2016-2017 Biennial Request Campus Conversations

18
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities 2016-2017 Biennial Request Campus Conversations Spring 2014

description

2016-2017 Biennial Request Campus Conversations. Spring 2014. Goal of today’s discussion. Get your ideas about the FY2016-FY2017 biennial legislative request that the Board of Trustees will submit in November 2014. What is the biennial legislative request?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 2016-2017 Biennial Request Campus Conversations

Page 1: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator.

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

2016-2017 Biennial Request Campus Conversations

Spring 2014

Page 2: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

2

Goal of today’s discussion

Get your ideas about the FY2016-FY2017 biennial legislative request that the Board of Trustees will submit in November 2014

Page 3: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

3

What is the biennial legislative request? The Board of Trustees’ formal request to

the legislature for two years of state operating funds for the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

Page 4: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

4

How important is state support? State appropriation and student tuition are the two primary sources

of funding for colleges and universities The Legislature may also have a say in tuition rates State appropriation sets constraints on available resources for:

Compensation Program support and growth Student support services Technology and equipment Solutions to challenges campuses are trying to address New initiatives and investments New partnerships Innovations

Page 5: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

5

Some facts as background

Page 6: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

6

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities FY2013 General Fund– Revenues(in millions)

Tuition86557%

State Appropriation55337%

Other916%

Total = $1,509 M

Page 7: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

7

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities FY2013 General Fund Expense

(in millions)

Salaries and Fringe Benefits

$1,140 75%

Other37925%

Total = $1,519 M

Page 8: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

8

Tuition Trends

FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014* FY2015*0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

33.7%

44.7%47.4% 48.6%

55.2%60.1%

58.3% 57.6%

66.3%

55.3%52.6% 51.4%

44.8%39.9%

41.7% 42.4%

Higher tuition, cuts, reallocations, and salary freezes have made up for the loss of state support

Tuition Appropriation

Page 9: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

9

Total expenses per FYE MnSCU student

FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 $8,000

$8,500

$9,000

$9,500

$10,000

$10,500

$11,000

$11,500

$12,000

$12,500

$13,000

$10,483 $10,205

$10,421

$11,170

$11,583

$12,135 $12,286

$11,598 $11,648

$11,454

$12,222

$10,277 $10,249

$9,719 $9,599 $9,967 $10,052 $10,145

$10,313

$9,582 $9,325

$8,984

$9,445

Expenses per FYE have mostly declined or stayed constant when adjusted for inflation.

Expenses Per FYE Inflated Expenses Per FYE

Page 10: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

10

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities:Minnesota’s Most Affordable Higher Education Option

Carle

ton

Mac

alas

ter

St. O

laf

Gust

avus

St. B

ened

ictSt

. Joh

n's

St. T

hom

asHa

mlin

eAu

gsbu

rgCo

ncor

dia,

Moo

rhea

dM

pls A

rt &

Des

ign

St. C

athe

rine

Beth

elSt

. Sch

olas

tica

St. M

ary'

sNo

rthw

este

rnBe

than

yAr

t Ins

titut

es, M

NCr

own

Insti

tute

of P

rodu

ction

& R

ecor

ding

Dunw

oody

Conc

ordi

a, S

t. Pa

ulNo

rth

Cent

ral

MN

Scho

ol o

f Bus

ines

sGl

obe

Argo

sy, T

win

Citi

esDu

luth

Bus

ines

s Oa

k Hi

llsCr

ossr

oads

Cape

llaM

pls B

usin

ess C

olle

geW

alde

nU

of M

Tw

in C

ities

Rasm

usse

n Co

llege

U of

M R

oche

ster

U of

M D

ulut

hU

of M

Mor

risM

artin

Luth

erNW

Hea

lth S

cienc

esU

of M

Cro

okst

onSo

uthw

est M

N St

ate

MSU

Moo

rhea

dW

inon

a St

ate

Bem

idji

Stat

e M

SU, M

anka

toSt

. Clo

ud S

tate

M

etro

polit

an S

tate

An

oka

Tech

nica

lNo

rman

dale

CC

Dako

ta C

ount

y TC

MN

Stat

e -S

E Te

chni

cal

MN

Wes

t C&T

CRo

ches

ter C

&TC

Nort

hlan

d C&

TCRi

verla

nd C

CNo

rthw

est T

echn

ical

Nort

h He

nnep

in C

CCe

ntra

l Lak

es C

olle

geRi

dgew

ater

Col

lege

Alex

andr

ia T

&CC

Sout

h Ce

ntra

l Col

lege

Cent

ury

Colle

geM

N St

ate

C&TC

Rain

y Ri

ver C

CVe

rmill

ion

CCHi

bbin

g CC

Itasc

a CC

St. C

loud

T&C

CM

esab

i Ran

ge C

CIn

ver H

ills C

CFo

nd d

u La

c Trib

al&C

CSa

int P

aul C

olle

geHe

nnep

in T

echn

ical

Lake

Sup

erio

r Col

lege

Pine

Tec

hnica

lAn

oka-

Ram

sey

CC

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

$40,000

$45,000

$50,000

Most Expen-sive

Least Expensive

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

Private colleges and universities; University of Minnesota

College/University

2013

-14

Tuiti

on a

nd R

equi

red

Fees

Source: Chronicle of Higher Education, October 23, 2013

Page 11: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

11

Headcount enrollment growth 18%+

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013340,000

350,000

360,000

370,000

380,000

390,000

400,000

410,000

420,000

430,000

440,000

365,095369,374

372,880368,791

373,831

381,459389,545

423,190

433,554

420,918

431,342

435,625

Head

coun

t

Page 12: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

12

FYE enrollment grew rapidly but has fallen since its peak in 2011

Actual FY2003

Actual FY2004

Actual FY2005

Actual FY2006

Actual FY2007

Actual FY2008

Actual FY2009

Actual FY2010

Actual FY2011

Actual FY2012

Actual FY2013

Projected FY2014 (Feb 14)

Projected FY2015

(Feb 14)

Projected FY2016

(Feb 14)

125,000

130,000

135,000

140,000

145,000

150,000

155,000

160,000

132,586

135,819135,494

134,220135,839

139,885

143,924

155,422

157,903

153,447

149,905

144,759

143,451 143,551

FYE

Page 13: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

13

If tuition is frozen again in FY2016 and FY2017…

….an additional $142 million in state support will be required to cover modest increases in compensation and inflationary costs in the next biennium

Page 14: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

14

Additional resources needed in the next biennium to cover inflationary costs ( no new initiatives)

For example, 3% salary increases

(plus fringe benefits) = $106 million

For example, 3% inflationary increases

in operating costs = $ 36 million

Total required:

$142 million

Increase in resources needed for the

biennium

Page 15: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

15

Possible tuition and state support scenarios to cover inflationary increases (no new initiatives)

Biennial Yearly $ Increase in % increase

Total newstate support in tuitionresources

$142 million 0%$142 million

$118 million 1% ($ 24M)$142 million

$ 93 million 2% ($ 49M)$142 million

$ 68 million 3% ($ 74M)$142 million

$ 43 million 4% ($ 99M)$142 million

Page 16: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

16

What new investments might we ask the state to make in our colleges and universities?

For example: Affordability: investments to make higher education more

affordable Extraordinary Education: investments to provide faculty and

staff with the tools and resources they need to deliver an excellent education to our students

Student Success: investment to ensure student success, particularly among those who have been traditionally under-served by higher education

Page 17: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

17

continued….

Careers: investments that will better prepare more graduates with the skills and abilities required for the jobs and careers Minnesota needs to be globally competitive

Address current challenges: meet our commitment to serve communities across our state in light

of population shifts meet our commitment to serve communities that have traditionally

been underserved by higher education invest in new educational technologies

Page 18: 2016-2017 Biennial Request  Campus Conversations

18

2016-2017 proposed development timeline

March – May 2014: campus conversations March – May 2014: conversations with statewide faculty,

staff and student leadership groups Summer 2014: Review of ideas and suggestions Summer 2014: Leadership Council discussions Fall 2014: Broad discussion of draft proposal October/November 2014: Board consideration and adoption

of 2016-2017 biennial legislative request November 2014: Submission to the Executive Branch