2012 Semi-Annual Assessor/Instructor Meeting SDI Report January 21, 2012 2012 Semi-Annual...
-
Upload
carmel-richard -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of 2012 Semi-Annual Assessor/Instructor Meeting SDI Report January 21, 2012 2012 Semi-Annual...
2012 Semi-AnnualAssessor/Instructor Meeting
SDI Report
January 21, 2012
2012 Semi-AnnualAssessor/Instructor Meeting
SDI Report
January 21, 2012
Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting
1. Welcome New Instructors2. DCV Instructional Program - Mid Year Report3. New Instructor Minimum Qualifications4. Clinic Report Procedures5. Online Class Evaluation6. Extra Credits for Recert7. Upgrade Requirements - Clarification8. New Initiatives
• Use of USSF Online Learning Modules• Instructor Mentoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)• Referee Dropouts - Retention
9. Assessors/Instructors Test Review
Welcome New Instructors
New Associate Instructors1. Stephen Brownell (9) – South2. Matthew Goff (9)– Central3. Eric Highsmith (9)– North4. Sean Kent (9)– South5. Jeffrey Odenwald (9)- South
Returning Instructors1. Antonio Araiza (9) - South2. Morteza Sajadian (7) - West
Number of New Classes Completed
11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 AVG0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
29
80 78
97
65
5
18 20 21 19
58
149 10
New 8New 9New 12
106 112 127 9439
Number of New Referees
11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 AVG0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
734
1223
1042
1356
1207
119
234 223319
258238 228 206 221 220
New 8New 9New 12
16851896147116851091
New Instructor Qualifications
Associate Instructors• Minimum USSF Grade 7 Referee for 1 year• Recommended by a DCV instructor• Successfully complete the New Instructor Class
Referee Instructors• Minimum USSF Grade 6 Referee for 1 year• USSF Grade 9 Associate Instructor for at least one year• Recommendation through the Instructor Mentoring and
Assessment Program (IMAP)*• Successfully complete the Referee Instructor Class (ITIP)
Clinic Reporting Procedures
• Aimed to make it simple• Don't wait for the few and hold back the class• Not on roster, no badge• Check the "complete" box and then click "save changes"• Update scores email notification
Online Class Evaluation
• As soon as class is completed, mass email will be sent to students with link to the evaluation
• One or two weeks to complete• Results will be shared with instructors of the class
Extra Training Credit for Recert
• New extra recert credits for referees in grades 8, 9, and 12• Referees will get credits for attending qualified DCV sponsored
training• Accumulates 3 credits, referees can attend a shorten version of the
recert clinic (Law changes/memoranda/points of emphasis/test)• Qualified events:
1. VYSA workshop – 1 credit per session (video tape the sessions)
2. Advanced Referee Clinic (after the VYSA workshop) – 3 credits3. DC United Referee Night – 1 credit per night
Upgrade Requirements Clarification
• Calendar year for all requirements (Jan-Dec) • Grade 12 to grade 8 must take the new grade 8 class• Grade 9 to 8 takes the bridge course or a new grade 8 class• Grade 8 to 7 - 17 years old, upgrade clinic (good for one year plus
remaining of the year), 1 assessment, 75 career games at any levels• Grade 7 to grade 6 - 18 years old, State upgrade clinic (good for 2
years plus remaining of the year), 2 assessments as referee and 1 as AR, 100 career games of 45-min halves U 18 and above
• Grade 6 to grade 5 - 19 years old, 150 career games of 45-min halves with 50 adult D1 games, RTS, 2 assessments as referee and 1 as AR.
DCV New Initiatives
• Use of USSF Online Learning Modules• Instructor Mentoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)• Referee Dropouts - Retention
Use of USSF Online Learning Modules
All 17 laws are available on the USSF website.
Site content: Referee/Resource Center/Instruction/Online Training/Referee Training Course
Use of USSF Online Learning Modules
Goal: Transition to incorporate the Online Learning Modules into our new referee classes.
Be sure to give studentsThe Clinic Number.
Instructor Mentoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)
ObjectiveTo assist instructors at Grades 9 (Associate Instructor) and 7 (Referee Instructor) to:• Widen exposure to alternate instructional methods• Increase effectiveness in classroom and field training modules• Respond more confidently to queries regarding the Laws of the
Game, current interpretations, and guidelines for implementation• Explore new techniques for engaging student attention, retention of
knowledge, and understanding• Increase interest in attaining a higher instructor grade• Better understand the individual and collective role in developing
better officials inside and outside the classroom
Instructor Mentoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)
What we look for:• Your strengths and areas for improvement• Your ability to perform the expected tasks involved in the work of the
instructional program at all referee grade levels for which they are qualified
• Your flexibility in developing and sharpening your communications skills
• Your ability to interact cooperatively with referees attending their classes
• Your collaborative efforts with respect to other instructors with whom they may be teamed
Instructor Mentoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)
Evaluation is on:Associate and Referee Instructors• Communication and Platform Skills• Knowledge of the Law• Staying on Topic• Miscellaneous Matters• Use of Appropriate and Effective Classroom Materials• Use of Active Participation• Balanced and Respectful Approach to Students
Referee Instructors• Effective Use of Assisting Instructors• Overall Management of the Clinic
Instructor Mentoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)
Evaluation Time Table:• Once every two years, or• Requests from Instructors for upgrade or personal development
In case you disagree with the assessment:You may contact the SDI to request a discussion of the results. If a resolution is not possible and the subject instructor continues to disagree, the SDI may, at his or her discretion, assign a second, different IMAP team member to conduct a second evaluation.
2007-2010 Dropouts vs New Referees
Grades 07-08 Dropouts
2008 New
Referees
08-09 Dropouts
2009 New
Referees
09-10 Dropouts
2010 New
Referees
8 1263 1356 2104 1043 1187 1223
9 245 319 223 222 234
12 217 221 206 214 228
Total 1725 1896 2104 1472 1623 1685
2007-2010 Dropouts vs New Referees
07-08 Dropouts 08 New Referees 08-09 Dropouts 09 New Referees 09-10 Dropouts 10 New Referees0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
12631356
2104
1043
1187 1223
245319
223 222 234217 221 206 214 228
Grade 8Grade 9Grade 12
2007-2008 Referee Dropoutsby Years of Experience
0.41.2 6.1
41.0
51.2
Grade 923 86
139
359
600
Grade 8
4 years3 years2 years1 year0 year
634
110
67
Grade 12
2007-2008 Referee Drop-outsby Age Groups
12 under
13-14 15-16 17-19 20-30 31-40 41-50 51+0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Grade 8
4 years3 years2 years1 year0 year
12 under 13-14 15-16 17-19 20-30 31-40 41-50 51+0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Grade 9
20-30 31-40 41-50 51+0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Grade 12
4 years3 years2 years1 year0 year
2008-2009 Referee Drop-outsby Years of Experience
73 104
260
632
934
Grade 8
4years3 years2 years 1 year0 year
2008-2009 Grade 8 Referee Dropoutsby Age Groups
12-under 13-14 15-16 17-19 20-30 31-40 41-50 over 510
50
100
150
200
250
300
4years3 years2 years 1 year0 year
2009-2010 Referee Dropoutsby Years of Experience
4 12 154
687
315
Grade 8
4years3 years2 years 1 year0 year
238
141
23
Grade 12
1 27
113
80
Grade 9
2009-2010 Referee Drop-outsby Age Groups by Years of Experience
12-under
13-14 15-16 17-19 20-30 31-40 41-50 over 510
20406080
100120140160180200
Grade 8
4years3 years2 years 1 year0 year
12-under 13-14 15-16 17-19 20-30 31-40 41-50 over 510
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Grade 9
20-30 31-40 41-50 over 510
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Grade 12
4years3 years2 years 1 year0 year
2009-2010 Grade 8 Referee Dropoutsby Age Groups/Years of Experience
22
Under 124
80
63
13-141 46
193
69
15-16
2 751
182
71
17-191 4
22
72
53
20-305
28
13
31-40
1 11
56
29
41-5015
74
15
Over 51
4years3 years2 years 1 year0 year
Referee Drop-outs and Retention
What did we learn?• Most dropouts occurred in the first 2 years• Age 15 and up ventured into the 3rd year• How to protect our new referees?
• Good training• Closely monitored mentoring• Appropriate assignments
• Further study/exit survey
Assessor/Instructor Test Review
• 84 took the test, 9 incomplete• Average Scores - 39.46 (78.92%)
• Assessors - 40.56 (81.12%)• Instructors - 40.43 (80.86%)• Both - 40.78 (81.56%)
Assessor/Instructor Test Review10th - Question 35 (29%)
ATR Law 14, section 14.11 Other Violations At A Penalty Kick Although the referee is expected to allow a penalty kick to proceed despite a violation of Law 14 (see Advice 14.9), this is not the case if a player violates some other Law before the ball is put into play. Specifically, if a player commits violent misconduct before the penalty kick occurs, the referee must stop further action, send off the offending player, and restart the penalty kick from the beginning.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review9th - Question 31 (32%)
ATR Law 13, section 13.9 Signal for Indirect Free Kick If the referee fails either to give the correct signal for an indirect free kick or to hold it for the required period of time, the indirect free kick must be retaken, regardless of the original outcome.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review8th - Question 4 (33%)
ATR – Law 3, section 3.6 Allowing Substitutions and Adding Time - If, before the start of a match played under the rules of a competition, a player is replaced by a named substitute without the referee having been notified, this substitute, now a player, is permitted to play, but should be cautioned for entering the field of play without the permission of the referee. This is considered to be an improper manipulation of the roster, rather than a substitution, and does not count against the number of substitutions the team is permitted to use.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review7th - Question 10 (33%)
ATR Law 4, section 4.6 Incorrect Uniform or Equipment. The inspection to confirm that the correction has been made is conducted by the referee or, if delegated by the referee in the pregame conference, by the fourth official or an assistant referee if a fourth official has not been appointed. The player must receive a signal from the referee before actually re-entering the field and may do so only during a stoppage.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review6th - Question 6 (34%)
ATR – Law 3, section 3.12 Number of Player During Kicks from the Penalty Mark - The “reduce to equate” principle applies only between the time regular or extra time has ended and the actual taking of kicks from the penalty mark has begun.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review5th - Question 18 (34%)
ATR – Law 12, section 12.6 Striking - If the player’s action was not a foul—because the target of the striking was off the field at the time or the target of the action was not an opponent—the misconduct (violent conduct) would be punished by an indirect free kick where the player committing the striking was located.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review4th - Question 46 (37%)
USSF Position Paper, October 24, 2011 – A player temporarily off the field at the end of regular play who is declared unable to return after regular play has ended but before the first kick from the mark is taken may be substituted for (if the team has not used all its allowed substitutions) and will not reduce the number of eligible players for that team.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review3rd - Question 2 (39%)
ATR – Law 1, section 1.6 No Player Modifications of the Field - a corner flag which cannot be repositioned upright in a stable manner and which would interfere with the normal taking of a corner kick, may be temporarily held upright until the corner kick is completed.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review2nd - Question 29 (39%)
ATR Law 12, section 12.37 Judging an Obvious Goal Scoring Opportunity deny a goal scoring opportunity are not limited to those punishable by a direct free kick or penalty kick but may include misconduct or those fouls for which the restart is an indirect free kick.
Assessor/Instructor Test Review1st - Question 49 (42%)
ATR Law 13, section 13.3 Enforcing the Required Distance – If the referee decides to enforce the required distance, an opponent who moves closer to the spot of the kick (from any direction) before it is taken must be cautioned and shown the yellow card if the referee has delayed the restart to ensure that the opponents are at the minimum distance.
1. Welcome New Instructors2. DCV Instructional Program - Mid Year Report3. New Instructor Minimum Qualifications4. Clinic Report Procedures5. Online Class Evaluation6. Extra Credits for Recert7. Upgrade Requirements - Clarification8. New Initiatives
• Use of USSF Online Learning Modules• Instructor Mentoring and Assessment Program (IMAP)• Referee Dropouts - Retention
9. Assessors/Instructors Test Review
Assessor/Instructor Semi-Annual Meeting