2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture...

27
2D Crystal Plasticity

Transcript of 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture...

Page 1: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

2D Crystal Plasticity

Page 2: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Models for Polycrystal Behavior

• Development of crystallographic texture – Evolution of preferred crystal orientations

in initially statistically isotropic aggregates– Anisotropy in

• Macroscopic yield loci and

• Macroscopic stress-strain response

• Upper and lower bound models• Planar (2D) idealization

Page 3: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Texture RepresentationPole Figures

• A crystal orientation is represented by its location on a unit sphere projected onto a unit circle

• In general, more than one pole figure is necessary to reconstruct the orientation field

Page 4: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsProvide Bounds on Polycrystal Behavior

• Lower Bounds– (a) Linear– (c) 3D PX– Sachs

• Upper Bounds– (b) Parallel– (d) 3D PXL– Taylor

Page 5: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsUpper & Lower Bound Analyses

Taylor Hybrid Sachs

deformation

stress

Page 6: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• Every crystal within a polycrystalline aggregate subjected to a macroscopically uniform deformation is considered to sustain the same strain as in the bulk material,

i.e. identical deformation rates

• Every crystal within a polycrystalline aggregate subjected to a macroscopically uniform deformation is considered to sustain the same rigid body rotation relative to the reference frame,

i.e. identical macroscopic spins

Page 7: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• Requires a minimum of 5 independent slip systems per crystal

• Reasonable for high symmetry crystals with a significantly larger number of available slip systems than are geometrically necessary

• Non-iterative

• Crystal responses de-couple and may be solved independently of one another, i.e. algorithm can loop over the motion, then the crystal count

Page 8: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• At least 5 slip systems must be active in a grain to accommodate the 5 independent components of strain

• There are 12C5 or 792 combinations of 12 things taken 5 at a time (but not all independent)

• After ruling out kinematically dependent combinations, there remain 384 independent sets of 5 slip rates, each corresponding to a nonsingular system of 5 equations that determines the 5 slip rates

Page 9: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

•“Of all the possible combinations of the 12 shears which could produce an assigned strain, only that combination is operative for which the sum of the absolute values of shears is least”

• Each crystal will slip on that combination of systems that makes the LEAST AMOUNT of incremental work

Page 10: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• For rate dependent crystal response

• Generally, fully 12 systems are potentially active

• As , while 12 systems are mathematically viable, only 5 are effectively activated, i.e. the rate insensitive limit is reached

g

g g

o

N

g

N 0

Page 11: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• Obtain the average crystal stress response for the polycrystal

• Update the individual crystal orientations

T T g T g

g

ggA

gggTgg RPskwWRRRW

1

Page 12: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• Consider an axisymmetric tensile specimen

• Incremental Work

• A scalar measure of the aggregate yield strength is given by the so-called Taylor factor

dW Td gd min d

M T

min d d

g g,

Page 13: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• For an initially uniform distribution of crystals, M = 3.06

• M is a measure of how favorably oriented the aggregate is for slip

• M will evolve with texture @ finite strain

Page 14: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• The Taylor Factor is purely a function of orientation

Page 15: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• The aggregate would tend to attain a state in which the crystal axes of grains have either a (111) or a (100) axis aligning with the direction of extension

Page 16: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. I. Taylor (1938)

• The hypothesis ensures intergranular compatibility at the expense of intergranular equilibrium

• The response represents an UPPER BOUND on the averaged stress in the polycrystalline aggregate

• The resultant texturing of the aggregate is, in general, too strong in comparison with experimentally observed textured polycrystals

Page 17: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsUpper Bound Stiffness

• Aggregate stiffness is the average of the single crystal stiffness tensors

T g Mg 1Dg

T g Mg 1Dg

T Mg 1D

Page 18: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. Sachs (1928)

• Every crystal within a polycrystalline aggregate subjected to a macroscopically uniform stress field is considered to sustain the same stress as in the bulk material,

i.e. identical stress in all crystals

• Every crystal within a polycrystalline aggregate subjected to a macroscopically uniform deformation is considered to sustain the same rigid body rotation relative to the reference frame,

i.e. identical macroscopic spins

Page 19: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. Sachs (1928)

• The hypothesis ensures intergranular equilibrium at the expense of intergranular compatibility

• The response represents a LOWER BOUND on the averaged stress in the polycrystalline aggregate

• The more favorably oriented crystals slip at the expense of those for whom the crystal stress would exceed the macroscopically applied effective value, i.e. the crystal strain rates in the aggregate can exhibit large inhomogeneities

Page 20: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsG. Sachs (1928)

• Applicable to systems with low crystal symmetry, i.e. fewer than 5 independent slip systems per crystal

• Many mineralogical materials,rocks and highly constrained crystal classes such as HCP fall in this category

• Non-iterative

• Crystal responses de-couple and may be solved independently of one another, i.e. algorithm can loop over the motion, then the crystal count

Page 21: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsLower Bound Stiffness

• Aggregate stiffness is the inverse of the average of the single crystal compliance tensors

Dg MgT g

Dg MgT g

D Mg T

T Mg 1D

Page 22: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsHybrid Models

• Just as implied, these models impose certain stress components at the crystal level equal their respective macroscopic values while the remaining components of the motion equal the macroscopic values

• Examples– Constrained Hybrid Model (Parks & Ahzi)

– Relaxed Constraints Model (Kocks et al.)

– Self-Consistent Methods (Tome, Molinari, Canova, et al.)

Page 23: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsConstrained Hybrid Stiffness

g I 32 (c)(c)

(c)c c 13 I

Dg g g 1D

T g 1Mg 1 g g 1

D

Aggregate Stiffness

Page 24: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Double Slip Occurs in Specially OrientedFCC Crystals (Goss Texture)

Moderate Texture Sharp Texture

Page 25: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Approximate Polycrystal ModelsYield Loci

• Texture

• Upper Bound Yield Surface

• Lower BoundYield Surface

Page 26: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

FCC Aggregate Yield Loci

Page 27: 2D Crystal Plasticity. Models for Polycrystal Behavior Development of crystallographic texture –Evolution of preferred crystal orientations in initially.

Rate Dependence Scales Flow Surface and Rounds Yield Locus Vertices