2017-18 Budget Statement - Troy High School€¦ · 2017-18 Budget Statement . Account Description...

2017-18 Budget Statement

DescriptionAccount

Budgeting Appropriation Status Report For 2017-18 General Fund Expenditures (Detail) By ST3 Account

2017 - 18 Proposed

Budget

ENLARGED CITY SCHOOL

A1010.4 Contractual And Other 30,000.00

A1010.45 Materials And Supplies 1,000.00

A1040.16 Noninstructional Salaries 52,569.00




A1240.15 Instructional Salaries 204,281.00


A1240.2 Equipment 1,000.00





A1310.2 Equipment 5,000.00



A1310.49 Boces Services 130,916.47








A1430.2 Equipment 1,000.00




04/27/2017 03:18 PM 1/6Page

DescriptionAccount


2017 - 18 Proposed

Budget




A1620.16 Noninstructional Salaries 1,496,113.00

A1620.2 Equipment 40,000.00

A1620.4 Contractual And Other 1,707,350.00




A1621.2 Equipment 150,000.00






A1680.2 Equipment 240,000.00



A1680.49 Boces Services 1,829,063.42

A1910.4 Unallocated Insurance 380,000.00

A1920.4 School Association Dues 20,000.00

A1964.4 Refund On Real Property 100,000.00

A1981.49 Boces Administrative 477,361.00

A1989.4 Unclassified 20,000.00



A2010.2 Equipment 24,764.00



04/27/2017 03:18 PM 2/6Page

DescriptionAccount


2017 - 18 Proposed

Budget


A2020.15 Instructional Salaries 2,142,652.60








A2110.12a Teacher Salaries, Full Day K-3

5,870,698.80

A2110.12b Teacher Salaries 4-6 3,712,689.70

A2110.13 Teacher Salaries, 7-12 7,658,725.00

A2110.14 Substitute Teacher 938,000.00


A2110.2 Equipment 741,000.00



A2110.471 Tuition Paid To Public Dists In Nys

200,000.00

A2110.473 Paymts To Charter Schools 11,715,900.00

A2110.48 Textbooks 585,800.00

A2110.49b Other Boces Services - Non Lep

63,661.06

A2250.15 Instructional Salaries 7,481,934.18


A2250.2 Equipment 8,000.00



A2250.471 Tuition Paid To Public 300,000.00

04/27/2017 03:18 PM 3/6Page

DescriptionAccount


2017 - 18 Proposed

Budget


A2250.472 Tuition - All Other 3,350,000.00

A2250.473 Paymts To Charter Schools 319,635.00

A2250.49 Boces Services 4,761,794.45


A2280.2 Equipment 15,400.00






A2330.49a Boces Services (Including Eq Att

198,132.23


A2610.2 Equipment 2,500.00



A2610.46 School Library A/V Loan 34,250.00





A2630.22 State-Aided Computer Hdware - Purchase

150,000.00


A2630.46 State-Aided Computer Software

75,000.00


A2630.4a State-Aided Computer Hdware - Lease

150,000.00


04/27/2017 03:18 PM 4/6Page

DescriptionAccount


2017 - 18 Proposed

Budget



A2805.45 Materials And Supplies 500.00






A2815.2 Equipment 3,500.00







A2855.2 Equipment 10,000.00



A5510.16b Noninstructional Salaries (Trans Supervi

92,350.40

A5510.2 Equipment 5,000.00



A5510.49a Boces Bus Driver Training 386.25

A5540.4 Contract Transportation 5,972,610.00

A5550.4 Public Transportation 10,000.00

A5581.49 Transportation From Boces 300.00



A9010.8 State Retirement 1,413,120.00

04/27/2017 03:18 PM 5/6Page

DescriptionAccount


2017 - 18 Proposed

Budget


A9020.8 Teachers' Retirement 3,434,049.80

A9030.8 Social Security 3,478,689.14

A9040.8 Workers' Compensation 600,000.00

A9050.8 Unemployment Insurance 45,000.00

A9060.8 Hospital, Medical And Dental

15,580,100.00

A9711.6 Serial Bonds - School 5,355,000.00

A9711.7 Serial Bonds - School 3,246,258.00

A9730.7 Bond Anticipation Notes 125,000.00

A9901.95 Transfer To Special Aid 135,000.00

A9950.9 Transfer To Capital Funds 100,000.00

Grand Totals: 112,018,797.00

04/27/2017 03:18 PM 6/6Page

491700 - Enlarged City School District of TroyContact Person: Adam Hotaling Budgeted Proposed Budget Percent

Telephone Number: 518-328-5005 2016-17 2017-18 Change

(A) (B) (C)

112,909,509 112,018,797 -0.79%

36,109,217 36,273,420

0 0

0 0

0 0

36,109,217 36,273,420 0.45%

1,035,555 1,018,015

35,120,391 35,255,405

35,073,662 35,255,405

46,729 0

4,666 4,726 1.29%

1.26%

Actual Estimated

2016-17 2017-18

(D) (E)

3,866,803 4,757,740

12,425,000 9,250,000

4,516,380 4,480,752

4.00% 4.00%

2017-18 Property Tax Report Card

Assigned Appropriated Fund Balance

Public School Enrollment

G. School Tax Levy Limit , Excluding Levy for Permissible Exclusions 3

A. Proposed Tax Levy to Support the Total Budgeted Amount 1

B. Tax Levy to Support Library Debt, if Applicable

C. Tax Levy for Non-Excludable Propositions, if Applicable 2

D. Total Tax Cap Reserve Amount Used to Reduce Current Year Levy, if Applicable

Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance as a Percent of the Total Budget

Total Budgeted Amount, not Including Separate Propositions

H. Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy, Excluding Levy to Support Library Debt and/or Permissible Exclusions (E - B - F + D)

Adjusted Restricted Fund Balance

Consumer Price Index

I. Difference: (G - H); (negative value requires 60.0% voter approval) 2

Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance

F. Permissible Exclusions to the School Tax Levy Limit

E. Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy (A + B + C - D)

1 Include any prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.

2 Tax levy associated with educational or transportation services propositions are not eligible for exclusion under the School Tax Levy Limit and may affect voter approval requirements.

3 For 2017-18, includes any carryover from 2016-17 and excludes any tax levy for library debt or prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.

PTRC 2017-18 4/27/2017

4/27/2017 New York State Education Department State Aid Management System (SAMS)

https://eservices.nysed.gov/sams/printForm.do?method=printForm&fsId=826&segmentKey=1493320924058 1/4

Salary: Administrative Compensation Information 20162017 Page 1491700 TROY CITY SD Official as of 04/27/2017 03:22 PM

Form Due May 8, 2017 20172018 Salary Threshold =$132,000

In response to legislative efforts to encourage greater cost sharing in service provision and local government administration, we nowprovide a section for districts that share administrative staff to highlight these efforts for the upcoming school year. Each sharing districtshould identify in the form the other district(s) with which they will be sharing administrative staff for school year 20172018.

If you will be sharing a Superintendent, list the other district (or districts) in the text box. If you will be sharing other administrative staffrequired to be reported, please send an email to [email protected] indicating the title of the staff persons(s) as well as the otherdistrict(s) involved in the costsharing.

The salaries, benefits and other compensation reported in the form should reflect only the financial support or commitment that yourdistrict will be making. They should not reflect the total amounts budgeted to be paid by all participating districts over the school year.

Report Estimated Salaries in the Budget for the 20172018 School Year

Sections 1608 and 1716 of the Education Law (Please read the instructions and definitions before completing this form.)

Title Salary EmployeeBenefits

OtherRemuneration

1. Superintendent of Schools 197,281 69,048

Please list the district or districts with whichyou will be sharing a superintendent (ifapplicable):

Associate, Assistant and Deputy Superintendents (Example Titles: Associate Superintendent for Instruction, Deputy Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent for Business, etc.)

2. ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR INSTRUCTION147,625 51,6693. ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR BUSINESS 136,680 47,8384. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29.



30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Salary: Administrative Compensation Information 20162017 Page 2491700 TROY CITY SD Official as of 04/27/2017 03:22 PM

Title Salary EmployeeBenefits

OtherRemuneration

37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. Salary: Administrative Compensation Information 20162017 Claim Year Page 3491700 TROY CITY SD Official as of 04/27/2017 03:22 PM

Other Supervisory and Administrative Employees Scheduled to Receive $132,000 or More in Salary

71. EXECUTIVE PRINCIPAL 141,984 72. PRINCIPAL 138,374 73. PRINCIPAL 137,171 74. PRINCIPAL 133,561 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82.



83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. Salary: Administrative Compensation Information 20162017 Claim Year Page 4491700 TROY CITY SD Official as of 04/27/2017 03:22 PM113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142.



143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. Salary: Administrative Compensation Information 20162017 Page 5491700 TROY CITY SD Official as of 04/27/2017 03:22 PM158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184. 185. 186. 187. 188. 189. 190.

FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (2015 - 16)

INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (2014 - 15)(Data are lagged a year.)

Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts

and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.

The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the

Student Information Repository System (SIRS).

THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT

GENERAL EDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES

$53,636,462

PUPILS

4,674

EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL

$11,475

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$23,433,798

PUPILS

769


$30,473

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPHIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY URBAN OR SUBURBAN

GENERAL EDUCATION


$2,396,445,725

PUPILS

211,305


$11,341

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$1,036,534,896

PUPILS

33,554


$30,892

1 of 4

ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


$31,780,970,752

PUPILS

2,659,777


$11,949

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$13,848,179,596

PUPILS

451,571


$30,667

Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and

instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as

transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all

pupils, including those classi ed as having disabilities and those not classi ed, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but

attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education

program.

Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-

level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus

students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both

general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may bene t students not classi ed as having disabilities.

TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL


$20,907

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP

$21,153

NY STATE

$22,556

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as

expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education

and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.

2 of 4

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 27, 2017, 3:56 PM EST

INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2015 - 16)Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classi cation rate of students with

disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below.

STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULARCLASSROOM)

THIS SCHOOLDISTRICT

80% OR MORE

433 58.5%

40% - 79%

87 11.8%

LESS THAN 40%

149 20.1%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

55 7.4%

OTHER SETTINGS

16 2.2%

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPHIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY URBAN

OR SUBURBAN

80% OR MORE

46.5%

40% - 79%

18.9%

LESS THAN 40%

24.5%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

6.9%

OTHER SETTINGS

3.1%

NY STATE

80% OR MORE

58.2%

40% - 79%

11.7%

LESS THAN 40%

19.9%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

5.3%

OTHER SETTINGS

5.1%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and veri ed in Veri cation Report 5. The counts are numbers of

students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on BEDS Day, which is the rst Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages

represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of

percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE


15.3%

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP

12.7%

NY STATE

14.7%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are

parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)

responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed

students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the

Basic Education Data System (BEDS).

Similar District Groups are identi ed according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page.

3 of 4

http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/2011-12/NeedResourceCapacityIndex.pdf

4 of 4

TROY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2015 - 16]

TROY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)K-12 ENROLLMENT 3,960

ENROLLMENT BY GENDERMALE

2,005 51%

FEMALE

1,955 49%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITYGROUP

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

TOTAL

7

1,240

627

73

1,783

230

PERCENT

0%

31%

16%

2%

45%

6%

OTHER GROUPSENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

100 3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

658 17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

2,883 73%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADEGROUP

PRE-K (FULL DAY)

K (FULL DAY)

1ST GRADE

2ND GRADE

3RD GRADE

4TH GRADE

5TH GRADE

6TH GRADE

UNGRADED ELEMENTARY

7TH GRADE

8TH GRADE

9TH GRADE

10TH GRADE

11TH GRADE

12TH GRADE

UNGRADED SECONDARY

TOTAL

273

317

345

326

313

287

281

226

23

308

273

324

343

300

277

17

PERCENT

7%

8%

9%

8%

8%

7%

7%

6%

1%

8%

7%

8%

9%

8%

7%

0%

1 of 48

AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (2015 - 16)

ATTENDANCE (2014 - 15)

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2014 - 15)

TEACHER TURNOVER RATE (2014-15 TO 2015-16)

GROUP

COMMON BRANCH

GRADE 8 ENGLISH

GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS

GRADE 8 SCIENCE

GRADE 8 SOCIAL STUDIES

GRADE 10 ENGLISH

GRADE 10 MATHEMATICS

GRADE 10 SCIENCE

GRADE 10 SOCIAL STUDIES

CLASS SIZE

21

23

19

22

25

26

23

25

23

FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2015 - 16)ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH

2,676 68%

ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH

207 5%

ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE90%

358 9%

2 of 48

STAFF COUNTS (2015 - 16)

TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS (2015 - 16)

GROUP

PRINCIPALS

ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS

OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF

PARAPROFESSIONALS

STAFF

8

4

66

109

TOTAL TEACHERS 341

PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE 0%

PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE 0%

PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 8%

PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE 16%

TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES 699

PERCENT NOT TAUGHT BY HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS IN THIS DISTRICT 0%

TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES 1,245

PERCENT TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION 0%

3 of 48

HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETERS (2015 - 16)GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

272

235

37

GRADUATES (REGENTS + LOCAL DIPLOMAS)

267

235

32

REGENTS DIPLOMA

252 94%

233 99%

19 59%

GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION

58 22%

58 25%

0 0%

REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT

11 4%

11 5%

0 0%

LOCAL DIPLOMAS

15 6%

2 1%

13 41%

COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS

5 2%

0 0%

5 14%

4 of 48

HIGH SCHOOL NON-COMPLETERS (2015 - 16)GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


DROPPED OUT

5 0%

_ _

_ _

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION

PROGRAM

0 0%

_ _

_ _

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

5 0%

_ _

_ _

5 of 48

GROUPTO

FOUR-

YEAR

COLLEGE7427%7331%13%

TO

TWO-

YEAR

COLLEGE15958%13557%2465%

TO

OTHER

POST-

SECONDARY73%52%25%

TO

THE

MILITARY31%31%00%

GROUP

6 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

41%

31%

23%5%

28%27%31%

35%

7%

42%

GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 298

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS


NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

298

251

47

1

4

100

61

121

11

5

155

143

292

6

218

80

298

TOTAL TESTED

28%

33%

2%

_%

_%

21%

31%

32%

18%

60%

34%

22%

29%

0%

23%

41%

28%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

121 41%

83 33%

38 81%

_ _

_ _

51 51%

27 44%

39 32%

3 27%

1 20%

59 38%

62 43%

116 40%

5 83%

104 48%

17 21%

121 41%

LEVEL 2

93 31%

85 34%

8 17%

_ _

_ _

28 28%

15 25%

43 36%

6 55%

1 20%

44 28%

49 34%

92 32%

1 17%

63 29%

30 38%

93 31%

LEVEL 3

68 23%

67 27%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

19 19%

13 21%

33 27%

2 18%

1 20%

39 25%

29 20%

68 23%

0 0%

43 20%

25 31%

68 23%

LEVEL 4

16 5%

16 6%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

2 2%

6 10%

6 5%

0 0%

2 40%

13 8%

3 2%

16 5%

0 0%

8 4%

8 10%

16 5%

7 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

39% 36%

18%

7%

25%24%

35%

26%

15%

41%


MEAN SCORE: 293

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

278

235

43

2

88

63

108

17

19

133

145

274

4

218

60

278

TOTAL TESTED

25%

29%

0%

_%

18%

19%

33%

_%

26%

29%

21%

_%

_%

19%

45%

25%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

109 39%

69 29%

40 93%

_ _

43 49%

32 51%

29 27%

_ _

5 26%

48 36%

61 42%

_ _

_ _

102 47%

7 12%

109 39%

LEVEL 2

100 36%

97 41%

3 7%

_ _

29 33%

19 30%

43 40%

_ _

9 47%

47 35%

53 37%

_ _

_ _

74 34%

26 43%

100 36%

LEVEL 3

50 18%

50 21%

0 0%

_ _

16 18%

8 13%

23 21%

_ _

3 16%

25 19%

25 17%

_ _

_ _

30 14%

20 33%

50 18%

LEVEL 4

19 7%

19 8%

0 0%

_ _

0 0%

4 6%

13 12%

_ _

2 11%

13 10%

6 4%

_ _

_ _

12 6%

7 12%

19 7%

8 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

6059%

22%15% 4% 19%

36%30%

23%

10%

33%


MEAN SCORE: 278

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

264

211

53

1

5

91

38

117

12

6

120

144

262

2

190

74

264

TOTAL TESTED

19%

23%

2%

_%

_%

10%

13%

26%

25%

33%

28%

12%

_%

_%

13%

34%

19%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

155 59%

107 51%

48 91%

_ _

_ _

58 64%

23 61%

66 56%

6 50%

2 33%

56 47%

99 69%

_ _

_ _

124 65%

31 42%

155 59%

LEVEL 2

59 22%

55 26%

4 8%

_ _

_ _

24 26%

10 26%

20 17%

3 25%

2 33%

31 26%

28 19%

_ _

_ _

41 22%

18 24%

59 22%

LEVEL 3

40 15%

39 18%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

7 8%

4 11%

24 21%

3 25%

2 33%

25 21%

15 10%

_ _

_ _

22 12%

18 24%

40 15%

LEVEL 4

10 4%

10 5%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

2 2%

1 3%

7 6%

0 0%

0 0%

8 7%

2 1%

_ _

_ _

3 2%

7 9%

10 4%

9 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

60%

29% 7% 4%12%

27%38%

20%14%

34%


MEAN SCORE: 271

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

214

174

40

1

4

78

24

97

10

5

102

112

209

5

149

65

214

TOTAL TESTED

12%

14%

0%

_%

_%

3%

8%

20%

10%

20%

13%

11%

12%

0%

6%

25%

12%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

128 60%

92 53%

36 90%

_ _

_ _

54 69%

14 58%

50 52%

7 70%

3 60%

51 50%

77 69%

124 59%

4 80%

100 67%

28 43%

128 60%

LEVEL 2

61 29%

57 33%

4 10%

_ _

_ _

22 28%

8 33%

28 29%

2 20%

1 20%

38 37%

23 21%

60 29%

1 20%

40 27%

21 32%

61 29%

LEVEL 3

16 7%

16 9%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

2 8%

11 11%

1 10%

1 20%

7 7%

9 8%

16 8%

0 0%

6 4%

10 15%

16 7%

LEVEL 4

9 4%

9 5%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

0 0%

8 8%

0 0%

0 0%

6 6%

3 3%

9 4%

0 0%

3 2%

6 9%

9 4%

10 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

46%

31%

14%9%

23%28%

36%

24%

11%

35%


MEAN SCORE: 287

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

245

209

36

1

8

99

32

95

10

9

125

120

243

2

171

74

245

TOTAL TESTED

23%

27%

0%

_%

_%

13%

19%

35%

10%

33%

30%

15%

_%

_%

15%

42%

23%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

113 46%

83 40%

30 83%

_ _

_ _

56 57%

21 66%

27 28%

6 60%

3 33%

47 38%

66 55%

_ _

_ _

96 56%

17 23%

113 46%

LEVEL 2

76 31%

70 33%

6 17%

_ _

_ _

30 30%

5 16%

35 37%

3 30%

3 33%

40 32%

36 30%

_ _

_ _

50 29%

26 35%

76 31%

LEVEL 3

35 14%

35 17%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

11 11%

6 19%

18 19%

0 0%

0 0%

23 18%

12 10%

_ _

_ _

16 9%

19 26%

35 14%

LEVEL 4

21 9%

21 10%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

2 2%

0 0%

15 16%

1 10%

3 33%

15 12%

6 5%

_ _

_ _

9 5%

12 16%

21 9%

11 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

46%

30%

17% 6% 23%24%

35%27%

14%

41%


MEAN SCORE: 286

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

246

218

28

1

3

86

50

97

9

13

133

113

242

4

172

74

246

TOTAL TESTED

23%

26%

0%

_%

_%

10%

20%

33%

_%

46%

29%

16%

_%

_%

15%

43%

23%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

114 46%

86 39%

28 100%

_ _

_ _

51 59%

28 56%

30 31%

_ _

5 38%

46 35%

68 60%

_ _

_ _

93 54%

21 28%

114 46%

LEVEL 2

75 30%

75 34%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

26 30%

12 24%

35 36%

_ _

2 15%

48 36%

27 24%

_ _

_ _

54 31%

21 28%

75 30%

LEVEL 3

42 17%

42 19%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

9 10%

7 14%

23 24%

_ _

3 23%

28 21%

14 12%

_ _

_ _

20 12%

22 30%

42 17%

LEVEL 4

15 6%

15 7%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

3 6%

9 9%

_ _

3 23%

11 8%

4 4%

_ _

_ _

5 3%

10 14%

15 6%

12 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

46%

27%

16%10%

27%25%31%

22% 22%

44%

GRADE 3 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 287

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

298

251

47

1

6

100

62

118

11

7

154

144

290

8

217

81

298

TOTAL TESTED

27%

30%

6%

_%

_%

19%

24%

32%

18%

71%

28%

25%

27%

25%

20%

44%

27%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

138 46%

102 41%

36 77%

_ _

_ _

56 56%

33 53%

43 36%

5 45%

1 14%

69 45%

69 48%

133 46%

5 63%

113 52%

25 31%

138 46%

LEVEL 2

81 27%

73 29%

8 17%

_ _

_ _

25 25%

14 23%

37 31%

4 36%

1 14%

42 27%

39 27%

80 28%

1 13%

61 28%

20 25%

81 27%

LEVEL 3

49 16%

48 19%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

12 12%

7 11%

26 22%

1 9%

3 43%

23 15%

26 18%

48 17%

1 13%

29 13%

20 25%

49 16%

LEVEL 4

30 10%

28 11%

2 4%

_ _

_ _

7 7%

8 13%

12 10%

1 9%

2 29%

20 13%

10 7%

29 10%

1 13%

14 6%

16 20%

30 10%

13 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

47%

26%

15% 12%

27%28% 28%23% 21%

45%


MEAN SCORE: 286

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

273

230

43

3

87

63

103

17

20

129

144

268

5

214

59

273

TOTAL TESTED

27%

32%

2%

_%

16%

17%

40%

_%

40%

27%

27%

27%

20%

22%

46%

27%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

128 47%

91 40%

37 86%

_ _

49 56%

38 60%

34 33%

_ _

7 35%

64 50%

64 44%

124 46%

4 80%

115 54%

13 22%

128 47%

LEVEL 2

71 26%

66 29%

5 12%

_ _

24 28%

14 22%

28 27%

_ _

5 25%

30 23%

41 28%

71 26%

0 0%

52 24%

19 32%

71 26%

LEVEL 3

42 15%

41 18%

1 2%

_ _

13 15%

7 11%

19 18%

_ _

3 15%

20 16%

22 15%

42 16%

0 0%

29 14%

13 22%

42 15%

LEVEL 4

32 12%

32 14%

0 0%

_ _

1 1%

4 6%

22 21%

_ _

5 25%

15 12%

17 12%

31 12%

1 20%

18 8%

14 24%

32 12%

14 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

6055%

25%

15% 5% 20%

32%28%

24%16%

40%


MEAN SCORE: 284

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

260

207

53

1

5

89

38

115

12

6

118

142

255

5

185

75

260

TOTAL TESTED

20%

24%

2%

_%

_%

10%

24%

25%

17%

33%

24%

16%

20%

0%

15%

31%

20%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

144 55%

102 49%

42 79%

_ _

_ _

60 67%

19 50%

57 50%

6 50%

2 33%

58 49%

86 61%

140 55%

4 80%

112 61%

32 43%

144 55%

LEVEL 2

65 25%

55 27%

10 19%

_ _

_ _

20 22%

10 26%

29 25%

4 33%

2 33%

32 27%

33 23%

64 25%

1 20%

45 24%

20 27%

65 25%

LEVEL 3

39 15%

38 18%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

8 9%

9 24%

20 17%

2 17%

0 0%

22 19%

17 12%

39 15%

0 0%

24 13%

15 20%

39 15%

LEVEL 4

12 5%

12 6%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

0 0%

9 8%

0 0%

2 33%

6 5%

6 4%

12 5%

0 0%

4 2%

8 11%

12 5%

15 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

6053%

33%

9%4% 14%

26%34%

18%22%

40%


MEAN SCORE: 275

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

204

166

38

1

4

76

22

91

10

5

98

106

198

6

140

64

204

TOTAL TESTED

14%

17%

0%

_%

_%

3%

9%

24%

20%

0%

12%

15%

14%

0%

9%

23%

14%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

108 53%

78 47%

30 79%

_ _

_ _

55 72%

11 50%

34 37%

5 50%

3 60%

49 50%

59 56%

104 53%

4 67%

85 61%

23 36%

108 53%

LEVEL 2

68 33%

60 36%

8 21%

_ _

_ _

19 25%

9 41%

35 38%

3 30%

2 40%

37 38%

31 29%

66 33%

2 33%

42 30%

26 41%

68 33%

LEVEL 3

19 9%

19 11%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

1 5%

15 16%

2 20%

0 0%

11 11%

8 8%

19 10%

0 0%

9 6%

10 16%

19 9%

LEVEL 4

9 4%

9 5%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

1 5%

7 8%

0 0%

0 0%

1 1%

8 8%

9 5%

0 0%

4 3%

5 8%

9 4%

16 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0

20

40

60

80

63%

24% 10%3%

14%

34% 30%22%

14%

36%


Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.

For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu

of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 278

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

232

204

28

1

8

94

31

88

10

9

119

113

228

4

159

73

232

TOTAL TESTED

14%

16%

0%

_%

_%

4%

3%

25%

10%

44%

17%

11%

_%

_%

5%

33%

14%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

145 63%

119 58%

26 93%

_ _

_ _

68 72%

23 74%

43 49%

7 70%

4 44%

71 60%

74 65%

_ _

_ _

114 72%

31 42%

145 63%

LEVEL 2

55 24%

53 26%

2 7%

_ _

_ _

22 23%

7 23%

23 26%

2 20%

1 11%

28 24%

27 24%

_ _

_ _

37 23%

18 25%

55 24%

LEVEL 3

24 10%

24 12%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

4 4%

1 3%

18 20%

1 10%

0 0%

15 13%

9 8%

_ _

_ _

5 3%

19 26%

24 10%

LEVEL 4

8 3%

8 4%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

4 5%

0 0%

4 44%

5 4%

3 3%

_ _

_ _

3 2%

5 7%

8 3%

17 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

29% 27%

17%

27%

44%


Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.

For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu

of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 273

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

229

201

28

1

3

81

40

95

9

13

123

106

224

5

158

71

229

TOTAL TESTED

12%

13%

0%

_%

_%

2%

8%

19%

_%

31%

11%

13%

12%

0%

5%

27%

12%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

135 59%

108 54%

27 96%

_ _

_ _

68 84%

21 53%

39 41%

_ _

7 54%

71 58%

64 60%

130 58%

5 100%

110 70%

25 35%

135 59%

LEVEL 2

67 29%

66 33%

1 4%

_ _

_ _

11 14%

16 40%

38 40%

_ _

2 15%

39 32%

28 26%

67 30%

0 0%

40 25%

27 38%

67 29%

LEVEL 3

21 9%

21 10%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

2 2%

2 5%

15 16%

_ _

2 15%

10 8%

11 10%

21 9%

0 0%

8 5%

13 18%

21 9%

LEVEL 4

6 3%

6 3%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

1 3%

3 3%

_ _

2 15%

3 2%

3 3%

6 3%

0 0%

0 0%

6 8%

6 3%

GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS MATH TEST

Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.

ALL STUDENTS

GROUP

1

TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1

_ _

LEVEL 2

_ _

LEVEL 3

_ _

4 & ABOVE

_ _

3 & ABOVE

_ _

18 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

6%16%

45%33%

78%

3% 8% 36%

52%

89%

GRADE 4 SCIENCEDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 75

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

281

237

44

3

88

62

111

17

20

131

150

276

5

216

65

281

TOTAL TESTED

78%

83%

52%

_%

69%

73%

87%

_%

80%

83%

73%

78%

60%

74%

91%

78%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

17 6%

7 3%

10 23%

_ _

8 9%

5 8%

4 4%

_ _

0 0%

5 4%

12 8%

16 6%

1 20%

16 7%

1 2%

17 6%

LEVEL 2

45 16%

34 14%

11 25%

_ _

19 22%

12 19%

10 9%

_ _

4 20%

17 13%

28 19%

44 16%

1 20%

40 19%

5 8%

45 16%

LEVEL 3

127 45%

109 46%

18 41%

_ _

43 49%

29 47%

47 42%

_ _

8 40%

66 50%

61 41%

125 45%

2 40%

98 45%

29 45%

127 45%

LEVEL 4

92 33%

87 37%

5 11%

_ _

18 20%

16 26%

50 45%

_ _

8 40%

43 33%

49 33%

91 33%

1 20%

62 29%

30 46%

92 33%

19 of 48

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

27% 31% 34%8%

42%

10%21%

40%29%

69%

GRADE 8 SCIENCEDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test.

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

MEAN SCORE: 57

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

244

218

26

1

3

79

51

102

8

12

134

110

236

8

165

79

244

TOTAL TESTED

42%

46%

4%

_%

_%

24%

33%

60%

_%

42%

44%

39%

43%

0%

32%

63%

42%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

67 27%

48 22%

19 73%

_ _

_ _

33 42%

18 35%

13 13%

_ _

3 25%

39 29%

28 25%

62 26%

5 63%

59 36%

8 10%

67 27%

LEVEL 2

75 31%

69 32%

6 23%

_ _

_ _

27 34%

16 31%

28 27%

_ _

4 33%

36 27%

39 35%

72 31%

3 38%

54 33%

21 27%

75 31%

LEVEL 3

82 34%

81 37%

1 4%

_ _

_ _

19 24%

17 33%

43 42%

_ _

3 25%

47 35%

35 32%

82 35%

0 0%

45 27%

37 47%

82 34%

LEVEL 4

20 8%

20 9%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

18 18%

_ _

2 17%

12 9%

8 7%

20 8%

0 0%

7 4%

13 16%

20 8%

20 of 48

RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS (2015 - 16)GRADE

GRADE 3

GRADE 4

GRADE 5

GRADE 6

GRADE 7

GRADE 8

RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP

2

1

3

1

4

4

GRADE

GRADE 3

GRADE 4

GRADE 5

GRADE 6

GRADE 7

GRADE 8

RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP

2

1

3

1

4

4

21 of 48

READING

MATHEMATICS

READING

MATHEMATICS

STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2014 - 15)

GRADE: 4

ALL STUDENTS

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…

HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL


ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER…

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…

GROUP

32%

*%

20%

48%

44%

20%

*%

70%

74%

43%

BELOW BASIC

32%

*%

30%

34%

37%

31%

*%

22%

21%

36%

BASIC

27%

*%

33%

15%

17%

37%

*%

7%

4%

18%

PROFICIENT

9%

*%

17%

3%

2%

12%

*%

1%

1%

3%

ADVANCED

98

88

PARTICIPATION RATE

ALL STUDENTS




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

21%

*%

12%

40%

28%

12%

*%

49%

56%

29%

BELOW BASIC

44%

*%

31%

46%

51%

41%

*%

39%

35%

48%

BASIC

30%

*%

42%

13%

20%

40%

*%

10%

9%

21%

PROFICIENT

5%

*%

15%

1%

1%

7%

*%

2%

*%

2%

ADVANCED

98

91

PARTICIPATION RATE

GRADE: 8

ALL STUDENTS




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

27%

*%

19%

42%

35%

18%

*%

59%

78%

36%

BELOW BASIC

40%

*%

39%

41%

43%

39%

*%

33%

19%

42%

BASIC

29%

*%

34%

16%

20%

38%

*%

8%

3%

21%

PROFICIENT

4%

*%

8%

1%

2%

5%

*%

*%

*%

1%

ADVANCED

98

89

PARTICIPATION RATE

ALL STUDENTS


GROUP

31%

*%

BELOW BASIC

38%

*%

BASIC

24%

*%

PROFICIENT

7%

*%

ADVANCED PARTICIPATION RATE

22 of 48



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




18%

48%

41%

20%

*%

64%

72%

40%

30%

37%

40%

40%

*%

27%

21%

39%

33%

13%

16%

31%

*%

8%

6%

17%

19%

2%

3%

9%

*%

1%

1%

4%

99

94

23 of 48

District:2012Cohort

Statewide:2012Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

1% 2%

46%39%

84%

3% 3%37%

47%

85%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGEARTS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

295

248

47

2

3

97

36

145

12

5

158

137

294

1

187

108

295

TOTAL TESTED

84%

90%

53%

_%

_%

89%

92%

82%

58%

80%

84%

85%

_%

_%

80%

93%

84%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

3 1%

1 0%

2 4%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

3 2%

0 0%

0 0%

1 1%

2 1%

_ _

_ _

3 2%

0 0%

3 1%

LEVEL 2

7 2%

4 2%

3 6%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

0 0%

6 4%

0 0%

0 0%

4 3%

3 2%

_ _

_ _

5 3%

2 2%

7 2%

LEVEL 3

135 46%

111 45%

24 51%

_ _

_ _

53 55%

20 56%

54 37%

6 50%

2 40%

71 45%

64 47%

_ _

_ _

89 48%

46 43%

135 46%

LEVEL 4

114 39%

113 46%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

33 34%

13 36%

65 45%

1 8%

2 40%

62 39%

52 38%

_ _

_ _

60 32%

54 50%

114 39%

24 of 48

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

2% 2%

73%

13%

86%

3% 5%

59%

27%

86%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS AFTERFOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

295

248

47

2

3

97

36

145

12

5

158

137

294

1

187

108

295

TOTAL TESTED

86%

92%

55%

_%

_%

89%

86%

87%

58%

80%

84%

88%

_%

_%

82%

94%

86%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

5 2%

1 0%

4 9%

_ _

_ _

3 3%

0 0%

2 1%

0 0%

0 0%

3 2%

2 1%

_ _

_ _

5 3%

0 0%

5 2%

LEVEL 2

7 2%

4 2%

3 6%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

2 6%

1 1%

2 17%

1 20%

5 3%

2 1%

_ _

_ _

6 3%

1 1%

7 2%

LEVEL 3

215 73%

192 77%

23 49%

_ _

_ _

79 81%

28 78%

98 68%

7 58%

3 60%

112 71%

103 75%

_ _

_ _

139 74%

76 70%

215 73%

LEVEL 4

39 13%

36 15%

3 6%

_ _

_ _

7 7%

3 8%

28 19%

0 0%

1 20%

21 13%

18 13%

_ _

_ _

14 7%

25 23%

39 13%

25 of 48

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

3% 3%

56%

27%

82%

6% 6%

44%34%

78%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL GLOBAL HISTORY ANDGEOGRAPHY AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

295

248

47

2

3

97

36

145

12

5

158

137

294

1

187

108

295

TOTAL TESTED

82%

88%

53%

_%

_%

87%

89%

81%

50%

60%

80%

85%

_%

_%

78%

91%

82%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

9 3%

4 2%

5 11%

_ _

_ _

3 3%

0 0%

4 3%

2 17%

0 0%

7 4%

2 1%

_ _

_ _

9 5%

0 0%

9 3%

LEVEL 2

9 3%

7 3%

2 4%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

0 0%

6 4%

1 8%

1 20%

5 3%

4 3%

_ _

_ _

7 4%

2 2%

9 3%

LEVEL 3

164 56%

142 57%

22 47%

_ _

_ _

64 66%

24 67%

70 48%

5 42%

1 20%

84 53%

80 58%

_ _

_ _

108 58%

56 52%

164 56%

LEVEL 4

79 27%

76 31%

3 6%

_ _

_ _

20 21%

8 22%

48 33%

1 8%

2 40%

43 27%

36 26%

_ _

_ _

37 20%

42 39%

79 27%

26 of 48

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

2% 1%

45% 39%

84%

3% 4%33%

48%

81%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL U.S. HISTORY ANDGOVERNMENT AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

295

248

47

2

3

97

36

145

12

5

158

137

294

1

187

108

295

TOTAL TESTED

84%

90%

51%

_%

_%

87%

89%

84%

42%

80%

83%

85%

_%

_%

79%

93%

84%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

5 2%

3 1%

2 4%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

1 3%

1 1%

2 17%

0 0%

3 2%

2 1%

_ _

_ _

5 3%

0 0%

5 2%

LEVEL 2

3 1%

1 0%

2 4%

_ _

_ _

2 2%

0 0%

1 1%

0 0%

0 0%

2 1%

1 1%

_ _

_ _

2 1%

1 1%

3 1%

LEVEL 3

133 45%

113 46%

20 43%

_ _

_ _

46 47%

21 58%

60 41%

4 33%

2 40%

78 49%

55 40%

_ _

_ _

85 45%

48 44%

133 45%

LEVEL 4

114 39%

110 44%

4 9%

_ _

_ _

38 39%

11 31%

62 43%

1 8%

2 40%

53 34%

61 45%

_ _

_ _

62 33%

52 48%

114 39%

27 of 48

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4% 4%

64%

19%

83%

3% 5%

45%38%

84%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE AFTER FOURYEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

295

248

47

2

3

97

36

145

12

5

158

137

294

1

187

108

295

TOTAL TESTED

83%

90%

49%

_%

_%

86%

83%

84%

50%

80%

82%

85%

_%

_%

79%

91%

83%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

13 4%

8 3%

5 11%

_ _

_ _

4 4%

2 6%

4 3%

2 17%

1 20%

7 4%

6 4%

_ _

_ _

12 6%

1 1%

13 4%

LEVEL 2

12 4%

7 3%

5 11%

_ _

_ _

3 3%

1 3%

7 5%

1 8%

0 0%

5 3%

7 5%

_ _

_ _

10 5%

2 2%

12 4%

LEVEL 3

188 64%

166 67%

22 47%

_ _

_ _

70 72%

25 69%

83 57%

6 50%

4 80%

98 62%

90 66%

_ _

_ _

121 65%

67 62%

188 64%

LEVEL 4

57 19%

56 23%

1 2%

_ _

_ _

13 13%

5 14%

39 27%

0 0%

0 0%

31 20%

26 19%

_ _

_ _

26 14%

31 29%

57 19%

28 of 48

REGENTS COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)

Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)

COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

44

38

6

1

1

18

8

16

10

19

25

41

3

31

13

44

TOTAL TESTED 55

37 84%

33 87%

4 67%

_ _

_ _

16 89%

_ _

13 81%

8 80%

15 79%

22 88%

_ _

_ _

29 94%

8 62%

37 84%

65

33 75%

29 76%

4 67%

_ _

_ _

15 83%

_ _

10 63%

8 80%

13 68%

20 80%

_ _

_ _

26 84%

7 54%

33 75%

85

1 2%

1 3%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

1 6%

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

1 4%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

1 8%

1 2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

324

288

36

1

7

95

51

160

10

8

153

171

308

16

179

145

324


22 7%

16 6%

6 17%

_ _

_ _

8 8%

3 6%

11 7%

0 0%

0 0%

6 4%

16 9%

19 6%

3 19%

17 9%

5 3%

22 7%

LEVEL 2

25 8%

17 6%

8 22%

_ _

_ _

7 7%

9 18%

8 5%

1 10%

0 0%

10 7%

15 9%

21 7%

4 25%

20 11%

5 3%

25 8%

LEVEL 3

84 26%

71 25%

13 36%

_ _

_ _

28 29%

20 39%

31 19%

2 20%

3 38%

36 24%

48 28%

78 25%

6 38%

54 30%

30 21%

84 26%

LEVEL 4

57 18%

49 17%

8 22%

_ _

_ _

22 23%

8 16%

25 16%

0 0%

2 25%

26 17%

31 18%

55 18%

2 13%

30 17%

27 19%

57 18%

LEVEL 5

136 42%

135 47%

1 3%

_ _

_ _

30 32%

11 22%

85 53%

7 70%

3 38%

75 49%

61 36%

135 44%

1 6%

58 32%

78 54%

136 42%

29 of 48

REGENTS INTEGRATED ALGEBRA

REGENTS GEOMETRY

INTEGRATED ALGEBRA

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

27

20

7

1

2

11

4

8

1

8

13

14

22

5

15

12

27

TOTAL TESTED 55

26 96%

20 100%

6 86%

_ _

_ _

11 100%

_ _

7 88%

_ _

8 100%

12 92%

14 100%

21 95%

5 100%

14 93%

12 100%

26 96%

65

24 89%

20 100%

4 57%

_ _

_ _

9 82%

_ _

7 88%

_ _

8 100%

12 92%

12 86%

19 86%

5 100%

12 80%

12 100%

24 89%

85

2 7%

2 10%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

_ _

0 0%

_ _

2 25%

1 8%

1 7%

0 0%

2 40%

0 0%

2 17%

2 7%

GEOMETRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

41

41

4

5

6

22

4

8

23

18

40

1

20

21

41

TOTAL TESTED 55

30 73%

30 73%

_ _

4 80%

4 67%

16 73%

_ _

6 75%

17 74%

13 72%

_ _

_ _

15 75%

15 71%

30 73%

65

16 39%

16 39%

_ _

1 20%

4 67%

7 32%

_ _

4 50%

10 43%

6 33%

_ _

_ _

7 35%

9 43%

16 39%

85

1 2%

1 2%

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

1 13%

1 4%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

1 5%

1 2%

30 of 48

REGENTS ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY

ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)

ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

129

129

5

25

11

82

6

72

57

129

49

80

129

TOTAL TESTED 55

110 85%

110 85%

4 80%

18 72%

6 55%

76 93%

6 100%

61 85%

49 86%

110 85%

38 78%

72 90%

110 85%

65

97 75%

97 75%

4 80%

15 60%

5 45%

67 82%

6 100%

56 78%

41 72%

97 75%

34 69%

63 79%

97 75%

85

34 26%

34 26%

3 60%

2 8%

0 0%

27 33%

2 33%

24 33%

10 18%

34 26%

10 20%

24 30%

34 26%

ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

366

308

58

2

11

139

48

156

10

12

187

179

353

13

246

120

366


47 13%

26 8%

21 36%

_ _

1 9%

23 17%

6 13%

17 11%

_ _

0 0%

23 12%

24 13%

44 12%

3 23%

41 17%

6 5%

47 13%

LEVEL 2

56 15%

44 14%

12 21%

_ _

1 9%

27 19%

12 25%

14 9%

_ _

2 17%

28 15%

28 16%

51 14%

5 38%

44 18%

12 10%

56 15%

LEVEL 3

192 52%

171 56%

21 36%

_ _

4 36%

76 55%

26 54%

79 51%

_ _

7 58%

102 55%

90 50%

187 53%

5 38%

132 54%

60 50%

192 52%

LEVEL 4

56 15%

53 17%

3 5%

_ _

3 27%

13 9%

2 4%

36 23%

_ _

2 17%

26 14%

30 17%

56 16%

0 0%

28 11%

28 23%

56 15%

LEVEL 5

15 4%

14 5%

1 2%

_ _

2 18%

0 0%

2 4%

10 6%

_ _

1 8%

8 4%

7 4%

15 4%

0 0%

1 0%

14 12%

15 4%

31 of 48

GEOMETRY (COMMON CORE)

ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)

GEOMETRY (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

198

192

6

6

50

26

106

10

106

92

197

1

98

100

198


47 24%

43 22%

4 67%

2 33%

21 42%

8 31%

13 12%

3 30%

26 25%

21 23%

_ _

_ _

29 30%

18 18%

47 24%

LEVEL 2

44 22%

43 22%

1 17%

0 0%

13 26%

5 19%

23 22%

3 30%

24 23%

20 22%

_ _

_ _

23 23%

21 21%

44 22%

LEVEL 3

90 45%

89 46%

1 17%

3 50%

16 32%

13 50%

54 51%

4 40%

47 44%

43 47%

_ _

_ _

45 46%

45 45%

90 45%

LEVEL 4

7 4%

7 4%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

7 7%

0 0%

5 5%

2 2%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

7 7%

7 4%

LEVEL 5

10 5%

10 5%

0 0%

1 17%

0 0%

0 0%

9 8%

0 0%

4 4%

6 7%

_ _

_ _

1 1%

9 9%

10 5%

ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

80

80

4

6

4

63

3

11

43

37

80

21

59

80


17 21%

17 21%

_ _

1 17%

_ _

14 22%

_ _

2 18%

11 26%

6 16%

17 21%

3 14%

14 24%

17 21%

LEVEL 2

24 30%

24 30%

_ _

2 33%

_ _

18 29%

_ _

4 36%

10 23%

14 38%

24 30%

6 29%

18 31%

24 30%

LEVEL 3

35 44%

35 44%

_ _

3 50%

_ _

28 44%

_ _

4 36%

21 49%

14 38%

35 44%

9 43%

26 44%

35 44%

LEVEL 4

4 5%

4 5%

_ _

0 0%

_ _

3 5%

_ _

1 9%

1 2%

3 8%

4 5%

3 14%

1 2%

4 5%

LEVEL 5

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

0 0%

_ _

0 0%

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

32 of 48

REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

REGENTS U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT

GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

452

369

83

1

7

171

62

192

19

8

217

235

439

13

299

153

452

TOTAL TESTED 55

368 81%

322 87%

46 55%

_ _

_ _

133 78%

49 79%

163 85%

17 89%

6 75%

174 80%

194 83%

357 81%

11 85%

227 76%

141 92%

368 81%

65

322 71%

289 78%

33 40%

_ _

_ _

115 67%

41 66%

146 76%

14 74%

6 75%

152 70%

170 72%

315 72%

7 54%

193 65%

129 84%

322 71%

85

91 20%

87 24%

4 5%

_ _

_ _

13 8%

8 13%

63 33%

3 16%

4 50%

38 18%

53 23%

91 21%

0 0%

35 12%

56 37%

91 20%

U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

329

290

39

1

7

100

49

160

12

8

156

173

313

16

182

147

329

TOTAL TESTED 55

303 92%

272 94%

31 79%

_ _

_ _

91 91%

42 86%

151 94%

11 92%

8 100%

146 94%

157 91%

292 93%

11 69%

163 90%

140 95%

303 92%

65

287 87%

261 90%

26 67%

_ _

_ _

86 86%

37 76%

145 91%

11 92%

8 100%

137 88%

150 87%

279 89%

8 50%

154 85%

133 90%

287 87%

85

151 46%

144 50%

7 18%

_ _

_ _

31 31%

12 24%

96 60%

8 67%

4 50%

69 44%

82 47%

151 48%

0 0%

62 34%

89 61%

151 46%

33 of 48

REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE

LIVING ENVIRONMENT

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE





NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

422

348

74

2

10

160

55

178

17

12

214

208

403

19

285

137

422

TOTAL TESTED 55

346 82%

294 84%

52 70%

_ _

_ _

123 77%

42 76%

157 88%

14 82%

10 83%

178 83%

168 81%

333 83%

13 68%

216 76%

130 95%

346 82%

65

276 65%

244 70%

32 43%

_ _

_ _

89 56%

30 55%

137 77%

12 71%

8 67%

139 65%

137 66%

271 67%

5 26%

163 57%

113 82%

276 65%

85

49 12%

48 14%

1 1%

_ _

_ _

5 3%

2 4%

41 23%

0 0%

1 8%

26 12%

23 11%

49 12%

0 0%

16 6%

33 24%

49 12%

PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

180

173

7

4

58

19

90

9

13

100

80

180

105

75

180

TOTAL TESTED 55

119 66%

115 66%

4 57%

_ _

25 43%

11 58%

71 79%

_ _

12 92%

61 61%

58 73%

119 66%

55 52%

64 85%

119 66%

65

96 53%

94 54%

2 29%

_ _

16 28%

8 42%

62 69%

_ _

10 77%

48 48%

48 60%

96 53%

38 36%

58 77%

96 53%

85

26 14%

26 15%

0 0%

_ _

0 0%

2 11%

20 22%

_ _

4 31%

15 15%

11 14%

26 14%

9 9%

17 23%

26 14%

34 of 48

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

177

175

2

5

39

13

114

6

85

92

177

71

106

177

TOTAL TESTED 55

154 87%

_ _

_ _

5 100%

30 77%

12 92%

103 90%

4 67%

75 88%

79 86%

154 87%

58 82%

96 91%

154 87%

65

121 68%

_ _

_ _

3 60%

20 51%

9 69%

85 75%

4 67%

58 68%

63 68%

121 68%

46 65%

75 71%

121 68%

85

25 14%

_ _

_ _

1 20%

1 3%

0 0%

22 19%

1 17%

6 7%

19 21%

25 14%

5 7%

20 19%

25 14%

PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

47

47

3

12

4

27

1

8

14

33

47

18

29

47

TOTAL TESTED 55

25 53%

25 53%

_ _

5 42%

_ _

19 70%

_ _

1 13%

8 57%

17 52%

25 53%

8 44%

17 59%

25 53%

65

18 38%

18 38%

_ _

3 25%

_ _

15 56%

_ _

0 0%

3 21%

15 45%

18 38%

5 28%

13 45%

18 38%

85

5 11%

5 11%

_ _

0 0%

_ _

5 19%

_ _

0 0%

1 7%

4 12%

5 11%

1 6%

4 14%

5 11%

35 of 48

NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (NYSAA) RESULTS (2015 - 16)

GRADE 3 ELA

GRADE 3 MATH

GRADE 4 ELA

GRADE 4 MATH

GRADE 4 SCIENCE

GRADE 5 ELA

GRADE 5 MATH

GRADE 6 ELA

GRADE 6 MATH

GRADE 7 ELA

GRADE 7 MATH

GRADE 8 ELA

GRADE 8 MATH

GRADE 8 SCIENCE

SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH

SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE

SECONDARY-LEVEL SOCIAL STUDIES

GROUP

10

10

7

7

8

6

6

9

9

8

8

9

9

9

10

10

9

9

TOTAL TESTED

80%

70%

100%

100%

88%

83%

83%

100%

67%

63%

63%

89%

89%

89%

100%

100%

78%

100%

PROFICIENT

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

LEVEL 1

2

3

0

0

1

1

1

0

3

2

3

1

0

1

0

0

2

0

LEVEL 2

8

7

6

7

4

5

5

9

6

4

4

5

5

7

7

6

5

9

LEVEL 3

0

0

1

0

3

0

0

0

0

1

1

3

3

1

3

4

2

0

LEVEL 4

36 of 48

NEW YORK STATE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NYSESLAT) RESULTS (2015 - 16)

KINDERGARTEN

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

10

10

TOTAL TESTED

0%

0%

ENTERING

20%

20%

EMERGING

10%

10%

TRANSITIONING

60%

60%

EXPANDING

10%

10%

COMMANDING

GRADE 1

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

11

7

4

TOTAL TESTED

9%

_

_

ENTERING

18%

_

_

EMERGING

18%

_

_

TRANSITIONING

45%

_

_

EXPANDING

9%

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 2

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

16

12

4

TOTAL TESTED

6%

_

_

ENTERING

38%

_

_

EMERGING

25%

_

_

TRANSITIONING

31%

_

_

EXPANDING

0%

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 3

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

8

8

TOTAL TESTED

0%

0%

ENTERING

0%

0%

EMERGING

50%

50%

TRANSITIONING

50%

50%

EXPANDING

0%

0%

COMMANDING

GRADE 4

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

5

4

1

TOTAL TESTED

0%

_

_

ENTERING

0%

_

_

EMERGING

40%

_

_

TRANSITIONING

40%

_

_

EXPANDING

20%

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 5

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

5

5

TOTAL TESTED

20%

20%

ENTERING

20%

20%

EMERGING

20%

20%

TRANSITIONING

20%

20%

EXPANDING

20%

20%

COMMANDING

GRADE 6

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

6

5

1

TOTAL TESTED

0%

_

_

ENTERING

33%

_

_

EMERGING

33%

_

_

TRANSITIONING

17%

_

_

EXPANDING

17%

_

_

COMMANDING

37 of 48

GRADE 7

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

7

5

2

TOTAL TESTED

14%

_

_

ENTERING

57%

_

_

EMERGING

0%

_

_

TRANSITIONING

29%

_

_

EXPANDING

0%

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 8

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

8

7

1

TOTAL TESTED

25%

_

_

ENTERING

38%

_

_

EMERGING

0%

_

_

TRANSITIONING

38%

_

_

EXPANDING

0%

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 9

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

6

6

TOTAL TESTED

0%

0%

ENTERING

50%

50%

EMERGING

17%

17%

TRANSITIONING

33%

33%

EXPANDING

0%

0%

COMMANDING

GRADE 10

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

6

4

2

TOTAL TESTED

0%

_

_

ENTERING

17%

_

_

EMERGING

33%

_

_

TRANSITIONING

33%

_

_

EXPANDING

17%

_

_

COMMANDING

GRADE 11

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

12

12

TOTAL TESTED

0%

0%

ENTERING

17%

17%

EMERGING

33%

33%

TRANSITIONING

42%

42%

EXPANDING

8%

8%

COMMANDING

GRADE 12

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


GROUP

2

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

_

_

_

ENTERING

_

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

_

COMMANDING

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NOGROUP MADE AYP TESTED 95% STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

PI EAMO SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

38 of 48

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL


LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT


NO

―

NO

NO

―

NO

NO

NO

―

NO

NO

―

NO

NO

―

NO

YES

NO

―

NO

3,532*

5

1,162*

592*

30

1,553*

152*

636*

39

2,599*

90%*

―

93%*

93%*

―

87%*

96%*

90%*

―

91%*

YES

―

YES

YES

―

YES

NO

NO

―

YES

1,479

4

492

252

26

640

65

301✝

22

1,096

77

―

58

67

―

94

71

33✝

―

63

101

―

83

85

―

115

92

67

―

90

72

―

55

59

―

86

85

44

―

62

RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.

NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO

NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…

NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

3,523*

2,370*

2,940*

3,468*

1,979*

3,380*

2,896*

3,456*

933*

1,803*

1,729*

0

3,532*

STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION PERIOD

90%*

89%*

90%*

90%*

93%*

90%*

91%*

90%*

89%*

91%*

90%*

―

90%*

PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

1,475

987

1,227

1,453

839

1,414

1,204

1,457

383

758

721

0

1,479

TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY

77

86

79

76

64

77

87

78

115

65

90

―

77

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

39 of 48

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

NO

NO

―

NO

NO

NO

―

NO

MADE AYP

NO

―

NO

NO

―

NO

YES

NO

―

NO

TESTED 95%

3,533*

5

1,164*

592*

30

1,551*

153*

638*

39

2,599*

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

86%*

―

90%*

87%*

―

82%*

95%*

85%*

―

86%*

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

NO

―

NO

NO

―

NO

NO

NO

―

NO

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

1,433

4

482

242

29

612

64

289✝

25

1,058

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

71

―

46

62

―

92

72

40✝

―

57

PI

98

―

78

84

―

111

85

68

―

88

EAMO

78

―

56

66

―

95

85

52

―

67

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

3,524*

2,369*

2,941*

3,469*

1,982*

3,380*

2,895*

3,458*

934*

1,805*

1,728*

0

3,533*



86%*

84%*

86%*

86%*

89%*

86%*

86%*

86%*

85%*

87%*

85%*

―

86%*


VALID TEST SCORES

1,429

951

1,191

1,404

821

1,369

1,168

1,408

375

736

697

0

1,433


71

84

73

70

56

71

79

72

111

70

73

―

71

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

40 of 48

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

NO

YES

―

YES

―

NO

―

YES

MADE AYP

YES

―

YES

YES

―

YES

―

YES

―

YES

TESTED 80%

596

1

195

119

6

246

29

99

13

436

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

91%

―

89%

96%

―

90%

―

88%

―

90%

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

YES

―

NO

YES

―

YES

―

NO

―

YES

PI >= EAMO OR

PROGRESS TARGET

493

0

150

103

6

209

25

84✝

11

366

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

148

―

127

136

―

167

―

113✝

―

140

PI

182

―

167

168

―

186

―

160

―

174

EAMO

148

―

128

133

―

164

―

119

―

138

PROGRESS TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

595

401

477

590

350

567

497

583

160

301

295

0

596



91%

92%

90%

91%

92%

91%

92%

91%

93%

91%

91%

―

91%


VALID TEST SCORES

493

343

390

487

284

468

414

482

127

249

244

0

493


148

157

152

148

134

148

155

150

171

146

151

―

148

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

41 of 48

SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

YES

YES

―

NO

―

NO

―

YES

MADE AYP

YES

―

YES

YES

―

YES

―

NO

―

YES

TESTED 95%

310

1

108

43

4

144

10

84*

6

189

12TH GRADERS

97%

―

97%

98%

―

99%

―

94%*

―

96%

PERCENT OF 12TH

GRADERS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

YES

―

YES

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

YES

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

246

1

80

28

3

126

8

37✝

1

154

2012

ACCOUNTABILITY

COHORT MEMBERS

155

―

161

―

―

156

―

92✝

―

150

PI

167

―

147

―

―

174

―

118

―

154

EAMO

151

―

139

―

―

163

―

110

―

142

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

309

202

267

306

166

300

264

304

121

152

158

0

310

12TH GRADERS

97%

98%

97%

97%

96%

98%

99%

98%

99%

98%

97%

―

97%

PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID

TEST SCORES

245

166

218

243

120

238

210

245

92

121

125

0

246

2012 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS

156

152

156

155

155

157

166

156

164

151

159

―

155

PI

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.* The percentage of 12th graders tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of 12th graders in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with anotheropportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

42 of 48

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

YES

YES

―

NO

―

YES

―

YES

MADE AYP

YES

―

YES

YES

―

YES

―

YES

―

YES

TESTED 95%

310

1

108

43

4

144

10

84*

6

189

12TH GRADERS

98%

―

99%

98%

―

98%

―

96%*

―

97%

PERCENT OF 12TH

GRADERS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

YES

―

YES

―

―

NO

―

YES

―

YES

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

246

1

80

28

3

126

8

37✝

1

154

2012

ACCOUNTABILITY

COHORT MEMBERS

130

―

130

―

―

136

―

92✝

―

121

PI

152

―

127

―

―

161

―

109

―

138

EAMO

130

―

123

―

―

139

―

91

―

117

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

309

202

267

306

166

300

264

304

121

152

158

0

310

12TH GRADERS

98%

98%

98%

98%

98%

98%

99%

98%

99%

98%

98%

―

98%

PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID

TEST SCORES

245

166

218

243

120

238

210

245

92

121

125

0

246

2012 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS

130

130

132

130

123

131

136

130

143

131

128

―

130

PI

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.* The percentage of 12th graders tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of 12th graders in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with anotheropportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

43 of 48

― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

77

―

58

67

―

94

71

33

―

63

ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI

71

―

46

62

―

92

72

40

―

57

ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI

155

―

161

―

―

156

―

92

―

150

SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI

130

―

130

―

―

136

―

92

―

121

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI

108

0

99

65

0

120

72

64

0

98

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI

OVERALL GRADUATION RATE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

YES

YES

―

YES

―

YES

―

YES

MADE AYP

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

44 of 48

FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

NO

YES

―

YES

―

NO

―

NO

MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:

298

1

102

42

1

144

8

56✝

5

182

2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL

COHORT

77%

―

75%

67%

―

80%

―

57%✝

―

73%

GRADUATION RATE

80%

―

80%

80%

―

80%

―

80%

―

80%

STATE STANDARD

80%

―

80%

67%

―

80%

―

70%

―

77%

PROGRESS TARGET

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

45 of 48

FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

YES

YES

―

YES

―

YES

―

YES

MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:

336

0

112

32

6

182

4

62✝

7

196

2010 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL

COHORT

84%

―

82%

75%

―

86%

―

73%✝

―

79%

GRADUATION RATE

80%

―

80%

80%

―

80%

―

80%

―

80%

STATE STANDARD

79%

―

73%

74%

―

80%

―

67%

―

79%

PROGRESS TARGET

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

46 of 48

GRADUATION RATES FOR NON-AYP GROUPS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY





NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT

297

196

256

297

154

290

243

293

116

144

154

0

298

2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT

76%

77%

78%

76%

73%

77%

81%

76%

82%

70%

82%

―

77%

GRADUATION RATE

FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT

336

224

304

330

154

332

275

329

140

167

169

0

336

2010 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT

84%

84%

85%

83%

81%

84%

86%

84%

90%

79%

88%

―

84%

GRADUATION RATE

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

47 of 48

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 27, 2017, 3:56 PM EST

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THIS DISTRICT) 18%

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE) 32%

PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE NO

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THIS DISTRICT) 3%

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE) 5%

PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE NO

48 of 48

2017-18 Budget Statement - Troy High School€¦ · 2017-18 Budget Statement . Account Description...

Documents

Transcript of 2017-18 Budget Statement - Troy High School€¦ · 2017-18 Budget Statement . Account Description...