2020 Commodity Outlook - FarmSmart · Roughly 10% of hay and grazing areas affected by drought June...
Transcript of 2020 Commodity Outlook - FarmSmart · Roughly 10% of hay and grazing areas affected by drought June...
-
2020 Commodity Outlook
Steve DuffChief Economist
OMAFRA
-
Overview US market situation and outlook
Canadian and Ontario Market Situation
Ontario Outlook
2
-
US Market Situation and Outlook
3
-
Parity Era
Target Price Era
Decoupled Era
Source: USDA-NASS
1933 AAA
1996 FAIR Act
US Farm Policy – Distinct Eras
4
Chart1
1933193319331933
1934193419341934
1935193519351935
1936193619361936
1937193719371937
1938193819381938
1939193919391939
1940194019401940
1941194119411941
1942194219421942
1943194319431943
1944194419441944
1945194519451945
1946194619461946
1947194719471947
1948194819481948
1949194919491949
1950195019501950
1951195119511951
1952195219521952
1953195319531953
1954195419541954
1955195519551955
1956195619561956
1957195719571957
1958195819581958
1959195919591959
1960196019601960
1961196119611961
1962196219621962
1963196319631963
1964196419641964
1965196519651965
1966196619661966
1967196719671967
1968196819681968
1969196919691969
1970197019701970
1971197119711971
1972197219721972
1973197319731973
1974197419741974
1975197519751975
1976197619761976
1977197719771977
1978197819781978
1979197919791979
1980198019801980
1981198119811981
1982198219821982
1983198319831983
1984198419841984
1985198519851985
1986198619861986
1987198719871987
1988198819881988
1989198919891989
1990199019901990
1991199119911991
1992199219921992
1993199319931993
1994199419941994
1995199519951995
1996199619961996
1997199719971997
1998199819981998
1999199919991999
2000200020002000
2001200120012001
2002200220022002
2003200320032003
2004200420042004
2005200520052005
2006200620062006
2007200720072007
2008200820082008
2009200920092009
2010201020102010
2011201120112011
2012201220122012
2013201320132013
2014201420142014
2015201520152015
2016201620162016
2017201720172017
2018201820182018
2019201920192019
2020202020202020
2021202120212021
2022202220222022
2023202320232023
2024202420242024
2025202520252025
2026202620262026
2027202720272027
2028202820282028
1973 A&CPA
Corn
Wheat
Column1
Column3
$/Bushel
0.494
0.736
0.802
0.839
0.632
0.827
1.03
1.02
0.49
0.959
0.469
0.556
0.542
0.686
0.601
0.674
0.736
0.939
0.894
1.09
1.08
1.35
1.03
1.41
1.23
1.49
1.53
1.9
2.16
2.29
1.28
1.98
1.24
1.88
1.52
2
1.66
2.11
1.52
2.09
1.48
2.04
1.43
2.12
1.35
1.98
1.29
1.97
1.11
1.93
1.12
1.75
1.05
1.76
1
1.74
1.1
1.83
1.12
2.04
1.11
1.85
1.17
1.37
1.16
1.35
1.24
1.63
1.03
1.39
1.08
1.24
1.16
1.25
1.33
1.33
1.08
1.34
1.57
1.76
2.55
3.95
3.02
4.09
2.54
3.55
2.15
2.73
2.02
2.33
2.25
2.97
2.52
3.78
3.11
3.91
2.5
3.66
2.55
3.45
3.21
3.51
2.63
3.39
2.23
3.08
1.5
2.42
1.94
2.57
2.54
3.72
2.36
3.72
2.28
2.61
2.37
3
2.07
3.24
2.5
3.26
2.26
3.45
3.24
4.55
2.71
4.3
2.43
3.38
1.94
2.65
1.82
2.48
1.85
2.62
1.97
2.78
2.32
3.56
2.42
3.4
2.06
3.4
2
3.42
3.04
4.26
4.2
6.48
4.06
6.78
3.55
4.87
5.18
5.7
6.22
7.24
6.89
7.77
4.46
6.87
3.7
5.99
3.61
4.89
3.36
3.89
3.3
4.6
3.25
4.99
3.52
5.1
3.6632300843
5.1134062117
3.764573876
5.1055377484
3.7174587494
5.1064828811
3.7179785775
5.1013560318
3.6923322544
5.0978986488
3.7346521505
5.1023733621
3.7193809145
5.1040906281
3.7009951793
5.1050286052
3.7004894468
5.1055259471
Sheet1
CornCottonWheatColumn1Column2Column3
1933$0.49$0.1020$0.74
1934$0.80$0.1240$0.84
1935$0.63$0.1110$0.83
1936$1.03$0.1240$1.02
1937$0.49$0.0840$0.96
1938$0.47$0.0860$0.56
1939$0.54$0.0910$0.69
1940$0.60$0.0990$0.67
1941$0.74$0.1700$0.94
1942$0.89$0.1910$1.09
1943$1.08$0.1990$1.35
1944$1.03$0.2070$1.41
1945$1.23$0.2250$1.49
1946$1.53$0.3260$1.90
1947$2.16$0.3190$2.29
1948$1.28$0.3040$1.98
1949$1.24$0.2860$1.88
1950$1.52$0.4010$2.00
1951$1.66$0.3790$2.11
1952$1.52$0.3460$2.09
1953$1.48$0.3230$2.04
1954$1.43$0.3360$2.12
1955$1.35$0.3230$1.98
1956$1.29$0.3180$1.97
1957$1.11$0.2970$1.93
1958$1.12$0.3320$1.75
1959$1.05$0.3170$1.76
1960$1.00$0.3020$1.74
1961$1.10$0.3290$1.83
1962$1.12$0.3190$2.04
1963$1.11$0.3220$1.85
1964$1.17$0.3110$1.37
1965$1.16$0.2940$1.35
1966$1.24$0.2180$1.63
1967$1.03$0.2670$1.39
1968$1.08$0.2310$1.24
1969$1.16$0.2200$1.25
1970$1.33$0.2200$1.33
1971$1.08$0.2820$1.34
1972$1.57$0.2730$1.76
1973$2.55$0.4460$3.95
1974$3.02$0.4290$4.09
1975$2.54$0.5130$3.55
1976$2.15$0.6410$2.73
1977$2.02$0.5230$2.33
1978$2.25$0.5840$2.97
1979$2.52$0.6250$3.78
1980$3.11$0.7470$3.91
1981$2.50$0.5430$3.66
1982$2.55$0.5960$3.45
1983$3.21$0.6660$3.51
1984$2.63$0.5890$3.39
1985$2.23$0.5630$3.08
1986$1.50$0.5240$2.42
1987$1.94$0.6430$2.57
1988$2.54$0.5660$3.72
1989$2.36$0.6620$3.72
1990$2.28$0.6820$2.61
1991$2.37$0.5810$3.00
1992$2.07$0.5490$3.24
1993$2.50$0.5840$3.26
1994$2.26$0.7200$3.45
1995$3.24$0.7650$4.55
1996$2.71$0.7050$4.30
1997$2.43$0.6620$3.38
1998$1.94$0.6170$2.65
1999$1.82$0.4680$2.48
2000$1.85$0.5160$2.62
2001$1.97$0.3200$2.78
2002$2.32$0.4570$3.56
2003$2.42$0.6300$3.40
2004$2.06$0.4470$3.40
2005$2.00$0.4970$3.42
2006$3.04$0.4840$4.26
2007$4.20$0.6130$6.48
2008$4.06$0.4910$6.78
2009$3.55$0.6480$4.87
2010$5.18$0.8460$5.70
2011$6.22$0.9350$7.24
2012$6.89$0.7570$7.77
2013$4.46$0.8380$6.87
2014$3.70$0.6570$5.99
2015$3.61$0.6120$4.89
2016$3.36$0.6800$3.89
2017$3.30$0.66$4.60
2018$3.25$0.68$4.99
2019$3.52$0.65$5.10
2020$3.66$0.66$5.11
2021$3.76$0.66$5.11
2022$3.72$0.66$5.11
2023$3.72$0.67$5.10
2024$3.69$0.68$5.10
2025$3.73$0.68$5.10
2026$3.72$0.68$5.10
2027$3.70$0.68$5.11
2028$3.70$0.68$5.11
-
Source: University of Illinois 2018
• 2018 Market Facilitation Payment (MFP) - Corn: payment of $0.01 per bu is about 0.29% of the current cash price of $3.41 per bu in the US - did little to retrace the roughly $0.60 per bulost since June. Soybeans: payment of $1.65 per bu is about 19% of the current cash price of $8.58 in the US – retraced a larger portion of the roughly $2 per bu lost since June
• As of November 18, 2019, USDA reports that MFP 2019 has paid $6.898 billion of the announced $14.5 billion; MFP 2018 is reported to have paid farmers $8.59 billion. MFP makes direct cash payments to farmers of select commodities and was created by the Trump Administration, not Congress.
US Corn and Soybean Prices during China Dispute
5
-
Source: WASDE
US Corn used for Ethanol
6
-
2018- 2019 Changes in US Corn Exports
Source: USDA-FAS
7
-
Source: USDA-FAS
2018- 2019 Changes US Soybean Exports
8
-
US 2019 Estimated Corn Yields
9
Source: USDA-NASS
PresenterPresentation NotesJune 2011 – 29% of US cow area in droughtNov 2013 over 50 percent of U.S. in drought Nov 2015: 14 percent of U.S. in drought
-
US 2019 Estimated Soybean Yields
10
Source: USDA-NASS
PresenterPresentation NotesJune 2011 – 29% of US cow area in droughtNov 2013 over 50 percent of U.S. in drought Nov 2015: 14 percent of U.S. in drought
-
US Drought Monitor
11
Less than 1% of corn & soybean areas affected by drought
Roughly 10% of hay and grazing areas affected by drought
PresenterPresentation NotesJune 2011 – 29% of US cow area in droughtNov 2013 over 50 percent of U.S. in drought Nov 2015: 14 percent of U.S. in drought
-
US Corn Supply-Disposition
Source: USDA - WASDE12
CORN2016/17 2017/18 2018/19
2019/20 as of Jan
2019 2020/21
Area Planted 94 90.2 88.9 89.7 94.5Area Harvested 86.7 82.7 81.3 81.5 87.1
Yield per Harvested Acre174.6 176.6 176.4 168.0 178.5
Beginning Stocks 1,737 2,293 2,140 2,221 1,893Production 15,148 14,604 14,340 13,692 15,545Imports 57 36 20 50 50 Supply, Total 16,942 16,933 16,500 15,963 17,488Feed and Residual 5,470 5,302 5,432 5,525 5,775Food, Seed & Industrial 2/ 6,885 7,054 6,791 6,770 6,870 Ethanol & by-products 3/ 5,432 5,600 5,376 5,375 5,725 Domestic, Total 12,355 12,356 12,223 12,295 12,645Exports 2,294 2,438 2,065 1,775 2,100 Use, Total 14,649 14,794 14,288 14,070 14,745Ending Stocks 2,293 2,139 2,221 1,893 2,743
Stocks-Use Ratio 15.7% 14.5% 15.5% 13.5% 18.6%
Avg. Farm Price ($/bu) 3.36 3.36 3.61 3.85 3.40
Million Acres
Bushels
Million Bushels
USDA Corn long-term projections as of October 2019
-
US Soybeans Supply-Disposition
Source: USDA - WASDE13
SOYBEANS2016/17 2017/18 2018/19
2019/20 as of Jan 2019 2020/21
Area Planted 83.4 90.1 89.2 76.1 84.0Area Harvested 82.7 89.5 87.6 75.0 83.2
Yield per Harvested Acre 52 49.3 50.6 47.4 50.5
Beginning Stocks 197 302 438 909 474Production 4,296 4,411 4,428 3,550 4,200Imports 22 22 14 15 20 Supply, Total 4,515 4,735 4,880 4,482 4,694Crush 1,901 2,055 2,092 2,105 2,135Seed 105 104 88 96 100Residual 41 8 43 32 32 Domestic, Total 2,047 2,167 2,223 2,233 2,267Exports 2,166 2,129 1,748 1,775 1,895 Use, Total 4,213 4,296 3,971 4,008 4,162Ending Stocks 302 439 909 474 532
Stocks-Use Ratio 7.2% 10.2% 22.9% 11.8% 12.8%
Avg. Farm Price ($/bu) 9.47 9.33 8.48 9.00 8.85
Million Acres
Bushels
Million Bushels
USDA Soybean long-term projections as of October 2019
-
U.S. Meat Production
Source: USDA - WASDE
14
-
US Cow Herd Size
15
US cow herd bottomed in 2014 and is now into a fifth year of expansion – some signal of contraction
PresenterPresentation NotesThe US beef industry starts with its cow herd
US cow herd has been declining in numbers for years. Bottomed in 2014 down 14% of 2000
A combination many events lead to this decline some of which we are still experriencing
Low cattle prices in the late 2000s were compounded by US ethanola policy that drove up the price of corn making cattle much more expensive to finish
This also made crop production significanlty more profitbale per acre and pulled acreage away from forages and pasture.
Starting in 2009, the US also began a period of almost unheard of dry weather and drought in its major cattle and cow regions pushing farmers to further liquidate their herds not just due to the price of feed but due to the availability of feed and pasture
The high in US cattle prices occurred in the fourth quarter of 2014. So, even though we’ll look back at 2015 as a good market historically, the cattle cycle is turning, US is expanding and prices will trend cyclically lower probably at least through 2018, 2019.”
Wont be back to past levels – hard to put fences back up or restore pastures
-
2018- 2019 Changes in US Beef Exports
Source: USDA-FAS
16
-
US Beef Supply-Disposition
17
Source: USDA - WASDE
Beef Units 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning stocks Mil. lbs. 757 649 662 675 Commercial production Mil. lbs. 26,187 26,944 26,948 27,670 Change from previous year Percent 3.8 2.9% 0.0% 2.7%
Farm production Mil. lbs. 63 66 66 66 Total production Mil. lbs. 26,250 26,938 27,014 27,736 Imports Mil. lbs. 2,993 2,998 3,030 2,870 Total supply Mil. lbs. 30,000 30,585 30,706 31,281 Change from previous year Percent 3.5 2.0% 0.4% 1.9%
Exports Mil. lbs. 2,860 3,161 3,126 3,305 Ending stocks Mil. lbs. 649 10.5% -1.1% 5.7%
Total disappearance Mil. lbs. 26,491 26,762 26,905 27,301 Per capita, retail weight Pounds 57 57.2 57.2 57.7 Change from previous year Percent 2.6 0.4% 0.0% 0.9%
Prices Steers, 5-area $/cwt 121.52 114.50 114.50 114.00 Feeder steers, Oklahoma City $/cwt 145.08 146.93 140.50 141.00
Cattle inventory 1,000 head 93,705 94,298 94,759 94,950Beef cow inventory 1,000 head 31,210 31,466 31,765 31,641Total cow inventory 1,000 head 40,559 40,898 41,119 41,000
USDA Beef long-term projections as of October 2019
PresenterPresentation NotesThe US beef industry starts with its cow herd
US cow herd has been declining in numbers for years. Bottomed in 2014 down 14% of 2000
A combination many events lead to this decline some of which we are still experriencing
Low cattle prices in the late 2000s were compounded by US ethanola policy that drove up the price of corn making cattle much more expensive to finish
This also made crop production significanlty more profitbale per acre and pulled acreage away from forages and pasture.
Starting in 2009, the US also began a period of almost unheard of dry weather and drought in its major cattle and cow regions pushing farmers to further liquidate their herds not just due to the price of feed but due to the availability of feed and pasture
The high in US cattle prices occurred in the fourth quarter of 2014. So, even though we’ll look back at 2015 as a good market historically, the cattle cycle is turning, US is expanding and prices will trend cyclically lower probably at least through 2018, 2019.”
Wont be back to past levels – hard to put fences back up or restore pastures
-
US Sow Herd Size
18
US sow herd bottomed in late 2013 and is now into a fifth year of expansion
PresenterPresentation NotesThe US beef industry starts with its cow herd
US cow herd has been declining in numbers for years. Bottomed in 2014 down 14% of 2000
A combination many events lead to this decline some of which we are still experriencing
Low cattle prices in the late 2000s were compounded by US ethanola policy that drove up the price of corn making cattle much more expensive to finish
This also made crop production significanlty more profitbale per acre and pulled acreage away from forages and pasture.
Starting in 2009, the US also began a period of almost unheard of dry weather and drought in its major cattle and cow regions pushing farmers to further liquidate their herds not just due to the price of feed but due to the availability of feed and pasture
The high in US cattle prices occurred in the fourth quarter of 2014. So, even though we’ll look back at 2015 as a good market historically, the cattle cycle is turning, US is expanding and prices will trend cyclically lower probably at least through 2018, 2019.”
Wont be back to past levels – hard to put fences back up or restore pastures
-
US Sow Herd Productivity
19
US productivity per litter has grown rapidly since 2006
PresenterPresentation NotesSimilar to the US, the prolonged impact of low returns, rising input costs and loss of pasture and forage land in favor of cash crops has pushed the Canadian and Ontario beef herds to its lowest levels in 20 years
Herd in Canada and Ontario have fallen close to 30% since 2005
In the last few years the rate of decline has slowed but cow numbers have yet to show a year over year increase. Upcoming STC release on cattle inventories will be interesting
Replacement heifer numbers have been flat of a couple years, Ontario showed a slight increase in numbers in 2015 but not enough for certainty. Again upcoming release will be key
So unlike the US, Canada and Ontario are not in a clear move that we know at this point
-
2018- 2019 Changes in US Pork Exports
Source: USDA-FAS
20
-
US Pork Supply-Disposition
21
Source: USDA - WASDE
Pork Units 2017 2018 2019 2020
Beginning stocks Mil. lbs. 507 554 559 590 Commercial production Mil. lbs. 25,584 26,315 27,578 28,680 Change from previous year Percent 2.6 2.9% 4.8% 4.0%
Farm production Mil. lbs. 14 15 14 14 Total production Mil. lbs. 25,598 26,330 27,592 28,694 Imports Mil. lbs. 1,116 1,042 956 915 Total supply Mil. lbs. 27,221 27,926 29,107 30,199 Change from previous year Percent 2.2 2.6% 4.2% 3.8%
Exports Mil. lbs. 5,632 5,876 6,580 7,300 Ending stocks Mil. lbs. 512 559 590 630
Total disappearance Mil. lbs. 21,077 21,491 21,937 22,269 Per capita, retail weight Pounds 50.2 50.9 51.7 52.1 Change from previous year Percent -0.1 1.4% 1.6% 0.8%
Prices National base, live equivalent $/cwt 50.48 45.93 49.00 58.00
Hog inventory, Total Hog Inventory 1,000 head 71,545 73,145 74,915 77,050
USDA Pork long-term projections as of October 2019
PresenterPresentation NotesThe US beef industry starts with its cow herd
US cow herd has been declining in numbers for years. Bottomed in 2014 down 14% of 2000
A combination many events lead to this decline some of which we are still experriencing
Low cattle prices in the late 2000s were compounded by US ethanola policy that drove up the price of corn making cattle much more expensive to finish
This also made crop production significanlty more profitbale per acre and pulled acreage away from forages and pasture.
Starting in 2009, the US also began a period of almost unheard of dry weather and drought in its major cattle and cow regions pushing farmers to further liquidate their herds not just due to the price of feed but due to the availability of feed and pasture
The high in US cattle prices occurred in the fourth quarter of 2014. So, even though we’ll look back at 2015 as a good market historically, the cattle cycle is turning, US is expanding and prices will trend cyclically lower probably at least through 2018, 2019.”
Wont be back to past levels – hard to put fences back up or restore pastures
-
Canadian & Ontario Market Situation
22
-
Ontario Crop Production
23
Field crop production stats in Ontario (2007-2019)Harvested Area (acre) in Ontario
5-yr CAGR 10-yr CAGR
Type of crop 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2014-2019 CAGR a
2009-2019 CAGR a
% change 2018 to
2019Winter Wheat 595,000 1,255,000 970,000 855,000 1,100,000 840,000 1,070,000 775,000 649,000 1,080,000 920,000 914,000 656,100 -3.3% -3.1% -0.7%Spring Wheat 180,000 195,000 128,000 132,000 115,000 89,000 80,000 80,000 125,000 119,000 90,000 81,500 95,000 3.5% -2.9% 16.6%Corn for grain 2,055,000 1,740,000 1,820,000 1,940,000 2,000,000 2,210,000 2,210,000 1,865,000 2,080,000 2,110,000 2,060,000 2,080,000 2,147,500 2.9% 1.7% 3.2%Canola 48,000 55,000 50,000 80,000 88,000 74,000 60,000 32,000 35,000 39,000 43,000 62,400 43,100 6.1% -1.5% -30.9%Soybeans 2,225,000 2,095,000 2,465,000 2,495,000 2,463,000 2,587,000 2,595,000 3,060,000 2,930,000 2,770,000 3,060,000 3,005,000 3,089,600 0.2% 2.3% 2.8%Dry White Beans 85,000 79,000 49,000 85,000 35,000 65,000 45,000 59,000 65,000 51,000 69,000 52,300 66,400 2.4% 3.1% 27.0%Dry Coloured Beans 74,000 54,000 47,000 60,000 52,000 55,000 45,000 64,000 65,000 70,000 61,000 65,200 79,000 4.3% 5.3% 21.2%a Compound Ave Growth Rate (CAGR)
Yield in Ontario5-yr CAGR 10-yr CAGR
Type of crop 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2014-2019 CAGR a
2009-2019 CAGR a
% change 2018 to
2019Winter Wheat 73.6 80.2 73.2 79.5 75 78.3 79.3 77.2 78.6 87.5 87.3 83.6 76.8 -0.1% 0.4% -4.2%Spring Wheat 51.1 49.5 50.6 52.3 52 55.1 52.2 56.3 64 52.9 46.7 54.3 58.5 0.8% 1.5% 7.7%Corn for grain 133.8 156.3 142.9 163.9 152 153.2 160.5 160.4 169 156.4 167 166 158.4 -0.3% 1.0% -4.6%Canola 34.7 40 39.4 41.6 36.9 36.5 36.7 43.1 42.9 41.9 46.5 47.1 43.2 0.0% 0.9% -8.3%Soybeans 33 43.4 40.2 46.1 47.6 48.3 45.9 45.5 46.8 45.5 45.6 51.4 44.1 -0.6% 0.9% -14.2%Dry White Beans 16.1 20.3 17.8 21.4 20 23.1 22.2 22.3 19.6 21.1 20.6 26.4 18.7 -3.5% 0.5% -29.2%Dry Coloured Beans 13.6 22.5 19.1 20.6 19.2 20 18.4 22.3 19.3 17 20.4 23.9 19.1 5.4% 0.6% 17.2%
Harvested area (acres)
Average yield (bushels per acre)
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/crops/estimate_hist_imp.xlsx
-
Ontario Crop Yield
24
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/crops/estimate_hist_imp.xlsx
PresenterPresentation NotesCanadian grain and oilseed prices in the medium term will be lower than the latest spike but do reach a higher plateau than the historical average.
-
Ontario Land Rental Rates
25
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/county/farmvalue.xls
Estimated Rental Rate per acre, Province, CAR, CD, 1991- 2016Source: 1991-2016, Census of Agriculture, Statistics Canada
Geography 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016Ontario 47 54 58 72 89 149Southern Ontario Region 78 92 103 123 143 227Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Municip 54 59 .. .. .. ..Hamilton Division .. .. 55 72 83 139Niagara Regional Municipality 72 70 63 128 108 168Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipa 73 81 84 114 135 231Brant County 69 84 92 113 137 226Oxford County 83 100 135 152 183 252Elgin County 71 35 97 115 124 197Chatham-Kent Division .. .. 154 157 186 292Essex County 89 101 112 125 144 226Lambton County 67 78 98 120 143 217Middlesex County 70 82 106 112 144 247Kent County 104 128 .. .. .. ..Western Ontario Region 42 49 59 74 94 156Peel County/ Regional Municipality 37 37 37 31 36 58Dufferin County 23 26 30 43 54 82Wellington County 38 42 54 62 90 151Halton County/ Regional Municipality 34 35 38 42 54 105Waterloo County/ Regional Municipal 59 66 107 112 116 196Perth County 71 93 115 159 191 312Huron County 63 82 108 121 155 251Bruce County 31 37 38 55 68 122Grey County 16 16 16 20 30 51Simcoe County 37 40 42 54 61 95
Source: 1991-2016, Census of Agriculture, Statistics CanadaGeography 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016Ontario 1.9% 2.3% 1.9% 1.7% 1.5% 1.6%Southern Ontario Region 3.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.3% 1.9% 1.9%Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Muni 0.9% 1.2% .. .. .. ..Hamilton Division .. .. 1.1% 0.9% 0.8% 1.0%Niagara Regional Municipality 1.1% 1.3% 1.0% 1.4% 0.9% 1.0%Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municip 3.5% 3.3% 2.6% 2.6% 2.2% 2.2%Brant County 2.3% 2.7% 2.3% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9%Oxford County 3.3% 3.0% 2.7% 2.2% 1.8% 1.5%Elgin County 3.7% 1.4% 2.8% 2.6% 2.1% 2.0%Chatham-Kent Division .. .. 4.2% 3.6% 2.8% 2.7%Essex County 3.1% 2.8% 2.3% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7%Lambton County 3.8% 3.4% 3.1% 2.9% 2.4% 2.2%Middlesex County 2.9% 2.8% 2.7% 2.2% 1.9% 2.0%Kent County 4.8% 4.3% .. .. .. ..Western Ontario Region 1.4% 1.9% 1.6% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3%Peel County/ Regional Municipality 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%Dufferin County 0.7% 1.1% 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 0.9%Wellington County 1.2% 1.6% 1.5% 1.2% 1.2% 1.3%Halton County/ Regional Municipalit 0.2% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.4%Waterloo County/ Regional Municip 1.8% 2.8% 3.7% 2.4% 1.7% 2.1%Perth County 2.1% 3.2% 3.0% 2.8% 2.4% 2.5%Huron County 0.5% 1.3% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.9%Bruce County 0.7% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8%Grey County 0.7% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%Simcoe County 2.2% 1.8% 1.2% 1.2% 0.9% 0.8%
Ratio of Estimated Rental Rate per acre to Estimated Value of Land per acre, Province, CAR, CD, 1991- 2016
PresenterPresentation NotesCanadian grain and oilseed prices in the medium term will be lower than the latest spike but do reach a higher plateau than the historical average.
-
Ontario Corn Basis
26
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/crops/weeklycornprice.xlsx
PresenterPresentation NotesCanadian grain and oilseed prices in the medium term will be lower than the latest spike but do reach a higher plateau than the historical average.
-
Ontario Soybean Basis
27
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/crops/weeklysoybeanprice.xlsx
PresenterPresentation NotesCanadian grain and oilseed prices in the medium term will be lower than the latest spike but do reach a higher plateau than the historical average.
-
Beef Imports
28
Beef imports are a major part of the Canadian supply chain and have returned to pre-BSE levels – 26%
Ontario imports close to 50% of beef consumption
PresenterPresentation NotesTalked about excess demand. Canada could roughly supply its own domestic demand for beef provided it didn’t export any cattle or beef products
For many producers and packers, exports provide a more profitable market than domestic sales – that’s the nature of trade
As a result, beef imports primarily from the US are needed to meet consumer beef demand. Close to 35% of Canadian beef consumed was imported prior to BSE and since BSE, the number has gradually climbed to 26%
Ontario as Canada’s largest market for beef but a smaller cattle production is even more pronounced with close to 50% and sometimes higher than 50% of beef consumed being from imports
A key strategy in economic growth is to replace imports of products that you already competitively produce, like beef
-
Canadian Cattle Slaughter
29
• Tight supply has lead to increasing carcass weights
PresenterPresentation NotesSo we had fewer fed cattle, excess demand for beef and record high fed cattle prices
To try and stem some of this issue, feedlots and packers all supported heavier cattle to help supply more beef overall
Carcass weights in the US, Canada and Ontario have all grown significantly as a result of this combination of events
Avg carcass weight in Canada was 809 lbs per fed animal and for 2015 this will show even highe
-
Ontario Cattle Slaughter
30
• Ontario cattle slaughter fell as cow numbers fell over time• Eastern Canadian processing capacity has changed as Quebec lost its
major plant, Ontario lost many provincial plants and Ontario fed cattle lost access to plants in the US
• Slaughter prices have fallen as US supplies have grown and Ontario packers processed more Ontario and Quebec cattle
PresenterPresentation NotesAs Ontario cow herd fell so has our slaughter numbers
Slaughter numbers havent fallen as much as cow numbers have because Ontario imports a large portion of its feeder cattle supply from western canada
Amount varies by season, year and farm but about 40% of Ontario”s total cattel slaughtered originate from western canada
This is simply a function of lack of calf supply coupled with excess demand for fed cattle due to excess demand for beef
So as the US beef supply contracted driving up beef and fed cattle prices, Ontario’s market move along in lock step and gave feedlot operators reord or near record prices
-
Retail Meat Prices
31
Growing demand for lean protein Beef demand continues to rise despite rising prices
PresenterPresentation NotesGrowing demand for lean protein and beefPrior to 2014, meat complex price increases relatively the sameIn 2014, beef and pork prices rose roughly 15% with ground beef rising nearly 25%2015 saw chicken and pork rise by roughly 3% compared to beef at about15% again
This story has mirrored in the US and as beef imports hit records in 2014, the industry was very concerend about permanently losing market share to imports.
-
Ontario Feeder Calf Basis
32
• Weekly basis calculations available on OMAFRA’s statistics website: www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/livestock/weeklycattleprice.xlsx
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/livestock/weeklycattleprice.xlsx
PresenterPresentation NotesAll of these things come together for strong demand through the entire beef value chain for Ontario product, right from processed beef all the way down to 500 pound calves
Like fed cattle, this has put cow-calf producers in a position for the last 2 years at least where they can enjoy the benefits of a strong US price and then tack on a weak dollar and crazy strong local demand for their calves.
-
Ontario vs Alberta Fed Cattle Slaughter Basis
33
• Ontario fed cattle prices post BSE were typically higher than in Alberta – higher basis
• Since 2016, with few outlets for Ontario fed cattle outside of Ontario and within Ontario, the basis has fallen relative to Alberta
PresenterPresentation NotesIts not always the case that the feedlot sector faces strong fed cattle prices out of the US and strong local demand
2014 and certainly 2015 broke that mold.
Feedlots thus benefited from a extremely strong basis and demand for their finsihed cattle and this along with the high US price and a weak Cdn dollar
However last few weeks of 2015 and now into 2016 has shown what thoughts of north american expansion can do and the local basis has dropped signifcantly to now below historical levels even despite a weak dollar
-
Ontario Fed Cattle Slaughter Basis
34
• Start of 2019 saw a historically weak basis largely due to concerns about access to China
• Closure of Ryding Regency has not significantly affected the overall basis • Data available to calculate basis doesn’t reflect the discounts many feedlots are
experiencing due to having to ship heavy cattle as a result of the backlog of cattle created by Ryding’s closure and more cull cows being processed
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/livestock/weeklycattleprice.xlsx
PresenterPresentation NotesIts not always the case that the feedlot sector faces strong fed cattle prices out of the US and strong local demand
2014 and certainly 2015 broke that mold.
Feedlots thus benefited from a extremely strong basis and demand for their finsihed cattle and this along with the high US price and a weak Cdn dollar
However last few weeks of 2015 and now into 2016 has shown what thoughts of north american expansion can do and the local basis has dropped signifcantly to now below historical levels even despite a weak dollar
-
Ontario Sow Herd Productivity
35
Ontario productivity per litter has grown rapidly since 2006 Ontario pigs born per litter exceed US by almost 2 pigs
PresenterPresentation NotesSimilar to the US, the prolonged impact of low returns, rising input costs and loss of pasture and forage land in favor of cash crops has pushed the Canadian and Ontario beef herds to its lowest levels in 20 years
Herd in Canada and Ontario have fallen close to 30% since 2005
In the last few years the rate of decline has slowed but cow numbers have yet to show a year over year increase. Upcoming STC release on cattle inventories will be interesting
Replacement heifer numbers have been flat of a couple years, Ontario showed a slight increase in numbers in 2015 but not enough for certainty. Again upcoming release will be key
So unlike the US, Canada and Ontario are not in a clear move that we know at this point
-
Ontario Hog Slaughter
36
• Total Ontario hog slaughter fell as sow numbers declined and has began to rise again
• Roughly 1.5 million market hogs go to Quebec for slaughter now
PresenterPresentation NotesAs Ontario cow herd fell so has our slaughter numbers
Slaughter numbers havent fallen as much as cow numbers have because Ontario imports a large portion of its feeder cattle supply from western canada
Amount varies by season, year and farm but about 40% of Ontario”s total cattel slaughtered originate from western canada
This is simply a function of lack of calf supply coupled with excess demand for fed cattle due to excess demand for beef
So as the US beef supply contracted driving up beef and fed cattle prices, Ontario’s market move along in lock step and gave feedlot operators reord or near record prices
-
Ontario Hog Slaughter
37
• Tight slaughter supply means a stronger basis• Movement of hogs to Quebec has pushed this also
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/stats/livestock/weeklyswineprice.xlsx
PresenterPresentation NotesIts not always the case that the feedlot sector faces strong fed cattle prices out of the US and strong local demand
2014 and certainly 2015 broke that mold.
Feedlots thus benefited from a extremely strong basis and demand for their finsihed cattle and this along with the high US price and a weak Cdn dollar
However last few weeks of 2015 and now into 2016 has shown what thoughts of north american expansion can do and the local basis has dropped signifcantly to now below historical levels even despite a weak dollar
-
Pork Imports
38
Pork imports are a major part of the Canadian supply chain
Ontario imports roughly 40% of pork consumption
PresenterPresentation NotesTalked about excess demand. Canada could roughly supply its own domestic demand for beef provided it didn’t export any cattle or beef products
For many producers and packers, exports provide a more profitable market than domestic sales – that’s the nature of trade
As a result, beef imports primarily from the US are needed to meet consumer beef demand. Close to 35% of Canadian beef consumed was imported prior to BSE and since BSE, the number has gradually climbed to 26%
Ontario as Canada’s largest market for beef but a smaller cattle production is even more pronounced with close to 50% and sometimes higher than 50% of beef consumed being from imports
A key strategy in economic growth is to replace imports of products that you already competitively produce, like beef
-
Ontario Market Outlook
39
-
40
Ontario G&O Price Trends, Outlook, and Returns
-
Using Feeder Futures and Basis – Looking Forward
• Here’s what feeder cattle futures on Nov 11, 2019 and a weekly five year average basis would suggest for Ontario 500-599 pound steer prices for the next year
41
-
Using Fed Cattle Futures and Basis – Looking Forward
• Here’s what fed cattle futures on Nov 11, 2019 and a weekly five year average basis would suggest for Ontario 1,250+ pound liveweight fed steer prices for the next year
42
-
43
Adapted from OMAFRA RMP feedlot farm sample
Ontario Cattle Price Trends, Outlook and Returns
PresenterPresentation NotesHog prices are expected to remain above the 2005-2009 average of $129.40/ckg.Fed steer prices are expected to remain close to the 2005-2009 average of $86.60/cwt.Feeder steer prices, however, are expected to be below the 2005-2009 average of $116.50/cwt.Livestock producers are also expected to face increasing cost of production, particularly feed costs.
-
Using Live Hog Futures and Basis – Looking Forward
44
-
Ontario Hog Price Trends, Outlook, and Returns
45
Adapted from OMAFRA RMP hog finishing farm sample
PresenterPresentation NotesHog prices are expected to remain above the 2005-2009 average of $129.40/ckg.Fed steer prices are expected to remain close to the 2005-2009 average of $86.60/cwt.Feeder steer prices, however, are expected to be below the 2005-2009 average of $116.50/cwt.Livestock producers are also expected to face increasing cost of production, particularly feed costs.
-
Highlights Long-term prospects for the ag sector continue to be bright. 2020 should see modestly higher US acreage for grains & oilseeds crops. US beef and pork production continues to grow while demand is growing –
adding strength to prices in the medium to longer term Unpredictability and volatility are likely to increase due to expansion of
livestock markets in the US and high level of stocks Weak Canadian dollar continues to largely shield Canadian farmers from
price weakness experienced in US. Ontario prices Farmers must continue to implement a number of strategies:
• pushing for production and cost efficiencies;• participating in business risk management programs;• hedging on commodity markets;• using available marketing tools;• ensuring credit is in place before it is needed; and,• reducing debt and increasing liquid assets.
46
Slide Number 1OverviewUS Market Situation and Outlook Slide Number 4Slide Number 5US Corn used for Ethanol 2018- 2019 Changes in US Corn ExportsSlide Number 8US 2019 Estimated Corn YieldsUS 2019 Estimated Soybean YieldsUS Drought MonitorUS Corn Supply-DispositionUS Soybeans Supply-DispositionSlide Number 14US Cow Herd Size2018- 2019 Changes in US Beef ExportsUS Beef Supply-DispositionUS Sow Herd SizeSlide Number 192018- 2019 Changes in US Pork ExportsUS Pork Supply-DispositionCanadian & Ontario Market SituationSlide Number 23Ontario Crop YieldOntario Land Rental RatesOntario Corn BasisOntario Soybean BasisSlide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Retail Meat Prices Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Slide Number 37Slide Number 38Ontario Market OutlookSlide Number 40Slide Number 41Slide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44Ontario Hog Price Trends, Outlook, and ReturnsHighlights