20150112 액션러닝 원장님강의09

(Action Learning)

, , Learning Coach , , Feedback : Open Group Program : Single Project Program

AL : (Single Project Program): :

(Open Group Program): AL :

1940 (National Coal Board) (Reg Revans)

' '

. L: LearningP: Programmed KnowledgeQ: Questioning

1980 GE 1983 1984 GE , DuPont, 3M

1990 , , 2000 , .

Action Learning .1 .2 , .3 .4

Y : .5 Learning is any relatively permanent change in behaviorthat occurs as a result of experiences. 6 , .7 () .8

Action Learning

Action learning

Action Learning . . . .

AL : Benchmarking ()

3. Learning Coach

, ( ) , , , , Feedback Reflection ,

No. 1 , .2 , .3 , , .4 , .5 , .

6 , .7 , .8 , , , , .9 , , .

Action learning 1: ?

2: ()? , , or

3: ? or ? ? full time or part time ? ?

2013 300 ()

TASK FORCE TEAM Part time

Action learning 4; ? or ? ?

5: ? 6: ? 7: action

( consulting)

Why ?and What if ? bench marking

feed back

Action learning 4 (scientific school)

(tacit school)

(experiential school)

(critical reflection school)

(Agenda) , , ,

Action Learning(AL) 2 (1 6, 1.5HR)


(Agenda)


Owner Owner

: , , ,

(Project selection)

Project ( )

,

OST(open space technology) ():

:

: 1 2 3

:

Post it ( )( ) ( )

(Team Building)? , - - -

, ! (5~6 ) - ! - , 4 X 7, ,

!(!)!(!)!!!()!!! 1 : : :

Ground Rule(Ground Rule)?, ,

1 3 < >

? , ,

:

()

Dales Cone of Experience .1969: Communication for Safety Professional. Robert Kormikau & Frank McElroy, , 1975, page 370)10%20%30%50%70% 90% Description. Dales Cone of Experience is a model that incorporates several theories related to instructional design and learning processes.During the 1960s, Edgar Dale theorized that learners retain more information by what theydo as opposed to what is heard, read or observed. His research led to the development of the Cone of Experience. Today, this learning by doing has become known as experiential learning or action learning.

100908070605040200

1. !! 2. !! 3. !!

4. "~" !! 5. !! 1.

1. 2. 3.

[Source: ] ,,

[: E. Hurlock- Seri]

http://youtu.be/_35X1tAs0ag

http://youtu.be/u2JxtlsI3QM

Open Questions ( )Neutral Questions ( )Possibility-Searching Questions ( )Value-loadedQuestions ( )Accountability-SearchingQuestions ( )Closed Questions ( )v.s.v.s.v.s.3.

Possibility -Searching Questions

Yes or No v.s. ? ?

( ) v.s. ( ) ? ?

( ) ( )

v.s.Ground Rule ?Ground Rule ?

Why ?What If ?Ideation Questions

- : The 7 Powers of Questions (Dorothy Leeds) ? ( ) . . ( ) . . . ( ) .

1. ?

2. ?

3. ?

2 (5) ! !

2014 Action Learning 4 project 1.()2. ()3.QR ()4. ()

!(!)!(!)!!!()!!! 1 : : :

Ground Rule(Ground Rule)?, ,

1 3 < >

(Gap) = , (Gap), (As-Is) (To-Be)

( ) ( )

4Ps Model(Purpose)(Product) (Probable Issues)(Process) 4Ps ? ? ? ?

4P Focusing-

Focusing

:

4P Focusing-

Project -

Project Project (Project )Project( )( ?)

Project( Project )(Project )

Project

Project Project

Project Project

Project Project , Project Project .

(Warren Edward Buffet) , (Price is what you pay, value is what you get).

Project

Project .Project Project

() , (object) , (goal)

, , . Project . *Project (object) Project *Project (goal) Project Project Project

3C (Customer, Competitor, Company) 3C ( ) (Values) . .

= (, , , ) ( , , )

3C ( ) Project ? ? ? ? ? , ?

3C ( )

? ? ?

3C ( )

? ?

3C ( )

?

List Up , , , , matrix ,

||2134

Project ? project

Project

Project Project ?

Project ?

Project ?

Project ?

Project ?

Project ?

6 ?

?

?

?

?

Cf. 90%

1.

2. ? a)? b) ?

3. ?

4. ?

5. ?

6. ? a)? b) ?

1. ?

2. ?

3. ?

. Logic Tree .

4 ; (Prisoner)

(Vacationer)

(Socializer)

(Learner)

5 1 . , , 2 . 3 . = 4 . 5 . ;

Dales Cone of Experience .1969: Communication for Safety Professional. Robert Kormikau & Frank McElroy, , 1975, page 370)10%20%30%50%80% 90% ?Description. Dales Cone of Experience is a model that incorporates several theories related to instructional design and learning processes.During the 1960s, Edgar Dale theorized that learners retain more information by what theydo as opposed to what is heard, read or observed. His research led to the development of the Cone of Experience. Today, this learning by doing has become known as experiential learning or action learning.

100908070605040200

BrainWritingRandomWord

CrazyIdeaBrain Storming(NGT)[ ][ ]

LateralThinking

Free wheelingRound-Robin Idea Idea idea 1. Brainstorming (Brainstorming)

: . : . : . : .2. Brainstorming 4 (Brainstorming)

3 (Production blocking) (Social inhibition) , , (Social loafing) (Brainstorming)

( ) , (NGT:Nominal Group Technique)

Brain Writing ( ) ,

1. Worksheet * Worksheet .

2. . ( A4 2cm )

3. 2 . worksheet * 1 .

4. 2 .

5. .

6. ? 1 2 1 2Brain Writing ( )

Brain Writing ( )

IdeaIdeaIdeaIdeaIdeaIdea (Random Word)

( ) 15 (Random Word)

? 15 ( )

(Random Word)

1234561TV23456

1.

2. Crazy 1 Post-it .

3. Crazy Idea , 3 .

4. , Smart 1 Post-It .

5. , CRAZY IDEA ? SMART IDEAS1. _____________2.______________3.______________Crazy Idea

Post it ( )( ) ( )

Project 1st . - NGT 2nd , .3rd 90 .

Project Master Plan

(Master Plan)

Project Master Plan

123456789()Output( )

/ / / / Project Master Plan

123456()2 24 ()3 4 ()3 16 ()3 24 ()3 30 ()4 13 ()Output( )

3

-

- -

- - ,

,

- OOO - OOO -D

1 / 1 1 / Project Master Plan

789101112()4 20 ()5 11 ()5 14 ()5 27 ()5 28 ()6 2 ()Output( )

1 Draft

1

1

(1 ) /

/

1 Draft 1

1

(6.4)

5678910 Target AMC Pilot Customer Project Project

* // . * .Project

No. **

* // . * . Project

No. **

* // . * . Project

No. **1 - NPD - 1AL NDP - NPD - OO, OO3/52 - - () - - R/P ( ) - - OO : ( ) - OO3/73 - ( ) - (3) - - - ( ) - OO - OO3/74 - - - : - OO - OO - OO3/55 - (OO,OO,OO) - - ISO - ( ) - : OO / OO - OO3/5

/

? ?

1. ?

2. ?

3. ?

Project Project Project Project . Project Project , , Project Best Practice (Benchmarking) .

Project .

Project . .

* // . * . Project

No. **

1. ? 2. ?3. ?

2. Coaching & Counseling ( )

( ) , (NGT:Nominal Group Technique)

[: 10 : (n/2)-1, 10 : 30%]3-4 (Dot) (Multi-voting)

1 5 1-2

(Fist to Five) (Multi-voting)

(Decision Grid)

123 1 2 3

2. Coaching & Counseling AL

. (As-Is)

2. (To-Be)

3. (Output)

4. . . . 5.

6. 9.

10. 13.

14. (80%!)

7.

8.

15.

16. (Overview)(: , ,:B)

(As-Is) / Best Practice

(To-Be)

(Output)

( )

()

Pilot Test

()(: , ,:B)

Project -

Project Project (Project )Project( )( ?)

Project( Project )(Project )

Project

(Gap) = , (Gap), (As-Is) (To-Be)

( ) ( )

(As-Is) () (Best Practice)

(Tangible Output Image)

(To-Be)(1~3)( 3~5) )

Post it ( )( ) ( )

(As-Is) - - - - - - - - , - - (3) - - ( ) - (3) , ,

- - - - ( ) - -

(To-Be)( 1~3)(3~5) - 50% - 100% - - - -

(As-Is) 3C

() (Company)

(Customer) ( Best Practice)(Competitor)

To-Be( ) Output( )

(To-Be) (Output : )

1. ? 2. ?3. ?

Logic Tree MECE Skill.MECEMECEMECE MECE . Logic Tree Logic Tree/Issue Tree

MECE ,

MECE (Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive) ( ) ( )MECE MECEAB

: A : B : AB ME , CE ( MECE )

(Logic Tree/Issue Tree) Sub-IssueMain Issue MECE

Logic Tree , (Issue) . MECE// Logic Tree

(What is wrong?) , Gap . . Step 1. Logic Tree (3 step)

1) 1 Select .2) - .- 1 2~3 , 5 .3) Naming- Card Title .- .Step 2. Grouping

4) - Naming Naming .- 3~4 , .

5) - ?- Naming ?- ?

Logic Tree . MECE , Naming . , Logic Tree . Step 3. Logic Tree

Data :

- " " - . Tool , , , .

"~ ~ " , . -- , , , , . : *

( )

A . A . A . Bottle Neck A . A (: , , ) . A 1.5 . A (3.5/5.0) 1.0 . A . 5 ( , , ) A . ( ) A . A .

- -()[ : ]

1. 1. ? 2. ? , - 4.252. , 1. ? 2. , ? - - 4.223. 1. ? 2. : - - 4.25

No.()1 OO . - 6 - - -OO(3 5)2A Joint Venture Risk .- - - (Benchmarking)- -OO-OO(3 15)3B() .- - - - Benchmarking-OO-OO(3 10)4 OO OO .- C - - C - -OO-OO(3 10)

( )( )

TRUE

Sheet1

ISSUE1

, : Zone B/H(1.0) 3, 2

(#1)

: 8 1,232 M3/

: 4 1,668 M3/

(#2)

- = 434M3

1 154M3 , 3

,

A B . A C D , B .( )

1) E F : G 2009 3 I A H: I J: E B , A . ()

1.

2.

3. TRUETRUEFALSE

(True or False)

()

(True or False)

R&R , True / (1) ( 2) True (# 3)

, , True ( #4) ( #5)

~ ~ ~ ?

()

; 1) ? 2) ? 3) ?

How might (S + V + O)? (who does what) ~ ~ ~ ?

BrainWritingRandomWord

CrazyIdeaBrain Storming(NGT)[ ][ ]

LateralThinking

Brain Writing ( ) ,

1. Worksheet * Worksheet .

2. . ( A4 2cm )

3. 2 . worksheet * 1 .

4. 2 .

5. .

6. ? 1 2 1 2Brain Writing ( )

Brain Writing ( )

IdeaIdeaIdeaIdeaIdeaIdea (Random Word)

( ) 15 (Random Word)

? 15 - ( )

(Random Word)

1234561TV23456

1.

2. Crazy 1 Post-it .

3. Crazy Idea , 3 .

4. , Smart 1 Post-It .

5. , CRAZY IDEA ? SMART IDEAS1. _____________2.______________3.______________Crazy Idea

1. . 2. 7 . -

3. Post-It , .

4. . (Storyboard) . . ,

12345 1. . 2. ( ) 2. Key word .

[: (n/2)-1]3-4 Dot VotingMulti-Voting

(Impact onBusiness)(Feasibility)H

M

L L M H 1432 (Decision Grid)

(Feasibility)H

M

L L M H1.2. 3. 4., 5. 6. 324561 () (Impact onBusiness)

1 : (,,, ) .4 : .2 : .3 : .()()( ) (Scoring Method)

()

? 2. ? (UCC) (ex) (ex) , SNS (, ) (ex)

- - () (). " " . Naive . . , . . :

, Pilot Test . ( , , ) Pilot Test ( ) , , .

:

*

(, , , , )

, , , .

IT . , .

(Pilot)

. . . Pilot Process 1. Pilot Test Process 2. , 3. Pilot 4. Pilot ,, 5. Pilot , Video (Photo) Tracking 6. Pilot , (Pilot)

Pilot Test Point

Pilot Test Process 1. Pilot . 2. Pilot Project . : - , - - , 3. , 4. Pilot 5. Pilot ,, 6. Pilot , Video(Photo)Tracking 7. Pilot ,

Project Pilot

Project : Pilot Test Quality Assurance Project Pilot

Check List YesNo Pilot ? , , ? ? ? ? Pilot ? Pilot ? Pilot ?

Project Pilot Project Pilot Feedback

()Pilot

Pilot Test Project Pilot

Gap

2. Coaching & Counseling

* // . * . Project

No. **

Blank Chart

Blank Chart Blank Chart

()


OO

OO

OO

& : :

: (, ) : :

:()000 ( ) () .000 ( ) .

& 1. 2. Grouping 3. Grouping Key Words Naming 4. Multi-Voting

(Sponsor Interview : SI)

SponsorSponsor

Best Practice

Best Practice

No.

Workshop

Workshop

No From ~ ToHrs

1. ? 2. ?3. ?

Follow-up .Follow-up Follow-up

- -

MonitoringFacilitating - - - Gantt ChartContingency PlanProcessPointTool/Skill

. .

(what), (why), (when), (where), (who), (How) . .

(, , , ) .

- Process .

- . - .

SMART - Specific : - Measurable : - Achievable : - Result-oriented : / - Time-Bounded :

Action Plan

By whom when

Trouble Shooting Plan

WhatHowBy whomwhen

? ? Project , . 1. Project . 2. . 3. . . 4. . 5. . 6. .

( )

( 1~3)( 3~5)

Presentation , , , 4 . ? , , , ? ? ? - ? - ? ? Check List Slide?

Structured Communication Communication Structured Communication Macro Level Micro Level .Structured CommunicationOverall Structured or Storyline(Macro Level)Individual Page or Support (Micro Level)

*

SW3878s

Based on Logocos current situation and forecast of the next six quarters, the most likely ESD scenario yields an economic breakeven of X years.

Most Likely Scenario

New product revenue - X (based on PPRs)Increases in revenue of existing ESD viable products - YShifts in revenue of ESD viable products - Z

Break Even Chart

Years to Breakeven

Average Yearly Revenue in ESD Channel - $ Millions

Source: XYZ

Assumptions

Logoco

LS1234s

*

Structured Communication - Pyramid Principle Structured Communication Pyramid , Key . Presentation . .

., Pyramid .Pyramid Good Structured Communicator . .

, .Main Big picture .

Pyramid 1. Reader , ,

2. ,

3. Structure (Source : Barbara Minto Pyramid _ )

Pyramid Reader . ,

Pyramid Structure ? () (Structure) Top-Down Pyramid Structure , Pyramid

, ?TV ? . . ., . , . , . . . .! , . . ?, . .

[] .

9 . , 10 30 . . . 11 , ? () () 08:30, 09:00 A,B,C .

(Barbara Minto)1. Reader , . 2. 3. 4.

Process Story Line Draft RewritingSlide Reader

Logic

Logic , Support

Slide Head Message Message Chart Chart Barbara Minto Pyramid Structure , Storyline , Slide

2005 2003 2 (2003-2005): : ()Slide ()

Head Message Do Page (10 ) (40 ) Dont

~, ~

Power Point Visual Communication Tool 5 Rules . Power Point Slide . . . . Key Point .

Figure 1.2 Stock Price Trend, Jan-Sep 2002(Unit: thousand KRW)543210Telco ASource: Thompson Datastream, June 2002X POOR2002 Telco A .Rule 1:

Chart1

1.5

2.4

2.6

2.3

2.8

2.5

4.7

Sheet1

1234

1.52.42.62.32.82.54.7

Figure 1.3 Stock Price Trend, Jan-Sep 2002(Unit: thousand KRW)76543210Telco B76543210Telco A2002 Telco A .Source: Thompson Datastream, June 2002O PREFERREDRule 1:

Chart1

1.5

2.4

2.6

2.2

2.8

2.4

4.7

Sheet1

1234

1.52.42.62.22.82.44.7

Chart1

1.5

2.4

4.3

2.8

5.3

3.8

4.7

Sheet1

1234

1.52.44.32.85.33.84.7

Figure 1.4 XYZs Sales by Business Unit, 1996-2002(Unit: billion KRW)X POOR1996 , .Source: Company Data, June 2002Rule 2:

Figure 1.5 Confectionery Sales, 1996-2002 Figure 1.6 Ice Cream Sales, 1996-2002CAGR: 23%CAGR: -42%Source: Company Data, June 2002(Unit: billion KRW)(Unit: billion KRW)1996 , .O PREFERREDRule 2: .

Chart1

31

39

35

32

15

12

11

Sheet1

31393532151211

Chart1

10

20

25

34

41

55

61

Sheet1

10202534415561

Figure 1.13 Performance - Peer Analysis , 1995-2002(Unit: thousand KRW)X POOR920+-97920+-97920+-97ABIncomeAssetsSalesABAB% change, 1997 vs 1992Source: Say It with Chart, Gene ZelaznyA B B .Rule 3 : .

Figure 1.14 Performance - Peer Analysis , 1995-2002(Unit: %)Source: Say It with Chart, Gene Zelazny10%-10%10%-10%10%-10%ABABABA ROI B ROI .O PREFERREDRule 3 : .

Figure 1.9 XYZs SG&A Cost Breakdown, 2001 2H-2002 1HSource: Arthur Andersen, June 2002(Unit: %)X POOR XYZ Overhead Cost 50% , , Outsourcing .Rule 4 : .

Chart1

46.5

13.8

10.2

17.9

12

7.3

35.6

12.9

74.9

17.8

13.9

11.6

10.6

9.6

21.7

East

Sheet1

Salary & BonusSeverancePensionPromotionsRebatesAdvertisingOutsourcingCommissionTransportationDepreciationBad DebtsWrite OffsRentTaxOthers

East46.513.810.217.9127.335.612.974.917.813.911.610.69.621.7

Figure 1.10 XYZs SG&A Cost Breakdown, 2001 2H-2002 1HSource: Arthur Andersen, June 2002(Unit: %)TransportationOutsourcingDepreciationCommissionSalary & BonusRebatesBad DebtsWrite-OffsSeveranceAdvertisingPensionRentTaxO PREFERRED XYZ Overhead Cost 50% , , Outsourcing .Rule 4 : .

Chart1

2

3

3

4

4

4

4

4

6

6

11

15

24

Sheet1

1234

2334444466111524

Source: Thompson Datastream, June 2002 Figure 1.15 Telco Cs Sales, 1996-2002(Unit: Billion KRW) 2000 .X POOR Figure 1.16 Telco Cs Sales, 1996-2002Source: Thompson Datastream, June 20022000 .(Unit: Billion KRW)O PREFERREDRule 5 : Key Point .

Chart1

10

20

25

34

27

55

61

Sheet1

10202534275561

Chart1

10

20

25

34

27

55

61

Sheet1

10202534275561

Flow .

NGT Flow

Flow Chart Flow Chart Flow Chart

Blank Chart , - - .

Blank Chart . Chart Chart Head Message Head Message

(, ), Pie Chart, , , , , , Power-point, Excel, Photoshop Computer Software .

Blank Chart , , , . (Blank Chart)

()


OO

OO

OO

1. ? 2. ?3. ?

*Facilitation Note!

*** , .****Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!

*****Facilitation Note!

**Facilitation Note!

*********Facilitation Note!

- .- .

1. (, , ) Ice breaker 2.Out put Image Out put image 3. . - - . - 5. & ( ) .

*******Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!


*Facilitation Note!

*****Facilitation Note!

*********Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!


**************Facilitation Note!


******Facilitation Note!

**************Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!

*******Facilitation Note!

: * : ** 2 . *Facilitation Note!

***Facilitation Note!

*Facilitation Note!

20150112 액션러닝 원장님강의09

Business

Transcript of 20150112 액션러닝 원장님강의09