PAT SCHEMEPHASE 2

3 STEP GUIDE

MITIGATING FINANCIAL RISKS | DRIVING SUSTAINABLE ENERGYINTENSITY REDUCTIONS

Key factors notconsidered for Normalisation

Incorrect Industry

Benchmarking

Discrepancy in Target Setting

Being "unaware" can cost you. Take control.

Is there a way to mitigatethese risks in Phase 2?

Read on to know how your unit can mitigate the potentialfinancial risks?

Get an independent baselineaudit completed by November'15Step No. 2

Detailed Energy/Process Audit, GAP Analysis and Energy Efficiency/Productivity Improvement Potential.

Identify Key Performance Indicators, CriticalSuccess Factors (CSFs)/ NormalizationFactors that influence Energy PerformanceIndicators.

Flag all ways in which your process/productmix might be different to other companies inthe same sector.

Holistic GAP Analysis

Normalisation

Accurate Target Setting

Be ahead, have a project wiseimplementation plan in place by

March'16Step No. 3

Make a list of projects that would be used to cover the targets forPhase 2.Very likely that going forward the performance assessment wouldgive strong weight-age on Energy Efficiency Projects implementedand not just the overall GTG EnPIS.

Chalk out an Internal M&V plan for each of the proposed projects,get specific project baselines ready well before the implementationbegins.

No we have not got the numbering wrong!.This step for most of the companies wouldbe the 3rd one, but it needs to be right up

there!

Step No. 1

Get your #Data strategy in place! Metering, communicationsand Faceless Energy Information Management and Analytics!

There are many ways in which we can be yourpreferred partner. Best way to explore the possibilities is

to set up a call or a meeting with us!