25 Years In Well -Control and Rig Equipment Inspection...
-
Upload
hoangnguyet -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of 25 Years In Well -Control and Rig Equipment Inspection...
25 Years In Well-Control and Rig Equipment Inspection • Registered on ISN Net World and PEC Premier • OHSAS 18001: 2007 • ISO 9001: 2008 • IADC Accredited Training Center
Ricky Eaton Intervention Manager 21 years in Subsea Operations and Well-Control Equipment
Kickoff meeting and contents Safety evaluation of onsite personnel and equipment Intervention well-control equipment from a regulatory standpoint Equipment Pedigree Theoretical Shear Calculations The Letter
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET
2
Agenda
Kick Off Meeting
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 3
Understanding the third-party verification process.
Narrow the gray areas with a frozen scope of work.
Critical components documentation and traceability review.
Incidents of Non-Compliance (INC) prevention.
Performance Improvement Plans (PINC) prevention.
Preventive maintenance and Repair history.
A equipment checklist philosophy will stay efficient alongside onsite systems testing.
Shearables.
Kick Off Meeting
We use a safety checklist in the evaluation process.
Job Safety Analysis (JSA) Proper testing equipment Ensure safety barriers Personnel competency
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET
4
Onsite Safety Evaluation
5
Intervention Well-Control Equipment from a Regulation Standpoint
Subsea Intervention Units in retrospect are considered BOPs per 30-cfr-250.1706(e). These units are reviewed in accordance with the rig-based BOP regulations as
much as possible. The following documentation is being required by BSEE and pertains to the third-
party verification process:
Third-Party Shearing Verification Independent Third-Party Verification
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 5
6
Critical Components Checklist
The components identified throughout this process intended to control or regulate the movement of wellbore fluids are considered critical.
The third-party verification process for Intervention well-control is driven by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Not opinions. An experienced independent third-party technical team uses practical methodology. Any well-control verification process should be designed for the equipment being
used and to work efficiently with the onsite systems test procedures.
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 6
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET
7
Equipment Pedigree Importance of documentation
Indicates the equipment has been properly designed and constructed.
Validates Non Destructive Examinations (NDEs) and major inspections. Tracks modifications and current drawings. Documents the integrity of the equipment.
Equipment Pedigree What is pedigree
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET
8
Equipment Pedigree Onboard Documentation
Copies of the manufacturer’s equipment data book and third-party certification shall be available for review.
Equipment records such as API manufacturing documentation (COCs), NACE certification, and factory acceptance testing reports will be available onsite.
Maintenance and repair historical files shall be maintained by serial number and stay with the equipment at all times.
9
Equipment Pedigree Preventive Maintenance (PM)
Planned maintenance is much more cost efficient than unplanned maintenance.
PM programs are audited through the independent third-party verification
process and considered critical. Intervention systems will meet or exceed OEM recommendations. Maintenance documents should be maintained on file, at the rig.
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 9
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET
10
Equipment Pedigree Insufficient Equipment Documentation
• Experience has shown that equipment often has insufficient
documentation.
• This results in a significant scope of work to verify compliance.
• We start with the PM program to see how the equipment is maintained.
• Building a pedigree through existing documentation.
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 11
Data Dashboard Pressure Containing Components Serial Number
S/N Verified
? Yes / No
PSL NDE/UT Inspection Date
Last Major
Inspection
COC Date
COC comments and location.
Maintenance
Documentation
Review Date
Rated Working Pressure
Last Docume
nted FAT Date
Data Book PM Program
5.25 15k Lubricator Ball Valve BPTH
20003-002 Yes 3 Jul-14 7/1/2014
8/16/20124
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k
6/21/2008
Yes Acceptable End Cap, 7 5/8” Thor Box, Collar Flange (2)
2186618/2/1 2186618/2/2 Yes 3
7/1/2014
7/25/2005
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Seat 10110409-2-
1 Yes 3 7/1/20
14 9/12/2002
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
End Cap Retaining Ring (2)
W001 (Top) W002(Botto
m) Yes
3
7/1/2014
11/11/2006
Recertification July 2014 5/15/201
4 (RRE) 15k Yes
Acceptable 5.300” Bore Ball Modification #102632 Rev. C
ENG389-03 /W004 Yes
3
Jul-14 7/1/2014
9/22/2011
Recertification July 2014 5/15/201
4 (RRE)
15k Yes
Acceptable Main Housing, 15k Open Water Lubricator Valve 2186614/1/2 Yes 3 Jul-14 7/1/20
14 9/30/2003
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Cage Nut 2220845/1/1 Yes 3
7/1/2014
1/13/2006
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
End Cap, W/ 7 5/8” Thor Pin W001
SLX3222F1 Yes 3 7/1/20
14 3/23/2006
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Thor Pin S-seal P100001
5509 Yes 7/1/20
14 Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Ball Half Cage 2193450/2/1 Yes 3 7/1/20
14 7/11/2005
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Upper Mandrel Isolation Ring 2189225/12/
1 Yes
3 7/1/20
14 9/1/20
01 Recertification July
2014 5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Ball Rotation Boot (2) Replacement
2169998/1/2 2169998/1/1 Yes 3
7/1/2014
2/12/2007
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Cage End Cap 2189225/7/1 Yes 3 7/1/20
14 3/2320
06 Recertification July
2014 5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Lower Mandrel ENG857-02
W001 Yes 3 7/1/20
14 8/20/2002
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
Lower Mandrel, Isolation Ring Stop W002 Yes
3 7/1/20
14 11/12/2002
Recertification July 2014
5/15/2014 (RRE) 15k Yes Acceptable
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET
12
Independent Third-Party Theoretical Shear Verification Equipment
• Intervention Well-control OEM • Ram/Valve Model • Size and Pressure Rating • Shear Operator/Booster/Bonnet • Ram Design
Shearables • Pipe/Coil Tubing/Wireline • Wall Thickness [in] • Pipe Grade • Yield Strength • Water Depth
13
4 types of independent third-party letters
Full condition independent third-party verification letter
o Complete systems audit and document review.
Independent third-party verification follow-up letter o Confirming nothing has been compromised since last service.
Regulatory Standpoint Independent Third-Party Verification Letters
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 13
14
Regulatory Standpoint Independent Third-Party Letters
Statement of Fact (SOF) o Revisions to operations, procedures or equipment to keep
working. Wet Verification Letters
o Well hops
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 14
15
Regulatory Standpoint Operations
Wet Verifications
Since the Wet Verification testing was conducted subsea, rather than on the stump, this is a more realistic demonstration of the intervention well-control system ability to work as intended if called upon during a well-control event.
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET 15
WWW.SUBSEASOLUTIONS.NET
16
At The End of The Day
The well-control equipment will operate as originally designed.
Any modifications or upgrades to the equipment conducted after delivery has not compromised the design or operations of the system.
The equipment is designed for the specific equipment on the rig and
for the specific well design.
The equipment has not been compromised or damaged from the previous service.
The IWC equipment will operate in the conditions in which it will be
used.