3 CITIES PROJECT 1 PRESENTATION SLIDES

Assignment 1: Ideas and Theories In Urbanism

Reference: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=194064

KL Central Group:

Yong Yih Tyng 0312764

Darshiini 0319359

Foong Tze Ying 0324073

Ng Zheng Si 0322585

Lee Pui San 0319089

Lai YiK Xin 0323388

Beh Nian Zi 0319445

Eng Shi Yi 0317849

KL SENTRAL CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD)

Ar. Dr. Kisho Kurokawa – Background


Ar. Dr. Kisho Kurokawa – Designer’s Background

- Agricultural City Plan- Project for a Helix City

- Floating City, Kasumigaura

- Prefabricated Apartment House

by 3-Dimensional Concrete Units

- Metabolism Scketch

- Metamorphosis’65

- The Cannery of Nitto Food

Company

- Ishino New Town

- Fujisawa New Town

- Resort Center Yamagata

Hawaii Dreamland

1960

- Expo’70 (Toshiba IHI Pavilion,

Takara Beautilion, Theme Pavilion)

- Paris Pompidou Centre International

Competition Design

- Nakagin Capsule Tower

- TANU Headquarters Building and

National Assembly Hall, Tanzania

- Head Office of the Fukuoka Bank

- UAE (Abu Dhabi) Conference City

Design Competition

- Sony Tower

- Headquarters of the Japanese

Red Cross Society

- National Museum of Ethnology

- Saitama Prefectural Museum of

Modern Art

1970

- National Bunraku Theater

- Wacoal Kojimachi Building

- Expo’85 (Block G for Foreign

Countries, - - Electronic Power

Pavilion, Toshiba - -

- Pavilion, IBM Pavilion, The Mitsui

Group Waterfall Pavilion)

- New Tokyo Plan 2025

- UAE (Abu Dhabi) National

University Design Competition

- Nagoya City Art Museum

- Japanese-German Center of

Berlin

- Hiroshima City Museum of

Contemporary Art

1980

- Pacific Tower

- Osaka Prefectural Government

Office (New Wing)

- Okinawa Prefectural

Government Office

- Memorial Hall for Shirase - -

- Expeditionary Party of the

South Pole

- Miki House New Office Building

- Nara City Museum of

Photography

- Aiwa Golf Clubhouse and

Hotel, Miyazaki Course

- Kyushu Golf Club, Yahata

Course

- Shirotopia Memorial Park Rest

House Senkantei

1990

1990- Chinese-Japanese Youth

Center (Beijing, China)

- The Sporting Club at Illinois

Center (Chicago, USA)

- Melbourne Central

(Melbourne, Australia)

- Lane Crawford Place (Singapore)

- Republic Plaza (Singapore)

- KL Internatioal Airport (Selangor,

Malaysia)

- Astana Master Plan for the New –

- Capital of Kazakhstan

- Public Space Conceptural Design - - Along

The Central Axis in Shenzhen City Center

- New Wing of the Van Gogh

- Museum (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

- Oguchi Junior High School

- Osaka International Convention Center

- Flower Hill Museum

- Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum

- The Museum of Modern Art

Wakayama/Wakayama –

- Prefectural Museum

Ehime Museum of Science

- Ishibashi Junior High School

- Kibi-cho City Hall/Kibi Dome

Softopia Japan

- Fukui City Museum of Art

- Kashima-machi City Hall

- Shiga Kogen Roman Art

Museum

- Fujinomiya Golf Club

- Hotel Kyocera

- Amber Hall

- Kyocera Headquarters Building

- O_Residence

- Central Plaza One and Two

19902000

- Oita Stadium

- Toyota City Stadium

- Sakai City Nobiyaka Kenkokan

- Japanese Nursing Association

Headquarters

- Nagasaki Museum of History and Culture

- National Art Center, Tokyo

- Nagasaki Prefectural Archeological Center

Iki City Ikikoku Museum

- Spazio Brera Ginza

- Guangzhou Pearl Riverside Area Concept

Plan and Focus Urban Design

- Kunming New International Airport Master

Plan (Kunming, China)

- Yilanzhai Museum (Nanking, China)

- Astana International Airport (Astana,

Republic of Kazakhstan)

- Tea Ceremony House and Japanese

2000

- Garden at Westcott

House, The Frank Lloyd –

Wright Foundation

(Springfield, USA)

- The Zhengdong New

Town Zhengzhou City,

China

- Fusionopolis @ one-north

(Singapore)

- Chongqing International

Financial Center

(Chongqing, China)

- Dianshang Lake Villa

Lake House (Shanghai,

China)

2010

- Maruha Drive-In

- Sado Information Center

- New Entrance of the

Van Gogh Museum

- Senju Long-Term Care

Health Facility

- Maggie’s Centre

(Swansea, England)

- Nazarbayev University

- Master Plan &

- Architectural Design

- Monitoring Services

- Stone Museum,

Yoshiundo

- St. Petersburg Football

Stadium


Reference: http://www.kisho.co.jp/page/3.html


1960, age of 26, founders of the Metabolism Movement

Intermediate

Space

Fractal

Life Principle

SymbiosisMetabolism

Information

Recycle

Ecology


Reference: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=194064 References:Reference: http://socks-studio.com/2015/02/24/agricultural-city-by-kisho-kurokawa-1960/


Kisho Kurokawa, Helix City, 1961

Kisho Kurokawa, Agricultural City Project, 1961

kisho kurokawa. floating city, 1961


References:

Site Introduction


Site Study – Kuala LumpurLocation Plan N.T.S


SiteMain Gateways

References:Reference: http://www.dbkl.gov.my/pskl2020/english/urban_design_and_landscape/#14_1

Site Study – Kuala LumpurLocation Plan N.T.S


Reference: http://www.dbkl.gov.my/pskl2020/english/urban_design_and_landscape/#14_1

Visual Linkages in the City Centre Urban Character of the City Proposed Pedestrian Linkages in the City Centre Proposed Historical Zone in City Centre

Site History


Site Study – Kuala LumpurMorphology – Kuala Lumpur History


References: google images



References: google images1884 – Kuala Lumpur




1920 – KL General View



1950 - Brickfield





1960– KL Downtown



Year 1960

References: http://www.nstp.com.my/



1962 – KL Street




1971 – KL Flood

KL Central

Brickfield




1982 – Kuala Lumpur Railway Station




References: http://www.wonderfulmalaysia.com/kuala-lumpur-history.htm

1857: 87 tin miners find rich sources of tin around the area.

1862: Kuala Lumpur grows rapidly. New miners from over the world settle here, with many

conflicts and gang wars as a result.

1869: Yap Ah Loy becomes Chinese Kapitan of Kuala Lumpur and succeeds to establish law

and order in Kuala Lumpur in just a few years.

1880: Kuala Lumpur becomes a modern town when the British representative Frank

Swettenham develops the first city plan.

1887: Kuala Lumpur becomes the capital of the state of Selangor.

1896: The Federated Malay States is formed by uniting the Sultans of four states. Kuala Lumpur

becomes capital of the Federated Malay States.

1946: Kuala Lumpur becomes capital in the Federation of Malaya.

1957: Malaysia celebrates its independence on August 31 after 151 years of British rule. Kuala

Lumpur becomes capital of the Independent Federation of Malaya.

1963: Kuala Lumpur becomes capital of Malaysia.

1974: Kuala Lumpur becomes a Federal Territory (Wilayah Persekutuan) with its own

administration.

1999: The federal administrative capital of Malaysia moves to Putrajaya.

2007: Kuala Lumpur celebrates its 50th year as capital of Malaysia and Malaysia its 50th year

of independence.

Site StudyMorphology – Kuala Lumpur Human Activities Context


1970 – Food Stall References: google images1950

1900 – Ice water vendor1890 – nyonya cake seller

1946 – “ Kedai Runcit” Malay retail shop

Inspired Verandah

Concept

- To provide an urban designmechanism that can beutilized in city planning and

design to give the Malaysiacapital city of Kuala Lumpur itsown cohesive regional urbanimage and national identity

– (Some Urban Design Ideas for Kuala Lumpur, 1987, Ken Yeang)

- Malaysia streetscape

serving as transitional space

- Multi-functional uses

- Visually identifiable

- Position and configuration

respond to Malaysian

climate

- Form is derived from the

traditional shop house

archetype

KL Central Development


KL Sentral is being developed by a consortium made up of

Malaysian Resources Corporation Berhad (MRCB),

Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB) and Pembinaan Redzai Sdn Bhd.


Site Study – KL Central ContextKey Plan N.T.S and Relation with Surrounding


KL Central

Brickfield

Reference: google images

built on the former

Keretapi Tanah Melayu

marshalling yard in Brickfields.

Site Development MorphologySite Development - Timeline


2004

2008

2010

2015

KL Central Development

Nearby Development

Reference: google images

Case Study: KL Central – Kisho KurokawaMaster Planning


Reference:

http://ir.chartnexus.com/mr

cb/docs/note/MRCB%20-

%20v11.pdf

Case Study: KL Central – Kisho KurokawaSite Plan N.T.S, Overview


Reference: https://www.google.com.my/maps/place/KL+Sentral+Station/

KL Sentral is being developed by a

consortium made up of Malaysian

Resources Corporation Berhad (MRCB),

Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB) and

Pembinaan Redzai Sdn Bhd.

- Divided into 15 land parcels

- 9,200,000 sq. ft. of commercial space

- 3,256,000 sq. ft. of residential space

Reference images: http://www.ffdrt.com/a-study-of-multi-centred-city-transformation/

Case Study: KL Central – Kisho KurokawaSite Plan N.T.S, Overview


Reference: http://www.klsentral.com.my/

Ar. Dr. Kisho Kurokawa – Design Ideas Analysis


Case Study: KL Central – Kisho KurokawaDesign Philosophy, Ideas


well-planned layoutof spacious plazas

indoor courtyards

sidewalk cafes, shops, restaurants

numerous pedestrianwalkways

artistically landscapedgreenery and bufferzones

a city where life flowsefficiently withoutlimitation

city-within-a-city

open layout ensures evenhuman traffic is maintainedwithin non-intrusive limits.

work, live and play co-exist in a harmonic environment.

CORAL

Achieving the perfect

balance between technology

and humanity in architecture

enables it to sustain

continuous growth. Corals

constantly rebuild their living

structures, allowing steady

flows of abundant sea animals

to make them their home and

feeding ground. Our vision is

to build a city where life flows

efficiently without limitation.

LEAF

Despite ever-changing

conditions, a leaf works to

supply food to the rest of the

plant while providing the

atmosphere with oxygen. We

believe in building cities

whose individual parts

constantly support each

other, resulting in systems

that are forever productive.

SHELL

Cities must be built with

occupants in mind,

making them habitats

conducive to live in for a

lifetime. Very much like a

shell, it constantly

improves its home,

rendering its shelter to

perfection, and lives in

harmony with its natural

habitat. Our foremost

concern is not only the

present but also the future

comforts of the people

who live within our city.


Analysis – Building Form



Organized into individual small

pockets, surrounded by paths.

Linear arrangement of buildings in

pockets contribute to visual

consistency

Consistent distance between

buildings provides walkable

spaces

Horizontal façade (longer sides)

of the buildings are facing the

adjacent buildings:

– maximize surveillance, improve

safety


Horizontal façade (longer sides)

of the buildings are facing the

adjacent buildings:

– maximize surveillance, improve

safety

Longer side façade

(KL Central)

Longer side façade

(Brickfield)

Site StudyFaçade Orientation

KL Central Brickfield

Buildings are in linear formBuildings that are in point form


Site StudyForm Pattern

Focal Point

The focal point is located at the Station sentral kl because it has

the lowest height compared to surrounding building

KL Central Sheltered from Sun

Due to the strategic location of KL central in the middle of the

group of buildings which are taller, the hub is sheltered from

direct sun lightThe elevation sketch shows the hierarchy of KL Sentral.

The focal point is the Stesen Sentral Kuala Lumpur.


Site StudyForm, Order and Hierarchy


Site StudyDesign Ideas Facilitate Functions

The buildings facade surrounding the kl

sentral have a horizontal and linear

pattern, but only the facade of kl sentral

have a curvy shape wich create a contrast

among the building and also become the

focal point at the area.


sunlight

Site Study

External metal louver screen provide sun shading system

to lower the building temperature like leaf use

photosynthesis to produce oxygen by absorbing light,

water and carbon dioxide.

Glass

Concrete

The materials are mostly or all glass like leaf to

absorb the sunlight which use for photosynthesis

Usage of opaque material at ground to first floor

level provide security to the user, and enhance the

sense of direction / location of openings

Usage of transparent material like glass on the

upper floors improve the overall light condition at

site by allowing sun light penetration to increase

natural lifted space. Like the leaf absorb sunlight

and use it as the main energy source.

Façade Design and Material


Site StudyComparison - Façade Analysis (old and new)

Five foot way

- Economical activities for local

- Pedestrian

No five foot way

- Building is not engage with people

Facade lack of

social interaction

and local

cultural identity


Site StudyComparison - Visual Connectivity

Building at KL Central: Visual repelling, no

engagement with users, height is contrast

different from context


Site StudyComparison - Building Form Morphology

Traditional Shop house Duality of traditional

Shop houses and new

Designed shop houses

KL Central

Modern Design (Globalize

Design)

- Lack of local identity

1. Building design lack of Local Identity

2. Building design do not engage usual – social unfriendly design

Site StudyCriticism - Form


Analysis – Movement and Circulation


Site StudyAssignment 1: Ideas and Theories In Urbanism

Movement and Circulation – Linear and Loop

loop

linear

Easy Accessibility To Major

Roads And Highways

Vehicles enter from Jalan

Tun Sambanthan, Jalan

Damansara, Jalan

Bangsar, Jalan Travers

A loop system bringing

extraneous unnecessary

traffic into the most

congested area during

peak hours.

Location leaves the strong

possibility that the loop

routes could still become

overloaded at peak times.

Coral -to build a city

where life flows efficiently

without limitation


Access From Major Roads (Primary Path) and Roads (Secondary Path) To KL Sentral

• KL Sentral

• Hilton Kuala Lumpur

Jalan Tun sambanthan

Jalan Travers

Jalan Damansara

Jalan Bangsar

Jalan Stensen Sentral 5

Jalan Stesen Sentral 4

Jalan Stensen Sentral 5• Commercial Area

• Museums

• NU Sentral

• Q Sentral

Legend

Primary PathsSecondary Paths


Site Study

Site Study

• KL Sentral

Jalan Damnsara

Jalan Bangsar

Jalan Travers



Primary PathsSecondary PathsHighway

• Hilton Kuala Lumpur

• Commercial Area

• Museums

• NU Sentral

• Q Sentral

Exit From Kl Sentral to Primary Paths (Major Road) to Secondary Paths (Road)

Legend


Site StudyPublic transport

Bus - Taxi – Train

Taxi

Link to each other

Regional TOD

Reference: http://www.lcct.com.my/others/places/kl-sentral-station

Concept-Leaf

building cities whose individual

parts constantly support each

other, resulting in systems that are

forever productive.


Bus

Bus station stretches around Kl

Sentral to reduce traffic

congestion.

Concept-Leaf




forever productive.


Site StudyPublic Transport

Taxi - Do not have proper parking area for taxi.




Concept-Leaf



other, resulting in systems that

are forever productive.

Interchange- supporting each

other

LRT

Monorail

KTM

Train



Vehicular Circulation

Towers are being serviced and consist of a formal drop off area whilst not contributing to the congestion in other islands. Traffic control officers are

always seen to be keeping on toes to ensure no parking at the curb that could cause rippling congestion to other islands.

However has not stopped the traffic congestion outside the perimeter of CBD, on Jalan Tun Sambanthan, Jalan Travers, Jalan Damansara, and Jalan

Istana during peak hours.

Analysis



Site Study

Issues Exist in KL Sentral

Lack clarity in movement pattern

where linkages of between major

and minor roads

Motorcycle Links are not

existing

• Jalan Stesen Sentral 5

Motorcycles

• Jalan Tun Sambanthan

Cycle ways in housing estates suffer from

under usage, misuse (illegal parking) and

poor maintenance

Lack of continuity in the cycle way networks.

Bicycles

LegendPrimary Path Jalan DamansaraSecondary Paths Jalan Stesen Sentral 5

Primary Path Jalan Tun Sambanthan

• Jalan Damansara


The furthest buildings within 400m of walkable distance from the

station, it corresponds to the distance someone can walk in 5

minutes at 4.8km/h.

It becomes more encouraging with the covered walkway to shelter

against rain, zebra crossing, traffic light, 24 hour securities for each

drop off area. This creates a common space shared by low-wage

service workers as well as high value knowledge workers and

creative professionals.

With 400m walking distance residents have easy access to daily

needs in the diversified CBD, thus creating a Transit Orientated

Development.


Reference

Federal Department of Town & Country Planning Ministry Of Urban Wellbeing, Housing & Local Government Malaysia



Site StudyPedestrian


Movement and Circulation Pattern (Pedestrian - Diffuse)

Safety Issue


Site Study


Limited usage of pedestrian linking bridge between Platinum Sentral and Menara CIMB, not for public access


Pedestrian Linkage


Site Study

Only benefits the building users

No pedestrian connectivity

Site Study

Jalan Tun Sambanthan

– KL Central to Brickfield Transitional Space – Linkage Across Jalan Tun Sambanthan (Nu Sentral to Brickfield)


Pedestrian Linkage


Jalan Tun Sambanthan – Drop Off Point


Drop Off Point


Site Study

Jalan Stesen Sentral 5 – Linkage Across Jalan Stesen Sentral 5 – connecting two buildings (KL Central and Hilton Hotel)

Jalan Stesen Sentral 5 – Shelter walkway. Common drop off point

Pedestrian + vehicular = mixedReference: https://www.google.com.my/maps/place/KL+Sentral+Station/

Drop Off Point


Site Study

-Some buildings do not permit public access across their property boundaries thus leaving narrow space for pedestrian movement.

-Dangerous for pedestrian

-No proper protection from sun and rain



Pedestrian Path


Site Study


- Not Safe

- No Shelter

- Pedestrian walkway too narrow/ no pedestrian walkway

Pedestrian Path


Site Study


No tactile pathway for visual impaired pedestrian

Has tactile pathway for visual impaired pedestrian

on the other side if Jalan Tun Sambanthan

Jalan Tun Sambanthan

Disconnected tactile pathway for visual impaired pedestrian


Pedestrian Path


Site Study

1. Pedestrian paths are not well designed

- Disconnection of tactile path for blind

- Narrow pedestrian path

- No handrails or safety design

- Disconnection shelter path

- Road mainly privatize by building

Site StudyCriticism - Circulation


Analysis – Activities and Historical Social Culture


KL Central

Nu Sentral

Function of space affects the movement pattern.

Transportation hub and commercial retails are

the major nodes.

High Human Density

Site StudyHuman Density


Site StudyBuilding Types and Zoning



Concept-Leaf




forever productive.

Site StudyDesign Ideas Facilitate Functions


Architect’s ideas of space functioning:

Mix-use

Commercial

Mix-use

CommercialResidential

Residential

Transportation

OfficeOffice

Brickfield

Design Ideas VS site conditions

Mix-use

CommercialResidential

Residential

Transportation

OfficeOffice

Commercial

International

Other States

Brickfield

International

Other States

Concept-Leaf

building cities whose

individual parts

constantly support

each other, resulting

in systems that are

forever productive.

KL Central

Site StudyComparison – cultural identity


Reference: http://googleimages/

Brickfield

KL Central new building

design lack of local

historical social culture

relation

Building at surrounding context are:

1. Cultural Vibrant

2. Religious

Site StudyLocal Social Activities




User:

1. Tourist

2. Business owner

3. Religious worker

4. Volunteer

5. Students

6. Lecturer

7. Resident

8. Disabled

9. Traditional dancer

10.Artist

11.Prostitute

Economic:

1. Florist

2. Retail

3. Local Food

4. Education

5. Tourism

6. Prostitution

Site StudySocial activities at KL Central




Contrast

Old New

Site StudyComparison – Street Activity Changes


References:Reference: https://www.google.com.my/maps/place/KL+Sentral+Station/

- Wider street, more social friendly

- Outdoor

- Narrow street, less user friendly

- Indoor

Site StudyMorphology – Street Activity Changes (Pedestrian Use)


Year 1960

Year 2015References:http://www.nstp.com.my/

Site StudyMorphology –Economic Changes (Outdoor to Indoor)


Year 1946


Year 2015

Year 1968

Year 1900

Site StudyPublic Realm



Jalan Stesen Sentral 5No street light

Little sitting area

Discontinued blind pedestrian from brickfield

Jalan Stesen Sentral 5No street light

Discontinued blind pedestrian from brickfield

Discontinued sheltered walkway

No safety bar on sidewalk


Jalan Tun Sambatham

Sitting Areas

A little green pocket space

Limited Drop off Zone and parking space

Not well planned taxi stand

Lack of local cultural context


1. Activities are being solely separated with area in Brickfields – involvement of public is saturated.

2. KL Sentral has become its own island by itself to sustain the development.

3. Spaces connecting or linking for exchange usage has become a private space where public usage is restricted.

4. Not cultural responsive

5. Public Spaces are privatized by building owner

6. Activities are mainly to boost economic, seldom cultural activities

Site StudyCriticism – Activities and Functions


Analysis Summary


Site StudyAnalysis Summary


Design Ideas Categories Statement

CORAL

Corals constantly rebuild their living structures,

allowing steady flows of abundant sea animals to

make them their home and feeding ground. Our

vision is to build a city where life flows efficiently

without limitation.

FormThe 15 division of the lands contain buildings with mixed-use functions to sustain the residents at the central

Movement and Circulation

The loop circulation provides a better traffic condition within KL Central

However, due to the juxtaposition of the main roads were always at the center of congestion, the loop circulation planning is only effective within KL Central

LEAF

Despite ever-changing conditions, a leaf works to

supply food to the rest of the plant while providing

the atmosphere with oxygen. We believe in

building cities whose individual parts constantly

support each other, resulting in systems that are

forever productive

Movement AndCirculation

The types of public transports provided in KL Central are abundance and linked for normal people.

However, the limited drop off points, unfriendly pedestrian path can be an issue to the pedestrian users, also to the disabled people (etc: blind) from Brickfield

Activities and Functions

The building types at KL Central is designed mostly as mixed typology in order to sustain the population within the KL Central. The functions provided are retail, entertainment, residential, office and transportation hub.

However, the provided facilities are most of the time benefit the residents within KL Central. Due to most of the facilities in KL Central are targeted to users at middle to above middle classes, the poorer residents might also not able to appreciate the benefits.

SHELL

like a shell, it constantly improves its home,

rendering its shelter to perfection, and lives in

harmony with its natural habitat. Our foremost

concern is not only the present but also the future

comforts of the people who live within our city.

Movement and Circulation

The use of the loop circulation planning in KL Central can be viewed as a future vision to decrease the traffic issue, hence comfort level of the users within the site when the population density increases

However, the lack of consideration of the adjacent site and the actual traffic condition at site limited the execution of the vision

FormThe order of the building are designed to be consistent walkability space. However, the planning introduce diffuse space and lower down security around the site. Also, the lack of balance between built form and landscape decrease the comfort level of the residents.

Site StudyAnalysis Summary


Design Promise Analysis Statements

well-planned layout of spacious plazas Limited space at site

open layout ensures even human traffic is

maintained within non-intrusive limits. Space between building (diffuse)

sidewalk cafes, shops, restaurantsOne Stretch of Semi-outdoor Cafe

work, live and play co-exist in a harmonic

environment.Mixed use building typology contains entertainment, residential, retail and office

a city where life flows efficiently without

limitation Public Transportation and loop circulation planning

artistically landscaped greenery and buffer

zones No to very little

numerous pedestrian walkwaysPedestrian paths are not well designed

indoor courtyardslittle Only certain buildings

Position:


The overall urban planning is not effective at macro

scale because:

1. It does not fully meet the objectives of the design

intention

2. The planning is not interacting with local social

culture/ social activities

3. The circulation planning has not consider the macro

environment

4. The functions and activities proposed were not

considered for all classes of the

Local people

5. There is no sufficient public realm or landscape as

proposed

6. Façade design is not users responsive

7. Planning lack of cultural identity – not local friendly

Thank You !


1. http://www.kisho.co.jp/page/3.html

2. https://www.google.com.my/maps/place/KL+Sentral+Station/

3. http://www.nstp.com.my/

4. http://hlarchitecture.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/NuSentral_05.jpg

5. http://www.iproperty.com.my/propertylisting/2144586/kuala-lumpur-sentral-office-forrent

6. http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=194064

7. http://podsbackpacker.com/?page_id=63

8. http://awol.junkee.com/the-stopover-how-to-spend-24-amazing-hours-in-kuala-lumpur/8564

9. http://www.lcct.com.my/others/places/kl-sentral-station

10. http://ir.chartnexus.com/mrcb/docs/note/MRCB%20-%20v11.pdf

11. http://awol.junkee.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/2254957888_fce54b1ae5_b.jpg

Reference

3 CITIES PROJECT 1 PRESENTATION SLIDES

Education

Transcript of 3 CITIES PROJECT 1 PRESENTATION SLIDES