2016 2016 BOT - csuohio.edu · 2016 BOT Book of Trends Cleveland State University 2016 Book of...

2016 BOT Book of Trends

Cle

vela

nd S

tate

Uni

vers

ity20

16 B

oo

k o

f Tre

nds

Affirmative Action StatementCleveland State University is committed to the principle of

equal opportunity in employment and education. No personat the university will be denied opportunity for employmentor education or be subject to discrimination in any project,

program, or activity because of race, color, religion, nationalorigin, sex, age, genetic information, sexual orientation,disability, disabled veteran, Vietnam-era veteran or other

protected veteran status.

Office of Academic PlanningPhone (216) 687-4700www.csuohio.edu/offices/planning

Marius Boboc Vice Provost for Academic PlanningLaurine Owens Administrative Coordinator

Office of Institutional Research and AnalysisPhone (216) 687-4700www.csuohio.edu/iraa

Thomas Geaghan Director

Eric Brown Senior Report DeveloperDeborah Geil Data Analyst/System DeveloperAndy White Data Analyst/System DeveloperTraci Worth Data Analyst/System DeveloperMichael McGoun Research AssistantPatricia Lyons Program Review Coordinator


Cleveland State University / 2016 Book of Trends2

Table of Contents

1Book of Trends

Sec

tio

n

1

Table of Contents

1Book of Trends

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION University Administration .............................................................................................................................................................3 Board of Trustees 2015-2016 ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Student Government Association Executive Board .............................................................................................................. 4 President’s Medal ............................................................................................................................................................................5 Distinguished Alumni ....................................................................................................................................................................5

2 CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND TRENDS Table 2.1: Cleveland State University Enrollment by Level, Fall 1965 – 2015 .............................................. 9 Table 2.2: Enrollment by College, Level and Load-Fall 2015 ............................................................................ 10 Table 2.3: Full-Time Enrollment by Ethnicity and Gender-Fall 2015 ............................................................. 11 Table 2.4: Total Enrollment by Ethnicity and Gender-Fall 2015 ..................................................................... 11 Table 2.5: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend.............. 12 Table 2.6: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College and Entrance Status: 5-Year Trend .......... 12 Table 2.7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend ..................................... 13 Table 2.8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend ................................. 13 Table 2.9: New Fall Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend ............................................................................... 13 Table 2.10: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours: 5-Year Trend ............................. 14 Table 2.11: Total Fall Enrollment by Academic Level: 5-Year Trend ............................................................... 15 Table 2.12: Fall Enrollment by College, 5-Year Trend ........................................................................................... 16 Table 2.13: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College, 5-Year Trend .......................................................... 16 Table 2.14: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level - Fall 2015 ...................................................................... 17 Table 2.15: Enrollment by Age Category - Fall 2015 ............................................................................................. 18 Table 2.16: Enrollment by Level and Residency Status - Fall 2015 ..................................................................... 19 Table 2.17: Enrollment by State - Fall 2015 .............................................................................................................. 19 Table 2.18: Enrollment by Ohio County - Fall 2015 .............................................................................................. 19 Map of 2015 Fall Enrollment by Ohio County ................................................................................................................... 20 Table 2.19: Non-Resident Alien Enrollment by Country or Region - Fall 2015.............................................. 21 Table 2.20: Spring Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend ...................................................................................... 22 Table 2.21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend ...................................................... 22 Table 2.22: Summer Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend .................................................................................. 23 Table 2.23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College, 5-Year Trend .................................................. 23 Table 2.24: Annualized Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend ............................................. 24 Table 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions, Fall 2011-2015 ............. 25 Table 2.26: Main Campus Enrollment for Select Ohio Four Year Institutions, Fall 2011-2015 .................. 25

3 ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES Tables 3.1-11: Fall Enrollment by Level and Major, 5-Year Trend ...................................................................... 29-41 Table 3.1: College of Business .................................................................................................................................... 29 Table 3.2: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences ......................................................................................... 31 Table 3.3: College of Education and Human Services ......................................................................................... 33 Table 3.4: School of Nursing ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Table 3.5: College of Engineering ............................................................................................................................. 37 Table 3.6: College of Sciences and Health Professions ........................................................................................ 38 Table 3.7: College of Urban Affairs .......................................................................................................................... 40 Table 3.8: College of Law ............................................................................................................................................ 41 Table 3.9: Undergraduate Studies .............................................................................................................................. 41 Table 3.10: Undergraduate Non-Degree .................................................................................................................... 42 Table 3.11: Graduate Studies ......................................................................................................................................... 42 Table 3.11a: Other ............................................................................................................................................................ 41 Tables 3.12-20: Fall Enrollment by Class Standing and Student Credit Hours by Course Level: 5-Year Trend .......................................................................................................... 43-50 Table 3.12: College of Business .................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 3.13: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences ......................................................................................... 44 Table 3.14: College of Education and Human Services ......................................................................................... 45 Table 3.15: School of Nursing ...................................................................................................................................... 46 Table 3.16: College of Engineering ..............................................................................................................................47 Table 3.17: College of Sciences and Health Professions ........................................................................................ 48 Table 3.18: College of Urban Affairs .......................................................................................................................... 49 Table 3.19: College of Law ............................................................................................................................................ 50 Table 3.20: Undergraduate Studies .............................................................................................................................. 51 Table 3.21: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Ethnicity: 5-Year Trend ............................................. 52 Table 3.22: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Ethnicity: 5-Year Trend ........................... 56 Table 3.23: CSU Graduate and Law Fall Enrollment by College and Ethnicity: 5-Year Trend .....................59 Table 3.24: Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend............................................. 62 Table 3.25: Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College and Load: 5-Year Trend ......................................... 63 East and West Centers and Off-Campus Locations ............................................................................................................ 64 Table 3.26: West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semester .............................................................................. 64 Table 3.26a: Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and Student Credit Hours Trend ............................ 64 Table 3.27a: Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Lorain County Community College .......... 65 Table 3.27b: Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Lakeland Community College .................... 66 Table 3.27c: Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Other Off-Campus Locations .................... 67

4 SPONSORED RESEARCH Table 4.1: Sponsored Program Awards and Expenditures, Fiscal Years 2010-2015 ...................................... 71 Table 4.2: Sponsored Program Awards by Source, Fiscal Years 2010-2015 .................................................... 72 Table 4.3: Sponsored Program Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Years 2010-2015 ......................................... 73 Table 4.4: National Science Foundation Ranking of Research and Development Expenditures, Fiscal Years 2009-2014 (Northern Ohio Comparison) ................ 74 Table 4.5a: National Science Foundation Ranking of Research Results, Fiscal Years 2012-2014 ................ 75 Table 4.5: Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Sponsored Program Expenditures by Year, Fiscal Years 2010-2015 ................................................................... 75 Table 4.6: Proposals Submitted and Awards Received by Source, Fiscal Years 2009-2015.......................... 76 Table 4.7: Proposals Submitted and Awards Received by College, Fiscal Years 2010-2015 ........................ 77 Table 4.7a: Fiscal Year 2015 Proposals Submitted by College .............................................................................. 77 Table 4.7b: Fiscal Year 2015 Awards Received by College ..................................................................................... 78 Table 4.8: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures, Fiscal Years 2010-2015 ........................................ 79 Table 4.9: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support from Externally Funded Research, Fiscal Years 2010-2015 ............................................................. 79 Table 4.10: Percentage of Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions-Main Campuses Only, Fall Terms 2011-2015................... 80 Table 4.11: Selected Research & Grant Highlights by College .............................................................................. 81 Table 4.12: Cleveland State University Research Centers and Institutes ............................................................. 96 Table 4.13: Past Recipients of Distinguished Faculty Awards by Award Type, 1995-2016 .............................97

5 RETENTION AND GRADUATION Table 5.1: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Ethnicity and Gender Enrolled Fall 2010-2014 / Returned Fall 2011-2015 ............................................... 101 Table 5.2: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by College Enrolled Fall 2010-2014/ Returned Fall 2011-2015 ......................................................... 102 Table 5.3: Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort) ............... 103 Table 5.4: Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort) .............. 103 Table 5.5a: Undergraduate First-Year, Full-Time Degree-Seeking Cohort Graduation Rate ..................... 104 Table 5.5b: Undergraduate First-Year, Full-Time Degree-Seeking Cohort Retention Rate ........................ 105 Table 5.6: Annual Degrees Awarded by Academic Level and Gender - University Total ......................... 106 Tables 5.7-14: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender ..................................................................... 106-116 Table 5.7: College of Business ................................................................................................................................. 106 Table 5.8: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences ...................................................................................... 108 Table 5.9: College of Education and Human Services ...................................................................................... 110 Table 5.10: College of Engineering .......................................................................................................................... 112 Table 5.11: School of Nursing ................................................................................................................................... 113 Table 5.12: College of Sciences and Health Professions ..................................................................................... 113 Table 5.13: College of Urban Affairs ....................................................................................................................... 115 Table 5.14: College of Law ......................................................................................................................................... 116 Table 5.15: Annual Degrees Awarded by Ethnicity and Gender ....................................................................... 117

6 SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: Academic and Administrative Programs Honors Program Table 6.1: Characteristics of New Honors Students Fall 2011-2015 ............................................................. 123 Table 6.2: Scholarship Aid for Honors Students by Financial Aid Year ........................................................ 123 Academic Characteristics Table 6.3: IPEDS Cohort Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 124 Table 6.3a: Average ACT Composite Scores by College for IPEDS Cohort Students ............................... 124 Table 6.3b: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Gender: 5 Year Trend .................................................................................. 125 Table 6.3c: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Ethnicity: 5 Year Trend ............................................................................... 125 Table 6.3d: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Age Group: 5 Year Trend ........................................................................... 125 Table 6.3e: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Selected Major: 5 Year Trend ..................................................................... 125 Table 6.3f: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Notable Student Groups: 5 Year Trend .................................................. 125 Table 6.4: Average High School GPA by College for IPEDS Cohort Students: 5 Year Trend ............... 126 Table 6.5: Undergraduate Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend .......................................................... 127 Table 6.6a: Fall 2015 Top 15 Majors by Academic Level .................................................................................... 128 Table 6.6b: Top 15 Departments by Academic Level .......................................................................................... 128 Table 6.7: Fall 2015 Top 15 Degree Seeking Programs with Highest Minority Student Enrollment by Level ............................................................................................... 129 Table 6.8: Fall 2015 Top 15 Degree Seeking Programs with Highest Female Student Enrollment by Level .................................................................................. 130 Table 6.9: Summer Class Section and Average Class Size by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend ........ 131 Table 6.10: Fall Class Section and Average Class Size by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend ......... 133 Table 6.11: Spring Class Section and Average Class Size by Time of Day and College: 5-Year Trend ......... 135 Table 6.12: Fall Undergraduate Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend, Fall 2011-2015 ................................................................................. 137 Table 6.13: Fall Graduate & Law Student FTE by College and Class Time: 5-Year Trend, Fall 2011-2015 ................................................................................. 137 Center for eLearning Table 6.14a: Annual Web Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends ................................................................... 138 Table 6.14b: 5-Year Trends in Web-Based Instructional Delivery Student Credit Hours Generated ......... 139 Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Instructional Delivery Table 6.15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video and Telecourse Delivery Student Credit Hours Generated ........................................................................................ 140 Table 6.16: Cleveland State University Michael Schwartz Library Collections and Instructional Media Services, FY 2015 ................................................................. 141 Table 6.17: Cleveland State University Michael Schwartz Library and Instructional Media Services Use Statistics ................................................................................ 142 Table 6.18: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2012-2015 ................................................... 142 Table 6.19: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics 2011-2015 ........................................................ 142

7 Faculty & Staff Table 7.1: Full-Time Employees by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC), Fall 2015 ......................... 147 Table 7.2: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Ethnicity, and SOC Category, Fall 2015 .............................. 148 Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees: Women and Minorities as a Percentage of Total by SOC Category, Fall 2015 ..................................................................... 152 Table 7.4: Total Employees by SOC Category, Fall 2015 .................................................................................. 154 Table 7.5: Full-Time Faculty by Rank and College, Fall 2015 ........................................................................... 155 Table 7.6: Full-Time Faculty by Gender and College, Fall 2015 ...................................................................... 155 Table 7.6a: Full-Time Faculty by College, Gender and Rank, Fall 2015 .......................................................... 156 Table 7.7: Full-Time Faculty by Highest Degree Attained, Fall 2015 ............................................................. 156 Table 7.8: Full-Time Tenured/Tenure-Track and Non-Tenure Track Faculty by College/Department: 5-Year Trend .................................................................... 157 Table 7.9: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH) Generated by Part-Time Faculty, Fall 2015 ........................................................................................ 159 Table 7.10: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Full-Time Faculty, Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fall 2011-2015 ........................................................................... 162 Table 7.11: Full-Time Faculty as a Percentage of Total Full-Time Employees, Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fall 2011-2015 ........................................................................... 162 Table 7.12: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Full-Time Faculty Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions Fiscal Years 2011-2015 ............................................................. 163 Table 7.13: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions Main Campuses Only Fall 2011-2015 ................................................................................................. 163

8 SELECTED ADMINISTRATIVE CENTERS, DEPARTMENTS & OFFICES Application, Admission, and Yield Table 8.1: University Totals Application Trends Unduplicated for Degree-Seeking Students, Fall 2011-2015 ................................................................................... 167 Table 8.1a: New First Year Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students, Fall 2011-2015 ................................................................................... 167 Table 8.1b: New Transfer Undergraduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students, Fall 2011-2015 ................................................................................... 167 Table 8.1c: New Law Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students, Fall 2010-2015 ........................... 167 Table 8.1d: New Graduate Application Trends for Degree-Seeking Students, Fall 2010-2015 .................. 167 Office of Advancement Table 8.2: CSU Foundation: 5 Year Endowment Growth by College/Division ......................................... 168 Table 8.3: CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving ........................................................ 169 Philanthropic Highlights: 2015-2016 .................................................................................................. 169 Athletics Department Table 8.4: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University by Enrollment ........................................................ 170 Table 8.5 Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University 4, 5 and 6 Year Graduation Rate .......................................................................................................... 170

Finance Table 8.6: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Other Changes, Fiscal Years 2011-2015 .............. 171 Table 8.7: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures, Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Main Campuses Only, Fiscal Years 2011-2015.................. 173 Table 8.8: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Funding Unit Expenditures Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Main Campuses Only, Fiscal Years 2011-2015.................. 173 Table 8.9: Scholarship and Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Main Campuses Only, Fiscal Years 2011-2015.................. 174 Financial Aid Table 8.10: Financial Aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status: Average Aid Package and Academic Year ............................. 174 Table 8.11: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-Time, First-Time, Degree-Seeking Undergraduate Students ......................................................................................................................... 175 Table 8.12: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students........................................................ 175 Table 8.13: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status & Average Aid Package .............................................................. 176 Table 8.14: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2011-2015 ............. 176 Table 8.15: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package .................................................................. 176 Table 8.16: Law Students Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid, Fall 2011-2015 ..................... 176 Table 8.17: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA) ...................................................................................... 177 Table 8.18: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate Tuition and Fees for Selected Main Campuses of Ohio, 4 Year Institutions, 2015-2016. ............................................ 177 Table 8.19: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public Title IV Postsecondary Institutions ........................ 178 Financial Aid Notes .................................................................................................................................................................. 178 Center for International Services and Programs (CISP) Table 8.20: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards, 1973–2016 ...................................................................................... 179 Table 8.21: Cleveland State University International Academic Initiatives ...................................................... 180 Table 8.22: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring) and Program Type ................................................................................. 181 Table 8.23: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring) and College .............................................................................................. 181 Table 8.24: Study Abroad Student Enrollment by Academic Year (Summer, Fall and Spring) and Course Level .................................................................................... 181 Table 8.25: Key International Links.......................................................................................................................... 182 Office of Space Management Table 8.26: Cleveland State University Fall 2015 Building Inventory ............................................................... 183 Accreditation ............................................................................................................................................... 184 List of College Acronyms & Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 185 Other Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... 185 Book of Trends 2015 .................................................................................................................................. 186

Diversity Index Continuing our commitment to recognize the diversity of our campus, this year we are providing a Diversity Index for readers of the Book of Trends. The Index gives page numbers for all tables and graphs relating to gender and ethnicity, so that readers can easily locate information about all aspects related to our campus’ diverse makeup.

2 CAMPUS ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND TRENDS Table 2.3: Full-Time Enrollment by Ethnicity and Gender-Fall 2015 .............................................................. 11 Table 2.4: Total Enrollment by Ethnicity and Gender-Fall 2015 ....................................................................... 11

3 ENROLLMENT CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS IN CSU COLLEGES Table 3.21: CSU Total Fall Enrollment by College and Ethnicity: 5-Year Trend .............................................. 51 Table 3.22: CSU Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College and Ethnicity: 5-Year Trend ............................ 55 Table 3.23: CSU Graduate and Law Fall Enrollment by College and Ethnicity: 5-Year Trend ..................... 58

5 RETENTION AND GRADUATION Table 5.1: Fall to Fall Retention Rates for IPEDS Cohort by Ethnicity and Gender Enrolled Fall 2010–2014 / Returned Fall 2011-2015 ................................................ 101 Table 5.6: Annual Degrees Awarded by Academic Level and Gender - University Total ........................... 106 Tables 5.7-14: Annual Degrees Awarded by Major and Gender ...................................................................... 106-116 Table 5.15: Annual Degrees Awarded by Ethnicity and Gender ......................................................................... 117

6 SELECTED STRATEGIC INDICATORS: Academic and Administrative Programs Table 6.3b: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Gender: 5 Year Trend .................................................................................... 125 Table 6.3c: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Ethnicity: 5 Year Trend ................................................................................. 125

7 Faculty & Staff Table 7.2: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Ethnicity, and SOC Category, Fall 2013–2015 .................... 148 Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees: Women and Minorities as a Percentage of Total by SOC Category, Fall 2013–2015 ........................................................................................................................................... 152 Table 7.6: Full-Time Faculty by Gender and College, Fall 2015 ........................................................................ 155 Table 7.6a: Full-Time Faculty by College, Gender and Rank, Fall 2015 ............................................................ 156 Table 7.10: Women and Minorities as a Percent of Full-Time Faculty, Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions, Fall 2011-2015 ............................................................................. 162


Introduction

1Book of Trends

Sec

tio

n

1

Introduction

1Book of Trends

3Section 1 - Introduction

SEC

TIO

N

1

University Administration

Ronald M. Berkman President

Jianping Zhu Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Aff airsStephanie Y. McHenry Vice President for Business Aff airs and FinanceCindy Skaruppa Vice President for Enrollment ServicesBerinthia R. LeVine Vice President for University Advancement and Executive Director of CSU Foundation, Inc.Byron P. White Vice President for University EngagementSonali B. Wilson General Counsel and Counsel to the Board of TrusteesWilliam J. Napier Senior Advisor to President and Secretary to the Board of Trustees

Jianping Zhu Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Aff airs

Jerzy T. Sawicki Vice President for ResearchLee Fisher Interim Dean, Cleveland Marshall College of LawMeredith Bond Dean, College of Sciences and Health ProfessionsRoland Anglin Dean, Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Aff airsAnette Karlsson Dean, Washkewicz College of EngineeringTimothy Gaspar Dean, School of NursingRichard Reed Interim Dean, Monte Ahuja College of Business AdministrationGregory M. Sadlek Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Social SciencesSajit Zachariah Dean, College of Education and Human ServicesElizabeth A. Lehfeldt Dean, Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel Honors CollegeDonna Schultheiss Interim Dean, College of Graduate StudiesMarius Boboc Vice Provost for Academic PlanningEdgar Jackson Special Assistant to the President for Health Aff airsPeter Meiksins Vice Provost for Academic ProgramsGlenda Th ornton Director, Michael Schwartz LibraryBoyd Yarbrough Vice President for Student Aff airsWilliam R. Morgan Vice Provost for Faculty Aff airs


Trustee Term

Bernardo “Bernie” F. Moreno June 1, 2011 May 1, 2018Chairperson

Morton Q. Levin August 14, 2008 May 1, 2017Vice Chairperson

Stephen F. Kirk July 16, 2015 May 1, 2023Treasurer

Thomas W. Adler May 2, 2013 May 1, 2022Development Officer

Todd C. Davidson, Ed.D., M.Div. May 31, 2016 May 1, 2025Dan T. Moore III May 27, 2011 May 1, 2020David H. Gunning II, Esq. September 13, 2012 May 1, 2021June E. Taylor May 14, 2015 May 1, 2024Deborah A. Vesy June 21, 2016 May 1, 2019Paul T. All August 1, 2015 May 1, 2017Student Trustee

Sierra G. Davidson July 7, 2016 May 1, 2018Student Trustee

Robyn Gordon September 30, 2016 June 30, 2018Community Board Member

Len Komoroski September 30, 2016 June 30, 2018Community Board Member

Nancy W. McCann June 2, 2015 End of term as CSU Foundation ChairCommunity Board Member

Linda McHugh September 30, 2016 June 30, 2018Community Board Member

David Reynolds September 30, 2016 June 30, 2018Community Board Member

Joseph D. Roman September 30, 2016 June 30, 2018Community Board Member

Mark Holtzblatt, Ph.D. July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017Faculty Representative

Nigamanth Sridhar, Ph.D. September 10, 2014 August 31, 2016Faculty Representative

William J. Napier, Ph.D., Secretary to the Board of Trustees

Executive Member Position

Malek Khawam President

Tyler Wilson Vice President

Olga Grech Secretary

Board of Trustees 2016-2017

Student Government Association Executive Board 2016-2017Executive Member Position

Harinder Singh Treasurer

Jamie Johnston Advisor

5Section 1 - Introduction

Sec

tio

n

1

Distinguished Alumni AwardAnnually, outstanding graduates of Cleveland State University are honored for their service, leadership and career achievements with a Distinguished Alumni Award.

2013 Honorees

Louis Stokes George B. Davis Award

Joseph C. Krysh Monte Ahuja College of Business

Dr. Robert A. Mengerink Jr. College of Education and Human Services

Rebecca A. Bompiedi Fenn College of Engineering

Teresa K. Demchak Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Thomas F. O’Toole College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

John C. Vitullo College of Sciences and Health Professions

Susan L. Collier School of Nursing

Nickie J. Antonio Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs

2014 Honorees

Anthony S. Bakale George B. Davis Award

Andrew Jackson Monte Ahuja College of Business

Murray Winland College of Education and Human Services

Kenneth P. Jayjack Washkewicz College of Engineering

Elizabeth Pugh Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Richard Janus College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Cynthia Struk School of Nursing

Paul J. Gemperline College of Sciences and Health Professions

Sam McNulty Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs

2015 Honorees

Timothy J. Cosgrove George B. Davis Award

Daria Roebuck Monte Ahuja College of Business

Peter Lilienthal College of Education and Human Services

Anthony Colnar Washkewicz College of Engineering

Michael Gibbons Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Wayne Zachary College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Jo Manette Nousak College of Sciences and Health Professions

Brant Russell School of Nursing

Floun’say Caver Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs

Bruno Biasiotta Athletics

President’s MedalThe most prestigious non-academic recognition that Cleveland State University can confer, the President’s Medal, is awarded to individuals, groups or entities whose commitment and dedication to the University are beyond question. The medal is conferred only when the honoree has made continuing and/or extraordinary contributions, or has provided exemplary and ongoing services that have directly and tangibly advanced the best interests and mission of Cleveland State University. The first President’s Medal was presented in November 2004.

Year Recipients

2016 Steven Minter

2015 Albert B. Ratner

2014 Eric S. Gordon

2013 Jennie Jones Trevor Jones

2012 Donald E. Washkewicz

2011 Monte Ahuja Dr. Usha Ahuja Ronald E. Weinberg

2010 Anand “Bill” Julka Dr. Neeraj Julka

Year Recipients

2009 Mrs. Jean L. Elsner

2008 Natalie Epstein Lainie Hadden

2007 Art J. Falco

2006 James D. Ireland lll Dr. William Hiller

2005 Dr. Julian M. Earls Maria Miller Babs Glickman

2004 Dr. Delos M. (Toby) CosgrovePresident’s Medal

2016 Honorees

Annette G. Butler George B. Davis Award

David J. Fornari Monte Ahuja College of Business

Zachary G. Green College of Education and Human Services

James D. Heckelman Fenn College of Engineering

Kenneth C. Ricci Cleveland-Marshall College of Law

Bonnie E. Raquet College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Ann M. Frangos College of Sciences and Health Professions

Susan L. Tullai-McGuinness School of Nursing

Grace Gallucci Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs

Krista G. Freeman Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel Honors College

Sec

tio

n

2

Campus Enrollment Characteristics & Trends

2Book of Trends

9Section 2 - Campus Enrollment Characteristics & Trends

Sec

tio

n

2

5,00

0

10,0

00

15,0

00

20,0

00

25,0

00

1965

1966

1967

1968

1969

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Enrollment

2011

Tabl

e 2.

1: C

leve

land

Sta

te U

nive

rsit

y En

rollm

ent

by L

evel

- F

all 1

965

- 20

15

Figu

re 2

.1: C

leve

land

Sta

te U

nive

rsit

y En

rollm

ent T

rend

- F

all 1

965

- 20

15

2012

2013

2014

2015

Yea

r Un

derg

radu

ate

Grad

uate

La

w

Tota

l Ye

ar

Unde

rgra

duat

e Gr

adua

te

Law

To

tal

1965

6

,026

N

/A

N/A

6

,026

19

90

13,

825

4

,331

1

,064

1

9,22

0 19

66

7,8

53

N/A

N

/A

7,8

53

1991

1

3,53

1

4,5

00

1,0

60

19,

091

1967

8

,431

1

84

N/A

8

,615

19

92

12,

716

4

,504

9

79

18,

199

1968

8

,836

2

48

N/A

9

,084

19

93

11,

966

4

,240

9

31

17,

137

1969

9

,442

1

,220

7

75

11,

437

19

94

11,

341

4

,251

9

12

16,

504

1970

1

0,73

4

1,1

71

742

1

2,64

7

1995

1

0,69

8

4,0

65

908

1

5,67

1 19

71

11,

257

1

,760

7

72

13,

789

19

96

10,

728

3

,905

8

89

15,

522

1972

1

1,75

8

2,0

45

909

1

4,71

2

1997

1

0,67

5

4,1

54

906

1

5,73

5 19

73

11,

986

2

,212

1

,003

1

5,20

1

1998

1

1,21

5

4,2

44

867

1

6,32

6 19

74

12,

895

2

,300

1

,066

1

6,26

1

1999

1

0,45

3

4,4

80

749

1

5,68

2 19

75

13,

278

2

,568

1

,128

1

6,97

4

2000

1

0,26

0

4,6

58

762

1

5,68

0 19

76

13,

401

2

,808

1

,138

1

7,34

7

2001

1

0,50

7

4,7

74

834

1

6,11

5 19

77

13,

896

2

,851

1

,168

1

7,91

5

2002

1

0,40

5

4,9

41

817

1

6,16

3 19

78

13,

143

3

,125

1

,164

1

7,43

2

2003

1

0,30

0

5,2

62

815

1

6,37

7 19

79

13,

154

3

,242

1

,184

1

7,58

0

2004

9

,870

5

,259

7

52

15,

881

1980

1

4,33

0

3,7

51

1,1

69

19,

250

20

05

9,6

05

5,1

97

748

1

5,55

0 19

81

14,

167

3

,883

1

,090

1

9,14

0

2006

9

,525

4

,905

7

12

15,

142

1982

1

4,17

7

3,7

15

1,0

52

18,

944

20

07

9,7

98

4,8

73

712

1

5,38

3 19

83

14,

195

3

,768

9

79

18,

942

20

08

9,8

25

4,9

42

672

1

5,43

9 19

84

13,

426

3

,589

1

,018

1

8,03

3

2009

1

0,70

8

5,1

53

645

1

6,50

6 19

85

12,

502

3

,347

9

17

16,

766

20

10

11,

496

5

,280

6

10

17,

386

1986

1

3,22

0

4,0

05

1,0

16

18,

241

20

11

11,

722

5

,162

5

63

17,

447

1987

1

3,23

6

3,9

45

1,0

06

18,

187

20

12

12,

039

4

,985

5

01

17,

525

1988

1

2,97

1

3,8

50

1,0

00

17,

821

20

13

12,

359

4

,902

4

69

17,

730

1989

1

3,40

9

4,1

15

1,0

11

18,

535

20

14

12,

218

4

,685

4

42

17,

345

2015

1

2,44

6

4,39

5 42

8 17

,269

No

te: C

SU

sw

itche

d fro

m q

uart

er to

sem

este

r te

rms

in 1

998.

No

te: P

rior

to 2

000

enro

llmen

t figu

res

repr

esen

ted

open

ing

cens

us.

Sin

ce 2

000

enro

llmen

t figu

res

repr

esen

t clo

sing

cen

sus.


Tabl

e 2.

2: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

, Lev

el a

nd L

oad

- Fa

ll 20

15

Figu

re 2

.2a:

Enr

ollm

ent

by L

evel

Fa

ll 20

15Fi

gure

2.2

b: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Loa

d an

d Le

vel

Fa

ll 20

15

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Grad

uate

& L

aw

Tota

l

Un

derg

radu

ate

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Gr

adua

te &

Gr

adua

te &

Colle

ge

Full-

Tim

e Pa

rt-T

ime

Tota

l %

of T

otal

Fu

ll-Ti

me

Part

-Tim

e L

aw T

otal

La

w %

of T

otal

Fu

ll-Ti

me

Part

-Tim

e To

tal

% o

f Tot

al

Busi

ness

1

,593

4

85

2,0

78

17%

3

14

617

9

31

19%

1

,907

1

,102

3

,009

17

%CL

ASS

1,9

24

574

2

,498

20

%

266

2

15

481

10

%

2,1

90

789

2

,979

17

%Ed

ucat

ion

566

2

45

811

7%

3

07

834

1

,141

24

%

873

1

,079

1

,952

11

%Nu

rsin

g 4

57

82

5

39

4%

7

43

5

0

1%

464

1

25

589

3%

Engi

neer

ing

1,4

72

337

1

,809

15

%

479

2

39

718

15

%

1,9

51

576

2

,527

15

%Sc

ienc

e 2

,266

6

03

2,8

69

23%

5

95

225

8

20

17%

2

,861

8

28

3,6

89

21%

Urba

n Af

fairs

2

21

201

4

22

3%

54

1

77

231

5%

2

75

378

6

53

4%La

w

-

-

-

0%

247

1

81

428

9%

2

47

181

4

28

2%Un

derg

radu

ate

Stud

ies

612

4

82

1,0

94

9%

-

-

-

0%

612

4

82

1,0

94

6%Un

derg

radu

ate

Non-

Degr

ee

24

1

85

209

2%

-

-

-

0%

2

4

185

2

09

1%Gr

adua

te S

tudi

es

-

-

-

0%

-

23

2

3

0%

-

23

2

3

0%Ot

her1

-

117

1

17

1%

-

-

-

0%

-

117

1

17

1%To

tal

9,1

35

3,3

11

12,

446

10

0%

2,2

69

2,5

54

4,8

23

100%

1

1,40

4

5,8

65

17,

269

10

0%

No

te: U

nder

grad

uate

full-

time

stat

us: m

inim

um o

f 12

hour

s; G

rad

uate

full-

time

stat

us: m

inim

um o

f 9 h

ours

; Law

full-

time

stat

us: m

inim

um o

f 13

hour

s.

1 O

ther

incl

udes

stu

den

ts e

nrol

led

in A

ir Fo

rce,

Car

eer

Ser

vice

s, E

nglis

h as

a S

econ

d L

angu

age,

Mili

tary

Sci

ence

, Sp

ecia

l pro

gram

and

Stu

dy

Ab

road

.


Sec

tio

n

2

No

te: U

nder

gra

dua

te f

ull-

tim

e st

atus

: min

imum

of 1

2 ho

urs

G

rad

uate

ful

l-ti

me

stat

us: m

inim

um o

f 9 h

ours

Law

ful

l-ti

me

stat

us: m

inim

um o

f 13

hour

s

Figu

re 2

.4a:

Tot

al E

nrol

lmen

t by

Eth

nici

ty

Fall

2015

Figu

re 2

.4b:

Tot

al E

nrol

lmen

t by

Gen

der

Fa

ll 20

15

Full-

Tim

e St

uden

tsAm

eric

an In

dian

/Al

aska

Nat

ive

Asia

nBl

ack/

Afric

an

Amer

ican

Hi

span

ic/

Latin

oW

hite

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

er

Two

or m

ore

race

s No

n Re

side

nt

Alie

n

Unkn

own

To

tal

Gra

nd

Tota

l

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Tabl

e 2.

3: F

ull-

Tim

e En

rollm

ent

by E

thni

city

and

Gen

der

- Fa

ll 20

15

Unde

rgra

duat

e 1

3

13

1

62

130

4

82

927

2

19

264

2

,819

3

,044

4

9

1

23

193

4

78

117

7

3

65

4

,373

4

,762

9

,135

Gr

adua

te

-

-

13

3

1

49

1

70

16

3

3

286

5

69

-

-

2

16

4

76

237

6

1

3

848

1

,069

1

,917

Fi

rst P

rofe

ssio

nal

1

1

5

2

5

5

7

9

151

1

44

-

-

5

5

-

2

10

-

1

84

168

3

52

Tota

l Ful

l-Ti

me

14

1

4

180

1

63

536

1

,102

2

42

306

3

,256

3

,757

4

9

1

30

214

9

54

356

8

9

78

5

,405

5

,999

1

1,40

4

Tabl

e 2.

4: T

otal

Enr

ollm

ent

by E

thni

city

and

Gen

der

- Fa

ll 20

15

Unde

rgra

duat

e 1

5

18

2

28

180

7

17

1,4

21

279

3

40

3,7

63

4,0

12

6

12

1

52

233

5

88

158

1

65

159

5

,913

6

,533

1

2,44

6 Gr

adua

te

1

2

49

6

3

164

5

37

49

7

7

899

1

,399

-

2

2

1

38

5

72

322

4

8

47

1

,803

2

,487

4

,290

Fi

rst P

rofe

ssio

nal

1

1

6

5

15

2

5

9

15

2

01

218

-

-

6

6

3

4

1

3

5

254

2

79

533

Gr

and

Tota

l 1

7

21

2

83

248

8

96

1,9

83

337

4

32

4,8

63

5,6

29

6

14

1

79

277

1

,163

4

84

226

2

11

7,9

70

9,2

99

17,

269

Tota

l St

uden

tsAm

eric

an In

dian

/Al

aska

Nat

ive

Asia

nBl

ack/

Afric

an

Amer

ican

Hi

span

ic/

Latin

oW

hite

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

er

Two

or m

ore

race

s No

n Re

side

nt

Alie

n

Unkn

own

To

tal

Gra

nd

Tota

l

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e F

emal

eM

ale

Fem

ale


Tabl

e 2.

5: N

ew U

nder

grad

uate

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by C

olle

ge a

nd E

ntra

nce

Stat

us: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fr

eshm

en

Tran

sfer

s Ot

her U

nder

grad

uate

Ne

w U

nder

grad

uate

Tot

al

Tota

l Per

cent

Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1-Ye

ar

5-Ye

ar

Busi

ness

1

59

196

2

43

234

2

32

318

3

24

323

3

49

294

1

6

24

2

1

11

3

493

5

44

587

5

94

529

-

11%

7%

CLAS

S 4

88

464

5

20

434

2

93

417

4

66

449

3

39

322

2

3

37

2

4

12

1

6

9

28

967

9

93

785

6

31

-20

%

-32%

Educ

atio

n 9

0

70

9

7

56

8

7

111

1

13

129

1

03

115

2

6

21

3

0

31

1

6

2

27

204

2

56

190

2

18

15

%

-4%

Nurs

ing

83

1

19

135

1

23

146

63

6

0

38

3

8

35

8

4

1

0

8

13

154

1

83

183

1

69

194

15%

26

%En

gine

erin

g 1

57

215

2

25

226

2

87

109

1

37

147

1

43

181

7

1

5

19

8

1

5

2

73

367

3

91

377

4

83

28

%

77%

Scie

nce

327

4

06

421

3

61

454

3

97

407

4

42

354

3

54

81

12

5

97

7

7

97

805

9

38

960

7

92

905

14%

12

%Ur

ban

Affa

irs

13

9

8

1

4

7

6

8

65

5

8

81

9

7

- 2

4

2

1

81

7

6

70

9

7

105

8%

30%

Unde

rgra

duat

e St

udie

s 7

6

110

1

04

143

3

41

5

2

74

7

2

111

1

30

176

2

34

259

2

60

196

304

4

18

435

5

14

667

30%

11

9%Un

derg

radu

ate

Non-

Degr

ee

- -

- -

-

- -

- -

-

121

1

29

114

8

8

127

121

1

29

114

8

8

127

44%

5%

Othe

r1 -

- -

- 1

- -

- -

-

87

8

3

58

8

6

51

87

8

3

58

8

6

52

-

40%

-4

0%UN

IVER

SITY

1

,393

1,5

89 1

,753

1,

591

1,8

48

1,5

35 1

,646

1,6

58

1,51

8 1

,528

5

45

674

6

36

583

5

35

3,

473

3,

909

4,

047

3,

692

3,

911

6%

13%

Tabl

e 2.

6: N

ew G

radu

ate

& L

aw F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

and

Ent

ranc

e St

atus

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

M

aste

r’s/L

aw

Do

ctor

al

Ot

her G

radu

ate

New

Gra

duat

e/La

w T

otal

Tot

al P

erce

nt C

hang

e

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1-Ye

ar

5-Ye

ar

Busi

ness

3

06

337

2

96

307

2

01

-

- 1

0

- -

105

9

9

69

4

4

37

411

4

36

375

3

51

238

-

32%

-4

2%CL

ASS

145

1

58

122

1

56

125

- -

- -

- 51

3

7

52

3

2

25

196

1

95

174

1

88

150

-

20%

-2

3%Ed

ucat

ion

243

2

79

243

2

62

272

3

6

8

7

6 82

5

8

59

5

1

47

328

3

43

310

3

20

325

2%

-1%

Nurs

ing

20

1

6

19

2

3

18

- -

- -

- 2

3

3

3

2

22

1

9

22

2

6

20

-

23%

-9

%En

gine

erin

g 9

4

94

1

44

134

2

44

6

6

7

1

0 11

13

7

3

8

5

113

1

07

154

1

52

260

71%

13

0%Sc

ienc

e 1

90

187

1

76

194

1

91

1

6

17

1

9

13

9

40

36

3

5

37

3

7

2

46

240

2

30

244

2

37

-3

%

-4%

Urba

n Af

fairs

4

4

48

3

2

45

4

2

7

2

2

4

1

31

1

6

34

2

3

25

82

6

6

68

7

2

68

-6%

-1

7%La

w

164

1

39

135

1

43

109

- -

- -

- 7

7

2

5

24

2

4

1

71

146

1

60

167

1

33

-20

%

-22%

Grad

uate

Stu

dies

* -

- -

- -

-

- -

- -

10

6

22

1

2

13

10

6

2

2

12

1

3

8%

30

%UN

IVER

SITY

1

,206

1,2

58 1

,167

1,

264

1,2

02

3

2

31

4

6

34

27

341

26

9

302

2

34

215

1,57

9

1,55

8

1,51

5

1,53

2

1,44

4

-6

%

-9%

1 O

ther

Gra

duat

e in

clud

es s

tude

nts

enro

lled

in n

on-d

egre

e co

urse

s an

d tr

ansf

ers.

Par

t-tim

e ne

w M

aste

rs a

nd D

octo

ral s

tude

nts

are

also

und

er O

ther

Gra

duat

e no

w.

* See

Not

e be

low

.

NOTE

: In

prio

r edi

tions

of t

he B

ook

of T

rend

s mul

tiple

met

hodo

logi

es w

ere

used

to c

ount

new

gra

duat

e stu

dent

s in

the

diffe

rent

yea

rs w

ithin

the

sam

e ta

ble.

This

year

, we

have

cho

sen

one

met

hodo

logy

an

d ha

ve a

pplie

d to

the

entir

e ta

ble.

Spe

cific

ally,

stud

ents

are

mar

ked

as “n

ew”

durin

g th

eir fi

rst y

ear a

t the

gra

duat

e le

vel.

New

stud

ents

purs

uing

a M

aste

r’s d

egre

e, a

Law

deg

ree,

or a

Lic

ensu

re d

egre

e ar

e in

clud

ed in

the

first

sect

ion

of th

e ta

ble.

Firs

t-tim

e gr

adua

te st

uden

ts w

ho a

re p

ursu

ing

a D

octo

ral d

egre

e ar

e in

clud

ed in

the

seco

nd se

ctio

n of

the

tabl

e. A

ll ot

her n

ew g

radu

ate

stude

nts,

incl

udin

g no

n-de

gree

and

gra

duat

e tr

ansfe

r stu

dent

s, ar

e in

clud

ed in

the

“oth

er”

cate

gory

. Th

is m

etho

dolo

gy m

irror

s the

rule

s use

d by

the

Ohi

o Bo

ard

of R

egen

ts. S

peci

fical

ly, th

e Re

gent

s req

uire

that

a g

radu

ate

stude

nt b

e re

port

ed a

s “ne

w”

only

onc

e an

d on

ly in

the

first

sem

este

r the

y ar

e co

nsid

ered

a g

radu

ate

leve

l stu

dent

.


Sec

tio

n

2

Table 2.7: New Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend % Change in % Change in Full-Time Full-Time Part-Time Part-Time

College 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-Year 5-Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-Year 5-Year

Business 389 407 482 480 434 -10% 12% 104 137 105 114 95 -17% -9%CLASS 803 821 864 700 538 -23% -33% 125 146 129 85 93 9% -26%Education 188 179 202 145 167 15% -11% 39 25 54 45 51 13% 31%Nursing 134 164 169 145 162 12% 21% 20 19 14 24 32 33% 60%Engineering 236 311 314 338 440 30% 86% 37 56 77 39 43 10% 16%Science 657 764 790 656 779 19% 19% 148 174 170 136 126 -7% -15%Urban Affairs 57 57 48 51 55 8% -4% 24 19 22 46 50 9% 108%Undergraduate Studies 155 207 202 233 460 97% 197% 149 211 233 281 207 -26% 39%Undergraduate Non-Degree2 16 19 12 9 21 133% 31% 105 110 102 79 106 34% 1%Other1 - - - - - - - 87 83 58 86 52 -40% -40%Total New Undergraduate 2,635 2,929 3,083 2,757 3,056 11% 16% 838 980 964 935 855 -9% 2%

Table 2.8: New Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by Academic Load: 5-Year Trend % Change in % Change in Full-Time Full-Time Part-Time Part-Time

College 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-Year 5-Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-Year 5-Year

Business 178 209 153 158 122 -23% -31% 233 227 222 193 116 -40% -50%CLASS 79 88 77 115 88 -23% 11% 117 107 97 73 62 -15% -47%Education 95 102 127 108 129 19% 36% 233 241 183 212 196 -8% -16%Nursing 2 9 13 10 7 -30% 250% 20 10 9 16 13 -19% -35%Engineering 30 29 32 38 225 492% 650% 83 78 122 114 35 -69% -58%Science 142 137 138 149 179 20% 26% 104 103 92 95 58 -39% -44%Urban Affairs 30 24 16 16 21 31% -30% 52 42 52 56 47 -16% -10%Law 131 109 114 117 74 -37% -44% 40 37 46 50 59 18% 48%Graduate Studies2 - 1 - - - - - 10 5 22 12 13 8% 30%

Total New Graduate & Law 687 708 670 711 845 19% 23% 892 850 845 821 599 -27% -33%

Table 2.9: New Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend Percent Change

College 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-Year 5-Year

Business 904 980 962 945 767 -19% -15%CLASS 1,124 1,162 1,167 973 781 -20% -31%Education 555 547 566 510 543 6% -2%Nursing 176 202 205 195 214 10% 22%Engineering 386 474 545 529 743 40% 92%Science 1,051 1,178 1,190 1,036 1,142 10% 9%Urban Affairs 163 142 138 169 173 2% 6%Law 171 146 160 167 133 -20% -22%Undergraduate Studies 304 418 435 514 667 30% 119%Undergraduate Non-Degree2 121 129 114 88 127 44% 5%Graduate Studies 10 6 22 12 13 8% 30%Other1 87 83 58 86 52 -40% -40%Total New Students 5,052 5,467 5,562 5,224 5,355 3% 6%

Undergraduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 12 hours.Graduate full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 9 hours.Law full-time status: Any student registered for a minimum of 13 hours.

1 Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.

2 Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to the reclassification of academic plans.


Tabl

e 2.

10: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Cla

ss S

tand

ing

and

Stud

ent

Cre

dit

Hou

rs: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Tabl

e 2.

10a:

ENR

OLLM

ENT

BY C

LASS

STA

NDIN

G

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

2011

%

20

12

%

2013

%

20

14

%

2015

%

1-

Year

5-

Year

Fres

hmen

2

,988

17

%

3,1

75

18%

3

,356

19

%

3,1

56

18%

3

,329

19

%

5%

11%

Soph

omor

es

1,7

64

10%

1

,830

10

%

1,9

37

11%

2

,011

12

%

1,9

63

11%

-2

%

11%

Juni

ors

2,1

98

13%

2

,300

13

%

2,4

10

14%

2

,447

14

%

2,5

33

15%

4%

15

%Se

nior

s 4

,772

27

%

4,7

34

27%

4

,656

26

%

4,6

04

27%

4

,621

27

%

0%

-3%

Mas

ters

4

,676

27

%

4,5

01

26%

4

,393

25

%

4,2

04

24%

3

,947

23

%

-6%

-1

6%Do

ctor

al

486

3%

4

84

3%

509

3%

4

81

3%

448

3%

-7

%

-8%

Law

5

63

3%

501

3%

4

69

3%

442

3%

4

28

2%

-3%

-2

4%To

tal

17,

447

10

0%

17,

525

10

0%

17,

730

10

0%

17,

345

10

0%

17,

269

10

0%

0%

-1%

Tabl

e 2.

10b:

STU

DENT

CRE

DIT

HOUR

S BY

COU

RSE

LEVE

L

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

2011

%

20

12

%

2013

%

20

14

%

2015

%

1-

Year

5-

Year

Deve

lopm

enta

l 2

,986

2%

2

,690

1%

2

,898

1%

1

,855

1%

1

,783

1%

-4

%

-40%

Low

er

79

,157

42

%

83,

554

43

%

89,

337

45

%

85,

361

45

%

89,

544

46

%

5%

13%

Uppe

r

61,3

16

32%

6

2,18

0

32%

6

3,33

8

32%

5

8,89

9

31%

6

3,40

7

33%

8%

3%

Mas

ters

35,5

00

19%

3

4,18

0

18%

3

3,53

5

17%

3

2,61

7

17%

3

1,78

6

16%

-3

%

-10%

Doct

oral

3,23

8

2%

3,3

06

2%

3,5

66

2%

3,2

42

2%

3,0

57

2%

-6%

-6

%La

w

7,

425

4%

6

,776

4%

6

,116

3%

5

,720

3%

5

,282

3%

-8

%

-29%

Tota

l

189,

622

10

0%

192

,686

10

0%

198

,790

10

0%

187

,694

10

0%

194

,859

10

0%

4%

3%

Stu

dy

Ab

road

: Stu

dy A

broa

d (S

AB

) cou

rses

are

incl

uded

in th

e co

urse

leve

l of U

pper

rat

her

than

follo

win

g th

e st

anda

rd n

umer

ic v

alue

s as

soci

ated

with

the

cata

log

num

ber

of th

e co

urse

. N

ote

: The

low

er n

umbe

r of

uni

ts fo

r D

evel

opm

enta

l cou

rses

refle

cts

a re

cate

goriz

atio

n of

som

e E

nglis

h cl

asse

s fro

m D

evel

opm

enta

l to

Low

er.

Figu

re 2

.10a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

2.1

0b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t H

ours

by

Cou

rse

Leve

l


Sec

tio

n

2

Tabl

e 2.

11: T

otal

Fal

l 201

5 En

rollm

ent

by A

cade

mic

Lev

el: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Acad

emic

Lev

el

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1

year

5

year

Unde

rgra

duat

es

11,7

22

12,0

39

12,3

59

12,2

18

12,4

46

2%

6%M

aste

rs

4,67

6

4,50

1

4,39

3

4,20

4

3,94

7

-6%

-1

6%Do

ctor

al

486

48

4

509

48

1

448

-7

%

-8%

Law

56

3

501

46

9

442

42

8

-3%

-2

4%Un

iver

sity

Tot

al

17,4

47

17,5

25

17,7

30

17,3

45

17,2

69

0%

-1%


1 Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.Note: Some SCH gain in CLASS and Science is attributed to the redistribution of developmental English & Math courses to these units from Undergraduate Studies. This table uses units progress rather than units taken. Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to procedural changes.

Table 2.12: Fall Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Percent Change

College Enrollment % Enrollment % Enrollment % Enrollment % Enrollment % 1-Year 5-Year

Business 3,481 20% 3,369 19% 3,301 19% 3,448 20% 3,009 17% -13% -14%CLASS 3,736 21% 3,731 21% 3,691 21% 3,252 19% 2,979 17% -8% -20%Education 2,451 14% 2,266 13% 2,259 13% 2,052 12% 1,952 11% -5% -20%Nursing 559 3% 592 3% 628 4% 600 3% 589 3% -2% 5%Engineering 1,452 8% 1,569 9% 1,771 10% 1,948 11% 2,527 15% 30% 74%Science 3,368 19% 3,727 21% 3,841 22% 3,687 21% 3,689 21% 0% 10%Urban Affairs 689 4% 620 4% 576 3% 606 3% 653 4% 8% -5%Law 563 3% 501 3% 469 3% 442 3% 428 2% -3% -24%Undergraduate Studies 739 4% 780 4% 863 5% 965 6% 1,094 6% 13% 48%Undergraduate Non-Degree 274 2% 245 1% 220 1% 170 1% 209 1% 23% -24%Graduate Studies 23 0% 19 0% 28 0% 24 0% 23 0% -4% 0%Other1 112 1% 106 1% 83 0% 151 1% 117 1% -23% 4% Total Enrollment 17,447 100% 17,525 100% 17,730 100% 17,345 100% 17,269 100% 0% -1%

Table 2.13: Fall Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Percent Change

College SCH % SCH % SCH % SCH % SCH % 1-Year 5-Year

Business 27,156 14% 26,889 14% 27,276 14% 27,030 14% 25,519 13% -6% -6%CLASS 57,758 30% 58,808 31% 60,416 30% 55,231 29% 55,511 28% 1% -4%Education 16,542 9% 16,165 8% 16,224 8% 15,009 8% 15,116 8% 1% -9%Nursing 4,411 2% 4,564 2% 4,569 2% 4,364 2% 4,565 2% 5% 3%Engineering 10,290 5% 10,054 5% 11,572 6% 14,192 8% 19,414 10% 37% 89%Science 52,560 28% 56,361 29% 59,594 30% 54,556 29% 57,625 30% 6% 10%Urban Affairs 11,009 6% 10,245 5% 10,176 5% 8,870 5% 9,071 5% 2% -18%Law 7,425 4% 6,776 4% 6,116 3% 5,720 3% 5,282 3% -8% -29%Undergraduate Studies 1,190 1% 1,419 1% 1,596 1% 1,427 1% 1,499 1% 5% 26%Honors 141 0% 121 0% 120 0% 114 0% 132 0% 16% -6%Other1 1,140 1% 1,284 1% 1,131 1% 1,181 1% 1,125 1% -5% -1%Total SCH 189,622 100% 192,686 100% 198,790 100% 187,694 100% 194,859 100% 4% 3%

Figure 2.12 & 2.13: Fall Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15)

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

Enrollment FTE

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


Sec

tio

n

2

Figure 2.14: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level - Fall 2015

Table 2.14: Registered Student Credit Hours by Level - Fall 2015

Registered Credit

Undergraduate Graduate Law All

Hours Enrollment Cumulative % Enrollment Cumulative % Enrollment Cumulative % Enrollment Cumulative %

0 118 1% 0 0% 0 0% 118 1% 1 70 2% 164 4% 4 1% 238 2% 2 37 2% 46 5% 4 2% 87 3% 3 507 6% 435 15% 2 2% 944 8% 4 205 8% 291 21% 3 3% 499 11% 5 59 8% 36 22% 4 4% 99 11% 6 819 15% 848 41% 23 9% 1,690 21% 7 289 17% 234 47% 14 13% 537 24% 8 114 18% 319 54% 12 15% 445 27%GRAD FT 9 603 23% 858 74% 13 18% 1,474 36% 10 318 25% 209 78% 25 24% 552 39% 11 172 27% 128 81% 48 36% 348 41%UGRD FT 12 1,676 40% 342 89% 21 40% 2,039 53%LAW FT 13 1,373 51% 94 91% 19 45% 1,486 61% 14 984 59% 105 93% 24 50% 1,113 68% 15 2,133 76% 135 97% 127 80% 2,395 81% 16 1,619 89% 77 98% 48 91% 1,744 92% 17 671 95% 63 100% 24 97% 758 96% 18 505 99% 7 100% 13 100% 525 99% 19 129 100% 4 100% 0 100% 133 100% 20 24 100% 0 100% 0 100% 24 100% 21 14 100% 0 100% 0 100% 14 100% 22 5 100% 0 100% 0 100% 5 100% 23 2 100% 0 100% 0 100% 2 100%

TOTAL 12,446 4,395 428 17,269 Average 12.4 7.9 12.7 11.3

Note: For Graduate students, IPEDS definition of full-time status = 9 or more student credit hours is used here.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Undergraduate Graduate Law

0-3 4-7 8-11 12-15 16-19 20+


Table 2.15: Enrollment by Age Category - Fall 2015 65 and Average College Gender Under 18 18-19 20-21 22-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-49 50-64 Over Unknown Age

Business Female 7 168 212 258 277 126 59 99 36 2 - 26.9 Male 8 268 349 380 375 183 86 75 38 3 - 25.8 Total 15 436 561 638 652 309 145 174 74 5 - 26.3CLASS Female 15 338 409 358 252 120 79 140 110 7 - 27.0 Male 3 218 259 295 158 67 44 57 44 6 - 25.6 Total 18 556 668 653 410 187 123 197 154 13 - 26.5Education Female 3 92 145 301 343 171 105 174 104 4 - 30.4 Male 1 48 39 110 106 72 43 48 39 4 - 30.4 Total 4 140 184 411 449 243 148 222 143 8 - 30.4Nursing Female 9 186 107 59 56 32 23 26 16 - - 24.3 Male - 20 15 6 18 6 5 4 1 - - 25.1 Total 9 206 122 65 74 38 28 30 17 - - 24.4Engineering Female 2 88 71 124 60 23 7 12 5 - - 23.8 Male 13 385 387 675 406 145 52 52 19 1 - 24.0 Total 15 473 458 799 466 168 59 64 24 1 - 24.0Science Female 23 538 633 623 383 162 81 69 38 - - 23.9 Male 6 220 214 287 213 104 35 39 19 2 - 24.8 Total 29 758 847 910 596 266 116 108 57 2 - 24.2Urban Affairs Female - 17 47 52 78 47 40 64 51 1 - 33.3 Male - 13 27 66 47 33 20 31 18 1 - 30.6 Total - 30 74 118 125 80 60 95 69 2 - 32.3Law Female - - 4 86 70 18 16 11 12 3 - 29.2 Male - - 1 82 69 33 12 6 5 - - 27.9 Total - - 5 168 139 51 28 17 17 3 - 28.5Undergraduate Female 120 222 51 22 13 12 6 5 32 82 - 29.4Studies Male 109 189 47 38 11 5 4 7 37 82 - 30.5 Total 229 411 98 60 24 17 10 12 69 164 - 29.9Undergraduate Female - 9 12 39 12 8 8 8 10 1 - 29.4Non-Degree Male - 5 14 35 17 9 6 7 8 1 - 29.0 Total - 14 26 74 29 17 14 15 18 2 - 29.2Graduate Female - - - 1 4 - 2 - - 1 - 33.8Studies Male - - - 3 7 1 1 1 1 1 - 32.8 Total - - - 4 11 1 3 1 1 2 - 33.1Other1 Female 2 9 4 8 4 4 - - 1 - - 23.4 Male - 25 17 20 9 12 1 1 - - - 23.2 Total 2 34 21 28 13 16 1 1 1 - - 23.3University Female 181 1,667 1,695 1,931 1,552 723 426 608 415 101 - 26.9 Male 140 1,391 1,369 1,997 1,436 670 309 328 229 101 - 26.0 Total 321 3,058 3,064 3,928 2,988 1,393 735 936 644 202 - 26.51Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Programs and Study Abroad.Note: Age is unknown for one male student in Engineering.

Average Median

University: 26.5 23Undergraduate: 24.8 21Graduate: 30.1 28Law: 28.5 25

Figure 2.15: Enrollment by Age Category - Fall 2015


Sec

tio

n

2

Table 2.16: Enrollment by Level and Residency Status - Fall 2015

Resident Type Undergraduate Undergraduate in % Graduate Graduate in % Law Law in % Total

Ohio Resident 11,274 91 3393 77 414 97 15,081 Non-Ohio Resident 426 3 107 2 8 2 541 Non-Resident Alien 746 6 895 20 6 1 1,647 Total 12,446 100% 4,395 100% 428 100% 17,269

Note: Legal Studies (LGLS) who are associated with the College of Law, but working towards a graduate degree are shown in the Law column

Table 2.18: Enrollment by Ohio County Fall 2015

County Number of Students

Cuyahoga .......................................................................10,771Lake ..................................................................................1,274Lorain ...................................................................................940Medina .................................................................................486Summit ................................................................................402Geauga ................................................................................332Ashtabula ............................................................................147Trumbull ...............................................................................109Erie ......................................................................................104Portage ................................................................................103Stark ......................................................................................99Mahoning ...............................................................................61Franklin ..................................................................................48Wayne ....................................................................................39Huron .....................................................................................38Richland ................................................................................34Lucas .....................................................................................33Tuscarawas ............................................................................23Sandusky, Ottawa (21/county) ..............................................42Hamilton ................................................................................20Wood .....................................................................................19Montgomery ..........................................................................17Columbiana ...........................................................................14Fairfield ..................................................................................13Seneca ....................................................................................7Warren, Ashland (11/county) .................................................22Greene, Delaware (8/county) .................................................16Jefferson, Licking (6/county) .................................................12Crawford, Butler (5/county) ...................................................10Allen, Athens (4/county) ..........................................................8Union, Williams, Van Wert, Pickaway, Hancock (3/county) ...............................................................................15Knox, Putnam, Perry, Miami, Carroll, Belmont, Washington, Fulton, Holmes, Highland, Clermont, Defiance, Muskingum (2/county) ...........................................................26Hocking, Henry, Auglaize, Lawrence, Guernsey, Darke, Madison, Clark, Meigs, Ross, Clinton, Hardin, Harrison (1/county) ................................................................13Total ............................................................................................... 15,297* Excluding Non-Resident Aliens

Table 2.17: Enrollment by State Fall 2015

State Number of Students

Ohio .................................................................................... 15,297 Pennsylvania ............................................................................. 93 New York ................................................................................... 28 Michigan ................................................................................... 33 Illinois, California (15/state) ...................................................... 30 Indiana ...................................................................................... 17 Florida ...................................................................................... 13 New Jersey ............................................................................... 12 North Carolina ........................................................................... 11 Wisconsin ................................................................................. 10 Maryland ..................................................................................... 9 Virginia ......................................................................................... 8 Kentucky ..................................................................................... 7 Texas ........................................................................................... 6 West Virginia ............................................................................... 5 Washington, Connecticut, Georgia (4/state) ........................... 12 Vermont, Nebraska, Alabama, Idaho, Arizona, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Arkansas, New Hampshire, Colorado, Louisiana, Oregon (1/state) ...................................................... 12 Missouri, Iowa, Massachussetts (3/state) ................................. 9 Tennessee, Kansas, South Carolina, Minnesota (2/state) ........ 8 Unknown State ........................................................................... 2 Non-Resident Alien ............................................................. 1,647 Total States ..................................................................................17,269

Note: Table 2.16 is based on student’s residency for fee purposes, while Table 2.17 and 2.18 are based on student’s address.

Non-Resident Aliens are those with a citizenship status of Alien Temporary.

A resident of Ohio may have mail sent to an out of state address. As a result, Ohio resident totals may not match in the two tables.


Map of 2015 Fall Enrollment by Ohio County


Sec

tio

n

2

Country/Region Number of Students

India ...................................................................................................578

Saudi Arabia ......................................................................................574

China..................................................................................................108

Kuwait ..................................................................................................43

Nigeria .................................................................................................30

Iran (Islamic Republic Of) ....................................................................28

Korea, Republic of ...............................................................................19

Egypt ....................................................................................................15

Oman ...................................................................................................14

Taiwan, Province of China ....................................................................13

Brazil....................................................................................................11

Turkey ..................................................................................................10

Lebanon .................................................................................................9

Nepal, Russian Federation, Viet Nam, Canada (8/country) ..................32

Jordan, Pakistan, Venezuela (7/country) .............................................21

Table 2.19: Enrollment by Country or Regions, Fall 2015

France, Zambia, Australia, Germany (6/country) ..................................24

Bangladesh, Ghana, New Zealand, Mexico, Thailand (5/country) ........25

Syrian Arab Republic, Jamaica (4/country) ............................................8

Poland, Malaysia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Israel, Albania, Romania, United Kingdom, Peru (3/country) .......................................................24

Hong Kong, Philippines, Italy, Spain, Ecuador, Republic of Serbia, Japan, Sweden, United Arab Emirates, Colombia, Georgia (2/country) ...........22

Tunisia, Madagascar, Palestinian Territory, Occupied, Angola, Aruba, Burkina Faso, Austria, Sri Lanka, Bulgaria, Ethiopia, Gambia, Netherlands, Bolivia, Azerbaijan, Czech Republic, Guatemala, Ukraine, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Honduras, Nicaragua, Chile, Bahamas, Barbados, Botswana, Indonesia, Kenya, El Salvador, Greece, Morocco, Panama, Qatar, Senegal, South Africa, Iraq (1/country) ...........................................................................................37

Unknown ................................................................................................2

Total ................................................................................................1,647

Note: This list includes those students with Alien Temporary Status.

Source: Institutional Research

Country/Region Number of Students


Table 2.20: Spring Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Percent Change


Business 3,265 20% 3,201 19% 3,090 19% 3,290 20% 2,926 18% -11% -10%CLASS 3,499 21% 3,446 21% 3,389 20% 3,023 18% 2,879 18% -5% -18%Education 2,371 14% 2,285 14% 2,106 13% 1,894 12% 1,829 11% -3% -23%Nursing 588 4% 630 4% 641 4% 586 4% 639 4% 9% 9%Engineering 1,354 8% 1,534 9% 1,773 11% 1,931 12% 2,441 15% 26% 80%Science 3,185 19% 3,484 21% 3,605 22% 3,386 21% 3,455 21% 2% 8%Urban Affairs 641 4% 573 3% 562 3% 618 4% 617 4% 0% -4%Law 525 3% 474 3% 424 3% 417 3% 402 2% -4% -23%Undergraduate Studies 631 4% 763 5% 811 5% 867 5% 901 5% 4% 43%Undergraduate Non-Degree 284 2% 220 1% 192 1% 176 1% 184 1% 5% -35%Graduate Studies 46 0% 14 0% 27 0% 41 0% 23 0% -44% -50%Other1 88 1% 86 1% 75 0% 156 1% 105 1% -33% 19% Total Enrollment 16,477 100% 16,710 100% 16,695 100% 16,385 100% 16,401 100% 0% 0%

Table 2.21: Spring Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Percent Change


Business 25,618 15% 26,296 14% 26,563 14% 26,382 15% 25,431 14% -4% -1%CLASS 52,789 30% 55,955 31% 56,247 30% 49,903 28% 51,674 28% 4% -2%Education 16,980 10% 16,768 9% 16,065 9% 15,303 9% 15,317 8% 0% -10%Nursing 5,063 3% 5,481 3% 5,293 3% 5,123 3% 5,591 3% 9% 10%Engineering 10,024 6% 10,404 6% 12,606 7% 14,622 8% 18,991 10% 30% 89%Science 47,147 27% 50,493 28% 53,318 29% 49,300 28% 51,050 28% 4% 8%Urban Affairs 10,603 6% 9,993 5% 10,192 5% 9,028 5% 8,705 5% -4% -18%Law 6,844 4% 6,262 3% 5,498 3% 5,169 3% 4,930 3% -5% -28%Undergraduate Studies 186 0% 229 0% 215 0% 212 0% 258 0% 22% 39%Honors 101 0% 27 0% 57 0% 87 0% 74 0% -15% -27%Other1 1,019 1% 855 0% 935 1% 717 0% 887 0% 24% -13%Total SCH 176,374 100% 182,763 100% 186,989 100% 175,846 100% 182,908 100% 4% 4%

1 Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Program and Study Abroad.Note: Some SCH gain in CLASS and Science is attributed to the redistribution of developmental English & Math courses to these units from Undergraduate Studies. This table uses units progress rather than units taken. Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to procedural changes.

Figure 2.20 & 2.21: Spring Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15)

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

Enrollment FTE2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


Sec

tio

n

2

Table 2.22: Summer Enrollment by College: 5-Year Trend

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Percent Change


Business 1,783 24% 1,733 24% 1,607 23% 1,684 25% 1,590 24% -6% -11%CLASS 1,076 15% 1,066 15% 987 14% 875 13% 802 12% -8% -25%Education 1,420 19% 1,374 19% 1,248 18% 1,082 16% 1,010 15% -7% -29%Nursing 184 3% 172 2% 170 2% 156 2% 152 2% -3% -17%Engineering 366 5% 445 6% 486 7% 495 7% 631 9% 27% 72%Science 1,242 17% 1,337 18% 1,356 20% 1,304 20% 1,279 19% -2% 3%Urban Affairs 265 4% 218 3% 204 3% 206 3% 245 4% 19% -8%Law 207 3% 189 3% 142 2% 133 2% 136 2% 2% -34%Undergraduate Studies 133 2% 155 2% 165 2% 214 3% 239 4% 12% 80%Undergraduate Non-Degree 529 7% 493 7% 463 7% 378 6% 473 7% 25% -11%Graduate Studies 36 0% 19 0% 16 0% 23 0% 12 0% -48% -67%Other1 73 1% 94 1% 85 1% 99 1% 88 1% -11% 21% Total Enrollment 7,314 100% 7,295 100% 6,929 100% 6,649 100% 6,657 100% 0% -9%

Table 2.23: Summer Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Percent Change


Business 10,626 22% 10,594 22% 9,902 22% 10,349 24% 9,342 23% -10% -12%CLASS 10,821 22% 10,490 22% 9,572 21% 9,170 21% 7,257 18% -21% -33%Education 8,582 17% 8,132 17% 7,220 16% 6,486 15% 6,250 15% -4% -27%Nursing 1,436 3% 1,250 3% 1,396 3% 1,312 3% 1,438 4% 10% 0%Engineering 435 1% 938 2% 905 2% 942 2% 1,484 4% 58% 241%Science 12,236 25% 11,951 25% 12,462 27% 11,367 26% 11,403 28% 0% -7%Urban Affairs 3,774 8% 3,041 6% 2,950 6% 2,783 6% 2,289 6% -18% -39%Law 992 2% 922 2% 667 1% 737 2% 699 2% -5% -30%Undergraduate Studies - 0% - 0% - 0% 0 0% 0 0% - -Honors - 0% - 0% - 0% 0 0% 0 0% - -Other1 503 1% 540 1% 461 1% 439 1% 473 1% 8% -6%Total SCH 49,405 100% 47,858 100% 45,535 100% 43,585 100% 40,635 100% -7% -18%

1 Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Special Program and Study Abroad.Note: Some SCH gain in CLASS and Science is attributed to the redistribution of developmental English & Math courses to these units from Undergraduate Studies. This table uses units progress rather than units taken. Undergraduate Non-Degree and Graduate Studies fluctuations are due to procedural changes.

Figure 2.22 & 2.23: Summer Enrollment and FTE (SCH/15) Trend Summer 2011-2015


Table 2.24: Annualized Student Credit Hours (SCH) by College: 5-Year Trend

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Percent Change


Business 63,400 15% 63,779 15% 63,741 15% 63,761 16% 60,292 14% -5% -5%

CLASS 121,368 29% 125,253 29% 126,235 29% 114,304 28% 114,442 27% 0% -6%

Education 42,104 10% 41,065 10% 39,509 9% 36,798 9% 36,683 9% 0% -13%

Nursing 10,910 3% 11,295 3% 11,258 3% 10,799 3% 11,594 3% 7% 6%

Engineering 20,749 5% 21,396 5% 25,083 6% 29,756 7% 39,889 10% 34% 92%

Science 111,943 26% 118,805 28% 125,374 29% 115,223 28% 120,078 29% 4% 7%

Urban Affairs 25,386 6% 23,279 5% 23,318 5% 20,681 5% 20,065 5% -3% -21%

Law 15,261 4% 13,960 3% 12,281 3% 11,625 3% 10,910 3% -6% -29%

Undergraduate Studies 1,376 0% 1,648 0% 1,811 0% 1,639 0% 1,757 0% 7% 28%

Graduate Studies - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% - -

Honors 242 0% 148 0% 177 0% 201 0% 206 0% 2% -15%

Other1 2,662 1% 2,679 1% 2,527 1% 2,337 1% 2,485 1% 6% -7%

Total Annualized SCH 415,401 98% 423,307 98% 431,314 100% 407,124 100% 418,401 100% 3% 1%

Annualized FTE 13,847 14,110 14,377 13,571 13,947 3% 1%(Annualized SCH/30)

Unduplicated Enrollment 21,319 21,510 21,523 21,025 20,922 0% -2%

1Other includes students enrolled in Air Force, Career Services, English as a Second Language, Military Science, Physician Assistant, Special Programs and Study Abroad.

Figure 2.24: Annualized FTE (SCH/30) and Unduplicated Enrollment Trend


Sec

tio

n

2

Table 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions Fall 2011 – 2015

Percent Change

Campus Type 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-year 5-year

Community College 83,107 80,786 77,949 74,692 70,525 -5.6% -15.1%State Community College 80,459 74,669 72,805 68,994 68,262 -1.1% -15.2%Technical College 40,658 37,279 37,038 34,729 28,884 -16.8% -29.0%University Branch Campus 57,389 55,013 53,916 52,634 51,996 -1.2% -9.4%University Main Campus 289,882 287,306 288,452 267,923 289,099 7.9% -0.3%Note: (†) Medical University of Ohio was excluded because their data has not been finalized. Data for 2011 have now been finalized for Wright State University and Lorain County Community College, which has slightly increased some of the totals for 2011 that were reported in last year’s Book of Trends. Run Date: 10/6/2016.

Figure 2.25: Yearly Change in Enrollment by Campus Types for Ohio Institutions Fall 2011 – 2015

Table 2.26: Main Campus Enrollment for Select Ohio Four Year Institutions Fall 2011 – 2015

Percent Change

Institution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-year 5-year

University of Akron 27,998 26,930 25,573 24,563 23,505 -4.3% -16.0%Bowling Green State University 17,502 17,276 16,968 16,578 16,972 2.4% -3.0%University of Cincinnati 33,812 34,283 35,799† 36,976 37,102 0.3% 9.7%Cleveland State University 17,447 17,525 17,730 17,194 17,151 -0.3% -1.7%Central State University 2,476 2,125 2,051 1,718 1,717 -0.1% -30.7%Kent State University 28,064 28,827 29,172† 29,674 30,215 1.8% 7.7%Miami University 17,926 18,107 18,513 18,919 19,257 1.8% 7.4%Ohio State University 57,857† 57,516 58,398 59,099 59,422 0.5% 2.7%Ohio University 26,201 27,402 28,786 29,217 29,679 1.6% 13.3%Shawnee State University 4,684 4,620 4,320 4,230 3,898 -7.8% -16.8%University of Toledo 22,679 21,715 20,814 20,595 20,347 -1.2% -10.3%Wright State University 18,214† 16,665† 16,444† 16,528 16,745 1.3% -8.1%Youngstown State University 14,496 13,769 13,363 12,512 12,432 -0.6% -14.2%

Note: (†) Indicates institutions which had not finalized enrollment data by query date. Enrollment data excludes Study Abroad and Graduation Requirement course enrollments.Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Student Enrollment query. Run Date: October 6, 2016.

Enrollment Characteristicsof Students in CSU Colleges

3Book of Trends

Sec

tio

n

3


Tables 3.1 through 3.11a show the number of declared majors within a given department and school, not the number of students.

The rest of the tables in this chapter are at the school level and do follow the rubric of selecting students based on their primary major, as determined by state reporting rules. As such, these tables do represent headcounts.

29Section 3 - Enrollment Characteristics of Students in CSU Colleges

Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

1: C

olle

ge o

f Bus

ines

s: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Leve

l and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fall

Term

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Acco

untin

g Ac

coun

ting

366

3

72

393

4

26

413

-3

%

13%

Busi

ness

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Busi

ness

Eco

nom

ics

56

5

2

42

4

4

67

52

%

20%

Ge

nera

l Bus

ines

s 5

36

546

5

44

523

5

04

-4%

-6

%

Gene

ral B

usin

ess

- Acc

eler

ated

2

-

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Ge

nera

l Bus

ines

s -

Mob

ile

-

-

7

32

2

7

-16%

--

In

tern

atio

nal B

usin

ess

120

1

00

75

8

8

109

24

%

-9%

Pr

e-Ge

nera

l Bus

ines

s 6

2

1

3

1

-6

7%

-83%

Bu

sine

ss B

iote

chno

logy

(Cer

tifica

te)

-

1

1

-

-

--

--Co

mpu

ter &

Info

rmat

ion

Scie

nce

Com

pute

r and

Info

rmat

ion

Scie

nce

183

2

13

206

2

50

-

-100

%

-100

%

Com

pute

r Sci

ence

2

3

26

2

8

12

-

-1

00%

-1

00%

Fina

nce

Fina

nce

158

1

31

142

2

35

272

16

%

72%

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

117

1

09

108

1

31

156

19

%

33%

Man

agem

ent a

nd L

abor

Rel

atio

ns

Man

agem

ent &

Lab

or R

elat

ions

1

19

95

8

4

110

1

57

43%

32

%M

arke

ting

Inte

rnat

iona

l Bus

ines

s 2

2

1

-

-

--

-1

00%

M

arke

ting

221

2

14

206

2

58

271

5%

23

%Op

erat

ions

and

Sup

ply

Chai

n M

anag

emen

t Op

erat

ions

& S

uppl

y Ch

ain

Mgm

t 5

9

65

9

3

133

1

45

9%

146%

M

anuf

actu

ring

Man

agem

ent (

Cert

ifica

te)

-

-

-

-

7

--

--Ot

her B

usin

ess

Busi

ness

Und

ecid

ed

140

8

3

38

2

7

4

-85%

-9

7%To

tal

2

,108

2

,011

1

,969

2

,272

2

,133

-6

%

1%Gr

adua

te (e

xclu

ding

Doc

tora

l)

Acco

untin

g Fi

nanc

ial A

ccou

ntin

g &

Audi

t 2

24

243

2

43

198

1

41

-29%

-3

7%

Tax

Prog

ram

4

3

44

4

2

41

3

3

-20%

-2

3%Bu

sine

ss A

dmin

istr

atio

n Ac

cele

rate

d Bu

sine

ss A

dmin

istr

atio

n 4

6

44

3

3

33

1

6

-52%

-6

5%

Acce

lera

ted

Mob

ile M

BA

-

-

26

3

4

22

-3

5%

--

Busi

ness

Adm

inis

trat

ion

664

6

17

573

5

41

497

-8

%

-25%

Ex

ecut

ive

Busi

ness

Adm

inis

trat

ion

28

3

1

41

4

3

27

-3

7%

-4%

M

aste

r of B

usin

ess

Adm

inis

trat

ion

2

3

5

5

4

-20%

10

0%

MBA

-Hea

lth C

are

44

4

9

52

3

5

32

-9

%

-27%

Gl

obal

Bus

ines

s (C

ertifi

cate

) 1

-

-

-

1

--

0%

He

alth

Car

e In

form

atic

s Ce

rt (C

ertifi

cate

) 1

2

2

-

1

--

0%

Or

gani

zatio

nal C

hang

e (C

ertifi

cate

) -

-

-

-

1

--

--

St

rate

gic

Busi

ness

Ana

lytic

s (C

ertifi

cate

) -

-

-

-

1

1

--

--

Grad

uate

Bus

ines

s (N

on-D

egre

e)

198

1

84

147

9

4

79

-1

6%

-60%

Com

pute

r & In

form

atio

n Sc

ienc

e Co

mpu

ter a

nd In

form

atio

n Sc

ienc

e 8

8

91

1

02

111

-

-1

00%

-1

00%

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

-

-

-

-

20

--

--

Man

agem

ent a

nd L

abor

Rel

atio

ns

Labo

r Rel

atio

ns a

nd H

R 7

0

73

7

3

44

2

7

-39%

-6

1%M

arke

ting

Mar

ketin

g An

alyt

ics

(Cer

tifica

te)

2

2

2

1

-

-100

%

-100

%To

tal

1

,411

1

,383

1

,341

1

,180

9

12

-23%

-3

5%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Tabl

e 3.

1: C

olle

ge o

f Bus

ines

s: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Leve

l and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fa

ll Te

rm

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Doct

oral

Busi

ness

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Fina

nce

8

7

5

5

2

-60%

-7

5%

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

10

8

1

2

10

1

1

10%

10

%

Mar

ketin

g 1

1

9

5

4

3

-25%

-7

3%

Mar

ketin

g-Gl

obal

Bus

ines

s Sp

ecia

lizat

ion

2

1

12

1

0

7

-30%

25

0%La

bor R

elat

ions

and

Hum

an R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

t and

Lab

or R

elat

ions

2

-

6

3

2

-3

3%

0%Op

erat

ion

Man

agem

ent a

nd B

usin

ess

Oper

Mgm

t and

Bus

Sta

t 5

5

1

3

10

5

-5

0%

0%St

atis

tics

Tota

l

38

30

5

3

42

3

0

-29%

-2

1%

Bu

sine

ss T

otal

3,5

57

3,4

24

3,3

63

3,4

94

3,0

75

-12%

-1

4%

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

2 :

Col

lege

of L

iber

al A

rts

and

Soci

al S

cien

ces:

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by L

evel

and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fa

ll Te

rm

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Art

Art E

duca

tion

-

20

1

8

14

8

-4

3%

--

Art H

isto

ry

238

7

7

78

2

2

19

-1

4%

-92%

Ar

ts M

anag

emen

t & C

omm

unity

De

(Cer

tifica

te)

1

1

1

1

3

200%

20

0%

Grap

hic

Desi

gn (C

ertifi

cate

) 7

5

6

2

4

10

0%

-43%

St

udio

Art

-

-

-

3

6

59

64

%

--

Stud

io A

rt: D

raw

ing

-

15

1

5

9

9

0%

--

Stud

io A

rt: G

raph

ic D

esig

n -

7

0

74

8

2

84

2%

--

St

udio

Art

: Pai

ntin

g -

1

0

8

-

2

--

--

Stud

io A

rt: P

hoto

grap

hy

-

17

2

5

16

7

-5

6%

--

Stud

io A

rt: P

rint M

akin

g -

2

1

1

-

-1

00%

--

St

udio

Art

: Scu

lptu

re

-

4

6

2

1

-50%

--

Blac

k St

udie

s Bl

ack

Stud

ies

4

10

7

8

1

1

38%

17

5%Co

mm

unic

atio

n Co

mm

unic

atio

n 2

03

192

2

00

191

1

84

-4%

-9

%

Com

mun

icat

ion

Man

agem

ent

39

3

7

53

5

2

50

-4

%

28%

Fi

lm, T

V an

d In

tera

ctiv

e M

edia

1

74

168

1

80

195

2

05

5%

18%

Jo

urna

lism

& P

rom

otio

nal C

omm

1

85

201

1

88

176

1

83

4%

-1%

M

ultim

edia

Adv

ertis

ing

(Cer

tifica

te)

-

-

1

1

-

-100

%

--Cr

imin

olog

y, An

thro

polo

gy, a

nd S

ocio

logy

An

thro

polo

gy

89

7

6

88

8

1

69

-1

5%

-22%

Cr

imin

al J

ustic

e (C

ertifi

cate

) 1

1

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Cr

imin

olog

y 3

53

351

3

41

324

3

16

-2%

-1

0%

Ling

uist

ics

28

3

0

19

2

3

32

39

%

14%

So

ciol

ogy

178

1

66

161

1

46

134

-8

%

-25%

Econ

omic

s Ec

onom

ics

38

4

6

46

3

9

46

18

%

21%

Engl

ish

Engl

ish

244

2

06

209

1

06

100

-6

%

-59%

En

glis

h-Cr

eativ

e W

ritin

g Tr

ack

-

-

-

51

3

9

-24%

--

En

glis

h-In

tgrt

ed L

angu

age

Arts

-

-

-

3

0

30

0%

--

Pr

of. W

ritin

g Ce

rtifi

cate

(Cer

tifica

te)

-

1

-

1

-

-100

%

--Hi

stor

y Hi

stor

y 1

22

104

9

0

96

1

00

4%

-18%

So

cial

Stu

dies

4

3

39

3

3

35

4

4

26%

2%

So

cial

Stu

dies

- In

tegr

ated

SS

-

-

-

-

3

--

--In

terd

isci

plin

ary

Stud

ies

Clas

sica

l and

Med

ieva

l Stu

dies

9

9

1

2

9

6

-33%

-3

3%

Libe

ral S

tudi

es

46

3

6

48

3

0

33

10

%

-28%

Mus

ic

Mus

ic

82

2

0

17

2

7

26

-4

%

-68%

M

usic

Com

posi

tion

-

8

7

9

15

67

%

--

Mus

ic E

duca

tion

3

35

2

9

47

4

2

-11%

13

00%

M

usic

Per

form

ance

6

2

9

19

2

6

30

15

%

400%

M

usic

The

rapy

4

3

8

31

6

5

63

-3

%

1475

%

Pre-

Mus

ic

62

3

2

68

1

6

18

13

%

-71%

Othe

r CLA

SS

Lib

Arts

& S

oc S

ci U

ndec

ided

2

19

347

3

98

238

6

1

-74%

-7

2%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

N

ote:

Oth

er C

LAS

S (F

C) r

epre

sent

s fo

rmer

Firs

t Col

lege

stu

dent

s w

ith n

on-s

peci

fic m

ajor

s, s

uch

as

Per

sona

lly D

esig

ned

Maj

or, w

ho h

ave

not d

ecla

red

a ne

w m

ajor

.


Tabl

e 3.

2 :

Col

lege

of L

iber

al A

rts

and

Soci

al S

cien

ces:

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by L

evel

and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Ex

plor

ator

y Ad

visi

ng

253

1

91

120

1

5

5

-67%

-9

8%Ph

iloso

phy

Bioe

thic

s Ce

rtifi

cate

(Cer

tifica

te)

3

1

1

-

1

--

-67%

Ph

iloso

phy

25

2

6

27

1

9

16

-1

6%

-36%

Ph

iloso

phy

- Et

hics

Tra

ck

1

2

2

4

5

25%

40

0%Po

litic

al S

cien

ce

Inte

rnat

iona

l Rel

atio

ns

92

9

6

94

7

1

54

-2

4%

-41%

Po

litic

al S

cien

ce

143

1

48

126

1

35

124

-8

%

-13%

Relig

ious

Stu

dies

Co

mpa

rativ

e Re

ligio

n 2

5

21

2

3

16

1

5

-6%

-4

0%So

cial

Wor

k Pr

e-So

cial

Wor

k 1

07

143

1

67

133

1

44

8%

35%

So

cial

Wor

k 2

42

219

1

92

205

1

92

-6%

-2

1%So

ciol

ogy

and

Crim

inol

ogy

Soci

al S

cien

ce

13

8

1

1

6

6

0%

-54%

Thea

tre

and

Danc

e Th

eatr

e Ar

ts

54

6

3

81

8

6

85

-1

%

57%

Wom

en’s

Stu

dies

W

omen

’s S

tudi

es

8

7

10

4

7

75

%

-13%

Wor

ld L

angu

ages

, Lite

ratu

re a

nd C

ultu

re

Fren

ch

12

1

3

14

1

7

15

-1

2%

25%

Sp

anis

h 5

5

52

5

6

50

5

0

0%

-9%

Tota

l

3,4

11

3,3

93

3,4

01

2,9

68

2,7

55

-7%

-1

9%

Fa

ll Te

rm

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Grad

uate

(exc

ludi

ng D

octo

ral)

Ar

t Ar

t 1

-

2

5

3

-4

0%

200%

Com

mun

icat

ion

Com

mun

icat

ion

Thry

and

Met

hdy

30

2

2

19

2

0

16

-2

0%

-47%

Co

mm

unic

atio

n Th

ry a

nd M

ethd

y 4+

1 -

1

1

-

-

--

--

Econ

omic

s Ec

onom

ics

31

2

9

27

2

2

16

-2

7%

-48%

Engl

ish

Engl

ish

74

7

7

70

5

2

44

-1

5%

-41%

M

str o

f Fin

e Ar

ts-C

reat

ive

Wri

24

2

0

20

1

9

24

26

%

0%Gr

adua

te S

tudi

es

Grad

Lib

Arts

&Soc

Sci N

on-d

egre

e (N

on-D

egre

e)

73

6

1

73

5

6

38

-3

2%

-48%

Hist

ory

Hist

ory

38

3

4

30

2

7

25

-7

%

-34%

Mus

ic

Mus

ic

28

3

2

25

2

4

20

-1

7%

-29%

M

usic

Per

form

ance

(Cer

tifica

te)

-

-

-

5

3

-40%

--

Philo

soph

y Ad

vanc

ed S

tudy

in B

ioet

hics

(Cer

tifica

te)

3

1

4

1

1

0%

-67%

Ph

iloso

phy

13

1

4

8

7

8

14%

-3

8%Po

litic

al S

cien

ce

Glob

al In

tera

ctio

n 4

6

33

3

0

27

1

9

-30%

-5

9%

Glob

al In

tera

ctio

n 4+

1 -

-

-

-

1

--

--

Soci

al W

ork

Soci

al W

ork

206

2

46

220

2

53

246

-3

%

19%

Soci

olog

y So

ciol

ogy

32

2

6

25

1

5

8

-47%

-7

5%W

orld

Lan

guag

es, L

itera

ture

and

Cul

ture

Sp

anis

h 1

1

7

11

1

6

10

-3

8%

-9%

Tota

l

610

6

03

565

5

49

482

-1

2%

-21%

CLAS

S To

tal

4

,021

3

,996

3

,966

3

,517

3

,237

-8

%

-19%

Fa

ll Te

rm

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age


SEC

TIO

N

3

Tabl

e 3.

3: C

olle

ge o

f Edu

cati

on a

nd H

uman

Ser

vice

s: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Fa

ll T

erm

P

erc

en

t C

han

ge

Dep

art

men

t/P

rog

ram

D

esc

rip

tion

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

1 y

ear

5 y

ear

Un

derg

rad

ua

te

Heal

th a

nd H

uman

Per

form

ance

Ex

erci

se/F

itnes

s Sp

ecia

list

18

25

31

30

34

13%

89

%

Phys

ical

Edu

catio

n 19

24

26

22

24

9%

26

%

Spor

ts M

anag

emen

t 10

19

20

24

36

50

%

260%

Ph

ysic

al E

duca

tion

PK-1

2 (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 3

--

--Te

ache

r Edu

catio

n Ea

rly C

hild

hood

Edu

catio

n 19

8 19

4 21

8 22

4 21

5 -4

%

9%

Mid

Chi

ldho

od L

ang

Arts

& M

ath

- 18

16

16

17

6%

--

M

id C

hild

hood

Lan

g Ar

ts &

Sci

-

6 6

5 7

40%

--

M

id C

hild

hood

Lan

g Ar

ts &

SSt

-

18

22

23

24

4%

--

Mid

Chi

ldho

od M

ath

& Sc

ienc

e -

30

28

26

26

0%

--

Mid

Chi

ldho

od M

ath

& So

c St

-

19

17

14

13

-7%

--

M

id C

hild

hood

Sci

ence

& S

St

- 7

12

6 9

50%

--

M

iddl

e Ch

ildho

od E

duca

tion

116

2 3

- -

--

-100

%

Mild

/Mod

erat

e Ed

ucat

iona

l Nee

d 79

85

97

85

86

1%

9%

M

oder

ate/

Inte

nsiv

e Ed

uc’lN

eeds

39

38

32

36

30

-1

7%

-23%

Sp

ecia

l Edu

catio

n 2

2 -

- -

--

-100

%

TESO

L Ce

rtifi

cate

Und

ergr

ad (C

ertifi

cat

e)

2 3

2

1 --

-5

0%

Bilin

gual

End

orse

men

t (Li

cens

ure)

-

- -

- 1

--

--

Early

Chi

ldho

od E

duca

tion

PK-3

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

5 --

--

Ed

ucat

ion

- Vis

ual A

rt P

K-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

2 --

--

Ed

ucat

ion

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

65

--

--

Educ

atio

n (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 53

--

--

Fo

reig

n La

ngua

ge-F

renc

h PK

-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

3 --

--

Fo

reig

n La

ngua

ge-S

pani

sh P

K12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

2 --

--

In

tegr

ated

Lan

guag

e Ar

ts 7

-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

6 --

--

In

tegr

ated

Mat

h &

Phys

ics

7-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

1 --

--

In

tegr

ated

Mat

h 7-

12 (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 3

--

--

Inte

grat

ed S

cien

ce (B

IO) 7

-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

13

--

--

Inte

grat

ed S

cien

ce (C

HM) 7

-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

1 --

--

In

tegr

ated

Sci

ence

(PHY

) 7-1

2 (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 1

--

--

Inte

grat

ed S

cien

ce, E

arth

7-1

2 (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 1

--

--

Inte

grat

ed S

ocia

l Stu

dies

7-1

2 (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 4

--

--

Mid

Chi

ldho

od L

ang

Arts

& M

ath

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

3 --

--

M

id C

hild

hood

Lan

g Ar

ts &

Sci

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

1 --

--

M

id C

hild

hood

Lan

g Ar

ts &

SSt

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

3 --

--

M

id C

hild

hood

Mat

h &

Scie

nce

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

4 --

--

M

id C

hild

hood

Sci

ence

& S

St (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 5

--

--

MId

Chi

ldho

od S

ocia

l Stu

dies

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

1 --

--

M

usic

Edu

catio

n PK

-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

3 --

--

TE

SOL

Endo

rsem

ent K

-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

2 --

--

Othe

r Edu

catio

n Ed

uc &

Hum

an S

erv

Unde

cide

d 20

12

12

7

2 -7

1%

-89%

Pr

e-Ed

- Ea

rly C

hild

hood

Ed

6 4

2 -

- --

-1

00%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Tabl

e 3.

3: C

olle

ge o

f Edu

cati

on a

nd H

uman

Ser

vice

s: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Fa

ll T

erm

P

erc

en

t C

han

ge

Dep

art

men

t/P

rog

ram

D

esc

rip

tion

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

1 y

ear

5 y

ear

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Pr

e-Ed

uc &

Hum

an S

erv

(Edu

c)

159

118

120

87

81

-7%

-4

9%

Pre-

Educ

atio

n 22

0 21

1 18

6 13

8 15

0 9%

-3

2%

Pre-

Educ

atio

n - S

peci

al E

d 1

1 1

1 1

0%

0%

Educ

atio

n (C

ertifi

cat

e)

2 2

1 2

- -1

00%

-1

00%

Te

ache

r Cer

tifi c

atio

n (C

ertifi

cat

e)

86

67

57

66

1 -9

8%

-99%

Tota

l

97

7

90

5

90

9

81

2

94

3

16

%

-3%

Gra

du

ate

(excl

ud

ing

Do

cto

ral)

Coun

selin

g, A

dmin

istr

atio

n, S

uper

visi

on

Adul

t Lea

rnin

g an

d De

velo

pmen

t 10

5 99

90

78

92

18

%

-12%

and

Adul

t Lea

rnin

g Cl

inic

al M

enta

l Hea

lth C

nslin

g 63

91

10

9 11

5 11

5 0%

83

%

Coun

selin

g an

d Pu

pil P

er

1 2

3 1

1 0%

0%

Co

unse

lor E

duca

tion

68

46

55

55

55

0%

-19%

Ed

Sp

in A

d -

Pupi

l Svc

s Ad

min

-

- -

1 -

-100

%

--

Ed S

p in

Adm

in-C

,I &

Prof

Dev

-

- -

1 -

-100

%

--

Educ

Spe

c in

Adm

in -

Prin

cipa

l -

- -

4 -

-100

%

--

Educ

atio

n Ad

min

Spe

cial

ist

25

24

14

- -

--

-100

%

Educ

atio

nal A

dmin

istr

atio

n 50

46

44

38

39

3%

-2

2%

Heal

th P

rofe

ssio

ns E

duca

tion

- -

- -

7 --

--

Su

perv

isio

n 2

4 3

1 -

-100

%

-100

%

Adul

t Lea

rnin

g an

d De

velo

pmen

t (Ce

rtifi

cate

) 5

6 3

2 -

-100

%

-100

%

Chem

ical

Dep

ende

ncy

Coun

c (C

ertifi

cat

e)

3 3

1 1

2 10

0%

-33%

Ea

rly C

hild

hood

Men

tal H

ealth

(Cer

tifi c

ate)

2

- 3

2 1

-50%

-5

0%

Clin

ical

Men

tal H

lth C

ouns

el (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 1

--

--

Insp

ired

Lead

ers

Prin

cipa

l (Li

cens

ure)

-

- -

- 5

--

--

Prin

cipa

l Lic

ensu

re (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 2

--

--

Scho

ol C

ouns

elin

g (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 5

--

--

Supe

rinte

nden

t (Li

cens

ure)

-

- -

9 13

44

%

--

Teac

her L

eade

r End

orse

men

t (Li

cens

ure)

1 3

- -

--

--

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip

(Spe

cial

ist)

16

10

3 -

- --

-1

00%

Curr

icul

um a

nd F

ound

atio

ns

C&I-A

dvan

ced/

Appl

ied

Teac

hing

-

- -

2 2

0%

--

C&I-C

hine

se L

angu

age

- -

8 13

22

69

%

--

C&I-E

duca

tion

Rese

arch

-

- 10

7

6 -1

4%

--

C&I-E

duca

tiona

l Tec

hnol

ogy

- -

38

39

32

-18%

--

C&

I-Gift

ed&T

alen

tedL

earn

ers

- -

13

14

17

21%

--

C&

I-Sec

onda

ry-M

UST-

Engl

ish

- -

4 4

5 25

%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-MUS

T-M

ath

- -

- 1

2 10

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-MUS

T-M

oder

n La

ng

- -

1 1

3 20

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-MUS

T-Sc

ienc

e -

- 2

4 5

25%

--

C&

I-Sec

onda

ry-M

UST-

Soci

al S

tud

- -

2 2

9 35

0%

--

Curr

icul

um a

nd In

stru

ctio

n 49

7 44

5 50

9

6 -3

3%

-99%

Gi

fted

Endo

rsem

ent (

Lice

nsur

e)

- -

- -

7 --

--

Heal

th a

nd H

uman

Per

form

ance

Co

mm

unity

Hea

lth P

rom

otio

n 18

20

27

26

25

-4

%

39%

Ex

erci

se S

cien

ce

43

42

59

61

57

-7%

33

%


SEC

TIO

N

3

Tabl

e 3.

3: C

olle

ge o

f Edu

cati

on a

nd H

uman

Ser

vice

s: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Fa

ll T

erm

P

erc

en

t C

han

ge

Dep

art

men

t/P

rog

ram

D

esc

rip

tion

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

1 y

ear

5 y

ear

M

aste

r of P

ublic

Hea

lth

28

25

- -

- --

-1

00%

Sp

ort M

anag

emen

t 37

29

27

24

29

21

%

-22%

Sp

orts

Man

agem

ent,

Exer

c 6

8 1

- 1

--

-83%

Teac

her E

duca

tion

C&I-E

arly

Chi

ld In

terv

Spe

c -

- 19

27

25

-7

%

--

C&I-E

arly

Chi

ldho

od E

duc

- -

42

58

56

-3%

--

C&

I-Ele

men

tary

-

- 4

4 3

-25%

--

C&

I-Lite

racy

Dev

-Adu

lt Li

t -

- 2

1 -

-100

%

--

C&I-L

itera

cy D

ev-B

iling

ual

- -

- -

1 --

--

C&

I-Lite

racy

Dev

elop

men

t-TE

SOL

- -

20

27

24

-11%

--

C&

I-Lite

racy

Dev

-Rea

ding

-

- 40

47

46

-2

%

--

C&I-M

ild /

Mod

erat

e -

- 11

0 10

7 75

-3

0%

--

C&I-M

oder

ate

/ Int

ensi

ve

- -

41

28

25

-11%

--

C&

I-Sch

ool H

ealth

-

- 2

1 1

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-Art

-

- 3

1 -

-100

%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-Eng

lish

- -

2 2

2 0%

--

C&

I-Sec

onda

ry-M

ath

- -

2 3

1 -6

7%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-Mod

ern

Lang

uage

-

- 1

- -

--

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-Sci

ence

-

- 2

4 -

-100

%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-Soc

ial S

tudi

es

- -

3 6

4 -3

3%

--

Autis

m S

pect

rum

Dis

orde

r/Fd

tn (C

ertifi

cat

e)

- 1

- -

- --

--

Ce

rtifi

cate

Pro

gram

in T

ESOL

(Cer

tifi c

ate)

1

3 4

4 3

-25%

20

0%

Early

Chi

ld In

ter S

pec

PreK

-3 (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

1 5

400%

--

Ea

rly C

hild

hood

Pre

K-3

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

2 --

--

M

ild/M

od In

terv

entio

n Sp

c K-

12 (L

icen

sure

) -

- -

- 3

--

--

Mod

/Inte

nsiv

e Sp

ec K

-12

(Lic

ensu

re)

- -

- -

4 --

--

Re

adin

g En

dors

emen

t (Li

cens

ure)

-

- -

- 7

--

--Ot

her E

duca

tion

Grad

uate

Edu

catio

n -

- -

- 1

--

--

Grad

uate

Edu

catio

n (L

icen

sure

) 24

4 24

5 25

4 19

7 11

6 -4

1%

-52%

Gr

adua

te E

duca

tion

(Non

-Deg

ree)

16

5 12

5 14

1 13

5 95

-3

0%

-42%

Tota

l

1,3

79

1

,27

5

1,2

65

1

,16

8

1,0

65

-9

%

-23

%

Docto

ral

Doct

oral

Ur

ban

Ed: A

dmin

istr

atio

n 1

6

13

9

8

1

1

38%

-3

1%

Urba

n Ed

: Adu

lt Co

ntin

uing

& H

ighe

r Ed

-

-

-

6

9

50%

--

Ur

ban

Ed: C

ouns

elin

g 1

7

16

2

1

11

6

-4

5%

-65%

Ur

ban

Ed: C

ouns

elin

g Ps

ycho

logy

2

2

16

1

3

19

2

0

5%

-9%

Ur

ban

Ed: L

eade

rshi

p an

d Li

felo

ng L

earn

ing

23

1

5

12

9

5

-4

4%

-78%

Ur

ban

Ed: L

earn

ing

and

Deve

lopm

ent

26

3

1

26

2

3

19

-1

7%

-27%

Ur

ban

Ed: N

ursi

ng E

duca

tion

1

2

2

2

3

50%

20

0%

Urba

n Ed

: Pol

icy

Stud

ies

16

1

9

19

1

9

21

11

%

31%

Tota

l

12

1

11

2

10

2

97

9

4

-3%

-2

2%

Ed

uca

tion

Tota

l

2,4

77

2

,29

2

2,2

76

2,0

77

2

,10

2

1%

-1

5%


Tabl

e 3.

4: S

choo

l of N

ursi

ng: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Fall

Term

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

eNu

rsin

g Nu

rsin

g, A

ccel

erat

ed

-

65

7

0

66

7

0

6%

--

Nurs

ing,

Bas

ic

212

2

37

239

2

25

219

-3

%

3%

Prep

arat

ory/

Pre-

Nurs

ing

200

2

18

249

2

38

221

-7

%

11%

RN

to B

SN

90

1

9

14

2

2

31

41

%

-66%

Tota

l

502

539

572

551

541

-2%

8%

Grad

uate

(exc

ludi

ng D

octo

ral)

Nu

rsin

g M

S Nu

rsin

g &

MBA

Joi

nt D

egre

e 2

2

3

5

5

0%

15

0%

Nurs

ing

53

5

0

45

4

3

41

-5

%

-23%

Sc

hool

Nur

se L

icen

c Pr

ep

-

2

2

-

-

--

--

Scho

ol N

urse

Lic

enc

Prep

(Cer

tifica

te)

1

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Nurs

ing

Educ

atio

n Ce

rt (C

ertifi

cate

) 1

-

1

-

-

--

-1

00%

Gr

adua

te N

ursi

ng N

onde

gree

(Non

-Deg

ree)

2

4

4

3

4

33

%

100%

Tota

l

59

58

55

51

50

-2%

-1

5%

Nu

rsin

g To

tal

56

1 59

7 62

7 60

2 59

1 -2

%

5%


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

5: C

olle

ge o

f Eng

inee

ring

: Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by L

evel

and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fall

Term

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Chem

ical

and

Bio

med

ical

Eng

inee

ring

Chem

ical

Eng

inee

ring

101

1

12

148

2

03

216

6%

11

4%Ci

vil a

nd E

nviro

nmen

tal E

ngin

eerin

g Ci

vil E

ngin

eerin

g 1

08

109

1

10

129

1

48

15%

37

%El

ectr

ical

Eng

inee

ring

and

Com

pute

r Sci

ence

Co

mpu

ter E

ngin

eerin

g 7

1

89

1

08

111

1

15

4%

62%

Co

mpu

ter S

cien

ce

-

-

-

-

277

--

--

El

ectr

ical

Eng

inee

ring

157

1

62

158

1

66

166

0%

6%

Engi

neer

ing

Tech

nolo

gy

Elec

tron

ic E

gr T

echn

olog

y 5

1

37

4

2

52

6

8

31%

33

%

Mec

hani

cal E

gr T

echn

olog

y 3

8

35

5

1

94

9

9

5%

161%

Mec

hani

cal E

ngin

eerin

g M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

215

2

43

300

3

55

425

20

%

98%

Othe

r Eng

inee

ring

Engi

neer

ing

Unde

cide

d 3

9

38

4

0

20

1

1

-45%

-7

2%

Pre-

Engi

neer

ing

226

3

44

362

2

64

295

12

%

31%

Tota

l

1,00

6 1,

169

1,31

9 1,

394

1,82

0 31

%

81%

Grad

uate

(exc

ludi

ng D

octo

ral)

Chem

ical

and

Bio

med

ical

Eng

inee

ring

Biom

edic

al E

ngin

eerin

g 3

3

40

3

5

34

3

0

-12%

-9

%

Chem

ical

Eng

inee

ring

36

2

7

30

3

1

32

3%

-1

1%Ci

vil a

nd E

nviro

nmen

tal E

ngin

eerin

g Ci

vil E

ngin

eerin

g 3

1

28

4

1

55

6

0

9%

94%

En

gine

erin

g M

echa

nics

3

2

3

3

4

33

%

33%

En

viro

nmen

tal E

ngin

eerin

g 5

7

6

3

6

10

0%

20%

Elec

tric

al E

ngin

eerin

g an

d Co

mpu

ter S

cien

ce

Com

pute

r Sci

ence

-

-

-

-

8

0

--

--

Elec

tric

al E

ngin

eerin

g 1

45

123

1

60

227

2

91

28%

10

1%

Softw

are

Engi

neer

ing

33

3

5

35

2

8

36

29

%

9%M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

Mec

hani

cal E

ngin

eerin

g 8

2

58

7

5

96

1

00

4%

22%

Othe

r Eng

inee

ring

Grad

uate

Eng

inee

ring

(Non

-Deg

ree)

2

6

18

1

1

16

1

0

-38%

-6

2%To

tal

39

4 33

8 39

6 49

3 64

9 32

%

65%

Doct

oral

Do

ctor

of E

ngin

eerin

g Ap

plie

d Bi

omed

ical

Eng

inee

ring

22

2

4

26

2

9

20

-3

1%

-9%

Ch

emic

al E

ngin

eerin

g 3

1

3

5

7

40

%

133%

Ci

vil E

ngin

eerin

g 9

9

5

6

6

0%

-3

3%

Elec

tric

al E

ngin

eerin

g 2

5

23

2

2

22

2

4

9%

-4%

M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

10

1

1

13

1

2

16

33

%

60%

Tota

l

69

68

69

74

73

-1%

6%

Engi

neer

ing

Tota

l

1,46

9 1,

575

1,78

4 1,

961

2,54

2 30

%

73%


cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Tabl

e 3.

6: C

olle

ge o

f Sci

ence

s an

d H

ealt

h Pr

ofes

sion

s: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Fall

Term

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Biol

ogy,

Geol

ogy

and

Envi

ronm

enta

l Sci

ence

Bi

olog

y 4

46

475

5

33

541

5

35

-1%

20

%

Biol

ogy

- In

tegr

ated

Sci

ence

-

-

-

-

9

--

--

Bi

olog

y Pr

e-Po

diat

ry

-

1

1

-

-

--

--

Biol

ogy-

Med

ical

Tec

hnol

ogy

61

6

8

87

7

7

69

-1

0%

13%

En

viro

nmen

tal S

cien

ces

95

9

9

106

1

04

106

2%

12

%

Geol

ogic

al S

cien

ces

17

2

2

18

7

4

-4

3%

-76%

He

alth

Sci

ence

Pod

iatr

y 4

2

2

-

-

--

-1

00%

Chem

istr

y Ch

emis

try

104

1

12

118

1

27

145

14

%

39%

Ch

emis

try

- In

tegr

ated

Sci

ence

-

-

-

-

2

--

--

Ph

arm

aceu

tical

Sci

Adm

in T

rack

1

3

4

5

3

-4

0%

200%

Ph

arm

aceu

tical

Sci

ence

2

3

28

2

7

26

3

5

35%

52

%

Fore

nsic

Che

mis

try

Cert

ifica

te (C

ertifi

cate

) 2

-

-

1

2

10

0%

0%He

alth

Sci

ence

s He

alth

Sci

ence

Pre

-Occ

Thr

py

147

1

43

167

1

53

129

-1

6%

-12%

He

alth

Sci

ence

Pre

-Phy

s As

st

104

1

11

117

1

32

143

8%

38

%

Heal

th S

cien

ce P

re-P

hys

Thrp

y 2

08

219

2

38

240

1

82

-24%

-1

3%

Heal

th S

cien

ces

305

3

74

373

3

99

445

12

%

46%

He

alth

Sci

ence

s-Ph

ysic

al T

hpy

6

5

2

2

2

0%

-67%

Pr

e-He

alth

Scie

nce/

OccT

hpyP

rep

-

-

-

2

21

95

0%

--

Pre-

Heal

thSc

ienc

e/Ph

ysTh

pyPr

ep

-

-

-

2

35

16

50%

--

Cu

lture

Com

m &

Hea

lth C

ert (

Cert

ifica

te)

-

-

1

-

1

--

--

Gero

ntol

ogy

Cert

ifica

te (C

ertifi

cate

) 4

1

1

-

1

--

-7

5%M

athe

mat

ics

Mat

hem

atic

s 1

18

120

1

10

119

1

23

3%

4%

Mat

hem

atic

s -

Inte

grat

ed M

ath

-

-

-

-

7

--

--Ph

ysic

s Ph

ysic

s 4

6

49

5

2

42

4

5

7%

-2%

Ph

ysic

s -

Inte

grat

ed S

cien

ce

-

-

-

-

1

--

--Ps

ycho

logy

Ps

ycho

logy

6

76

724

7

72

731

6

73

-8%

0%

Spee

ch a

nd H

earin

g Sp

eech

& H

earin

g 1

10

127

1

25

111

1

12

1%

2%Ot

her S

cien

ce

Pre-

Dent

istr

y 3

5

50

6

0

43

5

4

26%

54

%

Pre-

Dent

istr

y (U

ndec

ided

) -

-

1

4

5

25

%

--

Pre-

Med

icin

e 2

00

312

3

50

356

3

90

10%

95

%

Pre-

Med

icin

e (U

ndec

ided

) -

-

8

3

1

54

74

%

--

Pre-

Phar

mac

y 9

4

110

8

7

46

6

3

37%

-3

3%

Pre-

Phar

mac

y (U

ndec

ided

) -

-

1

1

1

17

55

%

--

Pre-

Vete

rinar

y 2

4

27

3

3

28

3

4

21%

42

%

Pre-

Vete

rinar

y (U

ndec

ided

) -

-

-

4

8

10

0%

--

Scie

nce

Unde

cide

d 4

1

20

3

2

8

6

-25%

-8

5%

Colle

ge o

f Sci

ence

Cer

tifica

te (C

ertifi

cate

) 2

1

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Tota

l

2,87

3 3,

203

3,42

6 3,

352

3,46

1 3%

20

%


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

6: C

olle

ge o

f Sci

ence

s an

d H

ealt

h Pr

ofes

sion

s: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Fall

Term

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Grad

uate

(exc

ludi

ng D

octo

ral)

Biol

ogy,

Geol

ogy

and

Envi

ronm

enta

l Sci

ence

Bi

olog

y 3

1

25

1

7

15

1

8

20%

-4

2%

Envi

ronm

enta

l Sci

ence

8

9

9

1

0

5

-50%

-3

8%Ch

emis

try

Chem

istr

y 3

8

46

4

3

32

2

5

-22%

-3

4%He

alth

Sci

ence

s He

alth

Sci

ence

7

1

76

7

6

47

3

5

-26%

-5

1%

Heal

th S

cien

ce-

Phy.

A. T

rack

4

0

66

6

1

83

9

2

11%

13

0%

Mas

ter o

f Occ

upat

iona

l The

rapy

9

7

103

1

18

132

1

33

1%

37%

M

aste

r of P

ublic

Hea

lth

-

-

24

2

2

23

5%

--

Ph

ysic

s Op

tics

and

Med

ical

Img

1

2

2

1

-

-100

%

-100

%

Spee

ch P

atho

logy

and

Aud

5

3

54

5

3

53

5

9

11%

11

%

Gero

ntol

ogic

al S

tudi

es (C

ertifi

cate

) 1

-

1

1

1

0%

0%

Mat

hem

atic

s Ap

plie

d St

atis

tics

11

1

2

10

1

4

15

7%

36

%

Mat

hem

atic

s 3

6

35

3

1

29

3

0

3%

-17%

Phys

ics

Med

ical

Phy

sics

-

-

-

-

3

--

--

Ph

ysic

s 1

4

19

2

0

17

1

1

-35%

-2

1%

Phys

ics

Optic

s an

d M

ater

ials

-

-

-

-

3

--

--

M

edic

al P

hysi

cs (C

ertifi

cate

) -

-

-

-

2

--

--

Psyc

holo

gy

Psyc

holo

gy

3

4

2

1

2

100%

-3

3%

Psyc

holo

gy -

Clin

ical

2

8

24

1

7

21

2

4

14%

-1

4%

Psyc

holo

gy S

peci

alis

t 1

2

9

13

9

6

-3

3%

-50%

Ps

ycho

logy

-Div

ersi

ty M

gmt

20

2

3

15

1

5

12

-2

0%

-40%

Ps

ycho

logy

-Exp

erim

enta

l 1

2

17

1

1

14

1

2

-14%

0%

Ps

ycho

logy

-Indu

stria

l/Org

Rsc

h 1

7

13

1

0

11

1

3

18%

-2

4%

Psyc

holo

gy-S

choo

l 2

3

24

2

0

20

2

2

10%

-4

%

Dive

rsity

Man

agem

ent (

Cert

ifica

te)

-

2

1

2

-

-100

%

--Ot

her S

cien

ce

Grad

Col

l of S

cien

ce N

on-d

egre

(Non

-Deg

ree)

5

9

61

7

0

63

5

7

-10%

-3

%To

tal

57

5 62

4 62

4 61

2 60

3 -1

%

5%

Doct

oral

Biol

ogy,

Geol

ogy

and

Envi

ronm

enta

l Sci

ence

Re

gula

tory

Bio

logy

6

3

69

6

7

49

4

6

-6%

-2

7%Ch

emis

try

Clin

ical

Bio

anal

ytic

al C

hem

7

1

59

7

0

74

6

3

-15%

-1

1%He

alth

Sci

ence

s Do

ctor

of P

hysi

cal T

hera

py

91

1

03

111

1

10

105

-5

%

15%

Psyc

holo

gy

Adul

t Dev

elop

men

t & A

ging

PhD

4

7

8

9

8

-1

1%

100%

Tota

l

229

238

256

242

222

-8%

-3

%

Scie

nce

Tota

l

3,67

7 4,

065

4,30

6 4,

206

4,28

6 2%

17

%


Tabl

e 3.

7: C

olle

ge o

f Urb

an A

ffai

rs: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Fa

ll Te

rm

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Econ

omic

Dev

elop

men

t Ec

onom

ic D

evel

opm

ent

-

-

-

2

20

90

0%

--En

viro

nmen

tal S

tudi

es

Envi

ronm

enta

l Stu

dies

2

6

16

2

2

36

3

3

-8%

27

%No

npro

fit A

dmin

istr

atio

n &

Lead

ersh

ip

Nonp

rofit

Adm

inis

trat

ion

(LR)

9

7

2

3

6

10

0%

-33%

No

npro

fit A

dmin

istr

atio

n 7

7

60

6

4

82

7

7

-6%

0%

No

npro

fit A

dmin

istr

atio

n -

4+1

-

-

1

-

-

--

--Or

gani

zatio

nal L

eade

rshi

p Or

gani

zatio

nal L

eade

rshi

p 4

5

52

5

4

68

9

6

41%

11

3%

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip

(LK)

2

2

17

2

4

34

3

8

12%

73

%

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip

(Onl

ine)

-

-

-

-

3

--

--

Publ

ic S

afet

y M

anag

emen

t Pu

blic

Saf

ety

Man

agem

ent

39

4

4

48

4

6

35

-2

4%

-10%

Pu

blic

Saf

ety

Man

agem

ent (

LK)

10

1

3

5

8

60

%

-20%

Pu

blic

Saf

ety

Man

agem

ent (

LR)

4

3

3

2

5

150%

25

%Ur

ban

Stud

ies

Urba

n St

udie

s 1

33

129

1

08

108

1

01

-6%

-2

4%

Urba

n St

udie

s (L

K)

-

2

2

11

7

-3

6%

--

Urba

n St

udie

s (L

R)

13

8

5

8

1

3

63%

0%

Cert

ifica

te

Unde

rgra

d Ce

rt (C

ertifi

cate

) -

2

1

-

2

--

--

Tota

l

378

341

337

405

444

10%

17

%Gr

adua

te (e

xclu

ding

Doc

tora

l)

En

viro

nmen

tal S

tudi

es

Envi

ronm

enta

l Stu

dies

2

7

15

8

8

4

-5

0%

-85%

En

viro

nmen

tal S

tudi

es -

JD/

MAE

S -

-

-

-

1

Nonp

rofit

Adm

inis

trat

ion

& Le

ader

ship

No

npro

fit A

dmin

istr

atio

n &

Lead

ersh

ip

33

3

0

22

2

0

14

-3

0%

-58%

No

npro

fit A

dmin

istr

atio

n &

Lead

ersh

ip -

4+

1 -

1

-

1

-

-1

00%

--

Publ

ic A

dmin

istr

atio

n Pu

blic

Adm

inis

trat

ion

103

9

9

79

6

2

65

5%

-3

7%

Publ

ic A

dmin

istr

atio

n -

4+1

1

2

1

2

-

-100

%

-100

%

Publ

ic A

dmin

istr

atio

n -

JD/M

PA

-

-

-

-

1

--

--

Publ

ic A

dmin

- E

cono

mic

Dev

elop

men

t -

-

-

-

1

--

--

Pu

blic

Adm

in -

Hea

lth C

are

Adm

in

-

-

-

-

1

--

--

Publ

ic A

dmin

- N

onpr

ofit M

anag

emen

t -

-

-

-

4

--

--

Pu

blic

Adm

in -

Pub

lic F

inan

cial

Mgm

t -

-

-

-

1

--

--

Urba

n Pl

anni

ng

Urba

n Pl

anni

ng &

Dev

elop

men

t 5

6

46

3

6

41

4

9

20%

-1

3%

Urba

n Pl

anni

ng &

Dev

elop

men

t - J

D/M

UPD

-

1

1

-

2

--

--Ur

ban

Stud

ies

Urba

n St

udie

s 1

4

24

1

3

14

1

4

0%

0%Ce

rtifi

cate

Lo

cal a

nd U

rban

Man

agem

ent (

Cert

ifica

te)

-

1

-

-

3

--

--

Nonp

rofit

Man

agem

ent (

Cert

ifica

te)

3

3

2

5

4

-20%

33

%

Urba

n Ec

onom

ic D

evel

opm

ent (

Cert

ifica

te)

1

2

1

-

1

--

0%

Urba

n Ge

ogra

phic

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

(Cer

tifica

te)

3

3

-

-

2

--

-33%

Ur

ban

Real

Est

ate

Deve

lopm

ent &

Fin

ance

(Cer

tifica

te)

1

3

3

-

-

--

-100

%No

n-De

gree

No

n-De

gree

(Non

-Deg

ree)

5

3

25

5

3

38

3

8

0%

-28%

Tota

l

295

255

219

191

205

7%

-31%

Doct

oral

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

Urba

n St

udie

s 38

40

37

32

32

0%

-1

6%To

tal

38

40

37

32

32

0%

-1

6%

Urba

n Af

fairs

Tot

al

71

1 63

6 59

3 62

8 68

1 8%

-4

%

Not

e: C

Cer

tifica

te P

rogr

am


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

8: C

olle

ge o

f Law

: Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by L

evel

and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fa

ll Te

rm

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Law

La

w

553

4

97

442

4

05

375

-7

%

-32%

La

w a

nd E

nviro

nmen

tal S

tudi

es

3

1

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Law

and

Urb

an P

lann

ing

3

1

2

1

2

100%

-3

3%

Mas

ter o

f Law

s 5

5

1

0

10

1

1

10%

12

0%

Heal

th C

are

Com

plia

nce

(Cer

tifica

te)

-

-

-

-

2

--

--

Heal

th L

aw (C

ertifi

cate

) -

-

2

1

2

10

0%

--

Law

(Non

-Deg

ree)

2

-

2

-

1

--

-5

0%To

tal

56

6 50

4 45

8 41

7 39

3 -6

%

-31%

Grad

uate

Law

Le

gal S

tudi

es

- -

12

26

37

42%

--

Tota

l

12

26

37

42%

--

Law

Tot

al

56

6 50

4 47

0 44

3 43

0 -3

%

-24%

Tabl

e 3.

9: U

nder

grad

uate

Stu

dies

: Fa

ll En

rollm

ent

by L

evel

and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fall

Term

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e

Co

llege

Cre

dit P

lus

179

2

30

289

2

84

221

-2

2%

23%

Ex

plor

ator

y Nu

rsin

g 1

81

190

1

94

73

1

5

-79%

-9

2%

Pre-

Busi

ness

Adm

inis

trat

ion

18

2

5

24

1

8

26

44

%

44%

Pr

e-Co

llege

of E

ngin

eerin

g 3

8

5

7

1

8

157%

50

0%

Pre-

Educ

& H

uman

Ser

v (E

duc)

6

5

4

2

6

20

0%

0%

Pre-

Libe

ral A

rts

& So

cial

Sci

3

2

42

6

0

37

2

8

-24%

-1

3%

Pre-

Mus

ic

2

1

1

-

-

--

-100

%

Pre-

Scie

nce

20

2

3

22

1

6

18

13

%

-10%

Pr

e-So

cial

Wor

k 3

2

3

1

-

-1

00%

-1

00%

Pr

e-Ur

ban

Affa

irs

4

1

2

1

2

100%

-5

0%

Proj

ect 6

0 (N

on-D

egre

e)

262

2

12

214

2

31

227

-2

%

-13%

Se

nior

Yea

r Acc

eler

atio

n Pr

og

-

1

-

-

-

--

--

Tran

sitio

nal B

usin

ess

-

-

-

15

3

-8

0%

--

Tran

sitio

nal E

duca

tion

-

-

-

11

4

-6

4%

--

Tran

sitio

nal E

ngin

eerin

g -

-

-

2

3

19

-1

7%

--

Tran

sitio

nal E

xplo

rato

ry

-

-

-

121

3

67

203%

--

Tr

ansi

tiona

l Lib

Art

s/So

c Sc

i -

-

-

1

3

10

-2

3%

--

Tran

sitio

nal N

ursi

ng

-

-

-

72

9

3

29%

--

Tr

ansi

tiona

l Sci

ence

-

-

-

6

8

33

%

--

Tran

sitio

nal U

rban

-

-

-

4

5

25

%

--

Univ

ersi

ty S

tudi

es U

ndec

ided

3

0

43

4

7

33

2

5

-24%

-1

7%Un

derg

radu

ate

Stud

ies

Tota

l

740

783

865

968

1,09

5 13

%

48%


Tabl

e 3.

10: U

nder

grad

uate

Non

-Deg

ree:

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by L

evel

and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e No

n-De

gree

Cr

oss

Regi

stra

tion

Unde

rgra

duat

e 1

7

11

1

4

12

1

5

25%

-1

2%

Nond

egre

e Po

st-b

acca

laur

eate

-

-

1

-

-

--

--

No

ndeg

ree

Unde

rgra

duat

e 1

84

183

1

69

119

1

56

31%

-1

5%

Ugrd

Tra

nsie

nt

42

4

6

37

3

9

39

0%

-7

%

Visi

ting

32

5

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Na

tiona

l Stu

dent

Exc

hang

e 1

2

-

-

1

--

0%

Unde

rgra

duat

e No

n-De

gree

Tot

al

27

6 24

7 22

1 17

0 21

1 24

%

-24%

Tabl

e 3.

11: G

radu

ate

Stud

ies:

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by L

evel

and

Maj

or, 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Grad

uate

(exc

ludi

ng D

octo

ral)

Gr

adua

te N

on-d

egre

e Gr

adua

te N

on-d

egre

e 1

3

12

6

3

3

0%

-7

7%

Cros

s Re

gist

ratio

n Gr

adua

te

-

-

13

1

4

16

14

%

--

Grad

Tra

nsie

nt

11

9

1

0

7

4

-43%

-6

4%Gr

adua

te S

tudi

es T

otal

24

21

29

24

23

-4%

-4

%

Tabl

e 3.

11a:

Oth

er: F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Lev

el a

nd M

ajor

, 5-Y

ear T

rend

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Depa

rtm

ent/

Prog

ram

De

scrip

tion

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 ye

ar

5 y

ear

Unde

rgra

duat

e

ESL

Inte

nsiv

e La

ngua

ge P

rogr

am

ESL

Inte

nsiv

e La

ngua

ge P

rogr

am

148

163

150

152

122

-20%

-1

8%To

tal

14

8 16

3 15

0 15

2 12

2 -2

0%

-18%

Not

e: E

SL

= E

nglis

h as

a S

econ

d La

ngua

ge


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

12: C

olle

ge o

f Bus

ines

s

Fall

Enro

llmen

t by

Cla

ss S

tand

ing

and

Stud

ent

Cre

dit

Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

Tabl

e 3.

12a:

Enr

ollm

ent b

y Cl

ass

Stan

ding

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Fres

hmen

278

8%

3

20

9%

399

12

%

385

11

%

379

13

%

-2%

36

%So

phom

ores

315

9%

2

65

8%

232

7%

3

78

11%

3

57

12%

-6

%

13%

Juni

ors

4

59

13%

4

10

12%

3

87

12%

4

72

14%

4

47

15%

-5

%

-3%

Seni

ors

1

,010

29

%

978

29

%

923

28

%

1,0

10

29%

8

95

30%

-1

1%

-11%

Mas

ter’s

1,3

81

40%

1

,366

41

%

1,3

07

40%

1

,161

34

%

901

30

%

-22%

-3

5%Do

ctor

al

3

8

1%

30

1%

5

3

2%

42

1%

3

0

1%

-29%

-2

1%Gr

and

Tota

l

3,4

81

100%

3

,369

10

0%

3,3

01

100%

3

,448

10

0%

3,0

09

100%

-1

3%

-14%

Ta

ble

3.12

b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y Co

urse

Lev

el

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Clas

s Le

vel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Low

er

5

,525

20

%

5,3

63

20%

5

,839

21

%

6,5

44

24%

6

,233

24

%

-5%

13

%

Uppe

r

11,

449

42

%

11,

530

43

%

11,

420

42

%

11,

805

44

%

12,

533

49

%

6%

9%

Mas

ter’s

9,9

74

37%

9

,864

37

%

9,7

45

36%

8

,493

31

%

6,6

14

26%

-2

2%

-34%

Doct

oral

208

1%

1

32

0%

272

1%

1

88

1%

139

1%

-2

6%

-33%

Gran

d To

tal

2

7,15

6

100%

2

6,88

9

100%

2

7,27

6

100%

2

7,03

0

100%

2

5,51

9

100%

-6

%

-6%

Figu

re 3

.12a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

3.1

2b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel


Tabl

e 3.

13:

Col

lege

of L

iber

al A

rts

and

Soci

al S

cien

ces

Fa

ll En

rollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

g &

Stu

dent

Cre

dit

Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

Tabl

e 3.

13a:

Enr

ollm

ent b

y Cl

ass

Stan

ding

P

erce

nt C

hang

e

Clas

s St

andi

ng

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Fres

hmen

7

93

21%

7

59

20%

7

57

21%

6

17

19%

4

90

16%

-2

1%

-38%

Soph

omor

es

500

13

%

534

14

%

584

16

%

477

15

%

431

14

%

-10%

-1

4%Ju

nior

s 6

40

17%

6

73

18%

6

87

19%

6

42

20%

6

33

21%

-1

%

-1%

Seni

ors

1,2

00

32%

1

,169

31

%

1,1

14

30%

9

79

30%

9

44

32%

-4

%

-21%

Mas

ter’s

6

03

16%

5

96

16%

5

49

15%

5

37

17%

4

81

16%

-1

0%

-20%

Gran

d To

tal

3,7

36

100%

3

,731

10

0%

3,6

91

100%

3

,252

10

0%

2,9

79

100%

-8

%

-20%

Tabl

e 3.

13b:

Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cour

se L

evel

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Deve

lopm

enta

l 3

82

1%

394

1%

3

86

1%

370

1%

4

18

1%

13%

9%

Low

er

34,

411

60

%

35,

976

61

%

37,

504

62

%

35,

074

64

%

35,

799

64

%

2%

4%Up

per

17,

586

30

%

17,

347

29

%

17,

860

30

%

14,

928

27

%

15,

105

27

%

1%

-14%

Mas

ter’s

5

,355

9%

5

,083

9%

4

,662

8%

4

,859

9%

4

,185

8%

-1

4%

-22%

Doct

oral

2

4

0%

8

0%

4

0%

-

0%

4

0%

--

-83%

Gran

d To

tal

57,

758

10

0%

58,

808

10

0%

60,

416

10

0%

55,

231

10

0%

55,

511

10

0%

1%

-4%

Figu

re 3

.13a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

3.1

3b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

14:

Col

lege

of E

duca

tion

and

Hum

an S

ervi

ces

Fa

ll En

rollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

g &

Stu

dent

Cre

dit

Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

Ta

ble

3.14

a: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Clas

s St

andi

ng

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Fres

hmen

1

56

6%

120

5%

1

49

7%

115

6%

1

35

7%

17%

-1

3%So

phom

ores

1

11

5%

135

6%

1

14

5%

109

5%

1

09

6%

0%

-2%

Juni

ors

173

7%

1

58

7%

193

9%

1

55

8%

162

8%

5%

-6

%Se

nior

s 5

27

22%

4

84

21%

4

48

20%

4

24

21%

4

05

21%

-4

%

-23%

Mas

ter’s

1

,365

56

%

1,2

57

55%

1

,253

55

%

1,1

53

56%

1

,048

54

%

-9%

-2

3%Do

ctor

al

119

5%

1

12

5%

102

5%

9

6

5%

93

5%

-3

%

-22%

Tota

l 2

,451

10

0%

2,2

66

100%

2

,259

10

0%

2,0

52

100%

1

,952

10

0%

-5%

-2

0%

Tabl

e 3.

14b:

Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cour

se L

evel

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Low

er

1,0

35

6%

981

6%

1

,501

9%

1

,451

10

%

1,2

08

8%

-17%

17

%Up

per

6,2

50

38%

6

,360

39

%

5,9

38

37%

5

,721

38

%

6,3

84

42%

12

%

2%M

aste

r’s

8,4

16

51%

7

,925

49

%

7,8

84

49%

7

,168

48

%

6,8

86

46%

-4

%

-18%

Doct

oral

8

41

5%

899

6%

9

01

6%

669

4%

6

38

4%

-5%

-2

4%To

tal

16,

542

10

0%

16,

165

10

0%

16,

224

10

0%

15,

009

10

0%

15,

116

10

0%

1%

-9%

Figu

re 3

.14a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

3.1

4b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel


Figu

re 3

.15a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

3.1

5b: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Cou

rse

Leve

l

Tabl

e 3.

15:

Scho

ol o

f Nur

sing

Fa

ll En

rollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

g &

Stu

dent

Cre

dit

Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

Ta

ble

3.15

a: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Clas

s St

andi

ng

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Fres

hmen

1

14

20%

1

33

22%

1

56

25%

1

41

24%

1

60

27%

13

%

40%

Soph

omor

es

71

13

%

88

15

%

101

16

%

101

17

%

85

14

%

-16%

20

%Ju

nior

s 9

2

16%

8

9

15%

8

8

14%

8

2

14%

7

1

12%

-1

3%

-23%

Seni

ors

223

40

%

224

38

%

228

36

%

225

38

%

223

38

%

-1%

0%

Mas

ter’s

5

9

11%

5

8

10%

5

5

9%

51

9%

5

0

8%

-2%

-1

5%To

tal

559

10

0%

592

10

0%

628

10

0%

600

10

0%

589

10

0%

-2%

5%

Tabl

e 3.

15b:

Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cour

se L

evel

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Low

er

1,0

97

25%

1

,041

23

%

1,0

56

23%

1

,005

23

%

1,0

92

24%

9%

0%

Uppe

r 3

,011

68

%

3,1

92

70%

3

,177

70

%

3,0

92

71%

3

,207

70

%

4%

7%M

aste

r’s

303

7%

3

31

7%

328

7%

2

67

6%

266

6%

0%

-1

2%Do

ctor

al

-

0%

-

0%

8

0%

-

0%

-

0%

- -

Tota

l 4

,411

10

0%

4,5

64

100%

4

,569

10

0%

4,3

64

100%

4

,565

10

0%

5%

3%


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

16:

Col

lege

of E

ngin

eeri

ng

Fall

Enro

llmen

t by

Cla

ss S

tand

ing

& S

tude

nt C

redi

t H

ours

by

Cou

rse

Leve

l: 5-

Year

Tre

nd

Tabl

e 3.

16a:

Enr

ollm

ent b

y Cl

ass

Stan

ding

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Clas

s St

andi

ng

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Fres

hmen

2

55

18%

3

31

21%

3

59

20%

3

38

17%

4

14

16%

22

%

62%

Soph

omor

es

147

10

%

200

13

%

244

14

%

233

12

%

301

12

%

29%

10

5%Ju

nior

s 1

76

12%

2

13

14%

2

60

15%

2

89

15%

3

54

14%

22

%

101%

Seni

ors

419

29

%

422

27

%

452

26

%

529

27

%

740

29

%

40%

77

%M

aste

r’s

388

27

%

335

21

%

391

22

%

489

25

%

646

26

%

32%

66

%Do

ctor

al

67

5%

6

8

4%

65

4%

7

0

4%

72

3%

3%

7%

Tota

l 1

,452

10

0%

1,5

69

100%

1

,771

10

0%

1,9

48

100%

2

,527

10

0%

30%

74

%

Tabl

e 3.

16b:

Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cour

se L

evel

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Low

er

2,1

64

21%

2

,507

25

%

3,1

67

27%

4

,138

29

%

5,4

44

28%

32

%

152%

Uppe

r 5

,183

50

%

4,8

76

48%

5

,287

46

%

5,7

63

41%

7

,930

41

%

38%

53

%M

aste

r’s

2,5

33

25%

2

,281

23

%

2,8

31

24%

3

,905

28

%

5,6

51

29%

45

%

123%

Doct

oral

4

10

4%

390

4%

2

87

2%

386

3%

3

89

2%

1%

-5%

Tota

l 1

0,29

0

100%

1

0,05

4

100%

1

1,57

2

100%

1

4,19

2

100%

1

9,41

4

100%

37

%

89%

Figu

re 3

.16b

: Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cou

rse

Leve

lFi

gure

3.1

6a: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Cla

ss S

tand

ing


Tabl

e 3.

17:

Col

lege

of S

cien

ces

& H

ealt

h Pr

ofes

sion

s

Fa

ll En

rollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

g &

Stu

dent

Cre

dit

Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

Ta

ble

3.17

a: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Clas

s St

andi

ng

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Fres

hmen

4

72

14%

5

71

15%

6

29

16%

5

13

14%

5

83

16%

14

%

24%

Soph

omor

es

464

14

%

471

13

%

510

13

%

512

14

%

496

13

%

-3%

7%

Juni

ors

541

16

%

624

17

%

630

16

%

644

17

%

663

18

%

3%

23%

Seni

ors

1,1

01

33%

1

,210

32

%

1,2

25

32%

1

,175

32

%

1,1

27

31%

-4

%

2%M

aste

r’s

566

17

%

617

17

%

594

15

%

602

16

%

599

16

%

0%

6%Do

ctor

al

224

7%

2

34

6%

253

7%

2

41

7%

221

6%

-8

%

-1%

Tota

l

3,36

8

100%

3

,727

10

0%

3,8

41

100%

3

,687

10

0%

3,6

89

100%

0%

10

%

Tabl

e 3.

17b:

Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cour

se L

evel

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Deve

lopm

enta

l 2

,564

5%

2

,232

4%

2

,464

4%

1

,485

3%

1

,365

2%

-8

%

-47%

Low

er

28,

700

55

%

31,

226

55

%

33,

589

56

%

31,

561

58

%

34,

173

59

%

8%

19%

Uppe

r 1

4,10

9

27%

1

5,45

8

27%

1

6,14

7

27%

1

4,19

8

26%

1

4,71

0

26%

4%

4%

Mas

ter’s

5

,611

11

%

5,7

69

10%

5

,511

9%

5

,478

10

%

5,6

16

10%

3%

0%

Doct

oral

1

,576

3%

1

,676

3%

1

,883

3%

1

,834

3%

1

,761

3%

-4

%

12%

Tota

l 5

2,56

0

100%

5

6,36

1

100%

5

9,59

4

100%

5

4,55

6

100%

5

7,62

5

100%

6%

10

%

Figu

re 3

.17b

: Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cou

rse

Leve

lFi

gure

3.1

7a: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Cla

ss S

tand

ing


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

18:

Col

lege

of U

rban

Aff

airs

Fa

ll En

rollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

g &

Stu

dent

Cre

dit

Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

Ta

ble

3.18

a: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Clas

s St

andi

ng

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Fres

hmen

3

1

4%

31

5%

2

0

3%

27

4%

2

8

4%

4%

-10%

Soph

omor

es

44

6%

3

8

6%

35

6%

5

4

9%

51

8%

-6

%

16%

Juni

ors

83

12

%

91

15

%

105

18

%

107

18

%

137

21

%

28%

65

%Se

nior

s 2

02

29%

1

67

27%

1

64

28%

1

99

33%

2

06

32%

4%

2%

Mas

ter’s

2

91

42%

2

53

41%

2

16

38%

1

87

31%

1

99

30%

6%

-3

2%Do

ctor

al

38

6%

4

0

6%

36

6%

3

2

5%

32

5%

0%

-1

6%To

tal

689

10

0%

620

10

0%

576

10

0%

606

10

0%

653

10

0%

8%

-5%

Tabl

e 3.

18b:

Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cour

se L

evel

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Low

er

4,8

09

44%

4

,811

47

%

4,8

44

48%

3

,980

45

%

3,9

00

43%

-2

%

-19%

Uppe

r 3

,582

33

%

3,1

88

31%

3

,303

32

%

3,1

48

35%

3

,309

36

%

5%

-8%

Mas

ter’s

2

,439

22

%

2,0

45

20%

1

,818

18

%

1,5

77

18%

1

,736

19

%

10%

-2

9%Do

ctor

al

179

2%

2

01

2%

211

2%

1

65

2%

126

1%

-2

4%

-30%

Tota

l 1

1,00

9

100%

1

0,24

5

100%

1

0,17

6

100%

8

,870

10

0%

9,0

71

100%

2%

-1

8%

Figu

re 3

.18a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

3.1

8b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel


Tabl

e 3.

19:

Col

lege

of L

aw

Fall

Enro

llmen

t by

Cla

ss S

tand

ing

& S

tude

nt C

redi

t H

ours

by

Cou

rse

Leve

l: 5-

Year

Tre

nd

Tabl

e 3.

19a:

Enr

ollm

ent b

y Cl

ass

Stan

ding

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

2011

%

20

12

%

2013

%

20

14

%

2015

%

1

Year

5

Year

Law

56

3 10

0%

501

100%

46

9 10

0%

442

100%

42

8 10

0%

-3%

-2

4%To

tal

563

100%

50

1 10

0%

469

100%

44

2 10

0%

428

100%

-3

%

-24%

Ta

ble

3.19

b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y Co

urse

Lev

el

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Law

7

,425

10

0%

6,7

76

100%

6

,116

10

0%

5,7

20

100%

5

,282

10

0%

-8%

-2

9%To

tal

7,4

25

100%

6

,776

10

0%

6,1

16

100%

5

,720

10

0%

5,2

82

100%

-8

%

-29%

Figu

re 3

.19a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

3.1

9b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

20:

Und

ergr

adua

te S

tudi

es

Fall

Enro

llmen

t by

Cla

ss S

tand

ing

& S

tude

nt C

redi

t H

ours

by

Cou

rse

Leve

l: 5-

Year

Tre

nd

Ta

ble

3.20

a: E

nrol

lmen

t by

Clas

s St

andi

ng

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Clas

s St

andi

ng

2011

%

20

12

%

2013

%

20

14

%

2015

%

1

Year

5

Year

Fres

hmen

5

62

76%

6

05

78%

6

32

73%

7

28

75%

8

45

77%

16

%

50%

Soph

omor

es

97

13

%

94

12

%

110

13

%

142

15

%

126

12

%

-11%

30

%Ju

nior

s 2

9

4%

36

5%

5

6

6%

52

5%

6

5

6%

25%

12

4%Se

nior

s 5

1

7%

45

6%

6

5

8%

43

4%

5

8

5%

35%

14

%To

tal

739

10

0%

780

10

0%

863

10

0%

965

10

0%

1,0

94

100%

13

%

48%

Tabl

e 3.

20b:

Stu

dent

Cre

dit H

ours

by

Cour

se L

evel

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Cour

se L

evel

20

11

%

2012

%

20

13

%

2014

%

20

15

%

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Low

er

1,1

90

100%

1

,419

10

0%

1,5

96

100%

1

,427

10

0%

1,4

99

100%

5%

26

%To

tal

1,1

90

100%

1

,419

10

0%

1,5

96

100%

1

,427

10

0%

1,4

99

100%

5%

26

%

Figu

re 3

.20a

: Enr

ollm

ent

by C

lass

Sta

ndin

gFi

gure

3.2

0b: S

tude

nt C

redi

t Hou

rs b

y C

ours

e Le

vel


Tabl

e 3.

21: C

SU T

otal

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by C

olle

ge a

nd E

thni

city

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Busi

ness

Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

6

0%

6

0%

4

0%

3

0%

5

0%

67%

-1

7%

Asia

n

144

4%

1

28

4%

122

4%

1

51

4%

126

4%

-1

7%

-13%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

547

16

%

514

15

%

462

14

%

466

14

%

405

13

%

-13%

-2

6%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

96

3%

1

08

3%

116

4%

1

27

4%

120

4%

-6

%

25%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

3

0%

3

0%

5

0%

4

0%

2

0%

-50%

-3

3%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

357

10

%

396

12

%

459

14

%

427

12

%

305

10

%

-29%

-1

5%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

30

1%

3

8

1%

50

2%

6

2

2%

57

2%

-8

%

90%

Un

know

n

173

5%

1

30

4%

75

2%

7

3

2%

55

2%

-2

5%

-68%

W

hite

2,1

25

61%

2

,046

61

%

2,0

08

61%

2

,135

62

%

1,9

34

64%

-9

%

-9%

Busi

ness

Tot

al

3,4

81

100%

3

,369

10

0%

3,3

01

100%

3

,448

10

0%

3,0

09

100%

-1

3%

-14%

CLAS

S Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e 7

0%

1

1

0%

9

0%

4

0%

7

0%

75%

0%

As

ian

5

3

1%

50

1%

6

3

2%

44

1%

3

2

1%

-27%

-4

0%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

9

40

25%

9

29

25%

9

07

25%

8

29

25%

7

60

26%

-8

%

-19%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

1

71

5%

186

5%

2

13

6%

190

6%

1

73

6%

-9%

1%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

1

0%

3

0%

3

0%

3

0%

4

0%

33%

30

0%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

54

1%

5

8

2%

52

1%

5

1

2%

53

2%

4%

-2

%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

66

2%

9

3

2%

108

3%

1

21

4%

106

4%

-1

2%

61%

Un

know

n

225

6%

1

88

5%

139

4%

8

0

2%

42

1%

-4

8%

-81%

W

hite

2,2

19

59%

2

,213

59

%

2,1

97

60%

1

,930

59

%

1,8

02

60%

-7

%

-19%

CLAS

S To

tal

3

,736

10

0%

3,7

31

100%

3

,691

10

0%

3,2

52

100%

2

,979

10

0%

-8%

-2

0%Ed

ucat

ion

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

3

0%

1

0%

3

0%

6

0%

4

0%

-3

3%

33%

As

ian

2

5

1%

20

1%

2

0

1%

23

1%

1

6

1%

-30%

-3

6%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

5

87

24%

5

33

24%

5

03

22%

4

77

23%

4

79

25%

0%

-1

8%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

74

3%

7

5

3%

83

4%

8

5

4%

82

4%

-4

%

11%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

2

0%

2

0%

2

0%

4

0%

4

0%

0%

100%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

6

1

2%

65

3%

8

9

4%

98

5%

1

03

5%

5%

69%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

2

1

1%

26

1%

4

0

2%

42

2%

4

6

2%

10%

11

9%

Unkn

own

1

98

8%

141

6%

8

0

4%

62

3%

3

9

2%

-37%

-8

0%

Whi

te

1

,480

60

%

1,4

03

62%

1

,439

64

%

1,2

55

61%

1

,179

60

%

-6%

-2

0%Ed

ucat

ion

Tota

l 2

,451

10

0%

2,2

66

100%

2

,259

10

0%

2,0

52

100%

1

,952

10

0%

-5%

-2

0%En

gine

erin

g Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

2

0%

1

0%

-

0%

1

0%

4

0%

300%

10

0%

Asia

n

53

4%

5

4

3%

58

3%

6

3

3%

99

4%

57

%

87%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

111

8%

1

20

8%

119

7%

1

27

7%

151

6%

19

%

36%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

3

8

3%

48

3%

5

4

3%

56

3%

7

7

3%

38%

10

3%

Nativ

e Ha

wai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nd

3

0%

2

0%

1

0%

1

0%

1

0%

0%

-6

7%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

364

25

%

369

24

%

508

29

%

639

33

%

857

34

%

34%

13

5%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

13

1%

1

6

1%

25

1%

3

1

2%

41

2%

32

%

215%

Un

know

n

93

6%

6

3

4%

59

3%

3

9

2%

40

2%

3%

-5

7%

Whi

te

7

75

53%

8

96

57%

9

47

53%

9

91

51%

1

,257

50

%

27%

62

%En

gine

erin

g To

tal

1,4

52

100%

1

,569

10

0%

1,7

71

100%

1

,948

10

0%

2,5

27

100%

30

%

74%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Sec

tio

n

3

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age

Ta

ble

3.21

: CSU

Tot

al F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

and

Eth

nici

ty: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Grad

uate

As

ian

2

9%

2

11

%

4

14%

1

4%

-

0%

-1

00%

-1

00%

Stud

ies

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

4

17

%

2

11%

2

7%

1

4%

3

13

%

200%

-2

5%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

1

4%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

- -1

00%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

-

0%

-

0%

1

4%

1

4%

1

4%

0%

-

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

-

0%

1

5%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-

Unkn

own

5

22

%

1

5%

14

50

%

15

63

%

17

74

%

13%

24

0%

Whi

te

1

1

48%

1

3

68%

7

25

%

6

25%

2

9%

-6

7%

-82%

Grad

uate

Stu

dies

Tot

al

23

10

0%

19

10

0%

28

10

0%

24

10

0%

23

10

0%

-4%

0%

Law

Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

1

0%

1

0%

3

1%

2

0%

2

0%

0%

100%

As

ian

1

4

2%

12

2%

1

4

3%

8

2%

10

2%

25

%

-29%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

54

10

%

40

8%

4

1

9%

36

8%

4

0

9%

11%

-2

6%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

17

3%

2

0

4%

21

4%

1

6

4%

21

5%

31

%

24%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

6

1%

7

1%

9

2%

9

2%

6

1%

-3

3%

0%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

2

0%

5

1%

8

2%

8

2%

10

2%

25

%

400%

Un

know

n

15

3%

9

2%

1

1

2%

13

3%

1

6

4%

23%

7%

W

hite

454

81

%

407

81

%

362

77

%

350

79

%

323

75

%

-8%

-2

9%La

w T

otal

563

10

0%

501

10

0%

469

10

0%

442

10

0%

428

10

0%

-3%

-2

4%Nu

rsin

g Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

1

0%

-

0%

1

0%

1

0%

1

0%

0%

0%

Asia

n

20

4%

2

1

4%

18

3%

1

9

3%

29

5%

53

%

45%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

77

14

%

79

13

%

86

14

%

80

13

%

63

11

%

-21%

-1

8%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

21

4%

2

3

4%

34

5%

2

7

5%

26

4%

-4

%

24%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

-

0%

1

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

- -

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

7

1%

1

2

2%

15

2%

1

4

2%

7

1%

-50%

0%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

1

2

2%

14

2%

1

8

3%

15

3%

1

7

3%

13%

42

%

Unkn

own

2

4

4%

18

3%

1

0

2%

6

1%

7

1%

17%

-7

1%

Whi

te

3

97

71%

4

24

72%

4

45

71%

4

38

73%

4

39

75%

0%

11

%Nu

rsin

g To

tal

5

59

100%

5

92

100%

6

28

100%

6

00

100%

5

89

100%

-2

%

5%Ot

her

Asia

n

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

1

1%

- -

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

1

11

99%

1

04

98%

8

2

99%

1

49

99%

1

15

98%

-2

3%

4%

Unkn

own

1

1%

2

2%

-

0%

1

1%

-

0%

-1

00%

-1

00%

W

hite

-

0%

-

0%

1

1%

1

1%

1

1%

0%

-Ot

her T

otal

112

10

0%

106

10

0%

83

10

0%

151

10

0%

117

10

0%

-23%

4%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age

Ta

ble

3.21

: CSU

Tot

al F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

and

Eth

nici

ty: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Scie

nce

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

13

0%

1

3

0%

10

0%

8

0%

1

0

0%

25%

-2

3%

Asia

n

102

3%

1

13

3%

116

3%

1

36

4%

152

4%

12

%

49%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

516

15

%

573

15

%

556

14

%

529

14

%

542

15

%

2%

5%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

102

3%

1

27

3%

143

4%

1

48

4%

179

5%

21

%

75%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

2

0%

6

0%

2

0%

5

0%

7

0%

40

%

250%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

1

82

5%

192

5%

1

98

5%

173

5%

1

56

4%

-10%

-1

4%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

52

2%

9

5

3%

100

3%

1

18

3%

118

3%

0%

12

7%

Unkn

own

1

87

6%

153

4%

1

12

3%

86

2%

7

9

2%

-8%

-5

8%

Whi

te

2

,212

66

%

2,4

55

66%

2

,604

68

%

2,4

84

67%

2

,446

66

%

-2%

11

%Sc

ienc

e To

tal

3

,368

10

0%

3,7

27

100%

3

,841

10

0%

3,6

87

100%

3

,689

10

0%

0%

10%

Unde

rgra

duat

e As

ian

1

5

5%

15

6%

1

1

5%

13

8%

8

4%

-3

8%

-47%

Non-

Degr

ee

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

1

5

5%

26

11

%

26

12

%

21

12

%

22

11

%

5%

47%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

1

0

4%

7

3%

10

5%

8

5%

8

4%

0%

-2

0%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

3

1%

2

1%

4

2%

3

2%

14

7%

36

7%

367%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

3

1%

2

1%

4

2%

3

2%

7

3%

13

3%

133%

Un

know

n

43

16

%

22

9%

1

5

7%

13

8%

1

8

9%

38%

-5

8%

Whi

te

1

85

68%

1

71

70%

1

50

68%

1

09

64%

1

32

63%

21

%

-29%

Unde

rgra

duat

e No

n-De

gree

Tot

al

274

10

0%

245

10

0%

220

10

0%

170

10

0%

209

10

0%

23%

-2

4%Un

derg

radu

ate

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

1

0%

3

0%

1

0%

1

0%

4

0%

30

0%

300%

Stud

ies

Asia

n

38

5%

3

4

4%

40

5%

4

6

5%

52

5%

13

%

37%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

190

26

%

227

29

%

242

28

%

236

24

%

236

22

%

0%

24%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

3

4

5%

24

3%

3

1

4%

46

5%

4

9

4%

7%

44%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

-

0%

1

0%

1

0%

-

0%

2

0%

-

-

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

9

1%

7

1%

5

1%

6

1%

5

0%

-17%

-4

4%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

18

2%

2

1

3%

21

2%

2

4

2%

40

4%

67

%

122%

Un

know

n

107

14

%

84

11

%

95

11

%

105

11

%

117

11

%

11%

9%

W

hite

342

46

%

379

49

%

427

49

%

501

52

%

589

54

%

18%

72

%Un

derg

radu

ate

Stud

ies

Tota

l 7

39

100%

7

80

100%

8

63

100%

9

65

100%

1

,094

10

0%

13%

48

%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Sec

tio

n

3

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age

Ta

ble

3.21

: CSU

Tot

al F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

and

Eth

nici

ty: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Urba

n Af

fairs

Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

2

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

1

0%

- -5

0%

Asia

n

3

0%

5

1%

7

1%

7

1%

6

1%

-14%

10

0%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

178

26

%

161

26

%

163

28

%

156

26

%

178

27

%

14%

0%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

2

2

3%

18

3%

1

6

3%

28

5%

3

4

5%

21%

55

%

Nativ

e Ha

wai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nd

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-100

%

-100

%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

31

4%

3

1

5%

26

5%

2

4

4%

25

4%

4%

-1

9%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

6

1%

7

1%

10

2%

1

1

2%

14

2%

27

%

133%

Un

know

n

51

7%

3

3

5%

19

3%

1

6

3%

7

1%

-56%

-8

6%

Whi

te

3

95

57%

3

64

59%

3

35

58%

3

63

60%

3

88

59%

7%

-2

%Ur

ban

Affa

irs T

otal

6

89

100%

6

20

100%

5

76

100%

6

06

100%

6

53

100%

8%

-5

%

Gran

d To

tal

1

7,44

7

1

7,52

5

1

7,73

0

1

7,34

5

1

7,26

9

0%

-1

%


Tabl

e 3.

22:

CSU

Und

ergr

adua

te F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

& E

thni

city

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

year

5

yea

r

Busi

ness

Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

6

0%

3

0%

1

0%

2

0%

5

0%

150%

-1

7%

Asia

n

77

4%

7

2

4%

62

3%

8

8

4%

74

4%

-1

6%

-4%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

423

21

%

366

19

%

327

17

%

329

15

%

287

14

%

-13%

-3

2%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

68

3%

7

2

4%

82

4%

9

5

4%

91

4%

-4

%

34%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

3

0%

3

0%

5

0%

4

0%

2

0%

-5

0%

-33%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

1

12

5%

130

7%

1

56

8%

163

7%

1

51

7%

-7%

35

%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

18

1%

3

0

2%

34

2%

4

5

2%

43

2%

-4

%

139%

Un

know

n

99

5%

6

9

3%

43

2%

4

2

2%

34

2%

-1

9%

-66%

W

hite

1,2

56

61%

1

,228

62

%

1,2

31

63%

1

,477

66

%

1,3

91

67%

-6

%

11%

Busi

ness

Tot

al

2,0

62

100%

1

,973

10

0%

1,9

41

100%

2

,245

10

0%

2,0

78

100%

-7

%

1%CL

ASS

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

7

0%

1

1

0%

8

0%

3

0%

7

0%

133%

0%

As

ian

4

7

2%

45

1%

5

5

2%

38

1%

2

8

1%

-26%

-4

0%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

8

13

26%

7

86

25%

7

45

24%

6

66

25%

6

26

25%

-6

%

-23%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

1

57

5%

168

5%

1

91

6%

167

6%

1

48

6%

-11%

-6

%

Nativ

e Ha

wai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nd

1

0%

3

0%

3

0%

3

0%

4

0%

33%

30

0%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

37

1%

4

0

1%

36

1%

3

0

1%

28

1%

-7

%

-24%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

6

2

2%

85

3%

1

03

3%

108

4%

9

5

4%

-12%

53

%

Unkn

own

1

64

5%

145

5%

1

15

4%

66

2%

3

7

1%

-44%

-7

7%

Whi

te

1

,845

59

%

1,8

52

59%

1

,886

60

%

1,6

34

60%

1

,525

61

%

-7%

-1

7%CL

ASS

Tota

l

3,1

33

100%

3

,135

10

0%

3,1

42

100%

2

,715

10

0%

2,4

98

100%

-8

%

-20%

Educ

atio

n Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

2

0%

1

0%

3

0%

4

0%

3

0%

-25%

50

%

Asia

n

7

1%

6

1%

7

1%

8

1%

5

1%

-38%

-2

9%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

2

28

24%

2

14

24%

1

96

22%

1

62

20%

1

66

20%

2%

-2

7%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

34

4%

4

1

5%

47

5%

4

7

6%

43

5%

-9

%

26%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

1

0%

1

0%

1

0%

2

0%

2

0%

0%

10

0%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

6

1%

12

1%

1

3

1%

11

1%

1

1

1%

0%

83%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

1

1

1%

13

1%

2

2

2%

24

3%

2

5

3%

4%

127%

Un

know

n

45

5%

3

5

4%

23

3%

1

7

2%

14

2%

-1

8%

-69%

W

hite

633

65

%

574

64

%

592

65

%

528

66

%

542

67

%

3%

-14%

Educ

atio

n To

tal

967

10

0%

897

10

0%

904

10

0%

803

10

0%

811

10

0%

1%

-16%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

22:

CSU

Und

ergr

adua

te F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

& E

thni

city

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Engi

neer

ing

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

1

0%

4

0%

30

0%

-

Asia

n

34

3%

3

5

3%

40

3%

5

0

4%

82

5%

64

%

141%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

97

10%

1

09

9%

103

8%

1

12

8%

138

8%

23

%

42%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

3

4

3%

40

3%

4

9

4%

49

4%

7

4

4%

51%

11

8%

Nativ

e Ha

wai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nd

2

0%

1

0%

1

0%

1

0%

1

0%

0%

-50%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

1

17

12%

1

77

15%

2

62

20%

2

93

21%

3

55

20%

21

%

203%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

1

3

1%

16

1%

2

2

2%

26

2%

3

7

2%

42%

18

5%

Unkn

own

6

3

6%

41

4%

4

0

3%

24

2%

2

8

2%

17%

-5

6%

Whi

te

6

37

64%

7

47

64%

7

98

61%

8

33

60%

1

,090

60

%

31%

71

%En

gine

erin

g To

tal

997

10

0%

1,1

66

100%

1

,315

10

0%

1,3

89

100%

1

,809

10

0%

30%

81

%Nu

rsin

g Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e 1

0%

-

0%

1

0%

1

0%

1

0%

0%

0%

As

ian

1

9

4%

20

4%

1

7

3%

17

3%

2

8

5%

65%

47

%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

70

14

%

70

13

%

77

13

%

69

13

%

51

9%

-2

6%

-27%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

2

0

4%

21

4%

3

1

5%

25

5%

2

5

5%

0%

25%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

-

0%

1

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

6

1%

11

2%

1

4

2%

14

3%

7

1%

-5

0%

17%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

1

2

2%

13

2%

1

7

3%

14

3%

1

7

3%

21%

42

%

Unkn

own

1

7

3%

13

2%

7

1%

6

1%

7

1%

17

%

-59%

W

hite

355

71

%

385

72

%

408

71

%

403

73

%

403

75

%

0%

14%

Nurs

ing

Tota

l

500

10

0%

534

10

0%

573

10

0%

549

10

0%

539

10

0%

-2%

8%

Othe

r As

ian

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

1

1%

-

-

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

111

99

%

104

98

%

82

99

%

149

99

%

115

98

%

-23%

4%

Un

know

n

1

1%

2

2%

-

0%

1

1%

-

0%

-100

%

-100

%

Whi

te

-

0%

-

0%

1

1%

1

1%

1

1%

0%

-

Othe

r Tot

al

1

12

100%

1

06

100%

8

3

100%

1

51

100%

1

17

100%

-2

3%

4%Sc

ienc

e Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

12

0%

13

0%

1

0

0%

6

0%

9

0%

50%

-2

5%

Asia

n

80

3%

8

5

3%

92

3%

1

12

4%

128

4%

14

%

60%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

4

65

18%

5

17

18%

5

10

17%

4

82

17%

4

86

17%

1%

5%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

8

9

3%

115

4%

1

32

4%

133

5%

1

55

5%

17%

74

%

Nativ

e Ha

wai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nd

1

0%

5

0%

2

0%

5

0%

7

0%

40%

60

0%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

42

2%

5

3

2%

56

2%

5

0

2%

49

2%

-2

%

17%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

4

8

2%

89

3%

9

4

3%

112

4%

1

10

4%

-2%

12

9%

Unkn

own

1

41

5%

115

4%

8

9

3%

70

2%

6

5

2%

-7%

-5

4%

Whi

te

1

,700

66

%

1,8

84

66%

2

,009

67

%

1,8

74

66%

1

,860

65

%

-1%

9%

Scie

nce

Tota

l

2,5

78

100%

2

,876

10

0%

2,9

94

100%

2

,844

10

0%

2,8

69

100%

1%

11

%

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Tabl

e 3.

22:

CSU

Und

ergr

adua

te F

all E

nrol

lmen

t by

Col

lege

& E

thni

city

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Unde

rgra

duat

e As

ian

1

5

5%

15

6%

1

1

5%

13

8%

8

4%

-3

8%

-47%

Non-

Degr

ee

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

15

5%

2

6

11%

2

6

12%

2

1

12%

2

2

11%

5%

47

%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

10

4%

7

3%

1

0

5%

8

5%

8

4%

0%

-20%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

3

1%

2

1%

4

2%

3

2%

1

4

7%

367%

36

7%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

3

1%

2

1%

4

2%

3

2%

7

3%

133%

13

3%

Unkn

own

4

3

16%

2

2

9%

15

7%

1

3

8%

18

9%

38

%

-58%

W

hite

185

68

%

171

70

%

150

68

%

109

64

%

132

63

%

21%

-2

9%Un

derg

radu

ate

Non-

Degr

ee T

otal

2

74

100%

2

45

100%

2

20

100%

1

70

100%

2

09

100%

23

%

-24%

Unde

rgra

duat

e Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

1

0%

3

0%

1

0%

1

0%

4

0%

300%

30

0%St

udie

s As

ian

3

8

5%

34

4%

4

0

5%

46

5%

5

2

5%

13%

37

%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

190

26

%

227

29

%

242

28

%

236

24

%

236

22

%

0%

24%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

3

4

5%

24

3%

3

1

4%

46

5%

4

9

4%

7%

44%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

-

0%

1

0%

1

0%

-

0%

2

0%

-

-

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

9

1%

7

1%

5

1%

6

1%

5

0%

-17%

-4

4%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

18

2%

2

1

3%

21

2%

2

4

2%

40

4%

67

%

122%

Un

know

n

107

14

%

84

11

%

95

11

%

105

11

%

117

11

%

11%

9%

W

hite

342

46

%

379

49

%

427

49

%

501

52

%

589

54

%

18%

72

%Un

derg

radu

ate

Stud

ies

Tota

l 7

39

100%

7

80

100%

8

63

100%

9

65

100%

1

,094

10

0%

13%

48

%Ur

ban

Affa

irs

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tiv

2 1%

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-100

%

Asia

n 1

0%

2

1%

2

1%

3

1%

2

0%

-3

3%

100%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

11

4

32%

1

04

32%

1

09

34%

1

17

30%

1

26

30%

8%

11

%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

14

4%

11

3%

7

2%

1

8

5%

26

6%

44

%

86%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-1

00%

-

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

5

1%

4

1%

7

2%

8

2%

11

3%

38

%

120%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

1

0%

3

1%

3

1%

8

2%

11

3%

38

%

1000

%

Unkn

own

23

6%

16

5%

1

3

4%

9

2%

4

1%

-56%

-8

3%

Whi

te

200

56

%

186

57

%

183

56

%

223

58

%

242

57

%

9%

21%

Urba

n Af

fairs

Tot

al

360

10

0%

327

10

0%

324

10

0%

387

10

0%

422

10

0%

9%

17%

Gran

d To

tal

1

1,72

2

1

2,03

9

1

2,35

9

1

2,21

8

1

2,44

6

2%

6%

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

23:

CSU

Gra

duat

e &

Law

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by C

olle

ge &

Eth

nici

ty: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Busi

ness

Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

-

0%

3

0%

3

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-100

%

-

Asia

n

67

5%

5

6

4%

60

4%

6

3

5%

52

6%

-1

7%

-22%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

12

4

9%

148

11

%

135

10

%

137

11

%

118

13

%

-14%

-5

%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

28

2%

3

6

3%

34

3%

3

2

3%

29

3%

-9

%

4%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

245

17

%

266

19

%

303

22

%

264

22

%

154

17

%

-42%

-3

7%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

12

1%

8

1%

1

6

1%

17

1%

1

4

2%

-18%

17

%

Unkn

own

7

4

5%

61

4%

3

2

2%

31

3%

2

1

2%

-32%

-7

2%

Whi

te

8

69

61%

8

18

59%

7

77

57%

6

58

55%

5

43

58%

-1

7%

-38%

Busi

ness

Tot

al

1,4

19

100%

1

,396

10

0%

1,3

60

100%

1

,203

10

0%

931

10

0%

-23%

-3

4%CL

ASS

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

-

0%

-

0%

1

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-1

00%

-

As

ian

6

1%

5

1%

8

1%

6

1%

4

1%

-3

3%

-33%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

12

7

21%

1

43

24%

1

62

30%

1

63

30%

1

34

28%

-1

8%

6%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

14

2%

1

8

3%

22

4%

2

3

4%

25

5%

9%

79

%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

17

3%

1

8

3%

16

3%

2

1

4%

25

5%

19

%

47%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

4

1%

8

1%

5

1%

1

3

2%

11

2%

-1

5%

175%

Un

know

n

61

10

%

43

7%

2

4

4%

14

3%

5

1%

-6

4%

-92%

W

hite

374

62

%

361

61

%

311

57

%

296

55

%

277

58

%

-6%

-2

6%CL

ASS

Tota

l

6

03

100%

5

96

100%

5

49

100%

5

37

100%

4

81

100%

-1

0%

-20%

Educ

atio

n Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e 1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

2

0%

1

0%

-5

0%

0%

Asia

n

18

1%

1

4

1%

13

1%

1

5

1%

11

1%

-2

7%

-39%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

35

9

24%

3

19

23%

3

07

23%

3

15

25%

3

13

27%

-1

%

-13%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

4

0

3%

34

2%

3

6

3%

38

3%

3

9

3%

3%

-3%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

1

0%

1

0%

1

0%

2

0%

2

0%

0%

10

0%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

55

4%

5

3

4%

76

6%

8

7

7%

92

8%

6%

67

%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

10

1%

1

3

1%

18

1%

1

8

1%

21

2%

17

%

110%

Un

know

n

153

10

%

106

8%

5

7

4%

45

4%

2

5

2%

-44%

-8

4%

Whi

te

8

47

57%

8

29

61%

8

47

63%

7

27

58%

6

37

56%

-1

2%

-25%

Educ

atio

n To

tal

1,4

84

100%

1

,369

10

0%

1,3

55

100%

1

,249

10

0%

1,1

41

100%

-9

%

-23%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Tabl

e 3.

23:

CSU

Gra

duat

e &

Law

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by C

olle

ge &

Eth

nici

ty: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

Perc

ent C

hang

e

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Engi

neer

ing

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

2

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-100

%

Asia

n

19

4%

1

9

5%

18

4%

1

3

2%

17

2%

31

%

-11%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

14

3%

1

1

3%

16

4%

1

5

3%

13

2%

-1

3%

-7%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

4

1%

8

2%

5

1%

7

1%

3

0%

-5

7%

-25%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

1

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-100

%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

247

54

%

192

48

%

246

54

%

346

62

%

502

70

%

45%

10

3%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

-

0%

-

0%

3

1%

5

1%

4

1%

-20%

-

Un

know

n

30

7%

2

2

5%

19

4%

1

5

3%

12

2%

-2

0%

-60%

W

hite

138

30

%

149

37

%

149

33

%

158

28

%

167

23

%

6%

21%

Engi

neer

ing

Tota

l

455

10

0%

403

10

0%

456

10

0%

559

10

0%

718

10

0%

28%

58

%Gr

adua

te

Asia

n

2

9%

2

11%

4

14

%

1

4%

-

0%

-100

%

-100

%St

udie

s Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

4

17%

2

11

%

2

7%

1

4%

3

13%

20

0%

-25%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

1

4%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-100

%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

-

0%

-

0%

1

4%

1

4%

1

4%

0%

-

Two

or m

ore

race

s

-

0%

1

5%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

- -

Un

know

n

5

22%

1

5%

1

4

50%

1

5

63%

1

7

74%

13

%

240%

W

hite

11

48

%

13

68

%

7

25%

6

25

%

2

9%

-67%

-8

2%Gr

adua

te S

tudi

es T

otal

23

10

0%

19

10

0%

28

10

0%

24

10

0%

23

10

0%

-4%

0%

Law

Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

1

0%

1

0%

3

1%

2

0%

2

0%

0%

100%

As

ian

1

4

2%

12

2%

1

4

3%

8

2%

10

2%

25

%

-29%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

54

10

%

40

8%

4

1

9%

36

8%

4

0

9%

11%

-2

6%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

17

3%

2

0

4%

21

4%

1

6

4%

21

5%

31

%

24%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

6

1%

7

1%

9

2%

9

2%

6

1%

-3

3%

0%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

2

0%

5

1%

8

2%

8

2%

10

2%

25

%

400%

Un

know

n

15

3%

9

2%

1

1

2%

13

3%

1

6

4%

23%

7%

W

hite

454

81

%

407

81

%

362

77

%

350

79

%

323

75

%

-8%

-2

9%La

w T

otal

5

63

100%

5

01

100%

4

69

100%

4

42

100%

4

28

100%

-3

%

-24%

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


Sec

tio

n

3

Tabl

e 3.

23:

CSU

Gra

duat

e &

Law

Fal

l Enr

ollm

ent

by C

olle

ge &

Eth

nici

ty: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

Race

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

E

nrol

lmen

t %

1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Nurs

ing

Asia

n

1

2%

1

2%

1

2%

2

4%

1

2%

-50%

0%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

7

12%

9

16

%

9

16%

1

1

22%

1

2

24%

9%

71

%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

1

2%

2

3%

3

5%

2

4%

1

2%

-50%

0%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

1

2%

1

2%

1

2%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-100

%

Two

or m

ore

race

s

-

0%

1

2%

1

2%

1

2%

-

0%

-100

%

-

Unkn

own

7

12

%

5

9%

3

5%

-

0%

-

0%

- -1

00%

W

hite

42

71

%

39

67

%

37

67

%

35

69

%

36

72

%

3%

-14%

Nurs

ing

Tota

l

59

10

0%

58

10

0%

55

10

0%

51

10

0%

50

10

0%

-2%

-1

5%Sc

ienc

e Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e 1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

2

0%

1

0%

-5

0%

0%

Asia

n

22

3%

2

8

3%

24

3%

2

4

3%

24

3%

0%

9%

Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

51

6%

5

6

7%

46

5%

4

7

6%

56

7%

19

%

10%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

1

3

2%

12

1%

1

1

1%

15

2%

2

4

3%

60%

85

%

Nativ

e Ha

wai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nd

1

0%

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

- -1

00%

No

n Re

side

nt A

lien

1

40

18%

1

39

16%

1

42

17%

1

23

15%

1

07

13%

-1

3%

-24%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

4

1%

6

1%

6

1%

6

1%

8

1%

33

%

100%

Un

know

n

46

6%

3

8

4%

23

3%

1

6

2%

14

2%

-1

3%

-70%

W

hite

512

65

%

571

67

%

595

70

%

610

72

%

586

71

%

-4%

14

%Sc

ienc

e To

tal

7

90

100%

8

51

100%

8

47

100%

8

43

100%

8

20

100%

-3

%

4%Ur

ban

Affa

irs

Amer

ican

Indi

an/A

lask

a Na

tive

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

1

0%

- -

As

ian

2

1%

3

1%

5

2%

4

2%

4

2%

0%

10

0%

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

6

4

19%

5

7

19%

5

4

21%

3

9

18%

5

2

23%

33

%

-19%

Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

8

2%

7

2%

9

4%

1

0

5%

8

3%

-20%

0%

Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er P

acifi

c Is

land

1

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-100

%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n

26

8%

2

7

9%

19

8%

1

6

7%

14

6%

-1

3%

-46%

Tw

o or

mor

e ra

ces

5

2%

4

1%

7

3%

3

1%

3

1%

0%

-4

0%

Unkn

own

2

8

9%

17

6%

6

2%

7

3%

3

1%

-5

7%

-89%

W

hite

195

59

%

178

61

%

152

60

%

140

64

%

146

63

%

4%

-25%

Urba

n Af

fairs

Tot

al

329

10

0%

293

10

0%

252

10

0%

219

10

0%

231

10

0%

5%

-30%

Gran

d To

tal

5

,725

5,4

86

5

,371

5,1

27

4

,823

-6%

-1

6%

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age


Table 3.24: Undergraduate Fall Enrollment by College & Load: 5-Year Trend Undergraduate Full-Time

Percent Change

College 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Business 1,401 1,313 1,340 1,648 1,593 -3% 14%CLASS 2,507 2,454 2,529 2,079 1,924 -7% -23%Education 668 634 646 553 566 2% -15%Engineering 807 930 1,045 1,136 1,472 30% 82%Nursing 435 467 502 458 457 0% 5%Other - - - 1 - - -Science 1,985 2,218 2,332 2,165 2,266 5% 14%Undergraduate Non-Degree 31 24 14 16 24 50% -23%Undergraduate Studies 312 353 383 412 612 49% 96%Urban Affairs 220 197 209 206 221 7% 0%Full-Time Total 8,366 8,590 9,000 8,674 9,135 5% 9%

Undergraduate Part-Time

Percent Change


Business 661 660 601 597 485 -19% -27%CLASS 626 681 613 636 574 -10% -8%Education 299 263 258 250 245 -2% -18%Engineering 190 236 270 253 337 33% 77%Nursing 65 67 71 91 82 -10% 26%Other 112 106 83 150 117 -22% 4%Science 593 658 662 679 603 -11% 2%Undergraduate Non-Degree 243 221 206 154 185 20% -24%Undergraduate Studies 427 427 480 553 482 -13% 13%Urban Affairs 140 130 115 181 201 11% 44%Part-Time Total 3,356 3,449 3,359 3,544 3,311 -7% -1%


Sec

tio

n

3

Table 3.25: Graduate & Law Fall Enrollment by College & Load: 5-Year Trend Graduate & Law Full-Time

Percent Change


Business 438 457 444 400 314 -22% -28%CLASS 250 237 227 267 266 0% 6%Education 278 241 290 241 307 27% 10%Engineering 80 74 78 131 479 266% 499%Graduate Studies - 4 - - - - -Law 391 350 308 288 247 -14% -37%Nursing 5 19 20 12 7 -42% 40%Science 402 436 408 442 595 35% 48%Urban Affairs 74 58 52 37 54 46% -27%Full-Time Total 1,918 1,876 1,827 1,818 2,269 25% 18%

Graduate & Law Part-Time

Percent Change


Business 981 939 916 803 617 -23% -37%CLASS 353 359 322 270 215 -20% -39%Education 1,206 1,128 1,065 1,008 834 -17% -31%Engineering 375 329 378 428 239 -44% -36%Graduate Studies 23 15 28 24 23 -4% 0%Law 172 151 161 154 181 18% 5%Nursing 54 39 35 39 43 10% -20%Science 388 415 439 401 225 -44% -42%Urban Affairs 255 235 200 182 177 -3% -31%Part-Time Total 3,807 3,610 3,544 3,309 2,554 -23% -33%


East and West CentersThe opening of Cleveland State University West Center (Westlake) in August 2003 and East Center (Solon) in August 2004 established a suburban presence for the University’s thriving downtown campus. The mission of the centers is dedicated to serving all students and offering the highest level of customer service. Academic offerings include programs for educators (teachers and administrators), business and public service professionals seeking to complete their university degree, and traditional college-age students and high school students in post-secondary educational option programs. CSU has given high priority to strengthening relationships with local community colleges and supporting the rise of e-Learning. As such, the East Center in Solon closed in August of 2011.

Table 3.26: West Center Student Credit Hours: Fall Semesters

West Center

Undergraduate Graduate/Law Total

College 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Business 243 272 - - - 310 131 - 222 107 553 403 - 222 107CLASS 64 - - - - - - - - - 64 - - - -Education 54 - - - - 224 204 194 157 60 278 204 194 157 60Science 93 112 - - 15 - - - - - 93 112 - - 15Grand Total 454 384 - - 15 534 335 194 379 167 988 719 194 379 182

Table 3.26a: Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends

West Center

Enrollment Percent Change SCH Percent Change

College 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1-Year 5-Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1-Year 5-Year

Summer 179 173 137 13 30 131% -83% 644 540 476 46 101 120% -84%Fall 246 170 42 99 57 -42% -77% 988 719 194 379 182 -52% -82%Spring 280 188 58 175 80 -54% -71% 1,086 694 221 566 234 -59% -78%Grand Total 705 531 237 287 167 -42% -76% 2,718 1,953 891 991 517 -48% -81%

Figure 3.26a: Annual West Center Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends


Sec

tio

n

3

Table 3.27a: Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Lorain County Community College Lorain County Community College


Term 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1-Year 5-Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1-Year 5-Year

Summer 25 9 3 8 10 25% -60% 100 36 12 32 30 -6% -70%Fall 88 65 82 71 65 -8% -26% 401 332 424 336 327 -3% -18%Spring 107 88 84 86 76 -12% -29% 442 487 461 387 357 -8% -19%Grand Total 220 162 169 165 151 -8% -31% 943 855 897 755 714 -5% -24%

Figure 3.27a: Annual Lorain County Community College Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends


Table 3.27b: Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Lakeland Community College

Lakeland Community College



Summer 36 29 61 68 7 -90% -81% 115 91 228 251 21 -92% -82%Fall 75 92 90 77 93 21% 24% 337 447 466 391 374 -4% 11%Spring 88 112 118 98 94 -4% 7% 489 500 673 424 355 -16% -27%Grand Total 199 233 269 243 194 -20% -3% 941 1,038 1,367 1,066 750 -30% -20%

Partnerships with Lakeland Community College and Lorain County Community College The partnerships foster direct collaboration with community colleges to offer degree programs on the community college campus in addition to easy transfer through dual admission and various articulation agreements. All locations have grown in popularity as transfer students recognize the value and convenience of gaining an associate’s degree and a degree from CSU. Liaison with these community colleges has been well planned and highly successful due to a shared passion for educating students.

Figure 3.27b: Annual Lakeland Community College Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends


Sec

tio

n

3

Table 3.27c: Annual Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends at Other Off-Campus Locations

Other Locations*



Summer 163 165 259 163 113 -31% -31% 1,011 1,008 1,400 1,106 443 -60% -56%Fall 596 832 691 307 232 -24% -61% 2,980 4,018 3,557 1,326 982 -26% -67%Spring 609 630 799 320 261 -18% -57% 2,531 2,510 4,215 1,371 1,068 -22% -58%Grand Total 1,368 1,627 1,749 790 606 -23% -56% 6,522 7,536 9,172 3,803 2,493 -34% -62%

Note: Student is counted once even if attending multiple off-campus locations

Figure 3.27c: Annual Other Off-Campus Locations Historical Enrollment and SCH Trend

CSU Top 10 Annual Off-Campus Locations In Greater Cleveland Area by Student Credit Hour

n Cleveland Clinic Foundation n Progressive Insurance n University Hospital

n Lake County Education Service Center n MetroHealth n Headstart

n Solon High School n Defense Finance & Accounting Service n Urban Design Center

n Fairview General Hospital

*Other Off-Campus Locations include all off campus locations except East, West, Lorain and Lakeland.

Sec

tio

n

4

Sponsored Research

4Book of Trends

71Section 4 - Sponsored Programs and Research

Sec

tio

n

4

Fiscal Year Percent Change

Source FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FT 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Awards $22,909,197 $17,093,917 $13,483,748 $12,047,738 $12,900,819 $9,655,599 -25% -58% CSU Expenditures $18,558,947 $16,913,731 $20,617,912 $16,707,432 $22,027,038 $13,456,328 -39% -27% CCF Expenditures $24,422,152 $43,642,969 $44,925,258 $51,124,607 $44,570,226 $43,877,270 -2% 80% CSU & CCF Exp Total $42,981,099 $60,556,700 $65,543,170 $67,832,039 $66,597,264 $57,333,598 -14% 33%

Sponsored Programs and Research at Cleveland State UniversityThe University is committed to enhancing the research environment in support of its faculty and students. As such, efforts are underway to expand the research services currently offered to assist those seeking external funding for research, scholarship, and creative projects. Cleveland State University established a new office, Sponsored Programs & Research Services (SPRS). By merging Grants Accounting of the Controller’s Office and the Office of Sponsored Programs we are now able to serve faculty as a “one-stop-shop” SPRS is headed by the Vice President for Research, who is responsible for raising the research profile at Cleveland State University and for establishing the University as a recognized contributor to the local, regional, national and global research priorities. The creation of this expanding office will enable the University to achieve its mission, in which scholarship and research are held as major tenets.

Bringing discoveries from the laboratory to the classroom and to the world is a long and very expensive undertaking, one that is at the heart of what a university should do and do well. While Cleveland State is a “young” institution, it has committed itself to discovery and to becoming a research-focused university. And, while we are still in the early phases of that steep research incline, CSU has much to show for its initial efforts - efforts that presage a promising future.

It is important to note that the sponsored program proposals and awards that are described by the numbers and charts to follow would not have been possible without the drive, dedication and intellect of the University’s talented and diverse faculty and the contributions of graduate students and postdocs.

Table 4.1: Sponsored Program Awards and Expenditures, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Figure 4.1: Sponsored Program Awards and Expenditures, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Notes:1 The Total Award amount for FY 2010 & forward differs from that listed in the Monthly Activity Reports previously published by SPRS (http://www.csuohio.edu/offices/spr/monthlyactivityreports/index.html) for two reasons: 1) the reports in the Book of Trends include State Appropriations as a separate line-item while the Monthly Activity Reports do not. The amount stated here is higher because not all State Appropriation funding has been allocated to a Sponsored Program account. 2) The Award amount in the Monthly Activity Report for FY 2010 and the Award Amount numbers published in the Book of Trends for previous years were based on the Award amount received during that period for each project. For FY 2010 and forward, the Total Project Award Amount is reported. 2 From FY 2010 forward, CSU is including research expenditures from the Lerner Research Institute (LRI) at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. These expenditures are only for those grants held by LRI faculty who engage with Cleveland State University students.


Table 4.2: Sponsored Program Awards by Source, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Figure 4.2a: Sponsored Program Awards by Source, Fiscal Year 2015

Percent Change

Source FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Federal Grants $15,017,485 $12,187,422 $8,696,479 $6,338,894 $7,083,836 $4,957,413 -30% -67%State Grants $1,212,245 $479,032 $589,860 $1,408,899 $3,283,590 $2,157,929 -34% 78%Local Grants $822,273 $416,185 $253,289 $494,172 $382,518 $128,671 -66% -84%Private Grants $2,245,353 $2,791,295 $3,944,120 $3,805,774 $2,150,875 $2,411,588 12% 7%State Appropriations $3,611,841 $1,219,983 $360,551 $458,182 $822,317 $817,317 -1% -77%

Total $22,909,197 $17,093,917 $13,844,299 $12,505,921 $13,723,136 $10,472,918 -24% -54%

Notes: 1 The Total Award amount for FY 2010 & forward differs from that listed in the Monthly Activity Reports previously published by OSPR (http://www.csuohio.edu/offices/spr/monthlyactivityreports/index.html) for two reasons: 1) the reports in the Book of Trends include State Appropriations as a separate line-item while the Monthly Activity Reports do not. The amount stated here is higher because not all State Appropriation funding has been allocated to a Sponsored Program account. 2) The Award amount in the Monthly Activity Report for FY 2010 and the Award Amount numbers published in the Book of Trends for previous years were based on the Award amount received during that period for each project. For FY 2010 and forward, the Total Project Award Amount is reported.

Figure 4.2b: Program Awards and Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research.Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.


Sec

tio

n

4

Table 4.3: Sponsored Program Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Figure 4.3a: Sponsored Program Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Year 2015

Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research

Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and Research. Appropriation: An authorization granted by the General Assembly to make budgetary expenditures and to incur obligations for specific purposes.Grant: A financial assistance mechanism whereby money and/or direct assistance is provided to carry out approved activities.

Figure 4.3b: Sponsored Program Expenditures by Source, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Percent Change

Source FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FT 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Federal Grants $11,316,469 $8,875,304 $10,128,616 $8,956,841 $7,665,390 $6,904,644 -10% -22%State Grants $3,824,824 $4,837,728 $6,807,950 $4,838,751 $10,593,078 $2,846,101 -73% -41%Local Grants $492,569 $536,053 $514,801 $463,756 $515,601 $297,326 -42% -45%Private Grants $1,979,982 $2,105,142 $2,648,247 $2,227,770 $3,171,219 $3,394,620 7% 61%State Appropriations $945,103 $559,504 $518,299 $220,314 $81,750 $13,638 -83% -98%LRI - CCF Expenditures $24,422,152 $43,642,969 $44,925,258 $51,124,607 $44,570,226 $43,877,270 -2% 1%

Total $42,981,099 $60,556,700 $65,543,171 $67,832,038 $66,597,264 $57,333,599 -14% 33%

Notes: 1 For FY 2010 & forward, CSU is including research expenditures from the Lerner Research Institute (LRI) at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. These expenditures are only for those grants held by LRI faculty who engage with Cleveland State University students.2 The figures below only detail Cleveland State University expenditures.


National Science Foundation Rankings of Cleveland State University and Other Selected SchoolsThe NSF rankings are widely recognized as a valuable benchmark in comparing the level of research taking place at institutions across the country. The first table (4.4) below compares Cleveland State with other Northern Ohio institutions, while Table 4.5a shows other institutions ranked similarly to Cleveland State. In addition to seeking and receiving funding for research and development, the University places a heavy emphasis on graduate education and involving those students in the research laboratory.

2014 (Dollars in Thousands)

Institution Ranking 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

University of Akron 162 $34,507 $52,884 $65,536 $66,413 $69,640 $69,528

University of Toledo 175 $66,136 $70,399 $74,149 $68,228 $69,072 $61,900

Cleveland State University 176 $13,424 $34,235 $55,502 $61,111 $67,378 $61,783

Kent State University 238 $25,050 $26,331 $27,455 $26,507 $23,149 $25,666

Bowling Green State University 328 $8,396 $8,124 $8,999 $8,566 $13,157 $8,861

Youngstown State University 432 $2,081 $4,523 $4,732 $3,598 $3,785 $3,464

Source: Data retrieved from the National Science Foundation website on June 30, 2016 at the following link: https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/herd/2014/html/HERD2014_DST_17.html

Table 4.4: National Science Foundation Ranking of Research and Development Expenditures,Fiscal Years 2009-2014


Sec

tio

n

4

Indirect Cost RecoveryIndirect cost recovery is defined as the agreed upon revenue received from a sponsoring agency to pay a grant or contract’s share to reimburse the university for the indirect costs it incurs. Indirect costs are real costs. Indirect cost calculations are based upon such items as space, utilities, security, maintenance, custodial, payroll, purchasing, accounting, personnel and many other expenses associated with project administration and implementation. A portion of indirect costs recovered at Cleveland State University (CSU) become part of the general fund budget for the entire university.

40% of all indirect costs returned on sponsored programs remain in the university’s general fund. This money is set aside for covering administrative expenses for sponsored program administration. It is also used to cover costs of facilities, depreciation on buildings and equipment, operation and maintenance of facilities, and library expenses. The other half of the indirect costs recovered are distributed as follows: 10% to project director, 10% to project director’s department, 10% to relevant dean’s office, and 30% to the Vice President for Research & Graduate Studies.

Table 4.5: Indirect Cost (IDC) Recovery and Total Sponsored Program Expenditures by Year, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Percent Change

Research Activities FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Direct Sponsored Program Expenditures $17,027,376 $15,351,047 $18,844,807 $15,197,977 $20,518,525 $11,913,435 -42% -30%

Indirect Cost Recovered $1,531,571 $1,562,684 $1,773,105 $1,509,455 $1,508,513 $1,542,893 2% 1%

Total Sponsored Program Expenditures $18,558,947 $16,913,731 $20,617,912 $16,707,432 $22,027,038 $13,456,328 -39% -27%

% IDC of Direct Research Expenditures* 9% 10% 9% 10% 7% 13%

Notes: 1 The % IDC is calculated by dividing the actual indirect cost recovered by the actual direct expenditures for each year.


2012 2013 2014

Institution Ranking Institution Ranking Institution Ranking

University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 180 University of North Dakota 171 Georgia Regents University 173

Wichita State University 181 University of Tennessee, 172 American University 174 The Agricultural Institute

Texas Tech University Health 182 University of California, 173 University of Toledo 175Sciences Center, Lubbock Office of the President

Cleveland State University 183 Cleveland State University 174 Cleveland State University 176

University of Massachusetts, Lowell 184 University of Wyoming 175 University of Massachusetts, Boston 177

University of Massachusetts, Boston 185 Georgia Regents University 176 Ohio University 178

University of Southern Mississippi 186 South Dakota State University 177 University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 179

Table 4.5a: National Science Foundation Ranking of Research Results, Fiscal Years 2012-2014

Source: Data retrieved from the National Science Foundation website on June 30, 2016 at the following link:

https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site?method=rankingBySource&ds=herd


Proposal Submission and Success Rates for Externally Funded ProgramsThe three sections of Table 4.6 below show the Success Rates for Awards broken down by sponsor type.

Table 4.6: Proposals Submitted and Awards Received by Source, Fiscal Years 2009-2015

Source Proposals Submitted FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015Government Sources Federal 153 128 141 128 107 120 145 State 38 25 20 21 21 25 34 Local 15 24 13 14 9 16 12Total Government Sources 206 177 174 163 137 161 191Non-Government Sources Corporate Contracts 11 8 10 13 7 9 12 Foundation and Non-Profit 93 71 58 81 62 73 79Total Non-Government Sources 104 79 68 94 69 82 91Sponsored Programs Total 310 256 242 257 206 243 282

Source Awards Received FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015Government Sources Federal 86 57 45 48 49 29 35 State 27 25 19 20 14 24 12 Local 18 17 14 11 8 13 10Total Government Sources 131 99 78 79 71 66 57Non-Government Sources Corporate Contracts 8 5 5 8 10 4 3 Foundation and Non-Profit 63 55 48 62 51 37 64Total Non-Government Sources 71 60 53 70 61 41 67Sponsored Programs Total 202 159 131 149 132 107 124

Source Success Rate* FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015Government Sources Federal 72% 37% 35% 34% 38% 27% 29% State 79% 66% 76% 100% 67% 114% 48% Local 78% 113% 58% 85% 57% 144% 63%Total Government Sources 74% 48% 44% 45% 44% 48% 35%Non-Government Sources Corporate Contracts 73% 45% 63% 80% 77% 57% 33% Foundation and Non-Profit 60% 59% 68% 107% 63% 60% 88%Total Non-Government Sources 61% 58% 67% 103% 65% 59% 82%Sponsored Programs Total 69% 51% 51% 62% 51% 52% 51%


* * The success rate for each year is calculated by dividing the Awards Received for that year by the Proposals Submitted during the immediately preceding year. Although it is reasonable to assume that most

Awards are based on Proposals submitted during the immediately preceding year, this can create instances where the Success Rate exceeds 100%. This is because some of those years’ awards are based on

Proposals submitted during both the prior and current year.


Sec

tio

n

4

Table 4.7: Proposals Submitted and Awards Received by College or Division, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Table 4.7a: Fiscal Year 2015 Proposals Submitted by College

Fiscal Year

Proposals and Grant Awards FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Proposals Submitted 256 242 257 206 243 282Awards Received 159 131 149 132 107 124Success Rate 51% 51% 62% 51% 52% 51%

Source: CSU Office of Sponsored Programs and ResearchNote: The Success Rate for each year is calculated by dividing the Awards Received for that year by the Proposals Submitted during the immediately preceding year.

College or Division Direct Indirect Total Count

College of Business Administration $202,000 $0 $202,000 2College of Education & Human Services $4,279,588 $945,921 $5,225,509 19College of Engineering $18,754,955 $5,413,761 $24,168,716 61College of Law $0 $0 $0 0College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences $664,522 $168,008 $832,530 15School of Nursing $1,174,617 $121,449 $1,296,066 10College of Sciences & Health Professions $22,872,254 $8,902,700 $31,774,954 88College of Urban Affairs $3,386,803 $769,683 $4,156,486 69Central Administration $11,573,668 $1,713,648 $13,287,316 18Continuing Education $0 $0 $0 0Undergraduate Studies $0 $0 $0 0Fiscal Year 2015 Totals $62,908,407 $18,035,170 $80,943,577 282


College or Division Direct Indirect Total Count

College of Business Administration $138,500 $0 $138,500 1College of Education & Human Services $277,736 $20,583 $298,319 9College of Engineering $2,591,262 $690,921 $3,282,183 17College of Law $0 $0 $0 0College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences $265,162 $21,782 $286,944 12School of Nursing $522,710 $53,003 $575,713 6College of Sciences & Health Professions $1,498,192 $475,223 $1,973,415 17College of Urban Affairs $1,200,819 $183,213 $1,384,032 49Central Administration $1,660,605 $55,888 $1,716,493 13Continuing Education $0 $0 $0 0Undergraduate Studies $0 $0 $0 0Fiscal Year 2015 Totals $8,154,986 $1,500,613 $9,655,599 124

Table 4.7b: Fiscal Year 2015 Awards Received by College

Figure 4.7: Proposal Submissions and Grant Awards, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Notes: The amounts above do not include State Appropriations. Due to the manner in which the State Appropriation line-item is included in Table 4.2, it is not possible

to determine which College or Division received those funds.


Sec

tio

n

4

Intellectual PropertyContemporary universities committed to teaching, research, service, and dissemination of knowledge increasingly find themselves in a position of having created knowledge or materials with commercial value through patents, copyrights, and/or trademarks. Creation of such knowledge or materials, also referred to as intellectual property, is a much coveted outcome of any vibrant research program. Activities that result in the creation of intellectual property raise the reputation of the university and involved researchers. They also create rich educational opportunities for students participating in such programs. Universities may gain significant revenue through commercialized intellectual property.

FISCAL YEAR Percent Change

Source FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Disclosures 6 7 3 5 10 3 -70% -50%

Non-Provisional Patent Apps. Filed 4 3 6 4 3 2 -33% -50%

Provisional Patent Applications Filed 6 3 1 2 7 3 -57% -50%

Licenses Approved - - 1 - 1 3 200% -

Source: Technology Transfer Office

5 Year Percent Change is from the period 2010 to 2015.

Notes: The following definitions are from the US Patent and Trademark Office (www.uspto.gov)

Disclosure: Description of an invention in a patent or patent application.

Patent: Granting of a property right to the inventor, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Licenses approved: The patent law provides for the transfer or sale of a patent, or of an application for a patent, by an instrument in writing. Such an instrument is referred to as an assignment of license.

Table 4.8: Intellectual Property: Patents and Disclosures, Fiscal Years 2010-2015

Percent Change

Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Business $9,988 $1,375 $0 $5,768 $17,278 $16,529 -4% 65%

Education $57,217 $137,717 $174,568 $126,740 $44,969 $88,092 96% 54%

Engineering $274,368 $270,646 $175,893 $209,268 $334,208 $256,582 -23% -6%

Liberal Arts/Social Science $7,907 $0 $6,300 $1,600 $1,600 $6,026 277% -24%

Science $469,847 $472,280 $293,496 $456,115 $365,324 $266,440 -27% -43%

Nursing $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,920 - -

Urban Affairs $49,586 $77,475 $48,786 $115,308 $120,842 $51,830 -57% 5%

Total $868,913 $959,493 $699,043 $914,799 $884,221 $699,419 -21% -20%

Source: CSU Controller’s Office

Table 4.9: Cleveland State University Graduate Student Support from Externally Funded Research, Fiscal Years 2010-2015


Growth in Graduate EducationGraduate education at Cleveland State has seen unprecedented growth in recent years, from 3,000 students in the 1980’s, to 4,000 in the 1990’s, to approximately 5,000 students pursuing graduate and post-graduate programs at the University. Such growth in graduate programs has implications for strengthening the quality of these offerings and seizing opportunities for supporting educational goals of students by creating new and tailored program offerings. Growth in graduate programs at CSU points to numerous research opportunities for future students and faculty researchers. Institutional investments in graduate education are closely linked with strategies for promoting sponsored research, which lead to an increased opportunity for the contributions of graduate, doctoral and post-doctoral students.

Institution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Grad SCH

University of Akron 10% 10% 11% 11% 10% 28,885Bowling Green State University 8% 8% 8% 8% 9% 19,573University of Cincinnati 21% 20% 20% 20% 20% 83,439Cleveland State University 20% 19% 18% 18% 17% 33,632Central State University 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 48Kent State University 13% 13% 13% 13% 14% 51,609Miami University 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 15,291Ohio State University 14% 13% 12% 13% 12% 93,784Ohio University 12% 11% 12% 13% 12% 43,507Shawnee State University 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1,658University of Toledo 10% 11% 11% 11% 10% 25,021Wright State University 12% 12% 13% 14% 14% 26,898Youngstown State University 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 9,048

Total 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 432,393

Note: Graduate students include the following ranks: DS (Doctoral), MS (Master’s), ND, NM and NG (non degree-seeking graduate students).Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Course Enrollment (CN) query. Run Date: October 3, 2016.

Table 4.10: Percentage of Total Student Credit Hours Taken by Graduate Level Students at Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions-Main Campuses Only, Fall Terms 2011-2015

Highlights

n Table 4.10 From 2011 to 2015, Cleveland State University has consistently been near the top in the percentage of total student credit hours taken by graduate students among Ohio’s 4-year institutions.


Sec

tio

n

4

Table 4.11: Selected Research & Grant Highlights by College

College Department Project Description

Business

Education and Human Services

Centers for Outreach and Engagement

Counseling, Administration and Adult Learning

Curriculum and Foundations

Small Business Development Center (SBDC):The College received $75,000 from the State of Ohio to run the Small Business Development Center. The Cleveland State University (CSU) SBDC is funded by the Ohio Department of Development and the Small Business Administration (SBA). The CSU SBDC serves Cuyahoga County and provides high quality business and economic development assistance to small businesses and nascent entrepreneurs in order to promote growth, expansion, innovation, increased productivity and management improvement.

MOCA Fellowship Collaboration:The Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland (MOCA) and the Cleveland State University Monte Ahuja College of Business are partnering to connect the classroom to the workplace through experiential learning. CSU and MOCA work together annually to select four outstanding individuals who will spend 12 months at MOCA Cleveland serving as part-time, junior staff members in the MOCA-CSU Fellowship Program. The Program grant is for $400,000 from July 2015 through July 2017.

Civic Engagement Grant: The Civic Engagement Grant provides $2,500 to support the SBDC with the development of curriculum and materials to support self-paced learning as well as group workshops and training of entrepreneurs. The SBDC addresses the need of economic development and job creation within the Cleveland area. In 2015, 49 jobs were created, 20 new businesses started, and total capital formation (loans and owner investment) of $1,389,145 was acquired by local entrepreneurs. We serve the community by offering free advising and workshops that educate anyone interested in business topics that help entrepreneurs to start businesses as well as continue to grow their businesses. With our new materials, workshops and self-paced learning stations, our entrepreneurs will have access to the newest up to date materials and curriculum to help assist them in their business ventures.

Export Assistance Center (EAN):The College received $130,000 from the State of Ohio to run the Export Assistance Center (EAN) for Regions 8 and 9. International trade specialists provide export assistance and focus new-to-export businesses and exporters in expanding overseas markets. They promote business development and support future competitiveness through international market opportunities, increased small business export transactions and export sales.

Center for Educational Leadership: Evolved from the nationally recognized First Ring Leadership Academy, the Center for Educational Leadership partners with urban school districts to offer professional development for principals and academic programs to develop and sustain inspired leaders for today’s schools. Most notably is the Inspired Leaders Principal Licensure Program, which is launching its fifth cohort. Also offered are the Master of Education in Organizational Leadership, the Empowered Leaders Teacher Endorsement Program and the Education Policy Fellowship Program. The Center also coordinates the First Ring Leadership Academy that is funded by a grant from the Martha Holden Jennings Foundation. This is a year-long training program promoting transformational leadership in the teachers and administrators working in the Cleveland Municipal School District and the thirteen inner ring school districts bordering Cleveland.

Career Passport Program currently called Making My Future Work: A three-year $1,000,000 USDE Institute of Education Sciences grant. It continues to develop, refine, implement and evaluate a college and career readiness program for use in urban secondary schools as an intervention to prevent school dropouts. A state-of-the art, user-friendly curriculum manual consisting of 100 lessons and four modules has been created by key personnel, public high school teachers, graduate assistants and a graphics design consultant. A training and orientation video to accompany the manual is being developed in collaboration with the Center for Educational Technology.

Gifted Education Enters Cyberspace: The graduate program in Gifted Education is offering all six required courses online, extending outreach to meet teachers’ needs in serving gifted, talented, and advanced learners in schools across the country. This is the only program in the state to receive National Recognition from the National Association of Gifted Children.

The Center for Urban Education Carries out part of its mission by assisting faculty at CSU and external partners in P-20 education with the identification, development and/or submission of grant proposals including the execution and management of grants at post-award. The Center is currently involved in 18 projects. During the 2015-16 academic year, the Center was awarded a research grant from the Spencer Foundation, led by Center Director Adam Voight, for a project that investigates how young people analyze and understand social issues that affect their lives. This academic year, the Center also led the evaluation of the “Project PASS” reading tutoring program in Youngstown City Schools, supported by the Ohio Department of Education. With support from the CSU Office of Research, the Center also conducted a research study of a district-wide student voice initiative in the Cleveland Metropolitan School District (CMSD) during the 2015-16


school year to understand the effects of the initiative on participating students and schools. In spring 2016, the Center partnered with CMSD to create a research policy fellowship for a CSU doctoral student in the Research and Evaluation Department at the district that will be renewed in the upcoming year.

Master of Urban Secondary Teaching Residency Program – This graduate-level licensure program offers a yearlong residency in an urban secondary school to fully prepare teachers for successful classroom teaching. The MUST Residency Program partners with the Cleveland Metropolitan School District and the Euclid School District to develop teachers who are committed to social justice and the success of students in urban schools.

The Cleveland Schools Book Fund: This program is designed to supply all Pre-K through Grade 3 classrooms in the Cleveland Municipal School District with libraries of children’s literature as well as provide teachers professional development to increase young students’ interest in and ability to read, comprehend and enjoy.

The Stocker Foundation grant - Lorain Reads: The grant provides home library building activities through an interactive web-site for all children in Lorain City Schools in grades Pre-K through 3.

Martha Holden Jennings Foundation grant: “Building a Better On-Ramp for Advanced High School Mathematics” provides over 50 teachers and principals from the Innovative Network of Cleveland Metropolitan School District with professional learning activities in a year-round blended program.

United Way/CEIE Community Wrap-Around School (Walton) grant provides support for the community wrap-around model at Walton School. The grant provides support for CSU involvement in coordinating partner services and engages CSU students in a range of service and outreach activities. In addition, the grant provides support in identifying school needs and locating service providers as potential partners.

CMSD/CEIE Tutor Partnership provides CSU students the opportunity to serve as tutors – and CMSD early elementary classrooms the opportunity to have additional supports for early literacy. Hundreds of hours of tutoring has been provided to CMSD through CSU students while CMSD has provided the CSU students with an opportunity for student employment.

Children’s Museum of Cleveland/CEIE partnership funded through the State of Ohio provides the Children’s Museum of Cleveland with CSU interns to support programming, development and marketing.

Project Reach: A major five-year grant to improve Cleveland State University’s ability to prepare all teachers to provide effective instruction for Limited English Proficient students, professional development for content area teachers to improve academic achievement of Limited English Proficient students, and to become a region that provides strong support in both language acquisition and content learning for all classrooms that serve Limited English Proficient students.

Highly Qualified Teachers Program: A five-year U.S. Department of Education grant to enhance the Special Education Programs. The emphasis is on graduating candidates who meet the highly qualified teacher guidelines under the No Child Left Behind and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act legislation.

CSUTeach: With the support of the NSF Noyce Scholars Program and Cleveland State’s partners (National Math and Science Initiative, UTeach Institute, Ohio STEM Learning Network, and the Cleveland Metropolitan School District) Cleveland State is bringing the UTeach model to Ohio transforming the teacher education experience for pre-service teachers to be licensed to teach grades 7-12, with an emphasis on preparing for underserved, urban classrooms. The program provides project-based instruction and inquiry design in mathematics and science classrooms. Students participate in internships with local schools and non-profit organizations. Scholarship funds are available to eligible STEM students. Noyce Scholars will be eligible to become licensed STEM teachers.

Choose Ohio First: This scholarship program which provides renewable scholarships of up to $4,700 per year is designed to attract and graduate qualified STEMM Education students. Scholarship recipients are required to tutor in an academic environment to support classroom education. As part of the Ohio Innovation Partnership and funded through the Ohio Board of Regents, the scholarships are designed to significantly strengthen Ohio’s competitiveness in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM) and STEM education.

The Masters of Urban Secondary Teaching (MUST) STEM Fellows Program: The program awards full tuition scholarships to eligible students pursuing licensure in math or science and will also fund up to 8 hours of undergraduate credit for students who need to complete pre or co-requisites for the MUST program.


Center for Excellence and Innovation in Education (CEIE)

Teacher Education


Sec

tio

n

4


Careers in Health and Medical Professions (CHAMPS): An ongoing year-round program developed to recruit minorities into high skill level health care careers by increasing awareness and knowledge. The program provides two or more years of intensive academic enrichment by engaging high school students in skill enhancement, in-depth medical career experiences and thought-provoking science activities while helping them develop into a unified, cohesive cohort. The program is funded by the Martha Holden Jennings Foundation.

The Campus International School (CIS): Conceived as a professional development school with the Cleveland Metropolitan School District (CMSD), Campus International School is a public school currently offering instruction in Kindergarten through 5th grade to an economically and socially diverse population of students. The aim of the school is to develop well-rounded, knowledgeable, internationally minded students who recognize their common humanity and shared guardianship of the planet. In all areas of the school, the teachers and staff model the learners’ profiles to help teachers and students establish goals, plan units of inquiry, and assess performance. CIS teachers collaborate within and across grade levels to ensure that each student’s instructional needs are met. Professional development is institutionalized with two hours of professional development each week with varied topics based on need. Cleveland State provides a Professor-in-Residence to the school staff and serves as an intermediary between the school and university. Interactions with the university include student field experiences, speech, hearing, psychology and occupational therapy assessments, regular after-school physical science experiences, daily Mandarin language and cultural instruction, facilities for physical education classes, administrative support and grant funding to support school instruction.

Differentiating Instruction at the Campus International School: Supported by the Martha Holden Jennings Foundation the project was developed by an observation that some of the CIS teachers were tracking students by dividing them into static ability groups rather than differentiating instruction by developing multilevel activities that provide opportunities for all children to participate and achieve. The CSU project team introduced and/or extended their knowledge of and ability to implement specific ways to differentiate instruction. The project consisted of numerous phases during the school year and included two levels of evaluation: a formative evaluation and an external evaluation. The resulting summary and recommendations were ways Differentiated Instruction can be sustained at the Campus International School and transferred to other CMSD schools. The teachers assessed their students’ learning and the faculty members and external evaluator assessed teacher learning.

The Community Learning Center: Formerly the Educational Services Center, the Community Learning Center for Children and Youth (CLC) provides an engaged-learning experience for students at Cleveland State while serving the community by offering free assessment and tutoring programs for children at the elementary and middle-school grade levels who have difficulties with reading, math, or learning in general. The children’s positive learning experiences with the CLC have been recognized both by their families at home and their teachers at school. Under the supervision of the Department of Teacher Education, the CLC has grown from supporting two classes serving thirty children from the community to nine serving 180 children from the community. Continuously expanding, the CLC now offers a program for children learning English as a second or foreign language for university students pursuing a degree or endorsement in TESOL (Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages).As an integral part of the teacher-education program, the CLC allows for both undergraduate and graduate students to engage in real-life experiences assessing and teaching children from diverse backgrounds. Through interactions with the children at the CLC, faculty provides supervised opportunities in their courses for university students pursuing licenses and/or degrees in education to explore the links between research, theory, and practice. Additionally, the CLC hosts a range of educational resources, including assessment and curriculum materials and assistive technology devices, for faculty to demonstrate in classes and for students to examine and use.

MOCA Fellowship Collaboration: The Museum of Contemporary Art Cleveland (MOCA) and the Cleveland State University College of Education, Department of Teacher Education are partnering to connect the classroom to the workplace through experiential learning. Early Childhood Education program has been identified to be a part of a fellowship program that partners with the Museum of Contemporary Art. The fellowship is classified as an internship and MOCA Cleveland will fund this part time position for ECE teacher candidates in the amount of $15,600.00. The internships are for 12 months and begin September 2016.

Multicultural Learning and Teaching International Journal: Multicultural Learning and Teaching, a De Gruyter publication, is now housed in CoEHS, Department of Teacher Education. Multicultural Learning and Teaching (MLT) is a multidisciplinary international journal that explores the education of people from diverse multicultural backgrounds in a variety of learning environments, inside and outside the classroom. The journal focuses on the broad implications of multicultural learning and teaching practices around the world, going beyond traditional education journals to offer analysis and practical recommendations of interest to teachers, counseling and community-service providers, school administrators, urban program specialists,


Engineering


education policymakers, and any professionals who grapple with questions of multicultural communication. The journal will provide national and international recognition, and will support efforts to build a distinctive image for CSU, CoEHS and the Department of Teacher Education. The journal publishes two issues a year.

The STEMM Education Center at Cleveland State University includes faculty members from the Colleges of Education and Human Services, Science and Health Professions and the Washkewicz College of Engineering. The STEMM Education Center provides a mechanism for connecting the STEMM education efforts across campus, not as a gatekeeper, but as a place to connect and collaborate across the colleges, disciplines, and with K-12 and other outside STEMM entities. In recent years the faculty associated with the center have received over $10 million in external grant funds with collaboration of over 20 faculty members from across the colleges. MC2STEM High School is also a major partner in the center. MC2STEM High School was created in 2008 as the platform school for northeast Ohio. In addition to the on campus agenda, the STEMM Education Center also houses the Center for Innovation in STEM Education (CISE) and the northeast Ohio hub of the Ohio STEM Learning Network (OSLN). CISE provides professional development around project-based instruction and fabrication laboratories to K-12 administrators and teachers, providing support for state STEM initiatives and STEM schools across the state of Ohio and also has connections to the national STEMx Network.

Workplace Health Programs: Working in collaboration with CSU’s VikeHealth program, Departmental faculty in Health and Exercise Physiology oversee the Fitness for Life employee fitness program and offer a multitude of health promotion and fitness programs for the Journey to Wellness program for CSU employees.

Human Performance Laboratory: The Human Performance Laboratory is a state of the art facility designed for teaching and research. Currently the laboratory is working on several projects with Orbital Research Inc., including a pilot physiological assessment system aimed to monitor hypoxia (lack of oxygen) in the Air Force’s F-22 Raptor pilots. The lab is equipped to simulate flight physiology of pilots up to 25,000 feet altitude and is testing Orbital’s sensors to predict hypoxia before the pilots become impaired and unable to fly. Another Orbital Research project is the development and testing of a microsystem to sense and control warfighter physiology, in particular Special Forces in extreme military dive operations. During this research, the lab will test sensors developed by Orbital that can monitor and deliver proper breathing gas mixtures during rapid descent from altitude. Currently several graduate students are conducting research involving devices to enhance recovery in athletes, prevent hyperthermia, and to correlate power with speed and agility. The lab will be expanding into new areas for subcellular research.

Additive Manufacturing Instructional and Training Laboratory at Cleveland State University:This project, funded by the State of Ohio, will lead to the establishment of a laboratory for additive manufacturing (3D printing) in the Washkewicz College of Engineering. The aim is to train employees from regional industry and to educate students to develop a workforce in the field of additive manufacturing and contribute to the economic development of the region and State.

CPS-Synergy: Cyber-enabled repetitive motions in rehabilitation: Researchers from Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, and Health and Human Performance (College of Education and Human Services) are collaborating in a National Science Foundation project on advanced machines for exercise and rehabilitation. The machines measure and process biomechanical variables and generate adjustments to their own resistance, providing users with cues that will ultimately maximize training or rehabilitation effectiveness and guarantee safety. The machines will be reconfigurable by software, permitting a wide range of exercises with the same hardware.

Optimal Prosthesis Design with Energy Regeneration: This collaborative project between Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, and Mechanical Engineering, funded by the NSF, includes human motion, control, optimization, estimation, robotics, and mechatronics. Its objective is to develop innovative prosthetic legs which enable natural gait with low power consumption.

Microstructural Analysis of MICAST2-12: Al-7wt% Si Alloy Directionally Solidified on the International Space Station: The purpose of this project is to characterize the dendritic microstructure of Al-7wt% Si samples directionally solidified on the International Space Station in the low gravity environment of space. Primary dendrite spacing and primary dendrite trunk diameters are being measured for steady-state and transient growth conditions. Comparison of terrestrially and space processed sample microstructures will help us understand the role of convection in the formation of defects during casting of metallic alloys.

Mechanistic Study of Developmental Neurotoxicity on 3D Cultured Stem Cell Microarrays: There is a critical need for improved human toxicology testing to rapidly advance therapeutic drug candidates to preclinical evaluation or to prioritize potential environmental toxicants. The ability to predict developmental neurotoxicity in vivo is of particular importance in identifying drug candidates and environmental toxicants that should be flagged as potentially harmful to the developing brain. The primary objective of this NIH-funded research project is to investigate the mechanisms of neurotoxicity on human neural stem cells

STEMM Center

Health and Human Performance

College-Wide andInterdepartmental

Chemical and Biomedical Engineering


Sec

tio

n

4


(NSCs) cultured in three dimension (3D) on a high-throughput microarray chip platform. The outcomes from this work could help in precisely measuring various cellular and molecular pathways involved in human developmental toxicology.

Directional Solidification Experiments on The International Space Station-MICAST12: The purpose of this project is to study the role of convection on microstructure development during directional solidification of metallic alloys. Al-7% dendritic monocrystal samples grown at Cleveland State University are being compared with those processed under similar conditions on the International Space Station in a convection-free environment. This is a joint NASA-ESA research project between Cleveland State University and the University of Arizona. The third sample processed on the Space Station (MICAST2-12) has just been received and will be characterized under this project.

Effect of Varying Convection on Dendrite Morphology and Macrosegregation: This NASA project aims to: (a) study directional solidification of Al-Cu alloys that are compatible with the Space Station facilities; (b) conduct experiments involving solidification through cross-section decrease and through cross-section increase; and (c) examine array morphology changes and macrosegregation associated with DS through cross-section changes.

Acquisition of an Integrated Atomic Force Microscope/Inverted Optical Microscope for Interdisciplinary Research at Cleveland State University: CSU researchers were awarded a Major Research Instrumentation grant from the NSF to acquire an integrated atomic force microscope. This equipment will enable sub-molecular high-resolution imaging, low-noise precision force spectroscopy measurements, and epi-fluorescence imaging capabilities. Students and faculty whose research and teaching include materials science (biomedical, electronics, energy applications), biosensors, thermo-responsive polymers, nano-scale systems, biomechanics, and soft materials, will immensely benefit from this equipment.

Next Generation Oxygen Concentrators: This project, funded by the Invacare Corporation, aims at improving oxygen concentrators for persons who need oxygen therapy. The heart of these devices is a “molecular sieve bed” which concentrates oxygen from ambient air at 21% to about 98%. CSU’s research expertise in gas separation and storage by adsorption and in modeling chemical processes will perfect the next generation portable oxygen concentrators with higher efficiency.

Evaluation of Safety Practices for Short Duration Work Zones: This research project is a collaboration with the Texas A&M Transportation Institute for the Ohio Department of Transportation. It involves observing maintenance crews in Columbus and Cleveland to evaluate the use of new strategies and technologies to improve the safety of work zone operations. During Phase I, several key pieces of equipment were identified for further analysis. Phase II includes the field evaluation of a mobile barrier, a worker basket for the setup and removal of temporary traffic control, and equipment mounted lighting. It is expected that the use of this equipment will add to the continued safe and efficient flow of traffic in short duration work zones.

Clinical Trial Systems Project: This project utilizes systems thinking and design principles to identify and map the current clinical trial process, identify breakdowns in the process, and develop strategies to address those breakdowns. By taking a broad view of the system, the goal is to identify areas that have not been addressed which will have a major impact on the system as a whole. The project uses the tools on which engineers and architects are trained to visualize the current system, a potential future state and pathways to get there. A critical component of this strategy is that instead of using the traditional hypothesis-testing approach, the current state is modeled and is worked back to identify critical breakdowns, subsequently moving forward to address those breakdowns.

STAND Social Norming Survey: The Partnership for a Healthy North Royalton, a drug and alcohol prevention group, conducted a Social Norming survey among 9th-12th grade students in North Royalton High School in collaboration with STAND (Students Together Against Negative Decisions). The survey data was recently sent to Cleveland State University, was transcribed into electronic format, and is currently being analyzed for trends and insights.

A Practical Approach for Remediation Performance Assessment and Optimization at DNAPL Sites for Early Identification and Correction of Problems Considering Uncertainty: The goal of this project, funded by USDOD, is to develop and test a methodology to periodically assess and optimize remediation systems and monitoring of USDOD’s dense non-aqueous phase liquid contaminated sites with remedies in place. Methods will be developed and tested to periodically estimate the value of additional characterization data in terms of life cycle cost savings; to refine model calibration taking into account new data from monitoring; to assess the probability of the current operations to meet cleanup objectives; and to re-optimize system operation and monitoring variables to minimize expected life cycle cost taking into consideration performance and cost uncertainty.

Civil and Environmental Engineering


Evaluation of Traffic Flow Analysis and Road User Tools Applied to Work Zones: When a construction or maintenance project on an ODOT interstate or freeway violates the Permitted Lane Closure Schedule, a queue analysis must be completed. The objective of this ODOT project is to establish a reliable, user-friendly procedure for analyzing work zone queuing and calculating road user costs that is reflective of current traffic conditions and technologies.

Development, Field Testing and Implementation of Improved Bridge Parapet Designs: CSU researchers developed a number of methods to reduce or prevent cracking of bridge parapets under a previous research project. In this follow-on USDOT project, these concepts are being tested in the field, primarily with newly constructed bridges along Interstate 90 east of Cleveland. The field observations and testing will document performance of the improved bridge parapet designs.

Evaluation of High Performance Pavement and Bridge Deck Wearing Surface Repair Materials: In order to improve repairs of concrete bridge decks and concrete and asphalt pavements, different repair materials are being installed and analyzed along field test sections near Xenia, Ohio. Approximately 100 repair patches with six different repair materials were installed in March and June 2014. The performance of the patching materials will be monitored over two winters to determine which are suitable for adoption by ODOT.

A Spiral Computer Engineering Lab Framework: This project is establishing a “spiral” laboratory framework for a computer engineering curriculum in which the key concepts are revisited at increasing levels of sophistication and interconnection. Instead of treating each course as an isolated topic, the project is developing a sequence of laboratory experiments and projects weaving through the entire curriculum, from freshman engineering to senior capstone design. This approach will help students see the “big picture” of the discipline and enhance their “integration skills” to address complex and realistic problems.

Usable, Memorable, and Secure Mobile Authentication: As mobile devices such as smartphones are becoming increasingly popular, so has the realization that security is an important requirement for the use of mobile devices in our daily life. Authentication, the first defense mechanism preventing unauthorized access to a mobile device, allows owners of mobile devices to unlock and use their devices. This project investigates approaches for mobile authentication. The approaches are applicable to a wide range of electronic platforms, including smartphones, computers, ATMs, and other high-risk electronic gateways. Consequently, the potential to benefit society with more secure systems should have an enormous impact.

Characterization of Grander Water System: In this project, field effect enzymatic detection (FEED) is used to characterize the bacterial growth in water treated using Grander Water Revitalization Devices. It has been found that the devices have an instantaneous suppressive effect on the growth of the organism. With low concentration samples, the suppressive effect tends to last beyond the 24-hour period. This observation may imply that the Grander devices are capable of reducing bacteria concentration below the infectious dose of typical pathogenic bacteria (<100 CFU/mL) given a longer operation time.

US-Egypt Cooperative Research: Ultrasmall Silicon Nanoparticle Technology for Renewable Energy Applications: This NSF project aims to substantially advance renewable energy technology. The prototype devices to be built are expected to show enhanced performance in terms of energy harvest efficiency and energy storage capacities.

Acquisition of a 4G/LTE Wireless Communications Test Set: This Major Research Instrumentation grant from NSF is to acquire an E6621A PXT 4G/LTE wireless communication test set. The aim is to enable studies on security and privacy of 4G communications, fast indoor positioning in large-scale, chaotic venues, efficient modulation and coding for 4G mobile communications, characterization of noise in wireless channels with statistical physics approaches, and security of medical communication systems. The system will also enable research on complex topics that require multidisciplinary approaches.

Computing in Secondary Schools: Computer Science is a subject area that all of our high school graduates need at least some knowledge and familiarity with; yet the quality of Computer Science instruction in the United States high schools is far lower than necessary. The Computing in Secondary Schools program, funded by the NSF, is aimed at providing teacher professional development and online curriculum support to teachers across Ohio to teach the new Computer Science Principles course. The project is also exploring research questions surrounding the delivery of such professional development using online instruction.

The Game Changer: A New Model for Password Security: The motivation for this EAGER NSF project was the fact that existing systems are either memorable or secure, but not both. The plan is to develop a new model for password security which is secure, memorable, and usable.


Electrical Engineering and Computer Science


Sec

tio

n

4


Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

School of Nursing

Hot Extrusion of Ultraconductive Nanocomposite Copper: The project seeks to extend the ultra-conductivity results achieved in our patented (US Patent 8,347,944) work from the millimeter scale to longer ultra-conductive wire on the meter-Kilometer scale. The project also aims to prefect the manufacturing process that will be used to mass produce the ultra-conductive copper wire.

Ultraconductive Copper Wire: The Ultraconductive Copper (UCC) research team at Cleveland State University was successful at the development of nanocomposite Copper/Mg/MWCNT lab scale wire segments exhibiting higher electrical conductivity (ultraconductivity) at room temperature than pure metals including silver. The objective of this project funded by the Ohio Board of Regents is to develop a stable platform technology of UCC with a tangible program deliverable of a long length of UCC wire (several inches-foot), which can carry at least 10Amps at a conductivity of at least 40% above that of pure copper. Once refined and fully developed, this revolutionary, cost effective technology will have the disruptive potential to dramatically improve the performance and reduce the energy consumption of virtually all-electrical machines/devices. Much as carbon transformed iron to steel, carbon nanotubes are poised to transform copper and other metals into revolutionary ultraconductive materials.

Real-Time Simulation of Arm and Hand Movements: This project is part of a larger research program directed by the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. The ultimate goal is to control a robotic arm-hand prosthesis through simulation of a computer model of the intact musculoskeletal system. The model is driven in real time by electromyographical (EMG) recordings from the user’s residual muscles, supplemented by statistical models that generate EMG of the amputated muscles. The resulting control system is expected to provide a user interface that produces faster and more natural movements of the prosthetic arm.

Experimental and Computational Examination for a Direct Drive Cartridge Valve Used in Industrial Gas Turbine Fuel Control: This project, funded by the Parker Hannifin Corporation, utilizes state-of-the-art multi-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes such as ANYSYS Fluent and Simulink. These codes are used to determine the force needed to operate the main cartridge of the proportional valve validated by experimental data under different industrial operating conditions. This will result in a working prototype of a motor driven valve that can be utilized to explore options for improved valve performance.

Design, Control and Optimization of Robotic Systems with Energy Regeneration: This National Science Foundation project focuses on research in advanced methods for robot motion control with explicit regard to energy efficiency. The control theories being developed allow for optimal energy redistribution and storage among robotic joints and across robots in a manner compatible with motion control requirements. The technologies resulting from this research can be used in biomedical, industrial, and mobile robots.

ASHRAE Level II Commercial Energy Audits: This project has been sub-contracted from the University of Dayton Research Institute under the State of Ohio Development Services Agency for participating in the State Energy Program. It involves conducting and completing eight ASHRAE Level II commercial energy audits using faculty and students from CSU. The program aims at identifying clients, helping buildings become more energy efficient, and training students in energy efficiency.

In AY 2015-2016 CLASS faculty published or sent to the press a total of 13 books and 44 book chapters. Departments represented include Art, Communication, English, History, Music, Philosophy and Comparative Religion, Political Science, and World Languages, Literatures and Cultures. CLASS faculty also published 82 journal articles and gave 121 presentations at conferences and meetings. CLASS faculty from its Arts departments gave 79 creative performances and produced 54 creative works. New and continuing research was funded by 96 grants, some internal and others by the Cyrus Eaton Foundation for a Kennedy Center ACTF Student Coordinator and CAEC Project Support; Nord Family Foundation for CAEC Strengthening the Arts; DC Preservation League for Historic DC Web Platform; Ohio Arts Council; Cuyahoga County for Evaluation of Children Who Witness Violence Program; US Department of Education to Develop a Major in Arabic with an Emphasis on Translation; Teagle Foundation; the Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation for Inclusion in the Arts; and the State Library of Ohio for State Library of Ohio Bicentennial.

Geriatric Work Force Enhancement Program: Funding for three years from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) has established multi-site education initiative aimed at teaching health professions students to work in interprofessional teams. Students from various health care professions including nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, social work, speech and hearing, pharmacy, medicine, and spiritual care learn to work together through simulation, case studies, and the use of standardized patients. The program also works with professionals already working in health care to improve interprofessional team work and its application to management of patient health care.

Ohio Medicaid Technical Assistance & Policy Program (MedTAPP) Healthcare Access (HCA) Initiative: This continuing program is sponsored by the Ohio Department of Medicaid and administered by The Ohio State University. The CSU School of Nursing, working with project partners (the CSU School of Social Work, Sisters of Charity Foundation, St. Vincent Charity Medical Center, CareSource, Care Alliance, The MetroHealth

Mechanical Engineering

Nursing


System, and University Hospitals), trained 15 mentors and 39 mentees from the Schools of Nursing and Social Work (both undergraduate and graduate students) through a mentor training project. The objectives included increasing the health care practitioners working with Medicaid patients; facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration; and fostering readiness and knowledge of entry-level health care practitioners to meet the needs of the Medicaid population.

Educating for the Future of Nursing: Building Capacity with Nursing Educators - Nurse Faculty Loan Program (NFLP): Funding from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) enables CSU to offer forgivable loans to MSN and PhD Nursing candidates who plan to embark upon a career in Nursing education after graduation. Up to 85% of the loan is cancelled if the borrower completes four years of full-time employment as a faculty member at an accredited school of nursing.

Healing Hands at Home (3H): Preparing Nurses for Home Care Practice: Funding from The McGregor Foundation allows the CSU School of Nursing, in partnership with University Hospitals, to 1) develop a home care curriculum for nursing students, 2) develop a workforce-ready cadre of registered nurses prepared to practice in the care of geriatric patients in their home, and 3) to expose nursing students to geriatric home care experiences so that, through this experience, they may be more likely to choose home care and geriatrics as an employment option.

Area Health Education Center (AHEC): Continued funding for the Cleveland Regional Interprofessional (CRI) AHEC at Cleveland State University (CSU) addresses health concerns and well-being of the Northeast (NE) Ohio population through recruiting and advancing of education for students and health professionals by, (1) Provision of academic quality in order to succeed in the health professions (2), Commitment to primary care and preventative care health professions, (3) Commitment to serve the medically under-served who lack access to health care and (4) Provision of a student body and health professionals that represent the diversity and value of northeast Ohio. The purpose of the AHEC proposal was to bring an AHEC to the Cleveland area and surrounding counties.

MedTAPP Healthcare Access (HCA) Initiative Community Health Worker Program: Year two of funding from the Department of Health and Human Services, through the Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM), allowed the CSU School of Nursing to develop sustainable curriculum and training programs to recruit, train, and retain quality future healthcare professional to care for the underserved. Called I-Hope (Improved Health Outcomes of Populations through Education), the program is an interdisciplinary initiative designed to empower low-income residents with a high prevalence of chronic disease. Funding is being used to create a sustainable community support network of Community Health Workers which has additional training in chronic disease self-management concepts designed by Stanford University.

Choose Ohio First (COF) Nursing Scholarship Initiative: Funding from the State of Ohio provided scholarship support and mentoring for ten senior and ten junior nursing students. Criteria was based on financial need and academic merit. Each scholarship recipient is required to provide ten hours of service to the School of Nursing each semester during which a COF award is received.

Anton Komar and colleagues recently published a manuscript entitled “Synonymous Codons Direct Cotranslational Folding toward Different Protein Conformations” in the prestigious journal Molecular Cell (Impact factor 14). This manuscript has been recommended in F1000Prime as being of special significance in its field.

Roman Kondratov and colleagues recently published a manuscript entitled “Deficiency of circadian clock protein BMAL1 in mice results in a low bone mass phenotype” in Bone (Impact factor 3.7). This manuscript has been highlighted in Nature Reviews Rheumatology (Impact factor 35).

Bibo Li has renewed her NIH RO1 grant for the second time. The grant entitled “Mechanisms of RAP1 functions in monoallelic VSG expression in Trypanosoma brucei” has been funded for $2.2M and focuses on identifying novel therapeutic targets for anti-parasitic drugs.

Barsanjit Mazumder has renewed his NIH RO1 grant for the second time. The grant entitled “Translational silencing in monocytes: role of L13a” has been funded for $1.45M and focuses on identifying novel therapeutic targets to help resolve the chronic inflammation associated with etiology of heart disease.

Aaron Severson has been awarded an NIH R15 grant entitled “Specification of meiotic cohesin function by divergent alpha-kleisin subunits”. This funding of $349,200 will support research to understand the mechanism controlling appropriate chromosome segregation and reveal how defects in this machinery can lead to infertility.


Sciences and Health Professions

Center for Gene Regulation in Health and Disease (GRHD)


Sec

tio

n

4

Xue-Long Sun published a single-editor book in 2015: “Methods in Molecular Biology 1367: Macro-Glycoligand Methods and Protocols”, Xue-Long Sun, Editor (ISBN 978-1-4939-3130-9, Humana Press/Springer Science), 2015. In its first year of publication, it had over 2300 downloads.

Bin Su was awarded The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH awarde an AREA (R15) grant (second in a row) in the total amount of $436,500 for his research on discovery and development of novel antiprotozoal drugs. The title of the grant is “Selective tubulin inhibitors with improved cell update for kinetoplastid infections.” The research will help create novel drugs for treatment of trypanosomiasis, also known as sleeping sickness, a widespread tropical disease, caused by protozoan parasites belonging to the genus Trypanosoma. This grant involves collaboration with Dr. Bibo Li, BGES.

Aimin Zhou published a groundbreaking study devoted to the mechanism of maintenance of Ca2+ homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with his colleagues from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in the top journal Cell. The authors uncovered the function of the transmembrane protein (TMCO1) and showed that it is responsible for protecting Ca2+ stores from Ca2+ overload. Mutations in TMCO1 gene are known to be associated with TMCO1-defect syndrome, which is commonly leading to distinctive craniofacial dysmorphism, skeletal anomalies, mental retardation, ataxia, and many other clinical symptoms.

Anthony Berdis gave a platform presentation at “The Controlling the Cancer Summit 2016” in London, UK (May 17-19th) on “Non-Natural Nucleosides as Therapeutic Agents Against Glioblastoma”. The annual Controlling Cancer Summit is an international academic event attended by clinicians, academics and members of the pharmaceutical industry, representing a wide spectrum of cancer research, development and healthcare professionals.

Leah Gold Stella is coordinating a $600,000 program (funded by the National Science Foundation and the State of Ohio) entitled University Scholars in STEM and Choose Ohio First Success in Math, which provides scholarships for students majoring in a STEM-related field.

John Holcomb received $875,000 in funding from the National Science Foundation to conduct Operation STEM, an initiative to help students who begin mathematics classes at the pre-calculus level complete their mathematics requirements to obtain a STEM degree.

Carol Phillips-Bey is developing and conducting a professional development program, Building a Better On-Ramp for Advanced High School Mathematics, for mathematics teachers, to help them promote deep learning of mathematical content.

John Oprea received funding from the Simons Foundation for collaborative research in mathematics (Lie Models, Mapping Theorems, C-Kahler Manifolds and Topological Complexity).

Daniel Munther is working with colleagues on a NIMBIOS Conference grant to study pre-harvest produce food safety at the interface between mathematical modeling and empirical data.

Jenna Van Sickle received a $693,000 grant from the Ohio Department of Higher Education to develop a program (College Credit Plus Teacher Credentialing) to enable high school teachers to teach college-level courses.

A study published in Health Affairs, co-authored by Linda Quinn (Workers without Paid Sick Leave Less Likely to Take Time Off for Illness or Injury Compared to Those with Paid Sick Leave) is receiving national attention.

Yuping Wu received a $175,000 grant from the National Institutes of Health to study factors related to heart failure, and published findings (“Gut Microbial Metabolite TMAO Enhances Platelet Hyperreactivity and Thrombosis Risk”) in the highly regarded journal Cell.

Ulrich Zurcher - Studies of physiological time series, in particular the studies of noise or fluctuations. General topics in theoretical physics and physics education research.

Jacqueline Vitali - Crystallographic and EPR studies of copper dynamics in biological systems- Colaneri, M.J., Teat, S. J. and Vitali, J. (2015) Models for Copper Dynamic Behavior in Doped Cadmium DL-Histidine Crystals: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Crystallographic Analysis. Journal of Physical Chemistry A119, 11119-11127.

Structural and enzymatic studies of pyrimidine biosynthesis - presented and authored abstract: Vitali, J., Singh, A.K. and Colaneri, M.J. (2015) Characterization of Dihydroorotase from Methanococcus jannaschii. Amer. Cryst. Assoc. Annual meeting at Philadelphia, PA. Abstract M28.


Mathematics

Physics


Thijs Heus is a co-author of “Overlap Statistics of Shallow Boundary Layer Clouds: Comparing Ground-Based Observations with Large-Eddy Simulations,” published recently in the American Geophysical Union journal Geophysical Research Letters and featured as a Research Spotlight on Eos, a leading source for news about the Earth and space sciences.

Thijs Heus received a US Department of Energy grant for his research in characterizing the turbulent structure of the convective boundary layer using AR</ASR observation and LES modeling. To perform these computer simulations, a grant worth 100,000 node hours was acquired from the Ohio Supercomputer Center (OSC).

Valentin Gogonea received three NIH subcontracts from Cleveland Clinic totaling $203,918/year. His research involves structural and proteomics studies of oxidative modifications of high-density lipoproteins and their contribution to cardiovascular disease.

David Anderson had two papers published, in the Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Technique and the Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Doctoral clinical chemistry students received six awards at the 2015 national meeting of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, including four research/presentation awards and two $2000 travel awards.

David W. Ball continues his collaboration with researchers at the US Air Force Academy, contributing to one paper and one presentation at the ACS National Meeting in San Diego in March 2016. Also, he and an undergraduate student, Lisa Ina, published a paper on new potential high-energy materials in the Journal of Undergraduate Chemistry Research; a second paper with Lisa is currently being reviewed for publication. Dr. Ball and a graduate student, Will Martin, are collaborating with Dr. Michael Kalafatis on the structural changes in mutated thrombin proteins.

Mekki Bayachou received an R15 grant ($421,307) from the NIH on the topic of “Nitric Oxide Synthase-based Thin Films as Antithrombotic Coatings.” Nitric oxide (NO) is known to counteract thrombosis. NO-releasing materials have the potential to prolong vascular graft and stent potency without adverse results.

Yana Sandlers published a paper on the pathogenesis of Barth Syndrome in PLoS One. Her collaborators include researchers from Research Triangle International in North Carolina and the Johns Hopkins University Institute of Genetic Medicine.

Jerry Mundell hosted the 5th Annual Conference on General Chemistry in Mather Mansion in March 2016. Plenary speakers included Dr. John Hutchinson, Dean of Students, Rice University, and Norbert Pienta, director of freshman chemistry at the University of Georgia and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Chemical Education. Funding for the conference is provided by several textbook companies.

Fasong Yuan has received $120,000 in funding from the National Sea Grant Program for his proposal entitled “Anthropogenic phosphorus storage, bioavailability, and cycling in the Maumee Bay and western Lake Erie.” Dr. Yuan’s research will use seismic, geochemical, and isotopic tools to characterize the distribution of unconsolidated sediments, estimate the degree of phosphorus storage, and evaluate the extent of phosphorus availability and cycling

Emily Rauschert received a $5,983 grant from Geauga Park district to study the invasive plant species Lesser Celandine.

Katherine Judge and collaborators published a study of the impact of the care coordination program “Partners in Dementia Care” on Veterans’ Hospital admissions and emergency department visits, in the journal Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions.

Katherine Judge is adapting a successful intervention protocol (Project ANSWERS) for veterans who have suffered a stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their informal family caregivers, with funding from the Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Service ($1.1 M, 2013-2017).

Conor McLennan and recent Adult Development & Aging program graduate Sara Incera published several studies that used innovative research technology to shed new light on language and attentional processes.

Conor McLennan received funding from the Association for Psychological Science to create a video series of accessible talks on popular topics, given by prominent researchers in the Psychology of Language.

Michael Horvath is collaborating with Drs. Joanne Goodell and Bill Kosteas on a Multi-College Interdisciplinary Research Program: STEM Teacher Turnover and Identity. The project seeks to identify factors that lead preservice teachers to enter and continue in the teaching profession.


Chemistry(Except GRHD Faculty)

Biological, Geological & Environmental Sciences (BGES) (except GRHD faculty)

Psychology


Sec

tio

n

4

Kathy McNamara collaborated with colleagues in conducting and reporting the results of a comprehensive national assessment of the characteristics, employment circumstances, and professional activities of school psychologists (National Association of School Psychologists).

Albert F. Smith and colleagues published a study of factors correlated with the accuracy of children’s dietary reporting; such factors include cognitive ability, social desirability, body mass index, and socioeconomic status.

Ilya Yaroslavsky and collaborators at the University of Pittsburgh are studying attention and physiologic inflexibility as mechanisms for emotion regulation deficits, and their role in dysphoria, depressive symptoms, and risk for first-onset clinical depression among youth at high- and low-risk for depressive disorders; funding provided by the National Institute of Health.

Chieh-Chen Bowen recently published (Sage Publishing) a comprehensive textbook (Straightforward Statistics) offering a clear explanation of statistics and statistical analyses.

Albert F. Smith continued his study of the cognitive processes involved in perceiving words during reading, with funding from the Undergraduate Student Research Award program.

Glenn Goodman (PI), Beth Ekelman, Ann Reinthal and Debbie Espy: Safe Patient Handling among STNA’s in Nursing Homes: Compliance, Monitoring, and Continuous Quality Improvement of Best Practices. A grant from the Ohio Bureau of Worker’s Compensation to develop an innovative real-time monitoring system with haptic feedback to help STNA’s to recognize correct and incorrect postures and movements while performing patient handling tasks at bedside. Outcomes will be used to design and implement a pilot safe handling program at the Jennings Center for Older Adults.

Tony Sahley published Basic Fundamentals in Hearing Science. An approachable and straightforward textbook written primarily for undergraduate students preparing for graduate programs in speech therapy. Hearing science and speech therapy are multidisciplinary subjects rooted in physics, engineering, anatomy, physiology, cell biology and psychology.

Project AWARE (Advancing Wellness and Resilience in Education). Ohio Department of Education (ODE) 5 year grant from SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) for $1,924,316. Sue Bazyk is one of 6 regional affiliates and certified YMHFA (Youth Mental Health First Aid) instructors.

Susan Bazyk is PI for Mental health promotion, prevention and intervention in schools. Every Moment Counts is a mental health promotion initiative funded by the Ohio Department of Education, Office of Exceptional Children ($720,000). Building capacity of school personnel to meet mental health needs of students.

Mary Milidonis and Jane Keehan - Physical Therapy for Medically Underserved Adults, Faculty Scholarship Initiative, Cleveland State University.

Don Allensworth-Davies - (5/1/2015 – 6/30/2016) Examining Midwestern Rural and Urban Healthcare Provider Stigma Towards HIV Care, CEOMPH Intra-Partner Research Program, Co-PI, for $10,000.

Peer Reviewed Publications: Smith PC, Cheng DM, Allensworth-Davies D, Winter MR, Saitz R. Use of a single alcohol screening question to identify other drug use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 139:178-80.

Mary Milidonis, Violet Cox, Robin Chilton, Suzanne Giuffre - Tai Chi Light and Music Impact on Self Efficacy, Balance and Pain in Older Adults. Engaged Learning Grant, Cleveland State University

Madalynn Wendland - Advancing Locomotion in Young Children with Downs Syndrome. A clinical research program funded by an NIH R21 grant (via University of Delaware) to provide infants with Down syndrome with the training and technology to independently explore their world to the same degree as their typically developing peers.

Maureen Whitford and Glenn Goodman - Thrive Where You Are: A Collaborative Senior/Student Video Project to Promote Home Exercise and Activities in the Elderly. A collaborative study with the City of Cleveland Department of Aging focused on development of a series of activity and exercise videos for homebound seniors by an interdisciplinary intergenerational team; funded by a Community Based Participatory Research Grant from the CSU Civic Engagement Office.

Maureen Whitford - Effects of Short-Term High Dose Accelerometer-Based Feedback on Paretic Upper Extremity Use in Subjects Post-Stroke. An in-home study exploring the effect of accelerometer-based feedback on weaker arm use in people post-stroke; funded by a Research Grant from the Ohio Physical Therapy Association.


School of Health Sciences


Karen Keptner – Keptner, K., Harris, A., Mellyn, J., Neff, N., Rassie, N., & Thompson, K. Occupational therapy services to promote occupational performance, performance satisfaction, and quality of life in university freshmen: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 32(2), 185-202. doi:10.1080/0164212X.2015.1135094.

Colleen Walsh - Darcy, F. A., Vaudrin, N., Schneider, C., Trapl, E., Ohri-Vachaspati, P., Taggart, M.,Cascio, M.A., Walsh, C., Flocke, S. (2016). Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Farmers’ Market Use Overall and among Low-Income Populations. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Walsh, C., Taggart, M., Freedman, D. A., Trapl, E. S., & Borawski, E. A. (2015). The Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Food Policy Coalition: “We Have Evolved” Preventing Chronic Disease, 12(14053). Additions 2016.

Ladders to Success Federal Transit Authority Grant. The Federal Transit Authority in partnership with the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA) awarded a grant to the Levin College of Urban Affairs, Center for Leadership Development, to conduct professional development training for 60 employees. The two-year grant supports two cohorts of 30 employees each to attend 15 full-day sessions. The purpose of the grant is to improve the supervisory and managerial skills of GCRTA employees thereby increasing their chances for promotion into leadership positions and creating a career path for the management staff. Lisa Thomas, PhD is the principal investigator.

Lean Ohio Boot Camp, Ohio Department of Administrative Services. The Ohio Department of Administrative Services awarded a grant to the Levin College of Urban Affairs, Center for Leadership Development to provide Lean/Six Sigma training to local municipal government employees. More than 100 employees representing over 20 public agencies attended the 40-hour training program. Lean Ohio Boot Camp teaches the principles of Lean and Six Sigma, originally intended for manufacturing industries, but now applied to public sector organizations. Lisa Thomas, PhD is the principal investigator.

Newly Elected Officials Training, State Auditor’s Office. The Auditor of the State provided a grant to the Center for Leadership Development to conduct a two-day training program for newly-elected city council members. The training included public records law, ethics, public finance and the role and responsibilities of the legislature. Over 50 recently elected public officials from three northeast Ohio counties attended the training program. Lisa Thomas, PhD is the principal investigator.

The Center for Emergency Preparedness annually receives funding from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) to deliver hazmat classes at no charge to first responders in Ohio. The Center for Emergency Preparedness provides quality hazardous material, homeland security and business continuity training, taught by professionals utilizing industry standards and best practices.

City of Green: Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis of Proposed Nexus Natural Gas Pipeline on the City of Green, Ohio. The Center investigated the likely impact of building a segment of the Nexus pipeline through properties in the City of Green. The study found that placement of the pipeline would lead to substantial losses in property taxes and income tax for the City of Green.

NASA Glenn Research Center: The NASA Glenn Research Center: An Economic Impact Study Fiscal Year 2015. This study uses an input-output (I-O) model to estimate the effect of NASA Glenn’s FY 2015 spending on the economies of Northeast Ohio and Ohio. This model assesses economic impact in terms of five measures: output (sales), value added (output less intermediary goods), number of new and existing jobs, labor income, and tax revenues.

Ohio Manufacturing Institute, OSU: Best Practices of Creating Innovation Exchange Web Portals Across the States. The challenges to promoting innovative economic development practices using university-based web portals were studied. The study analyzed existing web portals in various states, addressed the role economic development agencies play in enhancing the successful utilization of a web portal.

JobsOhio: Economic Impact of Potential Expansions and Relocations. The Center partnered with JobsOhio, a private, non-profit economic development organization to assess the potential economic impact of companies looking to expand or relocate in Ohio. Potential economic impact was measured through new construction as well as operations of existing facilities (ranging from IT companies to manufacturing operations). The Center also assisted JobsOhio in preparing data for use in their annual report.

Economic Development Administration (EDA): University Center. As an EDA University Center, the Center focuses on providing technical assistance to local and state public and non-profit agencies, assisting in the advancement of innovation and high-tech clusters, strengthening the competitiveness of advanced manufacturers, advancing entrepreneurship and early-stage investments, promoting regional collaboration, supporting workforce development and strengthening the connection of distressed communities to economic drivers within the Northeast Ohio region.


Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs

Center for Leadership Development

Center forEmergency Preparedness

Center forEconomic Development


Sec

tio

n

4

Kauffman Foundation/JumpStart: Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. This project is a partnership between the Center and JumpStart Solutions funded by the Kauffman Foundation. JumpStart and CSU are assessing the entrepreneurial ecosystem framework offered by the Kauffman Foundation’s Stangler and Bell-Masterson (2015). In this mixed methods study, CSU is performing a statistical analysis to assess how different groups of high-growth firms are associated with economic growth. Jumpstart is interviewing entrepreneurs to validate the framework and assess entrepreneurial connectivity in the region.

JumpStart: Economic Impact 2015. This report measures the economic impact of early-stage companies that have been supported by JumpStart Inc. and its partners in the Northeast Ohio Entrepreneurial Signature Program in 2015. Companies included in this report have received significant technical assistance and often direct investment funding from entrepreneurial support organizations in the Entrepreneurial Signature Program.

Ohio Development Service Agency: Ohio Historic Preservation Tax Credit (OHPTC) Economic Impact Study. The study includes a number of analyses assessing different aspects of the OHPTC program. The descriptive analyses illustrate characteristics of the projects funded by the OHPTC program, address employment and population changes that occurred in areas surrounding the properties completed before 2015, and investigates property valuations and taxes collected from the properties before and after renovation. The economic impact analysis assesses the realized and expected economic impacts of these projects through employment, payroll, output, and value added data. The financial cost-benefit analysis evaluates the return on investment from the projects at the local and state level and addresses prospective analysis until 2030. In addition, the case studies provide a qualitative analysis of the impacts of OHPTC-funded projects on their communities.

Ohio Aerospace Institute: Economic Impact of Ohio Aerospace Institute, FY 1998-2015. This report assesses the contributions of the Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI) to the economy of the State of Ohio during the specific period of its 1998-2015 Fiscal Years. The impacts of OAI’s four main operating functions were assessed, including OAI operating expenses, OAI employee compensation, support to industry research and development and support for students and universities.

Forward Cities: The Forward Cities Cleveland Experience: Overview and Analysis. The City of Cleveland is part of Forward Cities, a four-city initiative focused on inclusive innovation and entrepreneurship. Forward Cities is a national learning collaborative, and its two-year pilot project includes the cities of Cleveland, Detroit, Durham, and New Orleans. Forward Cities gives participating cities an opportunity to: 1) explore issues of inclusive innovation (so that the city/region’s current entrepreneurial boom does not leave the most vulnerable behind); 2) identify the most effective ways for supporting and developing leaders, entrepreneurs and businesses in low income neighborhoods; and, 3) discuss strategies to build innovative leadership and an entrepreneurial workforce, especially in traditionally disconnected communities.

Cleveland Development Advisors: Analysis of the New Market Tax Credits. The Center prepared several reports for the Cleveland Development Advisors detailing four areas of study: economic impact of New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) projects, demographics of census tracts of NMTC projects, and payroll and employment data for regions around projects.

Cleveland Foundation: Evaluation of the Greater University Circle Community Wealth Building Initiative. The primary focus of the evaluation of this Initiative of the Greater University Circle Leadership Committee was to assess progress toward four goals: buy local, hire local, live local, and community engagement. The Center’s study assessed the overall governance, identified strengths and challenges, and measured the progress of specific strategies and programs implemented under each goal. Kathryn Hexter was the principal investigator.

The Center for Community Planning and Development worked with The Cleveland Foundation to create the Cleveland Foundation Public Service Fellowship program for recent College graduates. This year-long fellowship offers emerging young leaders from across the country the skills and experience they will need to launch careers in the public sector. Nine Fellows will be in residence yearlong in paid Fellowship placements in September 2016 with six public sector organizations in Greater Cleveland. The College is also developing a professional development training program for the fellows. Kathryn Hexter is the principal investigator.

Economic Inclusion of Greater University Circle Initiative: This grant has supported the Economic Inclusion Program of Greater University Circle, which works closely with the Cleveland Foundation and community partners to increase jobs, income and ownership opportunities for the residents of the Greater University Circle neighborhoods of Hough, Glenville, Fairfax, Central, Buckeye-Shaker, Little Italy and East Cleveland. In the past two years, numerous residents have been connected to jobs, entrepreneurship opportunities, training, and to one another, leveraging the economic might of the Cleveland Clinic, University Hospitals, and Case Western Reserve University to improve neighborhoods. As the data and evaluation partner, CSU has


Center for Community Planning and Development



tracked metrics and published a summary of the work in collaboration with the Democracy Collaborative (see Cleveland’s Greater University Circle Initiative: An Anchor Based Strategy for Change; Wright, Hexter and Downer, 2016). Kathryn Hexter is the principal investigator.

The Center has led a set of projects funded by the Nonprofit Academic Centers Council, including board leadership and development and service as host institution for national member organizations of Universities. Projects in 2016 include program development involving accreditation processes for nonprofit academic program pedagogy, and building the field as an autonomous body of research, education and service.

Professor Alan Weinstein published the article “Sign Regulation After Reed: Suggestions for Coping with Legal Uncertainty,” in 47 Urb. Law. 569 (2015) with co-author Brian J. Connolly. The article explores the Supreme Court’s 2014 Reed decision and its implications for local government sign regulation. Professor Weinstein also extended his work on the Reed case to summarize the significance of the case for local government practice with an article co-authored with Ms. Wendy Moeller, professional planner, entitled “Practice: Temporary Signs” in the professional journal Zoning Practice (February 2016) of the American Planning Association. The article discusses the best practices communities can use to regulate temporary signs in a post-Reed legal environment.

Dr. Rosie Tighe and Dr. Joanna Ganning published “Do Shrinking Cities Allow Redevelopment without Displacement? An Analysis of Affordability Based on Housing and Transportation Costs for Redeveloping, Declining, and Stable Neighborhoods” in a special issue of Housing Policy Debate. Based on the research done for that paper, the authors applied for and received a grant from the National Institute for Transportation and Communities to continue their work on housing and transportation. The current research will determine how accurate existing transportation and affordable housing estimates are for “shrinking cities,” using Cleveland as a case.

Dr. Robert Simons received funding from the Commercial Real Estate Services to complete a study to develop scoring methodologies to assess green buildings. Phase one of the study was funded by the same organization the previous year.

Associate Dean Wendy Kellogg received funding from the George Gund Foundation to support conceptual design and organization of a conference on Water Resilient Cities, held at the Levin College in April 2016. The conference focused on adaptation of urban water systems to climate change and was attended by 150 water-sector professionals and university researchers from across the Great Lakes basin.

Dr. Tatyana Guzman has published online “Does Local Government Coproduction Lead to Budget Adjustments? An Investigation of Boston, MA and San Francisco, CA” in the American Review of Public Administration. With co-author Ben Clark, the article demonstrates that information generated through 3-1-1 call centers has little to no effect for budget allocations in two cities, Boston and San Francisco. There is no resource benefit for the departments that use 3-1-1 systems compared to those who do not use 3-1-1.

Dr. Guzman also published “Economic Crises, Economic Structure, and State Credit Quality Through-the-Cycle” in Public Budgeting and Finance that found that state credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s are stable through-the-cycle, i.e. robust to ups and downs in national or state-specific business cycles. Economic concentration is inversely associated with state credit quality and remains significant for the period of an average business cycle.

Dr. Guzman also conducted a study on “Ohio Historic Preservation Tax Credit Economic Impact Study” (published by the Levin College) in Urban Publications. Paper 1334. The study was funded by the Development Service Agency of Ohio and found that Ohio Historic Preservation Tax Credit (OHPTC) has had a high economic/development impact in Ohio and has encouraged hundreds of rehabilitation projects of historic buildings in the state. The credit has not, however, generated positive net benefits for the government sector yet. Net positive returns are expected by the year 2023. Co-authors from the Urban Center include: Dr. Iryna Lendel, Candi Clouse, Ellen Cyran, Merissa Piazza, Dr. Stephanie Ryberg-Webster, Charlie Post, and Kenneth Kalynchuk.

Dr. Megan Hatch published “Statutory Protection For Renters: Classification of State Landlord-Tenant Policy Approaches” in Housing Policy Debate (online first at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10511482.2016.1155073). This research finds that there is significant variation among state landlord–tenant statutory policies, with states’ laws generally reflecting one of three philosophies: protectionist (states that adopt pro-renter legislation), pro-business (states that adopt pro-landlord legislation), and contradictory (states that adopt both pro-renter and pro-landlord legislation). These results are important for future studies on rental housing because treating all state rental environments the same masks important differences in rental experiences. Furthermore, understanding where renters have more or less legal protection allows policymakers and advocates to focus their efforts on areas where assistance is most needed.

Center for Nonprofit Policy & Practice

Urban Studies


Sec

tio

n

4


Joseph Mead, JD, published a series of articles this past year. The “First Amendment Protection of Charitable Speech” in the Ohio State Law Journal furthermore developed the argument for giving Constitutional protection to speech requesting donations. The argument has since been used to change laws in Akron and Youngstown. Mead also published, with M. Pollack, an article on “Courts, Constituencies, and Nonprofit Corporations: Judicial Enforcement of Fiduciary Duties in the Nonprofit Sector” in the University of Pittsburgh Law Review; an article on “Law and the Volunteer: The Uncertain Employment and Tort Law Implications of the Altruistic Worker” in Nonprofit Policy Forum; and with N. Fromherz, the article “Choosing a Court to Review the Executive” in the Administrative Law Review.

Dr. William Bowen and co-author Dr. Michael Schwartz published a book chapter entitled “Higher Education, Governance, and Academic Freedom” in (Re) Discovering University Autonomy: The Global Market Paradox of Stakeholder and Educational Values in Higher Education, published by Palgrave McMillan.

Dr. Nancy Meyer-Emerick’s book Using Social Marketing for Public Emergency Preparedness: Social Change for Resilient Communities was published by Routledge. This book applies the process of social marketing, which has been used widely in public health and other disciplines, to the lack of public preparedness in the U.S. Written for emergency managers in government and nonprofit agencies, students, and volunteers, the book provides enough background and resources to enable the user to carry out an effective emergency preparedness campaign in their community and maintain it over time.

Dr. Brian Mikelbank published with co-authors Kathy Hexter, Dr. Ben Clark, Charlie Post and Dr. Edward Hill, a book chapter “Revitalizing Distressed Older Suburbs,” in The New American Suburb: Poverty, Race and the Economic Crisis, Routledge. Dr. Mikelbank also received several grants for research on housing.

Dr. Stephanie Ryberg-Webster published three papers: “Beyond Rust and Rockefeller: Preserving Cleveland’s African American Heritage” in Preservation Education & Research; “The Landscape of Urban Preservation: A Spatial Analysis of Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits in Richmond, Virginia” in the Journal of Urban Affairs, on-line first; and “Urban Policy in Disguise: A History of Federal Tax Incentives for Historic Preservation” in the Journal of Planning History, on-line first.

Dr. Nick Zingale published with co-author Dr. Justin Piccorelli, “From Grout to Grip: Intentionality and the Freedom to Gain a Feel for the Work” in the journal Administration and Society.

Source: Highlights were submitted to the Office of Research by the Deans’ Offices of the Colleges.


Name Established Website

Bioethics Center 2002 http://www.csuohio.edu/class/bioethics/

Center for Advanced Control Technologies (CACT) 1995 http://cact.csuohio.edu/

Center for Advancements in Renewable Energy (CARE) 2010 http://www.csuohio.edu/engineering/care/home.html

Center for Arts and Innovation 2005 http://www.csuohio.edu/class/cai/

Center for Community Planning and Development 2009 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/community_planning/

Center for Economic Development 1986 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/economicdevelopment/

Center for Emergency Preparedness 1984 http://urban.csuohio.edu/cep/

Center for Gene Regulation in Health and Disease 2008 http://www.csuohio.edu/sciences/grhd.html

Center for Healing Across Cultures 2005 http://www.csuohio.edu/sciences/dept/chac/

Center for Health Law and Policy 2009 http://www.law.csuohio.edu/academics/chlp

Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship 2008 http://www.csuohio.edu/business/business-centers/ center-for-innovation-and-entrepreneurship

Center for Leadership Development 1993 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/leadership/

Center for Nonprofit Policy and Practice 1970 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/nonprofit/

Center for Population Dynamics 2014 http://urban.csuohio.edu/cpd/

Center for Public History and Digital Humanities 2008 http://csudigitalhumanities.org

Center for Public Management 1982 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/publicmanagement/

Center for Research in Electronics and Aerospace 2003 http://www.csuohio.edu/engineering/create/ Technology (CREATE)

Center for Rotating Machinery Dynamics and Control (RoMaDyC) 2006 http://academic.csuohio.edu/romadyc/

Center for Urban Education (CUE) 2010 http://www.csuohio.edu/cehs/centers/cue.html

Communication Research Center 1976 http://csuw3.csuohio.edu/class/com/CRChome.html

Criminology Research Center 2008 http://www.csuohio.edu/class/criminologyresearch/

Fenn Research and Development Institute (FRDI) 2009 http://www.csuohio.edu/engineering/frdi/home.html

Global Business Center 2002 http://www.csuohio.edu/business/global/

Great Lakes Environmental Finance Center 1995 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/glefc/

Housing Research and Policy Program 1982 http://urban.csuohio.edu/housing/

Northern Ohio Data and Information Service (NODIS) 1982 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/nodis/

Paul J. Everson Center for the Study of Real Estate 1992 http://www.csuohio.edu/business/realestate/ Brokerage/Agency and Markets

Poetry Center 1962 http://www.csuohio.edu/poetrycenter/

The Ohio Center for the Advancement of Women in Public Service 2001 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/womenscenter/

The Sustainable Business Center 2005 http://www.csuohio.edu/business/sustainability

The Urban Center 1979 http://www.urban.csuohio.edu/urban_center/

University Transportation Center 2004 http://www.csuohio.edu/engineering/utc/

Wright Center for Sensor System Engineering (WCSSE) 2007 http://www.csuohio.edu/research/wcsse/

Table 4.12: Cleveland State University Research Centers and Institutes

Notes: N/A Data unavailable; Source: http://www.csuohio.edu/research/centers.html


Sec

tio

n

4

Tabl

e 4.

13:

Past

Rec

ipie

nts

of D

isti

ngui

shed

Fac

ulty

Aw

ards

by

Aw

ard

Type

199

5-20

15

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Type

Aw

ard

T eac

hing

Ser

vice

Rese

arch

Year

Na

me

Depa

rtm

ent

Nam

e De

part

men

t Na

me

Depa

rtm

ent

1996

Sh

erw

ood

D . S

illim

an

Mat

hem

atic

s M

ural

i D. N

air

Soci

al W

ork

Sa

rah

Mat

thew

s So

ciol

ogy

1997

Ra

vind

ra R

. Kam

ath

Fina

nce

Davi

d F.

Fort

e La

w

Jose

J. L

abra

dor

Mod

ern

Lang

uage

s

Robe

rt N

. Sol

lod

Psyc

holo

gy

1998

W

illia

m A

. Bea

sley

Cu

rric

ulum

& F

ound

atio

ns

Vale

rie D

. Geo

rge

Nurs

ing

Rich

ard

Bing

ham

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

M

ajid

Ras

hidi

M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

Ed

war

d W

. Hill

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

1999

Sa

nda

Kauf

man

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

Ly

nn D

eerin

g HP

ERD

Ram

a S.

R. G

orla

M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

Jo

hn P

. Wils

on

Psyc

holo

gy

Rich

ard

M. P

erlo

ff Co

mm

unic

atio

n

2000

Ed

war

d G.

Tho

mas

M

arke

ting

Davi

d At

kin

Com

mun

icat

ion

M

icha

el J

. Tev

esz

BGES

2001

Le

e A.

Mak

ala

Hist

ory

Ji

ll M

. Bla

ck

HPER

D Th

omas

Don

alds

on

Art

He

idi M

eier

Ac

coun

ting

Norm

an K

rum

holz

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

Jo

hn G

repp

in

Engl

ish

2002

Da

vid

W. B

all

Chem

istr

y Da

niel

D. D

rake

CA

SAL

Mar

k As

hcra

ft Ps

ycho

logy

Ca

roly

n Li

n Co

mm

unic

atio

n

2003

Gl

enn

Good

man

Oc

cupa

tiona

l The

rapy

Pa

tric

ia F

alk

Law

Ba

hman

Gho

rash

i Ch

emic

al E

ngin

eerin

g

Ralp

h M

a wds

ley

C ASA

L Bh

usha

n W

adhw

a M

athe

mat

ics

Baoc

huan

Guo

Ch

emis

try

2004

Ra

ma

S. R

. Gor

la

Mec

hani

cal E

ngin

eerin

g

Susa

n E.

Kog

ler H

ill

Com

mun

icat

ion

Andr

ew R

indfl

eisc

h M

usic

El

izab

eth

Wel

fel

CASA

L M

ieko

K. S

mith

So

cial

Wor

k

Jerz

y T.

Saw

icki

M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

2005

Er

ic Z

iole

k M

usic

Ra

vind

ra R

. Kam

ath

Fina

nce

Mic

hael

Kal

afat

is

Chem

istr

y

John

P. H

olco

mb,

Jr.

Mat

hem

atic

s Ch

eryl

P. M

cCah

on

Nurs

ing

Cath

erin

e Ha

nsm

an

CASA

L

2006

Do

nald

Ram

os

Hist

ory

Andr

ew G

ross

M

arke

ting

Leo

W.J

effr

es

Com

mun

icat

ion

Ei

leen

Ber

lin R

ay

Com

mun

icat

ion

Orha

n Ta

lu

Chem

ical

& B

iom

edic

al

Engi

neer

ing

2007

St

ephe

n La

zaru

s La

w

Lily

Ng

Chem

istr

y M

iron

Kauf

man

Ph

ysic

s

Mek

ki B

ayac

hou

Chem

istr

y

2008

El

liot R

. Ing

erso

ll CA

SAL

Shel

don

Gelm

an

Law

An

gelin

Cha

ng

Mus

ic

Davi

d F.

Fort

e La

w

Barb

ara

H. M

argo

lius

Mat

hem

atic

s Jo

hn F.

Opr

ea

Mat

hem

atic

s

2009

Je

arl D

. Wal

ker

Phys

ics

Barb

ara

K. M

odne

y BG

ES

Crys

tal M

. Wey

man

BG

ES

Mur

ali D

. Nai

r So

cial

Wor

k W

illia

m M

. Bow

en

Urba

n St

udie

s De

na S

. Dav

is

Law

2010

Su

san

S. B

azyk

He

alth

Sci

ence

s Da

vid

Bell

Chem

istr

y Jo

hn A

.C. G

repp

in

Engl

ish

Su

san

J. B

ecke

r La

w

Mag

gie

Jack

son

Soci

al W

ork

Bars

anjit

Maz

umde

r BG

ES

2011

Di

nah

Volk

Te

ache

r Edu

catio

n Be

th E

kelm

an

Heal

th S

cien

ces

Jam

es L

ock

Phys

ics

V e

ra V

ogel

sang

-Coo

mbs

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

Mar

y El

len

Wai

the

Philo

soph

y


Tabl

e 4.

13:

Past

Rec

ipie

nts

of D

isti

ngui

shed

Fac

ulty

Aw

ards

by

Aw

ard

Type

199

5-20

15

2012

Ka

thry

n C.

Mac

Clus

kie

CASA

L Ro

nald

J. A

bate

Te

ache

r Edu

catio

n Xu

e-Lo

ng S

un

Chem

istr

y

John

J. J

ezio

row

ski

Heal

th S

cien

ces

Chris

toph

er a

. Mal

ler

Soci

al W

ork

2013

Pe

ter S

. Dun

ham

An

thro

polo

gy

Ashu

tosh

Dix

it M

arke

ting

Siu-

Tung

Yau

El

ectr

ical

& C

ompu

ter E

ngin

eerin

g

Cath

erin

e H.

Mon

agha

n CA

SAL

Kenn

eth

E. S

park

s He

alth

, Phy

sica

l Edu

catio

n,

Just

in C

lem

ent P

erry

CA

SAL

Recr

eatio

n, a

nd D

ance

2014

M

ekki

Bay

acho

u Ch

emis

try

Joan

ne E

lizab

eth

Good

ell

Teac

her E

duca

tion

Am

in Z

hou

Chem

istr

y

Jill

E. R

udd

Com

mun

icat

ion

Mic

hael

J. G

eith

er

Engl

ish

Sam

anth

a Ba

skin

d

Art

2015

Ho

lly A

. Hol

sing

er

Thea

ter a

nd D

ance

Jo

rge

E. G

atic

a Ch

emic

al a

nd B

iom

edic

al

Dan

iel S

imon

El

ectr

ical

and

Com

pute

r

En

gine

erin

g

Bria

n E.

Har

per

Curr

icul

um a

nd F

ound

atio

ns

En

gine

erin

g C

hris

toph

er L

. Sag

ers

Law

2016

M

icha

el B

orde

n La

w

Cher

yl B

rack

en

Com

mun

icat

ion

Ant

on K

omar

Bi

olog

y, Ge

olog

y &

Env

ironm

enta

l

Sc

ienc

e

Pong

Chu

El

ectr

ical

and

Com

pute

r Jo

an T

hom

an

Nurs

ing

Kat

herin

e Ju

dge

Psyc

holo

gy

Engi

neer

ing

So

urce

: CS

U P

rovo

st’s

Offi

ce

Type

Aw

ard

Teac

hing

Ser

vice

Rese

arch

Year

Na

me

Depa

rtm

ent

Nam

e De

part

men

t Na

me

Depa

rtm

ent

Sec

tio

n

5

Retention & Graduation

5Book of Trends

101Section 5 - Retention & Graduation

Sec

tio

n

5

Fa

ll 20

10 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

11 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

12 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

13 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

14 C

ohor

t

Fall

10

Fall

11

Fa

ll 11

Fa

ll 12

Fall

12

Fall

13

Fa

ll 13

Fa

ll 14

Fall

14

Fall

15

Ne

wly

Ret.

New

ly

Re

t. Ne

wly

Ret.

New

ly

Re

t. Ne

wly

Ret.

Enro

lled

Retu

rn

Rate

En

rolle

d Re

turn

Ra

te

Enro

lled

Retu

rn

Rate

En

rolle

d Re

turn

Ra

te

Enro

lled

Retu

rn

Rate

Whi

te

704

5

00

71%

86

1 60

4 70

%

973

697

72%

1,

114

809

73%

1,

018

752

74%

F

353

2

40

68%

46

5 31

5 68

%

520

369

71%

61

3 43

4 71

%

535

391

73%

M

35

1

260

74

%

396

289

73%

45

3 32

8 72

%

501

375

75%

48

3 36

1 75

%Bl

ack/

Afric

an A

mer

ican

22

4

100

45

%

266

123

46%

29

1 15

2 52

%

301

174

58%

24

3 14

3 59

%F

15

1

66

44

%

171

81

47%

19

9 10

4 52

%

213

117

55%

14

9 87

58

%M

73

34

47

%

95

42

44%

92

48

52

%

88

57

65%

94

56

60

%Hi

span

ic/L

atin

o

75

44

59

%

62

35

56%

91

55

60

%

106

70

66%

95

57

60

%F

42

2

7

64%

34

20

59

%

41

23

56%

59

40

68

%

56

32

57%

M

33

1

7

52%

28

15

54

%

50

32

64%

47

30

64

%

39

25

64%

Asia

n 26

1

8

69%

28

20

71

%

49

40

82%

48

42

88

%

47

39

83%

F

15

10

67

%

12

9 75

%

22

17

77%

22

20

91

%

21

18

86%

M

11

8

73

%

16

11

69%

27

23

85

%

26

22

85%

26

21

81

%Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

4

3

75%

1

1 10

0%

5 2

40%

5

2 40

%

2 2

100%

Nativ

e

F

2

2

100%

0

0 0%

3

2 67

%

3 1

33%

1

1 10

0%M

2

1

50%

1

1 10

0%

2 0

0%

2 1

50%

1

1 10

0%Na

tive

Haw

aiia

n or

Oth

er

1

-

0%

- -

- 2

2 10

0%

2 1

50%

2

1 50

%P a

cific

Isla

nd

F

-

-

- -

- -

2 2

100%

2

1 50

%

1 -

0%

M

1

-

0%

-

- -

- -

- -

- -

1 1

100%

Non

Resi

dent

Alie

n 31

2

7

87%

23

22

96

%

33

25

76%

62

57

92

%

61

49

80%

F

8

7

88%

8

8 10

0%

8 7

88%

6

5 83

%

15

12

80%

M

23

2

0

87%

15

14

93

%

25

18

72%

56

52

93

%

46

37

80%

Two

or m

ore

race

s 15

1

1

73%

64

39

61

%

65

39

60%

70

36

51

%

73

46

63%

F

9

6

67%

38

21

55

%

50

29

58%

43

21

49

%

44

25

57%

M

6

5

83

%

26

18

69%

15

10

67

%

27

15

56%

29

21

72

%Un

know

n 68

5

4

79%

23

16

70

%

22

17

77%

21

14

67

%

21

15

71%

F

35

28

80

%

14

9 64

%

8 5

63%

10

6

60%

9

6 67

%M

33

26

79

%

9 7

78%

14

12

86

%

11

8 73

%

12

9 75

%To

tal F

emal

e &

Mal

e 1

,148

7

57

66%

1,

328

860

65%

1,

531

1029

67

%

1,72

9 1,

205

70%

1,

562

1,10

4 71

%F

61

5

386

63

%

742

463

62%

85

3 55

8 65

%

971

645

66%

83

1 57

2 69

%M

533

3

71

70%

58

6 39

7 68

%

678

471

69%

75

8 56

0 74

%

731

532

73%

Tabl

e 5.

1: F

all t

o Fa

ll R

eten

tion

Rat

es fo

r IP

EDS

Coh

ort

by E

thni

city

and

Gen

der

(N

e w D

egre

e-Se

ekin

g, F

ull-

Tim

e, F

irst

-Tim

e Fi

rst Y

ear)

En

r olle

d Fa

ll 20

10-2

014

/ R

etur

ned

Fall

2011

-201

5


Tabl

e 5.

2: F

all t

o Fa

ll Re

tent

ion

Rate

s fo

r IP

EDS

Coh

ort (

New

Deg

ree-

Seek

ing,

Ful

l-Tim

e) b

y C

olle

ge

Enro

lled

Fall

2010

-201

4 /

Ret

urne

d Fa

ll 20

11-2

015

Fa

ll 20

10 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

11 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

12 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

13 C

ohor

t Fa

ll 20

14 C

ohor

t

Fall

10

Fall

11

Fa

ll 11

Fa

ll 12

Fall

12

Fall

13

Fa

ll 13

Fa

ll 14

Fall

14

Fall

15

Ret.

Ret.

Ret.

Ret.

Ret.

Enro

lled

Retu

rn

Rate

En

rolle

d Re

turn

Ra

te

Enro

lled

Retu

rn

Rate

En

rolle

d Re

turn

Ra

te

Enro

lled

Retu

rn

Rate

Busi

ness

1

32

87

66

%

139

7

9

57%

1

85

118

64

%

239

1

73

72%

2

27

170

75

%CL

ASS

344

2

21

64%

4

65

287

62

%

448

2

89

65%

5

17

355

69

%

431

3

06

71%

Educ

atio

n 8

5

50

59

%

89

5

1

57%

6

9

43

62

%

97

5

7

59%

5

5

38

69

%En

gine

erin

g 1

37

101

74

%

148

1

19

80%

2

03

162

80

%

215

1

79

83%

2

23

170

76

%Nu

rsin

g 1

18

75

64

%

82

5

7

70%

1

16

80

69

%

135

9

2

68%

1

21

79

65

%Sc

ienc

e 2

82

193

68

%

316

2

23

71%

3

93

283

72

%

416

2

88

69%

3

57

256

72

%Ur

ban

Affa

irs

9

8

89%

1

3

9

69%

9

7

78

%

8

5

63%

1

2

10

83

%Un

derg

radu

ate

Stud

ies

41

2

2

54%

7

6

35

46

%

108

4

7

44%

1

02

56

55

%

136

7

5

55%

TOTA

L 1

,148

7

57

66%

1

,328

8

60

65%

1

,531

1

,029

67

%

1,7

29

1,2

05

70%

1

,562

1

,104

71

%


Sec

tio

n

5

Table 5.3: Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (IPEDS Cohort)Fall

Fall 2008 Cohort 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Attended 1,007 665 529 453 240 89 36 21 Graduated - - 4 27 226 351 402 419 % Graduated of Cohort 0% 0% 0% 3% 22% 35% 40% 42%% Retained 100% 66% 53% 46% 31% 14% 6% 4%

Figure 5.3: Fall 2008 IPEDS Cohort Attended, Graduated and Retained

Table 5.4: Attended, Graduated and Retained Fall to Fall Student Tracking (Transfer Cohort*)

Fall

Fall 2008 Cohort 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Attended 872 635 382 170 63 35 14 8 Graduated - 43 227 410 492 523 538 548 % Graduated of Cohort 0% 5% 26% 47% 56% 60% 62% 63%% Retained 100% 77% 59% 37% 17% 10% 4% 2%

Figure 5.4: Fall 2008 Full-Time Transfer Cohort Attended & Graduated*

Notes: Cohorts are First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking Freshmen or Transfers students as of Fall Semester 2008 enrollment file. “Attended” or “Graduated” status is determined from the IR enrollment and graduation tables for each term listed. These charts measure the number of students who have graduated by the end of a given fall semester. Offical IPEDS graduation rates are based on the number of students who graduate by the end of each summer semester. See table 5.5a for official 6 year grad rates.


Table 5.5a: Undergraduate First-Year, Full-Time Degree-Seeking IPEDS Cohort Graduation

Cohort Cohort Size 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year 7th Year 8th Year

Fall 2005 955

Graduated 0 0 6 108 222 286 308 315

% Graduated 0% 0% 1% 11% 23% 30% 32% 33%

Fall 2006 947

Graduated 0 0 6 107 259 318 350 363

% Graduated 0% 0% 1% 11% 27% 34% 37% 38%

Fall 2007 1,132

Graduated 0 1 15 121 276 361 385 401

% Graduated 0% 0% 1% 11% 24% 32% 34% 35%

Fall 2008 1,007

Graduated 0 2 14 150 324 395 415

% Graduated 0% 0% 1% 15% 32% 39% 41%

Fall 2009 1,127

Graduated 0 2 10 181 361 437

% Graduated 0% 0% 1% 16% 32% 39%

Fall 2010 1,148

Graduated 0 5 25 237 416

% Graduated 0% 0% 2% 21% 36%

Fall 2011 1,328

Graduated 0 3 25 292

% Graduated 0% 0% 2% 22%

Fall 2012 1,531

Graduated 0 3 48

% Graduated 0% 0% 3%

Fall 2013 1,729

Graduated 0 4

% Graduated 0% 0%

Fall 2014 1,562

Graduated 0

% Graduated 0%

Graduated: represents the cumulative number of distinct cohort students receiving a CSU baccalaureate award between the student’s first term and the term prior to a given year.


Sec

tio

n

5

Tabl

e 5.

5b: U

nder

grad

uate

Fir

st-Y

ear,

Full-

Tim

e D

egre

e-Se

ekin

g IP

EDS

Coh

ort

Ret

enti

on R

ate

Enro

lled:

repr

esen

ts th

e nu

mbe

r of c

ohor

t stu

dent

s en

rolle

d as

an

unde

rgra

duat

e in

a g

iven

term

exc

ludi

ng th

ose

who

ha

ve re

ceive

d a

bach

elor

’s d

egre

e fro

m C

SU p

rior t

o th

e re

porte

d te

rm.

Grad

uatio

n: W

e ha

ve d

ecid

ed to

add

gra

duat

ion

data

to th

is ta

ble.

Unl

ike

enro

llmen

t num

bers

, whi

ch re

pres

ent t

he

disc

rete

num

ber o

f stu

dent

s en

rolle

d in

a g

iven

term

, gra

duat

ion

num

bers

repr

esen

t the

tota

l num

ber o

f stu

dent

s fro

m th

e co

hort

who

hav

e gr

adua

ted

up to

a g

iven

poin

t in

time.

Add

ition

ally,

gra

duat

ion

data

lags

beh

ind

enro

llmen

t dat

a; a

s su

ch,

ther

e ar

e ty

pica

lly tw

o se

mes

ters

for a

give

n co

hort

whi

ch w

e ha

ve c

ompl

ete

enro

llmen

t dat

a bu

t inc

ompl

ete

grad

uatio

n da

ta. I

n th

ese

two

sem

este

rs, w

e do

not

cal

cula

te th

e “%

Gra

d,” “

% E

nrol

led/

Grad

,” or

the

% S

topp

ed O

ut” r

ates

.No

te: C

ohor

t Defi

nitio

n 1)

A s

tude

nt a

ttend

ing

any

inst

itutio

n of

hig

her l

earn

ing

for t

he fi

rst t

ime

at th

e un

derg

radu

ate

leve

l, in

clud

es s

tude

nts

enro

lled

in th

e fa

ll te

rm w

ho a

ttend

ed c

olle

ge fo

r the

firs

t tim

e in

the

prio

r sum

mer

term

, als

o in

clud

es s

tude

nts

who

en

tere

d CS

U w

ith a

dvan

ced

stan

ding

(col

lege

cre

dits

ear

ned

befo

re g

radu

atio

n fro

m h

igh

scho

ol).

2) B

y th

e un

ivers

ity c

ensu

s da

te, t

he s

tude

nt h

as re

gist

ered

for 1

2 or

mor

e cr

edit

hour

s in

the

fall

sem

este

r.

3) T

he s

tude

nt is

see

king

a b

acca

laur

eate

deg

ree.

Ye

ar O

ne

Year

Two

Year

Thr

ee

Year

Fou

r Ye

ar F

ive

Year

Six

Ye

ar S

even

Ye

ar E

ight

TERM

Coho

rt Si

ze

1st S

prin

g 2n

d Fa

ll 2n

d Sp

ring

3rd

Fall

3rd

Sprin

g 4t

h Fa

ll 4t

h Sp

ring

5th

Fall

5th

Sprin

g 6t

h Fa

ll 6t

h Sp

ring

7th

Fall

7th

Sprin

g 8t

h Fa

ll 8t

h Sp

ring

Fall

2007

En

rolle

d 1,

132

962

647

595

510

482

435

352

261

176

107

74

50

34

23

14

% S

till E

nrol

led

85

%

57%

53

%

45%

43

%

38%

31

%

23%

16

%

9%

7%

4%

3%

2%

1%

Grad

uate

d

1 2

11

23

94

182

255

324

349

372

384

393

399

%

Gra

duat

ed

0%

0%

1%

2%

8%

16

%

23%

29

%

31%

33

%

34%

35

%

35%

St

oppe

d Ou

t

170

485

536

620

639

674

686

689

701

701

709

710

714

716

719

%

Sto

pped

Out

15%

43

%

47%

55

%

56%

60

%

61%

61

%

62%

62

%

63%

63

%

63%

63

%

64%

Fall

2008

En

rolle

d 1,

007

884

665

606

529

482

453

349

240

141

89

59

36

28

% S

till E

nrol

led

88

%

66%

60

%

53%

48

%

45%

35

%

24%

14

%

9%

6%

4%

3%

Grad

uate

d

1 4

13

27

128

226

313

351

386

402

411

% G

radu

ated

0%

0%

1%

3%

13%

22

%

31%

35

%

38%

40

%

41%

St

oppe

d Ou

t

123

342

400

474

512

527

530

541

553

567

562

569

568

% S

topp

ed O

ut

12

%

34%

40

%

47%

51

%

52%

53

%

54%

55

%

56%

56

%

57%

56

%

Fa

ll 20

09

Enro

lled

1,12

7 96

9 71

8 63

0 55

9 52

4 50

4 35

5 26

0 14

7 96

62

%

Stil

l Enr

olle

d

86%

64

%

56%

50

%

46%

45

%

31%

23

%

13%

9%

6%

Gr

adua

ted

1

3 9

22

158

249

345

401

429

% G

radu

ated

0%

0%

1%

2%

14%

22

%

31%

36

%

38%

St

oppe

d Ou

t

158

409

496

565

594

601

614

618

635

630

636

% S

topp

ed O

ut

14

%

36%

44

%

50%

53

%

53%

54

%

55%

56

%

56%

56

%

Fa

ll 20

10

Enro

lled

1,14

8 99

1 75

7 68

1 61

9 58

2 52

5 34

7 22

4 12

4

%

Stil

l Enr

olle

d

86%

66

%

59%

54

%

51%

46

%

30%

20

%

11%

Gr

adua

ted

4

7 20

41

20

0 31

1 40

6

%

Gra

duat

ed

0%

1%

2%

4%

17

%

27%

35

%

Stop

ped

Out

15

7 39

1 46

3 52

2 54

6 58

2 60

1 61

4 61

9

%

Sto

pped

Out

14%

34

%

40%

45

%

48%

51

%

52%

53

%

54%

F all

2011

En

rolle

d 1,

328

1157

86

0 81

0 72

2 68

1 63

2 40

5

%

Stil

l Enr

olle

d

87%

65

%

61%

54

%

51%

48

%

30%

Gr

adua

ted

1 2

6 22

49

26

8

%

Gra

duat

ed

0%

0%

0%

2%

4%

20%

St

oppe

d Ou

t

171

467

516

600

625

647

655

% S

topp

ed O

ut

13

%

35%

39

%

45%

47

%

49%

49

%

Fa

ll 20

12

Enro

lled

1,53

1 13

73

1029

92

7 82

3 75

9

%

Stil

l Enr

olle

d

90%

67

%

61%

54

%

50%

Gr

adua

ted

2

7 40

%

Gra

duat

ed

0%

0%

3%

St

oppe

d Ou

t

158

502

602

701

732

% S

topp

ed O

ut

10

%

33%

39

%

46%

48

%

Fa

ll 20

13

Enro

lled

1,72

9 15

57

1205

10

62

% S

till E

nrol

led

90

%

70%

61

%

Grad

uate

d

0

3

%

Gra

duat

ed

0%

0%

Stop

ped

Out

17

2 52

4 66

4

%

Sto

pped

Out

10%

30

%

38%

Fall

2014

En

rolle

d 1,

562

1380

%

Stil

l Enr

olle

d

88%

Gr

adua

ted

% G

radu

ated

St

oppe

d Ou

t

182

% S

topp

ed O

ut

Fa

ll 20

15

Enro

lled

1,84

7 16

55

% S

till E

nrol

led

90

%

Grad

uate

d

0

%

Gra

duat

ed

0%

St

oppe

d Ou

t

192

% S

topp

ed O

ut

10

%


Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e

Ac

coun

ting

53

4

1

42

3

6

40

3

9

32

3

8

31

4

1

3%

-23%

Bu

sine

ss E

cono

mic

s 4

1

1

3

8

2

8

3

10

1

5

-5

4%

-60%

Co

mpu

ter a

nd In

form

atio

n Sc

ienc

e 3

1

6

2

8

3

18

2

1

6

5

20

39

%

32%

Co

mpu

ter S

cien

ce

-

4

-

1

-

7

1

3

-

2

-50%

-5

0%

Fina

nce

22

3

9

13

2

8

16

3

1

8

25

1

3

35

45

%

-21%

Ge

nera

l Bus

ines

s 55

4

1

47

5

9

57

5

4

54

4

7

60

5

4

13%

19

%

Gene

ral B

usin

ess

- M

obile

-

- -

- -

- 1

1

6

7

55

0%

--

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

1

23

8

2

7

7

18

2

2

1

4

19

0%

-4

%

Inte

rnat

iona

l Bus

ines

s 1

4

18

2

0

20

1

3

13

1

0

5

7

9

7%

-50%

M

anag

emen

t & L

abor

Rel

atio

ns

36

1

7

23

1

8

24

7

1

6

13

1

6

8

-17%

-5

5%

Mar

k etin

g 2

7

42

2

8

33

3

0

28

2

1

29

2

1

25

-8

%

-33%

Op

erat

ions

& S

uppl

y Ch

ain

3

17

4

1

3

7

25

1

1

26

1

9

23

14

%

110%

M

anag

emen

t

Tota

l

218

2

69

190

2

51

199

2

48

161

2

34

183

2

48

9%

-11%

Tabl

e 5.

7: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- C

olle

ge o

f Bus

ines

s

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e 1,

100

817

1,19

2 87

4 1,

210

907

1,28

8 96

4 1

,355

9

62

3%

21%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

798

580

830

633

798

628

806

550

838

6

22

8%

6%Po

st-M

aste

r’s C

ertifi

cate

16

7

19

4 12

7

19

2 1

3

7

-5%

-1

3%Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

23

23

13

22

24

20

22

16

34

2

5

55%

28

%Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

96

125

98

106

79

99

92

100

70

7

7

-23%

-3

3%To

tal

2,03

3

1,5

52

2,1

52

1,6

39

2,1

23

1,6

61

2,2

27

1,6

32

2,3

10

1,6

93

4%

12%

Note

s: D

egre

es/C

ertifi

cate

s aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Inc

lude

s Al

tern

ate

Degr

ees

Two

stud

ents

’ lev

els

wer

e co

rrect

ed fr

om 2

010-

2011

(1 B

ache

lor’s

Pub

lic A

dmin

istra

tion

was

mov

ed to

Mas

ter’s

Pub

lic A

dmin

istra

tion

and

1 Ba

chel

or’s

in S

ocia

l Wor

k w

as m

oved

to M

aste

r’s S

ocia

l Wor

k)

Tabl

e 5.

6: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by A

cade

mic

Lev

el a

nd G

ende

r -

Uni

vers

ity

Tota

l


Sec

tio

n

5

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revi

ous

page

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

Ac

cele

rate

d Bu

sine

ss A

dmin

istr

atio

n 5

1

2

16

1

4

11

2

4

13

1

2

11

1

3

-4%

41

%

Acce

lera

ted

Mob

ile M

BA

-

-

-

-

2

6

8

11

8

9

-1

1%

--

Busi

ness

Adm

inis

trat

ion

105

1

61

95

1

47

99

1

50

111

1

11

96

1

32

3%

-14%

Co

mpu

ter a

nd In

for m

atio

n Sc

ienc

e 1

0

22

8

1

8

6

18

1

0

12

1

2

9

-5%

-3

4%

Exec

utiv

e Bu

sine

ss A

dmin

istr

atio

n 5

1

2

6

12

8

1

5

4

12

9

1

4

44%

35

%

Fina

ncia

l Acc

ount

ing

and

Audi

t 3

0

12

2

7

31

4

2

32

2

9

41

3

5

37

3%

71

%

Labo

r Rel

atio

ns &

Hum

an R

esou

rces

2

1

5

12

1

0

21

8

2

6

9

26

4

-1

4%

15%

M

BA-H

ealth

Car

e 8

1

0

10

9

8

2

8

2

1

0

7

70%

-6

%

Tax

Prog

ram

4

7

6

9

8

9

4

7

1

2

9

91%

91

%To

tal

188

2

41

180

2

50

205

2

64

213

2

17

219

2

34

5%

6%Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

Co

mpu

ter a

nd In

form

atio

n Sc

ienc

e -

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Fi

nanc

e 1

-

1

-

-

1

-

1

1

-

0%

0%

In

form

atio

n Sy

stem

s -

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-1

00%

--

La

bor R

elat

ions

and

Hum

an R

esc

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Mar

ketin

g -

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

1

-

0%

--

M

arke

ting-

Glob

al B

usin

ess

Spec

ializ

atio

n -

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

2

10

0%

--

Oper

atio

n M

anag

emen

t & B

usin

ess

-

2

-

1

-

-

-

1

2

2

300%

10

0%

St

atis

tics

Tota

l

1

3

1

3

-

1

1

4

4

4

60%

10

0%To

tal B

usin

ess

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

218

2

69

190

2

51

199

2

48

161

2

34

183

2

48

9%

-11%

M

aste

r’s D

egre

e 1

88

241

1

80

250

2

05

264

2

13

217

2

19

234

5%

6%

Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

1

3

1

3

-

1

1

4

4

4

60%

10

0%To

tal

407

5

13

371

5

04

404

5

13

375

4

55

406

4

86

7%

-3%

Note

s: D

egre

es/C

ertifi

cate

s aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s

Tabl

e 5.

7: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- C

olle

ge o

f Bus

ines

s


cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Tabl

e 5.

8: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- C

olle

ge o

f Lib

eral

Art

s an

d So

cial

Sci

ence

s

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e

Anth

ropo

logy

7

7

1

4

7

12

1

1

7

5

21

7

13

3%

100%

Ar

t 2

6

23

2

1

6

4

2

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Art E

duca

tion

-

-

2

1

2

1

8

-

1

1

-75%

--

Ar

t His

tory

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

1

-

2

-6

0%

--

Blac

k St

udie

s -

-

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

-

-1

00%

--

Cl

assi

cal a

nd M

edie

val S

tudi

es

1

1

-

1

-

-

-

3

1

2

0%

50%

Co

mm

unic

atio

n 4

8

42

3

4

26

2

7

23

3

1

19

2

6

23

-2

%

-46%

Co

mm

unic

atio

n M

anag

emen

t 1

1

8

8

2

15

4

9

8

1

1

7

6%

-5%

Co

mpa

rativ

e Re

ligio

n 2

1

1

3

-

4

5

6

4

-

-

-100

%

-100

%

Crim

inol

ogy

38

3

2

41

2

5

32

3

5

36

4

1

41

3

0

-8%

1%

Dr

amat

ic A

rts

4

5

-

-

3

3

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Econ

omic

s 3

8

6

4

3

6

2

1

1

2

12

8%

27

%

Engl

ish

38

1

9

46

1

6

42

2

3

25

1

6

25

1

0

-15%

-3

9%

Engl

ish-

Crea

tive

Writ

ing

Trac

k -

-

-

-

-

-

4

5

9

7

78

%

--

Engl

ish-

Seco

ndar

y Li

c Tr

ack

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

4

5

350%

--

Fi

lm, T

V an

d In

tera

ctiv

e M

edia

9

2

7

12

2

0

7

26

1

0

21

1

3

18

0%

-1

4%

Fren

ch

2

-

1

-

1

1

1

2

6

3

200%

35

0%

Hist

ory

7

21

7

2

4

9

33

1

2

17

8

1

1

-34%

-3

2%

Inte

rnat

iona

l Rel

atio

ns

6

4

5

11

7

1

4

21

1

1

10

8

-4

4%

80%

Jo

urna

lism

& P

rom

otio

nal

34

1

4

27

2

5

32

1

5

28

2

5

37

1

8

4%

15%

Co

mm

unic

atio

n

Libe

ral S

tudi

es

8

5

7

6

6

4

13

5

8

6

-2

2%

8%

Ling

uist

ics

6

1

5

2

7

1

2

1

3

1

33%

-4

3%

Mus

ic

4

6

2

4

-

-

-

4

2

3

25%

-5

0%

Mus

ic C

ompo

sitio

n -

-

-

-

1

-

-

3

-

-

-1

00%

--

M

usic

Edu

catio

n -

-

2

1

5

1

4

2

-

3

-5

0%

--

Mus

ic P

erfo

rman

ce

-

-

-

2

3

3

3

3

1

1

-67%

--

M

usic

The

rapy

-

-

-

-

3

-

2

1

3

-

0%

--

Ph

iloso

phy

3

5

-

3

1

8

1

6

2

5

0%

-13%

Ph

iloso

phy

- Et

hics

Tra

ck

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

1

0%

0%

Polit

ical

Sci

ence

1

8

23

2

3

17

1

7

17

1

1

22

1

2

19

-6

%

-24%

So

cial

Sci

ence

-

-

2

-

2

-

1

1

1

-

-5

0%

--

Soci

al S

tudi

es

-

9

1

7

3

9

2

11

2

4

-5

4%

-33%

So

cial

Wor

k 6

8

12

6

9

15

7

6

18

8

0

25

7

1

20

-1

3%

14%

So

ciol

ogy

33

1

6

46

2

4

31

2

7

41

2

7

54

1

5

1%

41%

Sp

anis

h 9

1

8

3

7

8

1

6

2

14

3

-6

%

70%

St

udio

Art

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-1

00%

--

St

udio

Art

: Dra

win

g -

-

-

-

3

-

5

2

-

1

-8

6%

--

Stud

io A

rt: G

raph

ic D

esig

n -

-

4

1

7

1

8

1

4

10

7

-2

3%

--


Sec

tio

n

5

Tabl

e 5.

8: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- C

olle

ge o

f Lib

eral

Art

s an

d So

cial

Sci

ence

sco

ntin

ued

from

pre

viou

s pa

ge

Perc

ent C

hang

e

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e co

ntin

ued

St

udio

Art

: Pai

ntin

g -

-

1

2

4

1

2

-

2

-

0%

--

St

udio

Art

: Pho

togr

aphy

-

-

-

-

3

2

3

3

5

1

0%

--

St

udio

Art

: Prin

t Mak

ing

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

1

-

0%

--

Stud

io A

rt: S

culp

ture

-

-

-

-

-

-

3

2

1

1

-6

0%

--

Thea

tre

Arts

-

-

4

-

-

-

1

6

4

2

-1

4%

--

Wom

en’s

Stu

dies

5

-

3

-

2

-

-

-

1

-

--

-8

0%To

tal

391

3

00

404

2

56

381

3

02

404

3

33

412

2

57

-9%

-3

%M

aste

r’s D

egre

e

Com

mun

icat

ion

Theo

ry a

nd

10

5

7

6

2

3

3

2

1

4

0%

-6

7%

Met

hodo

logy

Ec

onom

ics

2

10

5

5

4

6

3

8

5

1

3

64%

50

%

Engl

ish

8

5

6

3

7

3

13

3

8

6

-1

3%

8%

Glob

al In

tera

ctio

n -

-

6

9

9

7

5

6

8

6

27

%

--

Hist

ory

7

7

6

11

6

8

3

7

4

3

-3

0%

-50%

Hi

stor

y -

Mus

eum

Stu

dies

2

1

--

--

M

aste

r of F

ine

Arts

-Cre

ativ

e W

ritin

g 5

2

1

2

7

3

3

2

2

2

-2

0%

-43%

M

usic

9

9

6

1

1

4

5

8

3

4

6

-9%

-4

4%

Philo

soph

y -

1

4

5

-

3

-

6

1

1

-6

7%

100%

So

cial

Wor

k 4

9

9

52

1

3

62

1

6

74

1

5

87

1

3

12%

72

%

Soci

olog

y 1

0

4

9

2

11

2

9

2

1

2

1

18%

-7

%

Span

ish

7

2

4

-

1

5

5

-

2

1

-40%

-6

7%To

tal

107

5

4

106

6

7

113

6

1

126

5

4

136

5

7

7%

20%

T ota

l CLA

SS

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e 3

91

300

4

04

256

3

81

302

4

04

333

4

12

257

-9

%

-3%

M

aste

r’s D

egre

e 1

07

54

1

06

67

1

13

61

1

26

54

1

36

57

7%

20

%To

tal

4

98

354

5

10

323

4

94

363

5

30

387

5

48

314

-6

%

1%

Note

: De

gree

s/Ce

rtific

ates

aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s


cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Tabl

e 5.

9: A

nnua

l Aw

ards

by

Maj

or a

nd G

ende

r -

Col

lege

of E

duca

tion

and

Hum

an S

ervi

ces

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revi

ous

page

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

eEa

rly C

hild

hood

Edu

catio

n 6

1

2

60

7

4

8

5

58

6

6

1

8

8%

10%

Exer

cise

/Fitn

ess

Spec

ialis

t 2

2

1

5

5

4

4

7

4

3

-3

6%

75%

Mid

dle

Child

hood

Edu

catio

n 1

7

11

6

4

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Mid

dle

Child

hood

Lan

guag

e Ar

ts a

nd M

ath

-

-

4

-

2

-

5

-

6

1

40%

--

Mid

dle

Child

hood

Lan

guag

e Ar

ts a

nd S

cien

ce

-

-

1

-

3

-

2

-

1

-

-50%

--

Mid

dle

Child

hood

Lan

guag

e Ar

ts a

nd S

ocia

l Stu

dies

-

-

2

1

6

1

5

1

3

4

17%

--

Mid

dle

Child

hood

Mat

h an

d Sc

ienc

e -

-

3

3

6

4

9

5

5

7

-1

4%

--M

iddl

e Ch

ildho

od M

ath

and

Soci

al S

tudi

es

-

-

2

1

1

3

2

6

3

4

-13%

--

Mid

dle

Child

hood

Sci

ence

and

Soc

ial S

tudi

es

-

-

-

1

1

-

2

3

1

1

-60%

--

Mild

/Mod

erat

e Ed

ucat

iona

l Nee

d 2

3

4

24

4

2

4

5

22

7

2

1

4

-14%

-7

%M

oder

ate/

Inte

nsiv

e Ed

ucat

iona

l Nee

ds

14

1

1

3

-

16

1

1

2

1

7

3

-23%

-3

3%Ph

ysic

al E

duca

tion

4

5

1

6

1

4

3

1

2

2

0%

-56%

Spor

ts M

anag

emen

t 2

5

1

5

2

6

3

3

1

2

-5

0%

-57%

Tota

l

12

3

30

1

18

37

1

15

33

1

27

40

1

15

39

-8

%

1%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

Adul

t Lea

rnin

g an

d De

velo

pmen

t 3

2

4

45

6

3

8

10

3

0

4

38

1

1

44%

36

%Cu

rric

ulum

and

Inst

ruct

ion

Tota

l 1

83

51

1

87

51

1

41

51

1

37

43

1

42

45

4%

-2

0%

Curr

icul

um a

nd In

stru

ctio

n 1

83

51

1

87

51

1

41

51

-

-

-

-

--

--

C&

I-Chi

nese

Lan

guag

e -

-

-

-

-

-

6

1

4

1

-2

9%

--

C&I-E

arly

Chi

ld In

terv

Spe

c -

-

-

-

-

-

1

0

1

7

4

0%

--

C&I-E

arly

Chi

ldho

od E

duc

-

-

-

-

-

-

17

1

1

6

1

-6%

--

C&

I-Edu

catio

n Re

sear

ch

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

2

1

2

0%

--

C&I-E

duca

tiona

l Tec

hnol

ogy

-

-

-

-

-

-

7

13

2

7

10

85

%

--

C&I-E

lem

enta

ry

- -

- -

- -

- -

1

-

--

--

C&I-G

ifted

& T

alen

ted

Lear

ners

-

-

-

-

-

-

9

-

1

0

1

22%

--

C&

I-Lite

racy

Dev

elop

men

t-TE

SOL

-

-

-

-

-

-

6

1

10

3

86

%

--

C&I-L

iter a

cy D

ev-R

eadi

ng

-

-

-

-

-

-

19

3

1

4

-

-36%

--

C&

I-Mild

/ M

oder

ate

-

-

-

-

-

-

37

8

3

0

14

-2

%

--

C&I-M

oder

ate

/ Int

ensi

ve

-

-

-

-

-

-

16

4

1

4

2

-20%

--

C&

I-Sc h

ool H

ealth

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

1

-5

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dar y

-Art

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

-

0%

--

C&

I-Sec

onda

ry-E

nglis

h -

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

1

-

-5

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-Mat

h -

- -

- -

-

- 1

-

--

C&I-S

econ

dar y

-MUS

T-En

glis

h -

-

-

-

-

-

5

-

1

3

-2

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-MUS

T-M

ath

- -

- -

- -

-

-

1

--

C&

I-Sec

onda

ry-M

UST-

Mod

ern

Lang

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

2

-

10

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-MUS

T-Sc

ienc

e -

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

2

10

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dar y

-MUS

T-So

cial

Stu

d -

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

2

-

-5

0%

--

C&I-S

econ

dary

-Sci

ence

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

-

-

-1

00%

--


Sec

tio

n

5

Tabl

e 5.

9: A

nnua

l Aw

ards

by

Maj

or a

nd G

ende

r -

Col

lege

of E

duca

tion

and

Hum

an S

ervi

ces

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revi

ous

page

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

cont

inue

d

Clin

ical

Men

tal H

ealth

Cns

ling

-

-

10

2

-

-

2

1

3

13

3

-3

3%

--Co

mm

unity

Age

ncy

Coun

selin

g 1

7

3

-

-

14

2

-

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Edu

catio

n 5

1

6

1

2

-

5

-

9

3

14

0%

100%

Coun

selo

r Edu

catio

n 2

4

4

30

4

-

-

9

2

1

2

2

27%

-5

0%Ed

ucat

iona

l Adm

inis

trat

ion

19

1

3

13

9

5

8

1

5

12

1

4

3

-37%

-4

7%Ex

erci

se S

cien

ce

12

3

9

4

1

1

13

1

3

13

1

8

9

4%

80%

Mas

ter o

f Pub

lic H

ealth

5

5

4

6

4

1

5

-

-

-

-1

00%

-1

00%

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip

4

3

9

3

3

4

1

1

-

-

-100

%

-100

%Sc

hool

Cou

nsel

ing

-

-

-

-

10

5

-

-

-

-

--

--

Spor

ts M

anag

emen

t 3

8

5

1

0

4

4

3

8

3

10

18

%

18%

Spor

ts M

anag

emen

t & E

xer c

ise

Scie

nce

1

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%Su

per v

isio

n 1

-

2

-

-

-

-

1

1

-

0%

0%

Tota

l

306

95

320

96

232

99

238

87

250

86

3%

-16%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

teEd

Sp

in A

d -

Pupi

l Svc

s Ad

min

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

1

0%

--

Ed S

p in

Ad

- Su

perin

tend

ent

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

--

--Ed

Sp

in A

d -

Prin

cipa

l -

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

2

1

50

%

--Ed

ucat

ion

Adm

in S

peci

alis

t -

-

9

1

-

-

1

-

1

-

0%

--

Educ

atio

n Ad

min

istr

atio

n 8

4

-

-

4

3

-

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

Tota

l

8

4

9

1

4

3

4

-

4

3

75

%

-42%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

hUr

ban

Ed: A

dmin

istr

atio

n 3

1

2

1

1

1

-

1

-

-

-1

00%

-1

00%

Urba

n Ed

ucat

ion:

Cou

nsel

ing

Psyc

holo

gy

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

1

-

-50%

--

Urba

n Ed

ucat

ion:

Cou

nsel

ing

Psyc

holo

gy

-

-

1

-

4

1

2

-

5

2

250%

--

Urba

n Ed

ucat

ion:

Pol

icy

2

1

1

-

2

-

1

-

2

-

100%

-3

3%Ur

ban

Educ

atio

n: L

earn

ing

& De

velo

pmen

t 2

2

-

1

3

1

3

1

2

1

-2

5%

-25%

Urba

n Ed

ucat

ion:

Lea

ders

hip

& Li

fe-lo

ng L

earn

ing

3

1

1

1

5

-

1

1

2

1

50%

-2

5%To

tal

10

5

5

3

1

5

3

8

4

12

4

33

%

7%To

tal C

olle

ge o

f Edu

catio

n an

d Hu

man

Ser

vice

sBa

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

123

3

0

118

3

7

115

3

3

127

4

0

115

3

9

-8%

1%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

306

95

32

0 96

23

2 99

23

8 87

25

0 86

3%

-1

6%Po

st-M

aste

r’s C

ertifi

cate

8

4

9

1

4

3

4

-

4

3

75

%

-42%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h 1

0

5

5

3

15

3

8

4

1

2

4

33%

7%

Tota

l

447

134

452

137

366

138

377

131

381

132

1%

-12%

Note

s: D

egre

es/C

ertifi

cate

s aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s


Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e

Chem

ical

Eng

inee

ring

2

5

6

13

5

1

8

8

17

1

2

15

8%

28

6%

Civi

l Eng

inee

ring

1

13

7

1

8

6

16

3

1

8

6

15

0%

50

%

Com

pute

r Eng

inee

ring

1

6

-

14

-

5

-

7

3

1

7

186%

18

6%

Elec

tric

al E

ngin

eerin

g 5

2

6

5

31

6

3

0

3

32

4

2

7

-11%

0%

El

ectr

onic

Eng

inee

ring

Tech

nolo

gy

3

11

1

2

1

1

13

1

1

2

-

13

0%

-7

%

Indu

stria

l Eng

inee

ring

2

1

-

-

-

1

-

1

-

-

-100

%

-100

%

Mec

hani

cal E

ngin

eerin

g 3

2

2

5

37

3

4

6

5

43

1

3

37

4%

10

0%

Mec

hani

cal E

ngin

eerin

g Te

chno

logy

2

8

1

1

6

-

9

2

12

1

1

2

-7%

30

%To

tal

19

9

2

25

1

50

21

1

38

22

1

42

39

1

36

7%

58%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

Bi

omed

ical

Eng

inee

ring

3

3

5

7

3

10

5

1

0

5

8

-13%

11

7%

Chem

ical

Eng

inee

ring

1

5

5

8

2

4

2

5

4

8

71%

10

0%

Civi

l Eng

inee

ring

2

20

3

1

1

2

9

6

11

6

1

9

47%

14

%

Elec

tric

al &

Com

pute

r Eng

inee

ring

-

-

-

-

16

3

5

-

-

--

--

Elec

tric

al E

ngin

eerin

g 1

0

39

1

2

55

-

-

7

5

0

18

1

02

111%

14

5%

Engi

neer

ing

Mec

hani

cs

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-100

%

-100

%

Envi

ronm

enta

l Eng

inee

ring

-

2

1

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

--

0%

Indu

stria

l Eng

inee

ring

-

17

3

1

3

-

7

-

4

3

10

22

5%

-24%

M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

3

15

1

0

12

-

1

4

5

11

3

1

2

-6%

-1

7%

Softw

are

Engi

neer

ing

2

8

1

4

1

15

3

1

1

8

8

14%

60

%To

tal

21

1

10

40

1

10

24

9

4

28

1

03

48

1

68

65%

65

%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h

Appl

ied

Biom

edic

al E

ngin

eerin

g 2

4

-

1

2

4

-

-

-

5

--

-1

7%

Chem

ical

Eng

inee

ring

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Civi

l Eng

inee

ring

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

2

-

-

-100

%

-100

%

Elec

tric

al &

Com

pute

r Eng

inee

ring

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Elec

tric

al E

ngin

eerin

g -

1

1

5

-

-

-

2

2

2

10

0%

300%

In

dust

rial E

ngin

eerin

g -

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

M

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

-

-

-

1

-

1

-

1

-

-

-100

%

--T o

tal

2

7

1

8

2

5

-

5

2

7

80

%

0%

Tota

l Eng

inee

ring

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

19

9

2

25

1

50

21

1

38

22

1

42

39

1

36

7%

58%

M

aste

r’s D

egre

e 2

1

110

4

0

110

2

4

94

2

8

103

4

8

168

65

%

65%

Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

2

7

1

8

2

5

-

5

2

7

80%

0%

T ota

l

42

209

6

6

268

4

7

237

5

0

250

8

9

311

33

%

59%

Note

: De

gree

s/Ce

rtific

ates

aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s

Tabl

e 5.

10: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- C

olle

ge o

f Eng

inee

ring


Sec

tio

n

5

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

Maj

or

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e

Nurs

ing,

BSN

(NUR

, NUR

BCCC

) 1

6

2

11

1

7

1

9

2

6

3

-1

8%

-50%

Nu

rsin

g, B

SN -

Acc

eler

ated

6

3

16

5

2

11

5

5

12

5

4

10

5

0

12

-3

%

-22%

Nu

rsin

g, B

SN (L

K) (N

URLK

) 1

-

2

-

1

-

1

-

-

-

-1

00%

-1

00%

Nu

rsin

g, B

SN/R

N (N

UB,N

UBBC

CC,N

UBPB

) 3

0

9

43

9

6

1

8

63

1

2

55

1

5

-7%

79

%To

tal

110

2

7

108

2

1

124

2

1

127

2

4

111

3

0

-7%

3%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

Nu

rsin

g (G

NR)

17

1

1

3

-

5

1

19

1

1

2

-

-40%

-3

3%To

tal

17

1

1

3

-

5

1

19

1

1

2

-

-40%

-3

3%

Tota

l Nur

sing

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

110

2

7

108

2

1

124

2

1

127

2

4

111

3

0

-7%

3%

M

aste

r’s D

egre

e 1

7

1

13

-

5

1

1

9

1

12

-

-4

0%

-33%

Tota

l

12

7

28

1

21

21

1

29

22

1

46

25

1

23

30

-1

1%

-1%

Note

: De

gree

s/Ce

rtific

ates

aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

arDe

gree

Lev

el

Maj

or

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e

Biol

ogy

32

1

5

46

3

0

51

4

4

53

3

4

52

3

4

-1%

83

%

Biol

ogy

- In

tegr

ated

Sci

ence

1

-

Bi

olog

y-M

edic

al T

echn

olog

y 2

-

1

0

2

10

1

5

2

8

5

86

%

550%

Ch

emis

try

7

8

3

11

1

0

8

6

10

1

1

10

31

%

40%

En

viro

nmen

tal S

cien

ces

6

4

2

9

6

11

9

1

4

10

1

2

-4%

12

0%

Geol

ogic

al S

cien

ces

1

1

2

3

-

2

2

1

-

3

0%

50%

He

alth

Sci

ence

Pod

iatr

y -

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

He

alth

Sci

ence

Pre

-Occ

upat

iona

l The

rapy

5

2

2

6

7

23

7

2

5

7

33

2

9%

40

0%

Heal

th S

cien

ce P

re-P

hysi

cal T

hera

py

15

7

1

7

13

1

6

11

1

6

18

1

9

19

12

%

73%

He

alth

Sci

ence

Pre

-Phy

sici

an A

ssis

tant

2

2

1

4

2

17

6

1

7

6

19

1

3

39%

70

0%

Heal

th S

cien

ces

BS

45

1

6

47

2

0

57

1

8

92

3

2

98

4

6

16%

13

6%

Mat

hem

atic

s 5

1

1

9

13

3

1

2

9

19

9

1

7

-7%

63

%

Phar

mac

eutic

al S

cien

ce

1

1

-

-

1

-

1

1

2

3

150%

15

0%

Phar

mac

eutic

al S

cien

ces

Adm

inst

ratio

n -

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

2

--

--

Tr

ack

Ph

ysic

s -

5

2

9

-

6

3

3

2

5

17

%

40%

Ps

ycho

logy

1

05

43

1

21

34

1

57

52

1

79

49

1

65

47

-7

%

43%

Ps

ycho

logy

(LR)

1

4

5

21

9

-

-

-

-

4

0

10

--

16

3%

Spee

ch &

Hea

ring

7

1

16

2

2

1

-

31

3

2

3

3

-24%

22

5%To

tal

247

1

21

337

1

64

373

1

78

448

1

99

492

2

31

12%

96

%

Tabl

e 5.

12: A

nnua

l Aw

ards

by

Maj

or a

nd G

ende

r -

Col

lege

of S

cien

ces

and

Hea

lth

Prof

essi

ons

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Tabl

e 5.

11: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- Sc

hool

of N

ursi

ng


cont

inue

d fro

m p

revi

ous

page

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Y e

ar

5 Y e

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

F e

mal

e M

ale

F em

ale

Mal

e F e

mal

e M

ale

F em

ale

Mal

e F e

mal

e M

ale

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

Ap

plie

d St

atis

tics

-

1

-

3

2

5

3

2

3

4

40%

60

0%

Biol

ogy

5

2

4

6

4

5

3

3

3

3

0%

-14%

Ch

emis

try

7

5

3

12

1

1

8

9

7

8

9

6%

42%

En

viro

nmen

tal S

cien

ces

1

-

3

-

2

1

2

-

-

-

-100

%

-100

%

Hea

lth S

cien

ce

24

8

2

5

12

1

0

5

30

1

0

10

5

-6

3%

-53%

H

ealth

Sci

ence

- Ph

y. A

. Tra

ck

1

1

1

-

25

1

0

4

2

18

6

30

0%

1100

%

Mat

hem

atic

s 4

8

4

1

2

6

5

9

5

3

4

-50%

-4

2%

Med

ical

Phy

sics

-

1

O

ccup

atio

nal T

hera

py

28

1

2

3

5

28

4

2

5

4

38

6

52

%

52%

Ph

ysic

al T

hera

py

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Phys

ics

3

1

-

3

2

5

-

9

1

2

-67%

-2

5%

Phys

ics

- O

ptic

s an

d M

edic

al Im

agin

g 1

1

-

-

-

-

1

-

1

-

0%

-5

0%

Spec

ializ

atio

n

Psyc

holo

gy

1

1

2

-

3

1

2

1

-

-

-100

%

-100

%

Psyc

holo

gy -

Clin

ical

3

1

5

2

1

1

5

8

3

5

1

-45%

50

%

Psyc

holo

gy-C

ons.

Indu

s.Re

sear

ch

-

-

1

1

1

-

4

2

-

-

-100

%

--

Psyc

holo

gy-D

iver

sity

Mgm

t 6

1

7

2

9

3

7

2

8

3

22

%

57%

Ps

ycho

logy

-Exp

erim

enta

l 3

5

3

2

4

1

2

1

3

1

33

%

-50%

Ps

ycho

logy

-Ind

ustr

ial/O

rg R

sch

2

-

Psyc

holo

gy-S

choo

l 8

2

5

2

1

2

2

8

1

6

1

-22%

-3

0%

Publ

ic H

ealth

(MPH

-CEO

) -

-

-

-

-

-

5

2

9

2

57

%

--

Spee

c h P

atho

logy

and

Aud

iolo

gy

13

-

3

0

1

28

-

1

7

2

24

-

26

%

85%

Tota

l

10

8

38

1

16

63

1

58

60

1

39

56

1

42

48

-3

%

30%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

Psyc

holo

gy S

peci

alis

t 8

3

9

2

6

2

1

3

1

7

1

-43%

-2

7%

Tota

l

8

3

9

2

6

2

13

1

7

1

-4

3%

-27%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h

Adul

t Dev

elop

men

t & A

ging

PhD

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

1

-

0%

--

Cl

inic

al-B

ioan

alyt

ical

Che

mis

try

4

4

2

3

3

6

7

1

6

5

38%

38

%

Regu

lato

ry B

iolo

gy

4

2

4

2

2

2

3

1

8

4

200%

10

0%

Tota

l

8

6

6

5

5

8

1

1

2

15

9

85

%

71%

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l

Doct

or o

f Phy

sica

l The

rapy

2

2

9

22

9

1

6

7

26

1

1

21

1

6

0%

19%

Tota

l

2

2

9

22

9

1

6

7

26

1

1

21

1

6

0%

19%

Tota

l Sci

ence

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e 2

47

121

3

37

164

3

73

178

4

48

199

4

92

231

12

%

96%

M

aste

r’s D

egre

e 1

08

38

1

16

63

1

58

60

1

39

56

1

42

48

-3

%

30%

Po

st-M

aste

r’s C

ertifi

cate

8

3

9

2

6

2

1

3

1

7

1

-43%

-2

7%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h 8

6

6

5

5

8

1

1

2

15

9

85

%

71%

Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

22

9

2

2

9

16

7

2

6

11

2

1

16

0%

19

%To

tal

393

1

77

490

2

43

558

2

55

637

2

69

677

3

05

8%

72%

Note

: De

gree

s/Ce

rtific

ates

aw

arde

d Su

mm

er th

roug

h Sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s

Tabl

e 5.

12: A

nnua

l Aw

ards

by

Maj

or a

nd G

ende

r -

Col

lege

of S

cien

ces

and

Hea

lth

Prof

essi

ons


Sec

tio

n

5

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Stu

dies

2

1

5

4

1

-

5

1

4

5

50

%

200%

No

nPro

fit A

dmin

istr

atio

n 1

5

2

23

4

1

6

5

12

4

2

3

4

69%

59

%

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip

9

6

16

8

1

4

7

6

3

6

2

-11%

-4

7%

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip

Com

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

-

Or

gani

zatio

nal L

eade

rshi

p M

gmt

-

-

-

-

3

2

8

6

13

5

29

%

--

Publ

ic S

afet

y M

anag

emen

t -

4

6

8

-

1

1

4

10

3

1

9

57%

45

0%

Publ

ic S

afet

y M

anag

emen

t (LK

) 1

1

2

4

1

1

-

-

-

3

--

50

%

Urba

n St

udie

s -

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-1

00%

--

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

(LR)

3

1

5

1

2

2

3

2

-

-

-1

00%

-1

00%

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

- En

v Po

l & M

gmt

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

2

--

--

Urba

n St

udie

s -

Publ

ic M

gmt

16

1

7

17

2

0

15

1

6

18

2

2

14

7

-4

8%

-36%

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

- Re

gion

al P

lng

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5

6

--

--To

tal

46

32

7

4

49

5

2

44

5

7

48

7

4

53

21

%

63%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

Ec

onom

ic D

evel

opm

ent

0 3

--

--

Envi

ronm

enta

l Stu

dies

3

4

-

-

8

3

-

-

-

-

--

-1

00%

En

viro

nmen

tal S

tudi

es a

nd L

aw

1

1

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Envi

ronm

enta

l Stu

dies

M.A

. -

-

6

1

0

-

-

-

4

2

1

-25%

--

En

viro

nmen

tal S

usta

inab

ility

-

-

-

2

--

--

Ge

ogra

phic

Info

rmat

ion

Syst

ems

-

-

-

2

--

--

Hist

oric

Pre

serv

atio

n Sp

ecia

list

-

-

1

-

--

--

Hous

ing

& Ne

ighb

orho

od D

evel

op

-

-

-

1

--

--

NonP

rofit

Adm

in &

Lea

ders

hip

6

2

13

1

1

0

2

8

1

5

2

-22%

-1

3%

NonP

rofit

Man

agem

ent

-

-

4

-

--

--

Publ

ic A

dmin

Acc

el 4

+1

-

1

-

1

-

-

-

-

1

1

--

100%

Pu

blic

Adm

inis

trat

ion

28

1

7

22

1

7

30

2

6

26

1

6

11

6

-6

0%

-62%

Re

al E

stat

e De

v &

Fina

nce

-

-

3

1

--

--

Urba

n Pl

anni

ng &

Law

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

3

3

3

4

4

4

3

1

1

7

100%

33

%

Urba

n Pl

anni

ng a

nd D

evel

opm

ent

10

1

3

11

1

3

9

14

6

1

0

3

2

-69%

-7

8%To

tal

5

1

41

5

5

47

6

1

49

4

3

32

3

1

28

-2

1%

-36%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h

Urba

n St

udie

s -

-

-

-

2

3

-

-

--

--

Ur

ban

Stud

ies

& Pu

blic

Affa

irs

2

2

-

3

-

-

2

1

1

1

-33%

-5

0%To

tal

2

2

-

3

2

3

2

1

1

1

-3

3%

-50%

T ota

l Urb

an A

ffairs

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e 4

6

32

7

4

49

5

2

44

5

7

48

7

4

53

21

%

63%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

51

4

1

55

4

7

61

4

9

43

3

2

31

2

8

-21%

-3

6%Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

2

2

-

3

2

3

2

1

1

1

-33%

-5

0%T o

tal

99

75

1

29

99

1

15

96

1

02

81

1

06

82

3%

8%

Note

: De

gree

s/Ce

rtific

ates

aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s

Tabl

e 5.

13: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- C

olle

ge o

f Urb

an A

ffai

rs


Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Degr

ee L

evel

M

ajor

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Post

Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

Mas

ter o

f Law

s -

-

1

1

2

2

2

1

2

3

67

%

--To

tal

-

-

1

1

2

2

2

1

2

3

67%

--

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

Le

gal S

tudi

es

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

--

--To

tal

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

--

--

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l

Juris

Doc

tor

74

1

16

76

9

7

63

9

2

66

8

9

49

6

1

-29%

-4

2%To

tal

7

4

116

7

6

97

6

3

92

6

6

89

4

9

61

-2

9%

-42%

Tota

l Law

Po

st M

aste

r’s C

ertifi

cate

-

-

1

1

2

2

2

1

2

3

67

%

--

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l 7

4

116

7

6

97

6

3

92

6

6

89

4

9

61

-2

9%

-42%

Tota

l

74

1

16

77

9

8

65

9

4

68

9

0

52

6

5

-26%

-3

8%

Note

: De

gree

s/Ce

rtific

ates

aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

Incl

udes

Alte

rnat

e De

gree

s

Tabl

e 5.

14: A

nnua

l Deg

rees

/Cer

tifi

cate

s A

war

ded

by M

ajor

and

Gen

der

- C

olle

ge o

f Law


Sec

tio

n

5

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

arRa

ce

Degr

ee L

evel

Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Blac

k/Af

rican

Am

eric

an

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e 2

47

80

2

50

102

2

58

99

2

49

113

2

30

104

-8

%

2%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

129

2

9

119

3

4

116

4

6

116

3

6

119

5

3

13%

9%

Po

st-M

aste

r’s C

ertifi

cate

5

1

6

-

1

-

2

1

2

-

-3

3%

-67%

Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

2

-

2

2

3

2

2

2

4

-

0%

100%

Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

7

5

10

8

5

4

8

8

6

3

-4

4%

-25%

Tota

l

390

1

15

387

1

46

383

1

51

377

1

60

361

1

60

-3%

3%

Hisp

anic

/Lat

ino

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e 3

4

26

5

2

24

5

1

21

6

8

25

7

6

30

14

%

77%

M

aste

r’s D

egre

e 1

6

9

21

1

0

18

1

7

18

1

3

27

1

2

26%

56

%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

1

1

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

--

--

Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

1

3

2

1

2

1

3

4

2

1

-57%

-2

5%To

tal

5

2

39

7

7

35

7

1

39

8

9

42

1

06

43

14

%

64%

Asia

n

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

36

2

1

31

2

9

30

2

7

30

2

8

33

2

3

-3%

-2

%

Mas

ter ’s

Deg

ree

14

1

8

22

2

0

27

2

0

14

1

6

16

2

1

23%

16

%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h -

-

-

1

-

-

2

-

1

-

-5

0%

--

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l 3

4

3

2

2

-

3

4

1

2

-5

7%

-57%

Tota

l

53

4

4

56

5

2

59

4

7

49

4

8

51

4

6

0%

0%Am

eric

an In

dian

/Ala

ska

Nativ

e

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

-

1

6

2

5

3

4

3

2

1

-57%

20

0%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

6

1

1

-

-

-

-

1

2

2

300%

-4

3%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

-

-

-100

%

--To

tal

6

2

8

2

5

3

5

5

4

3

-3

0%

-13%

Nativ

e Ha

wai

ian

or O

ther

Pac

ific

Isla

nd

Bach

elor

’s D

egre

e -

-

-

-

1

-

2

1

-

1

-6

7%

--

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

1

-

-

-100

%

--

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--To

tal

-

-

-

-

1

-

3

2

-

1

-8

0%

--

Tabl

e 5.

15: A

nnua

l Aw

ards

by

Ethn

icit

y an

d G

ende

r

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e


cont

inue

d fro

m p

revi

ous

page

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Race

De

gree

Lev

el

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Two

or M

ore

Race

s

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

9

3

5

3

10

7

2

3

13

2

9

17

28

%

283%

M

aste

r’s D

egre

e -

-

3

5

4

1

9

5

9

8

21

%

--

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

--

--

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l -

1

-

-

-

-

1

-

2

1

20

0%

200%

Tota

l

9

4

8

8

14

8

3

3

18

4

0

26

29

%

408%

Tota

l Min

ority

*

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

326

1

31

344

1

60

355

1

57

376

1

83

370

1

76

-2%

19

%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

165

5

7

166

6

9

165

8

4

158

7

2

173

9

6

17%

21

%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

6

3

9

-

1

-

2

1

2

-

-33%

-7

8%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h 2

-

2

3

3

2

4

2

6

-

0%

20

0%

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l 1

1

13

1

5

11

9

5

1

6

17

1

1

7

-45%

-2

5%To

tal

510

2

04

536

2

43

533

2

48

556

2

75

562

2

79

1%

18%

Non-

Resi

dent

Alie

n

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

20

2

2

22

2

9

22

2

9

25

4

8

29

6

0

22%

11

2%

Mas

ter ’s

Deg

ree

68

1

32

96

1

53

86

1

38

106

1

26

135

1

92

41%

64

%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

-

-

-

1

1

1

1

1

2

3

150%

--

Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

12

9

5

1

0

6

12

9

5

1

7

12

10

7%

38%

Do

ctor

al-P

rofe

ssio

nal

2

1

-

-

-

1

2

-

-

1

-50%

-6

7%To

tal

102

1

64

123

1

93

115

1

81

143

1

80

183

2

68

40%

70

%Un

know

n

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

60

5

4

69

5

8

55

6

5

38

4

5

47

4

5

11%

-1

9%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

76

4

8

77

4

7

61

3

9

56

3

0

35

1

2

-45%

-6

2%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

1

-

1

1

1

1

-

-

-

-

--

-100

%

Doct

oral

-Res

earc

h 2

-

2

1

-

-

1

-

2

-

10

0%

0%

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l 7

1

1

4

7

1

1

1

1

3

1

100%

-7

8%To

tal

1

46

113

1

53

114

1

18

106

9

6

76

8

7

58

-1

6%

-44%

Whi

te

Bac h

elor

’s D

egre

e 6

94

610

7

57

627

7

78

656

8

49

688

9

09

681

3%

22

%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

489

3

43

491

3

64

486

3

67

486

3

22

495

3

22

1%

-2%

Po

st-M

aste

r’s C

ertifi

cate

9

4

9

2

9

5

1

6

-

9

4

-19%

0%

Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

7

14

4

8

1

5

6

8

9

9

13

29

%

5%

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l 7

6

100

7

9

88

6

9

92

7

3

82

5

6

68

-2

0%

-30%

Tota

l

1,

275

1

,071

1

,340

1

,089

1

,357

1

,126

1

,432

1

,101

1

,478

1

,088

1%

9%

cont

inue

d on

nex

t pag

e

Tabl

e 5.

15: A

nnua

l Aw

ards

by

Ethn

icit

y an

d G

ende

r


Sec

tio

n

5

cont

inue

d fro

m p

revi

ous

page

Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

20

10-2

011

2011

-201

2 20

12-2

013

2013

-201

4 20

14-2

015

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Race

De

gree

Lev

el

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e Fe

mal

e M

ale

Fem

ale

Mal

e

Univ

ersi

ty T

otal

s

Ba

chel

or’s

Deg

ree

1,1

00

817

1

,192

8

74

1,2

10

907

1

,288

9

64

1,3

55

962

3%

21

%

Mas

ter’s

Deg

ree

798

5

80

830

6

33

798

6

28

806

5

50

838

6

22

8%

6%

Post

-Mas

ter’s

Cer

tifica

te

16

7

1

9

4

12

7

1

9

2

13

7

-5

%

-13%

Do

ctor

al-R

esea

rch

23

2

3

13

2

2

24

2

0

22

1

6

34

2

5

55%

28

%

Doct

oral

-Pro

fess

iona

l 9

6

125

9

8

106

7

9

99

9

2

100

7

0

77

-2

3%

-33%

Tota

l

2,0

33

1,5

52

2,1

52

1,6

39

2,1

23

1,6

61

2,2

27

1,6

32

2,3

10

1,6

93

4%

12%

Note

: De

gree

s/Ce

rtific

ates

aw

arde

d su

mm

er th

roug

h sp

ring.

*Tot

al M

inor

ity e

xclu

des

Whi

te, U

nkno

wn

and

Non-

Resi

dent

Alie

n.

Tabl

e 5.

15: A

nnua

l Aw

ards

by

Ethn

icit

y an

d G

ende

r

Sec

tio

n

6

Academic & Administrative Programs

6Book of Trends

Section 6 - Selected Strategic Indicators

Sec

tio

n

6

123

Honors ProgramJack, Joseph & Morton Mandel Honors College

New Enrollment by Cohort Year Percent Change

College 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-year 5-year

Business 7 4 8 7 4 -43% -69%CLASS 14 14 21 16 9 -44% -50%Education 1 2 0 2 0 -100% -100%Nursing 7 5 4 1 4 300% -Engineering 5 13 13 11 18 64% 29%Science 30 23 26 31 20 -35% -13%Urban Affairs 2 0 5 1 3 200% 50%Undergraduate Studies 2 0 0 0 3 - -Total1 68 61 77 69 61 -12% -14%

In Top 10% of High School Rank2 55% 91% 77% 94% 87% -7% 13%High School GPA 3.99 4.15 4.02 4.03 4.10 2% -3%ACT Composite 30 30 30 30 30 0% 3%SAT Composite3 1,943 1,930 1,922 1,983 1,932 -3% 6%

Major Features of the Honors Programn Enriched curriculum n Leadership development n Honors community and experiences

Table 6.1: Characteristics of New Honors Students - Fall 2011-2015

Table 6.2: Scholarship Aid for Honors Students by Financial Aid Year

Cleveland State University inaugurated its new Honors Program in Fall 2004 with a class of 40 highly motivated, academically talented first-year students. In 2014 the Program was reconstituted as the Jack, Joseph & Morton Mandel Honors College. There are currently approximately 250 students in the Honors Program.

Freshmen admitted to the program receive renewable scholarships covering tuition and academic fees. Most Juniors admitted to the program receive renewable scholarships of $5000 per academic year. Honors students accept the challenge of participating in intensive and specialized versions of general education classes, advanced curricula in their chosen majors, and are granted special consideration in several areas including preference in registration and extended university library borrowing privileges.

As juniors and seniors, Honors students focus on their majors. Upper division Honors students have the opportunity to do additional honors work under faculty supervision in established courses, enroll in graduate courses, participate in a faculty member’s research project or laboratory, do an independent research project, a service learning project, and/or an internship, job, or engage in a co-op experience. The specific program depends on the student’s major.

First year students admitted in Fall 2014 were chosen from among applicants who were in the top 10% of their high school class or had a composite ACT score of at least 30. The Program also has an Upper-Division admission pathway for transfer students or rising CSU juniors with a GPA in college coursework of at least 3.5.

Honor student data reported in this table are provided by the Jack, Joseph & Morton Mandel Honors College.Cohort Year includes newly admitted students in both lower and upper levels.High School ranking, GPA, ACT and SAT scores reported are for “active” and “lower level” students only.1 Total is not the sum of the students due to “dual” majors.2 For cohort year 2008, although top 10% HS ranking is indicated as 55% there were 10 students who came from schools that do not rank their students. For Cohort 2011, 17 students came from Schools that do not rank their students. For Cohort 2012, 8 students came from schools that do not rank. For cohort year 2013, although top 10% HS ranking is indicated as 77% there were 15 students who came

from schools that do not rank their students .For cohort year 2014, although top 10% HS ranking is indicated as 94% there were 8 students who came from schools that do not rank their students. For cohort year 2015, although top 10% HS ranking is indicated as 87% there were 9 students who came from schools that do not rank their students.3 SAT Composite score are the sum of “Math & Verbal” for years 2005 to 2007, for subsequent years, all three components (Math, Verbal, & Writing) are included. Not all students report SAT scores.4 Starting in 2014 some upper divison honors students were admitted without scholarship, thus more students were admitted then in previous years. In 2014there were 9 upper divison students were admitted without scholarship. In 2015 there were 2 upper divison students admitted without scholarship.

Financial Aid Year

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16Type of Financial Aid Enrollment Total Average Enrollment Total Average Enrollment Total Average

Need Based Tuition 89 $827,461 $9,297 77 $658,343 $8,550 74 $627,237 $8,476Merit Based Tuition 115 $1,196,001 $10,400 118 $1,151,753 $9,761 120 $1,082,920 $9,024Books 93 $66,400 $714 29 $23,200 $800 0 $0 On-Campus Housing 40 $83,666 $2,092 53 $107,636 $2,031 19 $36,000 $1,895Total 204 $2,173,528 $10,655 195 $1,940,932 $9,953 194 $1,746,157 $9,001Source: Cleveland State University Financial Aid Office


Tabl

e 6.

3: I

PED

S C

ohor

t C

hara

cter

isti

cs

US D

epar

tmen

t of E

duca

tion,

Inte

grat

ed P

osts

econ

dary

Edu

catio

n Da

ta S

yste

m (I

PEDS

) Fre

shm

en C

ohor

t Defi

nitio

n:

1) A

stu

dent

atte

ndin

g an

y in

stitu

tion

of h

ighe

r lea

rnin

g fo

r the

firs

t tim

e at

the

unde

rgra

duat

e le

vel,

incl

udes

stu

dent

s en

rolle

d in

the

fall

term

who

atte

nded

col

lege

for t

he fi

rst t

ime

in th

e pr

ior

sum

mer

term

, als

o in

clud

es s

tude

nts

who

ent

ered

CSU

with

adv

ance

d st

andi

ng (c

olle

ge c

redi

ts e

arne

d be

fore

gra

duat

ion

from

hig

h sc

hool

). 2)

By

the

unive

rsity

cen

sus

date

, the

stu

dent

has

re

gist

ered

for 1

2 or

mor

e cr

edit

hour

s in

the

fall

sem

este

r. 3)

The

stu

dent

is s

eeki

ng a

bac

cala

urea

te d

egre

e.

Tabl

e 6.

3a: A

vera

ge A

CT

Com

posi

te S

core

s by

Col

lege

for

IPED

S C

ohor

t St

uden

ts

Un

derg

radu

ate

Urba

n

To

tal

% o

f Coh

ort

Coho

rt

Bu

sine

ss

CLAS

S Ed

ucat

ion

Engi

neer

ing

Nurs

ing

Scie

nce

Stud

ies

Affa

irs

Univ

ersi

ty

Coho

rt

with

ACT

/SAT

Fall

2011

To

tal S

tude

nts

130

451

87

139

80

302

66

10

1,26

5 1,

328

95%

Av

erag

e 21

.2

21.5

20

.4

23.5

22

.2

22.3

18

.3

22.5

21

.7

Fall

2012

To

tal S

tude

nts

175

435

66

188

116

386

105

8 1,

479

1,53

1 97

%

Av

erag

e 21

.4

21.6

20

.8

23.9

22

.1

22.2

18

.6

23.8

21

.8

Fall

2013

To

tal S

tude

nts

221

504

95

185

134

409

100

8 1,

656

1,72

9 96

%

Av

erag

e 22

.0

21.6

20

.3

24.0

22

.1

22.1

18

.8

22.9

21

.9

Fall

2014

To

tal S

tude

nts

215

425

51

196

120

352

130

12

1,50

1 1,

562

96%

Av

erag

e 21

.7

21.9

19

.6

23.9

21

.7

22.4

19

.7

19.3

21

.9

Fall

2015

To

tal S

tude

nts

225

287

84

271

141

443

334

6 1,

791

1,84

7 97

%

Av

erag

e 22

.0

22.0

20

.4

23.9

22

.2

22.3

20

.9

24.8

22

.1

Note

: The

ave

rage

ACT

Com

posi

te s

core

repo

rted

is c

alcu

late

d us

ing

whi

chev

er is

the

high

est o

f eac

h st

uden

t’s A

CT, I

ACT,

or c

onve

rted

SAT

scor

es (V

erba

l + M

ath

scor

es o

nly

conv

erte

d).

Fall

2013

con

verte

d SA

T sc

ores

are

cal

cula

ted

with

new

con

vers

ion

tabl

e pr

ovid

ed b

y th

e Ad

mis

sion

s Of

fice.


Sec

tio

n

6

125

Table 6.3b: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Gender, 5 Year Trend

Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015

Gender N % N % N % N % N %

Female 742 56% 853 56% 971 56% 831 53% 996 54%Male 586 44% 678 44% 758 44% 731 47% 851 46%COHORT 1,328 100% 1,531 100% 1,729 100% 1,562 100% 1,847 100%

Table 6.3c: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Ethnicity, 5 Year Trend

Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015

Ethnicity N % N % N % N % N %

White 861 65% 973 64% 1114 64% 1018 65% 1210 66% African American 266 20% 291 19% 301 17% 243 16% 265 14% Hispanic 62 5% 91 6% 106 6% 95 6% 118 6% Asian 28 2% 49 3% 48 3% 47 3% 59 3% Native Hawaiian/Other 0 0% 2 0% 2 0% 2 0% 2 0% Pacific Islander Native American 1 0% 5 0% 5 0% 2 0% 3 0% Two or More Races 64 5% 65 4% 70 4% 73 5% 83 4%Minority Total 421 32% 503 33% 532 31% 462 30% 530 29%Non-Resident Alien 23 2% 33 2% 62 4% 61 4% 71 4%Unknown 23 2% 22 1% 21 1% 21 1% 36 2%COHORT 1,328 100% 1,531 100% 1,729 100% 1,562 100% 1,847 100%

Table 6.3d: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Age Group, 5 Year Trend Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015

Age N % N % N % N % N %

Under 18 67 5% 90 6% 103 6% 77 5% 104 6%18-19 1,162 88% 1,372 90% 1,529 88% 1,414 91% 1,690 91%20-21 33 2% 21 1% 42 2% 33 2% 26 1%22-24 27 2% 16 1% 27 2% 21 1% 18 1%25-29 20 2% 19 1% 18 1% 10 1% 6 0%30 and above 19 1% 13 1% 10 1% 7 0% 3 0%COHORT 1,328 100% 1,531 100% 1,729 100% 1,562 100% 1,847 100%

Table 6.3e: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Selected Major, 5 Year Trend Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015

Academic Major Type N % N % N % N % N %

Major Selected 716 54% 839 55% 981 57% 971 62% 1,076 58%

“Pre” Major 379 29% 474 31% 507 29% 312 20% 390 21%

Major Undeclared 233 18% 218 14% 241 14% 279 18% 381 21%COHORT 1,328 100% 1,531 100% 1,729 100% 1,562 100% 1,847 100%

Table 6.3f: Fall IPEDS Cohort by Notable Student Groups, 5 Year Trend Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015

Student Groups N % N % N % N % N %

Living in 523 39% 568 37% 586 34% 481 31% 544 29% University Housing Honors 40 3% 41 3% 44 3% 39 2% 38 2%Ohio Resident 1,226 92% 1,397 91% 1,569 91% 1,422 91% 1,670 90%Pell Grant Recipient 685 52% 797 52% 852 49% 713 46% 839 45%Taking Developmental Class 424 32% 417 27% 463 27% 409 26% 420 23%COHORT 1,328 1,531 1,729 1,562 1,847 Note: Groups are not exclusive; for instance, a single student might be an Ohio Resident, Living in University Housing and be in Honors.


Tabl

e 6.

4: A

vera

ge H

igh

Scho

ol G

PA b

y C

olle

ge fo

r IP

EDS

Coh

ort

Stud

ents

, 5 Y

ear T

rend

Un

derg

radu

ate

Urba

n

To

tal

% o

f Coh

ort

Coho

rt

Bu

sine

ss

CLAS

S Ed

ucat

ion

Engi

neer

ing

Nurs

ing

Scie

nce

Stud

ies

Affa

irs

Univ

ersi

ty

Coho

rt

with

HS

GPA

Fall

2011

To

tal S

tude

nts

134

456

89

146

82

309

75

11

1,30

2 1,

328

98%

Av

erag

e 3.

13

3.14

3.

08

3.35

3.

48

3.33

2.

59

3.05

3.

19

Fall

2012

To

tal S

tude

nts

181

439

67

201

116

389

106

9 1,

508

1,53

1 98

%

Av

erag

e 3.

10

3.14

3.

22

3.45

3.

45

3.29

2.

65

3.37

3.

21

Fall

2013

To

tal S

tude

nts

237

508

95

213

135

410

100

8 1,

706

1,72

9 99

%

Av

erag

e 3.

14

3.20

3.

00

3.45

3.

50

3.34

2.

58

3.22

3.

23

Fall

2014

To

tal S

tude

nts

227

427

54

222

121

354

135

12

1,55

2 1,

562

99%

Av

erag

e 3.

18

3.21

2.

97

3.39

3.

57

3.37

2.

80

2.98

3.

25

Fall

2015

To

tal S

tude

nts

240

290

86

295

141

448

334

8 1,

842

1,84

7 10

0%

Av

erag

e 3.

20

3.24

3.

13

3.40

3.

54

3.44

3.

06

3.46

3.

29

Note

: Hig

h Sc

hool

GPA

s be

twee

n ‘g

reat

er th

an 0

’ and

‘les

s or

equ

al to

5.0

’ wer

e us

ed to

cal

cula

te th

e av

erag

e. G

EDs

wer

e ex

clud

ed.


Sec

tio

n

6

127

Fall Cumulative Average GPA

College 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Business 2.74 2.78 2.82 2.86 2.88

CLASS 2.86 2.88 2.90 2.90 2.93

Education 3.08 3.13 3.10 3.13 3.13

Engineering 2.90 2.88 2.89 2.95 2.91

Nursing 3.34 3.38 3.32 3.30 3.34

Science 2.99 3.00 3.03 3.05 3.05

Urban Affairs 3.05 3.06 3.06 3.06 3.05

Undergraduate Studies 2.75 2.79 2.86 2.77 2.71

Undergraduate Non-Degree 3.22 3.35 3.34 3.34 3.36

University Average 2.92 2.94 2.96 2.97 2.97Source: Institutional Research

Table 6.5: Undergraduate Cumulative GPA by College: 5-Year Trend


Table 6.6a: Fall 2015 Top 15 Majors by Academic Level

Undergraduate: Graduate (excluding Law):Description Total Description Total

Psychology-PSY 547 Business Administration-MBA 497

Biology-BIO 483 Electrical Engineering-ELG 278

General Business-BADM 445 Social Work-GSW 246

Mechanical Engineering-MCE 398 Financial Accounting_Audit-ACCAUDIT 141

Accounting-ACT 380 Master of Occupational Therapy-MOT 133

Health Sciences-HSCBS 338 Graduate Education Licensure-EDUC-LIC 116

Criminology-CRIM 312 Clinical Mental Health Counseling-CAC 115

Marketing-MKT 265 Doctor of Physical Therapy-DPT 105

Finance-FIN 264 Health Science- Phy. A. Track-GHE-PA 93

Early Childhood Education-ECE 204 Adult Learning and Development-ALD 92

Film, TV and Interactive Media-FILM/DGTAL 199 Mechanical Engineering-MCG 89

Chemical Engineering-CHE 191 Computer and Information Science-GCS 80

Nursing, BSN/RN-NUB 187 C&I-Mild / Moderate-C&IMM 75

Social Work-SWK 183 Public Administration-MPA 65

Communication-COM 181 Clinical Bioanalytical Chem-CBC 63

Table 6.6b: Fall 2015 Top 15 Departments by Academic Level

Undergraduate: Graduate (excluding Law):Description Total Description Total

Health Sciences 901 Business Administration 531

Biology, Geology & Environmental Science 724 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 431

Psychology 673 Teacher Education 419

Communication 625 Health Sciences 389

Criminology, Anthropology, and Sociology 558 CASAL 316

Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 558 Social Work 246

Business Administration 531 Urban Studies 189

Teacher Education 461 Accounting 174

Urban Studies 441 Health And Physical Education 112

Mechanical Engineering 425 Mechanical Engineering 100

Accounting 413 Psychology 99

Nursing 319 Doctoral 94

Finance 272 Chemical & Biomedical Engineering 89

Marketing 271 Chemistry 88

Chemical & Biomedical Engineering 216 Civil & Environmental Engineering 76


Sec

tio

n

6

129

Tota

l M

inor

ity a

s a

% o

f

To

tal

Min

ority

as

a %

of

M

inor

ity

Maj

or

Tota

l Maj

or

M

inor

ity

Maj

or

Tota

l Maj

or

Maj

or/P

rogr

am

Enro

llmen

t En

rollm

ent

Enro

llmen

t M

ajor

/Pro

gram

En

rollm

ent

Enro

llmen

t En

rollm

ent

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip-

ORL

20

31

65%

A

dult

Lear

ning

and

Dev

elop

men

t-AL

D 56

92

61

%So

cial

Wor

k-SW

K 10

4 18

3 57

%

Soc

ial W

ork-

GSW

12

3 24

6 50

%Ur

ban

Stud

ies

- Pu

blic

Mgm

t-US

T 21

37

57

%

Hea

lth S

cien

ce-G

HE

16

35

46%

Soci

olog

y-SO

C 72

12

8 56

%

Clin

ical

Men

tal H

ealth

Cns

ling-

CAC

52

115

45%

Span

ish-

SPN

20

39

51%

E

duca

tiona

l Adm

inis

trat

ion-

EAD

16

39

41%

Com

mun

icat

ion

Man

agem

ent-

COM

M M

GT

24

48

50%

E

xecu

tive

Busi

ness

Adm

in-E

BA

11

27

41%

Urba

n St

udie

s -

Regi

onal

Pln

g-US

TRPL

17

37

46

%

C&I

-Ear

ly C

hild

hood

Edu

c-C&

IECE

21

56

38

%St

udio

Art

-ART

STU

DIO

26

57

46%

C

&I-M

ild /

Mod

erat

e-C&

IMM

28

75

37

%Or

gani

zatio

nal L

eade

rshi

p M

gmt-

ORL

MGM

T 22

50

44

%

Tax

Prog

ram

-TAX

ATIO

N 12

33

36

%Li

bera

l Stu

dies

-LIB

13

30

43

%

C&I

-Lite

racy

Dev

-Rea

ding

-C&I

LITR

DG

16

46

35%

Nonp

rofit

Adm

inis

trat

ion-

NAD

31

73

42%

S

port

Man

agem

ent-

GSM

10

29

34

%Ch

emis

try-

CHM

PP

22

52

42%

P

ublic

Adm

inis

trat

ion-

MPA

22

65

34

%Cr

imin

olog

y-CR

IM

131

312

42%

La

bor R

elat

ions

and

Hum

a-GL

R 9

27

33%

Heal

th S

cien

ces-

HSCB

S-PB

29

70

41

%

Gra

duat

e Ed

ucat

ion

Lice

nsur

e-ED

UC-L

IC

34

116

29%

Heal

th S

cien

ces-

HSCB

S 13

4 33

8 40

%

Cou

nsel

or E

duca

tion-

CNS

16

55

29%

Note

s: O

nly

incl

udes

thos

e m

ajor

s w

ith m

ore

than

25

tota

l enr

ollm

ent.

M

inor

ity: A

ll ra

ces

excl

udin

g W

hite

, Unk

now

n an

d No

n-Re

side

nt A

lien.

Tabl

e 6.

7: F

all 2

015

Top

15 D

egre

e Se

ekin

g Pr

ogra

ms

with

Hig

hest

Min

ority

Stu

dent

Enr

ollm

ent b

y A

cade

mic

Lev

el Un

derg

radu

ate:

Gr

adua

te (e

xclu

ding

LAW

):

Tota

l M

inor

ity a

s a

% o

f

M

inor

ity

Maj

or

Tota

l Maj

or

M

ajor

/Pro

gram

En

rollm

ent

Enro

llmen

t En

rollm

ent

Pre-

Soci

al W

ork-

PSW

K 75

13

9 54

%Co

llege

Cre

dit P

lus-

PSEO

P 11

7 22

2 53

%Pr

e-Li

bera

l Art

s &

Soci

al S

ci-P

LASS

12

28

43

%Pr

e-M

edic

ine-

PREM

ED

138

334

41%

Pre-

Educ

& H

uman

Ser

v (E

duc)

-PEH

SE

32

79

41%

Pre-

Med

icin

e-PR

EMED

PB

21

55

38%

Pre-

Educ

atio

n-PE

DU

44

134

33%

Pre-

Heal

thSc

ienc

e/Ph

ysTh

pyPr

ep-P

RETH

P 11

34

32

%Pr

e-Ve

terin

ary

Med

icin

e-PR

EVET

10

32

31

%Pr

e-Bu

sine

ss A

dmin

istr

atio

n-PB

USUS

8

26

31%

Note

s: O

nly

incl

udes

thos

e m

ajor

s w

ith m

ore

than

25

tota

l enr

ollm

ent.

Min

ority

: All

race

s ex

clud

ing

Whi

te, U

nkno

wn

and

Non-

Resi

dent

Alie

n.

Top

10 U

nder

grad

uate

Deg

ree-

Seek

ing

(Pre

-Maj

ors/

Pro

gram

s)


Tota

l Fe

mal

e as

a %

of

Tota

l Fe

mal

e as

a %

of

Fe

mal

e M

ajor

To

tal M

ajor

Fem

ale

Maj

or

Tota

l Maj

or

Maj

or/P

rogr

am

Enro

llmen

t En

rollm

ent

Enro

llmen

t M

ajor

/Pro

gram

En

rollm

ent

Enro

llmen

t En

rollm

ent

Early

Chi

ldho

od E

duca

tion-

ECE

192

204

94%

N

ursi

ng-G

NR

40

41

98%

Spee

ch &

Hea

ring-

SPH

90

97

93%

S

peec

h Pa

thol

ogy

and

Aud-

GSP

57

59

97%

Nurs

ing,

BSN

/RN-

NUB

167

187

89%

C

&I-L

itera

cy D

ev-R

eadi

ng-C

&ILI

TRDG

43

46

93

%No

npro

fit A

dmin

istr

atio

n-NA

D 63

73

86

%

C&I

-Ear

ly C

hild

hood

Edu

c-C&

IECE

52

56

93

%He

alth

Sci

ence

Pre

-Occ

Thr

py-H

STHO

99

11

7 85

%

Mas

ter o

f Occ

upat

iona

l The

rapy

-MOT

12

0 13

3 90

%So

cial

Wor

k-SW

K 15

0 18

3 82

%

Cou

nsel

or E

duca

tion-

CNS

49

55

89%

Anth

ropo

logy

-ANT

54

67

81

%

Labo

r Rel

atio

ns a

nd H

uma-

GLR

24

27

89%

Mod

erat

e/In

tens

ive

Educ

’lNee

ds-S

EDM

I 24

30

80

%

Soc

ial W

ork-

GSW

20

3 24

6 83

%Ps

ycho

logy

-PSY

LR

56

70

80%

C

linic

al M

enta

l Hea

lth C

nslin

g-CA

C 94

11

5 82

%M

ild/M

oder

ate

Educ

atio

nal N

eed-

SEDM

M

67

84

80%

A

dult

Lear

ning

and

Dev

elop

men

t-AL

D 75

92

82

%En

glis

h-Cr

eativ

e W

ritin

g Tr

ack-

ENGC

W

31

39

79%

G

radu

ate

Educ

atio

n Li

cens

ure-

EDUC

-LIC

92

11

6 79

%M

usic

The

rapy

-MUS

THP

Y 44

56

79

%

Hea

lth S

cien

ce-G

HE

27

35

77%

Orga

niza

tiona

l Lea

ders

hip-

ORL

24

31

77%

E

duca

tiona

l Adm

inis

trat

ion-

EAD

30

39

77%

Nurs

ing,

BSN

-NUB

APB

54

70

77%

H

ealth

Sci

ence

- Ph

y. A

. Tra

ck-G

HE-P

A 71

93

76

%M

id C

hild

hood

Mat

h &

Scie

nce-

EDM

MTS

C 20

26

77

%

C&I

-Edu

catio

nal T

echn

olog

y-C&

IETE

23

32

72

%

Note

s: O

nly

inclu

des

maj

ors

with

mor

e th

an 2

5 to

tal e

nrol

lmen

t

Min

ority

: All r

aces

exc

ludi

ng W

hite

, Unk

now

n an

d No

n-Re

siden

t Alie

n

Unde

rgra

duat

e:

Grad

uate

(exc

ludi

ng L

AW):

Tota

l Fe

mal

e as

a %

of

Fem

ale

Maj

or

Tota

l Maj

or

Maj

or/P

rogr

am

Enro

llmen

t En

rollm

ent

Enro

llmen

t

Pre-

Vete

rinar

y M

edic

ine-

PREV

ET

32

32

100%

Prep

arat

ory

Nurs

ing-

PSNU

R 18

2 20

6 88

%Pr

e-So

cial

Wor

k-PS

WK

114

139

82%

Pre-

Dent

istr

y-PR

EDEN

T 32

44

73

%Pr

e-Ph

arm

acy-

PREP

HAR

39

54

72%

Pre-

Educ

atio

n-PE

DU

96

134

72%

Pre-

Med

icin

e-PR

EMED

22

5 33

4 67

%Pr

e-M

edic

ine-

PREM

EDPB

33

55

60

%Pr

e-Ed

uc &

Hum

an S

erv

(Edu

c)-P

EHSE

45

79

57

%Pr

e-He

alth

Scie

nce/

Phys

Thpy

Prep

-PRE

THP

18

34

53%

Note

s: O

nly

inclu

des

maj

ors

with

mor

e th

an 2

5 to

tal e

nrol

lmen

t

Min

ority

: All r

aces

exc

ludi

ng W

hite

, Unk

now

n an

d No

n-Re

siden

t Alie

n

Top

10 U

nder

grad

uate

Deg

ree

Seek

ing

(Pre

-Maj

ors/

Prog

ram

s)

Tabl

e 6.

8: F

all 2

015

Top

15 D

egre

e Se

ekin

g Pr

ogra

ms

wit

h H

ighe

st F

emal

e St

uden

t En

rollm

ent

by A

cade

mic

Lev

el


Sec

tio

n

6

131

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1-

Year

5-

Year

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Busi

ness

Day

41

17

42

14

36

16

31

17

38

15

23%

-8

%

-7%

-1

1%Ev

enin

g 93

19

92

19

88

19

81

18

82

16

1%

-1

3%

-12%

-1

7%Ot

her

31

25

37

23

34

21

49

23

46

24

-6%

3%

48

%

-5%

Tota

l 16

5 20

17

1 19

15

8 19

16

1 19

16

6 18

3%

-8

%

1%

-9%

CL

ASS

Da

y 53

23

41

20

46

19

36

20

36

18

0%

-9

%

-32%

-2

2%Ev

enin

g 19

20

21

20

24

16

21

16

23

15

10

%

-5%

21

%

-25%

Othe

r 55

23

64

23

53

24

56

25

64

21

14

%

-16%

16

%

-10%

Tota

l 12

7 23

12

6 22

12

3 21

11

3 21

12

3 19

9%

-1

2%

-3%

-1

6%

Educ

atio

n

Day

22

19

25

15

20

14

18

13

17

15

-6%

12

%

-23%

-2

4%Ev

enin

g 50

15

47

14

39

15

39

11

46

13

18

%

13%

-8

%

-17%

Othe

r 80

19

83

18

90

16

80

17

80

15

0%

-1

6%

0%

-22%

To

tal

152

18

155

16

149

15

137

15

143

14

4%

-7%

-6

%

-21%

Engi

neer

ing

Da

y 3

14

5 23

5

24

6 24

6

24

0%

2%

100%

77

%Ev

enin

g 2

32

5 29

4

33

4 31

7

27

75%

-1

2%

250%

-1

4%Ot

her

1 5

1 33

-

560%

-

-To

tal

5 21

10

26

9

28

11

25

14

26

27%

7%

18

0%

26%

Law

Da

y 3

25

5 25

6

8 5

16

6 14

20

%

-14%

10

0%

-44%

Even

ing

8 18

7

15

9 14

8

10

9 13

13

%

28%

13

%

-31%

Othe

r 3

25

2 24

2

15

6 11

2

13

-67%

15

%

-33%

-4

9%To

tal

14

21

14

20

17

12

19

12

17

13

-11%

10

%

21%

-3

8%Nu

rsin

g

Day

2 68

3

64

3 65

3

65

4 52

33

%

-20%

10

0%

-23%

Othe

r 8

19

4 13

6

12

6 11

5

12

-17%

13

%

-38%

-3

5%To

tal

10

29

7 35

9

30

9 29

9

30

0%

3%

-10%

5%

Othe

r

Day

22

17

25

15

42

12

41

12

36

12

-12%

0%

64

%

-33%

Othe

r 2

26

1 21

1

39

1 29

1

25

0%

-14%

-5

0%

-4%

Tota

l 24

18

26

15

43

13

42

12

37

12

-1

2%

0%

54%

-3

3%

Tabl

e 6.

9: S

umm

er C

lass

Sec

tion

and

Ave

rage

Cla

ss S

ize

by T

ime

of D

ay a

nd C

olle

ge: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

(con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)


Tabl

e 6.

9: S

umm

er C

lass

Sec

tion

and

Ave

rage

Cla

ss S

ize

by T

ime

of D

ay a

nd C

olle

ge: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1-

Year

5-

Year

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Scie

nce

Da

y 79

26

82

24

76

24

82

20

10

8 19

32

%

-7%

37

%

-30%

Even

ing

15

16

15

17

13

17

17

15

10

11

-41%

-3

2%

-33%

-3

6%Ot

her

38

21

42

22

58

20

56

19

55

20

-2%

3%

45

%

-4%

Tota

l 13

2 24

13

9 22

14

7 22

15

5 19

17

3 18

12

%

-4%

31

%

-22%

Ur

ban

Affa

irs

Ev

enin

g 11

19

11

13

11

11

11

13

14

12

27

%

-6%

27

%

-38%

Othe

r 20

35

23

25

22

27

21

25

20

25

-5

%

1%

0%

-29%

Tota

l 31

29

34

21

33

21

32

21

34

20

6%

-5

%

10%

-3

4%

Univ

ersi

ty T

otal

Day

225

23

228

20

234

19

222

18

251

17

13%

-6

%

12%

-2

6%Ev

enin

g 19

8 18

19

8 17

18

8 17

18

1 16

19

1 15

6%

-6

%

-4%

-1

7%Ot

her

237

22

256

21

266

20

276

20

274

19

-1%

-5

%

16%

-1

4%

Tota

l 66

0 21

68

2 20

68

8 19

67

9 18

71

6 17

5%

-6

%

8%

-19%

Note

s: T

his

tabl

e on

ly re

flect

s le

ctur

e, s

emin

ar a

nd s

tudi

o co

urse

s w

ith 5

or m

ore

stud

ents

enr

olle

d.

*‘Ot

her’

incl

udes

wee

kend

s (F

riday

afte

r 4pm

, Sat

urda

y an

d Su

nday

) and

sec

tions

with

no

clas

s tim

e. C

ross

list

ed c

ours

es a

re c

ount

ed o

nce

only.

Day,

Even

ing

and

Wee

kend

s ar

e de

term

ined

by

mee

ting

time.

Som

e w

eb c

ours

es m

ay b

e in

clud

ed d

ue to

ava

ilabl

e m

eetin

g tim

e.

Day:

Mon

day

– Fr

iday

7 a

m to

4 p

m.

Even

ing:

Mon

day

– Th

ursd

ay 4

pm

to 1

2 am

.

(con

tinue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age)


Sec

tio

n

6

133

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1-

Year

5-

Year

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Busi

ness

Day

96

33

87

33

87

34

98

34

101

36

3%

7%

5%

11%

Even

ing

159

24

157

24

152

25

152

25

119

24

-22%

-2

%

-25%

0%

Othe

r 46

30

59

25

58

28

58

29

66

28

14

%

-5%

43

%

-9%

Tota

l 30

1 28

30

3 27

29

7 28

30

8 28

28

6 29

-7

%

3%

-5%

5%

CL

ASS

Da

y 33

6 30

35

4 30

38

6 29

39

5 32

39

9 30

1%

-4

%

19%

0%

Even

ing

150

23

141

25

129

25

153

22

146

24

-5%

11

%

-3%

7%

Othe

r 60

22

53

25

51

25

54

24

61

24

13

%

2%

2%

9%

Tota

l 54

6 28

54

8 28

56

6 28

60

2 28

60

6 28

1%

-1

%

11%

3%

Ed

ucat

ion

Da

y 52

22

44

23

41

24

50

21

87

18

74

%

-11%

67

%

-15%

Even

ing

101

21

101

20

106

19

98

17

98

17

0%

-3%

-3

%

-20%

Othe

r 78

21

88

20

98

20

91

21

99

20

9%

-2

%

27%

-1

%To

tal

231

21

233

21

245

20

239

19

284

19

19%

-5

%

23%

-1

2%En

gine

erin

g

Day

41

30

43

29

45

32

70

31

85

35

21%

11

%

107%

17

%Ev

enin

g 65

21

64

21

69

23

59

29

82

31

39

%

8%

26%

48

%Ot

her

13

11

5 15

1

54

2 49

3

6 50

%

-88%

-7

7%

-46%

To

tal

119

23

11

2 24

11

5 27

13

1 31

17

0 33

30

%

7%

43%

42

%

Hono

rs

Da

y 9

15

8 17

8

21

10

14

7 18

-3

0%

23%

-2

2%

15%

Othe

r 3

18

4 13

2

18

4 15

5

13

25%

-1

3%

67%

-2

8%To

tal

12

16

12

15

10

20

14

15

12

16

-14%

8%

0%

-2

%

Law

Da

y 50

29

42

28

40

28

39

26

36

27

-8

%

1%

-28%

-9

%Ev

enin

g 41

20

41

20

41

15

38

16

32

17

-1

6%

10%

-2

2%

-14%

Othe

r 4

14

6 16

4

12

2 12

3

23

50%

89

%

-25%

68

%

Tota

l 95

25

89

23

85

21

79

21

71

22

-1

0%

6%

-25%

-1

0%Nu

rsin

g

Day

14

67

13

73

14

69

13

70

14

68

8%

-3%

0%

2%

Even

ing

- -

- -

- -

- -

1 22

-

- -

-Ot

her

13

16

13

17

12

17

12

16

10

22

-17%

38

%

-23%

45

%%

To

tal

27

42

26

45

26

45

25

44

25

48

0%

8%

-7%

14

%

Tabl

e 6.

10:

Fall

Sect

ion

Enro

llmen

t by

Tim

e of

Day

and

Col

lege

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

(con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)


Tabl

e 6.

10:

Fall

Sect

ion

Enro

llmen

t by

Tim

e of

Day

and

Col

lege

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1-

Year

5-

Year

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Othe

r

Day

51

17

49

18

45

16

48

14

3 13

-9

4%

-7%

-9

4%

-23%

Even

ing

1 25

10

16

5

16

8 15

-

- -1

00%

-1

00%

-

-Ot

her

3 31

3

33

3 33

3

32

2 49

-3

3%

52%

-3

3%

58%

Tota

l 55

18

62

18

53

17

59

15

5

27

-92%

80

%

-91%

51

%

Scie

nce

Da

y 20

3 45

22

2 44

23

4 44

25

2 43

26

6 44

6%

2%

31

%

-4%

Even

ing

82

30

89

32

84

33

93

30

95

30

2%

-2%

16

%

-2%

Othe

r 53

27

53

29

58

29

72

25

79

26

10

%

2%

49%

-3

%

Tota

l 33

8 39

36

4 39

37

6 40

41

7 37

44

0 37

6%

1%

30

%

-4%

Unde

rgra

duat

e St

udie

s

Day

46

25

53

25

60

25

59

23

54

26

-8%

13

%

17%

4%

Even

ing

3 18

2

23

5 19

5

15

5 22

0%

47

%

67%

20

%Ot

her

- -

2 20

2

13

1 10

-

- -1

00%

-1

00%

-

-

Tota

l 49

24

57

25

67

24

65

22

59

25

-9

%

16%

20

%

5%

Urba

n Af

fairs

Day

12

39

13

37

10

46

11

43

11

46

0%

9%

-8%

20

%Ev

enin

g 50

20

52

18

48

19

50

18

49

20

-2

%

12%

-2

%

3%Ot

her

28

45

25

45

27

41

34

38

34

36

0%

-5%

21

%

-19%

To

tal

90

30

90

28

85

29

95

28

94

29

-1%

4%

4%

-3

%

Univ

ersi

ty T

otal

Day

910

33

928

33

970

33

1045

33

10

63

34

2%

3%

17%

3%

Even

ing

652

23

657

24

639

24

656

23

627

24

-4%

4%

-4

%

4%Ot

her

301

25

311

25

316

26

333

25

362

25

9%

0%

20%

0%

To

tal

1,86

3 28

1,

896

28

1,92

5 29

2,

034

28

2,05

2 29

1%

4%

10

%

4%

Note

s: T

his

tabl

e on

ly re

flect

s le

ctur

e, s

emin

ar a

nd s

tudi

o co

urse

s w

ith 5

or m

ore

stud

ents

enr

olle

d.

*Oth

er in

clud

es w

eeke

nds

(Frid

ay a

fter 4

pm

, Sat

urda

y an

d Su

nday

) and

sec

tions

with

no

clas

s tim

e. C

ross

list

ed c

ours

es a

re c

ount

ed o

nce

only.

Day,

Even

ing

and

Wee

kend

cou

rses

are

det

erm

ined

by

mee

ting

time.

Som

e w

eb c

ours

es m

ay b

e in

clud

ed d

ue to

ava

ilabl

e m

eetin

g tim

e.

Day:

Mon

day

– Fr

iday

7 a

m to

4 p

m.

Even

ing:

Mon

day

– Th

ursd

ay 4

pm

to 1

2 am

.

(con

tinue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age)


Sec

tio

n

6

135

Per

cent

Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2016

1-

Year

5-

Year

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Busi

ness

Day

87

32

82

34

83

34

94

35

86

37

-9%

7%

-1

%

15%

Even

ing

158

23

152

25

143

25

146

24

125

24

-14%

1%

-2

1%

6%Ot

her

47

27

51

25

51

29

56

30

71

28

27%

-7

%

51%

4%

Tota

l 29

2 26

28

5 28

27

7 29

29

6 29

28

2 29

-5

%

2%

-3%

11

%

CLAS

S

Day

308

30

329

30

343

30

350

30

371

30

6%

1%

20%

-1

%Ev

enin

g 13

3 22

13

5 24

12

9 23

14

8 24

14

6 24

-1

%

0%

10%

6%

Othe

r 53

25

61

25

60

24

59

26

59

26

0%

-1

%

11%

1%

To

tal

494

28

525

28

532

28

557

28

576

28

3%

1%

17%

1%

Ed

ucat

ion

Da

y 57

20

48

22

43

23

46

20

83

17

80

%

-14%

46

%

-15%

Even

ing

102

19

107

19

98

18

91

19

89

17

-2%

-7

%

-13%

-1

0%Ot

her

80

21

85

21

94

20

103

19

105

20

2%

5%

31%

-5

%To

tal

239

20

240

20

235

20

240

19

277

18

15%

-4

%

16%

-9

%En

gine

erin

g

Day

43

27

49

27

51

30

54

34

72

37

33%

9%

67

%

39%

Even

ing

58

22

57

22

76

22

70

27

83

29

19%

8%

43

%

34%

Othe

r 6

18

2 32

-

- 1

31

- -

-100

%

-100

%

-100

%

-100

%

Tota

l 10

7 24

10

8 25

12

7 25

12

5 30

15

5 33

24

%

9%

45%

40

%Ho

nors

Da

y 6

16

8 15

6

20

4 22

6

16

50%

-2

7%

0%

0%Ev

enin

g -

- -

- -

- 1

23

1 16

-

- -

-Ot

her

5 13

3

15

3 19

6

13

4 17

-3

3%

25%

-2

0%

29%

Tota

l 11

15

11

15

9

19

11

17

11

16

0%

-6%

0%

12

%

Law

Da

y 44

31

41

28

41

25

36

27

34

24

-6

%

-10%

-2

3%

-23%

Even

ing

40

22

29

19

33

17

26

19

23

21

-12%

12

%

-43%

-3

%Ot

her

3 27

4

27

3 19

3

17

7 21

13

3%

28%

13

3%

-20%

To

tal

87

27

74

24

77

21

65

23

64

23

-2%

-2

%

-26%

-1

5%

Tabl

e 6.

11:

Spri

ng S

ecti

on E

nrol

lmen

t by

Tim

e of

Day

and

Col

lege

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

(con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)


Per

cent

Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1-

Year

5-

Year

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Sect

ions

Av

g. S

ize

Nurs

ing

Da

y 14

67

14

70

14

70

17

57

14

71

-1

8%

25%

0%

6%

Othe

r 14

13

13

17

11

16

10

19

15

19

50

%

3%

7%

48%

Tota

l 28

40

27

44

25

46

27

43

29

44

7%

4%

4%

11

%Ot

her

Da

y 42

18

45

17

49

14

49

15

3

14

-94%

-5

%

-93%

-2

1%Ev

enin

g 2

20

9 20

6

18

5 16

-1

00%

-1

00%

-1

00%

-1

00%

Othe

r 3

33

3 44

2

49

2 46

2

48

0%

4%

-33%

45

%

To

tal

47

19

57

19

57

15

56

16

5 28

-9

1%

71%

-8

9%

46%

Sc

ienc

e

Day

194

40

207

42

210

43

252

39

236

42

-6%

7%

22

%

3%Ev

enin

g 94

30

88

31

91

32

84

30

93

30

11

%

0%

-1%

2%

Othe

r 54

27

53

28

58

28

67

26

74

28

10

%

4%

37%

2%

To

tal

342

35

348

37

359

38

403

35

403

36

0%

3%

18%

3%

Unde

rgra

duat

e St

udie

s

Day

8 23

8

26

8 24

8

24

8 29

0%

21

%

0%

23%

Even

ing

- -

1 21

1

20

1 23

1

29

0%

26%

-

-

Tota

l 8

23

9 25

9

24

9 24

9

29

0%

22%

13

%

23%

Ur

ban

Affa

irs

Da

y 14

37

11

41

13

37

10

44

11

44

10

%

-1%

-2

1%

19%

Even

ing

50

17

46

18

50

17

55

18

52

18

-5%

-3

%

4%

3%Ot

her

28

45

26

44

28

41

31

41

32

38

3%

-7%

14

%

-15%

To

tal

92

29

83

29

91

27

96

28

95

28

-1%

-2

%

3%

-3%

Un

iver

sity

Tot

al

Da

y 81

7 32

84

2 33

86

1 33

92

0 32

92

4 33

0%

3%

13

%

3%Ev

enin

g 63

7 23

62

4 23

62

7 23

62

7 24

61

3 24

-2

%

0%

-4%

4%

Othe

r 29

3 26

30

1 26

31

0 26

33

8 26

36

9 26

9%

0%

26

%

0%

Tota

l 1,

747

27

1,76

7 28

1,

798

28

1,88

5 28

1,

906

29

1%

4%

9%

7%

Note

s: T

his

tabl

e on

ly re

flect

s le

ctur

e, s

emin

ar a

nd s

tudi

o co

urse

s w

ith 5

or m

ore

stud

ents

enr

olle

d.

*Oth

er in

clud

es w

eeke

nds

(Frid

ay a

fter 4

pm

, Sat

urda

y an

d Su

nday

) and

sec

tions

with

no

clas

s tim

e. C

ross

list

ed c

ours

es a

re c

ount

ed o

nce

only.

Day,

Even

ing

and

Wee

kend

cou

rses

are

det

erm

ined

by

mee

ting

time.

Som

e w

eb c

ours

es m

ay b

e in

clud

ed d

ue to

ava

ilabl

e m

eetin

g tim

e.

Day:

Mon

day

– Fr

iday

7 a

m to

4 p

m.

Even

ing:

Mon

day

– Th

ursd

ay 4

pm

to 1

2 am

.

Tabl

e 6.

11:

Spri

ng S

ecti

on E

nrol

lmen

t by

Tim

e of

Day

and

Col

lege

: 5-Y

ear T

rend

(con

tinue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age)


Sec

tio

n

6

137

Da

y Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Even

ing

Perc

ent C

hang

e W

eeke

nds

Perc

ent C

hang

e Un

know

n Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1

Year

5

Year

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1

Year

5

Year

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Busin

ess

626

581

607

630

722

15%

15

%

401

399

386

406

309

-24%

-2

3%

5 1

1 -

- -

- 99

14

5 15

7 18

7 22

0 18

%

122%

CLAS

S 24

89 2

548

2755

25

33

2475

-2

%

-1%

67

9 71

7 64

6 54

8 61

4 12

%

-10%

9

3 2

- -

- -1

00%

31

5 31

4 31

4 27

7 33

3 20

%

6%Ed

ucat

ion

181

164

150

162

174

8%

-3%

13

7 15

0 14

7 11

7 11

8 1%

-1

3%

4 4

3 9

10

16%

16

3%

165

172

197

191

204

7%

24%

Nurs

ing

246

258

261

246

255

3%

3%

2 2

1 3

3 -4

%

- 2

- -

- 1

- -

24

22

20

24

28

15%

18

%En

gine

erin

g 28

1 27

5 32

0 44

3 55

2 25

%

96%

18

4 20

1 23

1 21

1 32

6 54

%

77%

5

- -

- -

- -

20

16

12

6 14

12

2%

-30%

Scie

nce

2258

239

0 25

39

2292

24

45

7%

8%

515

598

610

568

561

-1%

9%

17

13

20

6

7 6%

-6

0%

235

261

311

284

337

19%

43

%Ur

ban

Affa

irs

122

129

121

99

108

9%

-12%

12

6 11

3 13

2 11

5 12

6 10

%

0%

16

7 7

16

16

1%

4%

296

284

283

245

231

-6%

-2

2%Un

derg

radu

ate

76

89

98

89

93

4%

22%

4

3 6

5 7

46%

97

%

- -

- -

- -

- -

3 2

1 -

-100

%

-

Stud

ies

Hono

rs

8 7

8 6

7 13

%

-9%

-

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- 2

1 0

1 2

- -

Othe

r 7

11

12

4 4

-8%

-4

5%

2 0

0 1

1 40

%

-67%

-

- -

- -

- -

9 15

13

16

15

-7

%

64%

Tota

l 6,

294

6,45

1 6,

872

6,50

4 6,

833

5%

9% 2

,050

2,

184

2,15

9 1,

973

2,06

5 5%

1%

57

27

33

31

34

10

%

-40%

1,

164

1,23

3 1,

308

1,23

3 1,

384

12%

19

%1 O

ther

incl

udes

stu

dent

s en

rolle

d in

Air

Forc

e, C

aree

r Ser

vices

, Eng

lish

as a

Sec

ond

Lang

uage

, Milit

ary

Scie

nce,

Spe

cial

pro

gram

and

Stu

dy A

broa

d.

Tabl

e 6.

12:

Fall

Und

ergr

adua

te S

tude

nt F

TE b

y C

olle

ge a

nd C

lass

Tim

e: 5

-Yea

r Tre

nd

Fall

2011

– 2

015

Tabl

e 6.

13:

Fall

Gra

duat

e &

Law

Stu

dent

FTE

by

Col

lege

and

Cla

ss T

ime:

5-Y

ear T

rend

Fa

ll 20

11 –

201

5

Da

y Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Even

ing

Perc

ent C

hang

e W

eeke

nds

Perc

ent C

hang

e Un

know

n Pe

rcen

t Cha

nge

Colle

ge

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1

Year

5

Year

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

1

Year

5

Year

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

1 Ye

ar

5 Ye

ar

Busin

ess

56

48

36

43

16

-64%

-7

2%

441

445

445

367

281

-24%

-3

6%

81

43

46

47

32

-32%

-6

0%

102

131

141

122

122

0%

20%

CLAS

S 60

61

52

64

51

-2

0%

-15%

19

0 15

9 15

2 15

1 12

9 -1

5%

-32%

43

42

43

33

29

-1

3%

-33%

66

78

64

76

70

-7

%

7%Ed

ucat

ion

14

2 8

16

11

-30%

-1

8%

353

327

316

260

237

-9%

-3

3%

30

21

19

14

22

61%

-2

6%

221

238

242

233

232

-1%

5%

Engi

neer

ing

12

18

18

35

93

165%

65

5%

144

123

150

199

274

38%

90

%

- -

- -

- -

- 40

37

40

52

36

-3

1%

-10%

Nurs

ing

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- 20

22

22

18

18

-1

%

-12%

Scie

nce

227

246

228

233

238

2%

5%

122

124

122

98

96

-2%

-2

1%

- -

- 6

8 -

- 13

1 12

6 14

4 15

0 14

9 -1

%

14%

Urba

n Af

fairs

1

- -

- -

- -

138

132

118

100

106

6%

-23%

6

- -

- -

- -

30

18

17

16

18

12%

-3

8%La

w

299

262

255

243

216

-11%

-2

8%

178

163

131

120

110

-8%

-3

8%

7 8

6 6

1 -8

2%

-86%

11

19

16

12

25

10

3%

121%

Othe

r -

1 0

1 -

100%

-

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

58

58

50

57

56

-3%

-4

%To

tal

669

639

598

635

625

-2%

-7

% 1

,565

1,

472

1,43

4 1,

295

1,23

3 -5

%

-21%

16

6 11

3 11

4 10

6 92

-1

3%

-45%

67

8 72

6 73

6 73

6 72

5 -2

%

7%No

tes:

Days

: Mon

day –

Frid

ay 7

a.m

. to

4 p.

m.

Even

ings

: Mon

day

– Th

ursd

ay 4

p.m

. to

12 a

.m.

Wee

kend

s: C

lass

es s

tart

afte

r Frid

ay 4

p.m

., Sa

turd

ay a

nd S

unda

y.

*Unk

now

n in

clud

es s

ectio

ns w

ith n

o cl

ass

time.

Sour

ce: A

ll fig

ures

are

take

n fro

m c

ensu

s fil

es.


Table 6.14a: Annual Web Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends WEB



Summer 3,153 3,203 3,085 3,195 3,186 0% 1% 16,045 16,575 16,023 17,195 15,193 -12% -5%Fall 4,402 4,622 4,785 4,960 5,351 8% 22% 20,027 21,585 22,575 21,208 23,784 12% 19%Spring 4,469 4,592 4,502 5,000 5,527 11% 24% 20,675 21,359 21,042 21,885 24,319 11% 18%Total 12,024 12,417 12,372 13,155 14,064 7% 17% 56,747 59,519 59,640 60,288 63,296 5% 12%* Web-based: Courses deliver primarily using the Internet. These courses are identified by their class attribute (Online and/or Blended).

Note: In prior years, enrollment and SCH was based on those students who did not have a withdrawal date for a Web Based Course. This was inconsistent with the rest of the Book of Trends and has been

changed this year to maintain better consistency within the book.

Enrollment within each semester is unduplicated, but Total may be duplicated if a student was enrolled in multiple terms over the year.

Figure 6.14a: Annual Web Historical Enrollment and SCH Trends

Center for eLearningIn 2006 the Center for eLearning was established to lead the University’s eLearning initiative. The Center has the goals of increasing University enrollments and enhancing academic quality through fully online degree and certificate programs available.

The Center’s major roles are to:

n Provide leadership for the University’s eLearning initiative

n Support and train faculty in designing and developing fully online, blended, and Web-enhanced courses

n Work with academic units on eLearning program development and marketing

n Lead in the use of emerging eLearning technologies

n Ensure availability of information and services for online students

Since its establishment, the Center has worked energetically to create a solid support infrastructure for eLearning and to expand the number of programs and courses offered in online or blended formats. As the charts below show, substantial growth in eLearning enrollments has occurred as more online and blended courses are being offered. Enrollments in eLearning courses have continued to grow rapidly, new programs have joined the group of programs already offered online, and support for both faculty and students is strong.


Sec

tio

n

6

139

Table 6.14b: 5-Year Trends in Web-Based Instructional Delivery Student Credit Hours Generated

Undergraduate

Fall Percent Change

Web-Based** 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-Year 5-Year

Business 1,412 2,001 2,294 2,634 3,225 22% 128%CLASS 3,396 3,619 3,460 2,901 3,621 25% 7%Education 1,433 1,504 2,023 2,027 2,174 7% 52%Engineering 253 227 64 - 110 - -57%Nursing 354 327 298 315 417 32% 18%Science 3,084 3,589 3,932 3,777 4,648 23% 51%Urban Affairs 4,509 4,181 4,152 3,579 3,369 -6% -25%Other (AF-CSC-MSC) 92 100 90 88 97 10% 5%

Total 14,533 15,548 16,313 15,321 17,861 -6% 28%

Graduate

Fall Percent Change


Business 1,320 1,540 1,767 1,390 1,618 16% 23%CLASS 163 305 144 246 243 -1% 49%Education 2,821 2,927 3,079 2,886 3,047 6% 8%Engineering 92 84 152 388 - - -Law - - - - 154 - -Nursing 303 331 320 267 266 0% -12%Science 459 674 622 606 651 7% 42%Urban Affairs 336 168 160 104 144 38% -57%Other (AF-CSC-MSC) - 8 18 - - - -Total 5,494 6,037 6,262 5,887 6,123 -6% 15%

Totals

Fall Percent Change


Business 2,732 3,541 4,061 4,024 4,843 20% 77%CLASS 3,559 3,924 3,604 3,147 3,864 23% 9%Education 4,254 4,431 5,102 4,913 5,221 6% 23%Engineering 345 311 216 388 110 -72% -68%Law - - - - 154 - -Nursing - - 618 582 683 17% -Science 3,543 4,263 4,554 4,383 5,299 21% 50%Urban Affairs 4,845 4,349 4,312 3,683 3,513 -5% -27%Other (AF-CSC-MSC) 92 108 108 88 97 10% 5%Total 19,370 20,927 22,575 21,208 23,784 12% 23%

** Web-based: Courses delivered primarily using the Internet. These courses are identified by their class attribute (Online and/or Blended).

Note: In prior years these figures were calculated using end of term enrollment numbers, as opposed to census date numbers. Because these tables were the only tables in the entire book to use this methodology, for consistency’s sake we have decided to recalculate these tables using census data.


Trends in Interactive Video DeliveryThe rapid growth in distance delivered student credit hours illustrates the important role distance learning plays today at many institutions, including Cleveland State. New technology, equipment, growing faculty interest, and support services at CSU have led to an increase in courses offered, the number of students enrolled, and smoother instructional delivery. Faculty development workshops and individual training and support in conducting interactive video classes along with creating web-based classes have been instrumental in developing these courses. Interactive video hook-ups now link our extended campuses and partner schools with the Main Campus, providing students the opportunity to take a class at another site which might not have been possible in the past. Web-based courses provide even more scheduling flexibility.

Table 6.15: 5-Year Trends in Interactive Video Delivery Student Credit Hours Generated

Undergraduate

Fall Percent Change

Interactive Video* 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1-Year 5-Year

CLASS 52 - - 33 48 45% -8%Engineering - 108 124 - - - -Science 81 99 20 - - - -Urban Affairs 828 436 548 393 314 -20% -62%Total 961 643 692 426 362 0% -56%

Graduate

Fall Percent Change


CLASS 1,170 501 453 438 309 -29% -74%Education 213 140 225 - - - -Science - - - 87 - - -Urban Affairs 28 4 - - 4 - -86%Total 1,411 645 678 525 313 -40% -78%

Total

Fall Percent Change


CLASS 1,222 501 453 471 357 -24% -71%Education 213 140 225 - - - -Engineering - 108 124 - - - -Science 81 99 20 87 - - -Urban Affairs 856 440 548 393 318 -19% -63%Total 2,372 1,288 1,370 951 675 -29% -72%

* Interactive video: Courses delivered via interactive television at two or more sites simutaneously and are identified by their class attribute (IDVL).


Sec

tio

n

6

141

Library FY 2015

Resources Total Titles Total Volumes/Items

Print Resources in Scholar Monographs 464,653 541,661Scores 13,793 22,465Periodicals and books (to be added to Scholar) 0 0Classed Serials 6,155 55,266Periodicals 25,831 160,447Theses and Dissertations 3,445 4,493Print Resources in Microform 10,679 224,504Total Print Resources 524,556 1,008,836Media Resources in Scholar Audio Resources 16,792 21,514Video Resource 17,126 20,098Other Resources 888 2,755Total Media Resources 34,806 44,367Total Physical Resources 559,362 1,053,203

Electronic Resources in Scholar Electronic Books 228,118 228,146Electronic Journals 53,015 53,015Electronic Serials 194 194Databases 733 729Websites 1,272 1,255Streaming Audio 4,772 4,772Streaming Video 9,823 9,823Total Electronic Resources 297,927 297,934

Total digital resources in CONTENTdm 60,793 60,793

Total digital resources in EngagedScholarship@CSU 11,284 11,284

Total Locally Digitized Resources 72,077 72,077

Total Digital Resources 370,004 370,011

GRAND TOTAL 929,366 1,423,214

Archival Resources Number of Collections Linear FeetSpecial Collections 510 7,696University Archives 450 3,493Total Archival Resources 960 11,189 Current Subscriptions Number of Titles FY15Paper Periodical 18Electronic Periodicals (paid subscriptions, including EJC) 11,422Other Paper Continuing Resources 73Other Electronic Continuing Resources (not journals) 410Total Subscriptions 11,923

Table 6.16: Cleveland State University Michael Schwartz Library Collections, FY 2015


2012 2013 2014 2015 Requests Filled Requests Filled Requests Filled Requests Filled

Number of material requests sent by Law library 2,329 2,286 2,386 2,374 1,797 1,763 1,250 1,238Number of material request received by Law library 2,596 2,012 1,803 1,554 1,680 1,481 1,346 1,178Source: Law Library

Table 6.17: Michael Schwartz Library Use Statistics

Table 6.19: Cleveland State University Law Library Statistics 2012-2015

2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Titles Total Vol./ Units Total Titles Total Vol./ Units Total Titles Total Vol./ Units Total Titles Total Vol./ Units

Titles and Volumes: Print titles 78,730 - 72,167 - 72,234 - 69,816 -Non-book and Electronic Titles 20,662 - 23,429 - 24,035 - 41,686 -Microformats 71,082 - 71,082 - 71,082 - 71,082 - Volumes (excluding microforms) - 290,850 - 273,783 - 273,406 - 265,410Volumes equivalent of microforms - 235,776 - 235,769 - 235,768 - 235,647Source: Law Library

Table 6.18: Cleveland State University Law Library Collections 2012-2015

DIGITAL RESOURCE USE TRENDS FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

Searches on Scholar catalog 1,623,618 1,921,510 3,045,695 1,679,457Electronic resource searches (OhioLINK ) 1,608,342 2,682,681 2,497,713 2,153,954Electronic resource searches (CSU purchased) 307,958 369,815 393,248 285,528Electronic resource downloads (OhioLINK) 370,527 410,995 436,465 428,858Electronic resource downloads (CSU purchased) 76,950 113,563 95,680 81,246Electronic books use (OhioLINK) 37,099 21,665 21,062 21,907Electronic books use (ebrary section requests - CSU purchased) 108,167 82,772 68,688 74,071Electronic books use (ebrary section requests - CSU produced) 56,168 n/a* n/a* n/a*Electronic theses/dissertations use (downloaded from ProQuest and OhioLINK ETD) 132,800 71,676 47,060 52,133OhioLINK Digital Resource Center use (downloads) 1,179 4,109 4,109 5,101OhioLINK digital video use (uses=hits on files) 596 n/a n/a n/aFilms on Demand (titles viewed) 45 (partial) 3,527 3,726 3,918OhioLINK digital audio use (Naxos music downloads) 15,410 20,274 6,201 3,416ARTstor searches and browse 18,913 15,899 24,200 4,873ARTstor access events (view, print, download, etc.) 21,322 33,101 52,743 11,090EngagedScholarship@CSU (downloads) n/a 68,937 198,762 376,358Hits to the Library’s streaming media files 4,258 80,478 82,567 89,864Page Views on Cleveland Memory 33,157,836 279,082† 280,149 285,502Page Views on the Library website 39,341,890 1,397,600† 1,274,545 1,194,213Page Views on Library’s Virtual Reference webpages 48,746 19,241 17,940 15,350Page Views on Library’s Subject Portal webpages 128,188 n/a** n/a** n/a** OTHER TRENDS FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15

Percent of materials budget spent on electronic resources 96% 95% 95% 96%Items checked out 130,874 122,596 107,446 89,374Visitors to the Library 527,989 542,473 532,126 531,063Visitors (virtual) to the Library webpage 411,326† 440,548 350,523 391,583Visitors (virtual) to Cleveland Memory 97,613† 130,511 116,825 121,443Items borrowed from other OhioLINK libraries 24,485 21,810 17,697 14,651Items loaned to other OhioLINK libraries 12,869 10,667 9,303 8,374Items borrowed from libraries through ILL (beyond Ohio) 2,273 2,235 4,209 6,082Items loaned to libraries through ILL (beyond Ohio) 7,096 5,376 3,434 2,984Reference and technical questions answered 34,546 25,624 30,737 28,002Librarian led instructional sessions 413 394 382 378In-house faculty led instructional sessions 1,032 942 1,036 1,188Other Library facility bookings for campus activities 650 823 984 1,011IMS media equipment circulations to faculty 13,861 n/a*** n/a*** n/a***† Method of statistics gathering changed to use of Google Analytics ‡Ebooks not loaded in EBC and statistics not yet available from vendors websites

* Moved to new platform ** Subject portals have been retired *** IMS is no longer part of the Library


Sec

tio

n

6

143

Sec

tio

n

7

Faculty & Staff

7Book of Trends

147Section 7 - Faculty & Staff

Sec

tio

n

7

Table 7.1: Full-Time Employees by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) Fall 2015

Figure 7.1: Full-Time Employees by SOC Category Fall 2015

SOC Category Count % of Total

Management 261 16.8%Faculty 524 33.8%Archivists/Curators/Museum Technicians 17 1.1%Non-Postsecondary Teaching 81 5.2%Business/Financial Operations 88 5.7%Computer/Engineering/Science 137 8.8%Comm Service/Legal/Arts/Media 64 4.1%Health Practitioners & Technical Occupations 15 1.0%Service 105 6.8%Sales and Related 3 0.2%Office/Administrative Support 222 14.3%Natural Resources/Construct/Mnt 23 1.5%Production/Transport/Material 11 0.7%Total Full-time Employees 1,551 100%Source: All figures are taken from the IPEDS/EAP files as of November 1.


Table 7.2: Full-Time Employees by Gender, Ethnicity, and (SOC) Category Fall 2012 - Fall 2015

2012 2013 2014 2015

SOC Category/Ethnicity Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female

Management Non Resident Alien - - - - - - - - White 86 91 86 100 87 109 87 118 Black/African American 7 27 7 26 9 23 9 23 Hispanic/Latino 4 1 6 2 7 3 6 3 Asian 10 2 8 3 7 3 8 3 American Indian/Alaskan Native - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races 1 - 1 1 1 1 - 2 Unknown - - - 1 - - - - Total 108 121 109 133 112 140 111 150

Faculty Non Resident Alien 9 3 13 4 11 5 16 6 White 220 160 206 161 213 170 209 172 Black/African American 15 20 17 21 17 20 14 18 Hispanic/Latino 9 3 9 3 9 4 8 5 Asian 56 23 54 20 54 19 53 19 American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - 1 - 1 Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 1 - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - 1 - 1 - 2 Unknown - 1 - 2 - 1 - 1 Total 310 210 299 212 304 221 300 224

Archivists/Curators/Museum Technicians Non Resident Alien - - - - - - - - White 3 13 3 13 2 13 4 11 Black/African American - - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino - - 1 - 1 - - - Asian - 1 - 1 - 1 - 2 American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - - - - Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 3 14 4 14 3 14 4 13

Non-Postsecondary Teaching Non Resident Alien - 1 - - - - - - White 16 45 15 46 18 48 16 42 Black/African American 1 9 1 10 3 11 3 11 Hispanic/Latino - 3 - 3 1 5 2 4 Asian - - - - - - - 1 American Indian/Alaskan Native - 1 - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - 2 - 2 - 3 - 2 Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 17 61 16 61 22 67 21 60


Sec

tio

n

7


2012 2013 2014 2015


Business/Financial Operations Non Resident Alien 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - White 23 42 23 45 16 45 18 45 Black/African American 3 13 7 14 4 18 4 18 Hispanic/Latino - 2 1 1 - - - 1 Asian - - - - - - - - American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - 1 - 1 Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 27 57 32 60 21 64 23 65

Computer/Engineering/Science Non Resident Alien 3 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 White 74 35 75 29 81 27 77 26 Black/African American 5 5 6 5 6 5 6 6 Hispanic/Latino - 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 Asian 9 2 9 2 9 2 10 3 American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - - 1 - Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 91 46 95 40 99 38 97 40

Comm Service/Legal/Arts/Media Non Resident Alien 1 - - 1 - 2 - 2 White 23 22 24 20 22 23 23 23 Black/African American 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 Hispanic/Latino 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 2 Asian - - - - 1 - 1 - American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - 1 - 1 1 Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 33 30 32 28 31 31 31 33

Health Practitioners & Technical Occupations Non Resident Alien - - - - - - - - White 2 8 2 8 2 8 2 9 Black/African American - 1 - 2 1 2 1 2 Hispanic/Latino - - - - - - 1 Asian 1 1 1 - - - - - American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - - - - Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 3 10 3 10 3 10 3 12



2012 2013 2014 2015


Service Non Resident Alien - - - - - - - - White 27 4 24 4 27 4 26 4 Black/African American 39 25 38 24 39 30 35 32 Hispanic/Latino 4 1 4 1 5 1 6 2 Asian - - - - 1 - - - American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - - - - Unknown 2 - 2 - - - - - Total 72 30 68 29 72 35 67 38

Sales and Related Non Resident Alien - - - - - - - - White 2 - 1 1 3 1 3 - Black/African American 1 - 1 - - - - - Hispanic/Latino - - - - 1 - - - Asian - - - - - - - - American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - - - - Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 3 - 2 1 4 1 3

Office/Administrative Support Non Resident Alien - - - - - - 1 - White 14 135 14 136 16 125 17 116 Black/African American 8 73 9 67 7 72 4 73 Hispanic/Latino 1 2 1 4 1 5 1 4 Asian 1 3 1 2 - 2 - 2 American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - 2 - 1 - 2 Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - 2 - 2 - 1 - 2 Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 24 215 25 213 24 206 23 199

Natural Resources/Construct/Mnt Non Resident Alien - - - - - - - - White 21 - 15 - 18 - 18 - Black/African American 6 - 6 - 4 - 4 - Hispanic/Latino 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Asian - - - - - - - - American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - - - - Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 28 - 22 23 23


Sec

tio

n

7


Source: All figures are taken from the IPEDS/EAP files as of November 1.

Note: Non Resident Alien are put into the actual race categories.

Note: Please see that Asian/Pacific Islander was split into two categories. Also a new category of two or more races was added per Federal Reporting Rule Changes.

2012 2013 2014 2015


Production/Transport/Material Non Resident Alien - - - - - - - - White 8 - 6 1 7 1 6 1 Black/African American 1 1 - - - - 1 1 Hispanic/Latino 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - Asian - - - - 1 - 1 - American Indian/Alaskan Native - - - - - - - - Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian - - - - - - - - Two or More Races - - - - - - - - Unknown - - - - - - - - Total 10 1 7 1 9 1 9 2

Total Full-Time Employees Non Resident Alien 14 6 18 7 14 9 20 10 White 519 555 494 564 512 574 506 567 Black/African American 94 182 99 176 96 187 86 189 Hispanic/Latino 21 14 26 16 29 20 27 25 Asian 77 32 73 28 73 27 73 30 Native American/Alaskan Native - 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 1 - - - - - - - Two or More Races 1 4 1 6 2 7 2 10 Unknown 2 1 2 3 - 1 - 1 Total 729 795 714 802 727 828 715 836


Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees: Women and Minorities as a Percentage of Total by SOC Category Fall 2012 - Fall 2015

2012 2013 2014 2015

Management Women 53% 55% 56% 57%Blacks/African American 15% 14% 13% 12%Hispanic/Latino 2% 3% 4% 3%Asian 5% 5% 4% 4%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 1% 1%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 1% 1% 1%Minorities 23% 23% 22% 21%

Faculty Women 40% 41% 42% 43%Blacks/African American 7% 7% 7% 6%Hispanic/Latino 2% 2% 2% 2%Asian 15% 14% 14% 14%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%Minorities 24% 24% 24% 23%

Archivists/Curators/Museum Technicians Women 82% 78% 82% 76%Blacks/African American 0% 0% 0% 0%Hispanic/Latino 0% 6% 6% 0%Asian 6% 6% 6% 12%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%Minorities 6% 11% 12% 12%

Non-Postsecondary Teaching Women 78% 79% 75% 74%Blacks/African American 13% 14% 16% 17%Hispanic/Latino 4% 4% 7% 7%Asian 0% 0% 0% 1%Native American/Alaskan Native 1% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 3% 3% 3% 2%Minorities 21% 21% 26% 28%

2012 2013 2014 2015

Business/Financial Operations Women 68% 65% 75% 74%Blacks/African American 19% 23% 26% 25%Hispanic/Latino 2% 2% 0% 1%Asian 0% 0% 0% 0%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 1% 1%Minorities 21% 25% 27% 27%

Computer/Engineering/Science Women 34% 30% 28% 29%Blacks/African American 7% 8% 8% 9%Hispanic/Latino 1% 2% 2% 3%Asian 8% 8% 8% 9%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 1%Minorities 17% 19% 18% 22%

Comm Service/Legal/Arts/Media Women 48% 47% 50% 52%Blacks/African American 25% 23% 19% 16%Hispanic/Latino 2% 2% 2% 5%Asian 0% 0% 2% 2%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 2% 3%Minorities 27% 25% 24% 25%

Health Practitioners & Technical Occupations Women 77% 77% 77% 80%Blacks/African American 8% 15% 23% 20%Hispanic/Latino 0% 0% 0% 7%Asian 15% 8% 0% 0%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%Minorities 23% 23% 23% 27%


Sec

tio

n

7

Table 7.3: Full-Time Employees: Women and Minorities as a Percentage of Total by SOC Category Fall 2012 - Fall 2015


Note: Minorities include Black, Hispanics, Asian, Native American/Alaskan Native, Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian, and Two or More Races.

2012 2013 2014 2015

Service Women 29% 30% 33% 36%Blacks/African American 63% 64% 64% 64%Hispanic/Latino 5% 5% 6% 8%Asian 0% 0% 1% 0%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%Minorities 68% 69% 71% 71%

Sales and Related Women 0% 33% 20% 0%Blacks/African American 33% 33% 0% 0%Hispanic/Latino 0% 0% 20% 0%Asian 0% 0% 0% 0%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%Minorities 33% 33% 20% 0%

Office/Administrative Support Women 90% 89% 90% 90%Blacks/African American 34% 32% 34% 35%Hispanic/Latino 1% 2% 3% 2%Asian 2% 1% 1% 1%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 1% 0% 1%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 1% 1% 0% 1%Minorities 38% 37% 39% 40%

Natural Resources/Construct/Mnt Women 0% 0% 0% 0%Blacks/African American 21% 27% 17% 17%Hispanic/Latino 4% 5% 4% 4%Asian 0% 0% 0% 0%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%Minorities 25% 32% 22% 22%

2012 2013 2014 2015

Production/Transport/Material Women 9% 13% 10% 18%Blacks/African American 18% 0% 0% 18%Hispanic/Latino 9% 13% 10% 9%Asian 0% 0% 10% 9%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 0% 0%Minorities 27% 13% 20% 36%

Total Full-Time Employees Women 52% 53% 53% 54%Blacks/African American 18% 18% 18% 18%Hispanic/Latino 2% 3% 3% 3%Asian 7% 7% 6% 7%Native American/Alaskan Native 0% 0% 0% 0%Other Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian 0% 0% 0% 0%Two or More Races 0% 0% 1% 1%Minorities 28% 28% 29% 29%


Table 7.4: Total Employees by SOC Category Fall 2012 - Fall 2015

Employees

2012 2013 2014 2015

Full Part Full Part Full Part Full PartSOC Category Description Time Time Total Time Time Total Time Time Total Time Time Total

Management 229 16 245 242 21 263 252 24 276 261 19 280 Faculty 520 521 1,041 511 558 1,069 525 608 1,133 524 595 1,119 Archivists/Curators/Museum 17 - 17 18 - 18 17 - 17 17 - 17 TechniciansNon-Postsecondary Teaching 78 5 83 77 5 82 89 5 94 81 7 88 Business/Financial Operations 84 6 90 92 7 99 85 6 91 88 6 94 Computer/Engineering/Science 137 6 143 135 9 144 137 9 146 137 10 147 Comm Service/Legal/Arts/Media 63 35 98 60 34 94 62 37 99 64 82 146 Health Practitioners & Technical 13 1 14 13 1 14 13 1 14 15 - 15 OccupationsService 102 31 133 97 36 133 107 30 137 105 25 130 Sales and Related 3 2 5 3 1 4 5 - 5 3 - 3 Office/Administrative Support 239 30 269 238 33 271 230 26 256 222 24 246 Natural Resources/Construct/Mnt 28 - 28 22 - 22 23 - 23 23 - 23 Production/Transport/Material 11 1 12 8 - 8 10 - 10 11 - 11

Total Employees 1,524 654 2,178 1,516 705 2,221 1,555 746 2,301 1,551 768 2,319



Sec

tio

n

7

Regular Faculty Term Faculty

Male Female Male Female Total

College N % N % N % N % N %

Business 30 48% 16 25% 12 19% 5 8% 63 12%

CLASS 70 50% 49 35% 10 7% 12 9% 141 27%

Education 25 43% 32 55% - 0% 1 2% 58 11%

Engineering 53 83% 6 9% 3 5% 2 3% 64 12%

Nursing - 0% 16 59% 2 7% 9 33% 27 5%

Science 60 50% 41 34% 9 8% 10 8% 120 23%

Urban Affairs 9 43% 10 48% 1 5% 1 5% 21 4%

Law 13 43% 7 23% 3 10% 7 23% 30 6%

TOTAL 260 50% 177 34% 40 8% 47 9% 524 100%

Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Instructor Term Faculty TotalCollege N % N % N % N % N % N

Business 12 19% 16 25% 14 22% 4 6% 17 27% 63

CLASS 33 23% 61 43% 24 17% 1 1% 22 16% 141

Education 10 17% 30 52% 16 28% 1 2% 1 2% 58

Engineering 21 33% 21 33% 15 23% 2 3% 5 8% 64

Nursing - 0% 11 41% 5 19% - 0% 11 41% 27

Science 32 27% 44 37% 25 21% - 0% 19 16% 120

Urban Affairs 4 19% 7 33% 8 38% - 0% 2 10% 21

Law 13 43% 7 23% - 0% - 0% 10 33% 30

TOTAL 125 24% 197 38% 107 20% 8 2% 87 17% 524

Note: Includes only standard academic ranks.

Table 7.5 Full-Time Faculty by Rank and College Fall 2015

Table 7.6: Full-Time Faculty by Gender and College Fall 2015


Table 7.7: Full-Time Faculty by Highest Degree Attained, Fall 2015

Table 7.6a: Full-Time Faculty by College, Gender and Rank, Fall 2015 Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Instructor Term Faculty Total

College Gender N % N % N % N % N % N

Business F 3 14% 4 19% 6 29% 3 14% 5 24% 21 M 9 21% 12 29% 8 19% 1 2% 12 29% 42

CLASS F 14 23% 23 38% 12 20% - 0% 12 20% 61 M 19 24% 38 48% 12 15% 1 1% 10 13% 80

Education F 4 12% 17 52% 11 33% - 0% 1 3% 33 M 6 24% 13 52% 5 20% 1 4% - 0% 25

Engineering F 2 25% 3 38% 1 13% - 0% 2 25% 8 M 19 34% 18 32% 14 25% 2 4% 3 5% 56

Nursing F - 0% 11 44% 5 20% - 0% 9 36% 25 M - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 2 100% 2

Science F 7 14% 18 35% 16 31% - 0% 10 20% 51 M 25 36% 26 38% 9 13% - 0% 9 13% 69

Urban Affairs F 2 18% 3 27% 5 45% - 0% 1 9% 11 M 2 20% 4 40% 3 30% - 0% 1 10% 10

Law F 7 50% - 0% - 0% - 0% 7 50% 14 M 6 38% 7 44% - 0% - 0% 3 19% 16

TOTAL 125 24% 197 38% 107 20% 8 2% 87 17% 524

Note: Includes only standard academic ranks.Source: All figures are taken from the IPEDS/EAP files as of November 1.

DegreeCollege Bachelor’s Master’s Doctorate Professional Terminal Degree

Business 0% 25% 73% 2% 78%

CLASS 0% 22% 77% 0% 88%

Education 0% 9% 91% 0% 98%

Engineering 0% 9% 89% 0% 94%

Nursing 0% 74% 22% 0% 56%

Science 0% 13% 86% 1% 93%

Urban Affairs 0% 10% 86% 5% 90%

Law 0% 3% 7% 90% 100%

TOTAL 0% 18% 75% 6% 89%



Sec

tio

n

7

Tabl

e 7.

8: F

ull-

Tim

e Te

nure

d/Te

nure

-Tra

ck a

nd N

on-T

enur

e Tr

ack

Facu

lty

by C

olle

ge/D

epar

tmen

t:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

F

all

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

P

erce

nt C

hang

e

Te

nure

d No

n

Tenu

red

Non

Te

nure

d No

n

Tenu

red

Non

Te

nure

d No

n

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

Colle

ge/D

epar

tmen

t T

rack

Tr

ack

Tota

l T

rack

Tr

ack

Tota

l Tr

ack

Trac

k To

tal

Trac

k Tr

ack

Tota

l T

rack

Tr

ack

Tota

l 1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Busi

ness

Ac

coun

ting

9

6

1

5

11

6

1

7

10

5

1

5

10

5

1

5

10

4

1

4

-7%

-7

%Co

mpu

ter &

Info

rmat

ion

Scie

nce

12

4

1

6

12

3

1

5

12

3

1

5

12

3

1

5

4

2

6

-60%

-6

3%Fi

nanc

e 4

5

9

2

5

7

3

3

6

2

4

6

2

4

6

0%

-3

3%M

anag

emen

t 1

1

1

12

1

0

3

13

1

0

2

12

1

1

2

13

1

0

4

14

8%

17

%M

arke

ting

1

1

4

15

8

4

1

2

9

5

14

8

6

1

4

8

7

15

7%

0%

Oper

atio

n an

d Su

pply

Cha

in

6

2

8

6

2

8

5

2

7

6

2

8

6

2

8

0%

0%M

anag

emen

t

Busi

ness

Tota

l 5

3

22

7

5

49

2

3

72

4

9

20

6

9

49

2

2

71

4

0

23

6

3

-11%

-1

6%

Libe

ral A

rts

& S

ocia

l Sci

ence

s

Art

11

-

1

1

11

-

1

1

11

-

1

1

11

-

1

1

10

10

-9

%

-9%

Crim

inol

ogy,

Anth

ropo

logy

, and

Soc

iolo

gy

14

3

17

1

5

5

20

1

5

6

21

1

4

6

20

1

2

7

19

-5

%

12%

Econ

omic

s

5

1

6

5

2

7

6

1

7

6

1

7

4

3

7

0%

17%

Engl

ish

1

4

4

18

1

2

7

19

1

2

5

17

1

2

5

17

1

3

5

18

6%

0%

Hist

ory

1

5

-

15

1

5

-

15

1

3

-

13

1

2

1

13

1

1

2

13

0%

-1

3%M

usic

1

0

2

12

9

4

1

3

9

3

12

9

2

1

1

9

3

12

9%

0%

Philo

soph

y &

Com

para

tive

Relig

ion

10

-

1

0

9

-

9

7

1

8

7

1

8

5

3

8

0%

-20%

Polit

ical

Sci

ence

9

-

9

7

2

9

6

2

8

7

1

8

6

2

8

0%

-1

1%Sc

hool

of C

omm

unic

atio

n 1

9

2

21

1

7

3

20

1

5

5

20

1

6

4

20

1

6

4

20

0%

-5

%So

cial

Wor

k 1

0

2

12

8

3

1

1

8

3

11

9

3

1

2

8

2

10

-1

7%

-17%

Thea

tre a

nd D

ance

4

-

4

4

-

4

4

-

4

4

-

4

4

-

4

0%

0%

Wor

ld L

angu

ages

, Lite

ratu

re &

Cul

ture

9

2

1

1

10

2

1

2

10

2

1

2

9

2

11

9

3

1

2

9%

9%Li

bera

l Arts

& S

ocia

l Sci

ence

s T

otal

130

1

6

146

1

22

28

1

50

116

2

8

144

1

16

26

1

42

107

3

4

141

-1

%

-3%

(con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)


Tabl

e 7.

8: F

ull-

Tim

e Te

nure

d/Te

nure

-Tra

ck a

nd N

on-T

enur

e Tr

ack

Facu

lty

by C

olle

ge/D

epar

tmen

t:

5-Ye

ar T

rend

(con

tinue

d fro

m p

revi

ous

page

)

Fall

2011

20

12

2013

20

14

2015

P

erce

nt C

hang

e

Te

nure

d No

n

Tenu

red

Non

Te

nure

d No

n

Tenu

red

Non

Te

nure

d No

n

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

& T

enur

e Te

nure

Colle

ge/D

epar

tmen

t T

rack

Tr

ack

Tota

l T

rack

Tr

ack

Tota

l Tr

ack

Trac

k To

tal

Trac

k Tr

ack

Tota

l T

rack

Tr

ack

Tota

l 1

yea

r 5

yea

r

Educ

atio

n an

d Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

CA

SAL

16

-

1

6

14

-

1

4

14

-

1

4

13

1

1

4

12

1

1

3

-7%

-1

9%Cu

rricu

lum

& F

ound

atio

ns

13

-

1

3

11

1

1

2

11

2

1

3

11

2

1

3

11

3

1

4

8%

8%He

alth

And

Phy

sica

l Edu

catio

n 8

-

8

7

1

8

7

1

8

7

2

9

7

2

9

0%

13

%Te

ache

rs E

duca

tion

24

-

2

4

24

-

2

4

21

1

2

2

21

1

2

2

18

4

2

2

0%

-8%

Educ

atio

n an

d Hu

man

Ser

vice

s To

tal

61

-

6

1

56

2

5

8

53

4

5

7

52

6

5

8

48

1

0

58

0%

-5

%

Engi

neer

ing

Chem

ical

Eng

inee

ring

10

-

1

0

10

-

1

0

10

1

1

1

11

1

1

2

10

1

1

1

-8%

10

%Ci

vil &

Env

ironm

enta

l Eng

inee

ring

9

-

9

9

-

9

9

1

10

9

1

1

0

9

1

10

0%

11

%El

ectr

ical

Eng

inee

ring

and

Com

pute

r 1

5

-

15

1

5

-

15

1

5

-

15

1

5

-

15

2

1

5

26

73

%

73%

Scie

nce

Engi

neer

ing

Tech

nolo

gy

4

-

4

4

1

5

3

2

5

3

2

5

3

2

5

0%

25%

Mec

hani

cal E

ngin

eerin

g 8

-

8

7

1

8

9

1

1

0

11

1

1

2

10

2

1

2

0%

50%

Engi

neer

ing

Tota

l

46

-

4

6

45

2

4

7

46

5

5

1

49

5

5

4

53

1

1

64

19

%

39%

Law

28

12

4

0

25

1

0

35

2

3

11

3

4

22

1

0

32

2

0

10

3

0

-6%

-2

5%

Nurs

ing

15

4

1

9

14

7

2

1

15

9

2

4

18

7

2

5

16

1

1

27

8%

42

%

Scie

nce

Biol

ogy,

Geol

ogy

& En

viron

men

tal S

cien

ce

19

-

1

9

21

-

2

1

19

1

2

0

20

1

2

1

19

1

2

0

-5%

5%

Chem

istry

1

4

-

14

1

4

-

14

1

3

-

13

1

5

2

17

1

5

2

17

0%

21

%He

alth

Sci

ence

s 2

1

3

24

2

3

3

26

2

2

4

26

2

4

4

28

2

5

4

29

4%

21

%M

athe

mat

ics

2

1

4

25

2

0

7

27

2

0

8

28

1

8

8

26

1

9

8

27

4%

8%

Phys

ics

1

0

-

10

8

1

9

8

1

9

9

2

1

1

8

2

10

-9

%

0%Ps

ycho

logy

1

8

2

20

1

6

1

17

1

2

3

15

1

3

3

16

1

4

3

17

6%

-1

5%Sc

ienc

e To

tal

10

3

9

112

1

02

12

1

14

94

1

7

111

9

9

20

1

19

100

2

0

120

1%

7%

Urba

n Af

fairs

2

1

4

25

1

8

5

23

1

6

5

21

1

8

6

24

1

6

5

21

-1

3%

-16%

Univ

ersi

ty To

tal

45

7

67

5

24

431

8

9

520

4

12

99

5

11

423

1

02

525

4

00

124

5

24

0%

0%


Sec

tio

n

7

Table 7.9: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH) Generated by Full-Time Faculty Fall 2015

SCH Generated SCH Generated SCH Generated Total SCH % of SCH by Full-time by Part-time by Other Generated Generated byDepartment Description Faculty Faculty Instructors Full-time Faculty

College of Business Accounting Accounting 2,622 753 27 3,402 77% Business Law 0 471 0 471 0%Finance Finance 1,393 363 3 1,759 79%Health Care Administration Health Care Administration 0 108 0 108 0%Information Systems Information Science 1,264 732 210 2,206 57%Management Management 2,125 444 27 2,596 82%Marketing General Administration 405 516 0 921 44% Marketing 1,752 279 126 2,157 81%Operations & Supply Chain Operations & Supply Chain 1,544 538 216 2,298 67%Management Management

Other Business Business 1,122 1,242 301 2,665 42% International Business 183 0 0 183 100%

College of Business Total 12,410 5,446 910 18,766 66%

College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Art Art 1,071 795 36 1,902 56%Communication Communication 4,895 1,440 51 6,386 77%Criminology, Anthropology Anthropology 1,947 1,149 0 3,096 63%and Sociology Linguistics 96 0 3 99 97% Sociology 5,424 756 96 6,276 86%Economics Economics 2,070 234 0 2,304 90%English Developmental English 0 302 116 418 0% English 2,439 5,110 520 8,069 30%History History 3,057 1,884 0 4,941 62%Interdisciplinary Black Studies 0 105 369 474 0% Classical and Medieval Studies 1 0 0 1 100% Natl Student Exchange 0 0 60 60 0% Women’s Studies 0 393 0 393 0%Music Applied Music 13 400 3 416 3% Music 922 2,007 1 2,930 31%Philosophy and Comparative Philosophy 1,041 1,671 0 2,712 38%Religion

Religious Studies 917 687 0 1,604 57%Political Science/IR Political Science 1,254 321 0 1,575 80%Social Work Social Work 1,311 1,681 120 3,112 42%Theatre and Dance Dance 153 90 33 276 55% Theatre & Dance 498 391 31 920 54%World Languages, Literature Arabic 374 204 0 578 65%and Culture Chinese 0 0 118 118 0% French 225 116 0 341 66% German 0 160 0 160 0% Italian 96 120 0 216 44% Japanese 0 176 0 176 0% Latin 0 102 0 102 0% Modern Languages 81 126 0 207 39% Slovenian 0 104 0 104 0% Spanish 918 170 268 1,356 68%

College of Liberal Arts Total 28,803 20,694 1825 51,322 56%and Social Sciences

(continued on next page)



College of Education & Human Services CASAL Education Specialist 18 45 0 63 29%Curriculum and Foundations Curriculum & Instruction 331 233 223 787 42%Health And Physical Education Health and Physical Education 546 488 16 1,050 52% Health Education 156 927 0 1,083 14% HPER-Core Curriculum 0 159 62 221 0% Physical Education-Service 28 49 85 162 17%Teacher Education Early Childhood Education 642 183 0 825 78% Education U Teach 174 0 19 193 90% Education-SIP 87 463 0 550 16% Education-Special Offerings 0 41 0 41 0% ESL-Program 0 0 0 0 Middle Childhood Education 183 0 0 183 100% Special Education 291 270 0 561 52% Specialized Instructional/Teacher 498 546 0 1,044 48%

EducationSpecialized Study & Field Experiences 95 719 3 817 12%

Theatre and Dance Dance 0 12 0 12 0% College of Education & Human Services Total 3,049 4,135 408 7,592 40%

College of Engineering Chemical & Biomedical Chemical Engineering 1,019 0 0 1,019 100% Engineering Engineering Science 779 238 0 1,017 77%Civil & Environmental Civil Engineering 811 35 34 880 92% Engineering Engineering Science 592 0 0 592 100%Dean’s Office Engineering Science 0 0 325 325 0%Electrical Engineering Computer and Information Science 1,457 339 0 1,796 81% & Computer Science Electrical & Computer Engineering 1,518 54 147 1,719 88% Engineering Science 184 87 0 271 68%Engineering Technology Electronic Engineering Technology 351 0 0 351 100% Engineering Science 264 0 0 264 100% General Engineering Technology 297 39 0 336 88% Math Technology 108 0 0 108 100% Mechanical Engineering Technology 566 0 0 566 100%Mechanical Engineering Engineering Science 957 711 0 1,668 57% Mechanical Engineering 1,336 1,126 0 2,462 54%College of Engineering Total 10,239 2,629 506 13,374 77%

Honors College Honors Honors 0 51 81 132 0%Honors College Total 0 51 81 132 0%

Table 7.9: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH) Generated by Full-Time Faculty Fall 2015(continued from previous page)



Sec

tio

n

7

(continued from previous page)


School of Nursing Nursing Nursing RN 3,574 520 205 4,299 83%School of Nursing Total 3,574 520 205 4,299 83%

College of Science Biology, Geology & Biology 5,443 2,868 0 8,311 65%Environmental Science Environmental Sciences 430 613 0 1,043 41% Geological Sciences 318 258 87 663 48%Chemistry Chemistry 3,834 417 2,703 6,954 55%Health Sciences Pre-Health Science 2,096 1,757 377 4,230 50% Speech & Hearing 505 1,088 225 1,818 28%Mathematics Mathematics 5,744 6,087 1,291 13,122 44%Other Science Developmental Math 843 156 366 1,365 62% Science 63 36 168 267 24%Physics Physics 2,112 1,902 213 4,227 50%Psychology Psychology 2,591 5,303 354 8,248 31%College of Science Total 23,979 20,485 5784 50,248 48% College of Urban Affairs Urban Studies Urban Studies 3,217 3,351 641 7,209 45%College of Urban Affairs Total 3,217 3,351 641 7,209 45%

Undergraduate Studies Undergraduate Studies ASC 153 107 1,086 1,346 11% Business Freshman Orientation 0 0 153 153 0%Undergraduate Studies Total 153 107 1239 1,499 10%

Other Other Air Force 0 0 28 28 0%

Career Services 0 0 132 132 0%

Military Science 0 0 13 13 0%

Study Abroad 0 0 120 120 0%

Other Total 0 293 293 0% 0%

Total SCH 85,424 57,418 11892 154,734 55%

This report includes only the SCH generated by instructors who have a valid I.D. available in the CSU employee database system.

Table 7.9: Percentage of Undergraduate Student Credit Hours (SCH) Generated by Full-Time Faculty Fall 2015


2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Institution Women Minorities Women Minorities Women Minorities Women Minorities Women Minorities

University of Akron 43% 17% 44% 18% 44% 20% 44% 21% 43% 22%Bowling Green State University 48% 11% 47% 12% NA NA 49% 12% 49% 11%University of Cincinnati 39% 17% 39% 18% 39% 17% 39% 17% 40% 17%Cleveland State University 40% 23% 40% 24% 41% 24% 42% 24% 43% 23%Central State University 40% 65% 41% 60% 39% 62% 42% 63% 42% 73%Kent State University 50% 17% 51% 21% 52% 25% 52% 19% 54% 11%Miami University 43% 14% 44% 14% 43% 14% 43% 15% 44% 16%Ohio State University 38% 20% 38% 19% 39% 19% 40% 19% 41% 20%Ohio University 38% 15% 39% 16% 39% 16% 40% 16% 41% 16%Shawnee State University 47% 5% 46% 7% 45% 6% 42% 7% 42% 8%University of Toledo 39% 17% 40% 18% 40% 20% 41% 22% NA NAWright State University 45% 21% 46% 22% 45% 21% 45% 22% 46% 22%Youngstown State University 41% 17% 42% 17% 43% 16% 45% 14% 45% 16%Total 40% 18% 41% 18% 41% 18% 42% 18% 43% 18%Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employee (AM) query - rundate: August 25, 2016. Note: Non-resident aliens as well as individuals whose race and ethnicity was unknown are assumed not to be a minority. Individuals who have two or more races are considered to be a minority. University of Toledo numbers reflect changes for their merger with Medical University of Ohio in 2008.

Table 7.10: Women and Minorities as a Percentage of Full-Time Faculty Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions Fall 2011 - 2015

Table 7.11: Full-Time Faculty as a Percentage of Total Full-Time Employees Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions Fall 2011 - 2015

Institution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

University of Akron 33% 31% 32% 35% 43%Bowling Green State University 40% 41% 38% 40% 37%University of Cincinnati 38% 37% 37% 38% 39%Cleveland State University 34% 34% 34% 34% 39%Central State University 27% 27% 28% 28% 35%Kent State University 31% 30% 31% 30% 34%Miami University 27% 26% 26% 28% 32%Ohio State University 21% 17% 17% 18% 20%Ohio University 31% 30% 30% 30% 34%Shawnee State University 39% 40% 39% 39% 40%University of Toledo 41% 34% 37% 42% NAWright State University 36% 40% 36% 37% 36%Youngstown State University 39% 38% 37% 40% 43%Total 28% 27% 26% 26% 23%

Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employee (AM) query. Run Date: August 26, 2016. Note: Percentage is the total number of full-time faculty divided by the total number of full-time employees. *University of Toledo numbers reflect changes for their merger with Medical University of Ohio.


Sec

tio

n

7

Table 7.12: Rate of Annual Student FTE to Number of Full-Time Faculty Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions Fiscal Years 2011 - 2015

Table 7.13: Student FTE to Full-Time Staff Ratio Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions Main Campuses Only Fall 2011 - 2015

Percent ChangeInstitution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 Year 5 Year

University of Akron 27.4 28.3 27.9 25.4 25.9 1.9% -5.4%Bowling Green State University 19.1 18.8 20.4 20.2 21.5 6.5% 12.5%University of Cincinnati 13.1 13.8 13.6 14.2 14.2 0.0% 8.7%Cleveland State University 26.2 26.6 27.5 27.3 25.8 -5.4% -1.2%Central State University 20.0‡ 22.1 19.9 22.0 17.8 -19.0% -11.1%Kent State University 26.8‡ 27.5 26.5 26.3 26.9 2.4% 0.4%Miami University 20.0 20.1 20.4 19.5 18.9 -3.2% -5.7%Ohio State University 12.7‡ 15.1 13.2 13.5 13.7 1.3% 7.9%Ohio University 26.3‡ 27.5 25.6 25.5 25.5 0.1% -2.8%Shawnee State University 28.2 28.0 27.8 30.0 27.5 -8.3% -2.5%University of Toledo 17.4 18.6‡ 17.0 17.3 NA NA NAWright State University 18.3 16.3‡ 16.4 15.8 16.2 2.8% -11.1%Youngstown State University 28.5 28.2 27.3 25.8 25.8 0.1% -9.3%Total 18.1 17.8 18.5 18.4 20.0 8.3% 10.1%

Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employee (AM) and Course Enrollment queries: run date: September 26, 2016. Note: Ratio equals the annualized student FTE for the fiscal year divided by the number of full-time faculty. University of Toledo numbers reflect changes for their merger with Medical University of Ohio. † Indicates that portions of the data for the year are not available from the institution. ‡ Indicates that unfinalized data has been included in this result.

Percent Change Institution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 Year 5 Year

University of Akron 12.7 12.1 11.9 12.5 13.7 9.3% 7.5%Bowling Green State University 12.0 12.2 11.9 12.5 12.4 -0.8% 3.5%University of Cincinnati 8.2 7.6 8.0 8.2 8.0 -2.3% -2.7%Cleveland State University 12.4 12.8 13.1 12.1 12.7 4.6% 2.2%Central State University 7.6 6.6 7.1 7.3 8.1 11.5% 7.5%Kent State University 11.8† 11.4 11.0 10.8 11.0 2.0% -6.2%Miami University 7.0 7.0 7.2 7.3 7.6 4.3% 8.5%Ohio State University 3.2† 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 -2.6% -15.2%Ohio University 11.3 10.7 10.5 10.1 9.6 -4.8% -15.2%Shawnee State University 18.0 17.7 16.8 16.8 15.7 -6.3% -12.7%University of Toledo 11.2 8.4 8.9 8.4 NA NA NAWright State University 9.7† 9.2 8.6 8.4 8.2 -1.9% -15.4%Youngstown State University 17.0 16.1 15.4 15.4 15.4 0.0% -9.4%Total 7.0 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.1 -3.9% -14.9%

Source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI All Employees (AM) and Course Enrollment (CN) queries - run date: October 17, 2016.* University of Toledo numbers reflect changes for their merger with Medical University of Ohio

Note: † Indicates institutions which had not finalized enrollment data by query date. Ratio equals the student FTE for the term divided by the number of full-time non-faculty employees employed on November 1 of each year.

Sec

tio

n

8

Selected Administrative Centers, Departments

& Offices

8Book of Trends

167Section 8 - Selected Administrative Centers, Departments & Offices

Sec

tio

n

8

Application, Admission, and YieldTable 8.1: University Totals Application Trends Unduplicated for Degree-Seeking Students, Fall 2011 - 2015

Table 8.1a: New FirsT Year UNdergradUaTe applicaTioN TreNd For degree-seekiNg sTUdeNTs, Fall 2011 - 2015

First Year percent change

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 year 5 year

Total Applied 4,838 5,819 6,768 6,407 10,679 67% 121% Admitted 3,059 3,721 4,255 4,272 6,858 61% 124% Enrolled 1,324 1,562 1,727 1,601 1,903 19% 44% Yield 43.3% 42.0% 40.6% 37.5% 27.7%

Table 8.1b: New TraNsFer UNdergradUaTe applicaTioN TreNd For degree-seekiNg sTUdeNTs, Fall 2011 - 2015

Transfer percent change

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 year 5 year

Total Applied 3,198 3,769 4,076 3,904 3,753 -4% 17% Admitted 2,059 2,288 2,488 2,300 2,221 -3% 8% Enrolled 1,358 1,539 1,466 1,406 1,366 -3% 1% Yield 66.0% 67.3% 58.9% 61.1% 61.5%

Table 8.1c: New law applicaTioN TreNd For degree-seekiNg sTUdeNTs, Fall 2011 - 2015

law percent change

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 year 5 year

Total Applied 1,571 1,114 783 560 685 22% -56% Admitted 579 471 384 303 289 -5% -50% Enrolled 149 124 124 135 95 -30% -36% Yield 25.7% 26.3% 32.3% 44.6% 32.9%

Table 8.1d: New gradUaTe applicaTioN TreNds For degree-seekiNg sTUdeNTs, Fall 2011 - 2015

graduate percent change

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 year 5 year

Total Applied 3,973 4,108 4,448 5,196 4,928 -5% 24% Admitted 2,185 2,206 2,087 2,141 2,259 6% 3% Enrolled 1,018 1,079 976 1,206 1,149 -5% 13% Yield 46.6% 48.9% 46.8% 56.3% 50.9%

source: Institutional Research

Notes: Yield is calculated as the percent of those enrolled from the total admitted.


Office of Advancement

CSU FoundationAlumni, friends, faculty, staff, corporations and foundations support Cleveland State University each year with philanthropic gifts to the CSU Foundation. These gifts provide additional resources that are necessary for sustaining a high quality educational and engaged learning experience for CSU students and the University. The CSU Foundation manages an endowment, a collection of hundreds of individually named funds that are invested for growth. Each year, endowment earnings are distributed, providing private support, as determined by donors, for student scholarships, faculty research, academic programs, athletics and more. Through prudent stewardship of donors’ gifts, the CSU Foundation is able to ensure stability for programs and provide scholarships for students.

Table 8.2: CSU Foundation: 5-Year Endowment Growth by College/Division endowment (program giving & scholarship) percent change

college/division 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 Year 5 Year

Business 6,497,561 6,941,913 8,109,456 9,653,444 9,751,200 1% 50%CLASS 2,048,334 2,105,108 2,442,725 2,792,437 3,238,449 16% 58%Education 6,105,603 5,979,224 6,354,353 7,162,761 6,754,110 -6% 11%Engineering 6,360,505 6,861,201 8,039,244 10,073,832 10,681,966 6% 68%Nursing - 205,357 251,899 286,744 260,448 -9% - Science 707,652 760,011 1,030,055 1,335,640 1,321,929 -1% 87%Urban Affairs 4,906,531 5,091,246 5,722,322 6,949,941 6,578,450 -5% 34%Law 8,773,829 9,048,175 10,263,188 11,752,707 11,272,838 -4% 28%Athletics 1,756,498 1,733,176 1,853,272 2,265,390 2,311,366 2% 32%General University 9,396,696 9,567,987 10,502,010 12,424,350 13,327,716 7% 42%Library 819,034 801,651 876,692 983,914 953,282 -3% 16%Office of the President 369,127 400,706 457,870 519,771 446,661 -14% 21%Total endowment $47,741,370 $49,495,755 $55,903,086 $66,200,929 $66,898,415 1% 40%

program giving1 percent change


Business 659,975 684,415 865,238 976,134 945,278 -3% 43%CLASS 503,771 521,181 591,844 654,909 707,491 8% 40%Education 5,260,712 5,147,654 5,401,062 6,065,016 5,688,922 -6% 8%Engineering 1,778,371 1,880,219 2,179,047 2,810,636 2,791,861 -1% 57%Science 256,636 261,279 278,656 321,837 282,027 -12% 10%Urban Affairs 3,436,645 3,459,679 3,887,379 4,524,652 4,202,757 -7% 22%Law 2,331,886 2,388,876 2,721,361 3,157,240 2,825,574 -11% 21%Athletics 40,416 39,064 43,295 48,180 47,236 -2% 17%General University 1,353,675 1,442,663 1,652,205 1,940,912 2,194,458 13% 62%Library 819,034 801,651 876,692 983,914 953,282 -3% 16%Office of the President 369,127 400,706 457,870 519,771 446,661 -14% 21%Total program $16,810,248 $17,027,387 $18,954,649 $22,003,200 $21,085,547 -4% 25%



Sec

tio

n

8

Office of Advancement

philanthropic Highlights: 2015-2016

n ENGAGE: The Campaign for Cleveland State University reached $87 million of its $100 million goal. ENGAGE, CSU’s first-ever comprehensive campaign, supports student success.

n Secured more than $4.2 million for scholarships; the number of endowments increased from 320 to 345.

n Secured $14.1 million in attainment (gifts and pledges) and $11.8 million in cash (gifts and pledge payments).

n Radiance, CSU Realizing the Promise raised $1.1 million for Radiance scholarships, which are awarded primarily to students in good academic standing who are at risk for dropping out of school because of finances and need a few “last dollars” to graduate.

n Secured 58 major gift commitments ($25,000 and up) and an additional 71 gifts from $10,000 to $24,999. Transformational gifts included $5.5 million from the Cleveland Foundation for the NEOMED/CSU Partnership for Urban Health and $1 million from KeyBank Foundation for the KeyBank Scholars Program.

n Raised $55,600 in 24 hours as part of CSU’s third-annual Giving Day.

Table 8.2: CSU Foundation: 5-Year Endowment Growth by College/Division

scholarship percent change


Business 5,837,586 6,257,499 7,244,218 8,677,310 8,805,922 1% 51%CLASS 1,544,563 1,583,927 1,850,881 2,137,529 2,530,958 18% 64%Education 844,891 831,570 953,291 1,097,744 1,065,188 -3% 26%Engineering 4,582,134 4,980,982 5,860,197 7,263,196 7,890,105 9% 72%Nursing - 205,357 251,899 286,744 260,448 -9% - Science 451,016 498,732 751,399 1,013,803 1,039,902 3% 131%Urban Affairs 1,469,886 1,631,567 1,834,943 2,425,288 2,375,693 -2% 62%Law 6,441,943 6,659,299 7,541,827 8,595,467 8,447,264 -2% 31%Athletics 1,716,082 1,694,112 1,809,977 2,217,210 2,264,130 2% 32%General University 8,043,021 8,125,324 8,849,805 10,483,438 11,133,258 6% 38%Total scholarships $30,931,122 $32,468,369 $36,948,437 $44,197,729 $45,812,868 4% 48%ToTal eNdowMeNTs $47,741,370 $49,495,756 $55,903,086 $66,200,929 $66,898,415 1% 40% 1Program giving includes gifts for academic programs, support for colleges, faculty and staff development, technological upgrades, and facilities and equipment.

Some totals for 2012 have been adjusted for this year’s edition of the Book of Trends, and may differ slightly from those reported last year.

source: CSU Controller’s Office and University Advancement.

(continued from previous page)

Table 8.3: CSU Foundation: Endowed Scholarship, Donors & Giving

percent change

endowed: FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 1 Year 5 Year

Chairs 6 6 6 6 7 17% 17%Scholarships 272 281 303 317 337 6% 24%Alumni Donors 3,395 3,621 4,298 4,591 4,357 -5% 28%Total donors 5,265 5,877 6,322 6,748 6,367 -6% 21%Alumni Giving $1,314,620 $1,513,849 $7,422,352 $6,663,921 $2,051,690 -69% 56%Total giving $5,239,065 $6,162,823 $14,179,161 $17,731,954 $11,801,520 -33% 125%source: CSU Office of Advancement


AthleticsTable 8.4: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University by EnrollmentMeN’s sporTs

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-16

enrollment % enrollment % enrollment % enrollment % enrollment %

Baseball 5 5% 5 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Basketball 13 14% 12 13% 13 15% 13 15% 13 14%Fencing 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Golf 7 7% 9 10% 8 9% 8 9% 9 10%Soccer 22 23% 20 21% 18 21% 19 22% 19 21%Swimming & Diving 19 20% 19 20% 19 22% 18 20% 22 24%Tennis 8 8% 8 9% 8 9% 8 9% 7 8%Wrestling 22 23% 21 22% 19 22% 22 25% 22 24%Total Men 96 100% 94 100% 85 100% 88 100% 92 100%cumulative gpa, Males 2.88 2.96 2.99 2.94 3.02

woMeN’s sporTs

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-16

enrollment % enrollment % enrollment % enrollment % enrollment %

Basketball 13 11% 13 11% 12 11% 14 13% 13 11%Cross Country 12 10% 9 8% 12 11% 14 13% 10 8%Fencing 0 0% 0 0% 2 2% 2 2% 2 2%Golf 7 6% 8 7% 7 6% 6 6% 7 6%Soccer 23 20% 22 19% 22 19% 21 19% 24 20%Softball 19 16% 21 18% 16 14% 16 15% 20 17%Swimming & Diving 23 20% 22 19% 22 19% 16 15% 24 20%Tennis 7 6% 8 7% 9 8% 7 6% 8 7%Volleyball 12 10% 12 10% 12 11% 12 11% 12 10%Total women 116 100% 115 100% 114 100% 108 100% 120 100%cumulative gpa, Females 3.26 3.31 3.35 3.33 3.32 Total all athletes 212 209 199 196 212 cumulative gpa, all athletes 3.08 3.16 3.16 3.17 3.20 Note: Enrollment reflects students who received athletic financial aid. GPA reflects fall term. source: CSU Athletics Department

2015-16 athletic department Highlights:• The men’s golf team won its third straight Horizon League

Championship and its seventh league title over the last 11 seasons.

• The volleyball team captured the Horizon League Championship and advanced to the NCAA tournament for the third time in program history.

• A total of 166 student-athletes were honored at the John Konstantinos’s Academic Honors Luncheon for maintaining a cumulative grade point average of 3.0 or better.

• The cross country team was named a USTFCCCA All-Academic Team for the eighth straight season.

• The men’s golf, women’s cross country and indoor/outdoor track and field, and women’s tennis teams all received public recognition by the NCAA for their latest multiyear Academic Progress Rate (APR) scores, posting multiyear

APR’s in the top-10 percent of their respective sport.• Riley Shaw won the EWL heavyweight championship

for the second straight year and advanced to the NCAA Championships along with teammate Sam Wheeler who was the runner-up at 197 pounds at the EWL Championship.

• The wrestling team had a 3.237 grade point average, which was the 11th-highest team GPA in the nation.

• Men’s soccer junior Sergio Manesio and volleyball junior Grace Kauth were named the Horizon League Scholar-Athletes of the Fall season.

• The Cleveland State men’s and women’s swimming and diving teams both earned the 2016 Spring College Swimming Coaches Association of America (CSCAA) Team Scholar All-America Award.

• Junior men’s swimmer Philipp Sikatzki earned All-

American honors at the NCAA Championship after finishing fourth in the 100 butterfly.

• Senior Erica McNew was named the Horizon League Softball Player of the Year after leading the League in batting average (.474), home runs (15) and RBI (51).

• The women’s tennis team captured the Horizon League regular season title for the second time in the last three years.

• Senior Allyson Hackman, sophomores Sophie Kelner and Emily Turski and freshman Rayna Oosterhuis were all named Women’s Golf Coaches Association (WGCA) All-American Scholars for their success in the classroom.

• Junior men’s soccer player Sergio Manesio and sophomore volleyball player Alexis Middlebrooks were named 2016 Arthur Ashe Jr. Sports Scholars by Diverse: Issues in Higher Education.

Table 8.5: Athletic Sports at Cleveland State University 4, 5, and 6 Year Graduation Rate

New Undergraduate First-time, Fall

degree-seeking, 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

First Year athletes enrollment % enrollment % enrollment % enrollment % enrollment %

Total athletes 56 50 62 54 54 Athletes graduated in 4 years 10 18% 19 38% 17 27% 14 26% 15 28%Athletes graduated in 5 years 19 34% 11 22% 14 23% 18 33% 19 35%Athletes graduated in 6 years 2 4% 0 0% 1 2% 3 6% 0 0%Total athletes graduated ≤ 6 Years 31 55% 30 60% 32 52% 35 65% 34 63%


Sec

tio

n

8

Tabl

e 8.

6: S

tate

men

t of

Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res

and

Oth

er C

hang

es

Fisc

al Y

ears

201

1 –

2015

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

perc

ent c

hang

e

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

1

year

5

year

NoN-

oper

aTiN

g iT

eMs

St

uden

t Tui

tion

and

Fees

, Net

14

0,71

3,14

0

76%

14

8,86

9,48

4

75%

15

3,86

9,97

8

74%

15

9,78

9,36

8

74%

15

5,37

3,56

7

78%

-3

%

10%

Fede

ral G

rant

s &

Cont

ract

s 9,

944,

701

5%

10

,584

,556

5%

9,

527,

734

5%

8,

770,

261

4%

7,

533,

873

4%

-1

4%

-24%

Stat

e Gr

ants

& C

ontr

acts

5,

726,

269

3%

8,

973,

341

5%

8,

519,

937

4%

11

,577

,824

5%

2,

721,

558

1%

-7

6%

-52%

Loca

l Gra

nts

& Co

ntra

cts

765,

192

0%

26

3,58

9

0%

689,

022

0%

82

2,17

1

0%

442,

622

0%

-4

6%

-42%

Priv

ate

Gifts

, Gra

nts

& Co

ntra

cts

2,77

2,54

0

1%

2,69

5,37

6

1%

2,71

4,47

1

1%

4,25

0,44

6

2%

3,19

4,95

3

2%

-25%

15

%Sa

les

& Se

r vic

es

4,29

7,70

8

2%

4,52

4,08

3

2%

9,70

3,99

3

5%

7,06

9,79

7

3%

6,26

7,61

3

3%

-11%

46

%Au

xilia

ry E

nter

pris

es

20,8

45,1

90

11%

22

,458

,921

11

%

22,2

40,5

18

11%

23

,450

,596

11

%

22,7

80,0

60

11%

-3

%

9%Ot

her S

ourc

es

500,

246

0%

37

7,83

8

0%

258,

889

0%

1,

171,

455

1%

1,

006,

633

1%

-1

4%

101%

ToTa

l op

eraT

iNg

reVe

NUes

18

5,56

4,98

6 10

0%

198,

747,

188

100%

20

7,52

4,54

2 10

0%

216,

901,

918

100%

19

9,32

0,87

9 10

0%

-8%

7%

oper

aTiN

g eX

peNs

es

In

stru

ctio

n 94

,507

,111

32

%

91,9

32,5

44

33%

96

,849

,118

33

%

99,0

14,2

44

33%

10

0,95

9,71

4

35%

2%

7%

Rese

arch

12

,295

,867

4%

14

,961

,949

5%

13

,159

,579

4%

16

,635

,509

6%

7,

707,

904

3%

-5

4%

-37%

Publ

ic S

ervi

ce

8,19

3,70

1

3%

5,99

7,30

7

2%

7,47

0,47

1

3%

8,19

3,34

4 3%

6,

110,

528

2%

-2

5%

-25%

Acad

emic

Sup

port

23

,531

,908

8%

23

,017

,435

8%

23

,844

,470

8%

25

,135

,935

8%

26

,229

,750

9%

4%

11

%St

uden

t Ser

vice

s 20

,953

,129

7%

17

,787

,324

6%

19

,921

,498

7%

19

,692

,624

7%

19

,174

,987

7%

-3

%

-8%

Inst

itutio

nal S

uppo

rt

30,8

56,8

17

11%

27

,057

,901

10

%

32,6

19,8

75

11%

30

,924

,222

10

%

28,8

89,5

82

10%

-7

%

-6%

Oper

atio

n &

Mai

nten

ance

of P

lant

26

,045

,710

9%

27

,975

,181

10

%

28,2

23,4

85

10%

28

,700

,394

10

%

27,8

68,4

95

10%

-3

%

7%Sc

hola

rshi

ps a

nd F

ello

wsh

ips

19,8

42,1

44

7%

18,0

18,6

04

6%

15,8

87,1

29

5%

14,3

81,9

02

5%

15,9

41,2

48

5%

11%

-2

0%Au

xilia

ry E

nter

pris

es

31,2

00,5

32

11%

29

,152

,533

10

%

31,5

94,1

98

11%

32

,448

,832

11

%

32,8

84,0

41

11%

1%

5%

Depr

ecia

tion

and

Amor

tizat

ion

24,8

18,4

43

8%

24,2

03,8

24

9%

26,5

50,7

15

9%

26,6

57,8

57

9%

26,6

66,4

34

9%

0%

7%T o

Tal

oper

aTiN

g e X

peNs

es

292,

245,

362

100%

28

0,10

4,60

2 10

0%

296,

120,

538

100%

30

1,78

4,86

3 10

0%

292,

432,

683

100%

-3

%

0%No

Nope

raTi

Ng iT

eMs

St

ate

Appr

opria

tions

6

3,54

4,55

5

55%

6

4,43

4,74

7

69%

6

5,06

1,74

5

65%

6

8,07

9,52

0

62%

7

1,01

8,13

5

68%

4%

12

%Fe

dera

l App

ropr

iatio

ns

10,

567,

874

9%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

0%

-

-Fe

dera

l Gra

nts

and

Cont

ract

s 2

6,12

9,06

1

22%

2

3,45

3,21

7

25%

2

2,18

6,00

1

22%

2

2,42

2,63

7

20%

2

1,67

9,49

4

21%

-3

%

-17%

Stat

e Gr

ants

and

Con

trac

ts

3,3

92,4

98

3%

2,6

46,3

37

3%

3,5

33,9

38

4%

1,4

13,3

12

1%

3,9

37,6

36

4%

179%

16

%Gi

fts

4,3

90,0

82

4%

7,1

96,6

32

8%

7,3

06,3

97

7%

13,

841,

028

13

%

15,

071,

455

14

%

9%

243%

Inve

stm

ent I

ncom

e 1

3,17

9,15

8

11%

1

,048

,743

1%

9

,395

,509

9%

1

1,85

0,70

9

11%

5

45,5

19

1%

-95%

-9

6%In

tere

st o

n De

bt

(9,4

60,1

96)

-8%

(9

,034

,400

) -1

0%

(7,8

61,7

12)

-8%

(7

,971

,449

) -7

%

(7,9

09,7

04)

-8%

-1

%

-16%

Stat

e Ca

pita

l App

ropr

iatio

ns

4,6

15,4

39

4%

3,1

79,8

23

3%

335

,459

0%

2

37,0

13

0%

59,

621

0%

-7

5%

-99%

Capi

tal G

ifts

-

- -

-

-

- -

-

-

- -

-Ot

her N

onop

erat

ing

Item

s -

-

-

- -

-

-

- -

-

- -

T oTa

l No

Nope

raTi

Ng iT

eMs

116,

358,

471

100%

92

,925

,099

10

0%

99,9

57,3

37

100%

10

9,87

2,77

0 10

0%

104,

402,

156

100%

-5

%

-10%

(Con

tinue

d on

nex

t pag

e)

Fina

nce


Tabl

e 8.

6:

Stat

emen

t of

Rev

enue

s, E

xpen

ditu

res

and

Oth

er C

hang

es

Fisc

al Y

ears

201

1 –

2015

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

perc

ent c

hang

e

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

$

am

ount

%

1-

year

5-

year

NeT

asse

Ts a

T eN

d oF

Yea

r

Incr

ease

in N

et A

sset

s 9

,678

,095

3%

1

1,56

7,68

5

3%

11,

361,

341

3%

2

4,98

9,82

5

6%

11,

290,

352

5%

-5

5%

17%

Net A

sset

s at

Beg

inni

ng o

f Yea

r -

-

-

- 3

58,3

04,8

98

- 3

67,6

77,9

83

- 3

92,6

67,8

08

- 7%

-

Rest

atem

ent

FY13

*, FY

15**

-

-

-

- (1

,988

,256

) -

-

- (1

80,5

22,3

93)

- -

-Ne

t Ass

ets

at B

egin

ning

of Y

ear

337

,059

,118

97

%

346

,737

,213

97

%

356

,316

,642

97

%

367

,677

,983

94

%

212

,145

,415

95

%

-42%

-3

7%Ne

T as

seTs

aT

eNd

oF Y

ear

346,

737,

213

100%

35

8,30

4,89

8 10

0%

367,

677,

983

100%

39

2,66

7,80

8 10

0%

223,

435,

767

100%

-4

3%

-36%

sour

ce:

CSU

Cont

rolle

r’s O

ffice

* Ch

ange

in A

ccou

ntin

g Pr

inci

pal:

Effe

ctive

with

the

fisca

l yea

r end

ed 6

/30/

13 th

e Un

ivers

ity a

dopt

ed G

ASB

65 re

sulti

ng in

a re

duct

ion

of B

egin

ning

Net

Ass

ets

of $

1,98

8,25

6.

**

Cha

nge

in A

ccou

ntin

g Pr

inci

pal:

Effe

ctive

with

the

fisca

l yea

r end

ed 6

/30/

15 th

e Un

ivers

ity a

dopt

ed G

ASB

68 re

sulti

ng in

a re

duct

ion

of B

egin

ning

Net

Ass

ets

of $

180,

522,

393.

(Con

tinue

d fro

m p

revio

us p

age)

Figu

re 8

.6a:

Tot

al R

even

ues

- FY

201

1 -

2015

Figu

re 8

.6b:

Ope

rati

ng E

xpen

ses

- FY

201

1 -

2015

Fina

nce


Sec

tio

n

8

FinanceTable 8.7: Public Service Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions - Main Campuses Only Fiscal Years 2011 - 2015

institution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

University of Akron 3.6% 3.1% 2.8% 2.0% 1.5%

Bowling Green State University 1.7% 1.4% 1.2% 1.3% 1.2%

University of Cincinnati 5.5% 5.8% 5.9% 6.3% 5.9%

cleveland state University 2.9% 2.2% 2.6% 2.8% 2.1%

Central State University 2.9% 4.4% 4.0% 3.5% 3.9%

Kent State University 2.8% 2.7% 2.4% 2.4% 2.1%

Miami University 0.4% 0.2% 0.4% 0.5% 0.6%

Ohio State University 2.5% 2.4% 2.3% 2.8% 3.0%

Ohio University 4.4% 4.4% 4.2% 4.1% 3.9%

Shawnee State University 4.0% 2.9% 3.1% 3.5% 3.2%

University of Toledo 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0%

Wright State University 3.2% 3.7% 3.8% 4.1% 4.2%

Youngstown State University 2.3% 2.6% 2.3% 2.2% 2.3%

Totals 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.9% 2.9%

source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries. Run Date: August 17, 2016. Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for public service for the fiscal year divided by the total expenditures.

Table 8.8: Benefit Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Funding Unit Expenditures Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions - Main Campuses Only Fiscal Years 2011 - 2015

institution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

University of Akron 16.1% 15.9% 27.2% 28.9% 29.7%Bowling Green State University 13.0% 14.4% 16.9% 14.7% 14.2%University of Cincinnati 15.4% 16.2% 17.0% 17.1% 16.6%cleveland state University 15.7% 15.1% 14.6% 15.1% 15.0%Central State University 27.3% 25.6% 26.9% 26.5% 25.8%Kent State University 12.4% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.6%Miami University 18.9% 17.8% 18.6% 17.2% 19.4%Ohio State University 23.6% 26.6% 29.1% 29.1% 29.2%Ohio University 26.2% 23.5% 23.7% 13.0% 17.9%Shawnee State University 27.1% 25.5% 26.6% 25.8% 26.2%University of Toledo 17.3% 17.5% 17.5% 17.4% 17.7%Wright State University 14.8% 12.0% 13.4% 16.0% 15.1%Youngstown State University 20.9% 23.0% 20.9% 17.2% NATotals 19.6% 20.5% 22.3% 21.4% 22.1%

source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Funding Unit Expenditures (FX) queries. Rundate: August 17, 2016. Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for benefits during the fiscal year divided by total funding unit expenditures.


Table 8.9: Scholarship & Fellowship Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Expenditures Selected Ohio 4-Year Institutions - Main Campuses Only Fiscal Years 2011 - 2015

institution 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

University of Akron 15.5% 14.7% 14.6% 14.1% 14.4%Bowling Green State University 22.1% 20.0% 18.6% 18.6% 18.6%University of Cincinnati 13.4% 13.4% 13.3% 13.2% 13.5%cleveland state University 13.0% 12.6% 12.5% 11.9% 13.2%Central State University 24.0% 22.5% 20.6% 20.9% 20.9%Kent State University 17.8% 17.2% 16.0% 16.1% 16.2%Miami University 14.6% 15.8% 16.6% 16.9% 17.3%Ohio State University 5.7% 5.8% 5.9% 5.9% 5.8%Ohio University 13.7% 12.4% 12.1% 11.9% 11.0%Shawnee State University 26.8% 26.4% 25.3% 25.7% 24.8%University of Toledo 12.3% 11.9% 11.3% 11.4% 11.2%Wright State University 15.6% 14.2% 14.3% 14.9% 15.4%Youngstown State University 20.6% 20.7% 19.7% 18.9% 18.8%Totals 11.0% 10.8% 10.5% 10.4% 10.3%source: The Ohio Board of Regents HEI Current Fund Expenditures (CF) queries. Run Date: August 23, 2016.

Note: Percentage equals the expenditures for scholarships and fellowships divided by total expenditures.

Finance

Cleveland State University’s Financial Aid ProgramsFinancial aid is money that is provided to help bridge the gap between students’ own resources and the amount of money needed to pay the cost of attending college. Approximately 68 percent of Cleveland State’s students receive some form of financial assistance. The University participates in or administers all of the major federal and state grant and loan programs. In addition, Cleveland State provides University grants and scholarships.

Table 8.10: Financial Aid Awards to Undergraduate Students by Full-Time/Part-Time Status, Average Aid Package and Academic Year

academic Year percent change

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1 year 5 year

Full-time students with Financial aid: Enrollment 6,647 6,434 6,892 6,428 6,547 2% -2%Average Aid Package $8,755 $8,821 $8,707 $8,935 $8,839 -1% 1% part-time students with Financial aid: Enrollment 1,292 1,631 1,259 1,471 1,417 -4% 10%Average Aid Package $6,652 $5,896 $6,566 $6,660 $6,544 -2% -2%

source: Common Data Set, H2-row D and row J

Financial aid reported reflects awards to undergraduates enrolled in the fall term of the academic year. Although the university awards a substantial amount of financial aid to additional students, this data reflects a particular point in time by using standard figures as defined by IPEDS (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/) and the Common Data Set (www.commondataset.org).

Financial Aid Office


Sec

tio

n

8

Table 8.11: Financial Aid Awards Fall Cohort, Full-Time, First-Time, Degree-Seeking Undergraduate Students

percent change

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 1 year 5 year

Federal grants: Enrollment 624 690 818 861 727 -16% 17% Average Aid Package $5,831 $4,359 $4,539 $4,604 $4,629 1% -21%state grants: Enrollment 481 506 611 645 530 -18% 10% Average Aid Package $959 $823 $935 $1,087 $1,125 3% 17%scholarships/institutional grants: Enrollment 561 618 684 706 622 -12% 11% Average Aid Package $4,300 $5,155 $5,442 $5,325 $5,258 -1% 22%Federal student loans: Enrollment 799 919 1,063 1,189 1,021 -14% 28% Average Aid Package $5,492 $5,772 $5,644 $5,814 $6,074 4% 11% prior Year cohort N=1,148 N=1,328 N=1,531 N=1,729 N=1,562 source: IPEDS Financial Aid Survey (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/)

Financial aid reported reflects awards to undergraduates enrolled in the fall term of the academic year. Although the university awards a substantial amount of financial aid to additional students, this data reflects

a particular point in time by using standard figures as defined by IPEDS (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/) and the Common Data Set (www.commondataset.org).

Table 8.12: Financial Aid Awards to Fall Term Undergraduate Students

percent change

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 1 year 5 year

Federal Grants $24,562,122 $22,854,234 $23,390,675 $22,928,474 $22,387,513 -2% -9%

State Grants $3,033,671 $3,940,423 $4,372,629 $4,559,067 $5,543,166 22% 83%

Institutional Grants/Scholarships $5,698,155 $7,334,909 $7,334,092 $6,941,713 $10,172,591 47% 79%

Athletic Grants $2,554,462 $2,610,354 $2,602,035 $2,626,103 $2,724,128 4% 7%

Federal Student Loans and $65,273,792 $66,171,387 $65,071,270 $62,856,104 $59,932,183 -5% -8%Federal Work StudyTotal $101,122,202 $102,911,307 $102,770,701 $99,911,461 $100,759,581 1% 0%source: Common Data Set, H1 (based on estimated award year 2015-2016)



Table 8.13: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package

percent change

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 1 year 5 year

Full-time students with Financial aid: Enrollment 528 593 545 544 526 -3.3% -0.4% Average Aid Package $18,708 $20,106 $21,336 $21,549 $21,875 1.5% 16.9%part-time students with Financial aid: Enrollment 2044 2033 2004 1833 1756 -4.2% -14.1% Average Aid Package $15,220 $15,089 $15,880 $15,757 $16,119 2.3% 5.9%

source: CSU Financial Aid Office

Table 8.14: Graduate Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid Fall 2011 - 2015

percent change

Types of Financial aid 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 1 year 5 year

State Fellowship $134,297 $92,439 $55,072 $73,798 $83,618 13.3% -37.7%Scholarships/Institutional Grants $4,454,489 $4,300,000 $5,074,831 $4,079,315 $4,100,650 0.5% -7.9%Non-Institutional Assistance $411,982 $315,577 $308,971 $502,041 $646,576 28.8% 56.9%Federal Student Loans and $35,861,289 $37,801,004 $37,943,017 $35,900,446 $34,920,044 -2.7% -2.6% Federal Work Study (FWS)source: CSU Financial Aid Office

Table 8.15: Law Student Financial Aid Awards Full-Time/Part-Time Status and Average Aid Package

percent change

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 1 year 5 year

Full-time students with Financial aid: Enrollment 420 391 345 297 284 -4.4% -32.4% Average Aid Package $29,734 $31,387 $31,547 $32,790 $34,124 4.1% 14.8%part-time students with Financial aid: Enrollment 133 122 92 102 101 9.8% -21.1% Average Aid Package $23,378 $24,353 $27,551 $27,039 $28,117 2.1% 23.8%source: CSU Financial Aid Office

See notes at the end of Financial Aid Section

Table 8.16: Law Student Financial Aid Awards by Types of Financial Aid Fall 2011 - 2015

percent change

Types of Financial aid 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 1 year 5 year

State Fellowship $0 $0 $0 0 0 - -Scholarships/Institutional Grants $1,941,719 $1,959,025 $2,096,603 2,543,201 3,516,730 38.3% 81.1%Non-Institutional Assistance $88,912 $66,819 $26,340 $66,858 $47,281 -29.3% -46.8%Federal Student Loans and $13,567,000 $13,217,639 $11,295,287 $9,886,606 $8,967,146 -9.3% -33.9% Federal Work Study (FWS)

source: CSU Financial Aid Office

See notes at the end of Financial Aid Section



Sec

tio

n

8

Table 8.17: Undergraduate Cost of Attendance (COA)

academic Year

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Tuition/Fees $8,660 $9,002 $9,316 $9,498 $9,688 $9,848Books and Supplies $800 $800 $800 $800 $800 $800Room/Board $9,470 $11,842 $11,662 $11,858 $12,100 $12,464Personal/Miscellaneous $2,500 $2,500 $1,700 $1,700 $1,700 $1,700Transportation $1,800 $1,800 $1,460 $1,460 $1,726 $1,740Loan Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $72 $72Total $23,230 $25,944 $24,938 $25,316 $26,086 $26,624source: CSU Financial Aid Office

Table 8.18: Annualized Full-Time Undergraduate Tuition & Fees for Selected Main Campuses of Ohio 4-Year Institutions 2015

University Main campuses in-state out-of-state

Bowling Green State University $10,590 $18,126

cleveland state University $9,696 $12,938

Kent State University $10,012 $18,212

Miami University $14,013 $30,713

Ohio State University $10,037 $27,365

Ohio University $10,602 $19,500

University of Akron $9,920 $18,802

University of Cincinnati $11,000 $26,334

University of Toledo $9,242 $18,580

Youngstown State University $8,087 $14,087

source: Data from Ohio Board of Regents Fall 2015 Survey of Student Charges for Academic Year 2015-2016https://www.ohiohighered.org/sites/ohiohighered.org/files/uploads/data/statistical-profiles/tuition-finaid/FY16%20Tuition%20and%20Fees%20Survey_final_1.pdf



Financial Aid OfficeTable 8.19: Award of Financial Aid at Ohio’s Public Title lV Postsecondary Institutions Percent of First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking Students Receiving Aid Average Award Amounts, Academic Year 2013 - 2014

any grant Federal grants state grants institutions grants Federal and other loans

institution any aid % % avg. grant $ % avg. grant $ % avg. grant $ % avg. grant $ % avg. grant $

Bowling Green State University 95% 83% $6,809 35% $4,198 21% $1,217 70% $5,603 69% $7,232

Central State University 91% 91% $7,647 80% $5,606 24% $241 57% $4,292 78% $7,262

cleveland state University 89% 73% $6,670 50% $4,604 37% $1,087 41% $5,325 69% $6,479

Kent State University 94% 83% $6,564 35% $4,445 23% $1,143 75% $4,784 69% $7,540

Miami University 78% 66% $10,055 12% $4,526 5% $910 64% $9,546 39% $7,707

Ohio State University 86% 79% $9,318 18% $4,268 11% $1,298 78% $8,174 44% $7,182

Ohio University 87% 70% $5,893 27% $4,194 18% $989 68% $4,127 63% $7,375

Shawnee State University 94% 79% $4,896 59% $4,278 46% $813 34% $2,885 73% $7,531

University of Akron 91% 76% $6,036 43% $4,400 33% $954 47% $5,127 65% $7,369

University of Cincinnati 84% 59% $6,917 23% $4,904 14% $1,133 54% $5,169 58% $6,796

University of Toledo 95% 94% $7,563 41% $4,815 27% $1,152 85% $5,653 63% $6,565

Wright State University 89% 80% $6,044 40% $4,649 34% $1,338 67% $3,705 62% $7,081

Youngstown State University 96% 71% $7,106 56% $4,656 43% $1,038 45% $4,476 68% $6,061

University Main campuses 90% 77% $7,040 40% $4,580 26% $1,024 60% $5,297 63% $7,091

source: https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/Data.aspx Data retrieved August 9, 2016.

NotesThe undergraduate financial aid reported reflects awards to undergraduate students enrolled in the fall semester of the academic year. The university awards financial aid on a continuous basis throughout the academic year. However, this data reflects a specific point and time as defined by IPEDS http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter and the Common Data Set (www.commondataset.org), generally accepted as the 15th day of fall semester.

For financial aid calculations; full-time undergraduate, graduate and law students are those enrolled for 12 or more credit hours. Part-time undergraduate students are enrolled for 11 or fewer credit hours. Part-time graduate and law student enrollment ranges from 6 to 11 credit hours.

The “Cost of Attendance” tables reflect the estimated average cost of attendance for a full-time, in-state student attending CSU for two (2) semesters during the academic year, and includes estimated tuition and fee charges, books, allowances for room and board, transportation and personal/miscellaneous.

Types of Financial AidFederal grants: Pell Grant, Supplemental Opportunity Educational Grant (SEOG). TEACH Grant.

state grants for Undergraduates: Ohio College Opportunity Grant (OCOG) and Other State tuition grant programs.

state aid for graduate/law students: Graduate and Professional Fellowship.

scholarship/institutional grants for Undergraduates: Refer to http://www.csuohio.edu/enrollmentservices/financialaid/scholarships.

scholarship/institutional grants for graduate/law students: Includes Graduate Assistantships, Tuition Waiver and Scholarships.

Non-institutional aid: Assistance awarded from external agencies.

Federal student loans: Stafford subsidized/unsubsidized and Federal Perkins loans.

Fws: A federally-funded student employment program established to assist students through part-time, on-campus positions or off-campus community service positions.



Sec

tio

n

8

Center for International Services & Programs

International ServicesThe Center for International Services & Programs (CISP) seeks to build a globally oriented, metropolitan university community where students, faculty and staff gain and share international knowledge and experience. Established in 1996 as a separate university entity and now a part of the Office of the Provost, the Center provides CSU international students and visitors with a wide array of support services to help them achieve a positive learning experience while in the United States and Ohio. A second focus of the Center is supporting and facilitating education abroad opportunities for CSU students. This is accomplished by supporting Faculty-led (short term) courses and programs, assisting students in identifying education abroad options, administering scholarships and other related education abroad initiatives. A third area of focus is to facilitate, develop, and support international academic initiatives within each department and college, including faculty Fulbright Program participation. A full description of Center services and programs can be found at: http://www.csuohio.edu/international

Table 8.20: CSU Fulbright Scholar Awards 1973-2016


Year scholar countries/regions Visited

1973-1989 14 1990-1991 1 Portugal1992-1993 2 Hungary, Czechoslovakia1993-1994 3 India, Ethiopia, China1994-1995 2 Salvador, Ethiopia1995-1996 1 China1997-1998 4 Kenya, Nigeria, Japan, Lithuania1998-1999 5 Kenya, Nigeria, Russia, Germany, Norway1999-2000 4 Kyrgyzstan, India, Germany2000-2001 3 Sri Lanka, Germany, Brazil2001-2002 1 Israel2002-2003 6 Botswana, Zambia, Uganda, India, Nepal, Russia2003-2004 4 Croatia, Guatemala, South Africa2004-2005 2 Bulgaria, United Arab Emirates2005-2006 6 Morocco, South Africa, Zambia, Latvia, Taiwan2006-2007 1 Kyrgyzstan2007-2008 2 Nepal, Sri Lanka2008-2009 4 Argentina, Chile, Nepal, Slovakia2009-2010 2 Australia, Nigeria2010-2011 7 Costa Rica, Finland, India, Kenya, Taiwan, Turkey2011-2012 2 Columbia, Turkey2012-2013 6 Azerbaijan, South Africa, Montenegro, India, Taiwan, Turkey2013-2014 1 Israel2014-2015 3 Switzerland, India, Jordan2015-2016 1 United Kingdom ToTal 87

source: Center for International Services & Programs


college international initiatives activities

Table 8.21: Cleveland State University International Initiatives

The College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (CLASS)

Faculty-led Programs Abroad Faculty-led programs were delivered in Spain and France.

The Monte Ahuja College of Business

Faculty-led Programs Abroad Faculty-led programs were delivered in the UK and Spain.

Visiting Faculty Hosted Fulbright and Kosciuszko fellows.

The School of Nursing Student Organization Volunteer Activities

Student Nurses Association members engaged in a service-learning program in the Dominican Republic.

The Department of Athletics

Teams Competition The Men’s basketball team engaged in international tournament competition in Mexico.

The Confucius Institute Language and Cultural Programs Delivered programming in Chinese Language K-12 Instruction throughout the greater Cleveland area; facilitated the placement of 6 Chinese language teachers with partner schools in the Northeast Ohio region.

The Division of Enrollment Services

International Agreement Development

Facilitated academic relationships with ISEC (Dongfang International Center for Educational Exchange), Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, and Hubei Polytechnic University.


Sec

tio

n

8

Table 8.22: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall & Spring) and Program Type

percent change

program Type 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1 year 5 year

Faculty Led 167 168 171 111 60 -46% -64%Exchange 4 3 5 4 4 0% 0%Internship 4 4 1 4 3 -25% -25%Independent 28 18 21 24 37 54% 32%ToTal 203 193 198 143 104 -27% -49%*No longer administered through Cleveland State (moved to the University of Arkansas summer 2007)

Table 8.23: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall & Spring) and College

percent change

college 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1 year 5 year

Business 131 122 133 93 54 -42% -59%CLASS 41 51 43 36 29 -19% -29%Science 8 17 16 11 12 9% 50%Education 11 4 3 1 2 100% -82%Engineering 5 2 4 3 6 100% 20%Urban 4 2 - 2 4 100% 0%Law 5 - 1 - - - -100%ToTal 205 198 200 146 107 -27% -48% Note: Includes duplicate counts for students who were double majors across two different colleges.

Table 8.24: Study Abroad Student Headcount by Academic Year (Summer, Fall & Spring) and Course Level

percent change

course level 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 1 year 5 year

Undergraduate 77 114 99 75 68 -9% -12%Graduate 121 79 98 67 36 -46% -70%Law 5 - 1 - - - -100%ToTal 203 193 198 142 104 -27% -49%source: Center for International Services & Programs



country institution Type of linkage(s)

argentina Universidad Nacional de Tucumen Memorandum of Understanding

china Dongfang International Center for Educational Exchange Dual-degree/Direct Enrollment Program

china Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology Dual-degree

china Hubei Polytechnic Univeristy Dual-degree

china Capital University of Economics and Business Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

china Guangzi Teachers Education University Dual Degree Program - Master of Science in Chemistry Memorandum of Understanding Direct Enrollment Program

china Northeast Normal University Memorandum of Understanding

china Jilin University Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Program Direct Enrollment Program

china Nanjing Normal University Memorandum of Understanding Direct Enrollment Agreement

china Shanghai Dianji University Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

china South China University of Technology, Sino-U.S. College Memorandum of Understanding Dual Degree Program 2+2 Program

china Southwest University of Political Science and Law Memorandum of Understanding

china Confucius Institute (HANBAN) Memorandum of Understanding

France Ecole Superieure de Commerce de Clermont-Ferrand Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

France Universite de Rouen Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

germany Hochschule Offenburg, University of Applied Sciences Memorandum of Understanding

Hungary Hungarian-American Commission for Educational Exchange (Fulbright) Memorandum of Understanding

india International School of Engineering (INSOFE) Direct Enrollment Program

iraq Higher Committee for Education Development, Government of Iraq Memorandum of Understanding and the State of Ohio Board of Regents Direct Enrollment Program

ireland University of Ulster Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

ireland University of Limerick Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

israel University of Haifa Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

israel Tel Aviv University Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

kenya Maseno University Memorandum of Understanding Grant-funded Partnership Agreement

lebanon American University of Science and Technology Memorandum of Understanding

poland Gdansk University of Technology Memorandum of Understanding Univesity of Warsaw Memorandum of Understanding

south korea Chung-Ang University Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement Direct Enrollment Progam

serbia University of Belgrade Memorandum of Understanding University of Novi Sad Memorandum of Understanding

slovenia Republic of Slovenia Memorandum of Understanding University of Ljubljana Memorandum of Understanding Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

south africa University of the Free State Student Hosting Agreement w/Leadership for Change progam

United kingdom Buckingham New University Memorandum of Understanding

United kingdom University of Sunderland Reciprocal Student Exchange Agreement

source: Source: Center for International Services and Programs. For a complete list of historical international partnerships, please contact the Center for International Services & Programs.

Table 8.25: International Partnerships - Active and In Development (alphabetical by country)



Sec

tio

n

8

Office of the University Architect

Notes building code building Year acquired Total gross square Feet

AA Advance Manufacturing Annex 1993 8,213 AC Parker Hannifin Administration Center 2007 37,610[3], [5], [8] AG Art Gallery 2012 17,519 BU Business College 1998 126,245[4] CB Chester Building 1970 109,728[5] CE Cole Center *CMSD Campus International School 1990 56,653 CG Central Garage 1979 269,594[5] CM Magnet Building (Magnet, Ceramics & Scuplture) 1994 82,470 CS Campus Safety 2004 25,056[3], [5], [7] EC Euclid Commons Complex Buildings 1-4 2010 225,811 EG East Garage 2006 124,300 FH Fenn Hall 1964 195,779 FL Field Locker Building 1985 2,194 FS Field Service Building 1985 1,305 FT Fenn Tower 1964 188,746 HS Health Sciences 1998 23,654[5] IM Center for Innovations in Medical Professions 2015 103,295 JH Julka Hall 2010 104,747 KF Krensler Field Dome (protective structure up from Oct-Apr) 2005 99,035[5] LA Langston Court 2012 NA LB Law Building 1977 118,438[5] LL Law Library 1997 111,870[3], [5], [8] MB Middough Building 2011 303,845[2] MC Main Classroom Building 1970 386,489 MM Mather Mansion 1967 43,938 MU Music & Communication Building 1988 151,533 PA Plant Annex Building 1985 8,579 PE Physical Education 1973 201,860[3], [7] PG Prospect Garage 2010 97,489 PH Parker Hannifin Hall 1984 27,252 PS Plant Services 1970 134,590[7] PR Presidents Residence on the 9’s 2015 1,817[5] RC Recreation Center 2006 135,167 RT Rhodes Tower 1971 493,968[1], [5] RW Rhodes West * CMSD STEMM High School --- SC Student Center 2010 160,677[3], [7] SG South Garage 2010 208,000 SI Science Building 1969 171,242 SR Science and Research Center 1978 142,479[11] ST Stephanie Tubbs Jones Transit Center 2010 NA[3], [10] TC Trinity Commons 2013 1,185[3], [5], [9] UN Union Building 2011 84,688 UR Urban College 2000 87,792 WA Wallingford 2008 8,916 WG University West Garage 1996 199,599[5] WO Wolstein Center 1989 289,000[3] WST West Center Campus Extension 2003 9,607

grand Total 5,381,974

Table 8.26 Cleveland State University Fall 2015 Building Inventory

Notes:[1] RW - Rhodes West designation is used for way finding. This space is included in Rhodes Tower totals.[2] Construction/Renovation/Vacancy[3] Leased spaces[4] Some Vacancy- Planned Demolition

[5] Includes Some Non-Institutional Uses [6] Building Name Change[7] Owned or leased by Euclid Avenue Housing Development Corporation [8] Owned by Playhouse Square Development Corporation[9] Owned by Liberty Development Corporation

[10] Owned by Trinity Diocese[11] Owned by RTA Regional Transit Authority


AccreditationCleveland State University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, a commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA).

college

business

education and

Human services

engineering

law

liberal arts and

social sciences

Nursing

sciences and Health professions

Urban

Bachelor of Business Administration

Master of Business Administration

Doctor of Business Administration

Master of Labor Relations & Human Resources

Accounting (undergraduate & graduate)

College of Education and Human Services

Community Agency Counseling and School Counseling

Master of Public Health

Doctor of Urban Education in Counseling Psychology

Chemical, Civil, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering (undergraduate)

Electronic Engineering Technology

Law

Music

Bachelor of Social Work

Master of Social Work

Nursing (undergraduate)

Nursing (graduate)

Chemistry (undergraduate)

Doctor of Clinical/ Bioanalytical Chemistry

Master of Occupational Therapy

Doctor of Physical Therapy

Psychology Specialist (School Psychology)

Master of Speech Pathology and Audiology

Graduate Academic Program

Graduate Clinical Program

Master of Public Administration

Master of Urban Planning, Design, and Development

AACSB International, The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

AACSB International, The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

The National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) and approved by the Ohio Department of Education

Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP)

Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)

American Psychological Association (APA)

Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (EAC/ABET)

Technology Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (TAC/ABET)

American Bar Association and member of the Association of American Law Schools

National Association of Schools of Music

Council of Social Work Education (CSWE)

Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and approved by the Ohio Board of Nursing

Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE)

American Chemical Society

Commission on Accreditation in Clinical Chemistry (ComACC)

Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education

Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education

National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) and NCATE

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)

ASHA Council on Academic Accreditation (CAA)

ASHA Professional Services Board (PSB)

National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA)

Planning Accreditation Board

degree/program accreditation


Sec

tio

n

8

List of College Acronyms and Abbreviations

Monte Ahuja College of Business Administration: College of Business, Business, Bus

College of Education and Human Services: COEHS, College of Education, Education, Edu

Washkewicz College of Engineering: College of Engineering, Engineering, Egr

College of Graduate Studies: Graduate Studies

Cleveland-Marshall College of Law: Law

College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences: CLASS

School of Nursing: Nursing

College of Sciences and Health Professions: COSHP, Science

Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs: College of Urban Affairs, Urban Affairs, Urban

Other Acronyms and Abbreviations

CIP: Classification of Instructional Program

EEO6: Equal Employment Opportunity

FTE: Full-Time Equivalent (Student Credit Hour/15)

GPA: Grade Point Average

IPEDS: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System

N/A: Not applicable or Not available

OBOR: Ohio Board of Regents

SCH: Student Credit Hour


Book of Trends 2016http://www.csuohio.edu/offices/iraa/onlineBookoftrends.html

The Book of Trends (BOT) 2016 represents the continuing commitment of the Office of Institutional Research and Analysis (IRA) to present updated information about Cleveland State University (CSU). A variety of tables and charts provide trend information over a five-year period as well as some key attributes and characteristics of the University for the most recently completed academic year.

The purpose of this publication is to provide readers with frequently requested statistical information used in planning, reporting, and assessment. In order to serve the campus community more effectively, we welcome suggestions and comments.

1. The student information presented in the Book of Trends 2016 is based on the Semester Census files used for Ohio Board of Regents (OBOR) reports unless specifically noted from a different data source.

2. The various Deans’ offices provided IRA with a set of grant/highlight information used to produce Table 4.13. IRA limited these selections in order to meet space requirements. This table is not intended to be a comprehensive listing, but merely to reflect some of the interesting activities of our faculty, staff and students.

3. Each year we attempt to provide comparative data to other colleges and universities in Ohio. These comparisons are typically centered on information available from the Ohio Board of Regents’ Higher Education Information System (HEI) https://www.ohiohigheredjobs.org/hei. At the time of publication a few of the tables normally presented here were not available due to some schools updating prior years’ data, or changes to the HEI system. Please be aware that the HEI tables presented in this year’s book represent various states of completion:a. The data may be complete for the reporting year and can be used accordingly.b. The data may be complete for most institutions, but a few may be unfinalized, in which case only finalized ones are reported or

in some cases unfinalized numbers are included but footnoted as such.c. In some cases many schools had unfinalized the type of data being reviewed and in those cases we have simply reproduced the

prior year’s data with appropriate titles and footnotes.

Note: Based on feedback received from the campus community, we have removed some selected tables from the Book of Trends. If you require data from any of these missing tables, please contact our office and we can provide you with the requisite information.

Please direct questions and/or suggestions to 216-687-4700. The entire Book of Trends series is available online on the IRA website (http://www.csuohio.edu/offices/iraa/bot/bookoftrends.html).

We encourage you to reference the web version of the Book of Trends because we can easily make changes/updates if necessary. By the same token, if a URL is provided in the book such as the ones linked to Research Centers & Institutes, the Ohio Board of Regents, etc., we encourage you to refer to the linked site for the most up-to-date information.

We would like to take this opportunity to thank all members of the campus community for their support and contributions to this publication.

office of institutional Research and Analysis


Cle

vela

nd S

tate

Uni

vers

ity20

16 B

oo

k o

f Tre

nds

Affirmative Action StatementCleveland State University is committed to the principle of

equal opportunity in employment and education. No personat the university will be denied opportunity for employmentor education or be subject to discrimination in any project,

program, or activity because of race, color, religion, nationalorigin, sex, age, genetic information, sexual orientation,disability, disabled veteran, Vietnam-era veteran or other

protected veteran status.

2016 2016 BOT - csuohio.edu · 2016 BOT Book of Trends Cleveland State University 2016 Book of...

Documents

Transcript of 2016 2016 BOT - csuohio.edu · 2016 BOT Book of Trends Cleveland State University 2016 Book of...