2013 11 sci-oa

23
Open Access: Where Are We Now? Science Communication Institute, Seatlle, WA, 15 November 2013 Michael Boock, Center for Digital Scholarship, Oregon State University

description

This paper provides a brief definition of open access, describes where we are at now in terms of open access prevalence and where we might expect to be in the near future. The author differentiates between gold and green open access, describes the growth or diminution of those two forms of OA around the world, provides examples of each form, and describes existing and emerging gold open access funding models. The author also touches on the emergence of federal, state and institutional open access policies with a focus on institutional policies, what they entail and their potential impact. Potential implementation scenarios for the White House Office of Science and Technology open access policy memorandum and the FASTR legislation are also reviewed.

Transcript of 2013 11 sci-oa

Page 1: 2013 11 sci-oa

Open Access: Where Are We Now?

Science Communication Institute, Seatlle, WA, 15 November

2013

Michael Boock, Center for Digital Scholarship, Oregon State University

Page 2: 2013 11 sci-oa

What is Open Access? Green vs. Gold OA Prevalence Gold OA examples, funding models,

new services Green OA examples and policies Mandates

Page 3: 2013 11 sci-oa

GratisOpen Access

Free Full Text Online Access Immediate Permanent

Page 4: 2013 11 sci-oa

Libre Open Access

Reuse Creative Commons licenses

Page 5: 2013 11 sci-oa

The Green box is 7 Billion potential readers on the planet

Yellow box is 15 million knowledge workers

Red Box is 350 subscribing institutions x 500 faculty = 175,000 people

The potential audience for an Open Access

Article…

Used by permission, Peter Binfield

Page 6: 2013 11 sci-oa

Alma Swan. 2010. The Open Access Citation Advantage: Studies and Results to Date. Research on Institutional Repositories.http://works.bepress.com/ir_research/31/

Page 7: 2013 11 sci-oa

Gold Open Access

Immediate access Via an Open Access journal Over 10,000 PLoS BioMedCentral Hindawi

Page 8: 2013 11 sci-oa

Gold OA Funding Models

Funding Models:1. Publishing fees2. No publishing fees3. Hybrid

Page 9: 2013 11 sci-oa

Publishing Fees

AKA Author Pays 1/3 of OA journals, but most articles Article Processing Charge: $300-$5000/article Paid by funding agencies as part of grants Increasingly paid by universities• Study of Open Access Publishing, http://project-soap.eu/highlights-and-

data-of-the-soap-survey-now-available/• SPARC Campus Open Access Funds, http://project-soap.eu/highlights-

and-data-of-the-soap-survey-now-available/

Page 10: 2013 11 sci-oa

No Publishing Fees

2/3s of OA journals Supported by universities/libraries Scholarly societies

Page 11: 2013 11 sci-oa

Hybrid Model

AKA Author Sponsored OA Commercial journals that offer authors OA for

individual article for a fee Double-dipping

Page 12: 2013 11 sci-oa

Other Funding Models

Membership model PeerJ Membership entitles author to publish Must provide additional assistance (peer

review, approval)

Page 13: 2013 11 sci-oa

Open Access Publishing Costs

Less than commercial publishing No legacy operations No printing No sales force Less marketing No legal fees

Page 14: 2013 11 sci-oa

New Developments

Article focus in terms of impact measures Alt Metrics “Wild west of OA publishing” Open Peer Review Post Publication Peer Review

Page 15: 2013 11 sci-oa

Green Open Access

Article available in an open access repository Often with other scholarship Articles also published in journals

Page 16: 2013 11 sci-oa

Open Access Repositories

250 subject-based OA repositories More than 2300 institutional OA policies Green OA predominantly 63% of toll journals allow deposit to

repositories

Page 17: 2013 11 sci-oa

Institutional OA Policies

Page 18: 2013 11 sci-oa

Funder Policies

NIH RCUK White House Office of Science and Technology

Policy State of California Research funded by taxpayer, should be

available to taxpayer

Page 19: 2013 11 sci-oa

White House Office of Science and Technology

Policy Directive America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 Overwhelming positive public feedback Articles and research data resulting from funding from

federal agencies with more than $100 million in annual research and development expenditures to be open access

No implementation strategy adopted yet CHORUS publisher proposal vs. SHARE library proposal

Unfunded mandate

Page 20: 2013 11 sci-oa

Growth of Open Access

25% of all peer-reviewed research is OA Green and Gold

Page 21: 2013 11 sci-oa

Growth of Gold OA

Page 22: 2013 11 sci-oa

Future

Commercial publishers adapting Continued growth of green OA Repository deposit becomes part of publishing

workflow Universities cancel subscriptions More funds available for Gold OA APCs

Page 23: 2013 11 sci-oa

Thank You!

Michael Boock, Associate Professor/Head of the Center for Digital ScholarshipOregon State University Libraries & Press