2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE...
Transcript of 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE...
![Page 1: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2012AnnualReport Officeofthe
ICBCFairnessCommissioner
PeterBurns,Q.C. ICBCFairnessCommissioner
PublishedApril2013
![Page 2: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
WhoistheICBCFairnessCommissioner?
PeterBurns,Q.C.,wasProfessorofLawattheUniversityofBritishColumbia,wherehewasDeanofLawfrom1981to1992.HewasappointedQueen’sCounselin1984.Hisprimaryareasofteachingandresearchincludecriminallaw,torts,internationalcriminallaw,andinternationalhumanrights.HeretiredfromtheFacultyofLawin2003,butcontinuestoholdtherankofDeanemeritusandProfessoremeritus.
HehasalsoservedontheBCLawReformCommissionandwasaboardmemberoftheBCInternationalCommercialArbitrationCentrefor10years.
Hehasbeenaconsultanttovariousbranchesofgovernment,particularlyinthefieldsofInternationalHumanRightsandLawReform.HewasappointedtotheBoardofDirectorsoftheInternationalCentreforCriminalLawReformandCriminalJusticePolicy(Vancouver)in1982,isaformerPresidentoftheInternationalSocietyfortheReformofCriminalLaw,andwasamemberoftheUNOrganizationCommitteeagainstTorturefrom1987to2003,servingasChairfrom1988to2003.
HebeganhisappointmentasICBCFairnessCommissionerinApril2005.
![Page 3: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
FromtheFairnessCommissioner:ThevalueofaFairnessCommissioner’sofficeaspartofastatutorymotorvehicleinsurancecorporation,withamonopolyoveraportionofitsbusinessactivities,isreflectedinpartinthenumberofcasesthatitdealswith.Inthepastasteadystateofbetween150to185newcaseshastraditionallyreachedtheFairnessCommissioner’soffice,butin2012thenumberreached213.Thesecasesdonotreflectthecompletepicture,asover64percentofthecasesareresolvedbytheInsuranceCorporationofBritishColumbia(ICBC)CustomerRelationsdepartmenttothesatisfactionofthecustomeranddonotreachmeforreview.Aswell,sometimesIrefercasesbacktotheCustomerRelationsdepartment,withaviewtohavingICBCreviewitsdecision.Eachyear,severaloftheseresultindifferentdecisionsbeingreachedbytheCorporation,againtothesatisfactionofthecustomerconcerned.IamadvisedthatICBCsellsapproximately3millionpolicies,processesabout1.4milliondriver’slicencetransactions,anddealswith1millionclaims,annually.Againstthebackdropofthestatisticsofthisreport,againonethingstandsout.TheoverwhelmingmajorityofdecisionstakenbyICBCemployeesandagentsintheirdealingswiththeCorporation’scustomersarereasonableandfair.EveninthosecasesthatIdealtwithin2012,onlyonerequiredaformalrecommendationbaseduponalackoffairnessinthedecision‐makingprocessorthereasonablenessofthedecisionitself.Itisworthemphasizingthatmyjurisdictiongoestoproceduralfairnessonly.HastheCorporationinitsapplicationofitspoliciesandpracticesdealtwithacustomerfairly?Arethesepoliciesandpracticesfair?Ihavenojurisdictiontogobehindthestatutoryschemeitself.NorcanIsubstitutemyviewofwhatshouldhavebeenthedecisiontakenbytheCorporation,unlessIconcludethatitwasunreasonableinthecircumstances.IamverypleasedtoreporttotheBoardthatinthecasethatIreferredbackforanotherreviewtheresponseofICBCwasunreservedlypositive.Ineachinstance,appropriatechangestodecisionsorpracticeshavebeenmadeandthishasledtoabetterresultforthecustomer.In2012,therewerefivesuchcases,summarizedinAppendixB.IwouldalsoliketoexpressmyappreciationtothestaffoftheCorporation.Theyhavebeenpatient,instructive,andaboveall,cooperative,inpursuingthemissionoftheFairnessCommissioner’sOffice.________________________________PeterBurns,Q.C.ICBCFairnessCommissioner
![Page 4: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
ANNUALREPORTOFTHEICBCFAIRNESSCOMMISSIONER
April2013
TABLEOFCONTENTS Page ICBCFairnessCommissioner 2 FromtheCommissioner 31. Introduction 5 2. MissionStatement 53. RoleandAuthority 54. Whatistheprocess? 65. Highlightsof2012 86. FairnessCommissioner2012Statistics 9
AppendixA:RecommendationmadebytheFairnessCommissioner 14AppendixB:CasesresolvedbytheFairnessCommissionerwithout arecommendation 19AppendixC:CasesresolvedbyICBC’sCustomerRelationsdepartment 23
AppendixD:Selectcases 26 AppendixE:Examplesofnon‐jurisdictionalcases 43 AppendixF:Statisticsfrom2010–2012 46
AppendixG:TermsofReferencefortheICBCFairnessCommissioner 48
![Page 5: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
IntroductionTheAnnualReportoftheICBCFairnessCommissionerisasummaryofhisactivitiesin2012.ThereportisarequirementoftheFairnessCommissioner’sTermsofReference(AppendixF).Thisreportincludes:
theconceptandelementsoftheOfficeoftheICBCFairnessCommissioner,withsomeexamplesofcustomercomplaintsandresolvedcases
statisticsfrom2012 TermsofReferencefortheICBC
FairnessCommissioner
MissionStatementToensurethatcustomersaffectedbyICBC'sproducts,servicesordecisionsaretreatedfairlyintermsofprocessandadministration.
RoleandAuthorityTheFairnessCommissioner’sroleistoinvestigate,conductreviews,andmakefindingsandrecommendationstoICBCmanagementand/ortheBoardofDirectorsregardingunresolvedcustomercomplaints.ThisincludesallcomplaintsinreferencetothefairnessofanICBCdecision,actionorpracticewhereICBCitselfhasnotsatisfiedthecustomerthroughitsinternalcomplaintresolutionprocess.TheOfficeoftheFairnessCommissionerislimitedinjurisdictionastheCommissionerdealswithissuesoffairnessintermsofprocessoradministration.TheCommissionerdoesnothavejurisdictiontodealwithdisputesthatrelatesolelytotheamountofafinalpaymentortheassessmentofliability.Thosearematterswherethecustomer,inmostinstances,hasarighttoaClaimsAssessmentReviewwithrespecttoliabilityoranArbitrationProcesswithrespecttovehicledamage.TheCommissionerdoesretainjurisdictiontodealwithanyabsenceoffairnessineitheroftheseprocesses.TheCommissionerhasthepowertoinsistontheproductionofanydocumentsorotherinformationfromICBCwhichheconsidersnecessarytoconductaninvestigationand,ifnecessary,takeevidenceunderoathorotherwisefromthecustomerorarepresentativeofICBC.
![Page 6: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
TheCommissionermustbe:
totallyindependent,inparticular,heisindependentofICBCandanypriordecisionsthatmayhavebeenmadebyICBC
impartialinallrespects accessibletothepublicinwritingandononline responsivetothosethatwritetohim
Whatistheprocess?
Customer
• Customer writestotheFairnessCommissionerwithhis/herconcern.
Fairness Commissioner
• IfICBC'sCustomerRelationsdepartmenthasnotpreviouslyreviewedthecustomer'sconcern,theFairnessCommissionerwillrequestthatCustomerRelationsexaminethecustomer’sissueandresponddirectlytothecustomer.
Customer Relations advisor
• AnICBCCustomerRelationsadvisorreviews,investigatesandrespondstothecustomer.
Customer
• Ifthecustomerfeelsthathis/herconcernshavenotbeenfullyaddressedbyICBC,thecustomercanasktheFairnessCommissionerforareviewanddecision.
Fairness Commissioner
Liaison
• TheCustomerRelationsdepartmentprovidesadetailedsummaryreport(explainingthecustomer'sconcernandICBC'sattemptstoresolvetheissue)fortheFairnessCommissioner.
Fairness Commissioner
• TheFairnessCommissionerreviewsthecustomer'sconcernsalongwithICBC'ssummaryreport.HemayrequestameetingwithrelevantICBCstafformanagersinordertofullyunderstandICBC'spolicies,proceduresordecisions.TheFairnessCommissionerprovidesawrittendecisiontothecustomerandICBC.
![Page 7: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Uponcompletionofhisreview,theFairnessCommissionermay:
referthematterbacktoICBCforreconsideration,asincasessummarizedinAppendixB.
makearecommendationtoICBCthatthecomplaintberesolvedinsuchmannerashedeemsappropriate,assummarizedinAppendixA.ShouldICBCrejecttheFairnessCommissioner’srecommendation,heisempoweredtotakethematterdirectlytotheBoardofDirectorsofICBC.IftheBoardrejectstherecommendation,theFairnessCommissionerisempoweredtotakethatmattertothepublicthroughthepresswhereappropriate.
dismissthecomplaintifhefindsnounfairnessonthepartofICBCoritsemployees,
asincasessummarizedinAppendixD.
![Page 8: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Highlightsof2012Therewereanumberofimportanteventswhichtookplacein2012:1) TheFairnessCommissionermadeoneformalrecommendationtoICBCin2012.This
caseissummarizedinAppendixA.Incontrast,theFairnessCommissionermadenorecommendationsin2011,onerecommendationinboth2010and2009,andfiverecommendationsin2008.
2) TheFairnessCommissionerreferredfivecasesbacktoICBCin2012,whichwereresolvedwithoutthenecessityofaformalrecommendation(seeAppendixB).
3) 2012wasthefirstfull‐yearthatcustomerswereabletocontacttheFairness
Commissionerusinganonlinecomplaintform.ThisformwasaddedtotheFairnessCommissioner’swebsiteonJuly5,2011,andnow55percentofcustomerswishingtocontacttheFairnessCommissionerusetheonlineforminsteadofusingregularmail.
4) TheFairnessCommissionerreceivedatotalof213complaintlettersin2012.Thiswas
significantlyhigherthanpreviousyearsandthisincreasecanbemainlyattributedtotheriseintheuseoftheonlinecomplaintform.TheFairnessCommissionerreceived116onlinecomplaintsin2012comparedto47in2011(JulytoDecember2011).ThenumberofcomplaintsreviewedbytheFairnessCommissioneralsoincreasedin2012(98casescomparedto86casesin2011).Seegraphsonpage9.
5) ChangesmadetotheFairnessCommissioner’swebsite(www.icbc.com/about‐
ICBC/raising‐concerns/fairness_commissioner)inJune2011resultedinanotableincreaseinvisitsin2012comparedtoprioryears.Therewere3,129visitstothewebsitein2012;1,601visitsin2011;and528visitsin2010.ThesechangesalsolikelyhadaninfluenceintheincreaseinthenumberofcomplaintlettersreceivedbytheFairnessCommissionerin2012.
![Page 9: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
FairnessCommissionerOpenedandClosedcases(2009to2012)
ComplaintsreviewedbytheFairnessCommissioner(2009to2012)
*In2010,ICBC’sCustomerRelationsdepartmentwasabletoresolve64%ofcomplaintspriortoinvolvementoftheFairnessCommissioner.
Opened
Closed0
50
100
150
200
250
20092010
20112012
186
168
141
213183
203
154
221
Opened
Closed
0
20
40
60
80
100
20092010
20112012
88
68 *
86
98
![Page 10: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
WhatdoICBCcustomerswritetotheFairnessCommissionerabout? In2012,themajorityofcustomerswritingtotheFairnessCommissionerhadconcernswithoneofthefollowingICBCbusinessareas:ClaimsServices,AccountServices(formerlyknownasCustomerCollections),Autoplan,andDriverLicensing.Thefollowingchartsprovideanillustrativeviewof2012closedfilesbyissuetypeandpercentagesfromthesemainbusinessareas.(Note:Percentagesmaynotsumto100percentduetorounding).Statisticsfor2010‐2012summarizedinAppendixE.FairnessCommissionerCasesbyBusinessArea
Autoplan23%
ClaimsServices40%
AccountServices16%
DriverLicensing12%
PrivacyandFOI1%
RoadSafety1% ServiceQuality3%
VehicleLicensingandRegistration
2%
NotICBC1%
![Page 11: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
ClaimsServicesWhataspectoftheclaimsexperienceconcernedthecustomer?
DriverLicensingWhatprocessorprogramwithinthedriverlicensingtransactionconcernedthecustomer?
claimhandling8%
coveragedenied32%
externalserviceproviders1%
hitandrun~uninsured
4%injury
management7%
liability19%
rentalvehicle(lossofuse)1%
repairs16%
settlement5%
TotalLoss3%TotalTheft
(stolenvehicles)4%
IDrequirements18%
GraduatedLicensing
Program15%
refusetoissue(RTI)18%
vehicle&driverrecords4%
driver'slicencestatus4%
issuanceofdriver'slicence
11%
movingin/outofprovince4%
Exams26%
![Page 12: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
AutoplanWhatinsurancerelatedtransactionconcernedthecustomer?
AccountServices Whattypeofdebtrelatedactivityconcernedthecustomer?
ICBCPaymentPlanfinancing
6%
Claim‐RatedScale(CRS)33%
insurancecoverage10%policydetails
10%
premiumdiscounts4%
MultipleCrash
Premium2%
cancellationsandrefunds21%
cost12%
transactions2%
DriverPointPremium(DPP)
debt17%
claimrecoverydebt30%
DriverRiskPremium(DRP)
debt17%
finesdebt11%
insurancepremiumdebt
22%
MultipleCrashPremium3%
![Page 13: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
FairnessCommissioner(FC)caseresolutionfrom2009–2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 CustomerRelationsresolvedthemattertothecustomer’ssatisfaction
92 50% 129 64% 63 41%* 119 54%
ReviewedbytheFCwithadeterminationofnounfairness
67 36% 52 25% 70 45% 66 30%
ReviewedbytheFCwitharecommendationthatwasimplementedbyICBC
1 1% 1 1% 1 0%
ResolutionfacilitatedbytheFC 1 1% 5 2% 3 2% 5 2%
AnotherICBCdepartmentresolvedthemattertothecustomer’ssatisfaction
1 0%
DeterminedtobeoutsidethejurisdictionoftheFC
19 10% 10 5% 15 10% 25 11%
Customerabandonedorwithdrewtheirconcern 5 3% 6 3% 3 2% 4 2%
Total 183 203 154 221
Note:Percentagesmaynotsumto100%duetorounding*In2011,ICBC’sCustomerRelationsdepartmentmadechangestoitsFairnessCommissionerfilemanagementprocesswhichresultedinasmallernumberoffileopeningsandasaconsequencethepercentageoffilesresolvedbytheCustomerRelationsdepartmentwaslowerthaninpreviousyears.
![Page 14: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
AppendixA:RecommendationmadebytheFairnessCommissionerTherewasonecasein2012(C208547)wheretheFairnessCommissionermadeaformalrecommendation.Afterareviewofthisvery“convulated”case,theCommissionerfoundthatICBChadtreatedthecustomerunfairlyinthatithadsentsomepersonalcorrespondencetothecustomertoanincorrectaddress.TheCommissionerrecommendedthatICBCapologizetothecustomerforthiserror.ICBCagreedwiththerecommendationandsentanapologytothecustomer.
ThefollowingisasummaryoftheissueandtheFairnessCommmisioner’sinvestigation,analysis,recommendation,andtheresolution.Issue:CustomerwrotetotheFairnessCommissionerbecausehewasunhappyinthewayICBChaddealtwithhisDriverPenaltyPoint(DPP)premiums.InvestigationandAnalysis:Inreachinghisdecision,theFairnessCommissionerreviewedthevariouspointsandatimelinethatthecustomerhadsubmittedaswellasmaterialcontainedinafilepreparedbyICBCwhichincludedtheregulatorybasisfortheDPPprocessandcorrespondencebetweenthecustomerandICBC.
![Page 15: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Uponcompletionofhisreview,theCommissionerwrotetothecustomerandstatedthat:
“Thefactsofyourcasearequiteconvoluted.Havinganalyzedthematerialinthefileseveraltimes,includingyourcommentsandassertionsrelatingtothem,Iampersuadedthatthesummaryoffactscontainedinthelettertoyou,datedDecember22,2010,fromCatherineDixon,CustomerRelationsAdvisor,isanaccurateportrayaloftheeventsleadinguptoyourrequestforareview.YoumustbearinmindthatICBCactsuponfactsitfindstoexistasprobabilitiesandnotfactsthatareprovenbeyondareasonabledoubt.Itwillnotactuponmerespeculation,butonlyuponprobabilities.IconcludethatMs.Dixon'sletteraccuratelysetsouttheprobableeventsleadinguptothisapplicationforaFairnessreview.IfIunderstandyourargumentthatyouhavebeendealtwithunfairlybytheCorporation,itisthis:therearethreeissuesthatyouraiseinsupportofyourunfairnessclaim.1. Yourdriverpenaltypointssurcharge(DPP)wasengenderedbytwotraffic
offenseticketsissuedtoyouonSeptember8,2008,andOctober24,2008,respectively.YousaythattheOctober24,2008,ticketwaserroneouslyattributedtoyoubecauseonthatdateyouwereinWashingtonandnotinBritishColumbia.YouwereadvisedbyanemployeeofICBC,“Danny”,thattherewasaprocessavailabletoreviewtheintegrityofticketswhereadriverisallegingthatsomeoneimpersonatedhimorheratthetime.Youinitiatedthisprocesswhichinvolvedtheissuingofficerreviewingthematter.InyourcasetheissuingofficerwassatisfiedforthereasonssummarizedbyMs.Dixoninherlettertoyou,datedDecember22,2010,thattheviolationtickethadbeenissuedtoyou.YouwerenotifiedinwritingbyaletterdatedAugust21,2009,thatyourimpersonationreviewhadbeenunsuccessful.Unfortunately,thatformletteradvisedyoutoproceedtotheProvincialCourtifyouwantedtocontinuetoappealyourticket.Thiswasmisleading,becauseonlytheSupremeCourtofthisprovincehasjurisdictiontotakeanappealwhereaconvictionrelatingtoaparticulartickethasbeenentered.Sincethefinewasnotpaidonthatticketthisistreatedasaconvictioninrelationtoit.Aconvictionwasalsoenteredbecauseyoudidnotenteranoticeofintentiontodisputetheticketwithinthe30dayperiodallowed.Inthisrespectyoualsosaythat"Lisa"toldyoutoappealtotheProvincialCourt,butthisisnotborneoutbythefileinformationwhichindicatesthatLisadirectedyoutotheProvincialCourttodeterminewhatyournextstepwouldbe,nottotaketheformalappealthere.ThismatteronlybecameproblematicbecauseyouapparentlylodgedanappealintheProvincialCourtwhichwasreceivedthereandonlylaterwastheappropriatecourtjurisdictionresolved.
Youarguethatyouweredirectedintotheimpersonationreviewprocessof
ICBCbyDanny,whichdelayedyouropportunitytoproperlyappealthe
![Page 16: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
ticket,andwereerroneouslydirectedtotheProvincialCourtwhichagaindelayedyouropportunitytolodgeanappealintheSupremeCourt.OnthematerialpresentedtomeIcannotconcludethatDanny,asaprobability,insistedthatyouengagewiththeimpersonationreviewprocess.Thefileindicatesthatheadvisedyouoftheoptionandsentyoutheformstofillin.Youhadtheoptionofparticipatinginitornot.So,Iputasideyourargumentbaseduponyourinvolvementintheimpersonationreviewprocess.
IalsodonotfindthatyouhavedemonstratedasaprobabilitythatLisa
directedyoutotheProvincialCourtforthepurposeofanappealtothatcourt.Thefilemakesitquiteclearthatshedirectedyoutheretodeterminewhatyouroptionswere.Iagreethattheletteryoureceivedaftertheimpersonationreviewprocesswasmisleading,butitshouldhavebeenresolvedintheCourtRegistrywhenyoufiledyourappeal.TheCorporationhassincechangedthatformlettertoaccuratelyreflectthejurisdictionoftherespectivecourts.Inmyopinionthelettertoyou,datedAugust21,2009,wasmisleadingandunfairtoyou.But,inherletterofDecember22,2010,Ms.DixonapologizedtoyouinthisrespectandarrangedtoremovecertaininterestowingfromyourDPPpremiumandtoissueyousixmonthsinsuranceuponspecificterms.Inmyopinionthissatisfactorilydealtwiththeissue.
2. Youtalkof"harassingandthreateningnotices"fromICBCandcomplainthat
muchofyourcorrespondencewasnotrespondedtoinatimelyfashion. The"harassingandthreateningnotices"arestandardnoticesthatICBC
forwardstocustomersinyourcircumstances.InmyopinionthepracticeofICBCusingthesenoticesindealingwithcustomerswhoareinarrearsisnotunfair.Thematteroftimelyresponseisnotoneoffairness,becauseyoudidnotindicatethatyousufferedanylossotherthanaggravation,whichwealldowhenwethinkthatanother,inthiscasetheCorporation,isnotdealingwithamatterasefficientlyaswethinkitshould.Thisisreallyamatterofcustomerserviceandnotoneoffairness.SoIputitaside.
3. Therealcomplaintthatyouhave,andtheonethathascausedmethemost
difficulty,relatestothefactthatonepieceofcorrespondencerelatingtothe(initially)unpaidtrafficticketandaDPPinvoicewassenttoyouatanaddressonT.Road,Abbotsford,insteadofyourS.AvenueaddressinAbbotsford.TheT.Roadaddresswasatthattimetheaddressofyourestrangedwife.Forwhateverreason,shepaidtheOctober24,2008,ticketwithoutyourauthority.IfIunderstandthereasonwhyyouthinkthiserroronthepartoftheCorporationisunfairtoyou,itisthattheoutstandinginvoiceledtosubsequentdisharmoniouscommunicationsbetweenyouandyourestrangedspouse.Youarguethatthisconstitutesaninvasionofyourprivacy,andaconstitutionalinvasionofprivacyatthat!
![Page 17: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
AsaFairnessCommissionerIdonotmakedeterminationsthatareessentiallylegalinnature.So,Iwillputasideyourargumentconcerningyoubeingthevictimofaconstitutionalbreachofprivacy,thisissuecouldonlyberesolvedbyacourt.But,inthisprovincethereislegislationdealingwiththatmatteranditrequires,amongotherthings,forapersonalleginganinvasionofprivacytoestablishthatitwasintentionalandthatheorshehassuffereddamageasaresult.Theletterdidgotothewrongaddress,butitwasnotintendedtoinvadeyourprivacy.Aswell,youhavenotdemonstratedthatyouhavesufferedanydamageasaresultofitgoingtothewrongaddress.Whyitwenttothewrongaddressremainsamystery.
IaskedtheCustomerServiceDepartmentofICBCtotrackitdownandadvise
me.Afterseveraldaysofreviewingcomputerthreads,ICBCconcluded"thereissomesortofsystemissuethatwecan'ttracethatledtothelettergoingtotheotheraddress".ItobviouslywasrelatedtothefactthatthecarlocatedattheT.Roadaddress,whichwasbeingdrivenbyyourex‐wife,wasregisteredinherandyourjointnames.
IampersuadedthatICBChasdoneallthatitcantoascertainjusthowthat
letterwassenttothewrongaddressbut,canitbesaidthatbysendingthelettertotheT.RoadaddressthatICBCwasdealingwithyouunfairly?Itwasinallprobabilitycareless,butwasitunfair?MyopinionisthatitwasunfairinthesensethatitwasquiteunreasonabletoforwardsuchcorrespondencetoanotheraddresswhenyourS.Avenueaddresshadbeenclearlydesignatedastheappropriateoneformattersrelatingtoyourmotorvehicleandlicensing.Thematerialinthecorrespondencewassensitiveinnature,butICBCcouldnothaveanticipatedthatitwouldbereceivedbyyourspouseduringdivorceproceedingsandopenedbyherwhenclearlyaddressedtoyou.Also,youhavenotdemonstratedtheerrorbytheCorporationcausedyouanyparticularloss,norhaveyoudemonstratedthatitaffectedanyofyouropportunitiestoappealtheticket.ItwascertainlyanadditionalaggravationtowhatyouperceivetobeanumberofcustomerservicefailuresonthepartoftheCorporationandforthatIamgoingtorecommendthatICBCissueyouanapology.”
![Page 18: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Recommendation: MyconclusionisthatyouhavebeenunfairlydealtwithinoneunresolvedrespectbytheCorporationandyouareentitledtoanapologyinthatregard.ThisistherecommendationthatIwillmaketotheCorporation.IfyouaredissatisfiedwithmydecisionyoucouldtakeyourcasetotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown,ortothecourtsofthisprovince.
Resolution: GiventheFairnessCommissioner’srecommendation,ICBCsentthefollowingapologylettertothecustomeronSeptember17,2012: “DearMr.S:
IhavereceivedacopyoftheAugust31,2012decisionfromMr.PeterBurns,ICBCFairnessCommissioner.TheCommissionerconcludedthatanapologyiswarrantedforICBCmistakenlysendingcorrespondencemeantforyourpersonalattentiontothewrongaddress.
Westrivetomaintainahighstandardofcustomerservice.Withrespecttothelettersenttoanincorrectaddress,pleaseacceptmyapologyonbehalfofICBCforthisstandardnotbeingmet.
Yourstruly, BobSaito Manager,CustomerRelationsandReviewServices”
![Page 19: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
AppendixB:CasesresolvedbytheFairnessCommissionerwithoutarecommendationIn2012,therewerefivecaseswheretheFairnessCommissionerdirectlyassistedwiththeoutcome,butwasnotrequiredtowritearecommendationlettertoICBCinordertoassistthecustomer.ThefollowingaresummariesoftheissuesandtheFairnessCommmisioner’sinvestigations,analyses,andtheresolutions.
Case1(C212091): Issue:CustomerwrotetotheFairnessCommissionerbecausehewasunhappythatICBChaddeniedabackdatedinsurancepremiumrefundforthepolicyhisdaughterhadonaleasedvehiclehehadpurchased.InvestigationandAnalysis:Customer’sdaughterhadbeenthelesseeofavehicleandthecustomerdecidedtopurchasethevehiclebybuyingoutthelease.Thecustomercancelledthepreviousinsurancepolicyandhadthevehicletransferredintohisnameatadealership.Unfortunately,thebrokeratthedealershipfailedtoobtainthelicenceplatesduringthepurchaseasanemployeeofthedealershiphadplacedthelicenceplatesinthetrunkofthevehicle.Neitherthecustomer,thebroker,orthelessor/dealershipwereawarethattheinitialpolicyhadnotbeenproperlycancelled.Abouttwomonthsafterthepurchase,thecustomer’sdaughternotedpaymentsfromtheinitial(leasing)policywerestillcontinuing.Thecustomerbroughtthistotheattentionofthedealership,thebrokerandICBC.ICBCdeclinedtoprovideabackdatedpremiumrefundbasedontworeasons:
1. ICBCfeltthatthecancellationerrorwasasaresultofthebroker'sunawarenessoftheproperprocedureandthedealership'scarelessness.
![Page 20: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
2. UntilactivelicenceplatesforapolicyarereturnedtoICBC,thepolicyremainsactiveandICBCisatrisktopayaclaimwhetherornotthelicenceplateisattachedavehicle.UnattachedlicenceplatescarryinsurancecoveragesuchasThirdPartyLiability,AccidentBenefits,andUnderinsuredMotoristProtection.Unattachedlicenceplatescanalsobeusedastemporaryinsurance(upto10days)whenareplacementvehiclehasbeenacquired.
TheFairnessCommissionercarefullyreviewedthecustomer'ssituationanddeterminedthattheresult“wasnotastheresultofanydecision,policy,oractionoftheCorporationbutthroughanoversightinitiallybyanemployeeofthedealershipandsubsequentlybyyourinsurancebroker.”Giventhereluctanceonthepartofthedealershipandinsurancebrokertohelpthecustomer,theFairnessCommissioneraskedICBCtorevisitthematter.Resolution:AtthesuggestionoftheFairnessCommissioner,ICBCreviewedthecustomer’ssituationagainandtheFairnessCommissionerwaspleasedtoreporttothecustomerthat:
Afterextensiveinternalreview,ICBCbroughtthisoversighttotheattentionoftheinsurancebrokeragethatprocessedyourpolicytransactions.Thebrokeragehasacknowledgedthattheirrepresentativedidnotprocessyourpolicycancellationproperly.Asaresult,ICBCisintheprocessofissuingyouwitharefundchequefor$583.00.
Cases2to5(C208036,C212323,C212340andC212341): Issues:FourdifferentcustomerswrotetotheFairnessCommissionerinMarchandApril2012complainingthatICBChadrestrictedtheamountofaClaim‐RatedScale(CRS)refundtotheircurrentinsurancepolicies.ICBCwasnotwillingtobackdatetheirrefundstothetimetheyhadobtainedtheirClass7learner’sdriver’slicences.Inallfourcases,thecustomersarguedtheyhadheldalearner’sdriver’slicence“foracertainnumberofyearsandshouldbeentitledtocreditontheCRSfortheaccidentfreeyearsinvolved,andarefundforanypremiumspaidthatdidnotreflectthoseaccidentfreeyears.” InvestigationandAnalysis:TheFairnessCommissionerreviewedICBC'spracticeinbackdatingCRSentitlementswhenacustomermovesfromalearner’s(“L”)driver’slicencetoanovice(“N”)driver’slicenceoraClass5driver’slicence.TheCommissionerfoundthat:
“theCorporationtakesthepositionthattheformallimitsplaceduponlearnerscreatesanartificialdrivingexperiencewhich,inmanycases,maynotreflectthedriver'sabilitytodrivesafelyonceheorshehadmovedbeyondthe"L"learner'slicence.Forexample,the"L"licencerequiresaqualifieddrivertobepresentinthevehiclewhenthe"L"licenceddriverisoperatingit.ThisiswhytheCorporation
![Page 21: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
drawsadistinctionbetween"L"driversandotherdriversforthepurposeofdeterminingCRSentitlement.Thisappearstometobereasonableandnotunfair.Atitsinception,thepolicyrelatingtobackdatingaCRSdiscountisverysimple,insofarasitappliedto"L"drivers.Therewasnocreditfor"L"yearsofexperiencegrantedto"L"driversindeterminingwheretheyshouldbeplacedontheCRS.Inrecentyearsthispracticehaschangedsothatclaimsfree"L"yearscanresultinanenhancedplaceontheCRSforformer"L"drivers.Thischangewasintroducedasagratuitouscustomerservicebutwasimplementedsubjecttotwoconditions.ThefirstisthatacustomermustinitiatetheapplicationfortheenhancedCRSlevel,andanybackdateofthatlevelisconfinedtoamaximumof395daysandanyrelatedrefundisconfinedtothecurrentpolicyterm.ThesecondconditionisthatanenhancedcreditontheCRSmayattractasubsequentrefundtothecustomer,butonlyforthecurrentyearandgoingforward.Itwillnotbebackdatedtoprioryears.”
Regardingthelattercondition,theFairnessCommissionerstatedthatiswas:“unfairforICBCtoconfinerefunds(asdistinctfromplaceontheCRS)tothoseacustomermaybeentitledtoinacurrentyearandinsubsequentyears.InthepresentcontextthereisnoprovisionintheCorporation'scomputersystemtopickup"L"driversforthepurposeofreassessingtheirCRSlevel.Ithastobedonemanuallywhichisaveryexpensiveproposition.Giventhatsuchareviewisagratuitouscustomerserviceengraftedontheinitialpractice,thattheCorporationbudgetsonanannualbasis,thatanyretroactiveeffectsofitspracticeswouldhavetobebornebythegeneralrunofcustomers,andthatICBChasmadeprovisionforamendmentsoftheCRSandrefundsbasedonthatCRSforthecurrent,andsubsequentyears,Iamnotpersuadedthatthepresentpracticeisunfair.”
Regardingthefirstcondition,theFairnessCommissionerexplainedthat:
“ICBChasdealtwiththematterofcustomernotificationbymakingbrokersthesolepointofdistributionforitsinsuranceproductsanddelegatingtheresponsibilityforprovidingadvicetothecustomer'sbroker.Experiencedbrokersaregenerallyawareoftheruleandcheckonaclient'sentitlementwhentheclientpurchaseshisorherfirstpolicyofinsuranceorarenewal.Myconclusionisthatthenotificationpolicyinvolvingbrokersisreasonableandnotunfairtocustomers.”
Intheend,theFairnessCommissionerdidfindthat:
“giventhatthecontactpointbetweenthecustomerandICBCisthebroker,andnotICBCitself,IhavepersuadedICBCtoincorporateashortstatementofacustomer'sentitlementinitswebpagesandprovidebrokerswithmoreinformationonthesituation.”
![Page 22: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Resolution:ICBCreviewedtheFairnessCommissioner’stwopracticalandpragmaticsuggestionsandupdateditswebsitewithabetterexplanationoftheimportanceofspeakingtoabrokertoobtaintheproperCRScreditforone’slearner’sdriver’slicencehistory.ICBCalsosentoutappropriatecommunicationregardingthisissuetobrokersthroughabrokerbulletinandanonlinebrokernewsletter.
![Page 23: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
AppendixC:CasesresolvedbyICBC’sCustomerRelationsdepartmentThefollowingcasesillustratesomeofthecircumstanceswhereICBC’sCustomerRelationsdepartmentresolvedthecustomer’sconcernwithoutthedirectassistanceoftheFairnessCommissioner.ThesecasesinvolvedcustomerswritingtotheCommissionerwiththeirconcernandtheCommissioneraskingtheCustomerRelationsdepartmenttoinvestigate.In2012,54percentofthecomplaintsdirectedtotheFairnessCommissionerweresuccessfullyresolvedbytheCustomerRelationsdepartmenttothesatisfactionofthecustomer.Inthoseinstances,aCustomerRelationsadvisorwasabletoinvestigatethecustomer’sconcernandeitherexplainedICBC’sdecisionorobtainedanagreementfromamanager,seniorexecutive,orcommitteetoreconsiderortomakeamorefavourabledecisiononbehalfofthecustomer.AlthoughtheFairnessCommissionerwasnotdirectlyinvolvedintheresolutionofthesecases,theassurancethattherecouldbefuturerecoursetohisofficelikelyhadsomeinfluenceonthefinaldecisions.
Case1(C204001):
Issue:CustomerwrotetotheFairnessCommissionerasshewantedabackdatedinsurancepremiumrefundfromICBCtothedateshehadtotaledhervehicle,August28,2011.ICBChadbackdatedthecancellationofherpolicy45daystoOctober16,2011.
Investigation:CustomercrashedhervehicleinCaliforniaandhervehiclewasatotalloss.Unfortunately,shedidnotcarryCollisioncoverage.ICBCbackdatedthecancellationofherICBCpolicy45daysfromthetimeshehadcontactedICBC,asthecustomerhadnotreturnedher
![Page 24: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
BritishColumbialicenceplateswhichcarriesongoinginsurancecoverage,regardlessiftheyareattachedtoavehicle.CustomerRelationsaskedthecustomertoprovideproofhervehiclehadbeenatotallossandthatherlicenceplateswerelostinthecrash.Resolution:Customerlatersuppliedinformationconfirmingvehiclehadbeenatotallossandthatherlicenceplateswerelikelylostinthecrash,soICBCagreedtobackdatethepremiumtothedateofthecrash.Case2(C206568):Issue:ThecustomersentanonlinesubmissiontotheFairnessCommissionerrequestingthatICBCallowhertoregistera1995WesternStartractorandinsurea2006Midlandbellytrailer.ICBChadrefusedtodosobecauseofoutstandingdebtonbothvehicles.Investigation:CustomerRelationsworkedwiththecustomerandconfirmedthatthedebthadbeenapparentlypaidwhenthevehiclesweretransferredintothecustomer’scompanyname.Resolution:CustomerRelationshadtheAccountServicesdepartmentreviewthedocumentationforwardedbythecustomerandthecustomerwasallowedtoregisterandinsurethetruckandtrailer.Case3(C208134):Issue:CustomerwrotetotheFairnessCommissionercomplainingthathehadnotreceivedanAnti‐TheftDevicediscountfromICBCuntilthelasttimeherenewedhisinsurancepolicywheninfacthehadbeeneligibleforthediscountforthepasteightyears.Investigation:CustomerRelationscontactedtheAutoplanbrokerwhohadcompletedthemajorityofthecustomer’srenewals.Thisbrokerhadnotcompletedtheoriginalpolicyeightyearsagosotheydidnotcreatethiserror.Resolution:Brokergavethecustomera$50TimHortonsgiftcardascustomerservicegestureandCustomerRelationshadamessagewritteninabrokernewsletterremindingbrokerstocoverofftheAnti‐TheftDevicediscountwiththeirclients.
![Page 25: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Case4(C212176):Issue:CustomerwrotetotheFairnessCommissionerashewasupsetthatICBChadnotacceptedhisPakistanidriver’slicenceandthatICBCwasunfairlyplacinghimintothegraduatedlicensingprogram(GLP)eventhoughhehadbeendrivingsince1987.
Investigation:CustomerRelationsliasedwithamanagerataDriverLicensingOfficeregardingthecustomer’ssituationandaskedthatthemanagertoreviewthematter.Resolution:TheDriverLicensingOfficemanagerreviewedthecustomer’sPakistanidriver’slicenceandagreedtoacceptit.Managermetwiththecustomer,explainedthisandthathewillnotbeplacedintotheGLP.Case5(C213195):Issue:CustomerwrotetotheFairnessCommissionerusingtheonlineformashewasconcernedabouthowhewasgoingtopayICBCregardingtheoutstandingbalanceofadebtsohecouldhavehisdriver’slicencereinstatedbyICBC.Investigation:Thecustomerhadmadeseveralsignificantpaymentsagainstthedebtinthepast,butwasunabletoworkwithoutadriver’slicence.Thecustomerhadalsosufferedarecenthealthrelatedsetbackthatcouldbeanobstacleinresolvinghisoutstandingaccount.CustomerRelationsbroughtthecustomer’ssituationtotheattentionofanAccountServicesmanager.Resolution:Themanagerreviewedthecustomer’sfileandconcludedthatthecustomer’spasteffortsinrepayinghisoutstandingdebtshouldbeacknowledgedandagreedtoacceptafinal$1000paymenttosettlethematter.
![Page 26: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
AppendixD:SelectcasesFromtheFairnessCommissioner:TogivethereaderofthisreportsomeideaoftheissuesthatIdealwith,Iincludethefollowingsamplecasesfrom2012.Additionalexamplesfrommypreviousannualreportscanalsobefoundat:www.icbc.com.
CaseStudy1:denialofrequesttobackdateapremiumrefund(C206442)IacknowledgereceiptofyourapplicationforaFairnessReview,datedFebruary13,2012,ofthedecisionofICBCtorefundonlypartofthemonthlypremiumpaymentsthatyoucontinuedtomakeafteryourvehiclebecameaconstructivetotalloss.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccountthepointsthatyoumakeinyoursubmissiontothisoffice,aswellasthecontentsofafilepreparedbytheCorporationforthepurposeofthisreviewwhichincludes,amongotherthings,afullchronologyoftheevents,thepertinentregulatoryprovisions,andastatementofICBC'spolicyrelatingtobackdatingrefundsofthissort.Atthisstageitwouldbeusefultooutlinemyjurisdictionandtounderscoresomefeaturesofit.Mytermsofreferencelimitmyreviewtomattersofprocess.IcaninterferewithdecisionsoftheCorporationandmakerecommendationsforchangeifIconcludethatacustomerhasbeendealtwithinadiscriminatorymanner,orthatthewayinwhichthedecisionreachedbytheCorporationisinsomewayirregularleadingtounfairnessintheresult.WhatIcannotdoismakearecommendationforchangetotheCorporationmerelybecauseIwouldhavereachedadifferentconclusion,orthatthecustomerdoesnotagreewithit.1
1 ThisparagraphexplainsthejurisdictionoftheFairnessCommissionerandforthepurposesofthisreporthasbeenremovedfromthesubsequentcasestudies.
![Page 27: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Myjurisdictionisconcernedwithproceduralfairness.Forexample,hastheCorporationtakenthepertinentfactsintoaccount,listenedtotheargumentsmadebythecustomer,andcommunicateditsdecisionandthereasonsforitonceithasbeenmade?Attheendoftheday,istheCorporation'sdecisionreasonableinthecircumstancesofthecase? 2Thefactsinyourcasearequiteclearlysetoutinthelettertoyou,datedFebruary7,2012,fromMs.NatalieAktas,CustomerRelationsAdvisor,soIwillnotrestatethemhere.YourargumentisthatyouwereunawarethatICBChadcontinuedtowithdrawmonthlypremiumpaymentsfromyouraccount,butwhenyoudidbecomeawareofsuchwithdrawalsyoucontactedtheCorporationandwereadvisedtoturninyourlicenceplatestoanAutoplanbroker'soffice.YoudidthisandICBCprocessedthebackdatedpolicyrefundbasedupon45daysfromthedateyouturnedinyourplates.Youarguethattherefundshouldextendbackfromthedatethatyouturnedinyourlicenceplatestothedateofthecollisionrenderingyourcaraconstructivetotalloss.YouarguethatitisunfairforICBCnottodothis.Unfortunately,theproblemthatyouhaveencounteredappearstobeoneofyourownmaking.Whenyoupickedupyoursettlementchequeyoureceivedtwoenvelopes,bothofwhichwouldhavehadadhesivestickersonthemadvisingyoutotaketheplatestoanAutoplanbrokertoeithertransferthemtoanothervehicleortocancelyourinsurance.ItwasnotuntilMay7,2011,thatyouattendedabroker'sofficeandactuallycancelledyourpolicy.Thepremiumrefundwasthencalculatedtoextendbackfor45daysfromthatdate.TheformalrequirementsforcancellinginsuranceoveramotorvehiclearecontainedintheBasicInsuranceTariffwhichhastheeffectofaregulationinthisprovince.ItrequiressurrenderandcancellationofanOwner'sCertificate,surrenderofthenumberplatesandthecompletionofacancellationform.Thereisnoprovisionforbackdatingrefundswhereavehiclehasbeenatotallossandtheinsuredhasjustfailedtocompletecancellationofthepolicy.ButtheCorporationhasdevelopedabackdatingpolicyrelatingtosuchrefunds.Itwasintroducedin2003anditconfinesbackdatingto45daysfromthedateofcancellation.Thereasonforadoptingthe45dayrulewasthat90%oftotallossclaimsweresettledwithin45daysandittookanaverageof45daysforanadjustortoconducttheinvestigationandsettleliability.Thismeansthatmostcasesarecoveredbythe45dayrule.Indecidingwhetherornottheruleisreasonable(fair)twofactorsmustbeborneinmind.ThefirstisthatduringtheperiodwhenthepolicyisnotcancelledbythecustomertheCorporationcontinuestoremainliableforcertainfeaturesofthecustomer'sinsurancecoveredbythatpolicy.So,arangeofcontingentliabilitiescontinuetoremaininforcesofarasICBCisconcerneduntilthepolicyexpiresoriscancelled.Thesecondpointisthatthe
2 ThisparagraphexplainsthejurisdictionoftheFairnessCommissionerandforthepurposesofthisreporthasbeenremovedfromthesubsequentcasestudies.
![Page 28: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
45daylimituponbackdatingrefundsintotallosscasescoversthevastbulkofsuchclaims.InthesecircumstancesIamunabletoconcludethatthe45daylimituponbackdatingrefundsintotallosscasesisunreasonable,andthereforeitisnotunfair.Accordingly,IamunabletofindanyunfairnessonthepartoftheCorporationinapplyingitsstandardpracticerelatingtobackdatingtotallossrefundstoyourcase.IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.Ofcourse,youcouldtakeyourcasetotheofficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown,ortothecourtsofthisprovince.CaseStudy2:assessmentofresponsibility(C209270)IacknowledgereceiptofyouremailrequestforaFairnessReview,datedMay2,2012,onbehalfofyourmother,Mrs.M.,relatingtothefindingofliabilitymadebyICBCconcerningthecollisionthatshewasinvolvedinwithanothervehicleonMarch9,2012.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccountthevariouspiecesofcorrespondencethatyouhavehadwithICBC,thepointsyoumakeinyouremailtothisoffice;aswellasthecontentsofafilepreparedforthepurposeofthisreviewbyICBCthatcontains,amongotherthings,driverandwitnessstatements,photographsofthedamagetothemotorvehiclesconcerned,thefullchronologyofeventsincludingthepolicereport,thepertinentlegislativeandregulatoryprovisionsinvolved,andsomeearlierdecisionsofmyownthatdealwithbroadlysimilarmatters.Thefactsinyourcaseareindispute.Inthisreviewyouareactinguponbehalfofyourmother,Mrs.M.,whowasthedriveroftheSaturnatthetimeofthecollision.OnMarch9,2012,youwereapassenger(withyourson)ina2000Saturnsedandrivenbyyourmother,Mrs.M..Bothyourmother'sandyourversionofeventsarethatwhileproceedingsouthboundonGilmoreAvenueinBurnaby,yourvehiclestoppedforaredlightattheintersectionwithLougheedHighway.Asmallredpickuptruckhadstoppedinfrontofyouanditreversedintoyourvehicleanddroveaway.Youobtainedthelicenceplateandadvisedthepolice.Anofficerattendedandonthosebarefactsissuedaticketagainsttheotherdriver,oncehehadbeenidentified.YounotifiedICBCtwodayslaterofthecollision.OnMarch10,2012,theotherdriverreportedtoICBCthathehadbeenstoppedattheintersectionandthatthevehiclebehindhimstruckhis1994Mazdapickuptruckcausingaminorscratch.Heassertedthatyourvehicleleftthescenewithouthisbeingabletotakethelicenceplate.Theattendingpoliceofficer,whohassinceinterviewedtheotherdriver,hasnowconcludedthatonthefactspresentedtohimheisunabletopositivelyattributefault.Sincetheotherdriverhasissuedanoticetodisputethattrafficticketthematterwillpresumablyberesolvedintheprovincialcourt.
![Page 29: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Inessence,ICBCwasconfrontedwiththefactofthecollisionandstatementsfromyouandyourmotherassertingcertainfacts,andastatementfromtheotherdriverassertingdiametricallydifferentfacts.Thephysicalevidencedidnotresolvethediscrepancybetweenthetwodescriptions,sotheCorporationwasobligedtoapplysuchinferencesasitcoulddrawfromtheestablishedfactsandsuchlawasappliedtothem.ICBCappliesacivilstandardofproofindeterminingwhetherornotparticularfactshavebeendemonstrated.Itdeterminessuchfactstobeprobabilitiesornot,itdoesnotrequirethemtobeestablishedbeyondareasonabledoubt,nordoesitactuponmerespeculation.Theonlyfact,independentfromtheversionsofthepartiesinvolvedinthecollision,isthefactofthecollision.Inthisrespect,sincetheversionspresentedbythepartieswereinconsistentandnotindependent,theCorporationappliedsection161(1)oftheMotorVehicleAct.Thisimposestheobligationofprovingthattheothermotoristwasnegligentuponyou.InthecircumstancesICBChasconcludedthatyouhavejustnotestablishedthenegligenceoftheothermotoristuponthebalanceofprobabilities.Itwasforthisreasonthatyourmother,thedriver,washeldtobe100%atfault.Iamunabletoconcludethatthisdecisionisunreasonable.Accordingly,IamunabletofindthatICBChasdealtwithyouunfairlyinconcludingthatyourmotherwas100%atfault.But,thismatterisessentiallyoneofcredibility.AFairnessReview,whichisadministrativeinnature,isanimperfecttooltodealwiththatissue.Onlyacourtwherethepartiesandwitnessescanbeexaminedandcross‐examinedcouldreallyresolvethecredibilityissue.Theupshotisthat,becauseIcouldfindnounfairnessinthedecisionbyICBC,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.Butthisneednotbetheendofthematterasfarasyouareconcerned.YoucouldtakeyourcasetothecourtsofthisProvinceand,inmyview,thatistheappropriateforumtohavetherealissuesinvolvedproperlydealtwith.YoucouldalsotakethemattertotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown. CaseStudy3:DriverRiskPremiumprogram(C215212)IacknowledgereceiptofrequestdatedOctober24,2012,forareviewofthedecisionofICBCtoplaceyouwithinitsDriverRiskPremium(DRP)programandbillyouaccordingly.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccounttheargumentyoumakeinyourreviewapplication,togetherwithmaterialprovidedtomebytheCorporationrelatingtotheDRPitself.Thefactsinyourcasehavebeensuccinctlysetoutinthelettertoyou,datedOctober31,2012,fromMs.JackieTurner,CustomerRelationsAdvisor.Yourargumentthatyouhave
![Page 30: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
beenunfairlydealtwithbytheCorporationbyimposingtheDRPuponyouisasimpleone.Yousaythatyouhaveonlyreceivedonespeedingticketinthepast15yearsandhavehadnootherdrivinginfractionsduringthatperiod.But,becauseofthatspeedingticketyouhavebeenplacedintheDRPandwillbesubjectedtoadriverriskpremiumof$320forthenextthreeyears.This,youargue,isunfair.TheDRPissetoutinScheduleEoftheBasicInsuranceTariffandwasmandatedbytheB.C.UtilitiesCommissionin2007.OncetheB.C.UtilitiesCommissionauthorizedtheDRP,ithadtheeffectofaRegulationinthisprovince.ThismeansthatIcannotgobehindthesubstanceoftheprogramandcanonlylookatthewayinwhichitisappliedinindividualcases.Effectively,ifyoucoulddemonstrate,forexample,thatICBCwasdiscriminatingagainstyouinsomeway,orthatitignoredanessentialelementofproof,Icoulddealwiththoseissuesonthegroundsofproceduralfairness.But,youmakenosuchargument.Youarguethat,givenyourpreviousdrivingrecord,itisunfairtoplaceyouintheprogramforasingletransgression.Inyourcaseyouwerechargedandconvictedoftheoffenceofexcessivedriving,withexcessivedrivingbeingdefinedas"drivingamotorvehicleonahighwayataspeedgreaterthan40km/hovertheapplicablespeedlimit…."ItisthisfactandthisfactalonethatplacedyouintotheDRP.ICBCdoesnotexerciseadiscretion,itjustappliestheprovisionsoftheDRPineachcase.Inthesecircumstances,IamunabletoconcludethattheCorporationhasdealtwithyouunfairlyinapplyingtheDRPtoyou.Accordingly,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationoftheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.However,youcouldtakethemattertotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown,ortothecourtsofthisprovince.
CaseStudy4:validityofout‐of‐provincedriver’slicence(C212745)IacknowledgereceiptofyouronlineapplicationforaFairnessReview,datedAugust22,2012,ofthedecisionofICBCtorequireyoutoenrollintheGraduatingLicensingProgram(GLP),ratherthanacceptingasevidenceofyourdrivingexperiencethedriver'slicencefromIndiathatyouprovided.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccountthepointsthatyouhavemadeinyoursubmissiontothisoffice,togetherwithafilepreparedforthepurposeofthisreviewbytheCorporationthatsetsoutthefullchronologyofrelevantevents,correspondencefromyoutotheCorporationandfromtheCorporationtoyouorothersactingonyourbehalf,andalettertoyou,datedAugust13,2012,fromMs.ChristineBarrette,CustomerRelationsAdvisor,explainingwhyyourdriver'slicencewasnotsufficienttosatisfytherequirementsoftheCorporation.Thefactsofyourcasearefairlyclear.OnMarch5,2012,yousubmittedyourdriver'slicencefromthecityofRaikot,locatedinthePunjabareaofNorthernIndia,togetherwith
![Page 31: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
anapplicationforanequivalentB.C.driver'slicence.ICBClicensingstaffconcludedthatthelicencedidnotmatchthosepreviouslyreceivedandacceptedfromotherapplicantsthathadbeenissuedbyprovincialauthoritiesinIndia.Thedriver'slicencethatyouprofferedrevealedmisspellingonthelinearstampsandanapparenterrorrelatingtoitsexpirydate.Youhadbeenadvisedofthereasonsfornotacceptingyourdriver'slicenceasevidenceofyourdrivingexperienceinIndia.Anotherproblemwiththedriver'slicencethatyougavetoICBCwasthefactthatitwasnotedasaduplicate.Youwerealsoadvised,throughafemalerelative,thatnofurtherdocumentswouldbeacceptableasevidenceofyourdrivingexperienceinIndia.YouwereadvisedthatICBCwouldcontacttheIndianlicensingauthoritydirectlytoverifytheinformation,butthatuntilareplywasreceivedyouwouldberequiredtoremainintheGLP.OnApril24,2012,ICBCforwardedtheIndianlicensingauthoritiesarequestforfurtherdocumentationrelatingtoyouandyourson,Mr.G..Todate,therehasbeennoresponsetothisrequest.OnthesefactscanitbesaidthatICBChastreatedyouunfairlyinrequiringyoutoenrollintheGLP?WemustbearinmindthattheCorporationmakesitsdecisionsonthebasisoffactsperceivedasprobabilities.Itdoesnotrequirefactstobeestablishedbeyondareasonabledoubt,nordoesitactuponmerepossibilitiesorspeculation.UndertheMotor(Vehicle)Act,ICBCmustbesatisfiedoftheprobableveracityofthefactsstatedinanapplicationforadriver'slicencebeforeissuinganother.Theburdenofestablishingtheveracityofanapplicant'sdrivingexperienceliesupontheapplicant.So,onthefactssofarastheyareknown,canitbesaidICBCwasactingunreasonably(unfairly)innotacceptingthedocumentationyouprovidedinsupportofyourapplicationforadriver'slicence?Inmyopinionitwasnot.Thedocumentationthatyouprovidedinsupportofyourapplicationwasdeficientinanumberofcrucialrespects.UponthebasisofitsexperienceindealingwithIndiandrivers'licences,theCorporationconcludedthatthelicencethatyouprovidedtoitwasprobablyinaccurate.Theburdenofestablishingthelicence'saccuracyrestedwithyou,andtheCorporationconcludedthatyouhadnotsatisfiedthisburden.IamunabletoconcludethatyouhavedemonstratedthatICBCwasdealingwithyouunfairlyinreachingthisconclusion.TheCorporationalsorevieweditsdecisionandupheldit.But,ifIunderstandyourargumentcorrectly,yousaythattherefusaltoacceptfurtherdocumentationinsupportofyourpositionisunfairaswell.ICBC'sresponseisthatiftheoriginalmaterialofferedtoitinsupportofyourapplicationisdeficient,thenfurtherdocumentationpurportingtoremedysuchdeficiencieswouldinallprobabilitynotbecogent.Instead,itwouldmerelyprovideanopportunityforthosewhoprovidedthe"original"withitsdeficienciestoprovideanotherwiththedeficienciesremedied.IamunabletoconcludethatICBC'spracticeinthisregardisunreasonable,thereforeIcannotconcludethatitsapplicationinyourcasewasunfair.YoudonotarguethattherehasbeenanytechnicaladministrativeerroronthepartoftheCorporationinitsdealingswithyou,soIputthatmatteraside.Ofcourse,iftheIndianauthoritiesrespondtoICBC'srequestforinformationinamannerfavourabletoyourcase,themattercanbere‐opened.
![Page 32: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Youcouldalsotakeyourcasetothecourtsofthisprovince,ortotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown.CaseStudy5:refusaltoallowaclaimrepayment(C206366)Iacknowledgeyourelectronicrequest,datedJanuary10,2012,foraFairnessReviewofthedecisionofICBCnottopermityoutorepaythe2009"chargeable"claimattributabletoyou,inordertoenhanceyourpresentpositionontheClaim‐RatedScale(CRS).In reachingmydecision Ihave taken into account the arguments that youhavemade inyour submission to this office, together with the contents of a file prepared by theCorporation for the purpose of this review,which contains among othermaterial, a fullchronology of the relevant events, the pertinent regulatory provisions that apply in thiscase,andanumberofearlierdecisionsofminethatdealwithroughlythesameissuethatyouraise.Iwillnotbelabourthefacts.Theyseemtometobequiteclearlysetoutinthee‐maillettertoyou,datedJanuary31,2012,fromMs,DebbyRaffard,CustomerRelationsAdvisor. IfIunderstandyourfairnessargumentcorrectlyitisthis: afteryour2009accidentICBCdidnot,whendiscussing therepaymentoptionwithyou,pointout that ifyouhave futureatfault accidents your CRSmight be adversely affected. This becamepertinent because in2011youhadanotheratfaultaccidentwhich,togetherwiththe2009accident,didaffectyour CRS quite strongly. The costs of repayment relating to the 2011 accident wereconsiderablymorethanthecostsofrepaymentofthe2009accidentwouldhavebeen.Yousaythathadyourealizedthisin2009,youprobablywouldhaverepaidthe2009accidentcostsandwouldthereforebeinamuchmorefavourablepositionontheCRSifyoudidnotrepaythe2011accidentcosts.Iwouldhave found this argumentmore convincing if Ihadnotnotedon the file thatonthreeoccasionspriorto2009youhadrepaidthecostsassociatedwithchargeableclaimsmadeagainstyourinsurancepoliciesatthetime.IamunabletoconcludethatitwasunfairofICBCnottoadviseyouatthetimeofyour2009claimthatyourCRSmaybeaffectedbyany additional at fault claims. Inmy view, any reasonable customer of the Corporationmustbetakentobeawareofthis.Youalsohaveasubsidiaryargument.YousaythatinyourcaseICBCis"ineffectprofitingfrommebyaconsiderablesum".YousaythatyourincreasedinsuranceratesoverafouryearperiodwillbemuchmorethantheamountthatICBCpaidoutonyourbehalfforthe2009accident.Thismaybetrue,butIamnotsurewhattomakeofitexcepttorelateittoyourotherassertionthat"ICBCisapublicentitywithamandate…nottoplanonprofitingoffthepublic…."Infact,ICBCisapubliccorporationintheinsurancemarketengaginginbusiness in exactly the sameway as any other insurance company does. The only realdifference is that it is created by statute and has a monopoly over basic (compulsory)insurancecoverage.
![Page 33: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Wheredoesthistakeus?YouhavenotbeenabletopointtoanyadministrativeerroronthepartofICBC.Youhavealsobeendealtwithinexactlythesamewayasallcustomersinyoursituationaredealtwith.ThematterofrepaymentofdamagecostsisregulatedbytheBasic Insurance Tariff,which has the force of a regulation in this province. I cannot gobehind theBasic InsuranceTariff. Inearliercases Ihaveconcluded that thepracticesofICBC inapplying thispartof theBasic InsuranceTariff are reasonableand thereforenotunfair to customers. This includes the practice of not allowing claim repayments afterpolicyrenewal.Yourcasehasbeenreviewedandthedecisionthatyoucannotnowrepayyour2009claiminordertoenhanceyourCRSwasupheld. IamafraidthatIcandiscernnounfairnessinthewayinwhichyouhavebeendealtwithbyICBC.Accordingly,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.Of course, there are some options that are also open to you. You could repay the 2011claim. YoucouldalsotakeyourcasetotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown.CaseStudy6:denialofTotalTheftclaim(C206352)IacknowledgereceiptofyourlettertothisofficedatedFebruary1,2012,requestingaFairnessReviewofthedecisionofICBCtoseekrepaymentofmoniesthatithadpaidouttoyouasaresultofanallegedtheftofyourNissan300ZX.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccountthepointsthatyoumakeinyourlettertothisoffice,togetherwiththecontentsofafilepreparedbytheCorporationforthepurposeofthisreviewthatcontains,amongotherthings,therelevantcustomernotes,photographsofthevehiclewhenitwasrecoveredaswellasthesceneoftherecovery,alocksmith'sreportrelatingtotherecoveredvehicle,theCL159formthatyousignedwhenmakingyourinitialclaimcontainingadeclarationthatyouhavenoteverconsideredsellingortradingthevehicleconcerned,aswellasanearlierdecisionofmyowndealingwithacasethatisbroadlysimilartoyourown.ThefactsuponwhichICBCbaseditsdecisiontodemandrepaymentfromyouaresetout,intheletterdatedJanuary13,2012,fromMs.JackieTurner,CustomerRelationsAdvisor.Theactualdemandforrepaymentandthebasisforitiscontainedinthelettertoyou,datedJuly25,2011,fromMs.AnnBukowsky,ClaimsRepresentative,ChilliwackCustomerServices.ThebasisofyourargumentthatitisunfairforICBCtoattempttorecoverthepayoutthatitmadeonthebasisofyourinitialtheftclaim,appearstobethatthevehiclewasindeedstolenandthatwhenyousignedtheCL159formyouweredistractedanddidnotrealizethatyouweredeclaringthatyouhadneverofferedthevehicleforsale.
![Page 34: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
AttheoutsetIshouldreiteratetwoobviouspoints.IcanonlyinterferewiththedecisionsofICBCiftherehasbeenabreachofadministrativeprocessinthewayinwhichthedecisionyoucomplainofwasreached,orifattheendofthedaythefinaldecisionisclearlyunreasonable.YoudonotclaimthatadministrativeprocesswasbreachedbyICBC,soIputthatmatteraside.Instead,Iwillfocusontherealquestion:isICBC'sdecisiontodemandrecoveryoftheamountpaidouttoyouclearlyunreasonable?Thisquestionhastwofeaturesthatmustbeexamined.Thefirstis:haveyouestablishedthatyourvehiclewasstolen?WhenyoulodgedyourclaimforindemnityunderyourStoragePolicyforthetheftofyourvehicle,thefactsaspresentedbyyoudidnotarousesuspicion.ItwasonthebasisofthosefactsthatICBCsettledwithyou.ItwasonlywhenyourvehiclewasdiscoveredandrecoveredbytheAgassizRCMPthatthefactsthatyoupresentedtoICBCbecamesuspect.YourvehiclewasrecoveredfromanareaclosetoaremoteforestryserviceroadnearHarrisonLakeandthetowoperatordescribedtherecoverysiteasbeingwellhiddenasthoughthecarwasnotmeanttobediscovered.InthecarwasaForSalesignwithyourtelephonenumberonit.AmemberofICBC'sSpecialInvestigationUnit(SIU)viewedthevehicleandconcludedthatitsdoorlocksandignitionhadnotbeentamperedwith.AspartoftheSIUinvestigationalocksmithwasretainedtoexaminethevehicleandreportonthequestion,hadtheignitionbeencompromised?Thelocksmithconcludedthata"workingkeyisthemostlikelymethodofthetheft".Thelocksmithdidpointoutthatthecreatingofkeysbycodecanoccurbutitrequiresspecializedtools,knowledgeand/ortheinvolvementofothers.Uponthebasisofthelocksmith'sreport,togetherwiththelocationandthehidingofthevehicleinheavyundergrowth,atthetimeofitsrecovery,ICBCconcludedthattherewasinsufficientevidencetoestablishthatyourvehiclewasprobablystolen.YoushouldappreciatethatICBCbasesitsdecisionsuponfactsfoundasprobabilities.TheCorporationdoesnotbaseitsdecisionsuponfactsestablishedbeyondareasonabledoubt,nordoesitbaseitsdecisionsuponmereconjecture.Underyourcontractofinsurancetheburdenofestablishingasaprobabilitythatyourvehiclewasstolenrestedwithyou.TheCorporation'sviewisthatinthelightofthenewfactsyouhavefailedtodothisonthebalanceofprobabilities.Theotherfactthatalsosupportedthisconclusionwasthediscoverythatyouhadindeedofferedthevehicleforsaleandhadfailedtosellit.Thefailuretoproperlydeclarethefactthatyouhadattemptedtounsuccessfullysellyourvehiclewastheformalreasonfordeclaringyoutobeinbreachofyourpolicyofinsurance.Wheredoesthistakeus?InyourlettertothisofficeyouattempttodiscredittheconclusionreachedbytheCorporationuponthebasisofthelocksmith'sreport.Youarguethatthereareanynumberofwaysinwhichmotorvehiclescanbekeydrivenwherethekeyisnotthekeyoftheowner.Thisisperhapstrue,butthequestionthatICBCisaskingis:isitmoreprobablethannotthatyouhaveestablishedthetheftofthevehicle?Inthelightofthelocationwherethevehiclewasfoundandthelocksmith'sreport,ICBCisoftheview
![Page 35: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
thatyouhavenotdemonstratedthatyourvehiclewasstolenasaprobability.Iamunabletoconcludethatthisdeterminationisunreasonableandthereforecannotconcludethatitisunfairtoyouinthecircumstances.YoursecondlineofargumentgoestothematterofthedeclarationthatyoumadeintheCL159formthatyouhadneverconsideredsellingortradingthevehicle.YounowadmitthatyouhadattemptedtosellthevehicleandsaythatyouhadnotcarefullyreadtheCL159formwhenyousigneditandhadnotnoticedthatparticularquestion.Havingtakenthepositionthatyoudidnotnoticethequestionbecauseyouweredistractedandthatnooneputthequestiontoyoudirectly,youundercutyourargumentatpage2ofyourlettertothisofficebythenclaimingthatyoumisunderstoodthequestionandthatyouranswerwaspremisedbythefactthatsincetheForSalesignhadbeenremovedfromthewindshieldtothebackseat,theword'"was"meaningpresenttenseandnot"was"asinhaseverbeenforsale'wasthewayinwhichyouinterpretedthequestioncontainedinformCL159.Withrespecttoyourargumentthatyouwerenottrulyawareofwhatitwasthatyouweresigningatthetime,IfindmyselfunpersuadedbyyourargumentsandfindthedecisionofICBCtoholdyouinbreachofyourinsurancecontracttobereasonableandthereforenotunfair.Wheredoesthistakeus?MyconclusionisthatyouhavenotbeendealtwithunfairlybyICBCand,inthecircumstances,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.However,youcouldtakethemattertothecourtsofthisprovince,ortotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown.CaseStudy7:Claim‐RatedScaleanddamagestoothermotorist’svehicle(C213304)Iacknowledgereceiptofyouronlinecommunicationstothisoffice,datedSeptember2,2012,andSeptember6,2012,respectively,requestingareviewofthewayinwhichacollisionwithanothervehicle(whilstyoursonwasdrivingyourown),onMay3,2011,wasdealtwithbyICBC.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccountthevariouspointsthatyouhavemadeinyourcommunicationstothisoffice,togetherwithafilepreparedbytheCorporationforthepurposeofthisreviewwhichcontains,amongotherthings,afullchronologyofevents,statementsfromthetwodriversconcerned,colouredphotographsofthedamagesustainedbytheothervehicle,correspondencebetweenyouandtheCorporationrelatingtothematter,theprovisionsintheBasicInsuranceTariffrelatingtotheClaim‐RatedScaleandsomeearlierdecisionsofmyownwhichbear(somewhatobliquely)ontheClaim‐RatedScaleissues.ThefactsofthiscasearedisputedbutIadoptforthepurposeofthisreviewthosethatwerefoundbytheassessorintheClaimsAssessmentReviewofJuly7,2011.Youcontinueto
![Page 36: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
objecttothefindingofliabilityat100%againstyourson,butacknowledgethatIhavenojurisdictiontointerferewiththisfinding.Imerelynoteinpassingthattheassessor'sfindinginthisregardwasthesameasthatofICBCafterafullreviewofthematter.Theamountofthesettledclaimconcernsyoubecausetheinitialestimatewasconsiderablylessthanthefinalcostof$1,122.05.But,astheCorporationhasexplainedtoyou,itisnotuncommonforinitialestimatestobealteredasactualdamagewhichmayhaveinitiallybeenconcealedbecomesapparent.Becausetheshopownerwhereyoutookyourcarforrepair,onthebasisofphotographs,consideredthattheothervehiclehadpreviouslybeeninvolvedinasimilaraccidentinvolvingdamagetothesamepartofit,yourequestedinformationfromICBCrelatingtothe(alleged)prioraccident.Thedamagetotheotherparty'svehiclewasexaminedbyanICBCestimatorwhoconcludedthatitwascausedinallprobabilityasaresultofimpactwithyourvehicle.ItisnotthepracticeofICBCtoprovidecustomerswithinformationrelatingtoearlierdamagethatamotorvehiclemayhavesustainedInstead,acourtorderwouldbenecessarytoobtainthisinthecourseoflitigation.IdonotfindICBC'spracticetobeunreasonableandthereforedonotfindthatitisunfair.YournextargumentthatyouhavebeendealtwithunfairlyisuponthebasisthatthewayinwhichtheClaim‐RatedScale(CRS)wouldapplytoyoursoninthefutureamountedto"double‐dipping".Iconfess,thatIhavegreatdifficultyinfollowingyourargumentinthisrespect.InotefromthefilethatMs.ChristineBarrette,CustomerRelationsAdvisor,explainedtoyouhowtheCRSfunctionsinanemaildatedAugust22,2012.TheClaim‐RatedScale,andthewayinwhichpremiumsarecalculated,issetoutinScheduleD,oftheBasicInsuranceTariff.TheBasicInsuranceTariffhastheeffectofaRegulationinthisprovince,andIcannotgobehinditsprovisions.Onlyifacustomercan,forexample,demonstratethatsheorhehasbeendiscriminatedagainstastheresultofthewayinwhichtheCRSisappliedtohimorherdoIhavethejurisdictiontointervene.Inyourcaseyoumakenosuchargument,youmerelyassertthattheeffectsofapplyingtheCRStoyourson'scircumstancesareclearlyunfair.Iamafraidthat,whatevermyviewsinthisregard,IhavenojurisdictiontogobehindtheCRS.YoualsocomplainthatyouwerenotgivennoticeinatimelyfashionofthepayouttotheotherdriverwhichmayhaveprecludedyourabilitytorepaythatamountinordertoavoidtheCRSconsequencesofnon‐payment.IagreethatthiswasafailureonthepartoftheCorporationandthatitwouldhavebeenunfairinyourcaseifyouhadbeenprecludedfrompayingoffthethirdparty'sclaimintimetoavoidtheimpactonyourCRS.Fortunately,youweregiventheinformationjustbeforetheneedtorenewyourinsurancearose.Youdidrenewyourinsuranceafterpayingoffyourthirdpartyclaimthusavoidingthesevereadverseeffectsthatmightotherwisehaveaccrued.Whatistheupshotinyourcase?YourrealdisagreementwiththeCorporationisonthequestionofliability,andIamnotabletointerveneinthatregard.Ihavereadthefilecarefullyand,sofarasyourotherissuesareconcerned,IamunabletoconcludethatyouhavebeendealtwithunfairlybytheCorporation.Sofarasyourconcernabouttheresultsoftheaccidentfollowingyoursonfor20yearsforinsurancepurposes,Iamadvisedby
![Page 37: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
ICBCthatthisismerelyanotationonhisfilewhichhasnosubstantiveimpactuponhim.Intheresult,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.Ofcourse,youcouldtakethemattertothecourtsofthisprovince,oreventotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown.CaseStudy8:principaloperatorbreach(C209331)Iacknowledgereceiptofyouronlineapplication,datedMay6,2012,foraFairnessReviewof the decision of ICBC to hold you in breach of the policy of insurance over your 1995MercuryVillagervan,byincorrectlydeclaringyourselftobethePrincipalOperatoratthetimeyoutookoutthatinsurancepolicy.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccountthepointsyoumakeinyourapplicationforaFairnessReview,aswellasthecontentsofafilepreparedbytheCorporationforthepurposeofthisreviewwhichcontains,amongotherthings,afullchronologyoftherelevantevents, the statements of yourself and your wife, Mrs. P., the decision of the ClaimsCoverageCommitteewhichreviewedthedecisiontodenyyoucoverage,andtherelevantregulatoryprovisionsthatapplytoyourcase.Thefactsofyourcasearefairlyclear.OnMay2,2011,Mrs.P.whilstdrivingyourMercuryVillagervanwasinvolvedinacollisionwithanothervehicleandfoundbyICBCtobe100%atfault.OnMay11,2011,youmetwithanICBCadjustorandgaveastatement.AsaresultofyourstatementyouwereadvisedthatanissuehadarisenaboutwhowasthePrincipalOperator of the Mercury Villager van. Whereas you had declared yourself to be thePrincipalOperatorwhenyoupurchasedyour insurancepolicy,yourstatement led to theconclusionthatMrs.P.wasprobablythePrincipalOperator.You were sent a warning letter dated May 11, 2011, advising you that you will beinvestigated for a possible breach of your insurance relating to the declaration that youmadethatyouwere tobe thePrincipalOperatorofyourvehicle. Thiswassubsequentlyfollowedupbya letterdatedJune21,2011,advisingyouthattheCorporationhadfoundyoutobeprobablyinbreachofyourinsurancepolicyforthereasonjuststated.BeforethatletterwassenttoyouthematterhadbeenreviewedbyaManagerandlaterwasreviewedby the Surrey Claim Office Manager. It was again reviewed by the Claims CoverageCommitteeandthedecisiontoholdyouinbreachofyourpolicyofinsurancewasaffirmed.WhatisthebasisofyourargumentthatyouhavebeenunfairlytreatedbyICBC? Youdonotclaimtohavesufferedanyadministrativefailureonthepartof theCorporation,so itcanonlybebasedupontheargumentthatICBChasdealtwithyourcaseunreasonablyandthereforeunfairly.Dothefactsbearthisout?Inmyviewtheydonot.Yousaythatwhenyoutookoutthepolicyofinsuranceyouwerenotreallyawareofwhatitwasthatyouweresigning. Thisrunscountertothefactthatyousignedtheapplicationandyouspecifically
![Page 38: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
initialed thatpartof it that refers to thePrincipalOperatorof thevehicle. Aswell, ICBCcontactedyourinsurancebrokerandthebrokeradvisedthatithadnotestoindicatethatthePrincipalOperatordesignationwasconfirmedwithyou.YoursecondargumentisthatMrs.P.wasnotthePrincipalOperatorofthevehicle,butyouwere. Thisgoes to thedefinitionof "PrincipalOperator"contained insection1(1)of theInsurance(Vehicle)Regulation. Itisstatedtheretomean"thepersonwhowilloperatethevehicledescribedinanapplicationforacertificateforthemajorityofthetimethevehicleisoperatedduring the termof thecertificate…." Indetermining this issue, theCorporationwasconfrontedwiththreestatements–twofromyouandonefromMrs.P..Yourfirststatement,datedMay11,2011,statesinpart,"Ihaveawhite1995VillagervanthatMrs. P. uses to go to the pizza place and to do shopping and stuff. I drive the vansometimestogetgroceriesontheweekend.But,thisisthevehiclethatMrs.P.drivesmostly…."ThereferencetothepizzaplacewastoafamilypizzabusinesswhereMrs.P.worked(apparently, not on a full time basis). You gave a second statement on June 8, 2011,subsequenttohavingbeennotifiedthatICBCwasinvestigatingwhatitfeltwasapossiblebreachofyourpolicyofinsurance.Inthisstatementyousaidinpart,"Mrs.P.usesthevanaboutonceaweektogotothepizzashoptohelpout.Shewouldgetcalledinaboutonceortwiceaweek.IdrivethevanmorethanMrs.P..AfterworkIdon'tdrivetheTacoma(anothervehiclethatyouown)soIwouldusethevanortheYaris(stillanothervehiclethatyouown)andIwoulddrivethevanonweekendstotakethefamilyoutanddothegroceryshopping…."Inherstatement, takenonJune8,2011,Mrs.P.said,"Idrivethevanonceaweekmaybe.Sometimes Iwillwalk toworkabout10minuteswalking.…When Idrive the van it is forerrandsonceaweekorsomethingbutnottowork.…Idrivethevanaboutonceaweek.Myhusbanddrives the vanonlyafterwork forhispersonal errands…." Because of languagedifficultiesthisstatementwasatranslation,andyouwereintheroomatthetime.Your second statement, which closely resembles that of Mrs. P., clearly conflicts in amaterialrespectwithwhatyousaidinyourfirststatement.InyourcasethereisnoissuewithunderstandingtheEnglishlanguage,sothatmattercanbeputaside.Wherethendoesallthistakeus?ICBCbasesitsdecisionsuponwhatitperceivestobetheprobablefactsofthecase. Isitunreasonableinthesecircumstancestoconcludethatyouwereprobablyinbreachofyourpolicyofinsurancewhenyoumadethedeclarationatthetime of taking it out that youwould be the Principal Operator of the vehicle? I cannotconcludethatitis.Thefactsinthefilerevealthatyouprobablyunderstoodtheobligationsinvolved indeclaringyourself tobe theprincipal operatorof thevehicle at the timeyoutookoutyourpolicyofinsurance,andthatMrs.P.(ratherthanyourself)wasintendedtobethePrincipalOperatorasdefined in section1of the Insurance (Vehicle)Regulation. Onecannotalsobeunmindfulof the fact thatby falselydeclaringyourself tobe thePrincipalOperatorofyourvehicle,youincurredapremiumsavingintheamountof$668.Inthesecircumstances, I amnotpersuaded thatyouhavedemonstrated that ICBChasdealtwithyouunfairlyinconcludingthatyourmisrepresentationbreachedyourpolicyofinsurance.
![Page 39: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Accordingly,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.But,thisneednotbetheendofthematter.Youcouldtakeyourcasetothecourtsofthisprovince, or to the Office of the Provincial Ombudsperson, which has a much widerjurisdictionthanmyown.CaseStudy9:EscalatingDeductibleProgram(C212935)IacknowledgereceiptofyouronlinerequestforaFairnessReview,datedAugust20,2012,ofICBC'sdecisiontoofferyouoptionalOwnDamageCollisionandComprehensivecoveragewithaminimum$2500deductiblerelatingtoCollisionandComprehensivecoverage.ThisresultedfromICBCplacingyourpolicyintheEscalatedDeductibleProgram(EDP).InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccountthepointsthatyouhavemadeinyourreviewrequest,aswellasthecontentsofafilepreparedforthepurposeofthisreviewbyICBC,whichincludesthefullchronologyofevents,informationrelatingtotheEDPandthewayinwhichitappliestocustomers,aswellasearlierdecisionsofmyownrelatingtotheEDP.
Thefacts,atleastasICBCunderstandsthem,aresetoutintheletterdatedJuly12,2012,toyoufromMs.DebbyRaffard,CustomerRelationsAdvisor.InsupportofyourclaimthatyouhavebeenunfairlydealtwithbyICBCyoumakeanumberofadditionalsubmissions.Youpointoutthatgiventheareathatyoulivein,therisksofcollisionwithwildlifeareconstantandthatnoneofthecollisionsthatformthebasisofplacingyouintotheEDPwereyourfault.But,theEDPisnotrelatedtothecustomer'sdrivingrecordbaseduponfault,butismerelyaresponsetothecustomer'sperceivedelevatedriskofclaimsbaseduponhisorherclaimhistory.Itisamechanismdesignedtoensurethatthosewhodriveincircumstancesofhigherriskbearacostthatreflectsthisratherthanimposingthatcostuponallothercustomerswhodonotdriveinthosecircumstances.ItshouldbeborneinmindthattheEDPonlyappliestocomprehensivecoveragewhichisoptional.NocustomerofICBCisrequiredtopurchasecomprehensivecoveragefromtheCorporation.Instead,thecustomercangototheopeninsurancemarketandpurchasesuchcoverageifitispreferred.Youalsocomplainthatyouweregivenno"priorwarning"oftheEDPapplyingtoyouuponrenewalofyourinsurancewiththeCorporation.Inotethattherenewalreminderthatwassenttoyoucontainedaspecificwarninginthethirdlastparagraphofthesecondpage,andthatyoureceivedaspecificletteradvisingyouthatyouwillbecoveredbytheEDPifyourenewyourcomprehensiveinsurancewiththeCorporation,byletterdatedJune12,2012.Aswell,onAugust10,2011,thedateofyourpolicyrenewal,theAutoplanbrokerreceivedanelectronicerrorcodeprompttoadviseyouofthepossibilitythatyourpolicymaybeplacedintheEDPifanothercomprehensiveclaimwasprocessed.Iamnotpersuadedthat
![Page 40: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
youhaveestablishedthatICBChasunreasonablyfailedtoadviseyouofyourriskofplacementintheEDP.YoualsoarguethatICBChasdealtwithyouunreasonablybynotprovidingyouwithsomesortofformularevealingexactlywhyyourcomprehensiveclaimsdeductiblehasbeensetat$2500ratherthansomelesseramount.TheRiskUnderwritingDepartmentoftheCorporationbasesthedecisiontochangesomeone'sdeductibleontheirpolicyonanindividualassessmentoftheclaimshistoryunderthatpolicy.Theactualdeductibleofferedwilldependontheindividualcircumstances,includingthenumberandtypeofclaimsandtheamountpaidforeachclaim.Thereisnoformulainthesenseofatable,andIamunabletoconcludethatthe$2500deductibleofferedtoyouisunreasonable,particularlyinthelightoftherangeofpaymentsthatICBChasmadeinthefourcomprehensiveclaimsyoumadebetweenJanuary26,2010,andNovember4,2011.YoualsofeelthereissomesignificanceinthefactthatyouarelocatedinWestKootenayandsomecorrespondencereferredtoEastKootenay.TheKootenayreferenceisreallyirrelevant,itistheTerritorywhichissignificant.BothKootenaysareinTerritoryNandtheaverageclaimofcustomersinTerritoryNisoneclaimeverynineyears.Thisshouldbecontrastedtoyourfourclaimsoveratwoyearperiod.Intheresult,Iamunabletoconcludethatofferingyoua$2500deductibleforfuturecomprehensiveclaimsisunfair.Accordingly,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.
Iwoulddrawyourattention,however,tothefactthatyoucouldgototheprivateinsurancemarketandattempttogetabetterrateforyourOwnDamageComprehensiveinsurance.Youcouldalsotakeyourcasetothecourtsofthisprovince,ortheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasawiderjurisdictionthanmyown.CaseStudy10:paymentofdeductible(C205929)IacknowledgereceiptofyourrequestforaFairnessReviewofthewayinwhichICBCdealtwiththedeductiblecosttoyouassociatedwiththedamagesustainedbyyour2000DodgeNeononFebruary4,2011,ontheCoquihallaHighway.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccounttheextensivesubmissionthatyouhavemadetotheofficeoftheB.C.Ombudsperson,aswellascorrespondencethatyouhavehadwiththeMinistryofTransportationandInfrastructure,andV.Ltd.IhavealsotakenintoaccountthecontentsofafilepreparedbytheCorporationforthepurposeofthisreviewthatsetsoutthefullchronologyofevents.Iwillnotgooverthefactsofyourcaseinanydetail.Theycanbeshortlysummarizedinthefollowingway:whilstdrivingnorthontheCoquihallaHighwayyoustruckalargepotholewhichcauseddamagetotwotiresandrimsonyourmotorvehicle.The
![Page 41: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
replacementcostrelatingtothedamagewas$451.04andyourpolicyofinsurancecarrieda$300deductible.Accordingly,youwerereimbursedintheamountof$151.04onMarch8,2011.Youattemptedtoobtainreimbursementforthecosttoyouofthe$300deductiblecarriedbyyourpolicyofinsurancefromboththeprovincialMinistryofTransportationandInfrastructure,andthecompanyresponsibleformaintainingthatpartoftheCoquihallaHighway,V.Ltd.Yourattemptswereunsuccessful.YouhavesinceturnedtoICBCandattemptedtopersuadeICBCthatitwasunderanobligationtopursuereimbursementtoyouofthe$300deductiblefromeitherorbothofthetwopartiesreferredtoabove.Infact,ICBCexerciseditsgoodofficesandattemptedtoobtainthecostofthedeductiblesinvolvedinallthecasesofcustomerswhosevehicleshadbeendamagedasaresultoftheirvehiclesrunningintothepothole.But,theseattemptswerefruitless.IfIunderstandyourfairnessargumentcorrectly,itisthatICBCshouldbeyouragentinattemptstorecoverthedeductiblecostsandisobligedtopursuerecoveryonyourbehalf,notmerelybyextending"goodoffices"butbytakinglegalactionagainstthehighwaycontractorand/ortheprovincialhighwayauthority.IconfessthatIamsomewhattakenabackbyyourlineofargument.Myunderstandingofthelegalpositionisthatunderyourcontractofinsuranceyouareableonlytorecoverdamagecoveredbythepolicylesstheamountofwhateverdeductibleyouhavecontractedfor.InanylegalactionbaseduponsubrogationbyICBCagainsttheB.C.highwaysauthorityorthemaintenancecompany,ICBCwouldonlyrecoverwhateveritwaslegallyobligedtopayouttotheinsuredcustomeranddidinfactpayout.Ifthecustomerwantedtorecoverforthedeductiblecosts,thecustomerwouldbeobligedtobringaseparateactionagainstthedefendantsfortheamountofthedeductible.Ifmyanalysisofthesituationiscorrect,IamunabletoseehowitcanbesaidthatICBChasdealtwithyouunfairlybyfailingtobringanactiontorecoverasumofmoneyforyou,whichithasnolegalrighttodo.So,withrespecttoyour$300deductibleIamunabletofindanyunfairnessonthepartoftheCorporationinthewayinwhichithasdealtwiththematter.Itappearstomethatyouseemtobemakingamoregeneralargumentaswell.YouseemtobesayingthatitisunfairforICBCnottobringsuitagainstthehighwayauthorityandthehighwaymaintenancecompanytorecoverthenon‐deductiblecoststhathavebeenincurredasaresultofitsvariouscustomerssustainingdamageasaresultofthepothole.InthisregardyouhavehadthematterexplainedtoyoubyICBCinsomedetail.WhetherornottheCorporationelectstopursueasubrogatedactionis,inmyview,outsidemyjurisdiction.ThefactorsthattheCorporationhastotakeintoaccountindeterminingthecosteffectivenessofsuchanactionaremanyandvarious–nottheleastofwhichisthelikelihoodorunlikelihoodofsuccess.Inthepresentcircumstances,giventhatcustomershavealreadybeenreimbursedfortheiractualdamagelesstheirdeductible,andthattheCorporationcouldnotpursueinasubrogatedactionrecoveryofthatdeductible,IamunabletoseeanyroomfortheargumentthatIhavejurisdictionoverthematteratall.
![Page 42: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
AttheendofthedayIamunabletoconcludethatyouhavebeendealtwithunfairlybyICBC.Accordingly,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffecttheoutcomeofyourcase.Ofcourse,youarefreetotakethematteruponcemorewiththeOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown,oreventheSmallClaimsCourtofthisprovince.Beforetakingthislattercourse,however,Iurgeyoutoseektheadviceofalawyer.
![Page 43: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
AppendixE:ExamplesofNon‐JurisdictionalCases
InadditiontothoseissuesthattheFairnessCommissionerhasreviewed,therearematterswhichtheCommissionerhasruledtobeoutsideofhisjurisdictionasperhisTermsofReference(AppendixG).AfewexamplesofletterswrittentocustomersbytheFairnessCommissionerhavebeenprovidedtoillustratewhatothermattershavebeendirectedtotheFairnessCommissionerwhicharebeyondhisjurisdiction.
Case1:litigatedmatter(C209443)“IacknowledgereceiptofyourapplicationforaFairnessReviewofthedecisionofICBCtofindyouinbreachofyourpolicyofinsurancerelatingtoacollisiononNovember10,2010,thatyourmotorvehiclewasinvolvedin.Unfortunately,mytermsofreferenceexcludemyjurisdictionifamatterhasbeenreferredtoacourt.IhavebeenadvisedbyICBCthatyourlawyerissuedawritonMay3,2012,relatingtothismatter.Accordingly,Idonothavejurisdictiontodealwithyourcase.” Case2:decisionsmadebythecourtsregardingcourtorderedcosts(C213733)“IacknowledgereceiptofyourletterofSeptember3,2012,requestingaFairnessReviewofthedecisionofICBCtoenforcetheawardofcostsmadeagainstyoubytheB.C.SupremeCourt,relatingtothedecisionofthatCourtholdingyouresponsibleforthesinglevehicleaccidentthatoccurredonMarch4,2000.Myjurisdictionprecludesmefromdealingwithanymatterrelatingtoacourtdecision,soIamafraidthatIcannotaddressthesubstantiveissuethatconcernsyou.Iwill,however,forthesakeofclaritycommentontwomattersthatyouhaveraised.Youseemtoarguethatthereissomesortofestoppelbecausethechequebywhichyoupaidthesubstantiveawardmadeagainstyoucontainedonitsfacethestatementthatitwasincompletesettlementofcourtcosts.Althoughitisaquestionoflawratherthanoneoffairness,Iamunawareofanydoctrinethatwouldenableonepartytoimposeanestoppeluponanotherbymerelywritingonachequemadeouttosatisfyasubstantivecourtjudgmentthatitalsosatisfiesthecosts.YoualsocomplainatthetimeittookICBCtofigureoutitscostsandtobillyouforthem.InthisregardIwouldmerelypointoutthatpursuanttotheLimitationsActofthisprovinceICBChas10yearsinwhichtopresentandenforceitsaccounttoyouinthisrespect.IfearthatIamunabletodealwithyourapplicationonaccountofmylackofjurisdiction.”
![Page 44: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Case3:liabilitydecision(C205498)“IacknowledgereceiptofyourelectronicapplicationforaFairnessReviewofthedecisionofICBCtofindyoutobe100%atfaultforthemotorvehiclecollisionthatyouwereinvolvedinonJune28,2011.Youweredrivingyoursister'sHondaCivicand,whilstmakingaU‐turn,wereinvolvedinacollisionwithanotherHondaCivic.InreachingmydecisionIhavetakenintoaccounttheveryextensivelegalanalysisandsupportingmaterialthatyouhaveprovidedinordertorebuttheCorporation'sconclusionthatyouare100%atfaultforthecollision,aswellasthedecisionoftheClaimsAssessmentReview,datedOctober31,2011,thatupheldtheCorporation'sfindingastoyourliability.Attheendoftheday,however,IhavetoconcludethatIhavenojurisdictiontodealwithyourcase.Mytermsofreference,whichareappendedtotheAnnualReportsoftheICBCFairnessCommissioner,statequiteclearlythatmyjurisdictiondoesnotincludecomplaintsordisputesthatrelatesolelyorprimarilyto…theassessmentofliability.Yet,itistheliabilityassessmentthatyouwantmetoreview.Aswell,thebasisforsuchareviewliesonyourinterpretationofwhatyousayisthelawthatshouldhaveappliedinyourcase.Iamafraidthatthisisclearlyoutsidemypurview,asaFairnessCommissioner.Thesortofargumentthatyouareraisingcanonlybeproperlymadeinacourtoflaw.Theresultis,Ifear,thatImustdeclinejurisdictioninthisinstance.Accordingly,IdonotproposetomakearecommendationtotheBoardoftheCorporationthatwouldaffectthepresentoutcomeofyourcase.Therearesomeoptions,however,thatareopentoyou.YoucouldtakeyourcasetotheOfficeoftheProvincialOmbudsperson,whichhasamuchwiderjurisdictionthanmyown,oryoucouldtakeyourcasetothecourtsofthisprovince.”Case4:reviewofstreetracingconviction(C208983)“IacknowledgereceiptofyourletterofApril24,2012,requestingareviewofICBC'sdecisiontonotopenupthematterofyour"streetracing"convictionrelatingtoeventsthattookplacein2003.IamafraidthatIamunabletoassistyouinthisrespectbecausemyjurisdictionisconfinedtoexaminingthedecisionsandpracticesofICBC.ICBCismerelythegatekeeperwhenitcomestoissuesrelatingtomotorvehicleinfractions.Ithasthestatutoryresponsibilityofmaintainingrecords,butithasnojurisdictiontointerferewiththesubstantivecontentreflectedinsuchrecords.Onlythecourtsofthisprovincecanoverturnyourconviction.Inthisregard,Idourgeyoutoseeklegaladvicebeforeproceedingfurther.
![Page 45: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
TheupshotisthatImustdeclinejurisdictiontoengageinanoverviewofyourcase.”Case5:reviewofdrivingsuspension(C215082) “I acknowledge receipt of your application, dated October 27, 2012, for a review of the decision of the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to require you to remain in the Graduated Licensing Program for a further two years, as a result of your one month driving suspension for failing to display an N sign on your vehicle whilst driving it. Unfortunately, I do not have jurisdiction to review this matter. When you had your case reviewed by the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, and the time of your suspension was reduced from four months to one month, the ICBC employee acted in the capacity of reviewer as being so on behalf of the Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and not ICBC. I am confined to fairness reviews that relate to ICBC decisions, etc. In these circumstances I am afraid that I must decline jurisdiction.”
![Page 46: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
AppendixF:Statisticsfrom2010–2012Thefollowingnumbersarebasedonfilesclosedfrom2010to2012(JantoDec):(Percentagesmaynotsumto100%duetorounding) 2010 2011 2012ClaimsServices 105 52% 92 60% 89 40%Autoplan 30 15% 19 13% 51 23%AccountServices(formerlyCollections) 29 14% 22 14% 36 16%
DriverLicensing 18 9% 13 8% 27 12%ServiceQuality 13 6% 2 1% 8 4%VehicleRegistration 3 2% 3 1%RoadSafety 1 1% 1 1% 3 1%Privacy&FreedomofInformation
3 1% 2 1% 1 1%
VehicleLicensing 1 1%CommercialVehicleServices 1 1% NotICBC 3 1% 2 1%Total 203 154 221 100%
ClaimsServices–FairnessCommissionerrelatedConcernsbySub‐Categories
2010 2011 2012Coveragedenied 35 34% 31 34% 28 32%Liabilitydisputes 22 21% 23 25% 17 19%Repairs 12 11% 10 11% 14 16%Claimhandlingprocess 8 8% 9 10% 7 8%Injurymanagement 1 1% 2 2% 6 7%Settlement 6 6% 8 9% 4 5%Totaltheft 6 6% 3 3% 4 4%Hitandrun~uninsured 4 4% 2 2% 4 4%TotalLoss 5 5% 2 2% 3 3%Rentalvehicle 1 1% 1 1% 1 1%Externalserviceproviders 2 1% 1 2% 1 1%Inforequest 1 1%Comprehensive(otherthantheft) 2 1% Total 105 92 89
![Page 47: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Autoplan‐FairnessCommissionerrelatedConcernsbySub‐Categories 2010 2011 2012Claim‐RatedScale(CRS) 14 47% 6 32% 17 33%Policycancellationsrefunds 2 7% 5 26% 11 22%Costofinsurance 1 3% 6 12%Policydetails 7 23% 4 21% 5 10%Insurancecoverages 1 5% 5 10%Premiumdiscounts 1 3% 1 5% 2 4%Autoplan12&6 2 4%ICBCPaymentPlanfinancing 1 5% 1 2%MultipleCrashPremium(MCP) 1 2%Miscellaneoustransactions 3 10% 1 2%Brokerservices 2 7% Vehicleregistrationfraud 1 5% Total 14 19 51
DriverLicensing–FairnessCommissionerRelatedConcernsbySub‐Categories 2010 2011 2012Exams(writtenorroadtest) 2 11% 3 23% 7 26%Driver’slicenceIDrequirements 7 39% 4 31% 5 18%RefusetoissueBCDL 6 33% 2 15% 5 18%GraduatedLicensingProgram 3 17% 1 8% 4 15%Driver’slicenceissuance 3 11%Vehicleanddriverrecords 1 7% 1 4%Driver’slicencestatus 1 4%Movingin/outofprovince 1 4%Vehicleimpoundment 2 15% Total 18 13 27 AccountServices–FairnessCommissionerRelatedConcernsbySub‐Categories 2010 2011 2012Claimrecoverydebt 13 45% 6 27% 11 31%Insurancepremiumdebt 5 17% 5 23% 8 22%DRP(DriverRiskPremium)debt 5 17% 3 14% 6 17%DPP(DriverPointPremium)debt 2 7% 2 9% 6 17%Finesdebt 4 14% 5 23% 4 11%MCP(MultipleCrashPremium)debt 1 3%Governmentdebt 1 5% DriverLicensing 29 22 36
![Page 48: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
AppendixG:TermsofReferencefortheICBCFairnessCommissioner STATEMENTOFPURPOSE1. ICBCisapubliclyownedandcustomerdrivenorganization.Assuch,itrecognizesthe
valueofhavingaprocesstoindependentlyreviewthefairnessofitsactions.Toachievethisgoal,theFairnessCommissionerwillreviewandmakerecommendationswithrespecttounresolvedcustomercomplaintsthatrelatetothefairnessoftheprocessleadingtoadecisionoraction,butwithoutduplicatingexistinginternalorexternaldisputeresolutionprocesses.Animportantcomponentofafairnessreviewisthatitbecompletedinatimelymanner.Accordingly,theFairnessCommissioner’sreviewshouldbethoroughbutstraightforwardenoughthatrecommendationsmaybemadewithoutunduedelay.
SCOPE2. An"unresolvedcustomercomplaint"is:
a. acomplaintaboutthefairnessofanICBCdecision,actionorpracticeasithasbeenappliedtoacustomer;
b. madeinwriting(withtheassistanceofICBCstaffifnecessary)byanICBCcustomer,where"customer"includesthosewhoaredirectlyaffectedbyanICBCdecision,actorfailuretoactinanyofitslinesofbusiness,andinwhichthecustomeragreestothetermssetoutinsection9b)oftheseTermsofReference;and
c. notresolvedtothecustomer’ssatisfactionafterareasonableeffortbythecustomertoaddresstheircomplaintthroughICBC’sinternalcomplaintresolutionprocessesincludingICBC’sCustomerRelationsdepartmentbutdoesnotinclude:
i. complaintsbysuppliers,brokersoremployeesofICBCthatarisefromtheircontractoremploymentwithICBC;
ii. complaintsordisputesthatrelatesolelyorprimarilytotheamountofafinalpayment,claimsettlementorassessmentofliability;
iii. complaintsconcerningthedispositionofaviolationticketissuedbyapeaceofficeremployedbyICBC,ortheconductofapeaceofficeremployedbyICBC;
iv. complaintsthatrelatetodecisionsmadebyorareatthediscretionoftheBoard;
v. amatterthatisreferredtoacourt,astatutorytribunalortoarbitration;acourtdecision,adecisionofastatutorytribunalortheresultofanarbitration;
vi. complaintsconcerningtheadviceorconductoflawyers;andvii. mattersthatfallwithintheprincipaljurisdictionofstatutorydecision
makerssuchastheHumanRightsTribunal.
![Page 49: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
CONDUCTOFREVIEW3. Uponreceivinganunresolvedcustomercomplaintforreview,theCommissionermay
doanyofthefollowing:a. ReferthemattertotheappropriatedepartmentofICBCwithorwithout
recommendations;b. RecommendthatICBC’sManager,CustomerRelationsconductaninvestigation;c. Facilitatearesolutionofthecomplaintswiththecomplainantandthe
appropriateICBCpersonnel;d. Recommendthatthecomplaintproceedtomediationorarbitration;e. SeektheassistanceoftheExecutiveorBoardofDirectorsofICBC;f. Conductaninvestigationofthecomplaint;g. Grouptogethercomplaintsofasimilarnatureandconductasinglereviewofthe
issueorissuesraisedbysuchcomplaints;andh. WiththeconsentofICBCandthecomplainant,actasmediatorwithrespectto
thecomplaint,inwhichcasetheCommissionermaynolongercontinuetoconductaninvestigationorreviewormakeanyfindingsorrecommendationswithrespecttothecomplaint.
4. IftheCommissionerrequiresanydocumentsorinformationfromICBCthatthe
Commissionerconsidersmightassistintheconductofaninvestigation,ICBCwillpromptlymakeeveryreasonableefforttoprovidetherequireddocumentsorinformationtotheCommissioner,subjecttotheFreedomofInformationandProtectionofPrivacyActandanyotherlawgoverningthedisclosureofpersonalinformation.
5. Anypartythatmaybeadverselyaffectedbyaninvestigationorrecommendationmustbegiventimelynotificationandanadequateandappropriateopportunitytorespondtoanyissuesraisedandanypossiblefindingsorrecommendationsbeforetheyarefinalizedorpublished.Withoutlimitingtheprevioussentence,iftheCommissionerintendstorecommendaremedythathasnotbeensuggestedbythepartiestheCommissionerwillgivebothpartiestheopportunitytorespondtotheproposedremedybeforemakinganyfindingsorrecommendations.
6. IftheCommissionerconsidersitappropriate,evidencemaybetakenfromthecomplainantorarepresentativeofICBCunderoathoraffirmation,eitherverballyorinwriting,butnopersonmaybecompelledtogivesuchevidence.
COMPLETIONOFREVIEW7. AtanystageinthereviewofanunresolvedcustomercomplainttheCommissionermay:
a. RecommendthatanICBCactionordecisionbereconsideredb. RecommendthatanexceptionbemadetoanICBCpolicyorprocedure,having
regardtotheimpactthatmakingsuchanexceptionmayhaveonothercustomers
![Page 50: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
c. RecommendthatanICBCpolicyorprocedurebestudiedorreviewedbytheBoardofDirectorsofICBC,orthatnewpoliciesorproceduresbeadoptedtoaddresscustomerneeds
d. MakeareporttotheExecutiveorBoardofDirectorsofICBCwithrespecttothefindingsofaninvestigation;and
e. DeterminethatnofurtheractionorinvestigationisrequiredIftheCommissionermakesareportorrecommendation,theCommissionermustconcurrentlystateinwritingthereasonsfortherecommendation,includingadescriptionoftheproceduralunfairnessthatledtotherecommendationorreport.IfICBCdeclinestofollowarecommendation,itmuststatetotheCommissioner,inwriting,itsreasonsfordoingso.
8. ICBCwilldesignateamemberofitsseniorexecutivetoactasICBC’sliaisonwiththeCommissioner.TheCommissionermaybringanyconcernswithrespecttotheimplementationofarecommendationtotheattentionoftheexecutiveliaison.
CONFIDENTIALITY
9. Recognizingthatanyunresolvedcustomercomplaintcouldlaterbecomethesubjectof
litigation,andinformationordocumentsreceivedinthecourseofreviewinganunresolvedcustomercomplaintshouldnotloseanyclaimofprivilegewhichmayattachtothem:
a. TheCommissioner,his/herstaffandanyindividuals,includinglegalcounsel,retainedbytheCommissionertoassisthim/herinperforminghis/herdutieswill:
i. MaintaintheconfidentialityofallinformationanddocumentsprovidedtotheCommissioner;
ii. Notdisclosetoanyperson,includingtheotherparty,anyinformationordocumentsprovidedtotheCommissionerbyICBCorthecomplainantwithouttheconsentofthepartywhoprovidedtheinformationordocumenthavingbeenobtainedinadvance;
iii. Ifappropriate,obtainawrittenagreementfromICBCorthecomplainantthatanyconfidentialinformationordocumentssharedwiththemwillbekeptinstrictconfidenceandnotdisclosedtoanyotherpersonunlessrequiredbylaw;and
iv. Notrefertoanyinformationordocumentsinanycorrespondence,reportorrecommendationswithouttheconsentofthepartywhoprovidedtheinformationordocumenthavingbeenobtainedinadvance.
b. ICBCagrees,andthecomplainantwillagreewhenmakingtheunresolved
customercomplaint,thattheywillnotrequesttheCommissioner,his/herstaffandanyindividuals,includinglegalcounsel,retainedbytheCommissionertoassisthim/herinperforminghis/herdutiesbecompelledasawitnessincourtorinanyproceedingsofajudicialnatureinrespectofanythingcomingtothe
![Page 51: 2012 Annual Report - ICBC Home...4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ICBC FAIRNESS COMMISSIONER April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ICBC Fairness Commissioner 2 From the Commissioner 3 1. Introduction](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022060207/5f03ec077e708231d40b6e87/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Commissioner’sknowledgeasaresultofanythingdonepursuanttotheseTermsofReference.
REPORTING10. TheCommissionershallprepareanannualreportfortheBoardofDirectorsandshall
deliverthatreporttotheGovernanceCommitteeoftheBoard.TheCommissionershallappearbeforetheGovernanceCommitteetodiscussthereportandshallalsoappearbeforethatCommitteeortheBoardatanyothertimetheCommitteeortheBoardmayrequestortheCommissionerconsidersnecessary,withrespectto:
a. TheactivitiesoftheCommissioner;b. TheadequacyofICBC’sresponsestotheCommissioner’sinvestigationsand
recommendations,includingadiscussionofthenumberofhis/herrecommendationsthatwerenotacceptedbyICBCandtheexplanationsgivenbyICBCfordecliningtoadoptthem;and
c. CircumstancesthattheCommissionerbelievesrequiretheBoard’sreviewofaspecificpolicyorprocedure.
11. AfterreportingtotheBoardandpermittingtheBoardanopportunitytorespond
withinaperiodoftimethathe/sheconsidersreasonable,theCommissionermay,subjecttoArticle7oftheseTermsofReference,makeapublicreportinrespectofthematterssetoutinArticle10.