, 1/2014

405

339.13:349.2

doi:10.5937/zrpfns48-5653

,

,

: -

. ,

, . -

-

- . -

. -

-

,

.

: , ,

I

- - , ( -

) – .1 -

–––––––––– 1 . , ,

, ,

2012. ., . 101.

, ( . 405–427)

406

, , .2

homo ludens, ( , , ) ,

, - – homo faber.3 , -

, - .4 ,

- .5 ,

.6

- -

, ,

,

, -

, . -

, -

, -

,

.7 -

,

,

. -

-

, -

. -

,

, .

, -

, -

–––––––––– 2 . , , -

, , 2001. ., . 163. 3 . , ,

, , 2013. ., . 37. 4 . 53 . 60. 2. 3. („ . “, . 98/2006) 5 . , , , 1986.

., .49. 6 . , , , 2010., . 93. 7 . , , , -

, 2012., . 203.

, 1/2014

407

.8 -

, -

-

(

).9 -

, -

.

, .

-

: -

,

. ,

, -

, -

, .

, -

, -

, -

.

, -

, .

, -

.

, o

-

.10 , -

-

.

-

, , -

: „inevitable disclosure“, „garden lea-

ve“, „non solicitation agreement“.

–––––––––– 8 . , . , ?, -

– , , 2010. ., . 5. 9 . , ,

, , 2006. ., . 16. 10 . 790. . 3. („ . “, . 29/78,

39/85, 45/89 - 57/89, „ . “, . 31/93 „ . “, . 1/2003 -

)

, ( . 405–427)

408

II

-

,

. „ ( -

) -

( ) (

) , , -

.“11

,

, -

, -

. , -

, . -

-

, -

.

, -

, , -

, -

-

.12

, ,

, .13

( : ,

,

,

)

(

, , -

–––––––––– 11 . , ,

, , 2013., . 105. 12 . , , , , 2008., . 133. 13 , ., ,

, ,

2012., . 301.

, 1/2014

409

,

, -

). -

,

, -

, -

,

. , -

-

, -

, ,

( ) -

.14 ,

-

.15

-

.16

.

,

-

(

), -

.17

1.

- -

. – -

–––––––––– 14 Ibidem, . 750. 15 . , , , ,

1986., . 154. 16 . , , , .

3/1983. . 102 17 , ., ,

, ,

2012., . 331. 332.

, ( . 405–427)

410

, -

. , -

-

, -

,

. -

know-

how, ,

. , -

.

.

,

,

.18 know-

how

, -

, -

.

, ,

, . -

, -

. ,

50% ,

. -

, .

, -

.

,

, -

. -

( -

–––––––––– 18 . Schuster, The German commercial code, Stevens and Sons, London, 1911., . 74,

http://www.archive.org/stream/germancommercial00germuoft

/germancommercial00germuoft_djvu.txt, 24.01.2014. .

, 1/2014

411

), -

. ,

,

,

.

.

-

. -

, -

, 12

. -

-

-

, -

,

-

. 50% -

, ,

-

(

, ).19

-

, -

. ,

,

, -

.20

, -

–––––––––– 19 . 74.,74 , 74b, 74c 75 Handelsgesetzbuch, Gesetz vom 10.05.1897 (RGBl. I S.

219), zuletzt geändert durch Gesetz vom 04.10.2013 (BGBl. I S. 3746) m.W.v. 10.10.2013, stand:

01.01.2014 aufgrund Gesetzes vom 28.08.2013 (BGBl. I S. 3395),

: http://dejure.org/gesetze/HGB, 24.01.2014. . 20 T. Treu, Labour Law in Italy, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2010.,

. 74.

, ( . 405–427)

412

-

. (

, -

)

. , -

,

, . -

-

( , , . . .) -

, -

. ,

, ,

-

.21 -

.

-

.22

, -

50% ( ). -

, e

.23

-

30.327€.

-

-

, ,

-

( -

) 12 .

-

-

–––––––––– 21 . 276. 30.12.2001 N 197- ,

http://www.consultant.ru/popular/tkrf/, 17.02.2014. . 22 Z. Anatolevna Gorbachëva, Labour Law in Russia, Kluwer Law International, Alphen

aan den Rijn, 2011., . 142. 23 . Kontrimas, M. Samsa, International expatriate employment handbook, Kluwer Law

International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2006, . 170

, 1/2014

413

30.327€

60.654€. 60.654€ ,

. ,

,

,

. -

-

, , -

. ,

„ “ ( -

)

, -

. -

,

, ,

, . -

12 ,

.24

,

( ,

) -

, ,

-

-

.

-

.25

2.

: ,

–––––––––– 24 R. Blanpain, Labour law in Belgium, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn,

2010., 251 252. 25 . 1. 2. . 20.

18.12.1986. ., Official journal of the European Communities No

L 382/17.

, ( . 405–427)

414

,

. ( -

) - . -

- ,

, , . - ( -

, , -

), , ,

, , .26 - , ,

.

. - , -

- . , ( -

- 27) - ,

. -

, - .28

, - .29 –

, -

–––––––––– 26 . 161. 1. 2. „ “, . 24/2005,

61/2005, 54/2009 32/2013. , , I . 190/2005 - 22/2011-26. ,

I . 187/2005 - 79/2011-58. 27 . , , , .

3/1983, . 102 28 . 161. 3. „ “, . 24/2005, 61/2005, 54/2009

32/2013, , I . 190/2005 - 22/2011-26. , I . 187/2005 -

79/2011-58. 29 . , , , vol. 53, iss.

10, 2004. . 827.

, 1/2014

415

. -

, , , . -

, - .

, , ,

. -, , .30

-

.

.31

ratio -

. -

, -

, , -

, -

. -

, ( -

)

.

, -

,

,

-

. , -

.32

–––––––––– 30 . , ,

, , 2013., . 181. 31 . 162. 1. „ “, . 24/2005, 61/2005,

54/2009 32/2013. , , I . 190/2005 - 22/2011-26. , I .

187/2005 - 79/2011-58 32 . , ,

, , 2013., . 179.

, ( . 405–427)

416

-

. - , -

. -

. - -, , -

- .33

, -

, -. ,

, .34 -

, , .35

, -, ,

, -

. - -

.36 - ,

. -

, .37

–––––––––– 33 . 162. 2. „ “, . 24/2005, 61/2005,

54/2009 32/2013., , I . 190/2005 - 22/2011-26. , I .

187/2005 - 79/2011-58 34 . 228. (Act I, Hungarian Official Gazette No. 2 of 2012 on

6 January 2012 and Act CIII, Hungarian Official Gazette No. 103 of 2013 on 22 June 2013) 35 . , , , vol. 41, iss. 5-6,

1992. ., . 891. 36 . 161. 4. „ “, . 24/2005, 61/2005,

54/2009 32/2013. , , I . 190/2005 - 22/2011-26. , I .

187/2005 - 79/2011-58. 37 . , ,

, 2013., . 181.

, 1/2014

417

2005. 38 -

-

, ,

2001. .39

, ,

, ,

. -

-

, , .

, ( -

), -

. -

-

,

,

, -

. -

-

.

,

.

, -

.

,

.

, -

, -

, .40

, -

,

.

–––––––––– 38 . 161. 162. („ . “, . 24/2005, 61/2005, 54/2009

32/2013) 39 . 94. 2. („ . “, . 70/2001 73/2001 - .) 40 . , ,

, 2013., . 179.

, ( . 405–427)

418

-

.

,

.41

,

.

.

, ,

. -

-

,

.42

, ,

,

, -

, .43

, ,

-

. -

-

.44

III

,

: „inevitable disclosure“, „garden leave“, -

„non solicitation agreement“.

–––––––––– 41 . , ,

, ,

2012., . 306. 42 . , , , vol. 41, iss. 5-6,

1992. ., . 889. 43 . 147. 148. „ “, . 24/2005, 61/2005, 54/2009

32/2013., , I . 190/2005 - 22/2011-26. , I . 187/2005 -

79/2011-58 44 . 37. (Act I, Hungarian Official Gazette No. 2 of 2012 on 6

January 2012 and Act CIII, Hungarian Official Gazette No. 103 of 2013 on 22 June 2013)

, 1/2014

419

, -

„inevitable disclosure“. -

, -

,

.45

,

.

-

-

, , -

, -

.46

-

.47

. -

,

. -

( )

,

,

.

, -

.

-

-

.48 -

-

.49 ,

(

, -

–––––––––– 45 N. Bishara, S. Ross, he law and ethics of restrictions on an employee’s post-emplo-

yment mobility, American Business Law Journal, Volume 49, Issue 1, 1-61, 2012., . 17. 46 4. 1. „ . “, . 72/2011. 47 . 6. „ . “, . 72/2011. 48 . , , , , 2009. ., . 143

144. 49 . , ,

, 2013., . 180.

, ( . 405–427)

420

) ( )

.

, , -

.50

,

, -

, -

,

, -

.51

„Garden leave“

,

.

, -

. -

,

. -

, -

,

.

, -

, . -

,

. -

,

„garden leave“

. „garden

leave“ -

,

. -

, -

. ,

, „garden leave“ -

-

–––––––––– 50 . 11. 1. 4. 5. . 12. („ .

“, . 72/2011.) 51 . 240. 1-3. („ . ", . 85/2005, 88/2005 -

., 107/2005 - ., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012 104/2013)

, 1/2014

421

-

. -

-

(„the price mecha-

nism“). -

.

.

, (

). -

( ; -

-

-

;

-

; , , )

;

; ;

;

-

. , ,

( ) -

, -

,

, .52 , -

, (

).

,

, -

(

).53

-

–––––––––– 52 . 109. („ “, 36/2011

99/2011) 53 . , , , , 2009. ., . 142 143

, ( . 405–427)

422

,

, : , -

, -

, , -

, -

, .54 -

, -

, -

, -

-

5% , -

-

, ,

30 .55

„non solicitation agreement“.

, , - , .

-

, - o . -

, - („non disclosure agreement“).

- , ,

- , ,

. , , -

. , , -

. -

, .56

–––––––––– 54 . 76. . 77. („ “, 36/2011

99/2011) 55 . 78 79. („ “, 36/2011

99/2011) 56 L. Guerin J.D., Employment Law: The Essential HR Desk Reference, Nolo, Berkeley,

2011. . 221 222

, 1/2014

423

IV

,

, -

, .

, , -

,57

.58

-

, ,

, , , , ,

, , , ,

, .59

( ) , -

,

-

,

. -

, ,

-

, -

. ( )

, -

, ,

.60 ,

-

-

-

.61

, -

. („high-velocity labor

market“) -

–––––––––– 57 . 60. 2. 3. „ “, . 98/06 58 . 53. „ “, . 98/06 59 . 21. 1., 2. 3. „ “, . 98/06 60 . 18-20. „ “, . 98/06 61 . , , , .

3/1983. . 102

, ( . 405–427)

424

. -

-

, -

. -

, . -

, ,

,

.62 -

, -

.63 -

, -

,

.64

-

-

, , -

, a – -

.65

,

( ),

-

-

, . „

: ,

, , “.66

-

, , -

–––––––––– 62 ,

, -

32%

. R. Tchernis, easuring human capital and its effects on wage growth, Journal of

Economic Surveys, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2010. , . 378 63 . , ,

, Vol. 30, . 2, 2009. ., . 921. 64 . , . , , -

, vol. 35., 1/2012, 2012. ., . 177. 65 . , , , .

3/1983., . 102 66 . , , , vol. 41, iss. 5-6,

1992. ., . 888.

, 1/2014

425

-

.67 ,

-

, -

, -

.68 , -

,

, - -

-

, .69

-

, -

, -

. -

( , ). -

(

) (

), .

.

-

-

. -

, good-

will- .70 ,

-

, .71

–––––––––– 67 H. Collins, K. Ewing, A. McColgan, Labour Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambrid-

ge 2012, . 146 68 . , , , vol. 41, iss. 5-6,

1992. ., . 888. 69 . , , -

, , 2013. .,

. 51. 70 M. Garrison, J. Wendt, he evolving law of employee noncompete agreements: recent

trends and an alternative policy approach, American Business Law Journal, Volume 45, Issue 1,

2008. ., . 186. 71 B.K. Repa, Your rights in the workplace, Nolo, Berkeley, 2007., . 389.

, ( . 405–427)

426

, -

-

.72

-

, -

.73

V

, -

.

, -

, , -

.

, -

, -

. -

,

, -

.

,

50%

. -

(

).

( )

, .

–––––––––– 72 . , ,

, , 2013., . 180. 73 N. Bishara, S. Ross, he law and ethics of restrictions on an employee’s post-em-

ployment mobility, American Business Law Journal, Volume 49, Issue 1, 2012., . 5-42.

, 1/2014

427

Aleksandra Popovi , Ph.D. Student

University of Belgrade

Faculty of Law Belgrade

Effect of the Prohibition of Competition in the Labor Law

Abstract: Freedom to work is a fundamental principle of labor law and in-

cludes the right of individuals, in accordance with their abilities, to chooses em-

ployment or independently to perform certain activities. The introduction of

bans, among which include the prohibition of competition is restricting the free-

dom of labor. The paper outlines the nature and effect of the prohibition of com-

petition in the labor law with extract of the most important legal comparative

elements. The aim is to show that the legitimacy of the prohibition of competi-

tion involves striking a balance between the business interests of the employer

and the employee's freedom to work. The conclusion is that domestic law does

not provide sufficient imperative protection of employees in the context of con-

tracting prohibition of competition, with the suggestion that it is expedient to

specify the minimum amount of compensation for the duration of this ban to em-

ployment.

Key words: prohibition of competition, anticompetitive clauses, ban to em-

ployment