2020 FLEET BAROMETER

2020FLEETBAROMETERGLOBALJune 2020

1 CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY

2

GLOBAL ECONOMIC CONTEXT PER COUNTRY

UKPTES NODK SEFIBE NLLUFRCH ITDE CZ PLAT TRRUBR

1,5 1,30,8 0,6

2,01,3

0,2

3,3

1,7 1,91,2

2,6

4,3

1,81,3 1,1 1,4

0,8 1,10,3

GDP growth in volume in 2019 (Source OECD)

2,9 3,80,4 2,7 2,8 3,3 2,9 2,0

5,0 6,90,0 0,9

8,6

-1,5 0,64,3

0,8 2,9 2,2

-15,9

Investment growth in volume in 2019 (Source OECD)

4,7 5,6 4,63,0

14,0

8,4 9,9

5,43,2

6,33,9

1,93,5 4,9

6,63,4

6,5

12,1

4,6

13,5

Unemployement rate (source ILO)

3

PERIMETER OF THE STUDY

4

METHODOLOGY

DATA COLLECTION

METHOD

FIELDWORK PERIOD TARGET QUOTAS SAMPLE DURATION OF

INTERVIEW

1. CATI SYSTEM

(Computer Assisted

Telephone Interviewing)

FLEET MANAGERS

in companies of all

industries using at least

1 CORPORATE VEHICLE

COMPANY SIZE

& SECTOR

5 600Interviews

in total

4 794through

Europe

806out of

Europe

2. CATI CAWI SYSTEM

Recruitment by

telephone and a link is

sent to complete the

survey online

MIX OF 2 DATA

COLLECTION MODES

20minutes

on average24

MAR

8

JAN

5

NUMBER OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED

Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 vehicle

1 to 99

employees

2891 INTERVIEWS

100 employees

and more

2709 INTERVIEWS Companies with 250 / 500 / 1000 employees and more

1255 INTERVIEWS

Companies with 100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees

1454 INTERVIEWS

Companies with 10 to 99 employees

1261 INTERVIEWS

Companies with less than 10 employees

1630 INTERVIEWS

6

Less than 10 employees

10 to 99 employees

100 to 249 employees



250 employees and more

500 employees and more

1000 employees and

more

NODK SEFIAT RUBRFRESBE DE PLPTCH LU

COMPANY SIZE SEGMENT DEFINITION

IT NL UK CZ TR

7

SAMPLE STRUCTURE

Company

size & sector

TOTAL

Construction

Industry

Services

Trade

This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of vehicles registered by companies for each

company size segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases

In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments

Weight of each

company size

segment

15 15 11 8 13

20 31 36 34 29

37 31 33 40 36

27 23 20 18 23

33 20 27 20

Number of completes

In %

1630 1261 1454 1255

8

2

WHAT ARE THE MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

OF THE FLEETS?

9

NUMBER OF VEHICLES IN FLEET

1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles

1000 vehicles and more

Average number of

vehicles

Can you please tell me the total number of vehicles of less than 3.5 tons in your fleet?

Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

Passenger cars + LCVs

In %

99

vehicles

6 35 46 392

57 56

93 93

67 67

34 33

15 15

32 32

6 6

32 32

55 55

46 46

10 101 1 1 1

10 11

32 33

1 16 7

TOTAL

107

vehicles

6 40 48 424

10

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES WITH AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER CAR OR ONE LCV

(among companies with at least one vehicle in fleet)

PASSENGER

CARS

VANS OR LCVs


In %

TOTAL

89 80 87 95 98

75 65 77 79 85

88 78 86 94 98

76 65 78 80 85

11


1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles





In %

8272

81 83 87 88 91

77 7991

84 89 88 89 8578 82 86

67

89

1826

19 17 13 12 9

21 219

1511 12 10 13

22 1613

32

112 2 1 1 2 1 11


+

Focus on 1 to 99

12


1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles





In %

3019

36

16

3221

2714

20 2417

2942

24 2920

3037

2431

56

44

46

50

52

4950

66 5452

43

55

47

5355

62 38

51

50

53

11

33

15

31

14

2520

2023 22

31

14 1021

15 16

28

11

2413

3 4 3 4 2 5 4 3 19

2 2 1 1 2 5 2 2 2

Focus on 100 and more

+


13

NUMBER OF PASSENGER CARS IN FLEET

1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles


Average number of

passenger cars

And can you please tell me the total number of cars in your fleet?


Passenger cars

In %

67

Passenger

cars

3 24 30 268

55 54

75 7467 67

44 44

22 22

27 26

4 4 20 19

45 45

47 46

7 7

6 6

25 26

1 1

3 4

TOTAL

72

Passenger

cars

3 27 31 287

14

1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles




In %

7769 68

83

66 62

7871

61 60 65

91 88

61 6274 76

88

6776

1220

12

10

55

7 16

135

7

66

6 8

12 12

8

27 6

+

Focus on 1 to 99


Passenger cars


15

1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles




In %


+


Passenger cars


43

27

43

21

43

2335

2129

3927

36

51

3243

36 3445

27

43

42

42

39

49

42

43

48

6050

45

40

54

38

49

45 54

36

44

50

43

9

2410 29

7

22

13 13 1612

21

9 812

8 7

25

920

83 3 2

1

12

2 1 15

1 2 1 2 1 21

16

NUMBER OF LCVS IN FLEET

1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles


Average number of

LCVs

And can you please tell me the total number of LCVs or vans in your fleet?


LCVs

In %

32

LCV

3 11 16 124

54 5463 63 65 66

48 48

34 34

17 17 2 211 12

27 29

34 34

4 43 4

15 151 1

2 3

TOTAL

35

LCV

3 13 17 137

17

1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles




In %

59 64 68

46

7867

80

4856

7464

54

68 71 70 64 60 56 61 66

6

12 7

2

4

5

2

5

10

410

2

27

47

64

44

+

Focus on 1 to 99


LCVs


18

1 to 9 vehicles

10 to 99 vehicles

100 to 999 vehicles




In %


+


LCVs


5240

48

3144

3541

3041 45

27

4955

44 47 4534 39

5144

28

30

30

27

3040 32

37

29

35

34

2121

3624

36

33 25

2532

5

116

7

711

9

27

11

25 51

11

8

8

125

6 71 2

1

12

13

13

1 1

1

2

1

19

VEHICLE POSSESSION LENGTH

On average, how long do you keep your vehicles (before being sold or giving back to the leasing company)?


AVERAGE IN YEARS

TOTAL


5.4 6.1 5.3 5.0 4.9

5.4 6.2 5.5 5.0 4.9

20

VEHICLE POSSESSION LENGTH





6,2 5,6 6,44,4

6,55,0 5,6 4,7 4,7

7,3

4,46,0 5,9 5,3 4,6 5,2 4,8 4,5

6,24,8

5,4

5,4

21

TOTAL

LCVS POSSESSION LENGTH

And how long do you keep your LCV, light commercial vehicles or vans (before being sold or giving back to the leasing company)?

Basis: companies with LCVS= 100 %

AVERAGE IN YEARS

LCVs

5.9 6.7 5.8 5.6 5.4

6.0 6.8 6.0 5.6 5.5

22

LCV POSSESSION LENGTH



LCVs


6,85,8

6,95,2

6,95,8 5,9 5,5 5,6

7,6

4,87,3

6,0 5,6 5,5 5,5 5,54,1

6,55,2

5,9

6.0

23

FLEET GROWTH POTENTIAL

TOTAL

In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will increase, decrease or remain the same?


Increase

Decrease

BALANCE in pts (INCREASE DECREASE)

2020

2019

+24

+11

+17

+6

+26

+12

+27

+15

+30

+16


In %

+20

+11

+12

+6

+23

+11

+24

+14

+25

+15

31 28 23 1831 28 35 32

41 37

7 8 6 7 5 5 8 8 11 12

24

1934

24 16 21 15 20 28 24 26 22 20 2714 18 27 21

5948

37

4 8 8 11 4 7 5 1 5 4 4 4 5 4 10 14 80

6 4




Increase

Decrease


2020

2019


In %


26

6

+14 +26 +15 +4 +17 +8 +15 +27 +19 +23 +18 +16 +22 +10 +8 +13 +13 +59 +42 +33

- +8 +8 +7 +5 +9 +5 +17 +5 +6 +10 +0 +13 - - - - - - +16

20

8

+

25

22

6

16

8

33 35 29 3044

3348 40 39 37 36 26

36 28 34 3122

69

4160

7 10 14 9 6 11 7 7 10 9 12 5 7 14 8 11 20 1 8 5




Increase

Decrease


2020

2019


In %


37

9

+26 +25 +15 +21 +38 +22 +41 +33 +30 +28 +24 +20 +29 +13 +26 +20 +2 +69 +34 +55

- +16 +4 +17 +14 +21 +12 +20 +15 +14 +3 +19 +20 - - - - - - +21

28

15

+

26

34

10

24

15

REASONS FOR FLEET FUTURE INCREASE

Why do you think the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will increase?

Basis: companies expecting an increase of the fleet

10

14

14

21

26

37

75

10

14

15

24

29

35

74

Because of taxes decrease

Your company plans to propose vehicles to

employees with no company car eligibility

Your company plans to propose shared

vehicles to employees

Company car will be proposed in order

to retain employees in your company

Company car will be proposed in order

to support new talents recruitment

Because your company is developing a

new activity that requires company cars

Because your company is growing


In %

27

12

13

18

20

21

24

25

31

32

13

14

18

20

22

23

25

32

33

REASONS FOR FLEET FUTURE DECREASE

Why do you think the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will decrease?

Basis: companies expecting a decrease of the fleet

Passenger cars + LCVsIn %

Because you plan to increase the home office working

Drivers are choosing cash allowance

Because of taxes increase

Shared vehicles will partly or totally

replace the current company fleet

Because of CSR

Because of the introduction or development

of alternative mobility solutions

Your business is declining

The number of employees is reducing

Less employees will have access to company cars

28

3

WHAT CHANGES ARE TO BE EXPECTED IN

THE NEAR FUTURE REGARDING ENERGY MIX?

29

PETROL

EXPECTED PART OF PETROL AND DIESEL IN 3 YEARS

DIESEL

In your opinion, what percentage will diesel vehicles account for in your fleet in 3 years?

In your opinion, what percentage will petrol vehicles account for in your fleet in 3 years?


TOTAL


In %

49 51 50 50 43

48 49 49 49 42

29 30 29 28 30

28 28 28 26 29

30

2533

3927

2127 22 25

32

15

2939 38

29 2620 23

39 44

27

EXPECTED PART OF PETROL (IN 3 YEARS)

In your opinion, what percentage will petrol vehicles account for in your fleet in 3 years?



In %


2928

31

5244

3748 51 55

42

60

34

6051 52

42

56 53 5043

27

4455

EXPECTED PART OF DIESEL (IN 3 YEARS)

In your opinion, what percentage will diesel vehicles account for in your fleet in 3 years?



In %


4849

32

12

12

24

23

15

14

38

38

FOCUS WLTP

Actions to be taken to adapt WLTP

Today, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are determined with a new, more realistic test cycle: the WLTP-test

What actions will be taken to adapt to the WLTP-test?.


Increase the CO2 cap within your policy

Change of the energy mix

in your car policy to meet

the cap of the CO2

defined in your company

Increase of your

TCO budget

No impact


In %

TOTAL

16

15

31

31

19

18

31

31

14

14

26

26

17

16

33

32

18

17

37

38

20

20

30

27

22

21

42

42

25

23

21

22

33

61

7266 68

65

55

70

57

7267

76

31

50 51 50

77

6972

45

54

3445

31 30 26 30

45

29

47

27

41

14

3024

33

4842

49

2330

CONSIDERATION FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL TECHNOLOGIES

Amongst the following alternative fuel technologies, which ones do you use or are you considering using…?

Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years, considered but later, not interested


At least one technology

HOW TO READ THE RESULTS ?

In Austria, 61% of the companies have already implemented or consider to implement at least one alternative technology in the next 3 years. 34% have already implemented at least one.


In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS


61

34

62

34

34

CONSIDERATION FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL TECHNOLOGIES

At least one technology





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS61 62

50 49

56 57

66 68

79 81

34 34

20 18

27 27

40 41

5557

TOTAL

35

Passenger car fleet

ALTERNATIVE FUEL TECHNOLOGIES USAGE – DETAIL PER TECHNOLOGY



Basis: companies with corporate passenger cars

In %

Passenger cars

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS 4144 43 45

17 1518 17

3740

20 2116 16

15 17 18 19

7 6 9 8

14 15

5 5 5 5

HybridPlug-in Hybrid CNG LPG Battery Electric

VehicleFuel Cell

Electric /

Hydrogen

Bio ethanol

or other Bio

energy

36

LCV Fleet

ALTERNATIVE FUEL TECHNOLOGIES USAGE – DETAIL PER TECHNOLOGY



Basis: companies with corporate LCVs

LCVs

In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS

HybridPlug-in Hybrid CNG LPG Battery Electric

VehicleFuel Cell

Electric /

Hydrogen

Bio ethanol

or other Bio

energy

37

31 31 32 32

15 17 16 18

31 30

18 18 16 16

7 7 9 9 5 7 6 8 9 8 4 4 4 4

19

19

21

21

23

26

27

29

29

32

34

44

18

18

19

19

22

24

24

27

27

30

33

41

REASONS FOR IMPLEMENTING OR CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE FUEL TECHNOLOGIES

Why have you already implemented or why do you consider implementing alternative fuel technologies?

Basis: companies having implemented or considering Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid or Electric passenger cars

Passenger car fleet

In %

Passenger cars

Be able to drive during alternate

circulation period

The driving of these vehicle is very smooth and quiet

To cap the TCO (Total Cost of

ownership)

To fulfil your employees' requests

Reduce maintenance costs

Be able to drive in zone where more polluting vehicles are ban

For tax incentives

To be compliant with your CSR policy

Anticipate future restrictive public

policies

Improve your company image

To reduce fuel expenses

Limited carbon emissions and air pollution

38

13

14

14

14

18

18

18

20

21

25

23

27

13

14

15

15

18

19

19

21

22

24

24

29

REASONS FOR IMPLEMENTING OR CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE FUEL TECHNOLOGIES

LCV fleet

Why have you already implemented or why do you consider implementing alternative fuel technologies?

Basis: companies having implemented or considering Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid or Electric LCVs

LCVs

In %

To fulfil your employees' requests

The driving of these vehicle is very smooth and quiet

To cap the TCO (Total Cost of

ownership)

Be able to drive during alternate circulation period

Reduce maintenance costs

For tax incentives

Be able to drive in zone where more

polluting vehicles are ban

To be compliant with your CSR policy

Anticipate future restrictive public

policies

To reduce fuel expenses

Improve your company image

Limited carbon emissions and air pollution

39

4ENERGY MIX

FOCUS PER ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY

40





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS


43

18

36

57

48

41

53

40

54

43

54

45

64

16

3238 37

52 5046

17

32

1528

14 14 18 1622 20

31

14

29

5 9 1421 24 28

194 9

HYBRID IMPLEMENTATION

45

19

41

43 45

31 31

3740

4851

61 63

18 19

8 812 13

23 25

33 35

HYBRID IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS

TOTAL

42

PLUG-IN HYBRID IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS


41

16

36

57

45 4643

37

4842

51 50

63

11

22

3835

54 55

36

14

29

1426

18 1610 14 19 18

28

11

25

1 6 1121 25 27

11 2 7

43

17

43

41 43

28 29

3539

4550

61 63

16 17

7 711 12

20 22

2932

PLUG-IN HYBRID IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS

TOTAL

44

17

27

43

43

45

52

54

17

26

42

43

45

51

54

CONSTRAINTS OF PLUG IN HYBRID IMPLEMENTATION

What are the constraints of using plug-in hybrid vehicles?

Basis: companies not considering plug-in hybrid vehicles

30

do not consider implementing plug-in Hybrid vehicles


In %

Your employee’s reluctance to drive such vehicles

The questions raised on their reliability

The range of models is limited for this type of vehicles

No charging solutions at your

employees’ home

No charging points at your company offices

The number of public charging points.

The purchase price is higher than a regular fuel car

45

100% BATTERY ELECTRIC IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS


38

14

4147 45 46

4135

4036

56

4853

10

18

34

24

60

47

35

12

30

22 2316 17

918

12 14

31

13 164 3 10 9

2922

11 2 7

40

16

46

100% BATTERY ELECTRIC IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS 38 40

26 2631

34

4245

5962

14 16

7 7 10 1116 18

2832

TOTAL

47

20

30

47

48

48

57

58

19

29

45

47

47

56

57

CONSTRAINTS OF 100% BATTERY ELECTRIC IMPLEMENTATION

What are the constraints of using 100% Battery Electric vehicles?

Basis: companies not considering 100% battery electric vehicles

32

do not consider implementing battery electric vehicles


In %

Your employee’s reluctance to drive such vehicles

The questions raised on their reliability

The range of models is limited for this type of vehicles

No charging solutions at your

employees’ home

No charging points at your company offices

The purchase price is higher than a

regular fuel car

The number of public charging points.

48

FUEL CELL ELECTRIC IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS


21

35 3330

2519 21

18

28

19

36

6

15 16

5

24 24 25

11

21

6 14 9 5 6 4 8 4 9 2 8 2 6 2 8 7 6 7

22

6

22

6

49

FUEL CELL ELECTRIC IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS 22 22

16 1518 19

22 23

35 34

6 6 3 3 5 5 6 712 11

TOTAL

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

50

CNG IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS


19

8

14

2924

1720

10

28

915 14

18

1116

12 1014

21

44

2419

216 12 4 5 4 11 3 8 4 4 5 6 5 5 7 11

28

13 8

17

7

51

TOTAL

CNG IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS 19 1712 10

16 1520 19

3027

8 7 5 4 6 5 8 7

15 13

52

LPG IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS


19

10

13

30

2318 20

12

36

1116 18

21

9

31

128

1611

32

21

30

416

10 6 6 519

5 10 6 7 423

5 4 10 5 15 1124

18

9

53

TOTAL

LPG IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS 19 1814 14

17 1721 21

29 29

10 9 7 7 8 8 10 10

16 16

54

BIO ETHANOL OR OTHER BIO ENERGY IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS

UKPTES NODK SEFIBE NLLUFRCH ITDE CZ PLAT RUBR

15

31

23

1217 19 21

15 1613

20

3

13 139

1824

34

9

18

416

7 3 3 4 9 3 7 3 5 1 2 6 4 7 11 15 1 5

TR

17

6

17

6

55

TOTAL

BIO ETHANOL OR OTHER BIO ENERGY IMPLEMENTATION





In %

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR CONSIDER

NEXT 3 YEARS 17 1712 11

14 1419 19

27 26

6 6 4 4 4 4 6 6 10 10

56

WHAT ARE THE PERSPECTIVES IN TERMS

OF ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS ?

5

57

MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES LIST AND DEFINITIONS

RIDE SHARING BETWEEN EMPLOYEES: several employees in the same car for a journey to the same destination (Blablacar)

MOBILITY CARD PROVIDED BY THE EMPLOYER: employees can use it to book, pay, use any mobility mode available on their country (Xximo card…)

PRIVATE LEASE OR SALARY SACRIFICE (by private lease we mean the fact that an employee rents or lease a car on his own behalf. By salary sacrifice I mean the fact that an employee rents or lease a car via his employer)

OTHER 2 WHEELS SOLUTIONS (motorbike, motorized scooters,…) or micro-mobility (kick scooter)

PROVIDE MID-TERM RENTAL VEHICLES (a rental for between 1 to 24 months) to provide transport needs for an employee

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

AN APP TO BOOK MOBILITY SOLUTIONS (travel planning, payments for your transport...)

BIKE SHARING

CORPORATE CAR SHARING:the company makes available upon reservation vehicles for its employees via an external solution

MOBILITY BUDGET within a predefined budget usually granted by the employer allowing employees to choose any mobility mode that is available on the market

58

OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTATION

Do you allow mobility solutions in your car policy?

What have you already implemented and what will you implement in the next 3 years?

Response scale: Already using, considered in the next 3 years, not interested


ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

ALREADY

USING

In %

3532

43 42

22 22 23 23

44 42

31 29 29 2733

30 30 2934 32

1916

28 28

10 11 10 10

33 31

14 13 14 12 14 12 14 1318 17

CORPORATE

CAR SHARING

RIDE

SHARING

BIKE

SHARING

PUBLIC

TRANSPORT

MOBILITY

CARD

APP TO BOOK

MOBILITY

SOLUTIONS

PRIVATE

LEASE OR

SALARY

SACRIFICE

MID-TERM

RENTAL

VEHICLES

OTHER

2 WHEELS

SOLUTIONS

MOBILITY

BUDGET

59

of companies allow mobility solutions in their car policy30%

have already implemented at least one of the solutions below:64%

AT LEAST ONE ALTERNATIVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED




In %

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

ALREADY

USING


81 82 83

7167 67

79 78 7873 75 76

6661

6773

76

97

72

85

72 69 74

53 58 62 64 67 6760 62 67

50 5061

53 56

89

61

80

75

64

74

61

60

CORPORATE CAR SHARING IMPLEMENTATION




In %

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

ALREADY

USING


29

46

36

20

31 3339

19

3841

38

3036

2127

35

24

71

40

47

1326

177

21 18 1812

20 20 19 22 1810

1810 11

45

29 32

TR

35

19

32

16

61

TOTAL

CORPORATE CAR SHARING IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

3532

2218

31 29

39 37

5552

1916

11 8

1714

2219

3128

62

RIDE SHARING BETWEEN EMPLOYEES IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


44

5156

2721

44 43

5046 46 48

30

38 39

49 48

36

68

33

42

33 2837

16 12

30 2637

30 31 2923 20

26

4027 22

40

26 30

43

28

42

28

63

TOTAL

RIDE SHARING BETWEEN EMPLOYEES IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

43 42

3229

40 4146 47

60 58

28 28

22 20

27 2629 29

39 38

64

BIKE SHARING IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


25

46

30

21

12

2025

13

31

15

23

8

21 2117

22

30

40

5

17

1021 16

9 5 9 11 816

7 8 5 8 9 9 1018 13 1 9

TR

22

10

22

11

65

TOTAL

BIKE SHARING IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

22 22

14 1419 19

24 25

35 35

10 11 6 6 9 9 11 1217 18

66

OTHER 2 WHEELS SOLUTIONS OR MICRO-MOBILITY IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


23

10

27

41

32

22 2320

30

19

29

2218

9

19 18

11

2521

49

6

27

13 17 168 11 10 10 8 14 8 6 4 5 9 6 10 7

173 15

23

10

67

TOTAL

OTHER 2 WHEELS SOLUTIONS OR MICRO-MOBILITY IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

23 2319 17

20 2023 23

35 33

10 10 8 7 8 8 9 10

16 15

68

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


5459 59

4337

4036

4144

34

45

37 35 3338

42 40

79

31

52

41 41 44

27 29 3122 27

3625

34 3124 23

32 27 30

62

24

41

44

33

42

31

69

TOTAL

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

44 42

3430

39 38

47 47

61 61

33 31

2522

29 27

36 35

45 44

70

MOBILITY BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION

ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %





31

51

35

27 2825

42

24

3732

29

15

3125

20

27

16

59

3337

11

2519

10 14 13 14 15 15 11 12 9 11 12 11 6 5

30

1420

31

14

29

13

71

TOTAL

MOBILITY BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

31 29

2218

28 26

33 33

47 45

14 1310 8 10 10

15 14

22 21

72

MOBILITY CARD PROVIDED BY THE EMPLOYER IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


34

45

35

19

2823

33

20

2825 26 25 27

2116

2620

76

20

33

1522 18

616 12 11 10 10 5 10

198 7 6 9 11

55

819

29

14

27

12

73

TOTAL

MOBILITY CARD PROVIDED BY THE EMPLOYER IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

29 27

2017

27 2529 28

4643

14 12 10 713 11

1411

2219

74

AN APP TO BOOK MOBILITY SOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


28

4441

27 2932

40

21

28

36

29

22

32

2421

3128

67

33

42

1019 16

10 14 18 13 8 11 13 10 12 11 8 11 11 13

3220

28

33

14

30

12

75

TOTAL

AN APP TO BOOK MOBILITY SOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

3330

2117

28 26

35 33

5552

14 128 6 11 10

15 13

2724

76

PRIVATE LEASE OR SALARY SACRIFICE IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


30

14

29

42

32

2520 21

43

21

38

24

46

14

27 29

14

31

41

48

2228

1323

14 13 10 1019

1319

722

6 14 12 4 1218 23

13 16

29

13

77

TOTAL

PRIVATE LEASE OR SALARY SACRIFICE IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

30 29

20 19

28 2832 32

44 44

14 138 7

12 1216 16

23 22

78

MID-TERM RENTAL VEHICLES IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

USED OR

CONSIDERED

NEXT 3 YEARS

In %


34

46

35 34 3235

56

2834 34

40

18

31

2318

3024

54

27

41

20 22 21 21 19 24 23 18 17 1425

7 12 9 10 10 1325

1725

34

18

32

17

79

TOTAL

MID-TERM RENTAL VEHICLES IMPLEMENTATION




ALREADY

USING

ALREADY

IMPLEMENTED

OR USING NEXT 3

YEARS

In %

34 32

23 21

29 28

38 38

50 48

18 17

9 813 12

23 23

30 28

80

LIKELYHOOD TO GIVE UP PART / ALL FLEET FOR MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES

TOTAL Certainly or probably

Car sharing

Ride sharing

Private lease or salary

sacrifice

Mid-term rental

Mobility Budget

81

Would you anticipate that your company would give up all or part of the company car fleet for such alternatives?

. Basis: companies using or considering the mentioned mobility solution

In %

23

25

21

19

24

21

23

19

19

24

TOTAL

17

20

17

16

20

14

17

13

15

19

20

22

17

17

21

19

21

15

17

20

23

24

21

19

25

22

24

21

19

25

33

33

31

26

32

30

30

28

25

29

81

LIKELYHOOD TO GIVE UP PART / ALL FLEET FOR CAR SHARING


82

In %

18

3325

1323 24

31

8

28 29

08

2817 19 23

11

43

29 25


23

n.a.

21

82

21

3728

1117

2735

14

31 27

7

2919

26 2114

49

20 25

LIKELYHOOD TO GIVE UP PART / ALL FLEET FOR RIDE SHARING


83

In %


25

n.a.

23

83

LIKELYHOOD TO GIVE UP PART / ALL FLEET FOR MOBILITY BUDGET


84

In %

18

3427

1622 23

30

8

24 26

07

2212 12 16

10

44

1724


21

n.a.

19

84

LIKELYHOOD TO GIVE UP PART / ALL FLEET FOR PRIVATE LEASE OR SALARY SACRIFICE


85

In %

14

3325

17 19 18

34

8

2617

08

18 1711

20 15

33

1117


19

n.a.

19

85

LIKELYHOOD TO GIVE UP PART / ALL FLEET FOR MID TERM RENTAL


86

In %

2433

2621

28 30

45

1522

33

06

22 19 18 2212

40

17 21


24

n.a.

24

86

6

HOW COMPANIES ARE FINANCING

THEIR FLEET?

87

MAIN FINANCING METHOD

Proportion of companies using the following solutions as their main financing method

for their fleet vehicles

What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today?


Self purchase*

Car credit

Finance leasing

Operating leasing

*Self-purchase = outright

purchase + credit

(other than car credit)

Data have been consolidated:

3 years average


In %

40 3949 48

42 4034 33 31 29

10 9

15 14

109

6 5 54

23 24

22 24

2728

24 2421

21

27 29

13 1421 23

36 3843 46

TOTAL

88

MAIN FINANCING METHOD – SELF PURCHASE*




In %

4030

62

32 29 26 23 28

44 4149 51

43 42 4737 39

54 5548


40

*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)

data have been consolidated: 3 years average (except new countries: DK, FI, NO, SE, BR, RU)

39

89

2434

6

47 42 3928

38 42

1828

1910

27 23 20 209 4

16

MAIN FINANCING METHOD – FOCUS OPERATING LEASING




In %




90

26

28

5

186

38

15 17 13

34

19

1

17 133

157 8

175 6 2





In %



Focus on 1 to 9


13

15

91

19 23

3

36

20 25 2836 33

1527

12 1022 18 14 17

6 2

17





In %



Focus on 10 to 99


19

21

92

3340

5

56

3744

3846

54

2822 22

9

3630 32

25 21

3

18





In %



Focus on 100 to 249/499/999


30

33

93

4034

13

57

32

61

38 36

51

2632

23 19

3933

22 2314

211





In %



Focus on 250/500/1000 and more


31

35

94

INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASING

Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing

TOTAL

Yes,

certainly

In the next three years do you intend to introduce or increase use of

Operating Lease to finance your corporate fleet?


certainly +

probably


In %

39 31 34 42 52

37 29 32 42 50

80

13 8 10 15 20

12 8 10 15 19

95

Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing

In the next three years do you intend to introduce or increase use of Operating Lease to finance your corporate fleet?



In %

41 4434

26

5059

3344 46

26 22

4027 27 32

25

5947

40

UKPT NODK SEFIBE NLLUFRCH ITDE CZ PLAT TRRUBR

INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASING

39

37

96

7

WHAT ARE THE USAGES IN TERMS OF

TELEMATICS, DIGITAL TOOLS AND

ROAD SAFETY EQUIPMENTS?

97

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES USING TELEMATICS

Is your fleet connected thanks to Telematics tool? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour,

vehicle location, driver’s impact on environment... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales

equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones.

Basis: companies with corporate passenger cars / companies with corporate LCVs

YES, FOR ALL THE FLEET + YES, FOR PART OF THE FLEET


37%,of companies with fleet use telematics for all or part of their fleet. Among companies owning passenger cars, 31% use telematics for passenger cars, 23% use telematics for benefit cars, 23% for tool cars. Among companies owning LCVs, 32% use telematics for LCVs.

ALL VEHICLES Passenger cars

benefit cars Tool carsLCVs


In %

37 31 23 23 32

33 28 20 20 28

98


ALL VEHICLES

YES, FOR ALL THE FLEET + YES, FOR PART OF THE FLEET



equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis:

companies with corporate vehicles = 100%


In %

37 23 34 42 54

33 20 31 39 50

99

25

4836

23

3728

49

2837

29

4335 37

26 28 26 30

58 53 54





companies with corporate passenger cars


YES, FOR ALL THE FLEET + YES, FOR

PART OF THE FLEET

In %


3733

100

19

23

28

29

31

32

35

43

20

25

28

27

32

31

37

41

REASONS FOR USING TELEMATICS

What are the two main reasons why your fleet is connected thanks to Telematics tools?

Basis: companies with connected vehicles thanks to Telematics

All vehicles


In %

To optimize car sharing

To improve drivers behaviours

To improve drivers safety

To reduce fleet costs

To avoid not allowed usage

To improve operational efficiency

To locate vehicles or improve vehicle security

To reduce environmental impact

101

8TELEMATICS, DIGITALTOOLS AND ROAD SAFETY

A. PASSENGER CARS

102

19

3629

20

40

23

43

2233

2432

25 3023 19

25 27

47 4855


Passenger cars







PART OF THE FLEET

In %

Passenger cars

3128

103


Basis: companies

with at least one

passenger car in fleet





In %

Passenger cars


Among companies owning passenger cars, 48% use telematics.


PART OF THE FLEET

31 22 28 34 44

28 20 24 30 39

104



Basis: companies with connected passenger cars thanks to Telematics

12

16

19

21

22

22

23

32

13

18

19

22

20

20

24

28

Passenger cars

In %

Passenger cars









105

BARRIERS FOR USING TELEMATICS

What are the barriers to Telematics usage in the future?

Basis: companies with passenger cars which have not implemented Telematics

22

24

31

33

35

36

40

44

24

24

32

35

36

38

41

45

Passenger cars

In %

Passenger cars

You have some concerns that Trade

Unions or work councils may not accept it

You are not convinced that it works

You have some concerns on managing

the data under GDPR

You have some concerns that employees will not accept it

There is not enough resource available

to manage the data effectively.

Telematics is too intrusive for the drivers

You are not convinced that the data provided

will be useful for your business operation

You are not convinced that there will be a return on investment

106


B. BENEFIT CARS

107

12

3023

16

36

1830

1324

17 20 1625

14 14 15 17

41 38 38


Benefit cars






PROPORTION OF COMPANIES HAVING IMPLEMENTED

TELEMATICS IN THEIR BENEFIT CARS

In %

Benefit cars

2320

108


Basis: companies with

at least one passenger

car in fleet

TOTAL





In %

Benefit cars


PART OF THE FLEETHOW TO READ THE RESULTS ?

Among companies owning passenger cars, 38% use telematics for benefit cars.

23 16 21 24 33

20 14 19 21 28

109


Benefit cars

12

15

16

20

22

22

26

32

12

17

16

18

24

20

27

29


Basis: companies with connected benefit cars thanks to Telematics

In %

Benefit cars









110

BARRIERS TO TELEMATICS

Benefit cars

21

22

29

32

33

35

39

42

22

22

30

34

35

37

40

43

What are the barriers to Telematics usage in the future?

Basis: companies with benefit cars which have not implemented Telematics

In %

Benefit cars

You have some concerns that Trade

Unions or work councils may not accept it



the data under GDPR


There is not enough resource available

to manage the data effectively.


You are not convinced that the data

provided will be useful for your business

operation


111


C. TOOL CARS

112

1425

1911

35

17

31

1220 22

2921

2716 13 16 17

41

2538


Tool cars






PROPORTION OF COMPANIES HAVING IMPLEMENTED

TELEMATICS IN THEIR TOOL CARSIn %

Tool cars

2320

113



PART OF THE FLEET






Among companies owning passenger cars, 25% use telematics for tool cars


at least one passenger

car in fleet

TOTAL

In %

Tool cars

23 14 19 25 34

20 12 17 23 31

114

10

14

17

21

21

24

27

32

11

15

18

19

22

22

27

29


Tool cars


Basis: companies with connected tool cars thanks to telematics

In %

Tool cars









115

20

23

28

29

32

33

37

41

22

23

29

31

33

34

38

43


Tool cars

What are the barriers to telematics usage in the future?

Basis: companies with tool cars which have not implemented Telematics

In %

Tool cars

You have some concerns that Trade Unions

or work councils may not accept it



the data under GDPR



There is not enough resource available to manage the data effectively.

You are not convinced that the data

provided will be useful for your business

operation


116


D. LCVs

117

20

3731

2031

19

3427 32

26

47

31 3323 26

18 23

52 48 51


LCVs

PROPORTION OF COMPANIES HAVING

IMPLEMENTED TELEMATICS IN THEIR LCVS




companies with corporate LCVs


LCVs

In %

3228

118





companies with corporate LCVs

LCVs

In %


at least one LCV in fleet

TOTAL

In %HOW TO READ THE RESULTS ?

Among companies owning LCVs, 48% use telematics for LCVs


PART OF THE FLEET

32 19 28 35 47

28 17 26 30 42

119

10

13

19

19

22

23

27

37

11

14

19

17

23

22

29

34


LCVs


Basis: companies with connected LCVs thanks to telematics

LCVs

In %









120

19

25

27

28

32

36

39

46

20

25

28

30

33

37

39

47


LCVs

What are the barriers to telematics usage in the future?

Basis: companies with LCVs which have not implemented Telematics

LCVs

In %

You have some concerns that Trade Unions

or work councils may not accept it



the data under GDPR



There is not enough resource available to manage the data effectively.

You are not convinced that the data provided

will be useful for your business operation


121

T H A N K Y O U

Contact: YAËL BENNATHAN

[email protected]

2020 FLEET BAROMETER

Documents

Transcript of 2020 FLEET BAROMETER