2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

27
TABLE OF CONTENTS Level 4 Paper 1 exemplar 1 Paper 2 exemplar 19

Transcript of 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

Page 1: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Level 4

Paper 1 exemplar 1

Paper 2 exemplar 19

Page 2: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

Level 4 Paper 1 exemplar

1

Page 3: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

2

Page 4: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

3

Page 5: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

4

Page 6: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

5

Page 7: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

6

Page 8: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

7

Page 9: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

8

Page 10: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

9

Page 11: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

10

Page 12: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

11

Page 13: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

12

Page 14: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

13

Page 15: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

14

Page 16: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

15

Page 17: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

16

Page 18: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

17

Page 19: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

18

Page 20: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

Level 4 Paper 2 exemplar

19

Page 21: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

20

Page 22: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

21

Page 23: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

22

Page 24: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

23

Page 25: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

24

Page 26: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

25

Page 27: 2013 HKDSE Chemistry Level 4 Sample

Comments

The candidate’s answers show a sound understanding of the chemical concepts and principles covered in the curriculum. He/she demonstrates an ability to solve problems involving unfamiliar situations (e.g. the organic structure determination in Paper 2 Q.3(c)).Many of the questions involving chemical calculations (e.g. Paper 1 Qs. 3, 4 and 12; Paper 2 Q.3(b)) are well attempted. His/her answers to the essay questions (Paper 1 Qs.6) show logical presentation of ideas.

.

.

.

26