2014 Business Outlook Survey Results. Business Economic Survey Your Target Market:□ Fargo-Moorhead...
Transcript of 2014 Business Outlook Survey Results. Business Economic Survey Your Target Market:□ Fargo-Moorhead...
2014 Business Outlook Survey Results
Business Economic Survey
Your Target Market: □ Fargo-Moorhead□ Minnesota/ North Dakota □ Midwest □ Nationwide □ International
Number of Employees: □ 1-4 □ 5-19 □ 20-99 □ 100-499 □ 500+
Business Type: □ Agriculture □ Mining □ Construction □ Manufacturing□ Transportation, Warehousing
□ Wholesale Trade □ Retail Trade□ Finance, Insurance, Real Estate
□ Business & Profess. Services □ Health Services
□ Leisure/Hospitality □ Non Profit □ Other ___________
Business Classification:
□ Business to Business
□ Business to Consumer □ Both
Changes in 2012 to 2013 & Expected Changes for 2014Sales Revenue Operating Costs
Capital Expenditures Profitability
Number of Employees Compensation
Prices for Raw Materials Prices Received
Business Segments
____ Surveys Sent
____ Surveys Responses
____ Response Rate
Type of BusinessBusiness/Professional Services
15%
Retail Trade13%
Finance, Insurance, Real Es-tate13%
Other9%
Nonprofit9%
Leisure/Hospitality8%
Construction8%
Health Care7%
Technology7%
Manufacturing5%
Wholesale Trade4%
Agriculture2%
Transportation-Warehousing1%
1-420%
5-1936%
20-9930%
100-49912%
500+2%
Number of Employees
Fargo-Moorhead-West Fargo
43%
Minnesota/ North Dakota
39%
Midwest5%
Nationwide10%
International2%
Target Market
Business Segments
Business Changes from 2012 to 2013
Decrease No Change IncreaseDiffusion
Index*Diff. Index
2011-12
Sales Revenue 18.7% 11.6% 69.7% 51.0% 61.8%Prices Received for Products/Services 7.7% 31.4% 60.9% 53.2% 50.7%
Prices Paid for Raw Materials 2.6% 35.5% 61.9% 59.3% 69.5%Operating Costs as a % of Revenue 14.9% 16.9% 68.2% 53.3% 48.3%
Employee Compensation 2.5% 20.9% 76.6% 74.1% 79.3%
Capital Expenditures 8.3% 40.4% 51.3% 43.0% 52.5%
Profitability 17.5% 17.5% 65.0% 47.5% 50.7%
Number of Employees 7.6% 48.1% 44.3% 36.7% 37.9%
* The Diffusion Index is the percentage of respondents reporting an increase minus the percentage reporting a decrease. A positive index indicates expanding activity, while a negative index indicates declining economic conditions.
Business changes 2011-2014
Sales
Reven
ue
Prices
Rec
eived
Prices
Paid
for M
ater
ials
Ope
ratin
g Cos
ts
Emplo
yee
Compe
nsat
ion
Capita
l Exp
endit
ures
Profit
abilit
y0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
2011-122012-132013-14 (proj)
Percent of Businesses Reporting Large Changes from 2012 to 2013 (7 percent or more)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Percent Reporting 7+ % Increase Percent Reporting 10+ % IncreasePercent Reporting 7+ % Decrease Percent Reporting 10+ % Decrease
Factors Positively Affecting 2013 Performance
Domestic S
ales Incre
ase
A Strong Sta
te Eco
nomy
Lower O
perating Costs
Technology Changes
Politica
l Sta
bility
Less
Domestic C
ompetition
Federa
l Govern
ment Regulations
Intern
ational Sales I
ncrease
Less
Intern
ational Competition
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
Percent Ranking in Top 5 Percent Ranking in Top 3 Percent Ranking #1
Top 5 Factors Positively Affecting PerformanceRank 2012 2013
1 A Strong State Economy Domestic Sales Increase
2 Domestic Sales Increase A Strong State Economy
3 Lower Operating Costs Lower Operating Costs
4 Technology Changes Technology Changes
5 Political Stability Political Stability
Top 5 Factors Negatively Affecting PerformanceRank 2012 2013
1 Higher Operating Costs Staffing Issues
2 Domestic Sales Shortfall Domestic Competition
3 Domestic Competition Higher Operating Costs
4 Other Domestic Sales Shortfall
5 Staffing Issues Other
Expectations of 2014 Performance
Better43%
Worse23%
No Change33%
National Economy
Better73%
Worse3%
No Change23%
Regional Economy
Better69%
Worse7%
No Change24%
Your Business
Factors Expected to Adversely Impact Business in Next 12 Months (average rank in parentheses)
0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%
Percent Ranking in Top 5 Percent Ranking in Top 3 Percent Ranking #1
Oct-0
7
Feb-0
8
Jun-0
8
Oct-0
8
Feb-0
9
Jun-0
9
Oct-0
9
Feb-1
0
Jun-1
0
Oct-1
0
Feb-1
1
Jun-1
1
Oct-1
1
Feb-1
2
Jun-1
2
Oct-1
2
Feb-1
3
Jun-1
3
Oct-1
30
2
4
6
8
10
12
Fargo ND-MN MSANorth DakotaU.S.P
erc
en
t
Historical Unemployment Rate(source: ND Job Service)
Difficulty in Hiring Qualified Workers (average rank in parentheses)
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
Percent Ranking in Top 5 Percent Ranking in Top 3 Percent Ranking #1
Presentation slides available at:
FMWFChamber.com
starionfinancial.com
ndsu.edu/mgmt_mrkt
Special thanks to NDSU Department of Management and Marketing for assistance with survey collection and analysis