3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
-
Upload
westseattleblog -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 1/30
S+H
#30167123811 California Ave SW STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIE
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 2/30
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 3/30
S+HW ARC
Gamu
S+H Work
Nickerson Engine
Cramer Design Consu
PACE Eng
PACE Eng
ADDRESS3811 CALIFORNIA AVE SWDPD# 3016712
PROJECT TEAMOWNERARCHITECTSTRUCTURALLANDSCAPESURVEYORCIVIL
PROJECT INFOZONINGOVERLAYSLOT SIZEFARALOWABLE FLOOR AREAPROPOSED FLOOR AREAPROPOSED UNITSPARKING STALLS
L
9,7
1
1
PROPOSALThis project involves the demolition of an existing four unitapartment building, and the construction of eight townhomeunits. The townhomes are grouped into four duplexes, twoat the front of the site (east), and two at the rear of the site
(west). The buildings are placed on the site to create a centralcourtyard, providing amenity areas and access to the units,parking, and right of way. Eight parking spaces and eight trashstorage areas are located at the rear of the site, adjacent tothe alley.
The area near the project site is characterized by a mix of usesand housing types. To the north are a variety of commercialuses, to the south are a variety of multifamily uses. AcrossCalifornia Avenue to the east is a parking lot and vacantcommercial building, although a live/work and townhomedevelopment is planned for the site. Across the alley to thewest is a single family zone.
The project goals are as follows:1. To provide eight well designed and well constructed
townhome units for the growing West Seattle neighborhood.2. To provide buildings and uses that positively contribute to
the streetscape of California Avenue.3. To maximize the development potential of the property
while supporting the city’s planning objectives andrespecting the existing community’s scale and character.
4. To meet the Built Green 4-Star standard.5. To maximize the development’s connection to its
surroundings, including views, amenity areas, and streetlevel engagement.
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 4/30
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 5/30
S+HW ARC
3811
SW Charlestow n St
SW Bradf ord St
44th
AveSW
Californ
iaAVeSW
42ndAveS
W
42ndAveSW
1
2
7-Eleven
West SeattleRunner
Biojunction
Budget Cuts
H&R Block
Implant Dentisty
PENDING DEVELOPMENT
ZONING
NC1-30 - Neighborhood Commercial
LR3RC - Low-rise Residential Commercial
SF5000 - Single Family
3829 California Ave SW. 3-story apartment building2
1 3824 California Ave SW. 8, 3-story, 30 unit multi-family townhomes and live work units
500 ft
N
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 6/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
SW CALIFORNIA AVE LOOKING WEST
SW CALIFORNIA AVE LOOKING EAST
3811commercialSW Andover St
multi-family(in development)DPD # 3015371
multi-family(in development)DPD # 3013307
SW Charl
LR3 NC1-30
(across from)
multi-familymulti-family commercialmulti-family
multi-familycommercial commercial commercial commercial
NC1-30 LR3
SW A
SW Charlestown St SW Bradford St
4 5
3811
(from alley)
ALLEY LOOKING EAST
3811
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 7/30
S+HW ARC
EXISTING CONDITIONSThe site is located on the west side of California Avbetween SW Charlestown Street and SW Andover Streeta 16’ alley at the rear. The site is currently occupied apartment building with four units, with one to two bedreach, built in 1927. The existing building is in a U shcourtyard conguration with parking o the alley in theThe topography is generally at, although elevated aboufeet above the sidewalk. No landscaping of note exists obut there are three large existing deciduous street trefront of the site on California Avenue. The site has accelight, air and views to the west, north, and east, while the side is more blocked by existing buildings. Immediately north is a 7-11 convenience store and gas station, to the is a townhome development of a similar scale to this proAcross the alley to the west are several single family ho
and across California Avenue to the east are a restauranparking lot. This restaurant and parking lot are plannedreplaced by a 30 unit townhome and live/work developm
1
3
2
4
5
1 2 3
pg.4
pg.4
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 8/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
NEARBY PRECEDENTSComparable multifamily projects feature similar architecturalcharacteristics such as massing and materials. Dynamicfacades serve to express individual units and reinforce theneighborhood’s pedestrian scale.
SW Charlestow n St
SW Andover St
SW Spokane St
4 5
t h A v e S W
4 4 t h
A v e S W
CaliforniaAve
SW
4 2 n d A v e
S W
4 1 s t A v e S W
i i l School
3811
3829 California Ave SW
3430 California Ave SW
3435 Californ4042 California Ave SW
1
2
3 4
1
2
4
3
150 ft
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 9/30
S+HW ARC
CONCEPT >
VIEW FROM CALIFORNIA AVE
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 10/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
AERIAL VIEWS
northeastnorthwest
southeastsouthwest
C A L I F
O R N I
A A V E
S W
C A L I F O
R N I A A V E S W
C A L I F O R N I A A V E S W
A L L E Y
A L L E Y
C A L I F O
R N I A
A V E
S W
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 11/30
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 12/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
BENCH
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
BENCH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATH
B A T H
B A T H
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING/DINING
LIVING/DINING
LIVING/DINING
LIVING/DINING
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 13/30
S+HW ARC
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BATHKITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
LIVING/DINING
LIVING/DINING
LIVING/DINING
LIVING/DINING
BATH
BATH
BATH
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 14/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
LEVEL 03 FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
MASTERBEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
C L O S E T
C L O S E T
C L O S E T
C L O S E T
C L O S E T
C L O S E T
C L O S E T
C L O S E T
B A T H
B A T H
B A T H
B A T H
B A T H
B A T H
B A T H
B A T H
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 15/30
S+HW ARC
ROOF PLANSCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
ROOF DECK
ROOF DECK
ROOF DECK
ROOF DECK
ROOF DECK
ROOF DECK
ROOF DECK
ROOF DECK
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 16/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
LANDSCAPE PLANThe landscape design reinforces the site plan, enhancing theproject’s relationship to the street and serving as an amenityto the residents. The two axis of the project have paved and litpaths bordered by plantings. Where the two paths intersect asmall courtyard is formed with a central planter and specimenGinkgo tree. Paved walkways also connect each of the street
facing units to the sidewalk, re-enforcing visual unit identityand contributing to a more pedestrian friendly and attractivestreetscape. Wood fencing is added along side lot lines toprotect resident privacy and to shield neighbors from light andglare.
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 17/30
S+HW ARC
t
TRASH TRASH TRASH TRASH
TRASH TRASH TRASH TRASH
C A L I F O R N I A A V E N U E S W
P A R K I N G - P E R M E A B L E C O N C R E T E
P A R K I N G - P E R M E A B L E C O N C R E T E
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B.
H.B. H.B.
H.B. H.B.
H.B.
BENCH
EXISTING FENCE
GATE
GATE
BENCHBENCH
BENCH
18" DEC.
18" DEC.
18" DEC.
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t t
t
t
t t t t
t t t t t
t
t t t
t
eeeeee
eee
eee
eeee
ee
e
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
e e e
t t
e e e
t t t n
n
n
n
p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p pt t t
t t t p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p
hy
hy
hy
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
sa
hy hya a a a
a a a a
a a a a
a a a a o osasa
sasa
hy
hy
hy
o
o
o
o
o
o hy
sa
sa
sa
sa
sa
sa
b
b b
b bb
n n n
t o osaosa
hybb
b bb
b
sa
hyhy hy hybb
b bb
b
sa o osasa
sasasao sa
n n
nn
b
STREET TREESTO REMAINPROTECT PER
DETAIL132
' '''' '
Notes:
-Seesoilamendmentdetailfor soilspecifications.
-Seebiorententionplanterdetail forbioretentionspecifications.
-Allplantingbeds toreceiveminimum3-4"of mulch.
DT = DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT
N = PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIVE PLANT
a
b
t
ehy
n
o
p
sa
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
. .
IL
T
T 1" .
1" .
1 " .
Gallery Bench Model # 3002
Available at Ore Inc. 801.936.0499
Powder Coating Color T.B.D.
LIGHTING LEGENDTYPE FIXTURE QTY
PATH LIGHT TBD 7
S POT LI GHT TB D 5
BENCH
:
" ' "
' 1'''' '
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 18/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
VIEW FROM CALIFORNIA AVE
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 19/30
S+HW ARC
VIEW FROM ALLEY
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 20/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 395.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 385.88'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 415.88'
EL. 419.88'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
8 ' - 0 "
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHIN
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
EAST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
C A L I F O R N I A A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
UNIT 1UNIT 2
UNIT 2UNIT 3
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
A
E
H
E
E
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
C A L I F O R N I A
A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
SCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 21/30
S+HW ARC
'
"
'
"
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
. '
. '
. '
. '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. '
. '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 395.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 385.78'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 415.78'
EL. 419.78'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 " '
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 385.88'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 415.88'
EL. 419.88'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
UNIT 4 UNIT 3
C A L I F O R N I A A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
UNIT 4UNIT 1
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
. . '
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
. . '
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 " '
"
'
"
'
"
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 395.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
. . '
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
. . '
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 415.78'
EL. 419.78'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
C A L I F O R N I A
A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
SCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 22/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
SOUTH INTERIOR (2 & 3)
NORTH INTERIOR (1 & 4)UNIT 1UNIT 4
UNIT 3UNIT 2
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
A
E
H
E
E
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
8 ' - 0 "
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEA
EL. 395.5
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEA
EL. 405.5
LEVEL1
T.O.SLA
EL. 386.5
T.O. PLAT
EL. 413.50
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50
T.O. PARA
EL. 419.50
SCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
C A L I F O R N I A
A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
C A L I F O R N I A
A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 23/30
S+HW ARC
EAST INTERIOR (3 & 4)
WEST INTERIOR (1 & 2)
UNIT 4UNIT 3
UNIT 2UNIT 1
C A L I F O R N I A
A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
C A L I F O R N I A
A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 395.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 385.78'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 415.78'
EL. 419.78'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E
H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 " '
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 385.88'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 415.88'
EL. 419.88'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 " '
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
SCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 24/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
C A L I F O R N I A
A V E S
A L L E Y
23
4 1
SECTION BSCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
SECTION ASCALE: 1” = 10’-0”
2.5 5 10
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 395.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 385.88'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 415.88'
EL. 419.88'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
MASTERBEDROOM
LIVING/DINING
HALL
KITCHEN
BEDROOM KITCHENLIVING/DINING
BEDROOMHALL
MASTERBEDROOM
4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
"
'
" 4 ' - 0 "
P A R A P E T
8 ' - 0 "
3 0 ' - 0 " - B A S E H E I G H T L I M I T
2 ' - 0 "
4 ' - 0 "
'
"
'
"
9 ' - 0 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
.
. . '
. . '
. . '
. .
. . '
. .
. . '
LEVEL2
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 396.50'
LEVEL3
T.O. SHEATHING
EL. 405.50'
LEVEL1
T.O.SLAB
EL. 386.50'
T.O. PLATE
EL. 413.50'
AVG. GRADE
EL. 386.00'
HEIGHTLIMIT
EL. 416.00'
EL. 420.00'
T.O. DECK
EL. 415.50'
T.O. PARAPET
EL. 419.50'
LIVING/DINING
BEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
LIVING/DINING
BEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
LIVING/DINING
BEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
LIVING/DINING
BEDROOM
MASTERBEDROOM
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 25/30
S+HW ARC
MATERIAstanding seam vertical
painted gray ber cement board pwhite vinyl win
painted white ber cement proo
cedar screcast in place concrete
concrete p
ABC
DEFGH
A
D
B E F
G HC
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 26/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
AMENITY AREA REQUIRED
LOT AREA: 9,714 SF
9,714 SF x 0.25 = 2428.5 SF TOTAL AMENITY AREA REQUIRED
2428.5 x 0.5 = 1214.3 SF REQUIRED AT GROUND LEVEL
AMENITY AREA PROVIDED:
GROUND LEVEL:
COMMON AMENITY AREA: 1270.7 SF
PRIVATE AMENITY AREA: 852.6 SF
TOTAL AMENITY AREA AT GROUND LEVEL:2123.3 SF (1214.3 SF REQUIRED)
ROOF DECK: 1513.6 SF
TOTAL AMENITY AREA PROVIDED:
3636.9 SF (2428.5 SF REQUIRED)
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
148.4 S
AMENI
93.5 SF
AMENI
101.7 S
AMENI
172.4 S
AMENI
1270.7
AMENI
I I
:
I I
I
I I :
:
I :
I I :
I : I
:
I I :
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
arterial route
alley way access
primary circulation
private entry
proposed south elevation
neighboring facade to south
PRIVACYSpecial consideration was taken to assure minimal overlap-ping fenestration on the southern units.
AMENITIES / CIRCULATIONThe central courtyard provides the circulation through the site,extending all the way through the site from the sidewalk tothe alley, and connecting to the building entries. Front entries
along California Avenue have direct access to and from thesidewalk. Amenity spaces are provided at ground level in thecourtyard and at entries. Roof decks are provided for all unitsfor additional amenity space, and access to light, air and views.
California AvAlley
I I
:
I I
I
I I :
:
I :
I I :
I : I
:
I I :
I
168.3 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
168.3 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
189.2 SF PRIVATE AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
189.2 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
189.2 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
189.2 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
189.2 SF PRIVATE AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
189.2 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
189.2 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
189.2 SF PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA
(ROOF DECK)
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 27/30
S+HW ARC
12:00
9:11
4:21
12:00
7:55
SUN PATH/SHADOW STUDYDEC 21st winter solstice JUNE 21st summer solstice MAR / SEPT 20th equinox
1 0 : 0
0
1 2 : 0 0
2 : 0 0
3811
winter solstice
equinox
summer solstice
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 28/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE&DESIGN
LLC
LAND USE CODE REQUIREMENTS + ADJUSTMENTSONE ADJUSTMENT IS PROPOSED:
Front Setback Reduction, from 7’ Average to 6.62’ Average (5.4% Reduction), At Northeast Building Only
RATIONALE:
The lot lines are skewed, so the front lot line is not parallel to the front face of the buildings. To keep the buildings in alignment, thetwo front buildings need dierent front setbacks. We propose a Reduced Front Setback Adjustment for the northeast building on thesite. We have shown the northeast building with a 6.62’ Average Front Setback, and the southeast building with a 7.41’ Average FrontSetback. When taken together, the buildings have a 7.01 Feet Average Front Setback, so we feel this meets the intent of the Land UseCode. If the buildings were attached, this would meet the code requirement. This adjustment allows for deeper articulation in the frontfaces of the buildings, as the articulation would be reduced in depth to allow the Front Setback to meet the letter of the Land Use Code,and therefore results in an improved project from the standpoint of the Design Guidelines. The proposed Front Setback is compliantwith the 5’ Minimum Front Setback requirement.
SMC Standard Requirement Proposed
23.45.504 Permitted and Prohibited
Uses
Residential use permitted outright. Compliant: Residential Use Proposed.
23.45.510 Floor Area Ratio Limits LR3 Townhouse: 1.3 (Built Green, Parking located at rear of lot and accessed
from alley). 9,714 SF x 1.3 = 12,628 SF Maximum FAR
Compliant: 12,600 SF FAR Proposed.
23.45.512 Density Limits LR3 Townhouse: No Limit (Built Green, Parking located at rear of lot and
accessed from alley).
Compliant: 8 Dwelling Units Proposed.
23.45.514 Structure Height Maximum 30' height limit. Compliant: 29'-6" height proposed.
23.45.518 Setbacks and
Separations
Front: 7' Average, 5' Minimum; Side: 5' Minimum; Rear: 7' Average, 5' Minimum;
Separations between structures: 10' Minimum.
Front Setback Adjustment Requested: 6.62' Average,
see diagram and text this page. All others compliant.23.45.522 Amenity Area 25% of Lot Area, 50% at Ground Level, Minimum. 9,714 SF x 25% = 2,428.5 SF
Required. 2,428.5 x 50% = 1,214.3 SF Required at Ground Level.
Compliant: 3,636.9 SF Proposed,
2,123.3 SF at Ground Level.
2 3. 45 .5 24 L an dsca ping M in im um 0 .6 Gr ee n F ac to r R eq ui re d, St re et T re es Re qu ir ed . C om pl ia nt : Gre en F ac to r 0 .6 15 Pr op osed ,
Street Trees Existing, To Remain.
23.45.527 Structure Width and
Façade Length Limits
Maximum Width: 120', Maximum Façade Length: 65% of lot line length within 15'
of lot line, 117' x 65% = 76' Maximum Façade Length.
Compliant: Structure Width 62'-8" total proposed;
Façade Length 74'-0" total proposed.
2 3. 54. 01 5 Req ui red Pa rk in g On e p ark ing s pa ce re qu ire d p er dwel li ng un it re qu ire d. Co mp li an t: 8 park ing s pa ces p rop os ed.
23.54.040 Solid Waste Storage and
Access
On e 2 'x 6' s to ra ge are a p er d wel li ng un it re qu ired . Co mp li an t: ( 8) 2 'x 6' s tora ge ar ea s proposed.
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 29/30
S+HW ARC
PRIORITY GUIDLINESCS2. URBAN PATTERN AND FORMB.2. Connection to the Street:Front entries and central pedestrian courtyard make a strong connection to the sidewalk and street. Also see PL3 below.B.3. Character of Open Space:Private open spaces between the building and the sidewalks are dened by steps, walls, and landscaping, creating privateoutdoor rooms with an appropriate buer from the sidewalk. Also see PL3, DC3 and DC4 below.D.3, D.4, D.5. Zone Transitions, Massing Choices, Respect for Adjacent Sites:Enlarged rear setback and presence of existing alley create a signicant buer between this project and the adjacentsingle family zone. Windows are located to minimize privacy impacts to the adjacent townhomes to the south. Portions ofthe side setbacks are increased to 6’ for extra space between the buildings and neighbors to the north and south.
PL1. OPEN SPACE CONNECTIVITYB.1, B.3. Pedestrian Infrastructure, Pedestrian AmenitiesCentral pedestrian courtyard and building entries connect strongly with the sidewalk, supporting pedestrian activity. Thecourtyard includes amenities such as seating, lighting, and landscaping. Signage increases the eectiveness of pedestriancirculation through the site. The central courtyard extends through the site and to the alley, creating opportunities forpedestrian circulation through the site, to and from all directions. Also see DC3 below.
PL2. WALKABILITYB.1, B.2. Eyes on the Street, Lighting for Safety:Windows and entries facing the street, pathway lighting, and entry lighting increase safety and security both on site andin the right of way.D.1. Design as Waynding:Addressing signage is provided to improve pedestrian circulation to and through the site. See the site plan on page 11.
PL3. STREET LEVEL INTERACTIONA.1, A.2, B.1, B.2, B.4. Entries, Residential Edges:Entries are recessed and protected by a canopy. The buildings are set back from the street enough for privacy and toprovide a transitional buer, yet the buildings are still close enough to the sidewalk to have a presence and connection
with the public realm. Landscaping and lighting improve the quality of the entry spaces. The site and entries are raisedabove the sidewalk, making a distinction between private and public areas, and are further buered by landscaping thatcreates a more intimate entry sequence. Seating and mailboxes in the courtyard provide opportunities for interaction.The central pedestrian courtyard creates a clear and graceful transition from the sidewalk, to the individual entries, andthrough the site. Also see DC3 below.
PL4. ACTIVE TRANSITA.1, A.2, B.1, B.2, B.3, C.1, C.2, C.3. Active Transportation:California Avenue is a primary bicycle route with bicycle sharrows, and nearby 42nd Avenue, 45th Avenue, and CharlestownStreet are secondary bicycle routes. Bicycle parking spaces are provided on site. Metro Routes 50, 55, and 128 run bothnorth and south on California Avenue. Five blocks to the south, at Alaska Street, several more routes are available. Thenearest bus stop is approximately fty feet to the north of the site, on the same side of the street and heading in thesouthbound direction, for very convenient access to transfer to other routes at Alaska Street, although Alaska Street is alsowithin convenient walking distance.
DC1. PROJECT USES AND ACTIVITIESA.1, A.2, A.4. Arrangement of Interior Uses:On the street side of the building, living areas and entries are located on the ground oor and oriented to the street. Third
oor bedrooms and roof decks are oriented to take advantage of territorial and distant views. Doors and windows opento the courtyard.B.1. Vehicular Access and Circulation:Parking is located at the rear of the site, and is accessed from the alley, minimizing impacts to the sidewalk, streetscape,pedestrians, and adjacent properties. The parking area is screened on the sides to minimize visual impacts to the neighbors.The windows of the rooms adjacent to the parking area have been raised to limit the impact on the residents.
DC2. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTA.1, A.2. Massing:The buildings are massed to create useable common and private open spaces in the negative spaces around the builRather than providing penthouses to the roof decks, the buildings have exterior stairs, minimizing height wherbuildings would be tallest. This minimizes the blockage of light and air to the neighbors as well as into the courtyardbuilding’s facades are articulated and have contrasting material changes and a varying rooine to reduce their permass.B.1, B.2, C.1, C.2, C.3, D.1, D.2. Façade Composition, Secondary Architectural Features, Scale and Texture:The facades of the buildings have been carefully arranged and articulated to create a balanced, pleasing compoRecessed planes create relief and shadow that will change at dierent times of day and year. Large windows are inc
where possible, windows are placed so as to create a visually interesting arrangement, and no facades are blank. Thearticulation, and windows break down the mass of the buildings to create a more human scale. High quality materiused at the street fronts, adding a variety of textures where the buildings are most visible and public, see DC4 belolandscape design is closely integrated with the architecture to complete the composition.E.1. Form and Function:The stepping, articulated, and repeating façades visually identify the buildings as what they are: attached, side byresidential townhomes. Each individual unit is clearly articulated and identiable.
DC3. OPEN SPACE CONCEPTA.1. Building-Open Space Relationship:The buildings are arranged to create an attractive, useable courtyard that connects the building entries and privatespaces to the sidewalk and parking areas. Roof decks are also provided for additional private amenity space and accviews. The landscaping, paving, seating, and lighting reinforce the relationship between open spaces and buildingsee PL3 above and DC4 below.B.1, B.2, B.3, B.4, C.1, C.2. Open Space Uses and Activities, Design:Private open spaces are provided for each unit at ground level and at the roof. Common open spaces in the courtyaprovided with seating and lighting for exible use. Open spaces at ground level relate nicely to the sidewalk, alley, paand entries. The quantity of amenity space provided exceeds Land Use Code requirements by 49%. The ground
open spaces are carefully landscaped with both plants and paving to create a pleasant experience when using or pthrough the site. Also see PL3 above.
DC4. EXTERIOR ELEMENTS AND FINISHESA.1, A.2. Building Materials:Exterior building materials include standing seam metal and ber cement panels, both are highly durable. Standing metal is used at the street facades, giving the buildings a clean, rened aesthetic. The composition and details materials are modern and simple, with carefully placed joint lines and clean transitions. Exterior material transitions the articulation of the building, reinforcing the architectural concept.B.1, B.2. Signage:Addressing signage is incorporated into the landscape near the sidewalk to provide clear direction to the rear unitthe site plan on page 11.C.1, C.2. Lighting:Lighting is provided at entries and along courtyard pathways, providing safety and security. All lighting is directedand/or shielded from the neighbors. Pathway lighting is integrated into the landscape, highlighting the plantinglandscape design.D.1, D.2, D.3, D.4: Trees, Landscape, and Hardscape Materials:A variety of plant species have been selected to create a varied yet harmonious landscape. Some species are dr
tolerant, some are native; all are aesthetically complimentary with each other and the context. Eleven trees of four dispecies are included in the project; they are located to highlight critical transition points in the site. Three large streetare preserved. Hardscape materials include pavers through the courtyard and to building entries, creating an intertexture and pattern along pathways.
8/10/2019 3811 California Streamlined Design Review Proposal
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3811-california-streamlined-design-review-proposal 30/30
S+HWorks ARCHITECTURE & DES