2014 Infonetics 100g in the Metro 19feb2014 Final

7/21/2019 2014 Infonetics 100g in the Metro 19feb2014 Final

1/37

100G in the Metro:

When and Where It Will Be Economical

An Infonetics Research Webinar

Co-produced with JDSU, MRV, and Transmode

The Webinar Will Begin Shortly#100GMetro


2/37

100G in the Metro:

When and Where It Will Be Economical

An Infonetics Research Webinar

Co-produced with JDSU, MRV, and Transmode

#100GMetro


3/37

Todays Speakers

3

Andrew Schmitt

Principal Analyst, Optical

Infonetics Research

JoAnne Emery

Event Director

Infonetics Research

(Moderator)

Scott Wilkinson

Senior Director of Technical

Marketing

MRV

Sten NordellChief Technology Officer

Transmode

Guylain Barlow

Senior Product Manager

JDSU

#100GMetro


4/37

Agenda

4

Service Provider Deployment Plans

3

4

Why Metro 100G Is Different

Metro Pluggable Technology Overview

Deploying 100G in the Metro

Sponsor Approaches

Conclusions

Audience Q&A

12

3

4

5

67

4

#100GMetro


5/37

Deployed Optical WAN Capacity

Deployed bandwidth grew

25% to 30% in past 3 years

100G is not in a bubble; it is

unseating the technology

workhorse of the past decade

Forecast: 100G costs will drop

Only makes sense for long

spans today, used mostly for

10G traffic

Metro applications limited to

either 100G clients or fiberexhaust scenarios

Transition to metro 100G

expected in 2016

Infonetics Research, 10G/40G/100G Optical Transceiv ers Market Size and Fo recasts, 2ndEdit ion, October 20135

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

CY11 CY12 CY13 CY14 CY15 CY16 CY17

TransmissionCapacity(Petabits/sec)

10G 40G 100G Growth rate


6/37

What Service Providers Are Saying

100G crowding out other

speeds within two years

10G still plays a majorrole in the metro

until 2015

10%5%

54%

26%

14%

7%

22%

62%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2013 2016

AverageP

ercent

New Long Reach WDM Installs


7/37

Metro 100G Poised to Jump

Service providers indicate

metro 100G roughly triples

between 2013 and 2015

Core 100G penetrationpeaks by 2016

Metro becomes the source

of most market growth

starting in 2015

Infonetics Research, 40G/100G and ROADM Deployment Strategies: Global Service Provid er Survey, November 2012 & November 2013

Question: What percentage of new installs are

coherent in your metro and core networks?

25%

46%

68%

79%

8%10%

29%

37%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2012 2013 2015 2016

ShareofNewCoherentW

avelengths

Core

Metro

7


8/37

Metro 100G Technology Preferences

Technology not a differentiator

in the metro

Unless it lowers costs!

Pluggable CFP2 perceived as

potentially valuable technology

Service providers want more of

what they already have

Except cheaper

8Infonetics Research, 40G/100G and ROADM Deployment Strategies: Global Serv ice Provider Survey, November 2013

Scale: 1 = not im por tant; 7 = crit ical

7%

14%

18%

18%

21%

36%

71%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Raman amplification

Pluggable CFP based 100G

direct-detect non-coherent module

Advanced modulation formats such as16-QAM for higher spectral efficiency

Pluggable CFP based100G coherent module

Flexible coherent (software selectablemodulation) for reduced sparing

Pluggable CFP2 based100G coherent module

Lower cost 100G hardware identical

to form factor used in long haul

% of Respondents Rating 6 or 7

Desired Technologies for Metro Deployments(Metro Regional Spans of 80km600km)


9/37

Agenda

9


3

4




Sponsor Approaches

Conclusions

Audience Q&A

12

3

4

5

67

9

#100GMetro


10/37

Why 100G in the Metro/Regional Network?

Continuous growth of high capacity video traffic HD and 3D TV drives bandwidth

in metro/regional network

Data center interconnect

Internet Content Providers (ICPs)

Super data centers; Netflix, Facebook, YouTube, iTunes

Increase in mobile broadband through Smartphones and dongles

10Source: Bell Labs, Metro Traffic Growth, December 2013

10


11/37

Extra Challenges in the Metro

Its not just a capacity/cost

question

Space and power

consumption are critical

challenges to fix

Metro 100G isnt just achallenge for Layer 1

Many networks now metro edge /

metro regional P-OTS

10G Ethernet services/backhaulrequire aggregation to 100G

- e.g. CCAP (new combined CMTS

and edge QAM in cable networks)

10G becomes the new 1G client po rt rate, requir ing

aggregation to 100G in the netwo rk and 100G client

por ts also grow rapid ly

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

CY05 CY07 CY09 CY11 CY13 CY15 CY17

Numberofports

Sub 10G (10M-2.5G) 10G 40G 100G

Infonetics:Optical Network Hardw are Market Share and Forecasts, Nov. 2013

11


12/37

100G Solutions Need to Work with theExisting Infrastructure

Over existing amplifiers,

filters, ROADMs, etc.

Coexistence with 10Gand 40G wavelengths

and others such as 16G

Fibre Channel

100G solution

Metro edge / metro

regional P-OTS

Existing amplifiers,

filters, ROADMs

Coexist with 10G,

40G, 16G FC, etc.

12


13/37

The Need for Economic 100GSolutions in the Metro

Current 100G solutions

(e.g., coherent) are too expensive

for metro applications

Long haul economics (many

customers, higher revenue) do

not translate to metro networks

Data center and non-traditional

carrier networks do not require

expensive telecomm-grade 100G

solutions

Standardization of 100G optics

has the promise of reducing costson a 10G rather than a 40G curve

800Gbps+

13

40km

The industry needs a commodity 100G solution

like pluggable optics to bring prices in line as they did with 10G


14/37

Demand on Client-Side Drives Line Side

DWDM Network (Line)Client Network

Long to Ultra-Long Reach

New: Metropolitan area networks

Long-haul terrestrial networks

Ultra-long submarine networks

Short to Medium Reach

Intra-office

Data centers

Enterprise networks

Routers and switches

ROADM

100 GE/OTU 4

Client

Client Transponder Transponder

Client

Metro is pushing the requirements for

lower costs and higher port density

across both Clients and Lines

14


15/37

100 Gbps Classic Tests: Client & LineThis examp le shows elements based on righ t to lef t traf f ic direct ion

Client Side Line Side

ClientSid

e

Client/Network Testing:

Ensure service quality

Ethernet throughput, latency, packet jitter,

bursting

OTN requirements emerging

Infrastructure Tests

Connector inspection and cleaning

OTDR (length, loss, impairments)

NOTE: Dispers ion measurements are not needed on the

cl ient s ide

Basic Infrastructure Testing/Documentation

Connector inspection and cleaning

OTDR (length, loss, impairments)

Advanced Testing

OSNR: Higher sensitivity at 100 G

RAMAN amp link testing (IL/ORL/OTDR)

Chromatic dispersion (CD)

Polarization mode dispersion (PMD)

100 GEOA OA

Demux M

ux

Pluggable

opticsPluggable

optics Pluggable

optics

Fixed or

pluggable

optics

Most common 100 GE Client interface is:

100GBase-LR41310 nm range

(nm) 1295.56 1300.05 1304.58 1309.14

4.5 nm

4 x 25 G

1 signal

Use of DWDM/modulated signals

15

New chal lenge: 100 G pluggable opt ics are more com plexthan at lower rates. New requirement for opt ic s module test ing


16/37

Agenda

16


3

4




Sponsor Approaches

Conclusions

Audience Q&A

12

3

4

5

67

16

#100GMetro


17/37

Current Status of Pluggable 100G Optics

17

Gray optics

Dedicated fiber

Single fiber pair

connection

Singlemode or Multimode

Cannot DWDM

Metro optics

Four DWDM wavelengths

Multi-fiber connection

External mux/demux

Fixed or tunable

Coherent optics

One wavelength

DWDM

Tunable

Extended distancecapability

Gray Optics

Cannot be used with WDM

Require a dedicated fiber

per direction (fiber pair)

Singlemode and multimodeversions available

Multiple wavelengths with

internal mux/demux

10x10Gbps (SR10) and

4x25Gbps (LR4/ER4)

versions

Metro Optics

Can be used with WDM,

including amps and DCM

External WDM mux/demux

required

Can share fiber pair with

other services

Four wavelengths

(4x25Gbps)

Fixed and tunable versions

Coherent Optics

Single wavelength

Can be used in DWDM,

networks with amps

Distance up to 1000km

Tunable wavelengths

Enables the longest

distance and/or highest

bandwidth

Advanced optical

technology reduces or

removes need fordispersion management

Available now from

several vendors in several

versions.

Versions available now.

New versions appearing

with costs rapidly

declining.

Initial versions should

appear in 2014.


18/37

100G Metro Pluggable Optics

An economical solution fornetwork operators needing to

move from 800Gbps to ~2Tbps

per fiber

Currently much less expensive

than coherentand availablefor purchase

Fixed (non-tunable) versions

approaching 5-6x 10G pricing

18

Up to 2Tbps

80 channels x 10Gbps = 800Gbps

20 channels x 100Gbps = 2Tbps

1 wavelength = 1 service

4 wavelengths = 1 service

10G

DWDM

100GMetro

DWDM


19/37

100G PluggablesEvolution over TimeClient optics

CFP so far, evolving to CFP2 (and later CFP4, QSFP28)

CFP2 client optics are a metro enabler: lower cost and higher density

25G I/O is a very challenging technology though

Line Optics (modulated)

Started with fixed optics, moving to pluggable form factors

25G I/O10G I/O

CFP

10 physical

electrical lanes

LR4 to 4 CFP2

4 physical

electrical lanesLR4 to 4

19

CFP CFP4QSFP28

CFP2

Fixed 168-pin MSA

CFP

CFP2 (with

External DSP)

100G O ti D l t i Si C t


20/37

100G Optics Development in Size, Costand Power Consumption

Time

PM-QPSK Coherent

Trx 5x7 OIF module

75W

PM-QPSK Coherent

Trx CFP module

30W

Photonic

integration

and ASIC for

metro spec.

2014 20152013

OIF=Opt ical Internetwork ing Forum

Size

CostPower

consumpt ion

20


21/37

Fully Integrated 100G Pluggable Technology

Clearer demarcation between optical

and digital domain with DSP + ADC

integrated in CFPx

Decreased complexity with no external

analogue high speed interfaces

Less complex design, more futureproof

and faster Time To Market for new line

formats

No need to redesign boards for different

pluggable interfaces with various

coherent transmit/receive optics

More flexibility with support for various

CFPs for long haul coherent, metro

coherent and client optics in any port

Why fully integrated CFPx over loosely coupled?

21

Complex high speedanalogue interfaceDSP needs to

interoperate with

multiple CFP

vendors

CFPxDSP

Loos ely coupled CFPx

Integrated CFPx

DSP CFPx

Traffic unit

Common digital

interface

Traffic unit


22/37

Agenda

22


3

4




Sponsor Approaches

Conclusions

Audience Q&A

12

3

4

5

67

22

#100GMetro


23/37

Datacenter vs. Service Provider Requirements

23

Service Provider

Revenue from transport

Reliability and SLAs drive network design Five 9s transport network requirements

Port density is paramount

Central office is filled with ports

Drive to 100G native ports and 100G transponders

Usually own the fiber infrastructure

Multiple service types on same fibers

Revenue from applications and content

Cost and capacity drive network design Best effort network with retransmit at Layer 3

Cost per port is paramount

Datacenter is filled with storage and processing

Drive to keep 10G ports and use 100G muxponders

Usually lease fiber or capacity from others

Limited service types on the same fibers

Datacenter

Divergence in service requirements is creating a divergence in 100G requirements


24/37

100Gbps Interconnect

24

800GbpsCurrent bandwidth per fiber maxed at 800Gbps

(80 wavelengths x 10Gbps)

Metro 100G optics allow an

upgrade to 2Tbps (20 channels

of 100G) immediately and

cost-effectively

The ultimate goal is cost-effective coherent optics,

allowing up to 8Tbps (80 x 100G) per fiber

2Tbps

8Tbps

Additional fibers provisioned

or jump to a coherent solution

for compatibility and long-term

growth

Datacenter Service Provider


25/37

Network ExamplesLayer 1 and Layer 2

10G (OTU2e)

10G (OTU2e)Nx1GbE

Nx1Gb

E

100G (OTU4)

100G (OTU4)

100GbE

100GbE

MXP MXPTP

TP TP TP

100G (OTU4) 100G (OTU4)

100G (OTU4) 100G (OTU4)100GbE100GbE

Nx10GbE

Nx10GbE

Layer 2 and Layer 1 combined

Layer 1

TP

TP

25


26/37

100 G introduced many innovations, including multilane pluggable optics Metro deployments will increase volumes

100 G interfaces are often (but not limited to) LR4 involvingmultiwavelength client interfaces

The next logical step: Simple method to validate the pluggable optics

Electrical pins

10 (or 4) Tx/Rx lanes

LR4optical

4

CFP/CFP2

My 100 G network shows traffic errors at deployment.

Whats the next step?

Deployment Scenario: Problem Statement

26


27/37

Testing 100G Pluggable Optics: Use Cases

Operator Use CasesTroubleshooting: On network test

errors, initiate troubleshooting by first

testing pluggable optics

Prescreening: Testing pluggable opticsin advance can avoid future issues

Manufacturer Use Cases

Compliance Testing: Ensure that designs meet the criteria

outlined in the standards, such as IEEE

27

Testing Pluggable Optics:


28/37

Testing Pluggable Optics:Anatomy of Requirements

R&D and qualification

require compliance testing

Network deployments

require performance testing

Compliance

Detail Error Rate Performance per lane

Check pattern sensitivity and crosstalk

Stress skew parameters including

dynamic skew and nominal jitter

Verify receiver sensitivity

Functionally verify communications withoptics module (MDIO)

Performance

Focus on Error Rate performance

Test within clock tolerances

Verify operation within specified optical

power range

CFP

CFP228

Clearly define acceptable error rate

performance


29/37

Agenda

29


3

4




Sponsor Approaches

Conclusions

Audience Q&A

12

3

4

5

67

29

#100GMetro

JDSU 100G T t S l ti


30/37

Covering the industry ecosystem

JDSU 100G Test Solutions

Early adopters

requiring depth

Field Deployment &

Troubleshooting

T-BERD

/MTS

R&D Labs

ONT

30

Production

Scale &

efficiency

Services

Protocols

Client I/f

Optical testing

Infrastructure

Portability

& Reliability

OTN

100GE

Fiber Characterization (Loss/ORL/OTDR/Dispersion)

Spectral analysis (Power//OSNR)

Connector Inspection / cleaning

Photonic testing

Optics Compliance& Performance

O tiD i


31/37

OptiDriver:Designed for the Future of 100G

31

100G Muxponder with 100G CFP Pluggable

Optics Slot

&

10x10G SFP+ and 2x40G QSFP+

Pluggable Optics Slots

100G Transponder with SR-10 and ER-4

Gray Optics CFP Pluggable Optics

A family of chassis

optimized for mature 10G

and emerging pluggable

100G solutions

N All l bl M 100G l i


32/37

New All pluggable Metro 100G solution

Interfaces: 1x100G + 12x10G

Coherent CFP line ~800km

Supports LAN-mode (10 G

LAN/100 GbE) and Transponder-

mode (OTU2e/OTU4) on all ports

220G total switching capacity for

full wire-speed switching at all

packet sizes

32

First all pluggable, coherent optics based 100G

metro solution supporting Layer 1 and Layer 2

100G Transpo nder 220G Ethernet Muxp onder100G Muxpo nder

Interfaces: 2x100G


LR-4/LR-10/SR-10 client

CFPs

100GbE & OTU4 support

Interfaces: 1x100G + 10x10G


STM-64/OC-192, 10GbE,

8GFC, OTU2/OTU2e support

100GbE & OTU4 support

A d


33/37

Agenda

33


3

4




Sponsor Approaches

Conclusions

Audience Q&A

12

3

4

5

67

33

#100GMetro

C l i


34/37

Conclusions

Metro 100G does not have the luxury of greenfielddeployments and has a much higher economic bar to

clear to beat 10G

Requirements of datacenters are different from those of

traditional service providers, and they provide the near

term metro 100G market growth

Vendors believe pluggable 100G WDM optics offer the

economics and flexibility to address customerrequirements

34

A d


35/37

Agenda

35


3

4




Sponsor Approaches

Conclusions

Audience Q&A

12

3

4

5

67

35

#100GMetro

A di Q&A


36/37

Audience Q&A

36

Andrew Schmitt

Principal Analyst, Optical

[email protected]

Infonetics Research

JoAnne Emery

Event [email protected]

Infonetics Research

(Moderator)

Scott Wilkinson

Senior Director of TechnicalMarketing

[email protected]

MRV

Sten NordellChief Technology [email protected]

Transmode

Guylain Barlow

Senior Product Manager

[email protected]

JDSU

#100GMetro
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


37/37

Thank YouThis webcast will be available on-demand for 90 days

For additional Infonetics events, visithttps://www.infonetics.com/infonetics-events/

#100GMetro
https://www.infonetics.com/infonetics-events/https://www.infonetics.com/infonetics-events/https://www.infonetics.com/infonetics-events/https://www.infonetics.com/infonetics-events/

2014 Infonetics 100g in the Metro 19feb2014 Final

Documents

Transcript of 2014 Infonetics 100g in the Metro 19feb2014 Final