2016-2017 - Nebraska Supreme Court...2016-2017 Nebraska Court Improvement Project Data Report...
Transcript of 2016-2017 - Nebraska Supreme Court...2016-2017 Nebraska Court Improvement Project Data Report...
2016-2017Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Data Report
DISTRICT 8
Team 8.1Blaine, Brown, Cherry, Keya Paha
and Rock Counties
2 2016-2017 Data Reports
Dear Judges, Team Members, Nebraska Legislators, and Members of the Community:
On behalf of the Through the Eyes of the Child Initiative, I would like to thank you for taking time to learn more about Nebraska’s Juvenile Court data.
At the end of the first Nebraska Children’s Summit in 2006, the Through the Eyes of the Child Initiative was officially inaugurated. The idea was to work to improve the court process in abuse/neglect cases in Nebraska by looking at the court system “through the eyes” of children and youth who are affected by the courts. This
involves collaboration by stakeholders from a variety of disciplines, with the idea that those individuals are in the best place to understand the court process.
In 2012, the Through the Eyes of the Child Initiative was expanded, recognizing the importance of improving court processes for those involved in juvenile justice cases. In order to effectuate expansion of the scope of the Initiative, the Through the Eyes teams have worked to include stakeholders who are regularly engaged in juvenile justice work in their local communities.
As is common in numerous states, many of Nebraska’s children are in foster care without permanent homes and families. Too many of our youth do not get the intervention and support needed to become productive, safe, and contributing members of our communities. National court practice and studies have consistently shown that collaboration of individuals involved in the court process improves permanency and outcomes for children and youth. Over the last ten years, our Initiative has sought to accomplish these results. Outstanding work has already been done, but there is more to do in order to continue moving in a positive direction and achieving ever-improving results.
If you are not currently a member of your local team, I would encourage you to become involved. The support of the community, from citizens to members of the Legislature, is vital in such endeavors.
Thank you for the work you do to improve the lives of children and families in Nebraska.
Sincerely,
Michael G. Heavican,Chief Justice of the Nebraska Supreme Court
3The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
4 Introduction
5 District/Team Map
6 Demographics
8 Child Welfare
12 Permanency of Child Welfare Cases
15 Child Welfare | JUSTICE Data
18 Entry Into the Juvenile Justice System
23 Juvenile Justice | JUSTICE Data
28 Probation Supervision
34 References
35 Appendix
Contents
Juvenile Justice
Child Welfare
4 2016-2017 Data Reports
On behalf of the “Eyes” initiative we all want to thank you for your participation and
commitment to the youth and families we serve.
You will find among the various materials provided updated data reports for your team as
well as overall statewide statistics.
The Court Improvement Project has worked closely with JUSTICE to improve how data
is initially entered and ensure that the results are accurate. While there are still areas to
address, the reports provided to you reflect these ongoing efforts and represent the most
accurate data collected about our system to date. While this data cannot be the exclusive reason to pursue certain
changes we know it can be a guide for team discussions about where improvements can be made and how best to
address them.
As always, please feel free to contact anyone affiliated with the Court Improvement Project or myself if you have
any questions or concerns. Thanks to your efforts we have made important changes since we started the initiative in
2006. These latest reports will help us continue to move forward.
Lawrence D. Gendler,
Judge, Sarpy County Separate Juvenile Court
Introduction The Court Improvement Project produces annual data reports that include demographics, data on entry into foster care and permanency, and juvenile justice data. The following sources are referenced throughout the report, including full citation information for data that is publicly available.
5The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
128 11
109
76
34
1
52
12.1
12.3
12.1
8.18.2
8.3
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
10.1c
10.2w
10.3e
5.3
5.2
5.1
6.2 6.1
9.29.1
2.22.3
2.1
Siou
xD
awes
Sher
idan
Box
Butt
e
Scot
ts B
lu�
Bann
er
Mor
rill
Chey
enne
Ki
mba
ll
Gar
den
Deu
el
Gra
nt
Art
hur
Keith
Linc
oln
Fron
tier
Red
Will
ow
Furn
as
Gos
per
Daw
son
Cust
er
Blai
neLo
upG
ar�e
ld
How
ard
Bu�a
lo Kear
ney
Adam
s
Web
ster
Nuc
kolls
Thay
erJe
�ers
on
Gag
e
Paw
nee
Rich
rdso
n
Nem
aha
John
son
Oto
e
Sarp
y
Dou
glas
Was
hing
ton
Burt
Thur
ston
Dak
ota
Dix
on
Ceda
rKn
oxH
oltBo
ydKe
ya P
aha
Brow
n
Cher
ry
Rock
Ant
elop
ePi
erce
Way
ne
Cum
ing
Stan
ton
Mad
ison
Cass
Salin
eFi
llmor
eCl
ay
Ham
ilton
Mer
rick
Nan
ce
Plat
teCo
lfax
Dod
ge
Saun
ders
Butle
r
Polk
Lanc
aste
r
Boon
e
York
Sew
ard
Fran
klin
Har
lan
Phel
ps
Hal
l
Sher
man
Valle
y
Whe
eler
Gre
eley
Loga
n
Thom
as
Hoo
ker
McP
hers
on
Perk
ins
Chas
eH
ayes
Hitc
hcoc
kD
undy
Cha
dron
Ger
ing
Brid
gepo
rt
Kim
ball
Sidn
ey
Rus
hvill
e
Brok
en B
owO
rd
Ain
swor
thO
’Nei
ll
Oga
llala
McC
ook
Alm
a
Hol
dred
geM
inde
nH
astin
gs
Nor
th P
latt
e
Kear
ney
Gra
nd
Isla
ndLe
ton
Schu
yler
Col
umbu
s
Nor
folk
Way
ne
Dako
ta Ci
ty
Frem
ont
Blai
r
Wilb
ur
Cen
tral
C
ity
Dav
idC
ityW
ahoo
Osc
eola Yo
rkSe
war
dLi
ncol
n
Plat
tsm
outh
Neb
rask
a C
ity
Papi
llion
Om
aha
Beat
rice
Aub
urn
Falls
City
Aur
ora
Har
riso
n
Har
risb
urg
Osh
kosh
Cha
ppel
l
Gra
nt
Vale
ntin
e
Elw
ood
Fran
klin
Red
Clou
d
Clay
Cen
ter
Nuc
kolls
Heb
ron
Paw
nee
City
Tecu
mse
h
Sprin
gvie
w
Bass
ett
Harti
ngto
n
Pend
er Teka
mah
Burw
ell
Bart
lett
Gre
eley
Alli
ance
Mul
len
Art
hur
Gra
nt Impe
rial
Benk
elm
anTr
ento
n
Tryo
n
The
dfor
d
Stap
leto
n
Cen
ter
Stoc
kvill
e
Beav
er C
ityFa
irbur
y
Butt
e
Brew
ster
Loup
City
St. P
aul
Cen
ter
Nel
igh
Pier
ce
Stan
ton
Wes
tPo
int
Fulle
rton
Alb
ion
Ponc
a
Gen
eva
Tayl
or
Dist
rict
6
Team
1 - M
AH
Team
2 -
MAH
Dist
rict
5
Team
1 - M
AH
Team
2 -
MAH
Te
am 3
- M
AH
Dist
rict
4 (D
ougl
as)
Te
am M
LDi
stri
ct 3
(Lan
cast
er)
Te
am M
AHDi
stri
ct 2
Te
am 1
- MAH
Te
am 2
- M
AH
Team
3 -
MAH
Dist
rict
11
Team
1 - M
AH
Team
2 -
ML
Te
am 3
- M
L
Team
4 -
ML
Dist
rict
10
Team
1c -
MAH
Te
am 2
e - M
L
Team
3w
- M
L
Dist
rict
9
Team
1 - M
AH
Team
2 -
MAH
Dist
rict
8
Team
1 - M
AH
Team
2 -
ML
Te
am 3
- M
AH
Dist
rict
7
Team
- M
AHDi
stri
ct 12
Te
am 1
- MAH
Te
am 2
- M
AH
Team
3 -
ML
Dist
rict
1
Team
ML
Proj
ect
Coor
dina
tors
:M
AH -
Mar
y An
n Ha
rvey
ML
- Mat
t Le
wis
District/Team Map1
6 2016-2017 Data Reports
Demographics
District 8 Total Youth
Population = 12,640.5
Team 8.1 Total Youth
Under Age 19 = 21.0%
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown County
Cherry CountyKeya Paha County
Rock County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha Blaine Under 19 1,223 645 252 150 15619+ years 4,558 2,378 1,155 586 424
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Tota
l Pop
ula
tion
District 8: Youth Population by County for Team 8.1
1,223.0Cherry50%644.5
Brown27%
252.0Rock10%
150.0Keya Paha
6%
156.0Blaine
7%
All Youth Under 19 for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha BlaineYouth of Color 203.0 33.0 14.0 6.5 0.0White Youth 1,020.0 611.5 238.0 143.5 156.0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Tota
l You
th P
opul
atio
n
District 8: Diversity by County for Team 8.1
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown CountyCherry County
Keya Paha County
Rock County
Boyd County
Garfield CountyGreeley CountyHolt County
Valley County
Wheeler County
Custer County
Howard County
Loup CountySherman County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for District 8
All Youth Under 19 for District 8Cherry
BrownRockKeya Paha
Blaine
Holt
BoydGreeleyValleyGarfield
Wheeler
Custer
Howard
Sherman Loup
Lincoln
30%
10%
6%10%3%
11%
23%
7%Gage
Jefferson
Johnson
Nemaha
Pawnee
Richardson
Saline
Thayer
11%
6%
83%
Cass
Otoe
Sarpy
7%
13%
9%
6%
9%25%
16%
4%5%2%4%
Hamilton
Seward
York
Butler
Colfax
Platte
Saunders
Boone
Merrick
Nance
Polk
Hamilton2,337 23%
Seward4,42144%
York3,34733%
Butler2051.5
10%Colfax3,27417%
Platte8,976.5
45%
Saunders5,50228%
Boone1,29925%
Merrick1,86635%
Nance843.516%
Polk1268.5
24%
22%
32%9%
18%
6%5%
8%Dakota
Dodge
Thurston
Washington
Dixon
Burt
Cedar
6,265.0Dakota
32%
2,599.0Thurston
13%
5,211.0Washington
27%
1,533.0Dixon
8%
1,530.0Burt8%
2,245.5Cedar12%
10%
11%
11%
8%
7%9%
44%
Knox
Cuming
Wayne
Stanton
Antelope
Pierce
Madison
10%5% 2%
1%1%
21%
4%5%8%3%1%
21%
12%5%
1% Cherry
Brown
Rock
Keya Paha
Blaine
Holt
Boyd
Greeley
Valley
Garfield
Wheeler
Custer
1,223.0Cherry50%
644.5Brown27%
252.0Rock10%
150.0Keya Paha
6% 156.0Blaine
7%
2,587.0Holt49%
486.0Boyd9%
615.0Greeley
12%
972.5Valley19%
407.0Garfield
8%153.5
Wheeler3%
2,632.0Custer53%
1,568.0Howard
31%
688.0Sherman
14%
106.0Loup2%
58%
42%
Hall
45%
5%13%
9%
4%3%
9%
7%5% Adams
Webster
Phelps
Kearney
Harlan
Franklin
Clay
Fillmore
Nuckolls
8,134Adams
90%
858Webster
10%
2,356.0Phelps
43%
1,654.5Kearney
31%
798.0Harlan
15%
619.5Franklin
11%
1,591.5Clay43%
1,230.5Fillmore
33%
910.0Nuckolls
24%
6,927.0Dawson
94%
452.5Gosper
6%
1,708.0Keith43%
1,043.5Chase26%
389.0Dundy10%
695.0Perkins
17%
139.0Arthur
4%
2,692.0Red Willow
57%1,154.0Furnas25%
657.5Hitchcock
14%
204.0Hayes
4%
96.0McPherson
1%
9,191.0Lincoln
88%
608.5Frontier
6%
226.5Logan
2%
165.0Thomas
2%
100.0Hooker
1%
14%
6%
9%
6%
1%1%11%
4%
2%2%
43%
1%
Box Butte
Sheridan
Dawes
Morrill
Sioux
Grant
Cheyenne
Kimball
Garden
Deuel
Scotts Bluff
Banner
3,014.5Box Butte
36%
1,288.5Sheridan
15%
2,044.5Dawes
28%
1,229.5Morrill15%
277.5Sioux
4%
139.0Grant2%
2,498.5Cheyenne
60%
893.0Kimball
22%
377.5Garden
9%
391.5Deuel
9%
9,510.0Scotts Bluff
98%
188.0Banner
2%
All Youth Under 19 for District 5, Team 5.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 5, Team 5.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 5, Team 5.1
All Youth Under 19 for District 5
All Youth Under 19 for District 2
All Youth Under 19 for District 1 All Youth Under 19 for District 6
All Youth Under 19 for District 6, Team 6.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 7
All Youth Under 19 for District 8
All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.1
All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.2 All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.3e
All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.2w
All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.1c
All Youth Under 19 for District 10
Buffalo
All Youth Under 19 for District 9
All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.1
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.4
All Youth Under 19 for District 12
All Youth Under 19 for District 12, Team 12.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 12, Team 12.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 12, Team 12.1
26%
2%
6%
4%
1%3%
1%
10%4%2%
1%
0%
35%
2%
1%
1% 0%All Youth Under 19 for District 11
DawsonGosperKeithChaseDundyPerkinsArthurRed WillowFurnasHitchcockHayesMcPhersonLincoln
Lincoln
30%
10%
6%10%3%
11%
23%
7%Gage
Jefferson
Johnson
Nemaha
Pawnee
Richardson
Saline
Thayer
11%
6%
83%
Cass
Otoe
Sarpy
7%
13%
9%
6%
9%25%
16%
4%5%2%4%
Hamilton
Seward
York
Butler
Colfax
Platte
Saunders
Boone
Merrick
Nance
Polk
Hamilton2,337 23%
Seward4,42144%
York3,34733%
Butler2051.5
10%Colfax3,27417%
Platte8,976.5
45%
Saunders5,50228%
Boone1,29925%
Merrick1,86635%
Nance843.516%
Polk1268.5
24%
22%
32%9%
18%
6%5%
8%Dakota
Dodge
Thurston
Washington
Dixon
Burt
Cedar
6,265.0Dakota
32%
2,599.0Thurston
13%
5,211.0Washington
27%
1,533.0Dixon
8%
1,530.0Burt8%
2,245.5Cedar12%
10%
11%
11%
8%
7%9%
44%
Knox
Cuming
Wayne
Stanton
Antelope
Pierce
Madison
10%5% 2%
1%1%
21%
4%5%8%3%1%
21%
12%5%
1% Cherry
Brown
Rock
Keya Paha
Blaine
Holt
Boyd
Greeley
Valley
Garfield
Wheeler
Custer
1,223.0Cherry50%
644.5Brown27%
252.0Rock10%
150.0Keya Paha
6% 156.0Blaine
7%
2,587.0Holt49%
486.0Boyd9%
615.0Greeley
12%
972.5Valley19%
407.0Garfield
8%153.5
Wheeler3%
2,632.0Custer53%
1,568.0Howard
31%
688.0Sherman
14%
106.0Loup2%
58%
42%
Hall
45%
5%13%
9%
4%3%
9%
7%5% Adams
Webster
Phelps
Kearney
Harlan
Franklin
Clay
Fillmore
Nuckolls
8,134Adams
90%
858Webster
10%
2,356.0Phelps
43%
1,654.5Kearney
31%
798.0Harlan
15%
619.5Franklin
11%
1,591.5Clay43%
1,230.5Fillmore
33%
910.0Nuckolls
24%
6,927.0Dawson
94%
452.5Gosper
6%
1,708.0Keith43%
1,043.5Chase26%
389.0Dundy10%
695.0Perkins
17%
139.0Arthur
4%
2,692.0Red Willow
57%1,154.0Furnas25%
657.5Hitchcock
14%
204.0Hayes
4%
96.0McPherson
1%
9,191.0Lincoln
88%
608.5Frontier
6%
226.5Logan
2%
165.0Thomas
2%
100.0Hooker
1%
14%
6%
9%
6%
1%1%11%
4%
2%2%
43%
1%
Box Butte
Sheridan
Dawes
Morrill
Sioux
Grant
Cheyenne
Kimball
Garden
Deuel
Scotts Bluff
Banner
3,014.5Box Butte
36%
1,288.5Sheridan
15%
2,044.5Dawes
28%
1,229.5Morrill15%
277.5Sioux
4%
139.0Grant2%
2,498.5Cheyenne
60%
893.0Kimball
22%
377.5Garden
9%
391.5Deuel
9%
9,510.0Scotts Bluff
98%
188.0Banner
2%
All Youth Under 19 for District 5, Team 5.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 5, Team 5.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 5, Team 5.1
All Youth Under 19 for District 5
All Youth Under 19 for District 2
All Youth Under 19 for District 1 All Youth Under 19 for District 6
All Youth Under 19 for District 6, Team 6.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 7
All Youth Under 19 for District 8
All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.1
All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.2 All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.3e
All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.2w
All Youth Under 19 for District 10, Team 10.1c
All Youth Under 19 for District 10
Buffalo
All Youth Under 19 for District 9
All Youth Under 19 for District 8, Team 8.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.1
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 11, Team 11.4
All Youth Under 19 for District 12
All Youth Under 19 for District 12, Team 12.3
All Youth Under 19 for District 12, Team 12.2
All Youth Under 19 for District 12, Team 12.1
26%
2%
6%
4%
1%3%
1%
10%4%2%
1%
0%
35%
2%
1%
1% 0%All Youth Under 19 for District 11
DawsonGosperKeithChaseDundyPerkinsArthurRed WillowFurnasHitchcockHayesMcPhersonLincoln
Youth Population2
The most recent available data from the U.S. Census Bureau was used to estimate the percent of children under 19 living in poverty1 the youth population2 and the youth population of color for your team and the state. Information regarding the youth population in your area can be helpful to determine what resources may be needed through a culturally-com-petent framework. Children living in poverty are at a higher risk of maltreatment and offending, and may need access to increased resources.
7The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
For poverty comparison across the state by county, see Appendix, page 35.
Child Poverty Rate
Demographics, continued
State District 8 Team 8.116.4% 12.6% 13.1%
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown County
Cherry CountyKeya Paha County
Rock County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha Blaine Under 19 1,223 645 252 150 15619+ years 4,558 2,378 1,155 586 424
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Tota
l Pop
ula
tion
District 8: Youth Population by County for Team 8.1
1,223.0Cherry50%644.5
Brown27%
252.0Rock10%
150.0Keya Paha
6%
156.0Blaine
7%
All Youth Under 19 for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha BlaineYouth of Color 203.0 33.0 14.0 6.5 0.0White Youth 1,020.0 611.5 238.0 143.5 156.0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Tota
l You
th P
opul
atio
n
District 8: Diversity by County for Team 8.1
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown CountyCherry County
Keya Paha County
Rock County
Boyd County
Garfield CountyGreeley CountyHolt County
Valley County
Wheeler County
Custer County
Howard County
Loup CountySherman County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for District 8
All Youth Under 19 for District 8Cherry
BrownRockKeya Paha
Blaine
Holt
BoydGreeleyValleyGarfield
Wheeler
Custer
Howard
Sherman Loup
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown County
Cherry CountyKeya Paha County
Rock County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha Blaine Under 19 1,223 645 252 150 15619+ years 4,558 2,378 1,155 586 424
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Tota
l Pop
ula
tion
District 8: Youth Population by County for Team 8.1
1,223.0Cherry50%644.5
Brown27%
252.0Rock10%
150.0Keya Paha
6%
156.0Blaine
7%
All Youth Under 19 for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha BlaineYouth of Color 203.0 33.0 14.0 6.5 0.0White Youth 1,020.0 611.5 238.0 143.5 156.0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Tota
l You
th P
opul
atio
n
District 8: Diversity by County for Team 8.1
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown CountyCherry County
Keya Paha County
Rock County
Boyd County
Garfield CountyGreeley CountyHolt County
Valley County
Wheeler County
Custer County
Howard County
Loup CountySherman County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for District 8
All Youth Under 19 for District 8Cherry
BrownRockKeya Paha
Blaine
Holt
BoydGreeleyValleyGarfield
Wheeler
Custer
Howard
Sherman Loup
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for District 8
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for Team 8.1
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown County
Cherry CountyKeya Paha County
Rock County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha Blaine Under 19 1,223 645 252 150 15619+ years 4,558 2,378 1,155 586 424
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Tota
l Pop
ula
tion
District 8: Youth Population by County for Team 8.1
1,223.0Cherry50%644.5
Brown27%
252.0Rock10%
150.0Keya Paha
6%
156.0Blaine
7%
All Youth Under 19 for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha BlaineYouth of Color 203.0 33.0 14.0 6.5 0.0White Youth 1,020.0 611.5 238.0 143.5 156.0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Tota
l You
th P
opul
atio
n
District 8: Diversity by County for Team 8.1
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown CountyCherry County
Keya Paha County
Rock County
Boyd County
Garfield CountyGreeley CountyHolt County
Valley County
Wheeler County
Custer County
Howard County
Loup CountySherman County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for District 8
All Youth Under 19 for District 8Cherry
BrownRockKeya Paha
Blaine
Holt
BoydGreeleyValleyGarfield
Wheeler
Custer
Howard
Sherman Loup
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown County
Cherry CountyKeya Paha County
Rock County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha Blaine Under 19 1,223 645 252 150 15619+ years 4,558 2,378 1,155 586 424
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
Tota
l Pop
ula
tion
District 8: Youth Population by County for Team 8.1
1,223.0Cherry50%644.5
Brown27%
252.0Rock10%
150.0Keya Paha
6%
156.0Blaine
7%
All Youth Under 19 for Team 8.1
Cherry Brown Rock Keya Paha BlaineYouth of Color 203.0 33.0 14.0 6.5 0.0White Youth 1,020.0 611.5 238.0 143.5 156.0
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Tota
l You
th P
opul
atio
n
District 8: Diversity by County for Team 8.1
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.0Blaine County
Brown CountyCherry County
Keya Paha County
Rock County
Boyd County
Garfield CountyGreeley CountyHolt County
Valley County
Wheeler County
Custer County
Howard County
Loup CountySherman County
Poverty rate (%) for children under age 18 by County for District 8
All Youth Under 19 for District 8Cherry
BrownRockKeya Paha
Blaine
Holt
BoydGreeleyValleyGarfield
Wheeler
Custer
Howard
Sherman Loup
Child Poverty Rate3
2
In an ideal world there would be no poverty and monetary inequality would not exist. However, this is not the case, the graph (below or adjacent for teams with more than 3 counties) shows what an equal distribution of wealth would look like at different levels (i.e. the grey line). The blue line shows how poverty is actually affecting your team and district. The closer the blue line is to the center of the graph the less poverty there is in its corresponding county while those further out represent more poverty.
8 2016-2017 Data Reports Reentries into Foster Care Team 1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 2.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 2.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 2.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 3
Reentries into Foster Care State of Nebraska
Reentries into Foster Care Team 4
Reentries into Foster Care District 5
Reentries into Foster Care Team 5.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 5.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 6.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 6.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 7
Reentries into Foster Care Team 8.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 8.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 8.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 9.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 9.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 10.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 10.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 10.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.4
Reentries into Foster Care Team 12.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 12.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 12.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.2
14.5% 13.7% 14.5%
6.1% 6.6% 6.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
8.9% 9.3% 11.1%
12.2% 14.7% 8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
0.0%
28.6%
14.3%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2015 2016
4.2%
12.8%18.7%
10.3%
21.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
17.0%21.2%
18.0%
5.0%
6.6% 10.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
11.7%16.0% 13.7%
4.2%
5.5%3.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
13.9% 13.8% 15.5%
6.4% 6.1%7.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
11.9% 9.5%
17.8%0.9%
11.2%
9.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
20.3%
6.1%
17.3%
5.1%
3.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
26.5%20.1%
10.3%
12.1%17.4%
10.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
11.7% 12.2%18.5%
1.1% 0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
0.0%
25.0% 25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
2014 2015 2016
25.0%
7.1%0.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
20.0%20.0%
25.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
21.3%15.8% 16.6%
6.7%
3.9% 4.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
19.0% 17.3%11.1%
5.1%3.4%
8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
21.0%
6.9% 4.9%
3.2%
10.3%
1.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
8.4% 5.0%
23.0%8.3%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
0.0%5.8%
18.2%No
Data
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
5.2% 6.1% 3.7%
5.3% 0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
9.1%
0.0%
4.5%
7.1%0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
10.8%6.5%
0.0%
8.1%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
15.3% 17.5%23.7%
10.3% 8.8%2.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
15.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
7.1%10.6%
3.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
9.5% 11.5% 11.9%
12.7%1.4%
6.4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
3.7%
6.2%
22.2% 18.2%
10.5%
11.8%
2.6%
3.7%
25.0%
20.8%
2014
9.1%
21.4%
14.8% 14.5% 13.7% 14.5%
6.6% 6.1% 6.6% 6.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
21.4%
8.9% 9.3% 11.1%
5.6%
12.2% 14.7% 8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2013 2014 2015 2016
11.1% 9.1%
28.6%5.6%
14.3%
21.4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
27.8%
4.2%
12.8%18.7%
20.8%10.3%
21.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
16.8% 17.0%21.2% 18.0%
3.2% 5.0%
6.6% 10.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
9.5% 11.7%16.0% 13.7%
3.2%4.2%
5.5%3.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
17.0% 13.9% 13.8% 15.5%
5.8%6.4% 6.1%
7.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
11.9% 9.5%17.8%
0.9%11.2%
9.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
NoData
8.1%
20.3%
6.1%
17.3%5.7%
5.1%
3.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
23.4% 26.5%20.1%
10.3%
12.0%12.1%
17.4%
10.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
14.0% 11.7% 12.2%18.5%
8.0%
1.1%
3.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
100.0%
0.0%25.0% 25.0%
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
2013 2014 2015 2016
26.3% 25.0%
7.1%0.0%
25.0%
0.0%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
0.0%
20.0% 20.0%25.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
11.5%
21.3%15.8% 16.6%
9.8%
6.7%
3.9% 4.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
13.1%19.0% 17.3%
11.1%
5.3%
5.1%3.4%
8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
NoData
21.0%
6.9% 4.9%
3.2%
10.3%
1.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
NoData 8.4% 5.0%
23.0%8.3%
2.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
0.0% 5.8%
18.2%No
Data
11.8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
24.3%
5.2% 6.1% 3.7%
12.1%
5.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
17.9%9.1%
3.7%
10.7%
4.5%
7.1%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
8.4% 10.8%6.5%
8.3%8.1%
6.2%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
10.8%15.3% 17.5%
23.7%7.7%
10.3% 8.8%2.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
22.2%15.4%
23.5%18.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
8.3% 7.1%10.6%
3.0%
16.7% 10.5%
2.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
13.3%9.5% 11.5% 11.9%
11.1%12.7%
1.4%6.4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
Child Welfare
State
This section presents data on youth in the Nebraska Child Welfare System provided by the Fostering Court Improve-ment (FCI) team. DHHS does not directly give data to CIP; instead, like all states, data is submitted to the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) and the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS). The FCI uses the AFCARS and NCANDS to create a report that inform the courts and child welfare agen-cies in an effort to facilitate discussions among local decision makers. More data than what is provided in this report can be found at their website: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/. Please note that this data is provided in aggregate and not in its raw form. Data is broken down by county, DHHS service area, judicial district, and Through the Eyes of a Child teams. Data presented in this report corresponds with data provided for the teams as FCI currently has the teams broken down. The Nebraska Court Improvement team is work with FCI and DHHS to update the changes of the teams for future reports.
Re-entries into Foster Care4
9The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Child Welfare, continued
Reentries into Foster Care Team 1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 2.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 2.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 2.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 3
Reentries into Foster Care State of Nebraska
Reentries into Foster Care Team 4
Reentries into Foster Care District 5
Reentries into Foster Care Team 5.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 5.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 6.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 6.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 7
Reentries into Foster Care Team 8.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 8.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 8.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 9.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 9.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 10.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 10.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 10.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.4
Reentries into Foster Care Team 12.1
Reentries into Foster Care Team 12.2
Reentries into Foster Care Team 12.3
Reentries into Foster Care Team 11.2
14.5% 13.7% 14.5%
6.1% 6.6% 6.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
8.9% 9.3% 11.1%
12.2% 14.7% 8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
0.0%
28.6%
14.3%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2015 2016
4.2%
12.8%18.7%
10.3%
21.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
17.0%21.2%
18.0%
5.0%
6.6% 10.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
11.7%16.0% 13.7%
4.2%
5.5%3.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
13.9% 13.8% 15.5%
6.4% 6.1%7.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
11.9% 9.5%
17.8%0.9%
11.2%
9.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
20.3%
6.1%
17.3%
5.1%
3.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
26.5%20.1%
10.3%
12.1%17.4%
10.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
11.7% 12.2%18.5%
1.1% 0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
0.0%
25.0% 25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
2014 2015 2016
25.0%
7.1%0.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
20.0%20.0%
25.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
21.3%15.8% 16.6%
6.7%
3.9% 4.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
19.0% 17.3%11.1%
5.1%3.4%
8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
21.0%
6.9% 4.9%
3.2%
10.3%
1.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
8.4% 5.0%
23.0%8.3%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
0.0%5.8%
18.2%No
Data
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
5.2% 6.1% 3.7%
5.3% 0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
9.1%
0.0%
4.5%
7.1%0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
10.8%6.5%
0.0%
8.1%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
15.3% 17.5%23.7%
10.3% 8.8%2.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
15.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
7.1%10.6%
3.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
9.5% 11.5% 11.9%
12.7%1.4%
6.4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2014 2015 2016
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
3.7%
6.2%
22.2% 18.2%
10.5%
11.8%
2.6%
3.7%
25.0%
20.8%
2014
9.1%
21.4%
14.8% 14.5% 13.7% 14.5%
6.6% 6.1% 6.6% 6.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
21.4%
8.9% 9.3% 11.1%
5.6%
12.2% 14.7% 8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
2013 2014 2015 2016
11.1% 9.1%
28.6%5.6%
14.3%
21.4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
27.8%
4.2%
12.8%18.7%
20.8%10.3%
21.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
16.8% 17.0%21.2% 18.0%
3.2% 5.0%
6.6% 10.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
9.5% 11.7%16.0% 13.7%
3.2%4.2%
5.5%3.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
17.0% 13.9% 13.8% 15.5%
5.8%6.4% 6.1%
7.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
11.9% 9.5%17.8%
0.9%11.2%
9.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
NoData
8.1%
20.3%
6.1%
17.3%5.7%
5.1%
3.0%
0.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
23.4% 26.5%20.1%
10.3%
12.0%12.1%
17.4%
10.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
14.0% 11.7% 12.2%18.5%
8.0%
1.1%
3.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
100.0%
0.0%25.0% 25.0%
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
2013 2014 2015 2016
26.3% 25.0%
7.1%0.0%
25.0%
0.0%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
0.0%
20.0% 20.0%25.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
11.5%
21.3%15.8% 16.6%
9.8%
6.7%
3.9% 4.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
13.1%19.0% 17.3%
11.1%
5.3%
5.1%3.4%
8.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
NoData
21.0%
6.9% 4.9%
3.2%
10.3%
1.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
NoData 8.4% 5.0%
23.0%8.3%
2.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
0.0% 5.8%
18.2%No
Data
11.8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
24.3%
5.2% 6.1% 3.7%
12.1%
5.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
17.9%9.1%
3.7%
10.7%
4.5%
7.1%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
8.4% 10.8%6.5%
8.3%8.1%
6.2%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
10.8%15.3% 17.5%
23.7%7.7%
10.3% 8.8%2.0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
22.2%15.4%
23.5%18.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
8.3% 7.1%10.6%
3.0%
16.7% 10.5%
2.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
13.3%9.5% 11.5% 11.9%
11.1%12.7%
1.4%6.4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2013 2014 2015 2016
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge% Re-entering 12 months or more after Previous Discharge
% Re-entering within 12 months of Previous Discharge
Re-entries into Foster Care4
Re-entry to foster care is when a child who was previously removed and placed in foster care later returns home and then is again removed from the home. This does not include cases where a family with a prior removal later becomes involved in a voluntary case.
10 2016-2017 Data Reports
Child Welfare, continued
Placement Settings of Children in Care
0 20 40 60 80 100
Non−Relative Foster Care
Relative Foster Care
Pre−Adoptive Home
Group Home
Institution
Home Visit
Missing from Care
Independent Living Placement
District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards):Placement Settings of Children in Care
Percentage of Children In Placement Setting
District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2017District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2016Statewide on September 30 2017
Type of Out-of-Home Care5
Because of the rapid changes in the foster care population, the data on "Type of Out-of-Home Care" are a breakdown of the placement of all children in foster care on a single day – September 30, 2017.
11The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Child Welfare, continued
Average Per-Diem Foster Care Payments by Place Setting
0 50 100 150 200 250
Non−Relative Foster Care
Relative Foster Care
Pre−Adoptive Home
Group Home
Institution
Home Visit
Missing from Care
Independent Living Placement
District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards): Average Per−DiemFoster Care Payments by Placement Setting
Average Per−Diem Payment (Dollars per Day)
District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2017District 8−Team 1 on September 30 2016Statewide on September 30 2017
Type of Out-of-Home Care5
12 2016-2017 Data Reports
Permanency of Child Welfare Cases
0 20 40 60 80 100
Reunification(N=3)
Adoption(N=1)
Transfer(N=0)
Emancipation(N=0)
Guardianship(N=3)
Missing from Care(N=0)
Death(N=0)
Unknown(N=0)
District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards):Reasons for Discharge
Percentage of Children Discharged
District 8−Team 1 (12 months)District 8−Team 1 (180 months)Statewide (12 months)
Reasons for Discharge Team 8.1
Type of Discharge7
The data show the types of discharges from the Nebraska Child Welfare System for your team
The permanency data examine the population of youth who were discharged from the child welfare system.
13The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Permanency of Child Welfare Cases, continued 0
1020
3040
50
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Last
12
StatewideDistrict 8−Team 1 average = 11 monthsStatewide average = 15 months
District 8−Team 1 (excluding OJS Wards): Median Months to Dischargeby Year, FFY2003 to FFY2017
Time
from
Rem
oval
to D
ischa
rge
(Mon
ths)
Median Months to Discharge by Year, FFY 2003 to FFY 20177 for Team
14 2016-2017 Data Reports
Permanency of Child Welfare Cases, continued
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to R
euni
ficat
ion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Sta
te o
f Neb
rask
aPe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
5.1
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 8
.2Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
11.
1
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 2
.1Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
5.3
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 9
.1Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
11.
3
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 2
.2Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
6.1
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 9
.2
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 1
1.4
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 2
.3Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
6.2
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 1
0.1
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 1
2.1
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 3
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 7
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 1
0.2
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 1
2.2
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 4
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 8
.1Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
10.
3Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
12.
3
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 1
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 5
.2Pe
rcen
tage
of Y
outh
s Disc
harg
ed to
Re
unifi
catio
n in
less
than
12
mon
ths T
eam
8.3
Perc
enta
ge o
f You
ths D
ischa
rged
to
Reun
ifica
tion
in le
ss th
an 1
2 m
onth
s Tea
m 1
1.2
Not
e: D
ata
from
Paw
nee
coun
ty w
as n
ot p
rovi
ded
. The
mon
ths o
f Sep
tem
ber a
nd
Oct
ober
do
not h
ave
any
dat
a fro
m N
emah
a C
ount
y.
Not
e: N
ance
Cou
nty
was
not
incl
uded
in th
e d
ata.
Not
e: C
edar
Cou
nty
was
not
incl
uded
in th
e d
ata.
Not
e: B
lain
e, C
herry
, Key
a Pa
ha, a
nd R
ock
coun
ties w
ere
not i
nclu
ded
in d
ata.
Not
e: B
oyd
, Gar
field
, Val
ley,
and
Whe
eler
wer
e no
t inc
lud
ed in
the
dat
a.
Not
e: L
oup
and
She
rman
cou
ntie
s wer
e no
t inc
lud
ed in
the
dat
a.
Not
e: H
arla
n co
unty
was
not
incl
uded
in th
e d
ata.
Not
e: C
lay
coun
ty w
as n
ot in
clud
ed in
the
dat
a.
Not
e: A
rthur
and
Dun
dy
coun
ties w
ere
not i
nclu
ded
in th
e d
ata.
Not
e: H
ayes
Cou
nty
was
not
incl
uded
in th
e d
ata.
Not
e: O
nly
Linco
ln C
ount
y d
ata
was
ava
ilabl
e fo
r tea
m 1
1.4.
Not
e: G
rant
, Mor
rill,
and
Sio
ux c
ount
ies w
ere
not i
nclu
ded
in th
e d
ata.
Not
e: D
euel
cou
nty
was
not
incl
uded
in th
e d
ata.
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
60.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7No
v-17
Dec-
17
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
60.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7No
v-17
Dec-
17
0.00
%
5.00
%
10.0
0%
15.0
0%
20.0
0%
25.0
0%
30.0
0%
35.0
0%
40.0
0%
45.0
0%
50.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7De
c-17
0.00
%
5.00
%
10.0
0%
15.0
0%
20.0
0%
25.0
0%
30.0
0%
35.0
0%
40.0
0%
45.0
0%
50.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7No
v-17
Dec-
17
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
60.0
0%
70.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%
5.00
%
10.0
0%
15.0
0%
20.0
0%
25.0
0%
30.0
0%
35.0
0%
40.0
0%
45.0
0%
50.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
60.0
0%
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7No
v-17
Dec-
17
0.00
%
5.00
%
10.0
0%
15.0
0%
20.0
0%
25.0
0%
30.0
0%
35.0
0%
40.0
0%
45.0
0%
50.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%20
.00%
40.0
0%60
.00%
80.0
0%10
0.00
%12
0.00
%
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00%
20.00
%40
.00%
60.00
%80
.00%
100.0
0%12
0.00%
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
Gag
e C
ount
y
Jeffe
rson
Cou
nty
John
son
Co
unty
Nem
aha
Co
unty
Rich
ards
on C
oun
ty
Salin
e C
ount
y
Tha
yer C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Cas
s Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Oto
e C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Sarp
y C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Lanc
aste
r Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Dou
glas
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Ham
ilton
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l St a
nda
rd
Butle
r Cou
nty
Col
fax
Cou
nty
Plat
te C
oun
ty
Saun
ders
Co
unty
Stat
e
Fede
ral S
tand
ard
Tha
yer C
ount
y
Boon
e C
ount
y
Mer
rickC
ount
y
Polk
Co
unty
Stat
e
Fede
ral S
tand
ard
Dod
ge C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Burt
Cou
nty
Dak
ota
Co
unty
Dixo
n C
oun
ty
Thur
ston
Co
unty
Was
hing
ton
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Ant
elop
eCou
nty
Knox
Co
unty
Mad
ison
Co
unty
Pier
ce C
oun
ty
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Stat
e
Cum
ing
Cou
nty
Brow
n C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Nuc
kolls
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Fillm
ore
Cou
nty
Phel
ps C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Kear
ney
Cou
nty
Fran
klin
Cou
nty
Web
ster
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Buffa
lo C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Hall C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Daw
son
Cou
nty
Gos
per C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Cha
se C
ount
y
Perk
ins C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Keith
Cou
nty
Hitc
hcoc
k C
ount
y
Red
Willo
w C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Furn
as C
ount
y
Linco
ln C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Daw
es C
ount
y
Sher
idan
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Box
Butte
Cou
nty
Gar
den
Cou
nty
Kim
ball C
ount
y
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Che
yenn
e C
ount
y
Bann
er C
ount
y
Scot
ts B
luff
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
60.0
0%
70.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7No
v-17
Dec-
17
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
0.00
%
5.00
%
10.0
0%
15.0
0%
20.0
0%
25.0
0%
30.0
0%
35.0
0%
40.0
0%
45.0
0%
50.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
60.0
0%
70.0
0%
80.0
0%
90.0
0%
100.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%20
.00%
40.0
0%60
.00%
80.0
0%10
0.00
%12
0.00
%
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
0.00
%
20.0
0%
40.0
0%
60.0
0%
80.0
0%
100.
00%
120.
00%
Jan-
17Fe
b-17
Mar
-17
Apr-1
7M
ay-1
7Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7Au
g-17
Sep-
17O
ct-1
7No
v-17
Dec-
17
0.00
%
10.0
0%
20.0
0%
30.0
0%
40.0
0%
50.0
0%
60.0
0%
70.0
0%
Jan-
17Fe
b-1
7M
ar-1
7A
pr-1
7M
ay-
17Ju
n-17
Jul-1
7A
ug-1
7Se
p-1
7O
ct-1
7N
ov-1
7D
ec-1
7
How
ard
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
era
l Sta
nda
rd
Cus
ter C
ount
y
Holt
Cou
nty
Stat
e
Fed
e ra
l Sta
nda
rd
Gre
eley
Cou
nty
Not
e: A
dam
s cou
nty
was
not
incl
uded
in th
e d
ata.
Reunifications within 12 Months8
Permanency of Child Welfare Cases, continued
15The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Child Welfare | JUSTICE DataChild Welfare | JUSTICE DataThe Child Welfare Case data is obtained from the Judicial Users System To Improve Court Efficiency (JUSTICE), the Nebraska Supreme Court's Case and Financial Management System for Nebraska trial courts. Clerks enter court infor-mation on hearings and orders into JUSTICE as they occur in a case. The Court Improvement Project extracts data from Cognos, the Administrative Office of the Court’s data management system, which extracts data directly from JUS-TICE for reporting purposes. This report presents an overview of data entered into JUSTICE for fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018. Fiscal years run from June 30th to July 1st each year.
Since the last data report, there have been some changes in case progression standards based on Nebraska Rule § 6-104. The Nebraska Court Improvement Project is working closely with JUSTICE staff, Judges, business analysts, and clerks to improve measurement and standardize data entry into JUSTICE to create a real time data dashboard for each Through the Eyes of a Child (TEOC) team. This will be found on our website, estimated time of completion is October, 2018.
The data presented in this report, depict the number of cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of 2017-2018 data from JUSTICE. To get a measure of case termination, a calculation of total days is computed from the date the petition was submitted to the date the case was terminated. Any case that was closed during the fiscal year is presented in this report. Additionally, the average months for the state, TEOC district, and TEOC team’s case ter-mination is included. This data does not include any youth who was transferred in or out because JUSTICE does not currently track where the youth transferred from or where they transferred. Not knowing all of the information for the youth’s case does not allow for proper data analysis. The Nebraska Court Improvement Project (CIP) is working with JUSTICE developers to better tracking transfer cases.
The state of Nebraska had a total of 1,602 child welfare cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017; 26 were for abandon-ment, 205 were for abuse, 176 were for homelessness, and 1,195 were for neglect. The following graph depicts the length of time it took your team to terminate a case, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate a case, and for the state as a whole to terminate their cases. Additionally, it is important to note that 6 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 947.66) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 525.9; F(1,1,600) = 3.837, p = .050].
For the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018, a total of 1,017 child welfare cases were terminated. Of these 1,017 cases, 32 were for abandonment, 136 were for abuse, 109 were for homelessness, and 740 were for neglect. All youth had a judge assigned for this fiscal year. However, because the full year has not come to an end a statistical analysis that compares time to termination for youth with a judge assigned to those without a judge assigned is not possible at this time. The graphs pertaining to fiscal year 2017-2018 depict the length of time it took your team to terminate a case, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate a case, and for the state as a whole to terminate their cases.
16 2016-2017 Data Reports
Child Welfare | JUSTICE Data, continued
Time to Case Termination Team 1
Time to Case Termination Team 4
Time to Case Termination Team 7
Time to Case Termination Team 10.3
Time to Case Termination Team 11.3
Time to Case Termination Team 12.3
41.0% 38.9%
64.5%
19.3% 17.8%
24.2%
15.7%28.9%
11.3%
7.2%
5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=83
FY 2016n=90
FY 2017n=62
56.0%64.5%
36.2%24.2%
7.8% 11.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 1
16.1% 18.6%
57.7%17.1%
18.9%
35.8%
20.5% 13.2%
6.6%
13.7%11.4%
14.7%19.5%
17.8% 18.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=409
FY 2016n=370
FY 2017n=106
56.0% 57.7%
36.2% 35.8%
7.8% 6.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 4
16.9% 18.2%
44.4%
23.4% 21.8%
55.6%
23.4%18.2%
11.7% 23.6%
9.1%
12.7%15.6%
5.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=77
FY 2016n=55
FY 2017n=9
56.0%44.4%
36.2% 55.6%
7.8%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 7
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
56.0%64.0%
50%
36.2%28.0%
50%
7.8% 8.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 10 Team 10.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2015n=35
FY 2016n=28
FY 2017n=28
Chart Title
56.0%48.6%
9.1%
36.2%41.9%
45.5%
7.8% 9.5%
45.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 11 Team 11.3
22.6%
37.2%
58.8%14.5%
33.7%
33.3%
4.8%
3.5%
7.8%
9.7%
12.8%
12.9%
11.6%
35.5%
1.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=62
FY 2016n=86
FY 2017n=51
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
State District 12 Team 12.3
1096 days and up over 3 years
731-1095 days within 3 years
545-730 days within 2 years
366-545 days within 18 months
181-365 days within 1 year
0-180 days within 6 months
37.5%
18.2%
50.0%
50.0%
18.2%
12.5%
12.5%
37.5%
18.2%
18.2%
27.3%
42.9%
14.3%9.1%
45.5%46.4%
25.7%
14.3%
10.7%
45.5%14.3%
7.1%
7.1%8.6%
5.7%2.9%
7.8%
36.2%
56.0%63.6% 58.8%
33.3%30.3%
6.1% 7.8%
CW Case Termination - Team 1
CW Case Termination - Team 5.2
CW Case Termination - Team 12.2
CW Case Termination - Team 11.2
CW Case Termination - Team 11.3
CW Case Termination - Team 5.3
CW Case Termination - Team 11.1
CW Case Termination - Team 11.4
CW Case Termination - Team 6.1
CW Case Termination - Team 10.1
CW Case Termination - Team 8.3
CW Case Termination - Team 8.2
CW Case Termination - Team 8.1
CW Case Termination - Team 2.1 CW Case Termination - Team 7CW Case Termination - Team 5.1
CW Case Termination - Team 12.1
CW Case Termination - Team 10.2
CW Case Termination - Team 10.3
CW Case Termination - Team 9.1
Lincoln
CW Case Termination - Team 12.3
22.70%
47.13%
22.20%
26.44%
18.40%
12.64%
12.90%
2.30%15.80%
8.05%8.10%
3.45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 1
n=87
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
34.80%
18.70%
19.70%21.40%
22.70%15.40%
7.60%13.80%1.50%
11.60% 13.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 1
n=66
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26,2018
1096 thru highest - over 3 years
731 thru 1095- up to 3 years
546 thru 730 days - up to 2 years
366-545 days - up to 18 months
181-365 days - up to 1 year
0-180 days - up to 6 months
22.70%16.70%
22.20% 30.20%
50.0%
18.40%21.90% 16.7%
12.90%10.40% 16.7%
15.80%15.60%
16.7%8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 2n=96
Team 2.1n=6
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%13.50% 16.70%
18.70% 30.80%
50.00%
21.40%
21.20%
15.40%
19.20% 16.70%
13.80%3.80%
16.70%11.60% 11.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
Districtn=52
Team 2.1n=6
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 2.2
22.70%16.70%
9.1%
22.20% 30.20%36.4%
18.40%21.90%
45.5%12.90%10.40%
9.1%
15.80%15.60%
8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 2n=96
Team 2.2n=11
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%13.50% 0.00%
No …
18.70% 30.80%
21.40%
21.20%
15.40%
19.20%
13.80%3.80%
11.60% 11.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 2n=52
Team 2.2n=0
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 2.3
22.70%16.70% 19.0%
22.20% 30.20% 27.8%
18.40%21.90% 19.0%
12.90%10.40%
10.1%
15.80%15.60%
17.7%
8.10% 5.20% 6.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 2n=96
Team 2.3n=79
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%13.50% 13.00%
18.70% 30.80% 28.30%
21.40%
21.20% 23.90%
15.40%
19.20% 19.60%
13.80%3.80% 2.20%
11.60% 11.50% 13.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 2n=52
Team 2.3n=46
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 3
22.70% 26.30%
22.20%20.10%
18.40% 14.30%
12.90%12.50%
15.80%16.50%
8.10% 10.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 3n=224
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 22.50%
18.70%20.00%
21.40% 15.80%
15.40% 17.50%
13.80% 15.00%
11.60% 9.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 3n=120
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 4
22.70% 19.00%
22.20%
18.30%
18.40%23.10%
12.90% 16.70%
15.80% 13.60%
8.10% 9.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 4n=389
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.60%
18.70%16.90%
21.40%
15.70%
15.40%
17.20%
13.80%19.90%
11.60% 12.70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 4n=267
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.80%
23.1%
22.20% 28.10% 19.2%
18.40% 14.10%15.4%
12.90% 22.20%
15.4%
15.80%12.60% 26.9%
8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 5n=135
Team 5.1n=26
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%14.00%
26.70%
18.70%24.40%
40.00%21.40%30.20%
13.30%
15.40%
7.00%
13.80% 12.80% 6.70%
11.60% 11.60% 13.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 5n=86
Team 5.1n=15
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.80% 17.8%
22.20% 28.10%33.3%
18.40% 14.10%10.0%
12.90% 22.20% 21.1%
15.80%12.60% 11.1%
8.10% 5.20% 6.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 5n=135
Team 5.2n=90
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%14.00% 10.20%
18.70%24.40%
23.70%
21.40%30.20% 39.00%
15.40%
7.00%5.10%
13.80% 12.80% 10.20%
11.60% 11.60% 11.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 5n=86
Team 5.2n=59
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.80%
10.5%
22.20% 28.10%
15.8%
18.40% 14.10%
31.6%
12.90% 22.20%36.8%
15.80%12.60%
5.3%8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 5n=135
Team 5.3n=19
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%14.00% 16.70%
18.70%24.40%
8.30%
21.40%30.20%
8.30%
15.40%7.00%
25.00%
13.80% 12.80%
33.30%
11.60% 11.60% 8.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 5n=86
Team 5.3n=12
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.30% 13.8%
22.20%
14.30%15.4%
18.40%
19.40% 24.6%
12.90%
9.20% 6.2%
15.80%
29.60% 26.2%
8.10% 10.20% 13.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 6n=98
Team 6.1n=65
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 16.00% 14.60%
18.70%20.00%
17.00%
21.40% 24.00%26.80%
15.40% 10.00% 9.80%
13.80%16.00% 17.10%
11.60% 14.00% 14.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 6n=50
Team 6.1n=41
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 6.2
22.70%17.30%
24.2%
22.20%
14.30%
12.1%
18.40%
19.40% 9.1%
12.90%
9.20%15.2%
15.80%
29.60%36.4%
8.10% 10.20%3.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 6n=98
Team 6.2n=33
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 16.00%22.20%
18.70%20.00%
33.30%
21.40% 24.00%
11.10%
15.40% 10.00%
11.10%
13.80%16.00%
11.10%
11.60% 14.00% 11.10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 6n=50
Team 6.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
10.40%
22.20%
29.20%
18.40%22.90%
12.90%8.30%
15.80%
14.60%
8.10%14.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 7
n=48
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
7.70%
18.70%
11.50%
21.40%
15.40%
15.40%
30.80%
13.80%
19.20%
11.60% 15.40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 7
n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%29.70%
37.5%
22.20% 10.80%
37.5%18.40% 29.70%
12.90%8.10%
12.5%15.80%
16.20%
8.10% 5.40%12.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 8n=37
Team 8.1n=8
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
22.70%29.70%
16.7%
22.20% 10.80%
18.40% 29.70%
58.3%
12.90%8.10%
16.7%15.80%16.20%
8.3%8.10% 5.40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 8n=37
Team 8.2n=12
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
54.50%50.00%
18.70%
13.60% 25.00%
21.40%
4.50%
8.30%
15.40%
4.50%
13.80% 9.10%
8.30%
11.60% 13.60%8.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 8n=22
Team 8.2n=12
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%29.70%
35.30%
22.20% 10.80%5.90%
18.40% 29.70%23.50%
12.90%8.10%
15.80%16.20%
29.40%
8.10% 5.40% 5.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 8n=37
Team 8.3n=17
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
54.50%
71.40%
18.70%
13.60%
21.40%
4.50%15.40%
4.50%14.30%
13.80% 9.10%
14.30%11.60% 13.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 8n=22
Team 8.3n=7
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
10.40%14.8%
22.20%
20.90%16.70%
18.40%
18.70%24.1%
12.90%
12.70%
18.50%
15.80%
29.10%
22.2%
8.10% 8.20%3.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 9n=134
Team 9.1n=54
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%12.90%
18.20%
18.70%
17.60%
24.20%
21.40%
24.70%
18.20%
15.40%
11.80%9.10%
13.80%22.40%
30.30%
11.60% 10.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 9n=85
Team 9.1n=33
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 9.2
22.70%
10.40% 7.5%
22.20%
20.90% 23.80%
18.40%
18.70% 15.0%
12.90%
12.70%
8.80%
15.80%
29.10%
33.8%
8.10% 8.20% 11.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 9n=134
Team 9.2n=80
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%12.90% 9.60%
18.70%
17.60%
13.50%
21.40%
24.70%
28.80%
15.40%
11.80%13.50%
13.80%22.40%
17.30%
11.60% 10.60%17.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 9n=85
Team 9.2n=52
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 21.70% 23.3%
22.20% 21.70%14.00%
18.40%
10.80%
11.6%
12.90%
18.10%20.90%
15.80%16.90% 23.3%
8.10% 10.80% 7.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 10n=83
Team 10.1n=43
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
5.60%11.50%
18.70%
3.70%
7.70%
21.40%
31.50%19.20%
15.40%
35.20%34.60%
13.80% 14.80%15.40%
11.60% 9.30% 11.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 10n=54
Team 10.1n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 21.70%13.8%
22.20% 21.70% 37.90%
18.40%
10.80%
10.3%
12.90%
18.10% 3.40%
15.80%16.90%
13.8%
8.10% 10.80%20.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 10n=83
Team 10.2n=29
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
5.60%
18.70%
3.70%
21.40%
31.50%
36.80%
15.40%
35.20%36.80%
13.80% 14.80% 15.80%
11.60% 9.30% 10.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 10n=54
Team 10.2n=19
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 21.70%
36.4%
22.20% 21.70%
9.10%
18.40%
10.80% 9.1%
12.90%
18.10%
45.50%
15.80%16.90%
8.10% 10.80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 10n=83
Team 10.3n=11
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
5.60%
18.70%
3.70%
21.40%
31.50%55.60%
15.40%
35.20%
33.30%
13.80% 14.80%
11.10%11.60% 9.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 10n=54
Team 10.3n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00% 21.4%
22.20%23.50%
50.00%
18.40%18.40%
14.3%
12.90%15.40%
10.70%
15.80%11.80%
8.10% 5.90% 3.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.1n=28
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20%22.50%
18.70%18.10%
22.50%
21.40% 25.90%
22.50%
15.40%17.20%
12.50%
13.80% 7.80%12.50%
11.60% 13.80%7.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.1n=40
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00%
40.9%
22.20%23.50%
18.20%18.40%
18.40%
22.7%12.90%15.40%
4.50%15.80%11.80% 4.5%
8.10% 5.90% 9.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.2n=22
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20%
18.70%18.10%
25.00%
21.40% 25.90%
25.00%
15.40%17.20%
13.80% 7.80%
50.00%
11.60% 13.80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.2n=4
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00%29.4%
22.20%23.50%
29.40%
18.40%18.40%
23.5%12.90%15.40%
5.90%15.80%11.80%
5.9%8.10% 5.90% 5.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.3n=17
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20%
18.70%18.10%
23.10%
21.40% 25.90% 53.80%
15.40%17.20%
15.40%13.80% 7.80%
11.60% 13.80%7.70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.3n=13
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00%20.3%
22.20%23.50%
13.00%
18.40%18.40%
17.4%
12.90%15.40%
23.20%
15.80%11.80%
20.3%
8.10% 5.90% 5.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.4n=69
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20% 18.60%
18.70%18.10% 13.60%
21.40% 25.90%22.00%
15.40%17.20%
22.00%
13.80% 7.80%3.40%
11.60% 13.80%20.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.4n=59
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
37.80%
22.2%
22.20%
28.90%
33.30%
18.40%
15.60%
111.0%
12.90%
2.20%15.80%
9.60%11.1%
8.10% 5.90%22.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 12n=135
Team 12.1n=9
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
30.10%
18.70%
23.30%
21.40%
27.40%
100.00%
15.40%
8.20%13.80%
5.50%11.60%
5.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 12n=73
Team 12.1n=2
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
37.80%
54.20%
22.20%
28.90%
20.80%
18.40%
15.60%
12.5%
12.90%
2.20%15.80%
9.60%8.30%
8.10% 5.90% 4.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 12n=135
Team 12.2n=24
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
30.10%
66.7%18.70%
23.30%
33.30%
21.40%
27.40%15.40%
8.20%13.80%
5.50%11.60%
5.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 12n=73
Team 12.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
37.80% 35.30%
22.20%
28.90% 30.40%18.40%
15.60% 16.7%12.90%
2.20% 2.90%15.80%9.60% 9.8%
8.10% 5.90% 4.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 12n=135
Team 12.3n=102
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
30.10%25.8%
18.70%
23.30%22.60%
21.40%
27.40%29.00%
15.40%
8.20%9.70%13.80%
5.50% 6.50%11.60%
5.50% 6.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 12n=73
Team 12.3n=62
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
19.10%
54.50%
33.30%
18.70%
13.60%
21.40%
4.50%15.40%
4.50%
13.80% 9.10%
11.60% 13.60%
66.70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 8n=22
Team 8.1n=3
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
FY 2017Average Months - Team 15.0
Average Months - District 16.6Average Months - State 17.6
The data represent the amount of time between the date the petition is filed to the date the case is terminated in JUSTICE for all cases termi-nated in state fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18.
Time to Case Termination6
The data represent the amount of time between the date the petition is filed to the date the case is terminated in JUS-TICE for all cases terminated in state fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18.
FY 2017 July 1, 2016-June 30, 2017: State, District/Team Comparisons
17The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Child Welfare | JUSTICE Data, continued
Time to Case Termination Team 1
Time to Case Termination Team 4
Time to Case Termination Team 7
Time to Case Termination Team 10.3
Time to Case Termination Team 11.3
Time to Case Termination Team 12.3
41.0% 38.9%
64.5%
19.3% 17.8%
24.2%
15.7%28.9%
11.3%
7.2%
5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=83
FY 2016n=90
FY 2017n=62
56.0%64.5%
36.2%24.2%
7.8% 11.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 1
16.1% 18.6%
57.7%17.1%
18.9%
35.8%
20.5% 13.2%
6.6%
13.7%11.4%
14.7%19.5%
17.8% 18.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=409
FY 2016n=370
FY 2017n=106
56.0% 57.7%
36.2% 35.8%
7.8% 6.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 4
16.9% 18.2%
44.4%
23.4% 21.8%
55.6%
23.4%18.2%
11.7% 23.6%
9.1%
12.7%15.6%
5.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=77
FY 2016n=55
FY 2017n=9
56.0%44.4%
36.2% 55.6%
7.8%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 7
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
56.0%64.0%
50%
36.2%28.0%
50%
7.8% 8.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 10 Team 10.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2015n=35
FY 2016n=28
FY 2017n=28
Chart Title
56.0%48.6%
9.1%
36.2%41.9%
45.5%
7.8% 9.5%
45.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 11 Team 11.3
22.6%
37.2%
58.8%14.5%
33.7%
33.3%
4.8%
3.5%
7.8%
9.7%
12.8%
12.9%
11.6%
35.5%
1.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=62
FY 2016n=86
FY 2017n=51
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
State District 12 Team 12.3
1096 days and up over 3 years
731-1095 days within 3 years
545-730 days within 2 years
366-545 days within 18 months
181-365 days within 1 year
0-180 days within 6 months
37.5%
18.2%
50.0%
50.0%
18.2%
12.5%
12.5%
37.5%
18.2%
18.2%
27.3%
42.9%
14.3%9.1%
45.5%46.4%
25.7%
14.3%
10.7%
45.5%14.3%
7.1%
7.1%8.6%
5.7%2.9%
7.8%
36.2%
56.0%63.6% 58.8%
33.3%30.3%
6.1% 7.8%
CW Case Termination - Team 1
CW Case Termination - Team 5.2
CW Case Termination - Team 12.2
CW Case Termination - Team 11.2
CW Case Termination - Team 11.3
CW Case Termination - Team 5.3
CW Case Termination - Team 11.1
CW Case Termination - Team 11.4
CW Case Termination - Team 6.1
CW Case Termination - Team 10.1
CW Case Termination - Team 8.3
CW Case Termination - Team 8.2
CW Case Termination - Team 8.1
CW Case Termination - Team 2.1 CW Case Termination - Team 7CW Case Termination - Team 5.1
CW Case Termination - Team 12.1
CW Case Termination - Team 10.2
CW Case Termination - Team 10.3
CW Case Termination - Team 9.1
Lincoln
CW Case Termination - Team 12.3
22.70%
47.13%
22.20%
26.44%
18.40%
12.64%
12.90%
2.30%15.80%
8.05%8.10%
3.45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 1
n=87
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
34.80%
18.70%
19.70%21.40%
22.70%15.40%
7.60%13.80%1.50%
11.60% 13.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 1
n=66
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26,2018
1096 thru highest - over 3 years
731 thru 1095- up to 3 years
546 thru 730 days - up to 2 years
366-545 days - up to 18 months
181-365 days - up to 1 year
0-180 days - up to 6 months
22.70%16.70%
22.20% 30.20%
50.0%
18.40%21.90% 16.7%
12.90%10.40% 16.7%
15.80%15.60%
16.7%8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 2n=96
Team 2.1n=6
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%13.50% 16.70%
18.70% 30.80%
50.00%
21.40%
21.20%
15.40%
19.20% 16.70%
13.80%3.80%
16.70%11.60% 11.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
Districtn=52
Team 2.1n=6
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 2.2
22.70%16.70%
9.1%
22.20% 30.20%36.4%
18.40%21.90%
45.5%12.90%10.40%
9.1%
15.80%15.60%
8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 2n=96
Team 2.2n=11
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%13.50% 0.00%
No …
18.70% 30.80%
21.40%
21.20%
15.40%
19.20%
13.80%3.80%
11.60% 11.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 2n=52
Team 2.2n=0
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 2.3
22.70%16.70% 19.0%
22.20% 30.20% 27.8%
18.40%21.90% 19.0%
12.90%10.40%
10.1%
15.80%15.60%
17.7%
8.10% 5.20% 6.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 2n=96
Team 2.3n=79
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%13.50% 13.00%
18.70% 30.80% 28.30%
21.40%
21.20% 23.90%
15.40%
19.20% 19.60%
13.80%3.80% 2.20%
11.60% 11.50% 13.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 2n=52
Team 2.3n=46
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 3
22.70% 26.30%
22.20%20.10%
18.40% 14.30%
12.90%12.50%
15.80%16.50%
8.10% 10.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 3n=224
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 22.50%
18.70%20.00%
21.40% 15.80%
15.40% 17.50%
13.80% 15.00%
11.60% 9.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 3n=120
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 4
22.70% 19.00%
22.20%
18.30%
18.40%23.10%
12.90% 16.70%
15.80% 13.60%
8.10% 9.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 4n=389
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.60%
18.70%16.90%
21.40%
15.70%
15.40%
17.20%
13.80%19.90%
11.60% 12.70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 4n=267
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.80%
23.1%
22.20% 28.10% 19.2%
18.40% 14.10%15.4%
12.90% 22.20%
15.4%
15.80%12.60% 26.9%
8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 5n=135
Team 5.1n=26
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%14.00%
26.70%
18.70%24.40%
40.00%21.40%30.20%
13.30%
15.40%
7.00%
13.80% 12.80% 6.70%
11.60% 11.60% 13.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 5n=86
Team 5.1n=15
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.80% 17.8%
22.20% 28.10%33.3%
18.40% 14.10%10.0%
12.90% 22.20% 21.1%
15.80%12.60% 11.1%
8.10% 5.20% 6.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 5n=135
Team 5.2n=90
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%14.00% 10.20%
18.70%24.40%
23.70%
21.40%30.20% 39.00%
15.40%
7.00%5.10%
13.80% 12.80% 10.20%
11.60% 11.60% 11.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 5n=86
Team 5.2n=59
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.80%
10.5%
22.20% 28.10%
15.8%
18.40% 14.10%
31.6%
12.90% 22.20%36.8%
15.80%12.60%
5.3%8.10% 5.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 5n=135
Team 5.3n=19
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%14.00% 16.70%
18.70%24.40%
8.30%
21.40%30.20%
8.30%
15.40%7.00%
25.00%
13.80% 12.80%
33.30%
11.60% 11.60% 8.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 5n=86
Team 5.3n=12
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%17.30% 13.8%
22.20%
14.30%15.4%
18.40%
19.40% 24.6%
12.90%
9.20% 6.2%
15.80%
29.60% 26.2%
8.10% 10.20% 13.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 6n=98
Team 6.1n=65
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 16.00% 14.60%
18.70%20.00%
17.00%
21.40% 24.00%26.80%
15.40% 10.00% 9.80%
13.80%16.00% 17.10%
11.60% 14.00% 14.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 6n=50
Team 6.1n=41
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 6.2
22.70%17.30%
24.2%
22.20%
14.30%
12.1%
18.40%
19.40% 9.1%
12.90%
9.20%15.2%
15.80%
29.60%36.4%
8.10% 10.20%3.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 6n=98
Team 6.2n=33
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 16.00%22.20%
18.70%20.00%
33.30%
21.40% 24.00%
11.10%
15.40% 10.00%
11.10%
13.80%16.00%
11.10%
11.60% 14.00% 11.10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 6n=50
Team 6.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
10.40%
22.20%
29.20%
18.40%22.90%
12.90%8.30%
15.80%
14.60%
8.10%14.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District/Team 7
n=48
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
7.70%
18.70%
11.50%
21.40%
15.40%
15.40%
30.80%
13.80%
19.20%
11.60% 15.40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District/Team 7
n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%29.70%
37.5%
22.20% 10.80%
37.5%18.40% 29.70%
12.90%8.10%
12.5%15.80%
16.20%
8.10% 5.40%12.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 8n=37
Team 8.1n=8
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
22.70%29.70%
16.7%
22.20% 10.80%
18.40% 29.70%
58.3%
12.90%8.10%
16.7%15.80%16.20%
8.3%8.10% 5.40%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 8n=37
Team 8.2n=12
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
54.50%50.00%
18.70%
13.60% 25.00%
21.40%
4.50%
8.30%
15.40%
4.50%
13.80% 9.10%
8.30%
11.60% 13.60%8.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 8n=22
Team 8.2n=12
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%29.70%
35.30%
22.20% 10.80%5.90%
18.40% 29.70%23.50%
12.90%8.10%
15.80%16.20%
29.40%
8.10% 5.40% 5.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 8n=37
Team 8.3n=17
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
54.50%
71.40%
18.70%
13.60%
21.40%
4.50%15.40%
4.50%14.30%
13.80% 9.10%
14.30%11.60% 13.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 8n=22
Team 8.3n=7
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
10.40%14.8%
22.20%
20.90%16.70%
18.40%
18.70%24.1%
12.90%
12.70%
18.50%
15.80%
29.10%
22.2%
8.10% 8.20%3.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 9n=134
Team 9.1n=54
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%12.90%
18.20%
18.70%
17.60%
24.20%
21.40%
24.70%
18.20%
15.40%
11.80%9.10%
13.80%22.40%
30.30%
11.60% 10.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 9n=85
Team 9.1n=33
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
CW Case Termination - Team 9.2
22.70%
10.40% 7.5%
22.20%
20.90% 23.80%
18.40%
18.70% 15.0%
12.90%
12.70%
8.80%
15.80%
29.10%
33.8%
8.10% 8.20% 11.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 9n=134
Team 9.2n=80
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%12.90% 9.60%
18.70%
17.60%
13.50%
21.40%
24.70%
28.80%
15.40%
11.80%13.50%
13.80%22.40%
17.30%
11.60% 10.60%17.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 9n=85
Team 9.2n=52
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 21.70% 23.3%
22.20% 21.70%14.00%
18.40%
10.80%
11.6%
12.90%
18.10%20.90%
15.80%16.90% 23.3%
8.10% 10.80% 7.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 10n=83
Team 10.1n=43
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
5.60%11.50%
18.70%
3.70%
7.70%
21.40%
31.50%19.20%
15.40%
35.20%34.60%
13.80% 14.80%15.40%
11.60% 9.30% 11.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 10n=54
Team 10.1n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 21.70%13.8%
22.20% 21.70% 37.90%
18.40%
10.80%
10.3%
12.90%
18.10% 3.40%
15.80%16.90%
13.8%
8.10% 10.80%20.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 10n=83
Team 10.2n=29
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
5.60%
18.70%
3.70%
21.40%
31.50%
36.80%
15.40%
35.20%36.80%
13.80% 14.80% 15.80%
11.60% 9.30% 10.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 10n=54
Team 10.2n=19
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 21.70%
36.4%
22.20% 21.70%
9.10%
18.40%
10.80% 9.1%
12.90%
18.10%
45.50%
15.80%16.90%
8.10% 10.80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 10n=83
Team 10.3n=11
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
5.60%
18.70%
3.70%
21.40%
31.50%55.60%
15.40%
35.20%
33.30%
13.80% 14.80%
11.10%11.60% 9.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 10n=54
Team 10.3n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00% 21.4%
22.20%23.50%
50.00%
18.40%18.40%
14.3%
12.90%15.40%
10.70%
15.80%11.80%
8.10% 5.90% 3.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.1n=28
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20%22.50%
18.70%18.10%
22.50%
21.40% 25.90%
22.50%
15.40%17.20%
12.50%
13.80% 7.80%12.50%
11.60% 13.80%7.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.1n=40
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00%
40.9%
22.20%23.50%
18.20%18.40%
18.40%
22.7%12.90%15.40%
4.50%15.80%11.80% 4.5%
8.10% 5.90% 9.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.2n=22
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20%
18.70%18.10%
25.00%
21.40% 25.90%
25.00%
15.40%17.20%
13.80% 7.80%
50.00%
11.60% 13.80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.2n=4
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00%29.4%
22.20%23.50%
29.40%
18.40%18.40%
23.5%12.90%15.40%
5.90%15.80%11.80%
5.9%8.10% 5.90% 5.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.3n=17
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20%
18.70%18.10%
23.10%
21.40% 25.90% 53.80%
15.40%17.20%
15.40%13.80% 7.80%
11.60% 13.80%7.70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.3n=13
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70% 25.00%20.3%
22.20%23.50%
13.00%
18.40%18.40%
17.4%
12.90%15.40%
23.20%
15.80%11.80%
20.3%
8.10% 5.90% 5.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,602
District 11n=136
Team 11.4n=69
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10% 17.20% 18.60%
18.70%18.10% 13.60%
21.40% 25.90%22.00%
15.40%17.20%
22.00%
13.80% 7.80%3.40%
11.60% 13.80%20.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 11n=116
Team 11.4n=59
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
37.80%
22.2%
22.20%
28.90%
33.30%
18.40%
15.60%
111.0%
12.90%
2.20%15.80%
9.60%11.1%
8.10% 5.90%22.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 12n=135
Team 12.1n=9
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
30.10%
18.70%
23.30%
21.40%
27.40%
100.00%
15.40%
8.20%13.80%
5.50%11.60%
5.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 12n=73
Team 12.1n=2
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
37.80%
54.20%
22.20%
28.90%
20.80%
18.40%
15.60%
12.5%
12.90%
2.20%15.80%
9.60%8.30%
8.10% 5.90% 4.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 12n=135
Team 12.2n=24
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
30.10%
66.7%18.70%
23.30%
33.30%
21.40%
27.40%15.40%
8.20%13.80%
5.50%11.60%
5.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 12n=73
Team 12.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
22.70%
37.80% 35.30%
22.20%
28.90% 30.40%18.40%
15.60% 16.7%12.90%
2.20% 2.90%15.80%9.60% 9.8%
8.10% 5.90% 4.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,602
District 12n=135
Team 12.3n=102
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
19.10%
30.10%25.8%
18.70%
23.30%22.60%
21.40%
27.40%29.00%
15.40%
8.20%9.70%13.80%
5.50% 6.50%11.60%
5.50% 6.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,017
District 12n=73
Team 12.3n=62
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
19.10%
54.50%
33.30%
18.70%
13.60%
21.40%
4.50%15.40%
4.50%
13.80% 9.10%
11.60% 13.60%
66.70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,017
District 8n=22
Team 8.1n=3
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
FY 2018Average Months - Team 37.6
Average Months - District 15.2Average Months - State 19.6
Time to Case Termination6
FY 2018 July 1, 2017-February 26, 2018: State, District/Team Comparisons
18 2016-2017 Data Reports
Entry into the Juvenile Justice System
Arrests by Team - Team 1
Arrests by Team - Team 5.3
Arrests by Team - Team 5.2
Arrests by Team - Team 12.2
Arrests by Team - Team 11.2
Arrests by Team - Team 11.3
Arrests by Team - Team 5.1
Arrests by Team - Team 11.1
Arrests by Team - Team 11.4
Arrests by Team - District 6
Arrests by Team - District 10
Arrests by Team - Team 8.3
Arrests by Team - Team 8.2
Arrests by Team - Team 8.1
Arrests by Team - District 2 Arrests by Team - Team 7
Arrests by Team - District 5
Arrests by Team - Team 12.1
Arrests by Team - Team 10.2
Arrests by Team - Team 10.3
Arrests by Team - District 9
49%
15%
18%
13%5%
0%
n=244
Gage
Richardson
Saline
Jefferson
Nemaha Pawnee
3%
6%
91%
n=1065
CassOtoe
Sarpy
n=81
28%
62%
10%Seward
York
Hamilton
n=471
n=384
33%
67%
n=6
Polk
Merrick
n=440
n=353
Arrests by Team - District 8
n=89
Box Butte
Cherry
Holt
ValleyBrown
Custer
Howard
Sherman
n=10
n=38
84%
13%
3%
Holt
Valley Brown
n=22
77%
5%
18%
Custer
Howard
Sherman
n=873
62%
38%
Hall
Buffalo
n=253
n=29
59%
3%
38%
PhelpsHarlan
Kearney
n=14
50%50%FillmoreNuckolls
n=287
99%
1%
Dawson
Gosper
Arrests by Team - District 11n=669
n=47
n=83
99%
1%
0%
n=252
Lincoln
Frontier
Hooker
Arrests by Team - District 12
n=655%
37%
58%
Sheridan
Morrill
Dawes
n=22
73%
27%
Cheyenne
Kimball
Polk
Seward
5%10% 2%
12%
63%
3%
4%0%
1%
YorkHamilton
Saunders
Platte
Butler
Colfax
Merrick
14%
77%
4% 5%Saunders
Platte
Butler
Colfax
55%
1%
11%
2%
2%
29%
Dodge
Cedar
Washington
Burt
Dixon
Dakota
81%
2%
2%
1%
0%
14%
Madison
Cuming
Antelope
Wayne
Pierce
Stanton
42%
1%
6% 1%
1%
0%
2%
10%0%
37%
Dawson
Gosper
Keith
Chase
Perkins
Dundy
FurnasRed Willow
Hitchcock
83%
7%
0% 4%3%3%
Adams
Phelps
HarlanKearney
Fillmore Nuckolls
83%
9%
6%
2%
Keith
Chase
PerkinsDundy
18%
81%
1%
Furnas
Red Willow
Hitchcock
n=3221%
7%
12%
5%2%
73%
0%
SheridanMorrill
Dawes
CheyenneKimball
Scotts Bluff
Banner
10%
Brown
Cherry
10%
90%
Team County Arrests8.1 Brown 18.1 Cherry 9
Total 10
Arrests by Team - Team 1
Arrests by Team - Team 5.3
Arrests by Team - Team 5.2
Arrests by Team - Team 12.2
Arrests by Team - Team 11.2
Arrests by Team - Team 11.3
Arrests by Team - Team 5.1
Arrests by Team - Team 11.1
Arrests by Team - Team 11.4
Arrests by Team - District 6
Arrests by Team - District 10
Arrests by Team - Team 8.3
Arrests by Team - Team 8.2
Arrests by Team - Team 8.1
Arrests by Team - District 2 Arrests by Team - Team 7
Arrests by Team - District 5
Arrests by Team - Team 12.1
Arrests by Team - Team 10.2
Arrests by Team - Team 10.3
Arrests by Team - District 9
49%
15%
18%
13%5%
0%
n=244
Gage
Richardson
Saline
Jefferson
Nemaha Pawnee
3%
6%
91%
n=1065
CassOtoe
Sarpy
n=81
28%
62%
10%Seward
York
Hamilton
n=471
n=384
33%
67%
n=6
Polk
Merrick
n=440
n=353
Arrests by Team - District 8
n=89
Box Butte
Cherry
Holt
ValleyBrown
Custer
Howard
Sherman
n=10
n=38
84%
13%
3%
Holt
Valley Brown
n=22
77%
5%
18%
Custer
Howard
Sherman
n=873
62%
38%
Hall
Buffalo
n=253
n=29
59%
3%
38%
PhelpsHarlan
Kearney
n=14
50%50%FillmoreNuckolls
n=287
99%
1%
Dawson
Gosper
Arrests by Team - District 11n=669
n=47
n=83
99%
1%
0%
n=252
Lincoln
Frontier
Hooker
Arrests by Team - District 12
n=655%
37%
58%
Sheridan
Morrill
Dawes
n=22
73%
27%
Cheyenne
Kimball
Polk
Seward
5%10% 2%
12%
63%
3%
4%0%
1%
YorkHamilton
Saunders
Platte
Butler
Colfax
Merrick
14%
77%
4% 5%Saunders
Platte
Butler
Colfax
55%
1%
11%
2%
2%
29%
Dodge
Cedar
Washington
Burt
Dixon
Dakota
81%
2%
2%
1%
0%
14%
Madison
Cuming
Antelope
Wayne
Pierce
Stanton
42%
1%
6% 1%
1%
0%
2%
10%0%
37%
Dawson
Gosper
Keith
Chase
Perkins
Dundy
FurnasRed Willow
Hitchcock
83%
7%
0% 4%3%3%
Adams
Phelps
HarlanKearney
Fillmore Nuckolls
83%
9%
6%
2%
Keith
Chase
PerkinsDundy
18%
81%
1%
Furnas
Red Willow
Hitchcock
n=3221%
7%
12%
5%2%
73%
0%
SheridanMorrill
Dawes
CheyenneKimball
Scotts Bluff
Banner
10%
Brown
Cherry
10%
90%
Although the two primary child-serving entities perform different functions, they have the same objective: improving the lives of youth. The child welfare system responds to well-being, abuse, neglect, and permanency concerns. On the other hand, the juvenile justice system focuses on youth accountability and community safety by utilizing targeted case management and services that seek sustained behavioral change. In Nebraska, the juvenile justice system supervises not only those youth who were found responsible for a delinquent act, but also status youth or those who have participated in behaviors that are prohibited by law due to their status as a juvenile. The ultimate goal in juvenile justice is to prevent youth from returning to the system or becoming involved in the adult criminal justice system (recidivism) while also en-suring the juvenile does not pose a threat to the community.
Number of Arrests9
The chart and table reflect the number of arrests of youth 17 and under per 100 youths, aged 10-17 in 2016. If team/county is not listed they did not have ny youth arrests.
19The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Entry into the Juvenile Justice System, continued
Team Youth on Diversion % Youth in Diversion1 168 4.2%
2.1 54 1.4%2.2 30 0.8%2.3 466 11.8%3 555 14.0%4 790 19.9%
5.1 56 1.4%5.2 209 5.3%5.3 54 1.4%6.1 63 1.6%6.2 112 2.8%7 243 6.1%
8.1 25 0.6%8.2 19 0.5%8.3 43 1.1%9.1 273 6.9%9.2 298 7.5%10.1 101 2.5%10.2 19 0.5%10.3 18 0.5%11.1 53 1.3%11.2 22 0.6%11.3 26 0.7%11.4 77 1.9%12.1 32 0.8%12.2 47 1.2%12.3 73 1.8%
Youth Referred to Diversion Programs10
Youth charged with minor offenses may have the chance to participate in voluntary diversion programs. Juvenile diver-sion programs allow youths who commit offenses to be directed away from more formal juvenile justice system involve-ment. This chart demonstrates the use of diversion program across Nebraska in 2016. For county level information, please reference the "Kids Count" report produced by Voices for Children in Nebraska.
20 2016-2017 Data Reports
Siou
xD
awes
Sher
idan
Box
Butt
e
Scot
ts B
lu�
Bann
er
Mor
rill
Chey
enne
Ki
mba
ll
Gar
den
Deu
el
Gra
nt
Art
hur
Keith
Linc
oln
Fron
tier
Red
Will
ow
Furn
as
Gos
per
Daw
son
Cust
er
Blai
neLo
upG
ar�e
ld
How
ard
Bu�a
lo Kear
ney
Adam
s
Web
ster
Nuc
kolls
Thay
erJe
�ers
on
Gag
e
Paw
nee
Rich
rdso
n
Nem
aha
John
son
Oto
e
Sarp
y
Dou
glas
Was
hing
ton
Burt
Thur
ston
Dak
ota
Dix
on
Ceda
rKn
oxH
oltBo
ydKe
ya P
aha
Brow
n
Cher
ry
Rock
Ant
elop
ePi
erce
Way
ne
Cum
ing
Stan
ton
Mad
ison
Cass
Salin
eFi
llmor
eCl
ay
Ham
ilton
Mer
rick
Nan
ce
Plat
teCo
lfax
Dod
ge
Saun
ders
Butle
r
Polk
Lanc
aste
r
Boon
e
York
Sew
ard
Fran
klin
Har
lan
Phel
ps
Hal
l
Sher
man
Valle
y
Whe
eler
Gre
eley
Loga
n
Thom
as
Hoo
ker
McP
hers
on
Perk
ins
Chas
eH
ayes
Hitc
hcoc
kD
undy
Juve
nile
Div
ersio
n Pr
ogra
m R
epor
ted
Entry into the Juvenile Justice System, continued
Map of Formal Diversion Programs in Nebraska | 201611
21The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Detention Team 1
21%
8%
21%19%
31%Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=62
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 2.1
9%
61%
4%
26%Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=23
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 2.2
10%
52%5%
19%
14%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=21
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 2.3
6%
62%
6%
16%
7% 3%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=340
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 3
83%
2% 0% 7%7%
1%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=252
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention State of Nebraska
41%
16%8%
17%
17%
1%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=3084
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 4
50%
4%5%
19%
22%
0%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=1527
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 5.1
41%
28%
3%
15%
5%8%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=39
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 5.2
18%
35%10%
18%
18%
1%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=116
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 5.3
20%
18%
18%
21%
23%Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=34
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 6.1
16%
30%
21%
22%
7%4%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=81
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 6.2
3%
44%
11%5%
20%
20%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=91
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 7
41%
27%
3%
11%
18%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=63
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 8.1
67%7%
13%
13%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=15
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 8.2
29%
29%
18%
18%
6%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=17
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 8.3
67%
33% Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=6
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 9.1
28%
25%18%
21%
8%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=127
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 9.2
25%
24%22%
5%
13%
11%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=55
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 10.1
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=56
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
27%
12%11%
23%
27%
Detention Team 10.2
41%
6%
47%
6%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=17
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 10.3
50%50%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=2
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
39%
13%
26%
22%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=23
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 11.1
Detention Team 11.2
100%
50%50%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=4
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 11.3
43%
21%
36% Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=14
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 11.4
40%
4%24%
20%
12%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=25
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 12.1
48%
40%
8%4%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=25
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 12.2
50%50%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=2
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 12.3
32%
13%19%
15%
10%
11%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=47
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Entry into the Juvenile Justice System, continued
Team
State
Detention Team 1
21%
8%
21%19%
31%Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=62
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 2.1
9%
61%
4%
26%Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=23
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 2.2
10%
52%5%
19%
14%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=21
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 2.3
6%
62%
6%
16%
7% 3%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=340
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 3
83%
2% 0% 7%7%
1%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=252
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention State of Nebraska
41%
16%8%
17%
17%
1%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=3084
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 4
50%
4%5%
19%
22%
0%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=1527
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 5.1
41%
28%
3%
15%
5%8%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=39
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 5.2
18%
35%10%
18%
18%
1%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=116
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 5.3
20%
18%
18%
21%
23%Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=34
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 6.1
16%
30%
21%
22%
7%4%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=81
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 6.2
3%
44%
11%5%
20%
20%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=91
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 7
41%
27%
3%
11%
18%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=63
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 8.1
67%7%
13%
13%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=15
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 8.2
29%
29%
18%
18%
6%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=17
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 8.3
67%
33% Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=6
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 9.1
28%
25%18%
21%
8%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=127
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 9.2
25%
24%22%
5%
13%
11%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=55
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 10.1
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=56
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
27%
12%11%
23%
27%
Detention Team 10.2
41%
6%
47%
6%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=17
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 10.3
50%50%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=2
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
39%
13%
26%
22%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=23
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 11.1
Detention Team 11.2
100%
50%50%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=4
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 11.3
43%
21%
36% Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=14
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 11.4
40%
4%24%
20%
12%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=25
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 12.1
48%
40%
8%4%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=25
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 12.2
50%50%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=2
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention Team 12.3
32%
13%19%
15%
10%
11%
Secure Detention
Staff Secure Detention
Shelter Care
n=47
Parent or Other Adult
Released without Restrictions
Other
Detention12
A young person is screened with the Risk Assessment Instrument (RAI) if they come into contact with law enforcement and the officer believes the youth may need to be detained. The RAI tool is designed to assess the risk to re-offend,/po-tential community safety concerns, and the risk of flight from the court’s jurisdiction. The tool is designed to aid proba-tion intake officers in the decision to detain youth. The RAI will provide the officer with an intake decision.The officer may use discretion to determine if the intake decision will be utilized, or should be overridden to a higher or lower level of supervision. The graphs show the final intake decision made by officers during the 2016-17 fiscal year, and the per-cent of overrides to lower and higher levels of supervision.
22 2016-2017 Data Reports
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 6.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 6.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 9.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 9.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.4
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.3Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.3Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 7
Court Petitions Filed - Team 1 Court Petitions Filed - District 4
67%
10%
20%
3%N=5778
Court Petitions Filed - State of NE
65%7%
27%
1%N=305
72%
3%
25%
N=79
71%
7%
22%
N=86
70%
9%
21%
N=391
57%
7%
36%
N=595
60%13%
26%
1%N=1,430
74%
11%
12%3%
N=137
68%4%
13%
15%
N=306
76%
8%
14%
2%N=62
67%
14%
19%
N=117
81%
11%
7%
1%n=150
77%
7%
16%
N=242
75%
16%
9%
N=32
64%
23%
13%
N=61
58%
16%
16%
10%
N=31
79%
9%
12%
N=467
65%
23%
12%
N=90
60%
6%
13%
21%
N=212
65%9%
11%
15%
N=80
54%
10%
13%
23%
N=39
78%
12%
10%
N=180
75%
8%
5%
12%
N=59
71%
8%
19%
2%N=62
61%14%
21%
4%
N=169
79%
7%
12%
2%N=106
85%
5%
10%
N=60
72%
8%
20%
N=230
Misdemeanor
Felony
Status Offender/Truancy
Traffic Offense
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 6.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 6.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 9.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 9.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.4
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.3Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.3Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 7
Court Petitions Filed - Team 1 Court Petitions Filed - District 4
67%
10%
20%
3%N=5778
Court Petitions Filed - State of NE
65%7%
27%
1%N=305
72%
3%
25%
N=79
71%
7%
22%
N=86
70%
9%
21%
N=391
57%
7%
36%
N=595
60%13%
26%
1%N=1,430
74%
11%
12%3%
N=137
68%4%
13%
15%
N=306
76%
8%
14%
2%N=62
67%
14%
19%
N=117
81%
11%
7%
1%n=150
77%
7%
16%
N=242
75%
16%
9%
N=32
64%
23%
13%
N=61
58%
16%
16%
10%
N=31
79%
9%
12%
N=467
65%
23%
12%
N=90
60%
6%
13%
21%
N=212
65%9%
11%
15%
N=80
54%
10%
13%
23%
N=39
78%
12%
10%
N=180
75%
8%
5%
12%
N=59
71%
8%
19%
2%N=62
61%14%
21%
4%
N=169
79%
7%
12%
2%N=106
85%
5%
10%
N=60
72%
8%
20%
N=230
Misdemeanor
Felony
Status Offender/Truancy
Traffic Offense
Entry into the Juvenile Justice System, continued
Team
State
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 2.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 5.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 6.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 6.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 9.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 9.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 10.3
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.4
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 12.3Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.2
Court Petitions Filed - Team 11.3Court Petitions Filed - Team 8.1
Court Petitions Filed - Team 7
Court Petitions Filed - Team 1 Court Petitions Filed - District 4
67%
10%
20%
3%N=5778
Court Petitions Filed - State of NE
65%7%
27%
1%N=305
72%
3%
25%
N=79
71%
7%
22%
N=86
70%
9%
21%
N=391
57%
7%
36%
N=595
60%13%
26%
1%N=1,430
74%
11%
12%3%
N=137
68%4%
13%
15%
N=306
76%
8%
14%
2%N=62
67%
14%
19%
N=117
81%
11%
7%
1%n=150
77%
7%
16%
N=242
75%
16%
9%
N=32
64%
23%
13%
N=61
58%
16%
16%
10%
N=31
79%
9%
12%
N=467
65%
23%
12%
N=90
60%
6%
13%
21%
N=212
65%9%
11%
15%
N=80
54%
10%
13%
23%
N=39
78%
12%
10%
N=180
75%
8%
5%
12%
N=59
71%
8%
19%
2%N=62
61%14%
21%
4%
N=169
79%
7%
12%
2%N=106
85%
5%
10%
N=60
72%
8%
20%
N=230
Misdemeanor
Felony
Status Offender/Truancy
Traffic Offense
Juvenile Court Petitions Filed13
These charts show the subtypes of juvenile justice petitions filed and entered into JUSTICE during state fiscal year 2016-17. The data represent the most serious charge from original filings only and do not include any charges filed as supplemental petitions. Cases that transferred between courts or to adult criminal court are excluded from the analysis.
23The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Juvenile Justice | JUSTICE DataThe Juvenile Justice Case data is also obtained from JUSTICE, this portion of the report also presents an overview of data entered into JUSTICE for fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018. As a reminder, fiscal years run from June 30th to July 1st each year.
Like the child welfare case progression standards, juvenile justice case progression standards have also been updated (see Nebraska Rule § 6-104). The Nebraska CIP team will also include these data upates to the forthcoming dashboard for all TEOC teams. This will be found on our website, estimated time of completion is October 2018.
The data presented in the following section of this report depict the number of juvenile justices cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017 as well as the first half of 2017-2018 data from JUSTICE. Separate analyses were conducted for youth status offenses and youth delinquent acts. To get a measure of case termination for each, a calculation of total days is computed from the date the petition was submitted to the date the case was terminated. At this time, time on diversion is not in Cognos and cannot be included in the analysis. The Nebraska CIP is working with the Cognos’ framework man-agement team to get diversion start and end dates added into Cognos. Additionally, like the child welfare data, this data does not include any youth who was transferred in or out because JUSTICE does not currently track where the youth transferred from or where they transferred. Not knowing all of the information for the youth’s case does not allow for proper data analysis. The Nebraska Court Improvement Project (CIP) is working with JUSTICE developers to better tracking transfer cases. Thus, any case that was closed during the fiscal year is presented in this report. Additionally, the average months for the state, TEOC district, and TEOC team’s case termination is included.
Status Offenses The state of Nebraska had a total of 1,153 status/truancy cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017. The following graph pertaining to status offenses depict the length of time it took your team to terminate status cases, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate these types of cases, and for the state as a whole to terminate their cases. Of these, 22 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 4157) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 499; F(1,1151) = 984, p < .001].
A total of 732 status/truancy cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017. Of these, 2 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 3397) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 419; F(1,730) = 91.5, p < .001]. Delinquent Acts The state of Nebraska had a total of 5,008 delinquency cases terminated in fiscal year 2016-2017, 166 were for traffic of-fenses, 4,224 were for misdemeanors, and 622 were for a felony. The graphs on pages 26-27 depicts the length of time it took your team to terminate delinquency cases, as well as the length of time it took your district to terminate delinquency cases, and for the state as a whole to terminate their delinquency cases. Additionally, it is important to note that 199 of these youth did not have a judge assigned to their case. An analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 3,518) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 508; F(1,5006) = 3102, p < .001].
For the first half of fiscal year 2017-2018, a total of 2,902 delinquency cases were terminated. Of these 2,902 cases, 113 were for traffic offenses, 2,406 were for misdemeanors, and 383 were for a felony. Additionally, 71 of the youth termi-nated this fiscal year did not have a judge assigned to their case, an analysis of variance shows that the youth who did not have a judge assigned to their case had their case open more days (M = 3,435) than youth who had a judge assigned [(M = 366; F(1,2897) = 2719, p < .001].
24 2016-2017 Data Reports
Juvenile Justice System | JUSTICE Data, continued
Time to Case Termination Team 1
Time to Case Termination Team 4
Time to Case Termination Team 7
Time to Case Termination Team 10.3
Time to Case Termination Team 11.3
Time to Case Termination Team 12.3
41.0% 38.9%
64.5%
19.3% 17.8%
24.2%
15.7%28.9%
11.3%
7.2%
5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=83
FY 2016n=90
FY 2017n=62
56.0%64.5%
36.2%24.2%
7.8% 11.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 1
16.1% 18.6%
57.7%17.1%
18.9%
35.8%
20.5% 13.2%
6.6%
13.7%11.4%
14.7%19.5%
17.8% 18.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=409
FY 2016n=370
FY 2017n=106
56.0% 57.7%
36.2% 35.8%
7.8% 6.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 4
16.9% 18.2%
44.4%
23.4% 21.8%
55.6%
23.4%18.2%
11.7% 23.6%
9.1%
12.7%15.6%
5.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=77
FY 2016n=55
FY 2017n=9
56.0%44.4%
36.2% 55.6%
7.8%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 7
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
56.0%64.0%
50%
36.2%28.0%
50%
7.8% 8.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 10 Team 10.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2015n=35
FY 2016n=28
FY 2017n=28
Chart Title
56.0%48.6%
9.1%
36.2%41.9%
45.5%
7.8% 9.5%
45.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 11 Team 11.3
22.6%
37.2%
58.8%14.5%
33.7%
33.3%
4.8%
3.5%
7.8%
9.7%
12.8%
12.9%
11.6%
35.5%
1.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=62
FY 2016n=86
FY 2017n=51
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
State District 12 Team 12.3
1096 days and up over 3 years
731-1095 days within 3 years
545-730 days within 2 years
366-545 days within 18 months
181-365 days within 1 year
0-180 days within 6 months
37.5%
18.2%
50.0%
50.0%
18.2%
12.5%
12.5%
37.5%
18.2%
18.2%
27.3%
42.9%
14.3%9.1%
45.5%46.4%
25.7%
14.3%
10.7%
45.5%14.3%
7.1%
7.1%8.6%
5.7%2.9%
7.8%
36.2%
56.0%63.6% 58.8%
33.3%30.3%
6.1% 7.8%
FY 2017Average Months - Team N/A
Average Months - District 19.7Average Months - State 19.0
JJ Case Termination - Team 1
JJ Case Termination - Team 5.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 12.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 5.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.4
JJ Case Termination - Team 6.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 10.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 8.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 8.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 8.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 2.1 JJ Case Termination - Team 7JJ Case Termination - Team 5.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 12.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 10.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 10.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 9.1
Lincoln
JJ Case Termination - Team 12.3
1096 thru highest - over 3 years
731 thru 1095- up to 3 years
546 thru 730 days - up to 2 years
366-545 days - up to 18 months
181-365 days - up to 1 year
0-180 days - up to 6 months
JJ Case Termination - Team 2.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 2.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 3
JJ Case Termination - Team 4 JJ Case Termination - Team 6.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 9.2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 1
n=52
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26,2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 2n=63
Team 2.1n=8
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 2n=63
Team 2.2n=5
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 2n=63
Team 2.3n=50
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 3n=174
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 4n=263
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 5n=35
Team 5.1n=8
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 5n=45
Team 5.2n=27
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 5n=35
Team 5.3n=6
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 6n=60
Team 6.1n=55
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 6n=29
Team 6.1n=20
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 6n=60
Team 6.2n=5
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 7
n=21
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 8n=11
Team 8.1n=0
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 8n=6
Team 8.2n=4
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 8n=11
Team 8.3n=4
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 9n=57
Team 9.1n=45
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 9n=30
Team 9.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 10n=41
Team 10.1n=20
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 10n=41
Team 10.2n=14
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 10n=18
Team 10.3n=2
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.1n=10
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.2n=2
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.3n=0
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.4n=43
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 12n=107
Team 12.1n=6
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 12n=49
Team 12.2n=5
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 12n=107
Team 12.3n=93
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 1
n=79
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 2n=74
Team 2.1n=18
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 2n=74
Team 2.2n=2
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 2n=74
Team 2.3n=54
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 3n=333
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 5n=45
Team 5.3n=8
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 4n=233
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 5n=45
Team 5.1n=10
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 5n=35
Team 5.2n=21
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 8n=11
Team 8.2n=7
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 8n=6
Team 8.3n=1
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 10n=41
Team 10.3n=7
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 12n=49
Team 12.1n=3
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.4n=24
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 10n=18
Team 10.2n=0
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 8n=6
Team 8.1n=1
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 10n=18
Team 10.1n=16
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.3n=7
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 12n=49
Team 12.3n=41
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.2n=2
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 9n=57
Team 9.2n=12
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 7
n=11
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 6n=29
Team 6.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 9n=30
Team 9.1n=21
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.1n=6
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 12n=107
Team 12.2n=8
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
30.50%
53.80%
29.20%
36.50%14.60%
5.80%
11.10%
1.90%
7.80%
1.90%6.80%
30.50%
44.40%50.00%
29.20%
31.70%
14.60%
12.70%
25.00%
11.10%
4.80%7.80%
4.80%
12.50%
6.80%1.60%
12.50%
30.50%
44.40%
29.20%
31.70%
80.00%
14.60%
12.70%
20.00%
11.10%
4.80%7.80%
4.80%6.80%1.60%
30.50%
44.40% 48.00%
29.20%
31.70%32.00%
14.60%
12.70%10.00%
11.10%
4.80% 6.00%7.80%
4.80% 4.00%6.80%1.60%
30.50%
14.40%
29.20%
23.60%
14.60%
17.80%
11.10%
16.10%
7.80%
14.90%
6.80%13.20%
26.40%33.80%
25.50%
22.40%
15.90%18.30%
9.00%
9.50%11.50%
9.90%11.70%
6.10%
30.50% 28.60%
12.50%
29.20%40%
62.50%
14.60%
20%12.50%11.10%
8.60%7.80%
6.80% 2.90%12.50%
26.40% 26.70% 29.6%
25.50%31.10%
33.3%
15.90%13.30%
14.8%9.00%
15.60%11.1%11.50%
11.10% 11.1%11.70%2.20%
30.50% 28.60%33.30%
29.20%40%
50.00%
14.60%
20%11.10%
8.60% 16.70%7.80%
6.80% 2.90%
26.40%
8.30% 9.1%
25.50%
11.70% 12.7%
15.90%
8.30% 5.5%
9.00%
11.70%7.3%
11.50%
5.00%5.5%
11.70%
55.00%60.0%
30.50%24.10%
30.00%
29.20%
24.10%
25.00%
14.60%
13.80%10.00%
11.10%
10.30% 5.00%
7.80%
20.70% 25.00%
6.80% 6.90% 5.00%
26.40%
8.30%
25.50%
11.70%
15.90%
8.30%40.0%
9.00%
11.70%
60.0%
11.50%
5.00%
11.70%
55.00%
26.40%19.00%
25.50%
28.60%
15.90%14.30%
9.00%9.50%
11.50% 19.00%
11.70% 9.50%
26.40%18.20%
0.0%No Data
25.50%
18.20%
15.90%
18.20%
9.00%
9.10%
11.50%27.30%
11.70% 9.10%
30.50%
50.00%
75.00%
29.20%
16.70%
14.60%
11.10%16.70%
7.80%16.70%
25.00%
6.80%
26.40%18.20%
25.00%
25.50%
18.20%
15.90%
18.20%
25.00%
9.00%
9.10%25.00%
11.50%27.30%
25.00%
11.70% 9.10%
26.40%
14.00% 13.3%
25.50%
35.10%42.20%
15.90% 21.10%
20.0%
9.00%
15.80%15.60%11.50%
12.30%8.9%11.70%
1.80%
30.50%20.00%
11.10%
29.20%
33.30%
33.30%
14.60%20.00%
11.10%
11.10% 10.00%
11.10%
7.80% 10.00%
22.20%
6.80% 6.70% 11.10%
26.40%
12.20% 10.0%
25.50%
12.20%10.00%
15.90%
22.00%25.0%
9.00%
22.00% 25.00%
11.50%
12.20%15.0%
11.70%19.50% 15.0%
26.40%
12.20%7.1%
25.50%
12.20%14.30%
15.90%
22.00%21.4%
9.00%
22.00%
14.30%
11.50%
12.20%
7.1%
11.70%19.50%
35.7%
30.50%22.20%
50%
29.20%
5.60%
14.60%
38.90%
11.10% 22.20%50.00%
7.80%
6.80% 11.10%
26.40% 25.80% 30.0%
25.50% 25.80%10.00%
15.90%24.20%
20.0%
9.00%
6.50%
10.00%
11.50%
12.90%
20.0%
11.70%4.80%
10.0%
30.50%
12.5%
50.00%
29.20%
34.4%
50.00%
14.60%
9.4%
11.10%
25.0%
7.80%6.3%
6.80%12.5%
30.50%
12.5%0%
No Data
29.20%
34.4%
14.60%
9.4%
11.10%
25.0%
7.80%6.3%
6.80%12.5%
26.40% 25.80% 30.2%
25.50% 25.80%
30.20%
15.90%24.20%
23.3%9.00%
6.50%
4.70%11.50%
12.90%9.3%11.70%
4.80% 2.3%
26.40%21.50%
33.3%
25.50%24.30%
15.90% 24.30%
9.00% 6.50%
50.00%
11.50% 10.30%
16.7%11.70% 13.10%
30.50% 28.60%
60.0%
29.20% 28.60%
20.00%14.60%
12.20%
11.10%12.20%
7.80%8.20%
6.80% 10.20%20.00%
26.40%21.50% 18.30%
25.50%24.30% 28.00%
15.90% 24.30% 25.8%
9.00% 6.50% 4.30%
11.50% 10.30% 9.7%
11.70% 13.10% 14.0%
26.40%
50.60%
25.50%
32.90%
15.90%
7.60%
9.00%
5.10%
11.50%
1.30%11.70%
2.50%
26.40%
41.90%
22.2%
25.50%
25.70%
16.7%
15.90%
12.20%
11.1%
9.00%
6.80%
22.2%
11.50%
12.20%
22.2%
11.70%1.40% 5.6%
26.40%
41.90%50.0%
25.50%
25.70%15.90%
12.20% 50.0%9.00%
6.80%11.50%
12.20%11.70%1.40%
26.40%
41.90%48.1%
25.50%
25.70%
29.6%15.90%
12.20%
11.1%
9.00%
6.80%
1.9%
11.50%
12.20%9.3%11.70%
1.40%
26.40%20.70%
25.50%28.20%
15.90%12.60%
9.00%
7.20%
11.50%
15.30%
11.70% 15.90%
26.40% 26.70%
25.50%31.10%
25.0%
15.90%13.30%
9.00%
15.60%
37.5%
11.50%
11.10%
25.0%
11.70%2.20%
12.5%
30.50%38.20%
29.20%
31.80%
14.60%
12.90%11.10%
8.60%7.80%4.70%
6.80% 3.90%
26.40% 26.70%
40.0%
25.50%31.10%
30.0%15.90%
13.30%
20.0%
9.00%
15.60%
10.0%
11.50%
11.10%11.70%2.20%
30.50% 28.60%33.30%
29.20%40% 28.60%
14.60%
20%28.60%
11.10%
8.60%9.50%
7.80%
6.80% 2.90%
26.40%18.20% 14.3%
25.50%
18.20% 28.60%
15.90%
18.20%14.3%
9.00%
9.10%
11.50%27.30%
28.6%
11.70% 9.10%14.3%
30.50%
50.00%
29.20%
16.70%
100.00%
14.60%
11.10%16.70%
7.80%16.70%
6.80%
26.40%
12.20%
28.6%
25.50%
12.20%
14.30%
15.90%
22.00%
14.3%
9.00%
22.00%
28.60%
11.50%
12.20%
14.3%11.70%19.50%
30.50% 28.60%33.30%
29.20% 28.60%
33.30%
14.60%12.20%
33.30%11.10%
12.20%
7.80%8.20%
6.80% 10.20%
30.50%
12.5% 12.50%
29.20%
34.4% 37.50%
14.60%
9.4%12.50%
11.10%
25.0%20.80%
7.80%6.3%
8.30%
6.80%12.5% 8.30%
30.50%22.20%
0%No Data
29.20%
5.60%
14.60%
38.90%
11.10% 22.20%
7.80%
6.80% 11.10%
30.50%
50.00%
29.20%
16.70%
14.60%
11.10%16.70%
100.00%
7.80%16.70%
6.80%
30.50%22.20% 18.80%
29.20%
5.60%6.30%
14.60%
38.90% 43.80%
11.10% 22.20% 18.80%
7.80%
6.80% 11.10% 12.50%
26.40% 25.80%
14.30%
25.50% 25.80%
15.90%24.20%
28.60%
9.00%
6.50%
14.30%
11.50%
12.90%
28.60%
11.70%4.80%
14.30%
30.50% 28.60% 24.4%
29.20% 28.60%29.30%
14.60%12.20%
12.20%
11.10%12.20%
14.60%
7.80%8.20% 9.80%
6.80% 10.20% 9.80%
26.40% 25.80%
25.50% 25.80%
50.00%
15.90%24.20%
50.0%9.00%
6.50%11.50%
12.90%11.70%
4.80%
26.40%
14.00% 16.7%
25.50%
35.10%
8.30%
15.90% 21.10%
25.0%
9.00%15.80%
16.70%
11.50%
12.30%
25.0%
11.70%1.80%
8.3%
30.50%
45.50%
29.20%
18.20%
14.60%18.20%
11.10%
9.10%7.80%
6.80% 9.10%
30.50%24.10%
11.10%
29.20%
24.10%
22.20%
14.60%
13.80%
22.20%
11.10%
10.30% 22.20%
7.80%
20.70% 11.10%
6.80% 6.90% 11.10%
30.50%20.00% 23.80%
29.20%
33.30%33.30%
14.60%20.00%
23.80%
11.10% 10.00%
9.50%7.80% 10.00%
4.80%6.80% 6.70% 4.80%
30.50%
12.5%
29.20%
34.4%
16.7%
14.60%
9.4%
11.10%
25.0%
50.0%
7.80%6.3%
6.80%12.5%
33.3%
26.40%21.50%
50.00%
25.50%24.30%
15.90% 24.30%25.0%
9.00% 6.50%
11.50% 10.30% 12.50%
11.70% 13.10% 12.5%
Time to Case Termination - Status Offenses13
The data represent the amount of time between the date the petition is filed to the date the case is terminated in JUS-TICE for all cases terminated in state fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18. The analysis separates youth adjudicated for delinquent behaviors and youth adjudicated for status offenses.
FY 2017 July 1, 2016-June 30, 2017: State, District/Team Comparisons
25The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Juvenile Justice System | JUSTICE Data, continued
Time to Case Termination Team 1
Time to Case Termination Team 4
Time to Case Termination Team 7
Time to Case Termination Team 10.3
Time to Case Termination Team 11.3
Time to Case Termination Team 12.3
41.0% 38.9%
64.5%
19.3% 17.8%
24.2%
15.7%28.9%
11.3%
7.2%
5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=83
FY 2016n=90
FY 2017n=62
56.0%64.5%
36.2%24.2%
7.8% 11.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 1
16.1% 18.6%
57.7%17.1%
18.9%
35.8%
20.5% 13.2%
6.6%
13.7%11.4%
14.7%19.5%
17.8% 18.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=409
FY 2016n=370
FY 2017n=106
56.0% 57.7%
36.2% 35.8%
7.8% 6.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 4
16.9% 18.2%
44.4%
23.4% 21.8%
55.6%
23.4%18.2%
11.7% 23.6%
9.1%
12.7%15.6%
5.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=77
FY 2016n=55
FY 2017n=9
56.0%44.4%
36.2% 55.6%
7.8%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 7
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
56.0%64.0%
50%
36.2%28.0%
50%
7.8% 8.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 10 Team 10.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2015n=35
FY 2016n=28
FY 2017n=28
Chart Title
56.0%48.6%
9.1%
36.2%41.9%
45.5%
7.8% 9.5%
45.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 11 Team 11.3
22.6%
37.2%
58.8%14.5%
33.7%
33.3%
4.8%
3.5%
7.8%
9.7%
12.8%
12.9%
11.6%
35.5%
1.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=62
FY 2016n=86
FY 2017n=51
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
State District 12 Team 12.3
1096 days and up over 3 years
731-1095 days within 3 years
545-730 days within 2 years
366-545 days within 18 months
181-365 days within 1 year
0-180 days within 6 months
37.5%
18.2%
50.0%
50.0%
18.2%
12.5%
12.5%
37.5%
18.2%
18.2%
27.3%
42.9%
14.3%9.1%
45.5%46.4%
25.7%
14.3%
10.7%
45.5%14.3%
7.1%
7.1%8.6%
5.7%2.9%
7.8%
36.2%
56.0%63.6% 58.8%
33.3%30.3%
6.1% 7.8%
JJ Case Termination - Team 1
JJ Case Termination - Team 5.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 12.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 5.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 11.4
JJ Case Termination - Team 6.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 10.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 8.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 8.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 8.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 2.1 JJ Case Termination - Team 7JJ Case Termination - Team 5.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 12.1
JJ Case Termination - Team 10.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 10.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 9.1
Lincoln
JJ Case Termination - Team 12.3
1096 thru highest - over 3 years
731 thru 1095- up to 3 years
546 thru 730 days - up to 2 years
366-545 days - up to 18 months
181-365 days - up to 1 year
0-180 days - up to 6 months
JJ Case Termination - Team 2.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 2.3
JJ Case Termination - Team 3
JJ Case Termination - Team 4 JJ Case Termination - Team 6.2
JJ Case Termination - Team 9.2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 1
n=52
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26,2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 2n=63
Team 2.1n=8
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 2n=63
Team 2.2n=5
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 2n=63
Team 2.3n=50
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 3n=174
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 4n=263
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 5n=35
Team 5.1n=8
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 5n=45
Team 5.2n=27
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 5n=35
Team 5.3n=6
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 6n=60
Team 6.1n=55
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 6n=29
Team 6.1n=20
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 6n=60
Team 6.2n=5
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 7
n=21
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 8n=11
Team 8.1n=0
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 8n=6
Team 8.2n=4
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 8n=11
Team 8.3n=4
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 9n=57
Team 9.1n=45
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 9n=30
Team 9.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 10n=41
Team 10.1n=20
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 10n=41
Team 10.2n=14
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 10n=18
Team 10.3n=2
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.1n=10
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.2n=2
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.3n=0
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.4n=43
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 12n=107
Team 12.1n=6
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 12n=49
Team 12.2n=5
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 12n=107
Team 12.3n=93
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 1
n=79
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 2n=74
Team 2.1n=18
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 2n=74
Team 2.2n=2
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 2n=74
Team 2.3n=54
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District/Team 3n=333
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 5n=45
Team 5.3n=8
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 4n=233
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 5n=45
Team 5.1n=10
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 5n=35
Team 5.2n=21
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 8n=11
Team 8.2n=7
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 8n=6
Team 8.3n=1
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 10n=41
Team 10.3n=7
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 12n=49
Team 12.1n=3
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.4n=24
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 10n=18
Team 10.2n=0
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 8n=6
Team 8.1n=1
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 10n=18
Team 10.1n=16
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.3n=7
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraska
n=732
District 12n=49
Team 12.3n=41
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 11n=62
Team 11.2n=2
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 9n=57
Team 9.2n=12
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District/Team 7
n=11
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 6n=29
Team 6.2n=9
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 9n=30
Team 9.1n=21
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=732
District 11n=32
Team 11.1n=6
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=1,153
District 12n=107
Team 12.2n=8
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
30.50%
53.80%
29.20%
36.50%14.60%
5.80%
11.10%
1.90%
7.80%
1.90%6.80%
30.50%
44.40%50.00%
29.20%
31.70%
14.60%
12.70%
25.00%
11.10%
4.80%7.80%
4.80%
12.50%
6.80%1.60%
12.50%
30.50%
44.40%
29.20%
31.70%
80.00%
14.60%
12.70%
20.00%
11.10%
4.80%7.80%
4.80%6.80%1.60%
30.50%
44.40% 48.00%
29.20%
31.70%32.00%
14.60%
12.70%10.00%
11.10%
4.80% 6.00%7.80%
4.80% 4.00%6.80%1.60%
30.50%
14.40%
29.20%
23.60%
14.60%
17.80%
11.10%
16.10%
7.80%
14.90%
6.80%13.20%
26.40%33.80%
25.50%
22.40%
15.90%18.30%
9.00%
9.50%11.50%
9.90%11.70%
6.10%
30.50% 28.60%
12.50%
29.20%40%
62.50%
14.60%
20%12.50%11.10%
8.60%7.80%
6.80% 2.90%12.50%
26.40% 26.70% 29.6%
25.50%31.10%
33.3%
15.90%13.30%
14.8%9.00%
15.60%11.1%11.50%
11.10% 11.1%11.70%2.20%
30.50% 28.60%33.30%
29.20%40%
50.00%
14.60%
20%11.10%
8.60% 16.70%7.80%
6.80% 2.90%
26.40%
8.30% 9.1%
25.50%
11.70% 12.7%
15.90%
8.30% 5.5%
9.00%
11.70%7.3%
11.50%
5.00%5.5%
11.70%
55.00%60.0%
30.50%24.10%
30.00%
29.20%
24.10%
25.00%
14.60%
13.80%10.00%
11.10%
10.30% 5.00%
7.80%
20.70% 25.00%
6.80% 6.90% 5.00%
26.40%
8.30%
25.50%
11.70%
15.90%
8.30%40.0%
9.00%
11.70%
60.0%
11.50%
5.00%
11.70%
55.00%
26.40%19.00%
25.50%
28.60%
15.90%14.30%
9.00%9.50%
11.50% 19.00%
11.70% 9.50%
26.40%18.20%
0.0%No Data
25.50%
18.20%
15.90%
18.20%
9.00%
9.10%
11.50%27.30%
11.70% 9.10%
30.50%
50.00%
75.00%
29.20%
16.70%
14.60%
11.10%16.70%
7.80%16.70%
25.00%
6.80%
26.40%18.20%
25.00%
25.50%
18.20%
15.90%
18.20%
25.00%
9.00%
9.10%25.00%
11.50%27.30%
25.00%
11.70% 9.10%
26.40%
14.00% 13.3%
25.50%
35.10%42.20%
15.90% 21.10%
20.0%
9.00%
15.80%15.60%11.50%
12.30%8.9%11.70%
1.80%
30.50%20.00%
11.10%
29.20%
33.30%
33.30%
14.60%20.00%
11.10%
11.10% 10.00%
11.10%
7.80% 10.00%
22.20%
6.80% 6.70% 11.10%
26.40%
12.20% 10.0%
25.50%
12.20%10.00%
15.90%
22.00%25.0%
9.00%
22.00% 25.00%
11.50%
12.20%15.0%
11.70%19.50% 15.0%
26.40%
12.20%7.1%
25.50%
12.20%14.30%
15.90%
22.00%21.4%
9.00%
22.00%
14.30%
11.50%
12.20%
7.1%
11.70%19.50%
35.7%
30.50%22.20%
50%
29.20%
5.60%
14.60%
38.90%
11.10% 22.20%50.00%
7.80%
6.80% 11.10%
26.40% 25.80% 30.0%
25.50% 25.80%10.00%
15.90%24.20%
20.0%
9.00%
6.50%
10.00%
11.50%
12.90%
20.0%
11.70%4.80%
10.0%
30.50%
12.5%
50.00%
29.20%
34.4%
50.00%
14.60%
9.4%
11.10%
25.0%
7.80%6.3%
6.80%12.5%
30.50%
12.5%0%
No Data
29.20%
34.4%
14.60%
9.4%
11.10%
25.0%
7.80%6.3%
6.80%12.5%
26.40% 25.80% 30.2%
25.50% 25.80%
30.20%
15.90%24.20%
23.3%9.00%
6.50%
4.70%11.50%
12.90%9.3%11.70%
4.80% 2.3%
26.40%21.50%
33.3%
25.50%24.30%
15.90% 24.30%
9.00% 6.50%
50.00%
11.50% 10.30%
16.7%11.70% 13.10%
30.50% 28.60%
60.0%
29.20% 28.60%
20.00%14.60%
12.20%
11.10%12.20%
7.80%8.20%
6.80% 10.20%20.00%
26.40%21.50% 18.30%
25.50%24.30% 28.00%
15.90% 24.30% 25.8%
9.00% 6.50% 4.30%
11.50% 10.30% 9.7%
11.70% 13.10% 14.0%
26.40%
50.60%
25.50%
32.90%
15.90%
7.60%
9.00%
5.10%
11.50%
1.30%11.70%
2.50%
26.40%
41.90%
22.2%
25.50%
25.70%
16.7%
15.90%
12.20%
11.1%
9.00%
6.80%
22.2%
11.50%
12.20%
22.2%
11.70%1.40% 5.6%
26.40%
41.90%50.0%
25.50%
25.70%15.90%
12.20% 50.0%9.00%
6.80%11.50%
12.20%11.70%1.40%
26.40%
41.90%48.1%
25.50%
25.70%
29.6%15.90%
12.20%
11.1%
9.00%
6.80%
1.9%
11.50%
12.20%9.3%11.70%
1.40%
26.40%20.70%
25.50%28.20%
15.90%12.60%
9.00%
7.20%
11.50%
15.30%
11.70% 15.90%
26.40% 26.70%
25.50%31.10%
25.0%
15.90%13.30%
9.00%
15.60%
37.5%
11.50%
11.10%
25.0%
11.70%2.20%
12.5%
30.50%38.20%
29.20%
31.80%
14.60%
12.90%11.10%
8.60%7.80%4.70%
6.80% 3.90%
26.40% 26.70%
40.0%
25.50%31.10%
30.0%15.90%
13.30%
20.0%
9.00%
15.60%
10.0%
11.50%
11.10%11.70%2.20%
30.50% 28.60%33.30%
29.20%40% 28.60%
14.60%
20%28.60%
11.10%
8.60%9.50%
7.80%
6.80% 2.90%
26.40%18.20% 14.3%
25.50%
18.20% 28.60%
15.90%
18.20%14.3%
9.00%
9.10%
11.50%27.30%
28.6%
11.70% 9.10%14.3%
30.50%
50.00%
29.20%
16.70%
100.00%
14.60%
11.10%16.70%
7.80%16.70%
6.80%
26.40%
12.20%
28.6%
25.50%
12.20%
14.30%
15.90%
22.00%
14.3%
9.00%
22.00%
28.60%
11.50%
12.20%
14.3%11.70%19.50%
30.50% 28.60%33.30%
29.20% 28.60%
33.30%
14.60%12.20%
33.30%11.10%
12.20%
7.80%8.20%
6.80% 10.20%
30.50%
12.5% 12.50%
29.20%
34.4% 37.50%
14.60%
9.4%12.50%
11.10%
25.0%20.80%
7.80%6.3%
8.30%
6.80%12.5% 8.30%
30.50%22.20%
0%No Data
29.20%
5.60%
14.60%
38.90%
11.10% 22.20%
7.80%
6.80% 11.10%
30.50%
50.00%
29.20%
16.70%
14.60%
11.10%16.70%
100.00%
7.80%16.70%
6.80%
30.50%22.20% 18.80%
29.20%
5.60%6.30%
14.60%
38.90% 43.80%
11.10% 22.20% 18.80%
7.80%
6.80% 11.10% 12.50%
26.40% 25.80%
14.30%
25.50% 25.80%
15.90%24.20%
28.60%
9.00%
6.50%
14.30%
11.50%
12.90%
28.60%
11.70%4.80%
14.30%
30.50% 28.60% 24.4%
29.20% 28.60%29.30%
14.60%12.20%
12.20%
11.10%12.20%
14.60%
7.80%8.20% 9.80%
6.80% 10.20% 9.80%
26.40% 25.80%
25.50% 25.80%
50.00%
15.90%24.20%
50.0%9.00%
6.50%11.50%
12.90%11.70%
4.80%
26.40%
14.00% 16.7%
25.50%
35.10%
8.30%
15.90% 21.10%
25.0%
9.00%15.80%
16.70%
11.50%
12.30%
25.0%
11.70%1.80%
8.3%
30.50%
45.50%
29.20%
18.20%
14.60%18.20%
11.10%
9.10%7.80%
6.80% 9.10%
30.50%24.10%
11.10%
29.20%
24.10%
22.20%
14.60%
13.80%
22.20%
11.10%
10.30% 22.20%
7.80%
20.70% 11.10%
6.80% 6.90% 11.10%
30.50%20.00% 23.80%
29.20%
33.30%33.30%
14.60%20.00%
23.80%
11.10% 10.00%
9.50%7.80% 10.00%
4.80%6.80% 6.70% 4.80%
30.50%
12.5%
29.20%
34.4%
16.7%
14.60%
9.4%
11.10%
25.0%
50.0%
7.80%6.3%
6.80%12.5%
33.3%
26.40%21.50%
50.00%
25.50%24.30%
15.90% 24.30%25.0%
9.00% 6.50%
11.50% 10.30% 12.50%
11.70% 13.10% 12.5%
FY 2018Average Months - Team 19.0
Average Months - District 12.0Average Months - State 14.3
Time to Case Termination - Status Offenses13
FY 2018 July 1, 2017-February 26, 2018: State, District/Team Comparisons
26 2016-2017 Data Reports
Juvenile Justice System | JUSTICE Data, continued
Time to Case Termination Team 1
Time to Case Termination Team 4
Time to Case Termination Team 7
Time to Case Termination Team 10.3
Time to Case Termination Team 11.3
Time to Case Termination Team 12.3
41.0% 38.9%
64.5%
19.3% 17.8%
24.2%
15.7%28.9%
11.3%
7.2%
5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=83
FY 2016n=90
FY 2017n=62
56.0%64.5%
36.2%24.2%
7.8% 11.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 1
16.1% 18.6%
57.7%17.1%
18.9%
35.8%
20.5% 13.2%
6.6%
13.7%11.4%
14.7%19.5%
17.8% 18.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=409
FY 2016n=370
FY 2017n=106
56.0% 57.7%
36.2% 35.8%
7.8% 6.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 4
16.9% 18.2%
44.4%
23.4% 21.8%
55.6%
23.4%18.2%
11.7% 23.6%
9.1%
12.7%15.6%
5.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=77
FY 2016n=55
FY 2017n=9
56.0%44.4%
36.2% 55.6%
7.8%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 7
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
56.0%64.0%
50%
36.2%28.0%
50%
7.8% 8.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 10 Team 10.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2015n=35
FY 2016n=28
FY 2017n=28
Chart Title
56.0%48.6%
9.1%
36.2%41.9%
45.5%
7.8% 9.5%
45.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 11 Team 11.3
22.6%
37.2%
58.8%14.5%
33.7%
33.3%
4.8%
3.5%
7.8%
9.7%
12.8%
12.9%
11.6%
35.5%
1.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=62
FY 2016n=86
FY 2017n=51
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
State District 12 Team 12.3
1096 days and up over 3 years
731-1095 days within 3 years
545-730 days within 2 years
366-545 days within 18 months
181-365 days within 1 year
0-180 days within 6 months
37.5%
18.2%
50.0%
50.0%
18.2%
12.5%
12.5%
37.5%
18.2%
18.2%
27.3%
42.9%
14.3%9.1%
45.5%46.4%
25.7%
14.3%
10.7%
45.5%14.3%
7.1%
7.1%8.6%
5.7%2.9%
7.8%
36.2%
56.0%63.6% 58.8%
33.3%30.3%
6.1% 7.8%
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 12.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.4
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 6.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 10.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 8.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 8.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 8.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.1 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 7Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 12.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 10.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 10.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 9.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 12.3
1096 thru highest - over 3 years
731 thru 1095- up to 3 years
546 thru 730 days - up to 2 years
366-545 days - up to 18 months
181-365 days - up to 1 year
0-180 days - up to 6 months
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 4 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 6.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 9.2
14.40%
14.40%7.50%
8.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 1n=257
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
15.30%6.80%
4.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 1n=124
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26,2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 2n=359
Team 2.1n=43
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 2n=225
Team 2.1n=30
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 2n=359
Team 2.2n=20
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 2n=225
Team 2.2n=14
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 2n=359
Team 2.3n=296
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 2n=225
Team 2.3n=181
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 3n=507
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 3n=261
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
12.40%7.50%
7.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 4n=1,094
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
10.50%6.80%
6.10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 4n=775
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 5n=419
Team 5.1n=108
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 5n=261
Team 5.1n=76
July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 5n=419
Team 5.2n=277
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 5n=261
Team 5.2n=166
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 5n=419
Team 5.3n=34
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 5n=261
Team 5.3n=19
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 6n=518
Team 6.1n=418
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 6n=142
Team 6.1n=67
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
7.90%
13.00%
7.50%
3.90%
10.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 6n=518
Team 6.2n=100
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
16.90%
18.70%
6.80%
7.70%
5.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 6n=142
Team 6.2n=75
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 7n=157
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 7n=124
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 8n=105
Team 8.1n=29
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 8n=50
Team 8.1n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 8n=105
Team 8.2n=42
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 8n=50
Team 8.2n=17
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 8n=105
Team 8.3n=34
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 8n=50
Team 8.3n=7
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%16.00%
16.60%7.50%9.70%
8.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 9n=555
Team 9.1n=451
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60% 22.90%24.40%
6.80%6.30%
5.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 9n=284
Team 9.1n=238
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 9n=555
Team 9.2n=104
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 9n=284
Team 9.2n=46
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 10n=323
Team 10.1n=248
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 10n=237
Team 10.1n=177
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 10n=323
Team 10.2n=50
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 10n=237
Team 10.2n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 10n=323
Team 10.3n=25
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 10n=237
Team 10.3n=34
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
18.70%
17.60%
7.50%
5.50%
5.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.1n=119
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%15.40%
22.00%
6.80% 8.40%
5.10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.1n=59
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.2n=65
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.2n=39
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.3n=14
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.3n=3
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.4n=112
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.4n=113
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 12n=404
Team 12.1n=81
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 12n=202
Team 12.1n=34
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
13.10%
15.20%7.50%
7.20%
4.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 12n=404
Team 12.2n=46
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
8.90%
10.70%
6.80%
3.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 12n=202
Team 12.2n=28
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
13.10%
13.00%
7.50%
7.20%
7.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 12n=404
Team 12.3n=277
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
8.90% 5.00%6.80%
3.50% 4.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 12n=202
Team 12.3n=140
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
Lincoln
33.00%43.20%
24.30%
24.10%
7.20%
6.20%13.60%3.90%
40.20%49.20%
24.40%
25.80%
7.40%
3.20%7.80%2.40%
33.00%39.80%
18.60%
24.30%
32.90%
34.90%
14.40%
14.80%
9.30%
7.50%
6.70%
11.60%
7.20%
4.20%
20.90%
13.60%
1.70% 4.70%
40.20% 38.20%30.00%
24.40%35.60%
30.00%
13.60%
12.00%
23.00%
6.80%
5.30%3.30%
7.40%
5.30%10.00%
7.80%3.60% 3.30%
33.00%39.80%
30.0%
24.30%
32.90%
40.0%
14.40%
14.80%25.0%
7.50%
6.70%
7.20%
4.20%13.60%
1.70% 5.0%
40.20% 38.20%
24.40%35.60%
50.00%
13.60%
12.00%
21.40%
6.80%
5.30%7.40%
5.30%
14.30%
7.80% 3.60% 7.10%
33.00%39.80% 43.60%
24.30%
32.90%32.10%
14.40%
14.80%14.90%
7.50%
6.70%6.40%
7.20%
4.20% 2.00%13.60%
1.70% 1.00%
40.20% 38.20% 42.00%
24.40%35.60%
35.40%
13.60%
12.00%9.40%6.80%
5.30% 6.10%7.40%
5.30% 3.90%7.80%3.60% 3.30%
33.00%25.60%
24.30%
27.40%
14.40%17.00%
7.50% 8.30%
7.20% 9.90%
13.60% 11.80%
40.20%
20.70%
24.40%
22.20%
13.60%
16.50%
6.80%
11.10%
7.40%
15.30%
7.80%14.20%
33.00%
47.40%
24.30%
21.10%
7.20%
6.90%13.60%5.10%
40.20%
51.70%
24.40%
20.00%
7.40%7.70%
7.80% 4.00%
33.00%
49.20% 45.40%
24.30%
24.60% 34.30%14.40%
12.20%
13.00%
7.50%
8.10%
5.60%
7.20%
3.10%1.90%
13.60%
2.90%
40.20%
51.70%46.10%
24.40%
23.80% 31.60%
13.60%
10.00%
15.80%6.80%
8.00%
5.30%
7.40%
3.80%1.30%
7.80%2.70%
33.00%
49.20% 52.70%
24.30%
24.60% 20.90%14.40%
12.20% 11.20%7.50%
8.10% 8.70%
7.20%
3.10% 2.50%13.60%
2.90% 4.00%
40.20%
51.70%57.20%
24.40%
23.80%19.90%
13.60%
10.00% 6.00%6.80%
8.00% 9.00%7.40%
3.80% 3.60%7.80%
2.70% 4.20%
33.00%
49.20%
32.40%
24.30%
24.60%
23.50%
14.40%
12.20%
17.60%
7.50%
8.10%
11.80%7.20%
3.10%11.80%13.60%
2.90% 2.90%
40.20%
51.70%
26.30%
24.40%
23.80%
26.30%
13.60%
10.00%
21.10%
6.80%
8.00%
10.50%
7.40%
3.80%15.80%
7.80%2.70%
33.00%
9.30%4.30%
24.30%
10.40%
6.90%
14.40%
7.90%
6.70%
7.50%
3.90%
2.40%
7.20%
5.00%
2.40%
13.60%
63.50%
77.30%
40.20%30.30%
20.90%
24.40%
23.90%
28.40%
13.60%
16.90%
14.90%
6.80%
7.70%
10.40%
7.40%
9.20%9.00%
7.80%12.00%
16.40%
33.00%
9.30%
30.00%
24.30%
10.40%
25.00%
7.20%
5.00%
16.00%
13.60%
63.50%
6.00%
40.20%30.30%
38.70%
24.40%
23.90%
20.00%
7.40%
9.20%9.30%
7.80%12.00%
8.00%
33.00%
22.30%
24.30%39.50%
14.40%
17.80%7.50%
8.30%7.20%
9.60%13.60%
2.50%
40.20%
26.60%
24.40%
33.10%
13.60%16.90%
6.80% 9.70%
7.40%8.90%
7.80% 4.80%
33.00%28.60%
3.40%
24.30%
22.90%
41.40%
14.40% 22.90%
13.80%
7.50% 4.80%
7.20% 8.60%
10.30%
13.60% 12.40%
31.00%
40.20% 42.00% 42.30%
24.40%26.00%
19.20%
13.60%14.00%
7.70%
6.80%8.00%
11.50%
7.40%6.00%
11.50%
7.80% 4.00% 7.70%
33.00%28.60%
57.10%
24.30%
22.90%
9.50%14.40% 22.90%
16.70%7.50% 4.80%
7.10%7.20% 8.60%
7.10%13.60% 12.40%2.40%
40.20% 42.00%
52.90%
24.40%26.00%
23.50%
13.60%14.00%
17.60%6.80%
8.00%
5.90%
7.40%6.00%
7.80% 4.00%
33.00%28.60%
14.70%
24.30%
22.90%
23.50%
14.40% 22.90%
38.20%
7.50% 4.80%5.90%
7.20% 8.60%8.80%
13.60% 12.40% 8.80%
40.20% 42.00%
14.30%
24.40%26.00%
57.10%
13.60%14.00%
28.60%6.80%
8.00%7.40%
6.00%7.80% 4.00%
33.00%23.20% 25.50%
24.30%35.50%
39.90%
7.20%5.60%
5.10%13.60% 9.90%4.00%
40.20%32.70% 34.90%
24.40%
26.10%26.90%
7.40%6.00%
5.00%7.80% 6.00% 3.40%
33.00%23.20%
13.50%
24.30%35.50%
16.30%
14.40%16.00%
13.50%
7.50%9.70%
13.50%
7.20%5.60%
7.70%
13.60% 9.90%
35.60%
40.20%32.70%
21.70%
24.40%
26.10%
21.70%
13.60% 22.90%
15.20%
6.80%6.30%
10.90%
7.40%6.00%
10.90%
7.80% 6.00%
19.60%
33.00%
18.30%13.70%
24.30%
18.30%
15.30%
14.40%
20.10%
21.00%
7.50%
12.70%16.10%
7.20%
13.90% 16.90%
13.60% 16.70% 16.90%
40.20%
27.00%21.50%
24.40%
16.90%
17.50%
13.60%
12.20%
6.80%
6.80%
5.10%
5.10%
7.40%
7.20%
7.90%
7.80%
31.60%41.20%
33.00%
18.30%
40.0%
24.30%
18.30%
26.00%
14.40%
20.10%
8.0%7.50%
12.70%
7.20%
13.90% 6.0%
13.60% 16.70% 20.0%
40.20%27.00%
46.00%
24.40%
16.90%
15.40%
13.60%
12.20%
30.80%6.80%
5.10%
7.40%
7.20%
7.70%7.80%
31.60%
33.00%
18.30% 20.0%
24.30%
18.30%
32.00%
14.40%
20.10%
36.0%
7.50%
12.70%
4.00%
7.20%
13.90%
13.60% 16.70%8.0%
40.20%
27.00%
41.20%
24.40%
16.90%
14.70%
13.60%
12.20%
26.50%
6.80%
5.10%
8.80%7.40%
7.20%
2.90%7.80%
31.60%
5.90%
33.00%37.10% 33.60%
24.30%
27.70%26.10%
7.20%
8.10%14.30%
13.60%
2.90% 2.50%
40.20%32.20%
18.60%
24.40%
29.00%
23.70%
7.40% 8.90%
25.40%
7.80% 6.10% 5.10%
33.00%37.10%
52.30%
24.30%
27.70%
38.50%
14.40%
18.70%
9.20%
7.50%
5.50%7.20%
8.10%13.60%
2.90%
40.20%32.20%
51.30%
24.40%
29.00%
17.90%
13.60%15.40%
12.80%
6.80% 8.40%
10.30%7.40% 8.90%
7.80% 6.10% 7.70%
33.00%37.10% 35.70%
24.30%
27.70% 28.60%
14.40%
18.70%
7.10%
7.50%
5.50%21.40%7.20%
8.10%13.60%
2.90%7.10%
40.20%32.20%
66.70%
24.40%
29.00%
33.30%
13.60%15.40%
6.80% 8.40%
7.40% 8.90%
7.80% 6.10%
33.00%37.10%
32.10%
24.30%
27.70%
23.20%
14.40%
18.70%
26.80%
7.50%
5.50% 6.30%7.20%
8.10% 7.10%13.60%
2.90% 4.50%
40.20%32.20% 31.90%
24.40%
29.00%35.40%
13.60%15.40%
13.30%
6.80% 8.40%9.70%
7.40% 8.90%3.50%
7.80% 6.10% 6.20%
33.00% 31.40% 30.90%
24.30%20.00%
37.00%
14.40%
13.10%
12.30%7.50%
7.20%
7.40%7.20%
10.10%
6.20%13.60%
18.10%
6.20%
40.20%
51.50%
20.60%
24.40%
27.20%
44.10%
13.60%
8.90%
23.50%6.80%
3.50% 2.90%7.40%4.00%
7.80% 5.00% 8.80%
33.00% 31.40%
52.20%
24.30%20.00%
15.20%
7.20%
10.10%
8.70%13.60%18.10%
4.30%
40.20%
51.50% 53.60%
24.40%
27.20%32.10%
7.40%4.00%
7.80% 5.00% 3.60%
33.00% 31.40% 28.20%
24.30%20.00%
15.90%
7.20%
10.10%
11.60%
13.60%18.10%
23.80%
40.20%
51.50%58.60%
24.40%
27.20%22.10%
7.40%4.00% 5.70%
7.80% 5.00% 4.30%
FY 2017Average Months - Team 29.5
Average Months - District 17.1Average Months - State 20.9
Time To Case Termination - Delinquency Offenses13
FY 2017 July 1, 2016-June 30, 2017: State, District/Team Comparisons
27The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Juvenile Justice System | JUSTICE Data, continued
Time to Case Termination Team 1
Time to Case Termination Team 4
Time to Case Termination Team 7
Time to Case Termination Team 10.3
Time to Case Termination Team 11.3
Time to Case Termination Team 12.3
41.0% 38.9%
64.5%
19.3% 17.8%
24.2%
15.7%28.9%
11.3%
7.2%
5.6%10.8%6.7%6.0%2.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=83
FY 2016n=90
FY 2017n=62
56.0%64.5%
36.2%24.2%
7.8% 11.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 1
16.1% 18.6%
57.7%17.1%
18.9%
35.8%
20.5% 13.2%
6.6%
13.7%11.4%
14.7%19.5%
17.8% 18.4%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=409
FY 2016n=370
FY 2017n=106
56.0% 57.7%
36.2% 35.8%
7.8% 6.6%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 4
16.9% 18.2%
44.4%
23.4% 21.8%
55.6%
23.4%18.2%
11.7% 23.6%
9.1%
12.7%15.6%
5.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=77
FY 2016n=55
FY 2017n=9
56.0%44.4%
36.2% 55.6%
7.8%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District/ Team 7
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
56.0%64.0%
50%
36.2%28.0%
50%
7.8% 8.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 10 Team 10.3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2015n=35
FY 2016n=28
FY 2017n=28
Chart Title
56.0%48.6%
9.1%
36.2%41.9%
45.5%
7.8% 9.5%
45.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
STATE District 11 Team 11.3
22.6%
37.2%
58.8%14.5%
33.7%
33.3%
4.8%
3.5%
7.8%
9.7%
12.8%
12.9%
11.6%
35.5%
1.2%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
FY 2015n=62
FY 2016n=86
FY 2017n=51
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
State District 12 Team 12.3
1096 days and up over 3 years
731-1095 days within 3 years
545-730 days within 2 years
366-545 days within 18 months
181-365 days within 1 year
0-180 days within 6 months
37.5%
18.2%
50.0%
50.0%
18.2%
12.5%
12.5%
37.5%
18.2%
18.2%
27.3%
42.9%
14.3%9.1%
45.5%46.4%
25.7%
14.3%
10.7%
45.5%14.3%
7.1%
7.1%8.6%
5.7%2.9%
7.8%
36.2%
56.0%63.6% 58.8%
33.3%30.3%
6.1% 7.8%
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 12.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 11.4
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 6.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 10.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 8.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 8.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 8.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.1 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 7Delinquency Case Termination - Team 5.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 12.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 10.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 10.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 9.1
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 12.3
1096 thru highest - over 3 years
731 thru 1095- up to 3 years
546 thru 730 days - up to 2 years
366-545 days - up to 18 months
181-365 days - up to 1 year
0-180 days - up to 6 months
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 2.3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 3
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 4 Delinquency Case Termination - Team 6.2
Delinquency Case Termination - Team 9.2
14.40%
14.40%7.50%
8.20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 1n=257
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
15.30%6.80%
4.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 1n=124
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26,2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 2n=359
Team 2.1n=43
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 2n=225
Team 2.1n=30
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 2n=359
Team 2.2n=20
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 2n=225
Team 2.2n=14
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 2n=359
Team 2.3n=296
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 2n=225
Team 2.3n=181
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 3n=507
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 3n=261
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
12.40%7.50%
7.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 4n=1,094
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
10.50%6.80%
6.10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 4n=775
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 5n=419
Team 5.1n=108
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 5n=261
Team 5.1n=76
July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 5n=419
Team 5.2n=277
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 5n=261
Team 5.2n=166
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 5n=419
Team 5.3n=34
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 5n=261
Team 5.3n=19
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 6n=518
Team 6.1n=418
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 6n=142
Team 6.1n=67
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
7.90%
13.00%
7.50%
3.90%
10.00%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 6n=518
Team 6.2n=100
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
16.90%
18.70%
6.80%
7.70%
5.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 6n=142
Team 6.2n=75
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District/Team 7n=157
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District/Team 7n=124
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 8n=105
Team 8.1n=29
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 8n=50
Team 8.1n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 8n=105
Team 8.2n=42
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 8n=50
Team 8.2n=17
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 8n=105
Team 8.3n=34
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 8n=50
Team 8.3n=7
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%16.00%
16.60%7.50%9.70%
8.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 9n=555
Team 9.1n=451
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60% 22.90%24.40%
6.80%6.30%
5.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 9n=284
Team 9.1n=238
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 9n=555
Team 9.2n=104
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 9n=284
Team 9.2n=46
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 10n=323
Team 10.1n=248
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 10n=237
Team 10.1n=177
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 10n=323
Team 10.2n=50
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 10n=237
Team 10.2n=26
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 10n=323
Team 10.3n=25
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 10n=237
Team 10.3n=34
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
18.70%
17.60%
7.50%
5.50%
5.90%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.1n=119
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%15.40%
22.00%
6.80% 8.40%
5.10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.1n=59
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.2n=65
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.2n=39
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.3n=14
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.3n=3
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State of Nebraskan=5,012
District 11n=310
Team 11.4n=112
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 11n=214
Team 11.4n=113
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 12n=404
Team 12.1n=81
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 12n=202
Team 12.1n=34
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
13.10%
15.20%7.50%
7.20%
4.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 12n=404
Team 12.2n=46
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
8.90%
10.70%
6.80%
3.50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 12n=202
Team 12.2n=28
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
14.40%
13.10%
13.00%
7.50%
7.20%
7.60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=5,012
District 12n=404
Team 12.3n=277
FY 2017:July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017
13.60%
8.90% 5.00%6.80%
3.50% 4.30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
State ofNebraskan=2,899
District 12n=202
Team 12.3n=140
FY 2018 July 1, 2017 to February 26, 2018
Lincoln
33.00%43.20%
24.30%
24.10%
7.20%
6.20%13.60%3.90%
40.20%49.20%
24.40%
25.80%
7.40%
3.20%7.80%2.40%
33.00%39.80%
18.60%
24.30%
32.90%
34.90%
14.40%
14.80%
9.30%
7.50%
6.70%
11.60%
7.20%
4.20%
20.90%
13.60%
1.70% 4.70%
40.20% 38.20%30.00%
24.40%35.60%
30.00%
13.60%
12.00%
23.00%
6.80%
5.30%3.30%
7.40%
5.30%10.00%
7.80%3.60% 3.30%
33.00%39.80%
30.0%
24.30%
32.90%
40.0%
14.40%
14.80%25.0%
7.50%
6.70%
7.20%
4.20%13.60%
1.70% 5.0%
40.20% 38.20%
24.40%35.60%
50.00%
13.60%
12.00%
21.40%
6.80%
5.30%7.40%
5.30%
14.30%
7.80% 3.60% 7.10%
33.00%39.80% 43.60%
24.30%
32.90%32.10%
14.40%
14.80%14.90%
7.50%
6.70%6.40%
7.20%
4.20% 2.00%13.60%
1.70% 1.00%
40.20% 38.20% 42.00%
24.40%35.60%
35.40%
13.60%
12.00%9.40%6.80%
5.30% 6.10%7.40%
5.30% 3.90%7.80%3.60% 3.30%
33.00%25.60%
24.30%
27.40%
14.40%17.00%
7.50% 8.30%
7.20% 9.90%
13.60% 11.80%
40.20%
20.70%
24.40%
22.20%
13.60%
16.50%
6.80%
11.10%
7.40%
15.30%
7.80%14.20%
33.00%
47.40%
24.30%
21.10%
7.20%
6.90%13.60%5.10%
40.20%
51.70%
24.40%
20.00%
7.40%7.70%
7.80% 4.00%
33.00%
49.20% 45.40%
24.30%
24.60% 34.30%14.40%
12.20%
13.00%
7.50%
8.10%
5.60%
7.20%
3.10%1.90%
13.60%
2.90%
40.20%
51.70%46.10%
24.40%
23.80% 31.60%
13.60%
10.00%
15.80%6.80%
8.00%
5.30%
7.40%
3.80%1.30%
7.80%2.70%
33.00%
49.20% 52.70%
24.30%
24.60% 20.90%14.40%
12.20% 11.20%7.50%
8.10% 8.70%
7.20%
3.10% 2.50%13.60%
2.90% 4.00%
40.20%
51.70%57.20%
24.40%
23.80%19.90%
13.60%
10.00% 6.00%6.80%
8.00% 9.00%7.40%
3.80% 3.60%7.80%
2.70% 4.20%
33.00%
49.20%
32.40%
24.30%
24.60%
23.50%
14.40%
12.20%
17.60%
7.50%
8.10%
11.80%7.20%
3.10%11.80%13.60%
2.90% 2.90%
40.20%
51.70%
26.30%
24.40%
23.80%
26.30%
13.60%
10.00%
21.10%
6.80%
8.00%
10.50%
7.40%
3.80%15.80%
7.80%2.70%
33.00%
9.30%4.30%
24.30%
10.40%
6.90%
14.40%
7.90%
6.70%
7.50%
3.90%
2.40%
7.20%
5.00%
2.40%
13.60%
63.50%
77.30%
40.20%30.30%
20.90%
24.40%
23.90%
28.40%
13.60%
16.90%
14.90%
6.80%
7.70%
10.40%
7.40%
9.20%9.00%
7.80%12.00%
16.40%
33.00%
9.30%
30.00%
24.30%
10.40%
25.00%
7.20%
5.00%
16.00%
13.60%
63.50%
6.00%
40.20%30.30%
38.70%
24.40%
23.90%
20.00%
7.40%
9.20%9.30%
7.80%12.00%
8.00%
33.00%
22.30%
24.30%39.50%
14.40%
17.80%7.50%
8.30%7.20%
9.60%13.60%
2.50%
40.20%
26.60%
24.40%
33.10%
13.60%16.90%
6.80% 9.70%
7.40%8.90%
7.80% 4.80%
33.00%28.60%
3.40%
24.30%
22.90%
41.40%
14.40% 22.90%
13.80%
7.50% 4.80%
7.20% 8.60%
10.30%
13.60% 12.40%
31.00%
40.20% 42.00% 42.30%
24.40%26.00%
19.20%
13.60%14.00%
7.70%
6.80%8.00%
11.50%
7.40%6.00%
11.50%
7.80% 4.00% 7.70%
33.00%28.60%
57.10%
24.30%
22.90%
9.50%14.40% 22.90%
16.70%7.50% 4.80%
7.10%7.20% 8.60%
7.10%13.60% 12.40%2.40%
40.20% 42.00%
52.90%
24.40%26.00%
23.50%
13.60%14.00%
17.60%6.80%
8.00%
5.90%
7.40%6.00%
7.80% 4.00%
33.00%28.60%
14.70%
24.30%
22.90%
23.50%
14.40% 22.90%
38.20%
7.50% 4.80%5.90%
7.20% 8.60%8.80%
13.60% 12.40% 8.80%
40.20% 42.00%
14.30%
24.40%26.00%
57.10%
13.60%14.00%
28.60%6.80%
8.00%7.40%
6.00%7.80% 4.00%
33.00%23.20% 25.50%
24.30%35.50%
39.90%
7.20%5.60%
5.10%13.60% 9.90%4.00%
40.20%32.70% 34.90%
24.40%
26.10%26.90%
7.40%6.00%
5.00%7.80% 6.00% 3.40%
33.00%23.20%
13.50%
24.30%35.50%
16.30%
14.40%16.00%
13.50%
7.50%9.70%
13.50%
7.20%5.60%
7.70%
13.60% 9.90%
35.60%
40.20%32.70%
21.70%
24.40%
26.10%
21.70%
13.60% 22.90%
15.20%
6.80%6.30%
10.90%
7.40%6.00%
10.90%
7.80% 6.00%
19.60%
33.00%
18.30%13.70%
24.30%
18.30%
15.30%
14.40%
20.10%
21.00%
7.50%
12.70%16.10%
7.20%
13.90% 16.90%
13.60% 16.70% 16.90%
40.20%
27.00%21.50%
24.40%
16.90%
17.50%
13.60%
12.20%
6.80%
6.80%
5.10%
5.10%
7.40%
7.20%
7.90%
7.80%
31.60%41.20%
33.00%
18.30%
40.0%
24.30%
18.30%
26.00%
14.40%
20.10%
8.0%7.50%
12.70%
7.20%
13.90% 6.0%
13.60% 16.70% 20.0%
40.20%27.00%
46.00%
24.40%
16.90%
15.40%
13.60%
12.20%
30.80%6.80%
5.10%
7.40%
7.20%
7.70%7.80%
31.60%
33.00%
18.30% 20.0%
24.30%
18.30%
32.00%
14.40%
20.10%
36.0%
7.50%
12.70%
4.00%
7.20%
13.90%
13.60% 16.70%8.0%
40.20%
27.00%
41.20%
24.40%
16.90%
14.70%
13.60%
12.20%
26.50%
6.80%
5.10%
8.80%7.40%
7.20%
2.90%7.80%
31.60%
5.90%
33.00%37.10% 33.60%
24.30%
27.70%26.10%
7.20%
8.10%14.30%
13.60%
2.90% 2.50%
40.20%32.20%
18.60%
24.40%
29.00%
23.70%
7.40% 8.90%
25.40%
7.80% 6.10% 5.10%
33.00%37.10%
52.30%
24.30%
27.70%
38.50%
14.40%
18.70%
9.20%
7.50%
5.50%7.20%
8.10%13.60%
2.90%
40.20%32.20%
51.30%
24.40%
29.00%
17.90%
13.60%15.40%
12.80%
6.80% 8.40%
10.30%7.40% 8.90%
7.80% 6.10% 7.70%
33.00%37.10% 35.70%
24.30%
27.70% 28.60%
14.40%
18.70%
7.10%
7.50%
5.50%21.40%7.20%
8.10%13.60%
2.90%7.10%
40.20%32.20%
66.70%
24.40%
29.00%
33.30%
13.60%15.40%
6.80% 8.40%
7.40% 8.90%
7.80% 6.10%
33.00%37.10%
32.10%
24.30%
27.70%
23.20%
14.40%
18.70%
26.80%
7.50%
5.50% 6.30%7.20%
8.10% 7.10%13.60%
2.90% 4.50%
40.20%32.20% 31.90%
24.40%
29.00%35.40%
13.60%15.40%
13.30%
6.80% 8.40%9.70%
7.40% 8.90%3.50%
7.80% 6.10% 6.20%
33.00% 31.40% 30.90%
24.30%20.00%
37.00%
14.40%
13.10%
12.30%7.50%
7.20%
7.40%7.20%
10.10%
6.20%13.60%
18.10%
6.20%
40.20%
51.50%
20.60%
24.40%
27.20%
44.10%
13.60%
8.90%
23.50%6.80%
3.50% 2.90%7.40%4.00%
7.80% 5.00% 8.80%
33.00% 31.40%
52.20%
24.30%20.00%
15.20%
7.20%
10.10%
8.70%13.60%18.10%
4.30%
40.20%
51.50% 53.60%
24.40%
27.20%32.10%
7.40%4.00%
7.80% 5.00% 3.60%
33.00% 31.40% 28.20%
24.30%20.00%
15.90%
7.20%
10.10%
11.60%
13.60%18.10%
23.80%
40.20%
51.50%58.60%
24.40%
27.20%22.10%
7.40%4.00% 5.70%
7.80% 5.00% 4.30%
FY 2018Average Months - Team 14.4
Average Months - District 11.5Average Months - State 14.7
Time To Case Termination - Delinquency Offenses13
FY 2018 July 1, 2017-February 26, 2018: State, District/Team Comparisons
28 2016-2017 Data Reports
Probation SupervisionJuvenile probation in Nebraska may work with youth at many stages of their court case(s), not just youth who receive a disposition of probation. The data represented is derived from 3 different samples provided by the Administrative Office of Probation through the Cognos reporting environment as well as the YRTC annual report. They are the following:
Youth Placed in OHP for FY 16-176
This population of youth are those that had an admission to an out-of-home placement (OHP) between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017. Please note: there may be duplicate placements for youth on this list due to youth having a court case in more than one county.
Youth at YRTC FY16-17Data was provided by the Youth Rehabilitation & Treatment Centers in Nebraska through their annual report numbers. These include all admittances by Service Area and County for fiscal year 2016-2017. Only counties with data were includ-ed in this report.
Youth with Discharges FY16-177
Youth that had a court case discharged during the fiscal year are included in this analysis. This includes data of youth of all ages and from all counties. All types of discharges are included (completion of pre-adjudication [which is different than traditional probation], successful and unsuccessful discharges). If a youth had more than one court case discharged in a year, they will be included multiple times within the data set. Court cases that were ultimately dismissed are not in-cluded in this data set.
29The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Probation Supervision, continued
Out-of-Home Placements for FY 16-1714
This population of youth had an admission to an out-of-home placement (OHP) between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017.
Youth served by Juvenile Probation may be placed out-of-home for several reasons, including a court-ordered placement to receive services, a placement arranged by parents for treatment or care, or a placement related to a Department of Health and Human Services case. Juvenile Probation tracks all placements of youth who are under their supervision and out of home. This data is the number of placements by placement type for all youth out of home for the 2016-17 fiscal year.
Placements were categorized as one of the following: • Congregate non-treatment (Group Home A and B, Independent Living, Therapeutic Group Home) • Congregate treatment (Psychiatric Residential Treatment)• Crisis stabilization or shelter (Crisis Stabilization, Enhanced Shelter Care, Shelter Care)• Detention (Detention Secure, Detention Staff Secure)• Foster care/specialized homes (Developmental Disability Group Home, Developmental Disability Ex-
tended Family Home, Relative/Kinship, Respite Care)• Acute inpatient hospitalization and short-term residential (Acute Inpatient Hospitalization, Short-Term
Residential)• Jail • Missing from care (Runaway from Home, Runaway from Placement)
The tables in this report include the percent of each placement type which ended during the fiscal year and the median days the youth spent in those ended placements as well as the minimum days in placement and the maximum days in placement.
30 2016-2017 Data Reports
Probation Supervision, continued
State
Youth in Placement Days in PlacementTotal Median Minimum Maximum % Ended
Congregate non-treatment 1 184.00 184 184 100.0%
Congregate treatment 1 91.00 91 91 100.0%
Crisis Stabilization or Shelter 1 6.00 6 6 100.0%
Detention 3 17.00 8 41 100.0%Foster Care/Special-
ized Homes 2 148.00 71 225 100.0%
Acute inpatient Hos-pitalization and Short
Term Residential0 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Jail 0 n/a n/a n/a n/aMissing from care 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Out-of-Home Placements for FY 16-1714
This population of youth that had an admission to an out-of-home placement (OHP) between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017.
Youth in Placement Days in PlacementTotal Median Minimum Maximum % Ended
Congregate non-treatment 697 106 0 434 76.2%
Congregate treatment 314 92 0 467 90.1%
Crisis Stabilization or Shelter 849 25 0 247 99.8%
Detention 1858 18 0 300 99.5%Foster Care/Special-
ized Homes 425 71 0 458 87.3%
Acute inpatient Hos-pitalization and Short
Term Residential130 4.5 0 164 100.0%
Jail 291 112 0 358 76.0%Missing from care 579 15 0 364 95.7%
31The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
Probation Supervision, continued
Youth at YRTC FY16-1715
Data from Kearney and Geneva YRTC annual reports: Probation and courts placed 172 youth at YRTC facilities, 169 had a corresponding TEOC team and 4 youth were tribal youth. If team is not listed they did not have youth in the YRTC.
Team YRTC Location Total Youth in YRTC Team %Geneva Kearney
2.1 0 1 1 0.6%2.2 0 1 1 0.6%2.3 1 0 1 0.6%3 15 31 46 26.7%4 10 36 46 26.7%
5.1 1 0 1 0.6%5.2 1 5 6 3.5%6.1 0 5 5 2.9%6.2 0 4 4 2.3%7 1 12 13 7.6%
8.1 1 0 1 0.6%9.1 2 9 11 6.4%9.2 1 5 6 3.5%
10.1 0 2 2 1.2%10.3 0 1 1 0.6%11.1 1 2 3 1.7%11.2 1 0 1 0.6%11.3 0 1 1 0.6%11.4 3 11 14 8.1%12.3 1 3 4 2.3%
Tribal Youth 1 3 4 2.3%
32 2016-2017 Data Reports
Disposition54%
Investigation Only
22%
Post-Adjudication/Pre-Disposition
15%
Pre-Adjudication
6%
Pre-Sentence/Other3%
Nebraska Juvenile Probation Case Status Snapshot for 2017
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Disposition
Investigation Only
Post-Adjudication/Pre-Disposition
Pre-Adjudication
Pre-Sentence/Other
Nebraska Juvenile Probation Case Status Comparison by Year
2017 n=7033 2016 n=5498
Average Cases per Youth=1.2
69%
26%
5% n=3944Successfully Completed
UnsuccessfullyCompleted/Revoked
Other (Trans Adjudication,Death, District Override,Problem Solving Court,Straight Sentence)
Probation Supervision, continued
Team
State
Discharge by Team Team 2.1
Discharge by Team Team 2.2
Discharge by Team Team 2.3
Discharge by Team Team 3
Discharge by Team Team 5.1
Discharge by Team Team 5.2
Discharge by Team Team 5.3
Discharge by Team Team 6.1
Discharge by Team Team 6.2
Discharge by Team Team 8.2
Discharge by Team Team 8.3
Discharge by Team Team 9.1
Discharge by Team Team 9.2
Discharge by Team Team 10.1
Discharge by Team Team 10.2
Discharge by Team Team 10.3
Discharge by Team Team 11.1
Discharge by Team Team 11.4
Discharge by Team Team 12.1
Discharge by Team Team 12.2
Discharge by Team Team 12.3Discharge by Team Team 11.2
Discharge by Team Team 11.3Discharge by Team Team 8.1
Discharge by Team Team 7
Discharge by Team Team 1 Discharge by Team District 4
Successful59%
Unsuccessful35%
Other6% n=189
Successful66%
Unsuccessful28%
Other6%
n=50
Successful62%
Unsuccessful25%
Other13%
n=16
Successful73%
Unsuccessful13%
Other14%
n=178
Successful66%
Unsuccessful31%
Other3%
n=662
Successful68%
Unsuccessful30%
Other2%
n=803
Successful90%
Unsuccessful10%
n=89
Successful72%
Unsuccessful20%
Other8%
n=154
Successful69%
Unsuccessful22%
Other9%
n=58
Successful66%
Unsuccessful34%
n=116
Successful75%
Unsuccessful24%
Other1%
n=106
Successful72%
Unsuccessful19%
Other9%
n=193
Successful68%
Unsuccessful23%
Other9%
n=22
Successful69%
Unsuccessful22%
Other9%
n=23
Successful87%
Unsuccessful9%
Other4%
n=23
Successful82%
Unsuccessful15%
Other3%
n=322
n=90
Successful47%
Unsuccessful40%
Other13%
n=123
Successful57%
Unsuccessful29%
Other14%
n=123
Successful27%
Unsuccessful53%
Other20%
n=15
Successful71%
Unsuccessful28%
Other1%
n=149
Successful76%
Unsuccessful24%
n=29
Successful87%
Unsuccessful4% Other
9%
n=56
Successful74%
Unsuccessful24%
Other2%
n=132
Successful76%
Unsuccessful16%
Other8%
n=37
Successful88%
Unsuccessful9%
Other3%
n=33
Successful70%
Unsuccessful28%
Other2%
n=214
Successful55%
Unsuccessful34%
Other11%
Youth with Discharges FY16-1716
Youth that had a court case discharged during the fiscal year are included in this analysis. The charts show the breakdown of youth discharged from probation by court case discharge for the 2016-17 fiscal year by state and by team. Court cases that were dismissed are not included in the analysis.
33The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
11 years0%
12 years1%
13 years1%
14 years3%
15 years6%
16 years11%
17 years21%
18 years36%
19 years21%
Majority of Discharges are Older Youth, 17-18 Years Old
78%
n=3,944
Ave Age Discharge for StateProbation Supervision, continued
State
TeamAge at Discharge Total Percent14 years 4 18.2%15 years 2 9.1%16 years 1 4.5%17 years 1 4.5%18 years 5 22.7%19 years 9 40.9%
22
Average Age of Discharges FY16-1716
34 2016-2017 Data Reports
References1 Webber, T., Through the Eyes of a Child Team and District Nebraska State Map. (2017). Nebraska Court Improvement Project. Retrieved from: https://supremecourt.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/Programs/CIP/events/TEOC_District_Teams_Map_with_County_Seats.pdf
2 United States Census Bureau. (2017, December). [Poverty status in the past 12 months by sex by age]. Raw Data Table B1700, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
3 United States Census Bureau. (2017, December). [Under 19 Total Population and non-Hispanic White and Minority Populations: Nebraska and Its Counties 2012-2016 timeframe]. Raw Data tables B01001 and B01001H, 2012-2016 American Community Survey. Data pulled by: David Drozd, UNO Center for Public Affairs Research on December 7, 2017. 4 Fostering Court Improvement: Nebraska. (2018, January). Children Removed to Foster Care During October 2016 through September 2017. Retrieved from: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/
5 Fostering Court Improvement: Nebraska. (2018, January). Children in Foster Care During October 2016 through September 2017. Retrieved from: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/
6 Administrative Office of the Courts (2017, December). [JUSTICE: Child Welfare 3(a)] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.
7 Fostering Court Improvement: Nebraska. (2018, January). Children Discharged During October 2016 through September 2017. Retrieved from: http://fosteringcourtimprovement.org/ne/
8 Nebraska DHHS. (2018, January). Exits to Reunification in less than 12 Months - Entry Cohort. Retrieved from Children’s Outcomes Measured in Protection and Safety Statistics – COMPASS: http://dhhs.ne.gov/children_family_services/Pages/COMPASS.aspx
9 Nebraska Crime Commission. (2018, January). [2016, January through December, Juvenile (0-17 yrs.) Arrests across all counties, across all agencies, for all offenses]. Retrieved from: http://www.nebraska.gov/crime_commission/arrest/arrest.cgi
10 Nebraska Crime Commission. (2018, January). [2017 Diversion data – Kids Count to include all data from 2016] Data pulled by: Amy Hoffman, Nebraska Crime Commision on January 11, 2018.
11 Nebraska Crime Commission. (2018, January). 2016 Diversion Map. Provided by Amy Hoffman: https://ncc.nebraska.gov/juvenile-diversion
12 Administrative Office of the Courts & Probation. (2017, October). [Youth with Intake FY 16-17] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.
13 Administrative Office of the Courts (2017, February). [JUSTICE: Juvenile Justice Data] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.
14 Nebraska Administrative Office of the Courts & Probation. (2017, October). [Youth Placed in OHP for FY 16-17] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.
15 Division of Children & Family Services Office of Juvenile Services. Youth Rehabilitation & Treatment Center- Kearney and Geneva (2017). Retrieved: http://dhhs.ne.gov/Reports/Youth%20Rehabilitation%20and%20Treatment%20Center%20Kearney%20Annual%20Report%20-%202016-2017.pdf as well as http://dhhs.ne.gov/Reports/Youth%20Rehabilitation%20and%20Treatment%20Center%20Kearney%20Annual%20Report%20-%202016-2017.pdf
16 Nebraska Administrative Office of the Courts & Probation. (2017, October). [Youth with Discharges FY 16-17] Cognos: Raw Data July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017.
35The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
County Rankings by Youth Poverty Rate
Appendix
Rank of child
poverty rate
Team County
Total Children
under age 18 in poverty
Poverty rate (%)
for children under age 18
n/a Nebraska 75,250 16.41 6.2 Thurston County 1,042 42.72 1 Pawnee County 195 34.73 1 Richardson County 518 30.44 12.1 Sheridan County 365 30.05 10.2w Harlan County 229 29.36 8.1 Brown County 162 26.67 11.3 Hitchcock County 154 26.38 11.3 Furnas County 277 25.89 8.3 Sherman County 158 23.8
10 8.1 Blaine County 33 22.911 11.1 Dawson County 1,480 22.812 12.1 Box Butte County 632 22.513 11.2 Keith County 362 21.914 9.1 Hall County 3,527 21.815 7 Cuming County 466 21.416 6.2 Dakota County 1,275 21.317 12.3 Scotts Bluff County 1,841 20.818 12.3 Banner County 38 20.519 8.1 Keya Paha County 30 20.420 7 Knox County 409 20.021 1 Jefferson County 311 19.822 7 Madison County 1,686 19.623 4 Douglas County 26,942 19.524 12.1 Grant County 24 19.424 11.4 McPherson County 18 19.426 6.2 Dixon County 273 19.127 11.4 Hooker County 18 18.428 1 Thayer County 194 17.829 11.4 Logan County 34 17.630 10.2w Franklin County 100 17.431 10.3e Nuckolls County 140 17.032 12.1 Morrill County 193 16.933 11.3 Red Willow County 409 16.434 3 Lancaster County 11,178 16.335 11.4 Lincoln County 1,372 16.3
Rank of child
poverty rate
Team County
Total Children
under age 18 in poverty
Poverty rate (%)
for children under age 18
36 6.1 Dodge County 1,361 16.237 5.2 Colfax County 480 16.038 12.2 Deuel County 56 15.839 8.2 Valley County 145 15.640 11.2 Dundy County 56 15.441 11.4 Frontier County 79 15.342 6.2 Cedar County 320 15.143 2.2 Otoe County 555 15.044 9.2 Buffalo County 1,645 14.945 12.2 Cheyenne County 350 14.846 10.1c Adams County 1,061 14.847 10.3e Clay County 222 14.648 12.1 Sioux County 38 14.649 5.2 Saunders County 762 14.550 7 Antelope County 214 14.551 12.1 Dawes County 232 14.552 5.1 Hamilton County 315 14.453 1 Saline County 488 14.354 10.3e Fillmore County 152 13.855 1 Johnson County 134 13.756 8.2 Greeley County 80 13.757 1 Gage County 633 13.358 6.2 Washington County 647 13.359 11.2 Chase County 128 13.260 8.3 Custer County 319 12.961 1 Nemaha County 188 12.862 11.4 Thomas County 20 12.763 8.3 Loup County 13 12.464 10.1c Webster County 94 12.065 8.3 Howard County 178 11.966 5.2 Platte County 917 11.067 5.1 York County 328 10.668 12.2 Kimball County 89 10.669 6.2 Burt County 153 10.670 11.2 Perkins County 70 10.371 5.3 Nance County 84 10.3
36 2016-2017 Data Reports
Appendix, continued
Rank of child
poverty rate
Team County
Total Children
under age 18 in poverty
Poverty rate (%)
for children under age 18
72 8.2 Holt County 248 10.273 8.2 Boyd County 47 10.174 5.2 Butler County 195 10.175 10.2w Phelps County 221 10.076 5.1 Seward County 367 9.377 5.3 Polk County 106 8.878 5.3 Merrick County 145 8.779 11.1 Gosper County 36 8.580 2.3 Sarpy County 3,961 8.381 2.1 Cass County 505 8.282 7 Stanton County 127 8.183 10.2w Kearney County 124 8.084 5.3 Boone County 95 7.785 12.2 Garden County 28 7.686 7 Wayne County 131 7.287 7 Pierce County 109 6.388 8.2 Wheeler County 9 6.289 8.1 Cherry County 68 5.890 11.3 Hayes County 9 4.691 8.1 Rock County 10 4.492 8.2 Garfield County 17 4.393 11.2 Arthur County 1 0.7
37The Nebraska Court Improvement Project
38 2016-2017 Data Reports
Nebraska Court Improvement Project5001 Central Park Drive, Suite 200
Lincoln, NE 68504
(402) 471-2864