2017 Professional Practice Update · December 2016 3 701.076 EUR bn Growth rate 12 months 5.56% EUR...
Transcript of 2017 Professional Practice Update · December 2016 3 701.076 EUR bn Growth rate 12 months 5.56% EUR...
2017 Professional Practice Update
“Investment Fund Industry”
1 March 2017, Luxembourg
Agenda
08:30 – 09:00 Registration & breakfast
09:00 – 09:05 Chairperson’s opening remarks
Jason Rea, Chairperson, ABIAL
09:05 – 09:30 State of the Luxembourg Investment Fund Industry
Anouk Agnès, ALFI
09:30 – 10:00 Fund distribution evolution
Said Fihri, KPMG
10:00 – 10:30 Legal & regulatory update
Jérôme Wigny, Avocat, Elvinger Hoss Prussen
10:30 – 11:00 Coffee Break
1 March 2017 ABIAL - PPU 2
11:00 – 11:50 Panel discussion incl. Q&A
Brexit – practical implications and impact on fund industry
Moderator: Michael Ferguson, EY
Panel: Johan Terblanche, Dechert
Johan Schreuder, Investec
Revel Wood, FundRock
Sandrine Leclercq, Deloitte
11:50 – 12:20 Tax Update
Keith O’Donnell, ATOZ
12:20 – 12:30 Chairperson’s concluding remarks
Jason Rea, Chairperson, ABIAL
12:30 – 13:30 Buffet Lunch
Agenda
31 March 2017 ABIAL - PPU
State of the Luxembourg Investment Fund Industry
Anouk Agnès, ALFI
41 March 2017 ABIAL - PPU
Net assets of Luxembourg domiciled UCIs
Luxembourg market
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
3 000
3 500
4 000December 2016
3 701.076 EUR bn
Growth rate
12 months
5.56%
EUR billions
Figures as at December 31, 2016 Source: CSSF
Luxembourg market
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Net Subscriptions Market performance
Var./previous month Cumulative growth
over 12 months
Cumulative
net subscriptions
Cumulative
market performance
EUR billions
Components of net asset growth
Monthly evolution
over 12 months to date
Growth 5,56%
194.88 Eur Bn
96.13 Eur Bn
Market Performance (cumul)
Net sales (cumul)
98.75 Eur Bn
Figures as at December 31, 2016 Source: CSSF
Number of Luxembourg fund units
Luxembourg market
Number of Luxembourg domiciled funds
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Number of funds
growth rate
12 months
-0.44%
December 2016
3 861
Figures as at December 31, 2016 Source: CSSF
In a nutshellIn a nutshell
Luxembourg market
Sources: CSSF / Fundsquare
Funds Fund units Net Assets (EUR bn)
Total 3 861 14 211 3 701 .076
Part I (law 2010)1 869 9 805 3 116 .104
Part II (law 2010)353 937 160 .578
SIF (law 2007)1 639 3 469 424 .394
Period
since the previous month
YTD
over 12 months
Number of share classes
in December 2016
78 573
December 31, 2016
1.66%
5.56%
5.56%
Change in net assets
Market share
Figures as at September 30, 2016 Source: EFAMA
Luxembourg accounts for 37% of UCITS assets as at September 30, 2016
Germany 28.5 Luxembourg 36.6
France 17.8 Ireland 17.4
Netherlands 14.1 United Kingdom 12.6
Luxembourg 10.7 France 9.3
Others 29.0 Others 24.2
Total
AIFs EUR 5357 bn
Total
UCITS EUR 8345 bn
Top 4 countries
AIFs market (in %)
Luxembourg accounts for 37 % of UCITS assets
as at September 30, 2016
Top 4 countries
UCITS market (in %)
European UCIs = EUR 13702 bn
UCITS
61%
AIFs
39%
Asset AllocationAsset Allocation
Market share
Figures as at September 30, 2016 Source: EFAMA
UCITS61%
AIFs39%
EUROPE
UCITS84%
AIFs16%
LUXEMBOURG
Europe Luxembourg
11
European market
CountryTotal assets
under management
€ millions
Market share
in %Country
Total assets
under management
€ millions
Market share
in %
Luxembourg 3 621 929 26.4 Luxembourg 3 051 016 36.6
Ireland 1 944 220 14.2 Ireland 1 448 847 17.4
Germany 1 839 003 13.4 United Kingdom 1 049 932 12.6
France 1 729 240 12.6 France 774 880 9.3
United Kingdom 1 416 335 10.3 Switzerland 433 088 5.2
Netherlands 792 094 5.8 Germany 314 953 3.8
Switzerland 533 373 3.9 Sweden 264 969 3.2
Sweden 286 515 2.1 Italy 230 996 2.8
Italy 285 189 2.1 Spain 187 993 2.3
Denmark 269 139 2.0 Denmark 112 350 1.3
Others 984 634 7.2 Others 476 094 5.7
Total 13 701 671 100.0 Total 8 345 118 100.0
0
UCITS & AIFs UCITS
Figures as at September 30, 2016 Source: EFAMA
12
Net sales Q1-Q3/2016 – UCITS & AIFs
Net sales in Europe
Figures as at September 30, 2016 Source: EFAMA
TOTAL in EUR bn 337 100%
Luxembourg 94 28%
Other European MS 243 72%
28%
72%
Luxembourg
Other European MS
2.
Three pillars of the Luxembourg
Fund Industry
14
Cross-border fund distribution
Source : Lipper LIM & PwC analysis as at December 31, 2015 (Poster PwC March 2016)
4 5294 875
5 170
5 907
6 525
7 366 7 4417 907
8 511
9 4369 869
10 430
11 222
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
0
10 000
20 000
30 000
40 000
50 000
60 000
70 000
80 000
90 000
100 000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Luxembourg Ireland UK France Jersey Other Number of true
x-border funds
Number of cross-border registrationsNumber of cross-border funds
Cross-border fund distribution
65
22
4
3
2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
LU
IE
FR
JE
UK65 % of all UCITS
registered in at least 3 countries
(including home state) are Luxembourg funds
in %
Source : Lipper LIM & PwC analysis as at December 31, 2015 (Poster PwC March 2016)
Principal markets for distribution of Luxembourg investment funds (in terms of the number of registrations)
Cross-border fund distribution
Source : Lipper LIM & PwC analysis as at December 31, 2015 (Poster PwC March 2016)
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
Germ
an
y
Sw
itzerl
an
d
Au
str
ia
Fra
nce
Un
ite
d K
ing
do
m
Neth
erl
an
ds
Sp
ain
Italy
Sw
ed
en
Fin
lan
d
No
rway
Belg
ium
Sin
gap
ore
Den
ma
rk
Irela
nd
Po
rtu
gal
Gre
ece
Ch
ile
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Lie
ch
ten
ste
in
DE CH AT FR UK NL ES IT SE FI NO BE SG DK IE PT GR CL HK LI
Americas
Asia Pacific
Europe
Luxembourg market share of foreign cross-border funds registered for sale
Cross-border fund distribution
Source: Global Fund distribution analysis – March 2016
Peru, 46%
Chile, 60%
Germany, 59%
France, 61%
Switzerland, 65%
Bahrain, 76%
Singapore, 69%
South Korea, 94%
Japan, 55%
Taiwan, 76%Hong Kong, 74%
Poland, 95%Denmark, 62%
Finland, 65%
Norway, 70%
Sweden, 64%
Number of AIFMs 840
• Authorized AIFMs 235
• Registered AIFMs 605
Number of Special Limited Partnerships 1297
AIFMs
As at November 2016
19
Net sales of AIFs
143,7
67,1
24,219,8
13,6
- 0,7- 2,4
22,0
-25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Europe Germany Netherlands Luxembourg Ireland Denmark UnitedKingdom
Others
EUR billions
Net sales of AIFs per fund domicile
in Q1-Q3/2016
Figures as at September 30, 2016 Source: EFAMA
Responsible Investing (RI) funds themes
Responsible investing funds
Cross-themes
funds
ESG
Thematic Funds
RI screened
(Best-in-class,
Engagement)
ESG
(environmental)ESG
(social)
ESG
(governance)
Climate change
and Renewable
energy Funds
Environmental
and Ecological
funds
Carbon funds
Sustainable
forestry funds
Sustainable
water funds
Impact funds
(across thematic funds and cross-themes funds ESG)
Microfinance
funds
Social
Entrepreneurship
& Solidarity funds
Venture
philanthropy
Engagement
The boundaries of « mission-related finance »
Grant Money
Dependent
Cost
Recovering
« coincidental
» Financial
Return
Financal
Return
Because of
Social USP
Pos.
Correlation
social/environ.
Impact and
fin. Return
Socially/Policy
Neutral
Business
Models
Neg. Corr.
Social/env.
Impact and
fin. return
Environmental- / Social Impact-driven Investors
Impact Investing
Charity/
Philanthropy
Financial-Return-Oriented Investors
Philanthropy
(Financial)
Investors
with Social
Objectives/
Strategic
Value
Investors
(Exclusively) financial-Return-
Oriented Investors
Source: Uli Grabenwarter 2008, 2010
© Uli Grabenwarter
2014
Impact Investing – what it is and what it is not
IMPACT
investing
Profit - Orientated
Intentional - Impact
Measureble - Impact
Positive Correlation
between Impact and
Financial Return
Net Positive Impact
© Uli Grabenwarter
2014
Impact Investing – what it is and what it is not
Yes
Possibly
No
No
Possibly
« Traditional » Investing
Profit - Orientated
Positive Correlation
between Impact and
Financial Return
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Impact Investing
Intentional Impact
Measureable Impact
Net Positive Impact
© Uli Grabenwarter
2014
Impact investing is instrument-agnostic but…
• Most suited for impact investing because of extensive control and decisions rights for private equity investorsPrivate Equity
• Monst difficult approach to impact investing becauseof lack of influence of small scale investors (origin of Active Shareholders Movement)
Public Equity
• Impact investing strongly present in microcreditactivities
• Impact investing accessible for traditional debt but need for project-finance-type of covenants
Debt Instruments
© Uli Grabenwarter
2014
3.
Current priorities
ALFI 2020 ambition:
serving the interests of investors and the economy
ALFI’s key objectives:
Promote practices that align the interests of investors and
industry
Articulate the essential role of investment funds for the global
economy
Connect investors with worldwide market opportunities
Ensure Luxembourg remains the fund centre of choice for asset
managers
Stimulate innovation, research, education and talent development
The way forward
Legal toolbox BREXIT
Macro drivers affecting the
asset management
industry
X-border distribution
Ongoingregulatory
agenda
Diversification
- LPs
- RAIF
- Climate
Finance...
- MiFID II
- PRIIPs
- CMU
- BEPS
- Growing middle class
- Infrastructure needs
- Alternative and “passive
on the rise
- Pressure on margins
- Pension funds deficits
- Digitalization
Brasil
CVM has extended the limits for overseas investment:
a) Equity and fixed-income funds for retail investors: the limit has doubled to 20%;
b) Multimarket funds (hedge funds): the limit is kept the same at 20%;
c) Funds exclusively designed for qualified investors: the upper limit is set at
40% but can reach 100% if certain rules are observed.
d) Funds exclusively designed for professional investors: there is no limit.
Philippines
Set of rules drafted by the SEC to allow fund houses to offer feeder funds in order to
follow the Southeast Asian market trends (Thailand, i.e)
Should act as a catalyst for growth and allow fund houses to diversify their range of
foreign-invested funds
Central bank of Philippines also created a task force to allow the investment
possibilities by their UITFs in derivatives (only allow for hedging purposes at this point).
New frontiers
Australia
ALFI has negotiated an exemption from the obligation to hold an Australian financial
services (AFS) licence to provide financial services in Australia. The exemption applies
to Chapter 15 Management Companies and Self-Managed SICAVs regulated by the
CSSF.
This relief will enable Australia’s institutional investors, including superannuation funds
(pension funds), to get easier access to Luxembourg UCITS.
The Australian regulator (ASIC) can exempt a foreign financial services provider from
the requirement to hold a licence on the twofold condition that the financial services are
provided to wholesale (institutional) clients only and that these financial services are
regulated by an overseas regulatory authority.
The regulatory regime overseen by the relevant overseas regulatory authority needs to
be ‘sufficiently equivalent’ to the Australian regulatory regime and effective cooperation
arrangements must also exist before relief is granted.
ASIC and the CSSF have therefore signed an MoU on mutual cooperation and the
exchange of information related to the supervision of regulated entities in September
2013.
New frontiers
InFiNe
One among many stakeholders
ALFI Upcoming events
Proposed amendments to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)
MiFID is a framework for investment services and financial activities in the EU. It includesprotection rules for the investors and operating rules for trading venues
Transposition in national legislation by July 2017, entry into force in January 2018
From a fund distribution perspective, two major impacts:
Retrocessions and trailers fees (“inducements”) to independent distributors no longerpermitted
Product manufacturers (management companies) must define the target markets andtypes of investors to whom funds will be distributed
Impact on open architecture?
New distribution channels ? Robo advice, passive funds and ETFs, direct distribution byasset managers
MiFID II
MiFID II
Ban on Inducements
“Any fee, commission paid or received by an investment firm or any monetary
or non-monetary benefit provided or being provided in connection with the
provision of an investment service or an ancillary service, to or by any party
except the client or a person acting on behalf of the client”.
1. Definition
When providing portfolio management or investment advice on an independent
basis, the investment firm shall not accept and retain any monetary or non-monetary
benefits except minor non-monetary benefits.
2. Independent Advice No Inducement Permitted
(…) “It enhances the quality of services for investors and they do not impair
compliance with the investment firm’s duty to act honestly, fairly and
professionally in accordance with the best interest of its clients”
3. Dependent Advisers Inducements Permitted under Condition
MiFID II
Target Market: 6 Criteria
Client
Type
Knowledge
Experience
Financial Situation
Risk Tolerance
Client’s Objective
s
Client’s Needs
Proposed Regulation of the European Parliament and Council on Key Information Documents forPackaged Retail Investment Products
In essence, PRIIPs is a laudable initiative. Aim is to extend the concept of the UCITS KIID toall ‘packaged retail products’, in order to create a level playing field in terms of productdisclosures and to facilitate comparability between competing products, allowing retailinvestors to make better informed investment decisions
The proposals focus on product disclosures and sales processes for all packaged retailinvestment products
The Commission considers that the 'Key Investor Information Document' (KIID), agreed forUCITS forms a good benchmark for other packaged retail investment products
PRIIPs scope includes the following products: investment funds (both UCITS and non-UCITSfunds sold to retail investors), certain insurance products (investment based insuranceproducts) and certain banking products (structured products in particular)
When?
AIFs/ non-UCITS, structured products, insurance products: January 2018
UCITS: KIID replaced by PRIIPs in January 2020
PRIIPs
Q&A