2013 harmonization of three public health insurance schemes on emergency medical services...
-
Upload
neung-arnat -
Category
Business
-
view
243 -
download
0
Transcript of 2013 harmonization of three public health insurance schemes on emergency medical services...
Naresuan University, Thailand
Harmonization of three public health insurance schemes on
Emergency medical service policy
By
Wannapha Bamrungkhet*; Sutherada Chimnoi**;
Samrit Srithamrongsawat**; Supasit Pannarunothai*
*Naresuan University
**Health Insurance System Research Office
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Outline
Introduction
Methodology
Result
Conclusion
Recommendation
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Thai Health System
Health scheme
Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS)
Social Security Scheme (SSS)
Civil Servant Medical Benefit scheme (CSMBS)
Nature Citizen entitlement Mandatory Fringe benefit
Benefit package
Small number of limited condition Prevention & promotion
Small number of limited condition e.g. plastic surgery
No preventive care No explicit exclusion special bed
Provider Public and private contracting unit for primary care
Public and private hospitals > 100 beds (50% is private)
Public provider only
Payment OP: Capitation IP: DRGs with global budget
Capitation OP and IP (DRG for IP DRG RW>2)
OP: fee for service IP: DRG
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Harmonization of public health insurance schemes on EMS policy • Implemented on 1st April 2012
– Aimed to harmonized management of EMS – Including non-contracted hospital of public health insurance
schemes into the management system – Covered only urgent and emergent patients – National Health Security Office (NHSO) is a clearing house
• Objective of the study – The study aimed to study the effects of harmonization of
three public health insurance schemes on emergency patients
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Methodology
• Telephone interview survey with semi-structured questionnaire – The questionnaire had been tested by 30 persons form three public
health insurance schemes
• Population sample – Sample was emergency patient who accessed to health services
under the policy between August-October 2012
– Sample existed in Emergency Claim online (EMCO)
– Sampling sample by using simple random sampling with personal identity number
Scheme UCS SSS CSMBS Total
Sample 105 95 92 292
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Result
EMS patient age (%) UCS SSS CSMBS Average
1-15 15 0 21 12
16-59 48 91 22 53
60 + 37 9 58 35
Average age of patient 45.6 40.4 53.0 46.2
Standard deviation 26.0 13.4 30.5 24.8
In-patient care (%) 85 80 96 87
Emergent patient (red case) (%) 50 25 25 34
Main reason of accessing to health services
Accidence and trauma 14 14 5 11
General emergency illness 81 79 93 84
Obstetric emergencies. 5 7 1 4
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Policy perception
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
News paper Television Promotionof hospital
Family &friend
Other
Source of policy information perceive (%)
UCS SSS CSMBS
Yes 50%
No 50%
Persons who know the policy
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Expectation on the policy
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
UCS SSS CSMBSDid not expect to be asking for healthinsurance before service (%)Was asked for health insurance beforeservice (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
UCS SSS CSMBS
Knew that the policy covers only emergencycondition (%)
Knew that they must be refer back to theregistered hospital after the emergency (%)
Acceptable if they were sent to the registeredhospital after emergency (%)
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Accessing care channel
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
UCS SSS CSMBS
Know EMS hotline 1669 (%)
Need of EMS 1669 (%)
91%
3% 2% 4%
Health accessing channel
Their ownNGOsEMS 1669Calling to hospital
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e Selecting health service
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Nearest Standard andquality
Withoutwaiting time
Other
Reason selecting health service
UCS SSS CSMBS
90%
10%
UCS
88%
12%
SSS
99%
1% CSMBS
Selected hospital by themselves
Selected hospital by other
Naresuan University, Thailand
Service payment & Financial burden UCS SSS CSMBS Average
Patient who had to pay at the point of service then reimburse the clearing house
94% 91% 88% 91%
financial burden of household 77% 85% 76% 79%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
UCS SSS CSMBS Total
94% 91% 88% 91%
Receiving financial reimbursement (% of patient)
Yes
No
Do not sure
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Satisfaction & Complaint
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
UCS SSS CSMBS
Satify Recommended
11%
89%
UCS
10%
90%
SSS
17%
83%
CSMBS
Hotline No. 1330
Know 1330
Do not know 1330
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Conclusion
Most of emergency patients were working ages and half of them were aware of the policy
Asking for health insurance before treating still existed
Most of patients accessed hospital by themselves, which related that EMS system was limited and needed to be improved
Although the policy promoted that emergency patients could access to health services for free, most of them had to pay at the service point then reimburse.
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Recommendation
Improving and promoting emergency medical service hotline 1669 is important
Setting the process or guideline to prevent payment at the point of service before reimbursement
More focusing on the NHSO 1330
Promoting NHSO hotline 1330 to increase awareness of beneficiary’s rights
Continuous study on the cause of non-perception of people about hotline 1330, and their rights and benefits
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e
Thank you for attention
Naresuan University, Thailand
H
ealt
h In
sura
nce
Sys
tem
Res
earc
h O
ffic
e