2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One Today’s ppt is available on the Professional...

2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One

Today’s ppt is available on the Professional Development page of Healthful Living Wiki at http://hlnces.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Professional+DevelopmentWireless password

http://hlnces.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Professional+Development

http://hlnces.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Professional+Development

Analysis of Student Work

What We Learned in Year One

NCDPI ASW Team

Arts EducationChristie Lynch Ebert

Slater Mapp

AP/IBSneha Shah-Coltrane

Healthful LivingBurt Jenkins

World LanguagesAnn Marie Gunter

CoordinatorJen DeNeal

Analysis of Student Work

6 Analysis of Student Work

Contribute

to Academic

Success

Beginning in 2014-2015, ASW became the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages.

Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.

ASW Timeline from 2014 - 2015http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/14-15Implementation

Time Task Completed

April 1 – May 20, 2015

ASW Reviewer Application Window• Applications were reviewed on an ongoing basis with

priority deadlines of May 1st and May 20th • Reviewer applicants selected moved on to training

Late May – Early July

ASW Reviewer Training Completed• Certification Module Passed• Over 600 ASW Reviewers

June 19, 2015 ASW Evidence Collections Uploaded• Upload Window OPEN until 5:00 p.m. (extended)• Over 6,300 Evidence Collections with 3 Timelapse

Artifacts each

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/14-15Implementation


Overall ASW Numbers

• 69 LEA’s + multiple charters • 6,415 Teachers Submitted Evidence

Collections– Made up of 19,245 Timelapse Artifacts

• 12,830 Evidence Collections Reviewed (minimum of 2 reviews per collection)

• 97% reviewed


Time Task Completed

July ASW Review

August ASW Review Ratings and Feedback Comments processed by NCDPI

September - October

SAS completes Value-Added Analysis for Standard 6 ratings from EOGs, EOCs, NC Final Exams, & K-3 Checkpoints.

Early to mid- November

All teachers receive Standard 6 ratings from 2014 – 2015

November 12, 2015

Webinar on ASW Results from 2014 – 2015• 3:30 – 5:00 p.m. as GoToWebinar• Will be recorded and posted approximately 1 week later



ASW Numbers for Healthful Living

• 2,344 Healthful Living Teachers Submitted Evidence Collections (over 1/3 of all submissions)

• Made up of 7,032 Timelapse Artifacts

• 4,688 Evidence Collections to be reviewed (minimum of 2 reviews per collection)

Healthful Living Reviewers

• 110 reviewers

• Top reviewer rated over 100 collections

• 98.7% reviewed

So When Am I Getting My Rating?


Time Task Completed

July ASW Review


September - October




November 12, 2015




Results for 2014-15 Healthful Living ASW

• Results in late October early to mid November with other EOC/EOG tests.


Time Task Completed

July ASW Review


September - October




November 12, 2015




Waiver Policy

• Waiver Policy is to go before the Board November 4th and/or 5th.

ASW Wiki

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/home



Reviewers Feedback Comments

• Feedback Comments available to download on the ASW wiki

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Reviewer+Resources

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Reviewer+Resources

Interpreting Results for 2014-15 Healthful Living ASW

• Each Timelapse Artifact is rated:– Exceeds Expected Growth– Meets Expected Growth– Does Not Meet Expected

Growth

• Reviewer may provide feedback comments on each artifact.

TA 3

TA 5

TA 2

TA 4

TA 1

For 2015-16, an evidence collection will be made up of 5 Timelapse Artifacts.

ASW Quality Rubric

X X X X X XTimelasp

e

Artifact

#1

X

X

Timelasp

e Artifact

#2

X

X

X

X

X

X

Timelasp

e

Artifact

#3

X

X

X

X

X

X

X X X X X XTim

elaspe

Artifact

#4 X

X

Timelasp

e Artifact

#5

Interpreting Results for 2014-15 Healthful Living ASW

• Evidence Collection is rated– Exceeds Expected Growth– Meets Expected Growth– Does Not Meet Expected

Growth

based on the timelapse artiacts

• Reviewer may provide feedback comments for the entire collection.

• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth

Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below:

Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection

Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection

Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

1

1

Does Not Meet Meets ExceedsD D D D D M M M M M E E E E ED D D D E M M M M E M E E E ED D D D M D M M M M M M E E ED D D E E M M M E E D E E E ED D D M E D D M M M D M E E ED D D M M D M M M E D D E E E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E

Evidence Collection Rating Form

D M E D MTA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5

An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of data for Standard 6.

Effectiveness Status

3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6

6 6 62014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Standard Standard Standard

5 Rating Categories

1 65432Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

KnowContent

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Contribute

to Academic

Success

3 Rating Categories

Not Demonstrated

Developing

Proficient

Accomplished

Distinguished

Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System

6 6

Contribute to Academic

Success

6Year 1

2014-2015Does Not Meet

Expected Growth

Year 22015-2016

Meets Expected Growth

Year 32016-2017



Ms. NC’s 3 years of growth data:

2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1)

2015-16 Meets (Year 2)+ 2016-17 Meets (Year 3)

Ms. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth

Effectiveness Status LEAs/Charter Schools who took part in ASW in 2014 Best 2 out of 3 years of data

6 6


Success

6Year 1

2014-2015Meets

Expected Growth

Year 22015-2016

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Year 32016-2017



Mrs. NC’s 3 years of growth data:

2014-15 Meets (Year 1) School Wide Data 2015-16 Does Not Meet

(Year 2)+ 2016-17 Meets (Year 3)

Mrs. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth

Effectiveness Status LEAs/Charter Schools who waived out of ASW in 2014 Best 2 out of 3 years of data

School Wide Data

6 6


Success

6Year 1

2015-2016Meets

Expected Growth

Year 22016-2017


Year 32017-2018



Mr. NC’s 3 years of growth data:

2015-16 Meets (Year 1) 2016-17 Meets (Year 2)+ 2017-18 Meets (Year 3)

Mr. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2015-2018 Meets Expected Growth

Effectiveness StatusCharter Schools that are part of ASW for the first time in 2015

In Need of Improvement

Effective Highly Effective

Any rating lower than proficient

Proficient or Higher

on Standards1-5

Accomplishedor Higher

on Standards1-5

1Demonstrate Leadership

2Establish Environment

345

Know Content

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Standards

Does Not Meet

Expected Growth

Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth

Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017

6Contribute to Academic Success (3 yrs. of data)

Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017

2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership

Standard 2 Establish Environment

Standard 3Know Content

Standard 4Facilitate Learning

Standard 5 Reflect on Practice

Standard 6Three year growth

data

X

X

XX

XBest 2 out of 3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017


Effective

Principal Role

ASW Wiki

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Teacher+Resources



New Resources for 2015-16

The Standard 6 ASW Procedures Manual provides step by step instructions in the compilation of an Evidence Collection.




New Resources for 2015-16

The ASW Timelapse Artifact Template has been developed to assist teachers in Health and Physical Education to plan and implement a single Timelapse Artifact from beginning to end.




ASW Process: A Quick Guide

ASW Timeline for 2015 - 2016http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/15-16Implementation



Teachers are responsible for the items within the red boxes.

Teaching Context Validate Class Schedule for ASW Courses

• Screen shot

DON

E

Class Selection

The online platform selects the classes from which the Student Work Samples will be collected.

DON

E

Class Selection

The teacher reviews the 5 classes selected for ASW Process.

DON

E

2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One Today’s ppt is available on the Professional...

Documents

Transcript of 2015 NCAAHPERD-SM ASW What We Learned in Year One Today’s ppt is available on the Professional...