2015 Complete Overview of the NCQA Standards Session Code: … · 2015-09-23 · – Fellowship...
Transcript of 2015 Complete Overview of the NCQA Standards Session Code: … · 2015-09-23 · – Fellowship...
2015 Complete Overview of the NCQA Standards
Session Code: TU13
Time: 2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Total CE Credits: 1.5
Presenter: Frank Stelling, MEd, MPH
1
Introduction to NCQA Credentialing Standards
NAMSS Educational Conference & ExhibitionOctober 6, 2015
Anatomy of a Standard
All materials © 2015, National Committee for Quality Assurance
Anatomy of a Standard
Standard statementStatement about acceptable performance or results
Intent statementSentence describing importance of standard
Summary of changesChanges from year to year
3
2
Anatomy of a Standard
ScoringLevel of performance necessary to receive specified percentage of points
Data sourceDocumentation organizations use to demonstrate performance
Scope of reviewLists the survey types and the type of documentation NCQA reviews for each type.
Look-back periodPeriod for which the organization must demonstrate performance, measured back from submission date
4
Anatomy of a Standard
ExplanationSpecific requirements
that the organization must meet, and guidance
for demonstrating performance against the
element (by factor if appropriate)
Related informationAdditional information
that may assist the customer, but not
required.
5
ExamplesDemonstrations of how
requirements can be met.
Anatomy of a Standard
ExplanationSpecific requirements
that the organization must meet, and guidance
for demonstrating performance against the
element
Related informationAdditional information
that may assist the customer, but not
required.
6
3
Data Sources to Show Compliance
Documented process - Policies and procedures, process flow charts, protocols and other mechanisms that describe the operating guidelines or methodology used by the organization to complete a requirement
7
Data Sources to Show Compliance
Reports - Aggregated sources of evidence of action or performance, including management reports; key indicator reports; summary reports from member reviews; system output giving information like number of member appeals; minutes; other documentation of actions an organization has taken
8
Data Sources to Show Compliance
Materials - Prepared information that the organization provides to its members and practitioners, including written and electronic communication, Web-sites, scripts, brochures, reviews and clinical guidelines; contracts or agreements with practitioners, delegates and vendors
9
4
Data Sources to Show Compliance
Records or files - History of cases, proceedings, verification of actions involving members or practitioners, such as documentation of completion of denial, appeal, complex case management or credentialing activities
10
Credentialing Standards
All materials © 2015, National Committee for Quality Assurance
1. Types of practitioners to credential
2. Verification sources
3. Criteria
4. Decision-making
5. File management
6. Delegation
7. Non-discrimination
Written policies/procedures address:
CR 1A: Practitioner Credentialing Policies
12
5
8. Notifying practitioners if verification source information is different
9. Notification of the CR decision within 60 days
10. Medical director or other practitioner directly responsible for the CR program
11. Ensuring confidentiality
12. Ensuring the directory is accurate
Written policies/procedures address:
CR 1A: Practitioner Credentialing Policies
13
Written policies/procedures require credentialing of all practitioners with whom the organization has an independent relationship! Even those not included in the NCQA file review process
Factor 1: Types of Practitioners
14
Licensed independent practitioners (physicians and non-physicians) who provide care for members AND:
• Have an independent relationship with the organization
• See members outside of an inpatient hospital setting or ambulatory free-standing facilities
• Are hospital-based AND see members as a result of independent relationship with organization
• Are oral surgeons providing care under the medical benefit
Factor 1: Types of Practitioners
15
6
Credentialing not required for practitioners meeting ANY of the following criteria:• Practice exclusively in inpatient setting or free-
standing facility AND provide care to members directed to the facility, not the individual practitioner
• Pharmacists who work for a Pharmacy Benefits Manager
• Practitioners who do not provide care for members in a treatment setting (e.g. board certified consultants)
Factor 1: Types of Practitioners
16
• The primary source, the entity that originally conferred or issued the credential, or
• A contracted agent of the primary source, or• Another NCQA-accepted source listed for the
credential
Factor 2: Verification Sources
17
Use of an agent• Entity that contracts with an approved source to
provide requested credentialing information• This contractual relationship must entitle the agent to
provide verification of specific credentials on behalf of the primary source
Factor 2: Verification Sources
18
7
• The decision-making criteria the organization uses to assess the practitioner’s ability to deliver care
• Examples
– Must be board certified
– Malpractice insurance at 1M-3M
– No sanctions
Factor 3: Criteria
19
•Clean files: Medical Director or the Credentialing Committee
•Files that do not meet criteria: Credentialing Committee only
Factor 4: Decision Making
20
How are the files managed and who manages themHow are they kept secureHow are they kept confidential
Factor 5: Managing Files
21
8
Appropriate DocumentationActual copies of credentialing informationA detailed signed/initialed and dated checklist. For each verification, the checklist must include: – The name of the source used
– The date of verification
– The signature or initials of the person who verified the information
– The report date, if applicableAutomated credentialing system
Factor 5: Managing Files
22
Appropriate VerificationOral or verbal verification received by the organizationWritten verification in the form of a letter or cumulative report, NCQA uses the date of the official document (date on the letter or report), not the receipt date, to assess performance against timeliness requirements
Internet and electronic verification, NCQA uses the date generated by the source when the information is retrieved
The organization's staff person who verified the credentials must sign or initial the verification
Factor 5: Managing Files
23
Applies to all practitioners applying for the first time, and only onceRequired Elements:
– PSV of current, valid license to practice, 5 years malpractice claims or settlements from carrier or NPDB query
– Current and signed application and attestation
– All conducted within 180 calendar days of Credentialing Committee decision or sign off by medical director/designee
– 60 calendar day maximum allowed
Provisional Credentialing
24
9
Describes the process the organization uses when delegating any part of credentialing to another entity
If no delegating or no intent to delegate, the organization must state it in its policies and procedures
Factor 6: Delegation
25
Policies and procedures must address the following:Non-discrimination based on gender, race/ethnicity, age, sexual orientation or types of patients seen (e.g. Medicaid)
Process for preventing discriminationProcess for monitoring discrimination
Factor 7: Non-discrimination
26
Factor 8: Notification of discrepanciesMust have a policy or process for contacting practitioners when the information varies between what the practitioner has provided and what other sources state
Factor 9: Notification of decisionMust have a policy or process for notifying the practitioner within 60 calendar days of the final credentialing decision
Factor 8 & 9: Notification
27
10
The organization must include in its policy who is directly responsible for the credentialing program. It may be:The Medical DirectorDesignated physician
Factor 10: Medical Director
28
Policies and procedures must:•State that information obtained in the credentialing process is confidential
•Describe the mechanisms used to keep credentialing information confidential
•State that practitioners can access their own credentialing information
Factor 11: Confidentiality
29
Policies and procedures must describe the followingThe process the organization uses to ensure information in its directory is consistent with credentialing information
– Education, training, board certification and specialty
Factor 12: Practitioner Directories
30
11
Policies & Procedures describe
• Practitioners’ right to:– Review information submitted in support of application
– Correct any erroneous information
– Be informed of status of application – upon request
• Notification of rights– Materials used to communicate rights
CR 1B: Practitioner Rights
31
Includes representation from the organization’s participating practitioners
Uses a peer review processMeeting minutes reflect thoughtful consideration of credentials
NCQA calculates credentialing time frames based only on Credentialing Committee decision date
CR 2A: Credentialing Committee
32
Medical Director or “equally qualified practitioner ” may sign off on “clean” files
Credentialing Committee must review files not meeting established criteria
Process must be documented in organization’s policies and procedures
CR 2A: Credentialing Committee
33
12
CR 2A: Credentialing Committee
Use of electronic signatures for sign-off is acceptable
Meetings and decision-making may take place through real-time virtual meetings (e.g. video conferencing or WebEx with audio)
Meetings may not be conducted through e-mail only
34
CR 3: Verification Procedures
Primary Source Verification
– Information is obtained directly from the source organization
• Recognized Verification Sources
−Acceptable sources that are proven to primary source verify
− Agents of primary sources
35
Oral or Internet Information Source
−Dated and signed/initialed
−Source used
−Date of source
− FindingsAll hand written documentation and signatures for clean files must be written in ink
CR 3: Documenting Verification
36
13
Information
Current Valid License
Verification Source(s)
State Licensing
Agency
CR 3A: Factor 1: License Verification (Initial and Recred)
37
Accepted IF state licensing agency controls the Web-site
• Example: State agency maintains its own
Web-site that includes the necessary
information
Web-Site Verification of License
38
IF the state does not maintain or control the Web-site or database
– The organization is responsible for verifying that the information on the Web-site or in a database
(e.g., AIM) is as timely and accurate as the state’s information
Web-Site Verification of License
39
14
The organization must obtain a one-time letter from the state agency attesting to accuracy and timeliness of information on the Web-site or database (e.g., AIM, docfinder)
Web-Site Verification of License
40
NCQA does not accept letters or documentation from third party databases, links, or sources (e.g., AIM, docboard, etc.) assuring the accuracy and timeliness of the information
Web-Site Verification of License
41
Information
DEA or CDS Certificate
For all states where the practitioner is providing care for the organization
Verification Source(s)
• Copy of certificate
• Visual inspection of certificate
•DEA or CDS Agency
confirmation• NTIS database entry
• AMA Master file
• State pharmaceutical licensing agency
Factor 2: DEA/CDS Verification (Initial and Recred)
42
15
Initial Credentialing (Physicians) - The organization must verify only the highest level of credentials attained
If a physician is board-certified, verification of that board certification fully meets this element– Organization must verify board certification expiration date
– If a physician is not board certified, verification of residency training fully meets this requirement
– Fellowship verification is not required and does not meet educational verification requirements
Factor 3: Verification of Education & Training (Initial Only)
43
Non-physicians - The organization must verify onlythe highest level of education/training attained
– Board certification if written proof the primary source verifies education and training
– If not board certified or board does not PSV, verification of professional school
– Fellowship verification is not required and does not meet educational verification requirements
Verification of Education & Training
44
Information
Education and Training:Physicians (MD/DO)
_________________
Board Certification
Verification of certification
Verification Source(s)
• ABMS entry
• AMA Masterfile
• AOA Profile Report or
Physician Masterfile• Confirmation from specialty
board
• Confirmation from non-ABMS
or non-AOA specialty board
(w/proof of primary
verification)• Confirmation from state
licensing agency (w/proof of
primary verification)
Verification of Education & Training
45
16
Acceptable ABMS SourcesABMSABMS Licensed Agent*check ABMS web-site for list of agents
Verification of Education & Training
46
Information
Education and Training:
Physicians(MD/DO) not board certified
__________________
Completion of Residency
Verification Source(s)
• Confirmation from residency program
• AOA Profile Report or Physician Masterfile
• AMA Masterfile• Confirmation from
state licensing agency (w/proof of
primary verification)
Verification of Education & Training
47
Information
Education and Training:
Physicians(MD/DO) no residency
training__________________
Medical School Graduation
Verification Source(s)
• Confirmation from medical school
• AOA Profile Report or
Physician Masterfile• AMA Masterfile• ECFMG (international
graduates after 1986)•Confirmation from state licensing agency (w/proof
of primary verification)
Verification of Education & Training
48
17
Information
Education and
Training:Oral Surgeons
__________________
Completion of
Residency
Verification Source(s)
• Confirmation from
residency program• Confirmation from
state licensing
agency (w/proof of primary verification)
• Dental board if
proof of performing PSV
Verification of Education & Training
49
Information
Education and Training:Non-physician practitioners
_________________
Professional School Graduation
Verification Source(s)
• Confirmation from professional school
• Confirmation from
state licensing agency (w/proof of primary verification)
•Confirmation from specialty board or registry that uses
primary source
Verification of Education & Training
50
Whether certification meets education and training requirements or not
Must be verified if practitioner states that he or she is board certified
Use same sources as stated under education and training
Factor 4: Verification of Board
Certification (Initial and Recred)
51
FS2
Slide 51
FS2 Remove thisFrank Stelling, 6/5/2015
18
DEA/CDS Certificates
– If no certificate, need an explanation and a process for ensuring coverage for patients needing prescriptions requiring a certificate
Board Certification
– If no expiration date, must verify certification is current
Education - Use of sealed transcript for verification on education and training
– Must be in unbroken sealed envelope from institution
Primary Source Verification
52
Information
Work History
Verification Source(s)
•Application/curriculum
vitae –5 years of most recent work
history–Review any gap ≥ 6 months–Clarify in writing any gap of >
1 year–Verification timeframe – 365 days
(180 days for Medicare plans)
Factor 5: Work History (Initial Only)
53
Information
Malpractice Claims History
Verification Source(s)
•NPDB query or initial report
from an NCQA recognized disclosure service, on new
practitioner
•5 years claims history from malpractice carrier
Factor 6: Claims Verification (Initial and Recred)
54
19
Sanction information required to be included in credentialing files:
– Information about sanctions and restrictions on licensure and limitations on scope of practice
– Information about sanctions by Medicare/Medicaid
– Within a 180 day timeframe
CR 3B: Sanction Information(Initial and Recredential)
55
Sanction information required to be included in credentialing files:
– Information about sanctions and restrictions on licensure and limitations on scope of practice
– Information about sanctions by Medicare/Medicaid
Sanction Information
56
Review must cover
– Most recent five year period available through the data source
– All the states in which the practitioner has worked
during that time period
Verification of Licensure Sanctions
57
20
Practitioner Type
Physician
Chiropractor
Verification Source(s)
- NPDB- FSMB- State licensing agency
- NPDB - State Board of Chiropractic
Examiners- Federation of ChiropracticLicensing board (CIN-BAD)
Verification of Licensure Sanctions
58
Practitioner Type
Oral Surgeon
Podiatrist
Verification Source(s)
- NPDB- State Board of Dental Examiners
- NPDB
- State Board of Podiatric Examiners- Federation of Podiatric Medical Boards
Verification of Licensure Sanctions
59
Practitioner Type
Non-physician Practitioner
Verification Source(s)
- NPDB- State Licensing Board
or Certification Agency
Verification of Licensure Sanctions
60
21
Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions
Acceptable sources
– NPDB
– FSMB
– List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (available over the Internet)
– Medicare and Medicaid Sanctions and Reinstatement Report
– State Medicaid agency or intermediary and Medicare intermediary
– Federal Employees Health Benefits Program department record published by OPM, OIG
61
Quiz: Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions
For which practitioner type(s) is no query required?
• Chiropractor
• Podiatrist
• Oral Surgeon
• Non-physician health practitioner
62
Required Elements:
− Attestations
− Signature and date
CR 3C: Application/Attestation(Initial and Recred)
63
22
Reasons for inability to perform essential job functions, with/without accommodation
Lack of present illegal drug useHistory of loss of license and felony convictionsHistory of loss or limitation of privileges or disciplinary actions
Current malpractice coverageAffirmative statement re: correct/ complete application
Attestations
64
What if
• The organization’s application doesn’t
include an attestation about current malpractice insurance coverage?
The organization may use a signed addendum
or obtain a copy of the insurance face sheet
Attestations
65
State Required Applications
If state requires organization to use an application….
And the application does not include all NCQA requirements…
And the organization cannot change the application…
NCQA will hold organization harmless
66
23
365 days between verification and decision180 days for Medicare plans
Application and
Attestation Timeframes
67
Occurs at least every 36 months
The recredentialing decision date must be within 36months of the previous credentialing date
Recredentialing timeliness is a separate standard
CR 4A: Recredentialing Cycle Length
68
CR 5: Practitioner Office Site Quality
Organizations have a process to ensure that the offices of all practitioners meet their office site standards
69
24
Practitioner Office Site Quality
Performance Standards and Thresholds
– Documented process must include the
following:• physical accessibility• physical appearance• adequacy of waiting and examining room space• adequacy of treatment record keeping
70
CR 5B: Practitioner Office Site Quality
Site Visit and Ongoing Monitoring
Conduct visits of offices which meet the
organization’s established thresholds for member complaints pertaining to office site
quality
1. Monitor complaints for all practitioners
2. Perform within 60 calendar days of meeting organization’s established
threshold of complaints71
CR 5B: Practitioner Office Site Quality
Site Visit and Ongoing Monitoring
3. Institute actions as needed for
improvement with sites that reach the
complaint threshold
4. Re-evaluates at least every 6 months
until sites with deficiencies meet performance requirements
5. Document follow-up visits
72
25
CR 5B: Practitioner Office Site Quality
Issues not part of office site quality:
– Appointment availability (evaluated in QI 5)
– Confidentiality and availability of records
73
CR 6A: Ongoing Monitoring of Sanctions,
Complaints and Quality Issues
Written policy and procedure for ongoingmonitoring of:– Medicare and Medicaid sanctions– Sanctions/limitations on licensure
– Complaints– Adverse events
Appropriate interventions when issues identified
74
QI Ongoing Monitoring
Sanctions
– Within 30 calendar days of the date the information becomes available
• for entities that do not release information on a set schedule
– query at least every 6 months
• for reporting entities that do not release sanction information
– query for any affected practitioner 12-18 months after last
credentialing cycle
75
26
Ongoing Monitoring
Sanctions
– Subscription to an alert service of NCQA-recognized source may be used
– Information must be reviewed within 30 calendar
days of a new alert
• evidence of subscription must be provided
– Documented in checklist, log or initialed/dated
report
76
Ongoing Monitoring
Complaints
– Process to evaluate, at least every six months
– Process to investigate practitioner-specific complaints on receipt
– Evaluation of specific complaint AND history of issues, if applicable, must show evidence of this
evaluation
77
Ongoing Monitoring
Adverse Events – injuries to members that happen while receiving care from a practitioner
– Process to evaluate, at least every six months
– Process to investigate practitioner-specific events
on receipt of informationImplementation of actions based on organization’s policies and procedures, if applicable
78
27
Written procedures for actions against practitioners:
– Range of actions that can be taken
– Reporting to authorities
– A well-defined appeal process
– Making the appeal process known to practitionersAligns with HCQIA of 1986 which provides peer review protection
CR 7A: Notification to Authorities and
Practitioner Appeal Rights
79
Procedures for reporting serious quality issues to appropriate authorities
– State agencies
– NPDBMust provide evidence of following appeal process if it altered the conditions of practitioners’ participation
Applies to physicians and non-physician practitioners
Notification to Authorities and
Practitioner Appeal Rights
80
Practitioner Appeal Process
Inform affected practitioners of the appeal process, including:
– Providing written notification that a professional review action has been brought, reasons for the
action, summary of the appeal rights and process
– Allowing the practitioner to request a hearing and the specific time period for submitting the request
– Allowing at least 30 days after the notification for the practitioner to request a hearing
81
28
Practitioner Appeal Process
Inform affected practitioners of the appeal process, including:
– Allowing the practitioner to be represented by an attorney or another person of the practitioner’s
choice
– Appointing a hearing officer or a panel of individuals to review the appeal
– Providing written notification of the appeal decision that contains the specific reasons for the
decision
82
Written P&P for initial and ongoing assessment of organizational providers
• Determination of good standing with appropriate state/federal agencies
• Accreditation status verified or site visit with evaluation against quality standards
• Reconfirm every 3 years
CR 8A: Organization Providers
83
CR 8A: Organization Providers
Exception if:
– The provider is not accredited, and
– The state or CMS has not conducted a site review, and
– The provider is in a rural area, as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau
– Must identify excluded providers and include evidence that the above conditions are met
84
29
Medical (8B)HospitalsHome health agenciesSkilled nursing facilities
Free-standing surgical centers
Behavioral Health (8C)Inpatient
– 24 hour behavioral units in general hospitals
– Free standing psychiatric hospitals
Residential treatment centers
Ambulatory – Mental health and
substance abuse facilities
CR 8B-C: Provider Types
85
Example: Skilled nursing facilityAccreditation Status - not accredited
Standards for Participation (Example of a
partial list of criteria)
• Has functional QI program in place– 2 QI activities/year
• Has medical record-keeping standards• Meets Health Plan’s credentialing
standards
Site Visit Standards
86
Questions
87