
eeeffDee
effss
effes
Li cTUTUjq φκφφκφφσφφ ∇⋅∇+∇⋅∇+∇⋅∇+
∂∂
+−−=′′′ ln
Charge Transfer Kinetics at Reaction Sites
Species Conservation
Energy Conservation • Difficult to resolve heat and electron current transport in large cell systems
Innovation for Our Energy Future6
Charge Conservation
r
( ) Ues −−= φφη
Porous Electrode Model
( ) qTktTcp ′′′+∇⋅∇=∂∂ρ
• Pioneered by Newman group (Doyle, Fuller, and Newman 1993)
• Captures lithium diffusion dynamics and charge transfer kinetics
• Predicts current/voltage response of a battery• Provides design guide for thermodynamics, kinetics,
and transport across electrodes
eeeffDee
effss
effes
Li cTUTUjq φκφφκφφσφφ ∇⋅∇+∇⋅∇+∇⋅∇+
∂∂
+−−=′′′ ln
Charge Transfer Kinetics at Reaction Sites
Species Conservation
Energy Conservation • Difficult to resolve heat and electron current transport in large cell systems
Innovation for Our Energy Future7
ξ1
ξ2ξ3
x1
x2x3
Ɵ1
Ɵ2Ɵ3
: particle domain dimension : electrode domain dimension :cell domain dimensionξ x
Multi-Scale Multi-Dimension (MSMD) Model
Ɵ
• Introducing separate computational domains for corresponding length scale physics
• Geometry decoupling between the domains• Using independent coordinate systems for each domain• Two-way coupling of solution variables using multi-scale model schemes
• Selectively resolve higher spatial resolution for smaller characteristic length scale physics
• Achieve high computational efficiency• Provide flexible & expandable modularized framework
Innovation for Our Energy Future8
Large Cell Design IssuesPrismatic cell Cylindrical cell
•Stacking electrodes coated on metal current collectors•Less efficient manufacturing
processes for mass production
•Rolling electrodes coated on metal current collectors•Well established manufacturing process
for small batteries•More difficulties for large cell design (cf.
tap design, heat management, etc)
Innovation for Our Energy Future9
Large Cell Design IssuesPrismatic cell Cylindrical cell
•Stacking electrodes coated on metal current collectors•Less efficient manufacturing
processes for mass production
•Rolling electrodes coated on metal current collectors•Well established manufacturing process
for small batteries•More difficulties for large cell design (cf.
tap design, heat management, etc)
Innovation for Our Energy Future10
1D spherical particle representation model
r
1D porous electrode model
Sub-model choice for spirally wound continuous tab cells
Previous Development of Wound Cell Model
X
R
2D axisymmetric cell model
Applicable to continuous tab design
continuous tab design
Extended Foil
Axisymmetric assumption
Cylindrical cell Unwinding jellyrolls
: particle domain sub-model : electrode domain sub-model :cell domain sub-model
- Previous study
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Tab-less Wound Cell Design Evaluation
Large H D[mm]: 14 H[mm]: 350 Nominal D[mm]: 50 H[mm]: 107
Large D D[mm]: 115 H[mm]: 20
40
110
90
60
50
100
80
70
120
30
27
73
60
40
33
67
53
47
80
2010 20 30 8040 50 60 9070
SOC (%)
Dis
char
ge P
ower
(kW
)
Cha
rge
Pow
er (k
W)
HPPC, BSF = 78
• Large H design has almost 10% less power capability.
10s pulse power capability comparison
X (mm)
0 20 40 60 80 1005
10152025
X (mm)
0 20 40 60 80 1005
10152025
0 20 40 60 80 1005
10152025
∆i [%]
V
T-Tavg
0 50 100 150 200 250 300468101214
0 50 100 150 200 250 300468101214
∆i [%]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300468101214
V
T-Tavg
X (mm)
0 105
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
X (mm)
0 105
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
X (mm)
0 105
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
3.318
3.32
3.322
3.324
3.326
3.328
∆i [%]VT-Tavg
9 min 5C discharge
Effects of “Aspect Ratio” of a Cylindrical Cell - Previous study
11
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Present StudyTab configuration: number & size
Current flows along the winding direction 3 dimensional spiral wound geometry
Cylindrical cell Unwinding jellyrolls
tab
tab
• 2D axisymmetric model is not applicable to a wound cell with a finite number of current tabs where lateral electric current is not negligible in current collector foils.
• Geometries and materials of electric current paths in spirally wound layer structure should be properly resolved.
12
Innovation for Our Energy Future
New Development of Cell Domain Model
13
Unit structure: Double Paired Electrodes on Single-Paired Current Collectors
Negative current collector
Positive current collectorSeparator
Winding: Alternating Radial Placement of Double Paired-Electrodes
Two electrode pairs are formed when the unit structure is wound.
Double sided anode electrode
Double sided cathode electrode
Spirally Wound Cell Model:
Outer electrode
pair
Inner electrode
pair
Outer electrode
pair
Two points with a distance of a winding cycle of outer electrode pair are matched in the wound structure
Innovation for Our Energy Future14
Spiral cell structures
Positive current collectorNegative current collector
Anode electrode
SeparatorCathode electrode
A current collector has two electrode pairs in both sides.
Alternatively layered jelly roll
Outer electrode pair
Inner electrode pair
Innovation for Our Energy Future15
Spiral cell structures
jLi,iin
φ-i
φ-i+1
φ-i-1
φ+i
φ+i+1
jLi,iout
We cannot expect uniform potential along the current collectors due to inevitable electric current in winding direction.
Non-uniform electrical potential along current collectorsNon-uniform charge transfer reaction
i+i+
i-i-
i-
Innovation for Our Energy Future16
Modeling case Diameter 40mm, inner diameter 8mm, height 100 mm form factor Positive tabs on the top side, negative tabs on the bottom side 10 Ah capacity
5C constant current dischargesocini = 90%Natural convection :
hinf = 5 W/m2KTamb = 25oC Tini = 25oC
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
X [m]
]m[
Y
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
X [m]
]m[
Y
Tab locations for 5 tab case
Negative current collector
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
X [m]
]m[
Y
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.80
0.05
0.1
X [m]
]m[
Y
Tab configuration of each electrode pairs
Positive current collector
Inner electrode pair
Outer electrode pair
Innovation for Our Energy Future
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
122124126128
17
Modeling results
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
0
0.01
0.02
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.80
0.05
0.1
122124126128
Electrochemical reaction rate
Electric potential
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
-0.02
-0.01
5 tabs in each current collector 5C discharge for 5 min
Inner electrode pair
Outer electrode pair
Positive current collector
Negative current collector
0 2 4 6 83
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
Time [min]
V out [V
]
Topview
Bottomview
- Current mainly flows in the winding direction
- High generation rate of transfer current near tabs
Innovation for Our Energy Future
0 2 4 6 825
30
35
40
45
50
Time [min]
Tem
pera
ture
[o C]
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
0.3
0.3
18
State of charge
TemperatureX [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.80
0.05
0.1
0.32
0.34
Modeling resultsInner electrode pair
Outer electrode pair
High rate discharge with a moderate heat transfer condition
Heat generation dominates temperature distribution in the system.
Temperature difference in the system is relatively small yet.
- More usage of electrode near tabs
Innovation for Our Energy Future19
Modeling results
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 825
30
35
40
45
Time [min]
T avg [o C
]
Parametric study
Cells with fewer tabs …• lower output voltage• higher average temperature
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.93
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
SOC
Vou
t [V]
2D modelTapless10 taps5 taps2 taps
2D modelcontinuous
tab 10 tabs5 tabs2 tabs
socini = 90%Natural convection :
hinf = 5 W/m2KTamb = 25oC Tini = 25oC
2 tabs
10 tabs
continuous tab
5 tabs
Different tab numbers (2,5,10 and continuous tab ) on cell performance 10 Ah capacity, 5C discharge
Innovation for Our Energy Future20
Electrochemical reaction rate comparison
- Parametric studyModeling results
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
i” [A/m2]
0.2%
2.2%
6.6%
32.2%
Δi”/ i”avg
2 tabs
5 tabs
Continuous tab
10 tabs
in the inner electrode pair at 5 min
Innovation for Our Energy Future21
- Parametric studyModeling results
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
X [m]
Y [m
]
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
0.05
0.1
-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4T-Tavg [oC]
Temperature deviation comparison
0.19oC
0.37oC
0.78oC
3.25oC
2 tabs
5 tabs
Continuous tab
10 tabs
ΔT
at 5 min
Innovation for Our Energy Future
Conclusion
22
• A Multi-Scale Multi-Dimension model was used for evaluating large format automotive cell designs by integrating micro-scale electrochemical process and macro-scale heat and electrical current transports.
• Spatial non-uniformity of battery physics, which becomes significant in large batteries, cause unexpected performance in spiral wound lithium-ion batteries.
• A macro-scale domain model based on spirally wound structures of lithium-ion batteries was developed to understand effects of tab configurations and the double sides electrodes structure.
• Spiral wound cells with more tabs would be preferable to manage cell internal heat and electron current transport, and consequently to achieve uniform electrochemical kinetics over a system.
• The spiral wound cell model can provide quantitative data in terms of finding the optimum number of tabs to battery manufacturers.
Innovation for Our Energy Future
US. Department of Energy, Vehicle Technology ProgramDave Howell, Hybrid Electric Systems Team Lead
National Renewable Energy LaboratoryAhmad Pesaran, Energy Storage Team Lead
Acknowledgments
23