Rita Lützhøft om standardisering på det offentlige sags- og dokumentområde
2011.05.06 status standardisering gm-vv cogia
-
Upload
smart-lab -
Category
Technology
-
view
245 -
download
1
Transcript of 2011.05.06 status standardisering gm-vv cogia
Status update on GM-VVKarl-Gustav Pettersson, FMV
Constantinos Giannoulis, DSV/FOI
Swedish VV&A Competence network
2011-05-06
FMV SMART-Lab
Status update on GM-VV
Agenda
GM-VV Document set
GM-VV Volume 1: Introduction and overview
Walkthrough the document
Rationale
Standardization status of GM-VV
Introduktion av SISO
SISO standardiseringsprocess
SISO Balloting-process
Pilot Case Study
Objectives
Findings
Ref:
W.F. Waite AEGIS TG
2004 JSMARTS vision 2020VV&A
Transformation
Representation
Abstraction
The GM-VV
Objectives
Provide a generic framework to develop an argument to justify why identified
models, simulations, underlying data, outcomes and capabilities are believed to
be acceptable for deployment in the target (intended) operational (use) context,
Define the required information and argumentation mechanisms allowing well-
balanced and risk-informed arguments with various levels of formality for
acceptance decision making,
Provide the community with a common language to better facilitate the
communication and co-operation between all participants,
Foundations
Well-established international standards,
knowledge and information management approach, enables formal and tool-
supported sharing, transferring, managing and reusing of verification, validation
and acceptance information at both project and enterprise levels.
The GM-VV document set
The GM-VV Volume 1: Introduction and Overview
The GM-VV Volume 2: Implementation Guide
The GM-VV Volume 3: Reference Manual
The GM-VV
The Generic Methodology for Verification & Validation
M&S/VVA
Organizations
and Personnel
GM-VV Vol 1.
Introduction
and overview
GM-VV Vol 2.
Implementation
guide
GM-VV Vol 3.
Reference
Manual
Is introduced and defined
in Provides guidance on
implementation and use of
Provides technical
and referential
background
information for
Learns the basics
of GM-VV from
the
Apply GM-VV by using the
Obtain VV&A and related background information on and for use within GM-VV
from the
GM-VV Rationale
GM-VV Vol. 1
1
Simulation Interoperability 2
Standards Organization 3
(SISO) 4
5
6
Generic Methodology for 7
Verification and Validation (GM-8
VV) to Support Acceptance of 9
Models, Simulations and Data 10
11
GM-VV Vol. 1: Introduction and 12
Overview 13
14
SISO-GUIDE-00X.2-201x-DRAFT-V1.10.6 15
16
03 - 05 - 2011 17
18
19
Prepared by: 20
SISO Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation 21
Product Development Group 22
(GM-VV PDG) 23
GM-VV standardisation
The GM-VV document set
The GM-VV Volume 1: Introduction and Overview
(soon to be balloted)
The GM-VV Volume 2: Implementation Guide
(more comment rounds, then to be balloted)
The GM-VV Volume 3: Reference Manual
(more comment rounds, not to be balloted)
What is SISO?
Simulation Interoperability Standards
Organization (SISO)
Non profit organization
Based in the US but open to the
international community
About 1200 members (20% non US)
Three annual workshops, two in the US
and one in Europe
Three ways to become a member
Annual fee ~$100
Participate in a conference ~$700
Member of a sponsoring organization
or corporate
Standardization process
http://www.sisostds.org
”SISO’s mission is to provide
an open forum that promotes
the interoperability and reuse
of models and simulations
through the exchange of
ideas, the examination of
technologies, and the
development of standards.”
Development of standard
Maturation of concept
Overview of the SISO standardization process
Standardization process
Sponsor
OrganizationStudy Group
Standing
Study Group
Product Nomination
Product
Development
Group
Balloted
Standard
Product
Support Group
Ballot Pool
SISO Balloting process
Standardization process
Final drafted
product to SAC
for approval
PDG vote to go
to balloting
SAC announce
Ballot
SAC announce
Ballot
SISO
Members
Other
interested
people
Preliminary
Ballot Group
Interme
-diate
Ballot
Group
Membership
rules
Balance
guidelines
Ballot Group
BallotingComment
resolution
Product
approval
Ballot balancing rules
Membership rules:
Apply for membership and
pay fee
Committing to conduct
thorough review and
completing in required time
Representation:
Commercial, Government,
Academic
Interest:
User, Developer, General
Interest
Balance guidelines:
No representation should
exceed 75% and each
category >10%
No organization >25%
No interest >50%
The GM-VV: Pilot Case Study
Pilot Case Study
Rationale
Technology readiness
level is 4 (Component
and/or Breadboard Validated in
Laboratory Environment
Setting)
Test the method in a
real environment
(improve, involve, strengthen)
Objectives
Correctness and utility of
the document set*
Practical applicability of
GM-VV: knowledge &
experience
Educational material
development (tutorials)
Tools (evaluation,
requirements)
Introductio
n
Pilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof
Rijkswaterstaat(2006-2008)
aimed at:
Immediate reduction of
traffic jams by means of
smart, innovative and
practical approaches
About 60 projects in 3 main
categories: Projects aimed at reduction of
regular and incidental traffic
jams
Projects tempting people to
think and act differently
Pilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof
Our Focus:
Flashing lights off On site
Why Flashing Lights
Reduction of speed
Not to draw attention to an
accident
Directive
First vehicle
(fend off car) lights ON
Other cars
(rescue workers) lights OFF
Compliance in practice?
Falls short of expectations
What are the effects of showing one or multiple
flashing lights on: The safety of rescue workers on site, and
Traffic flow
Effect of light color (blue or amber / yellow)?
Effect of time of day (daylight / evening)?
Effect of position accident (own lane or other
direction)?
Pilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof
Approach
5 workshops, 4 nations
(FR, NL, DE, SE)
Focus on Technical
Processes & Products
Spiral Development
(iterative & incremental)
Deliverables
White Paper
Authoritative & Educational
Illustration
Benefits, Limitations &
Improvements
Introductory Tutorial
Presentation
Dissemination for M&S
Community
Illustration & Guidance
Application
Introductio
nPilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof
The content of the document has a steep learning curve with a
high entry level Wording is long, fuzzy, vague and pressumes a lot
Misleading titles creating false expectations
No leading document driving the reader
Weak cross-document proof reading
There is no document that specifies THE methodology Bits & bytes scattered among the 3 documents
HB perspective not clearly communicated
Multiple objectives set
Overlapping information & inconsistencies
Incompatible to SISO product nomination
More cases
The Case
StudyPilot Case Study Scenario: Findings
Tack!
Frågor?
Status Update on GM-VV