3a. Making television accessible – what is in scope and out ...gmail.com Tutorial on Audio Visual...

50
© Peter Olaf Looms 2012 New Delhi, India, 14-15 March 2012 3a. Making television accessible – what is in scope and out of scope? Peter Olaf LOOMS Chairman ITU-T FG AVA [email protected] Tutorial on Audio Visual Media Accessibility (New Delhi, India, 14-15 March 2012) 1

Transcript of 3a. Making television accessible – what is in scope and out ...gmail.com Tutorial on Audio Visual...

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012New Delhi, India, 14-15 March 2012

3a. Making television accessible – what is in scope and out of scope?

Peter Olaf LOOMSChairman ITU-T FG AVA

[email protected]

Tutorial on Audio Visual Media Accessibility (New Delhi, India, 14-15 March 2012)

1

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Check list Target Groups

Value Proposition

Access Options

Proposed Approach

Work Flows & Resources

Costs

Incentives, Sanctions

Business Models

2

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Check list Target Groups

Stakeholders

Access Options

Proposed Approach

Work Flows & Resources

Costs

Incentives, Sanctions

Business Models

3

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

ContentWhat does this tutorial cover?

4

MediaApproaches for TV usabilityApproaches for TV Access services

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

OutcomesWhat will I be able to do?

5

Answer some of these questions:What does the term “media” mean?What can we do to improve TV usability?How can we improve accessibility by offering access services?

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What do we mean by media?

6

It depends on who we ask...

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What do we mean by media?

7

Media = STORAGE media

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What do we mean by media?

8

Media = RECEIVERS or DEVICES

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What do we mean by media?

9

Media = DISTRIBUTION NETWORK

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What do we mean by media?

10

Media = RECORDED WORKS

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What do we mean by media?

11

Media = Content

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Media

12

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

production& exchange

reception(decoding)

use

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 3: The need for accessible TV content

Work in pairs.Discuss the accessibility of the following 5 examples.In each case is accessibility......Need to Have?...Nice to Have?

13

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What does “TV content” mean?

14

content(“work”)

What about accessibilityhere?- Need to have?- Nice to have?

TV series

EPG

Parental guide

Emergencyalert

Advert

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 3: The need for accessible TV content

15

Content category Need to have

Nice to have

TV series

Electronic Programme GuideParental guidance screen

Emergency alert

TV advertisement

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 3: The need for accessible TV content

What are your conclusions?

What points are worth noting?

16

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What does “TV” mean?

17

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

production& exchange

reception(decoding)

use

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What does “TV” mean?

18

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

production& exchange

reception(decoding)

use

TV setComputerLap-top

SmartphoneComputer tablet

Main screen/second screen

Remote controlKeyboard

Touch interfaceSpeech recogition

Eye tracking

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What does “TV” mean?

19

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

production& exchange

reception(decoding)

use

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What does “TV” mean?

20

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

production& exchange

reception(decoding)

use

Digital TVTerrestrial

CableSatellite

Hybrid Broadcast/InternetInternetFixed lineWirelessMobile

2.5 G3 G4 G

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What does “TV” mean?

21

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

production& exchange

reception(decoding)

use

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

What does “TV” mean?

22

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

productionand exchange

reception(decoding)

use

DiscoveringSelectingWatchingEnjoying

being......aware

... informed...educated

...entertainedSharing

CritiquingMashing up

Creating

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

TV: the metaphor of a fruit machine

23

content(“work”)

distribution(transmission)

production& exchange

reception(decoding)

use

24© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

InternationalTelecommunicationUnion

#1. Focus on tv usability

Get editorial and production teamsto review their current practices

with a specialist

InternationalTelecommunicationUnion

25© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

#1. Focus on tv usability

The programme was givena make-over in 2011

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012 26

#1. Focus on tv usability

TV drama aims to be more naturalDiscuss intelligibility

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

InternationalTelecommunicationUnion

Barrier-Free Digital Television 25 May 2011 European Commission

#1. Focus on tv usability

Get editorial and production teamsto review their current practices

with a usability specialist27

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

#1. Focus on tv usability

28

CRTC tells broadcasting industry to turn down the volume on loud television commercials

OTTAWA-GATINEAU, September 13, 2011 — Today, the Canadian Radio, television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) announced that broadcasters must control the loudness of TV commercials by September 1, 2012.

If action is possible in countrieslike Canada and Belgiumwe can do it elsewhere.

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

InternationalTelecommunicationUnion

Barrier-Free Digital Television 25 May 2011 European Commission

#1. Focus on tv usability

29

Is radio the key pilar of disaster management?

What about TV and mobiles when there is a natural disaster?

Massive destruction after factory explodes

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Discuss the way in which disabilities are portrayed in the media

30

A programme for children about a boy who could live more or less like his sighted friends

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

A Janela da Alma/Window of the Soul A brazilian doc also on the Internet

31

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Usability checklists for TV programmes

32

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Usability checklists for TV programmes

33

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Usability checklists for TV programmes

34

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Usability checklists for TV programmes

35

(this is for the UK)

- ISL in India

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Usability checklists for TV programmes

36

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: TV usability

Work in groups.After each example, use the relevant checklist from Tiresia to discuss what can be done to improve TV usabilityReport back to plenum on your findings

37

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: Examples

38

Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: Examples

39

Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: Examples

40

Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: Examples

41

Use the checklists to analyse the usability of the images in the Indian version of “Who Wants to be a Millionnaire?”

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: Examples

42

You can then check the intelligibility of the audio by using the sample of this programme on YouTube!

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: TV usabilitypostscript

We can use “the Exclusion Calculator”We can use eye-tracking to see how different viewers cope with a given TV programmeWe will soon be able to simulate different kinds of viewers and identify where they have difficulty when watching TV (Dr. Pradipta Biswas, University of Cambridge).

43

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Original web pageIndian Railways Passenger Reservation Enquiry

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Visual Impairment Simulation(Early Wet Macular Degeneration + Colour Blindness)

Problem: Insufficient Fontsize for links on left hand side

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Motor Impairment Simulation(Movement time prediction for elderly user)

Problem: links are too close Users may click the wrong one.

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Design Optimization

Original Optimized

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Simulation to developbetter interfaces

Users Clusters Simulation

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Cambridge Simulator

Dr. Pradipta BiswasUniversity of Cambridge

[email protected]

© Peter Olaf Looms 2012

Activity 4: TV usability

What are your conclusions?

What points are worth noting?

50