Reciprocal Reading Tuesday 19 January 2021 The London Eye ...
2014 – 15 Title I Plan First Reading — January 14, 2014
-
Upload
valentine-lawrence -
Category
Documents
-
view
41 -
download
1
description
Transcript of 2014 – 15 Title I Plan First Reading — January 14, 2014
2014 – 15 Title I Plan
First Reading — January 14, 2014
2
Parent/Community Engagement
November 20, 2013 DAC reviewed student counts
December 18, 2013 DAC reviewed/discussed proposed 2014-15 Title I Plan
and School Allocations DAC formed a subcommittee to review proposed plans Superintendent communicated her intention to keep
the overall site funding at $15.4M January 8, 2013
DAC subcommittee convened with district staff January 15, 2013
DAC reviews subcommittee recommendations and Board discussion
3
2014-15 Title I Entitlement Planning began with a projected decrease of
11% (influenced by sequestration and California’s relative share of national poverty)
Changes have now improved the outlook Effect of sequestration is substantially reduced Revised census information now indicates that
California has slightly increased its share of national poverty
CDE still needs to determine required state-level set-asides before determining district allocations
4
2014-15 Site Allocations
Proposed amount remains at $15.4 million
Threshold remains the same, i.e., 40%
Distribution method remains the same, i.e., sliding scale
Declining enrollment results in the same amount of funding distributed to fewer students
5
Required Reservations
20% PI set-aside for SES and PISC (free tutoring and transportation)
10% set-aside for professional development
1% set-aside for parental involvement
Equitable participation for eligible students in private schools
Equitable participation for homeless students
6
Not-Required Allocations
Parent Involvement activities beyond the minimum requirement
Site support for SSCs and SPSAs Dropout prevention (Goal 5 in LEA
Plan) Administration of required PI
activities, e.g., SES, PISC, parent notifications, PI Year 4 restructuring plans, LEA Plan revision
Assessment and data services Indirect cost billed services
7
Superintendent’s Priorities
Stability at sites — programs and staffing
Continue but fund differently: Class Size Reduction Professional Development tied to the
Common Core State Standards
8
Superintendent’s Recommendations
Keep site allocation amount at prior level
Discontinue Title I funded class size reduction
Spend the legally-mandated minimum amount on professional development (10% of entitlement, including amounts required of schools in program improvement)
9
Exhibits
Proposed 2014-15 Title I Budget
Proposed 2014-15 Title I School Ranking