2015 Code Industry Summit Day Two - Keynote Speaker
-
Upload
code-communications -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
139 -
download
1
Transcript of 2015 Code Industry Summit Day Two - Keynote Speaker
DAY TWO
COMMUNITY PROSECUTION & GRANT FUNDING:
A LOOK AT DALLAS’ GROWTH
Maureen Milligan, Chief of Community Prosecution & Community Courts, Dallas City Attorney’s Office
Juan “Johnny” Ramos, Community Prosecution Code Supervisor, Dallas Department of Code Compliance
DALLAS COMMUNITY PROSECUTION TEAM: STAFFING MODEL
Community Prosecutor
Fire Prevention OfficerCode Officer
DEFINITION OF COMMUNITY PROSECUTION
“Community prosecution focuses on targeted areas and involves a long term, proactive partnership among the prosecutor’s office, law enforcement, the community, and public and private organizations, whereby the authority of the prosecutor’s office is used to solve problems, improve public safety, and enhance the quality of life in the community.”
---American Prosecutors Research Institute/Bureau of Justice Assistance Community Prosecution Focus Group, 1995
FOUR KEY PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY PROSECUTION
1. Recognizing the community’s role in public safety
2. Engaging in problem solving3. Establishing and maintaining
partnerships4. Evaluating outcomes of activities
Source: http://www.ndaa.org/nccp_home.html
DALLAS COMMUNITY PROSECUTION TEAM:
MISSION STATEMENTMission: The mission of the Community Prosecution Team is to proactively
improve public safety and the quality of life within the City of Dallas by: Engaging the community to identify and solve nuisance-related
problems, Strategically collaborating with other city departments and local
agencies to more effectively deploy city resources, Seeking voluntary compliance from property owners who maintain
substandard or hazardous properties or illegal land uses, and Using all available legal tools to gain compliance from non-
compliant property owners.
FIRST PRINCIPLE: RECOGNIZING THE COMMUNITY’S ROLE IN PUBLIC SAFETYProactively invite stakeholders to express their concerns
Work together to identify and define problems
Develop and implement solutions
DECISION POINT: DEGREE OF IMMERSION
Office location
Caseload size
Size of geographic area
Team members’ experience and skill set
7 target areas
15 Assistant City Attorneys
10 Code Officers
2 Fire Prevention Officers
12 Community Court staff members
COMMUNITY PROSECUTION TARGET AREAS
SECOND PRINCIPLE: ENGAGING IN PROBLEM SOLVING
PROBLEM PROPERTIESWhat do we usually do?
“It’s not my problem”
“I am only responsible for…”
“I’d like to help, but I don’t have the resources”
“It is a house at 123 Main Street. It is owned by John Smith.”
STRATEGIC GUIDELINESInitial visit to propertyIdentify type of problem propertyIdentify type of ownerDevelop strategy & timeline for addressing problems Who/what is part of the problem? Who can be part of the solution? What needs to happen first? Next? Last?Make personal contact with ownerSeek voluntary complianceEnforcement
TYPES OF PROBLEM PROPERTIESActive drug/prostitution houseStash house (drugs or stolen goods)SmokehouseGang hangout/Hangout for teenagersHomeless encampmentPotential location for crime Theft, burglary Graffiti Place to take a victimHome for dogs, cats, wildlifeSubstandard & dangerousIllegal (zoning; lack of licenses/permits)
TYPES OF “OWNERS” OF PROBLEM PROPERTIESDeceased owner No will, no identifiable heirs No will, identifiable heirs, unwilling to care for property Drug-addicted/mentally ill heirs
Investor Not local, no property management or unqualified management Local, high-volume of properties, money is sole focus Local, no funds Local, unmotivated
Bank-owned
Fraudulent owner
City Owned
DECEASED OWNER, SUBSTANDARD HOME
WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM?Reportedly mentally unstable occupant with an alleged history
of engaging in criminal mischief and violence Slashed neighbors’ tires and broke windows Racist statements Walked through neighborhood shouting and screaming
Occupant would have remained in neighborhood and house would have continued to deteriorate
HOW HAD WE PREVIOUSLY TRIED TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM?
Code inspectionsNotices of violationOutreach by neighborsSocial ServicesReferral to tax collection law firm for outstanding property
taxes
But then it becomes city-owned…
WHAT ELSE COULD WE DO?Solution: Writ of possession
Multi-agency operation Sheriff’s office (execute writ) Code inspectors (inspect premises) Animal Control (seize animals) Crisis Intervention (interview occupant) DPD Mental Health Officer (mental health warrant)
Later joined by…… Fire department (make entry with power saw) Bomb squad (inspect trip wire & evacuate neighborhood) News station
FINAL OUTCOME?
BANK/INVESTOR-OWNED, ILLEGAL LAND USE
WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM?Original owner built numerous structures without any building
permits; Structures spanned two separate lots
Current owner planned to open group home and allow tenants to rent individual shacks
Located across the street from senior day care, 3 blocks from elementary school
HOW HAD WE TRIED TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM?
We hadn’t
One of the most dangerous streets in Dallas; officers wouldn’t exit their vehicle without AR-15
Newspaper had published an article decrying the lack of zoning enforcement in this residential neighborhood
City Attorney’s office was wary of filing lawsuits related to single-family properties in District Court
WHAT ELSE COULD WE DO?Solution: Make contact with bank representatives Track down new owners after the bank sold it Document, document, document Become a private investigator as the property kept being flipped ***New Tool: Municipal Repair Docket
FINAL OUTCOME?
ILLEGAL BUSINESS
WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM?New business located directly across the street from
elementary schoolBlacked out windows, all customers had to be buzzed inVirtually no retail productsUncooperative business owners
HOW HAD WE TRIED TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM?
Visited property the day after receiving a complaint from the principal
WHAT ELSE COULD WE DO?Solution: Revisited numerous times to attempt inspection Enforced all applicable codes Contacted property owner and required him to attend inspections
FINAL OUTCOME?
ILLEGAL BUSINESS
FINAL OUTCOME?
SOLVING MORE THAN ONE PROBLEM
CITY OF D
ALLAS
COMMUNITY COURTS
COMMUNITY COURTSThe Community Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate quality of life
offenses
The Community Court is a “plea court” If a defendant pleads “Not Guilty” his case is referred to the main municipal
courthouse at 2014 Main
Defendants who plead “Guilty” or “No Contest” may be ordered to: perform community service in lieu of paying a fine attend rehabilitative or educational programs (if necessary) abate the violation (for code citations)
All City of Dallas citations are dismissed after successful completion of program (except for theft & assault offenses)
COMMUNITY COURT LOCATIONSSouth Dallas West Dallas South Oak Cliff
Potential community service sites: vacant lots landscaping/minor repair for elderly or disabled trash pick-up after a community event graffiti wipe-outs
COMMUNITY COURT: SUCCESS STORIESProblem: Substandard house near a convenience store. Owner, a drug addict,
allowed drug users and prostitutes to use the property.Community Court Solution: Owner was cited for litter. He agreed to enter
an inpatient substance abuse program. He is currently clean & sober, has his own apartment and regularly attends his sister’s church.
Problem: Substandard house occupied by a hoarder. Located across a playing field from an elementary school.
Community Court Solution: Community Prosecutor obtained permission from the property owner to have Community Court defendants and community volunteers clean the property.
Problem: Widespread prostitution at truck stops near I-20.Community Court Solution: DPD Vice Unit, Community Court and social
service agencies target truck stop prostitutes once a month through the New Life Opportunities Initiative.
ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIESDedicate percentage of code enforcement fines to a home
repair program Operation GoodwillOperation Crackdown Landlord Hall of ShameNew/modified ordinances and lawsFood TrustCommunity Toolkit
FUNDING YOUR PROGRAMFirst Step: Identify a research partner & technical assistance provider Local higher education institution or private research institute Center for Community Progress—Technical Assistance Scholarship Program National Crime Prevention Council—Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design training
Community Development Block Grants Objective Category: Suitable Living Environment; Outcome Category:
Sustainability
Office of Justice Programs SMART Prosecution—promote effective data-driven, research-based
approaches to prosecution JAG Grant—specifically allows for personnel costs related to
prosecution/courts & strategic planning; funding allocation is based on statutory formula
BUILDING & RETAINING SUPPORT FOR YOUR PROGRAMCelebrate small and big success Social media Council briefings Presentations at neighborhood meetings
Include the community in your efforts When possible, include community stakeholders
(neighborhood & for-profit/non-profit leaders) in the planning process
Meet regularly with all stakeholders & meet them on their own turf
Be accessible and transparent
CLOSING WORDS
SEE YOU NEXT YEAR!