TEACHER RESEARCH: BECOMING A RESEARCHER BY INQUIRING INTO TEACHING PRACTICES MARJOLEIN DOBBER.
3 marjolein schaddelee
-
Upload
ntlt-conference -
Category
Education
-
view
129 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 3 marjolein schaddelee
![Page 2: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Project-based learning (PBL)
- Why?- How?- What do the students think?- Outcomes and changes….
![Page 3: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why PBL?
WHY PBL?
![Page 4: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Kolmos (2010):
Improvement of skills
for students
Higher completion
and retention rates
![Page 5: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
And if we needed convincing….
• First year is the best place to start (really?)
• Staff reflection and student evaluations
• Challenges are good for you
• And … the outcome is….
(Yam & Rossini, 2010)
![Page 6: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
How do we make it work?
Planning: 5 interdisciplinary projects – 1 year – 8 papers
![Page 7: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
What do the students think?
![Page 8: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What was working well in 2012
• “being helpful & friendly it’s ideal”
• “having Friday off”
• “working in groups”
• “The feedback we get from our work is great and I can learn a lot from it”
• “The course hours are good, it gives us time to work in our groups out of class”
• “meeting with mentors is good”
• ”working with different businesses”
![Page 9: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What were the issues in 2012
• “ …we feel we have been chucked in it”
• “Be more organised”
• “ …use Moodle as a medium…”
• “keeping groups the same”
• “The disorganisation and miss-communication between management & lecturers”
• “we are getting a bit sick of one another”
• “understanding the questions”
• “stop treating us like guinea pigs”
![Page 10: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Changes for 2013
• Better preparation• Managing expectations• Modelling effective team behaviours
TEAM LEARNING
![Page 11: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Student perceptions 2013the story so far….
• “Moodle”
• “Talk us through how to answer questions”
• “helpful teachers” and “extra care”
• “having a mentor”
• “use of activity where we apply what we are learning to something”
• “less group work, more individual assignment”
• “couches, pizza”
![Page 12: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What did we learn?
• Having a committed team
• Generosity of skills and contributions
• Making decisions by consensus
• ‘Interdisciplinary’ is not an easy option
• Even a self-managing team needs a coordinator
AND THE TEAM IS STILL LEARNING….
![Page 13: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
More work to do….
• Peer assessment?
• Improvement of skills?
• Completion and retention?
• Benefits worth the costs?
![Page 14: 3 marjolein schaddelee](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081413/547eb258b4af9fe16f8b495b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
References
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75.
Kolmos, A. (2010). Premises for changing to PBL. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1-7.
Michaelsen L.K., Knight A.B. & Fink L.D. (Eds). (2004). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Smith Ducoffe, S.J., Tromley, C.L. & Tucker, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary, team-taught, undergraduate business courses: The impact of integration. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 276-294.
Thomas, J.W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/images/uploads/general/9d06758fd346969cb63653d00dca55c0.pdf
Yam, L.H.S. & Rossini, P. (2010). Implementing a project-based learning approach in an introductory property course. 16th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, January 2010.