2011 OJSHS Evaluation Report · 2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey. 2011 OJSHS PARTICIPANTS A total of...
Transcript of 2011 OJSHS Evaluation Report · 2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey. 2011 OJSHS PARTICIPANTS A total of...
Evaluation Report
Prepared by
Jacob Burgoon, Project Evaluator
Northwest Ohio Center for Excellence in STEM Education
2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ------------------------------------------ 1
EVALUATION METHODS ---------------------------------- 1
2011 OJSHS PARTICIPANTS ----------------------------- 2
PERCEPTIONS OF THE 2011 OJSHS ---------------------- 3
Student Perceptions ------------------------------- 3
Non-Student Perceptions -------------------------- 8
SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE OJSHS ---------------------- 12
APPENDIX A: THE 2011 OJSHS EVALUATION SURVEY ---- 15
2011 Evaluation Report 1
INTRODUCTION
TheOhioJuniorScienceandHumanitiesSymposium(hereafterreferredtoasOJSHS)isan
annualeventinwhichOhiostudentsingrades7to12“competeforscholarshipsand
recognitionbypresentingtheresultsoftheiroriginalresearcheffortsbeforeapanelof
judgesandanaudienceoftheirpeers”1.TheOJSHSispartofthenationalJuniorScienceand
HumanitiesSymposiaProgram,whichisjointlysponsoredbytheUnitedStates
DepartmentsoftheArmy,Navy,andAirForce,incooperationwithleadingresearch
universitiesthroughoutthenation.The2011OJSHStookplaceonMarch23–25at
BowlingGreenStateUniversity,whohostedandsponsoredtheeventalongwiththeNWO
CenterforExcellenceinSTEMEducation.Thepurposeofthisreportistopresentthe
findingsofthe2011OJSHSevaluation.Thereportwillbeginadescriptionofevaluation
methods,followedbyadescriptionofthe2011OJSHSparticipants.Thereportwillthen
summarizetheperceptionsofthe2011OJSHSparticipantsbeforeconcludingwith
recommendationsforfutureOhioJuniorScienceandHumanitiesSymposia.
EVALUATION METHODS
The2011OJSHSwasevaluatedusinganonlinesurveythatwasmadeavailabletothe
participantsattheendofthelastdayoftheevent.Thelinktothesurveywasincludedin
theparticipants’registrationpacket.Thelinkwasalsoe‐mailedtotheparticipantsone
weekaftertheendoftheevent.
Theevaluationsurveyincludedseveralitemsthataskedparticipantstoratethe
qualityofseveralaspectsofthe2011OJSHS,includingthekeynotepresentation,theposter
andpaperjudges,theorganizationofposterpresentationspace,andtheawardsceremony.
ThesurveyalsoaskedparticipatingstudentstoratehoweffectivetheOJSHSwasat
increasingtheirinterestinSTEMresearchandcareers.Thesurveyincludedseveralclosed‐
endedmultiple‐choiceitems(nineforstudentsandfourfornon‐students)andseveral
open‐endeditems(threeforstudentsandfourfornon‐students)thataskedparticipantsto
1CitedfromthenationalJuniorScienceandHumanitieswebsite–www.jshs.org
2011 Evaluation Report 2
writeabouttheirperceptionsofthe2011OJSHSandgivesuggestionsregardinghowit
couldbeimproved.
SeeAppendixAforthe2011OJSHSEvaluationSurvey.
2011 OJSHS PARTICIPANTS
Atotalof120studentsand81non‐studentsparticipatedinthe2011OJSHS.Studentscould
participateinthe2011OJSHSaspaperpresenters,posterpresenters,ordelegates(whodid
notpresentanyresearch).Non‐studentsincludedteachers,parents,paperandposter
judges,OJSHSstaff/volunteers(e.g.,sessionpresiders),andotherguests.Theattendance
numbersaredisplayedinthetablebelow.
Participant Attendance
StudentPresentingaPaper 24
StudentPresentingaPoster 90
StudentDelegate 6
ParentofaParticipatingStudent 11
TeacherofaParticipatingStudent 9
PaperJudge 4
PosterJudge 32
OJSHSStaffandVolunteers 20
OtherGuests 5
Total 201
Demographicinformationwascollectedfromtheparticipatingstudentsviathe
2011OJSHSEvaluationSurvey.MostofthestudentswereparticipatingintheOJSHSforthe
firsttimein2011,andamajorityofthestudentswerefemaleandWhite.Thedemographic
informationisdisplayedinthetablebelow.
2011 Evaluation Report 3
DemographicVariable Values N %
One 56 70.0%
Two 20 25.0%
Numberofyears(including2011)participatingintheOJSHS Three 4 5.0%
Female 47 58.8%Gender
Male 33 41.3%AmericanIndianorAlaskanNative 0 0.0%
Asian 17 21.3%
BlackorAfricanAmerican 1 1.3%
Hispanic 1 1.3%
MiddleEastern 3 3.8%NativeHawaiianorOtherPacificIslander 0 0.0%
Racial/EthnicBackground
White,nonHispanic 57 71.3%
Note:Thetotalsampleincluded80students
Likethestudentparticipants,mostofthenon‐students(38.5%)wereparticipating
intheOJSHSforthefirsttimein2011.Themajorityofthese“first‐timers”wereparents
andposterjudges.Almostaquarter(23.1%)ofthenon‐studentsreportedparticipatingin
theOJSHSforthesixth(ormore)timein2011;mostofthesenon‐studentswereteachers
andpaperjudges.Theremainingnon‐studentsreportedparticipatingintheOJSHSforthe
second(7.7%),third(11.5%),fourth(7.7%),andfifth(11.5%)timein2011.
PERCEPTIONS OF THE 2011 OJSHS
Student Perceptions
Atotalof80studentscompletedtheevaluationsurvey.Theresponseratestothe
evaluationsurveyaredisplayedinthetablebelow.
2011 Evaluation Report 4
StudentType TotalAttendance
CompletedEvaluationSurvey
ResponseRate
PaperPresenter 24 21 87.5%
PosterPresenter 90 58 64.4%
Delegate 6 1 16.7%
Total 120 80 67.7%
Thestudentswereaskedtoratethequalityofseveralcomponentsofthe2011
OJSHS.The2011OJSHSincludedseveraldaytimeandeveningeventsthroughoutitsthree‐
dayduration.However,manyoftheparticipatingstudentsonlyattendedthelastdayofthe
OJSHS,whichwasthedayonwhichthestudentspresentedtheirpapersandposters.For
thisreason,a“thisdoesnotapplytome”optionwasincludedontheevaluationsurvey.
Therefore,thenumberofresponses(n)foreachitemreflectsonlythosestudentswho
actuallyparticipatedinorinteractedwiththeOJSHScomponentinquestion.Thetable
belowcontainsthestudents’meanresponseforeachitem.Thefigureonthenextpage
illustratesthedistributionofthestudents’responses.
OJSHSComponent n Mean
WednesdayandThursdayeveningactivities 67 3.69
Keynotepresentation 69 3.81
Paperandposterjudges 79 2.96
Organizationoftheposterpresentationspace 69 2.97
Organizationofthepaperpresentationspace(s) 65 3.68
Awardsceremony 68 3.38
T‐shirts 78 3.28
2011OJSHSOverall 80 3.70
Note:1=Poor,2=Average,3=Good,4=Excellent
2011 Evaluation Report 5
Wednesday and Thursday evening activities
Keynote Presentation
Paper and Poster Judges
Organization of the poster presentation space
Organization of the paper presentation space(s)
Awards Ceremony T-Shirts
2011 OJSHS Overall
Poor Average Good
Excellent
2011 Evaluation Report 6
Studentswereaskedtowritecommentstoexplaintheirresponsestotheabove
questions.Themajorityofthestudents’commentswerepositive,indicatingthatthe
studentshadapositiveexperienceatthe2011OJSHS.Thetableandfiguresabove
indicatethatstudentsratedthe“paperandposterjudges”andthe“organizationofthe
posterpresentationspace”lowerthananyotheraspectofthe2011OJSHS.Accordingly,
manyofthestudents’responsesaddressedthejudgesandtheposterspace.Threestudents
mentionedthatalargervarietyofjudges(intermsofexpertise)wouldhaveimprovedthe
paperandposterjudging.Severalstudentsnotedthatthespaceforposterpresentations
wastoosmall,andafewstudentsfurthercommentedthatsomestudentshadmorespace
thanothers.
Inadditiontoratingthequalityofthe2011OJSHS,studentswerealsoaskedtorate
theimpactofthe2011OJSHSontheirinterestinSTEM(science,technology,engineering,
andmathematics)researchcareers.Thetableandfigurebelowcontainthestudents’mean
responseanddistributionofresponsesforeachitem,respectively.
Item n Mean
ParticipatingintheOJSHSincreasedmyinterestinSTEMresearch. 79 3.58
TheOJSHSprovidedmewithvaluableopportunitiestonetworkwithotherstudentsandSTEMprofessionals.
80 3.39
TheOJSHSincreasedmydesiretopursueacareerinSTEM. 80 3.30
Note:1=DefinitelyDisagree,2=KindofDisagree,3=KindofAgree,4=DefinitelyAgree
2011 Evaluation Report 7
Thestudentswereaskedtodescribetheirexperienceatthe2011OJSHSintheir
ownwords.Oneofthemainthemesthatemergedfromthestudents’responseswasthe
opportunityforstudentstudentinteraction.Manystudentswroteaboutmeetingnew
peopleatthe2011OJSHS.Someofthestudentswrote:
Ilikedtheopportunitytomeetotherstudentsandlistentotheresearchthattheywereconducting.
Ilikedbeingabletomeetnewpeopleandmakesomefriends.
IlovedgettingtoknowpeoplewhohavesimilarinterestsinSTEMeducation.
Ilikedmeetingandtalkingtopeoplemyownageaboutourprojectsandinterests.
Anothermajortheme,relatedtothefirst,regardingstudents’experiencesatthe
2011OJSHSwaslearningfromothers.Manystudentsmentionedthattheyenjoyed
lookingatandtalkingaboutotherstudents’projects.Studentsreportedlearningmore
aboutscienceandbecomingmoreinterestedinscienceasaresultofinteractingwithother
studentsatthe2011OJSHS.Somestudentswrote:
Itwasgreattoseesuchahighqualityofprojectsandknowwhatotherswerecapableofdoingworkatsuchahighlevel.Itreallyinspiredme.
Interest in STEM Research
Networking Opportunities
Desire to Pursue STEM careers
Definitely Disagree Kind of Disagree Kind of Agree
Definitely Agree
2011 Evaluation Report 8
Ireallyenjoyedseeingotherpeople’sprojectsandresearch.TherearemanyfieldsthatIfoundveryinterestingandneverwouldhavethoughttoexplore.
IlovedthatIwasbeingexposedtootherpeoplethatdidresearchinlevelshigherthanmebecauseithelpedmecreateideasofprojectsthatIcoulddo.
Myexperienceatthe2011OJSHShasmademeevenmoreinterestedinscience,anditwasveryinspiringwatchingthepaperpresentersandhasmademestartthinkingofabigger,moreadvancedprojectfornextyear.
Mostofthestudentswhocommentedaboutthenon‐presentationactivities(i.e.,ice
skating,curling,labtours)mentionedthattheyenjoyedthem,althoughtherewereafew
studentswhosuggestedthatthelabtoursbemadeoptional.Onethemethatemerged
regardingfromstudents’responsesaboutthenonpresentationactivitieswasadesire
formorefreetime.Althoughmoststudentsmentionedthattheyenjoyedtheactivities,
manyindicatedthattheywouldhavelikedmorefreetimetodowhattheywanted.Some
studentswrote:
Iwouldmaybeliketobebackatthehotelalittleearliertohavetimespentrelaxing,buttheactivitieswereenjoyable.
Ididnotlikethelackoffreedomgivenduringthedaystowhatwewant.
Ididnotlikethefactthatwedidnothavealotofdowntimetointeractwith[otherstudents].
Finally,83%ofstudentswhoareeligibletoreturnnextyear(i.e.,not12thgraders)
reportedthatisveryormoderatelylikelythattheywillbeinvolvedwiththeOJSHSnext
year.
Non-Student Perceptions
Atotalof26non‐studentscompletedtheevaluationsurvey.Theresponseratestothe
evaluationsurveyaredisplayedinthetablebelow.
2011 Evaluation Report 9
Non‐studentType
TotalAttendance
CompletedEvaluationSurvey
ResponseRate
Parent 11 2 18.2%
Teacher 9 7 77.8%
PaperJudge 4 3 75.0%
PosterJudge 32 9 28.1%OJSHSStaff/Volunteer 20 5 25.0%
Total 76 26 34.2%
Likethestudents,thenon‐studentparticipantswereaskedtorateseveral
componentsofthe2011OJSHS.Manyofthenon‐studentparticipants(e.g.,posterand
paperjudges)onlyparticipatedinthelastdayofthe2011OJSHS.Therefore,theresponses
to“onlineregistrationprocess,”“WednesdayandThursdayeveningactivities,”“keynote
presentation,”and“awardsceremony”mostlyrepresentteachersandparentsof
participatingstudents.Thetablebelowcontainsthenon‐students’meanresponsetoeach
item.Thefigureonthenextpageillustratesthenon‐students’distributionofresponsesfor
eachitem.
OJSHSComponent n Mean
Onlineregistrationprocess 11 3.00
WednesdayandThursdayeveningactivities 12 3.83
Keynotepresentation 15 4.00
Organizationoftheposterpresentationspace 22 3.45
Organizationofthepaperpresentationspace(s) 17 3.82
Awardsceremony 12 3.58
2011OJSHSOverall 22 3.77
Note:1=Poor,2=Average,3=Good,4=Excellent
2011 Evaluation Report 10
Online Registration
Wednesday and Thursday evening activities
Keynote presentation Organization of the poster presentation space
Organization of the paper presentation space(s)
Awards Ceremony
2011 OJSHS Overall
Poor Average Good
Excellent
2011 Evaluation Report 11
Non‐studentparticipantswereaskedtowritecommentstoexplaintheirresponses
totheabovequestions.Thetableandfiguresaboveindicatethatnonstudentsrated
the“onlineregistration”andthe“organizationoftheposterpresentationspace”lower
thananyotheraspectofthe2011OJSHS.Thecommentsexplainedthatthe“posterswere
abitmorecrowdedthisyearthaninthepast”andthatthere“needstobebetterdefined
posterspaceforeachparticipant”.Theonlycommentabouttheonlineregistrationwas
that“teachersneedalittlemoreinformationtoensurethatthestudentsareregistered”.
Inadditiontoratingthequalityofthe2011OJSHS,thenon‐studentparticipants
werealsoaskedtodescribetheimpactofthe2011OJSHSonstudents’interestinand
understandingofSTEM.Althoughitislikelythatmostoftheparticipatingstudents
werealreadyinterestedinSTEM,manynonstudentparticipantssuggestedthatthe
OJSHSprovidedstudentswithmotivationtocontinuelearningandconducting
researchaboutSTEM.Someoftheparticipantswrote:
Theexperienceseemstogreatlymotivatethestudentstodomoreinthefield.Theywanttoresearchmoreanddohigherqualityworkafterwatchingthepaperpresentations.
Theyoungerstudentsespeciallywereappreciativeoffeedbackandshowedmarkedinterestinreturningnextyear.
Thiseventpiquesourstudents’interestsandhasmanyinterestedincontinuingresearchandreturningnextyear!
Thenon‐studentparticipantswerealsoaskedtodescribetheirexperienceofthe
2011OJSHSintheirownwords.Theoveralltoneoftheresponseswaspositive–many
participantsreportedthattheyenjoyeddifferentaspectsoftheeventaswellastheeventin
general.Theposterjudgesspecificallystatedthattheyenjoyedtalkingtothestudents.One
posterjudgewrote:
Myexperienceasaposterjudgewasenjoyableandinteresting.Thestudentswereverywellspoken,preparedandenthusiastic,andspeakingtothemwasthebestpartoftheexperience.
2011 Evaluation Report 12
Manyofthenon‐studentparticipantsechoedthecommentsofthestudents,
emphasizingtheroleofOJSHSinfosteringpositivestudent‐studentinteractions.Two
participantswrote:
It’smorethanacompetition.Itallowsthestudentstointeractwithoneanotherandshareideas.Ilovethataspectofit.
Ienjoythefactthatforabout48hoursmykidscanhangouttogetherwithothergreatkidsandbuildrelationshipsaswellaslearnbetterresearchskills.
Finally,87.5%ofthenon‐studentparticipantsreportedthatisverylikelythatthey
willbeinvolvedwiththeOJSHSnextyear.Theremaining12.5%reportedthatitisnotall
likelythattheywillbeinvolvedwithOJSHSnextyear.
SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE OJSHS
Thefindingsfromthe2011OJSHSevaluationsurveyindicatethatthe2011OJSHSwas
perceivedtobeahigh‐qualityandimpactfuleventbystudentandnon‐studentparticipants
alike.Thefindingsdemonstratethatthe2011OJSHSprovidedmanyopportunitiesfor
studentstointeractwithandlearnfromotherstudentsandSTEMprofessionals,and
helpedstimulatemoreinterestinstudentstolearnaboutandconductSTEMresearch.
Thesepositivefindingsnotwithstanding,therearestillwaysinwhichtheOJSHScouldbe
improved.
AnyeventsuchasOJSHSshouldcontinuallyseektoimproveitselfbysoliciting
suggestionsfromitsstakeholders.Inkeepingwiththisphilosophy,all2011OJSHS
participantswereaskedtoprovidesuggestionsforhowtheOJSHScouldbeimprovedinthe
future.Thesuggestionsthatfollowarebasedontheparticipants’reportedsuggestionsas
wellastheparticipants’otherresponsesandcomments.
2011 Evaluation Report 13
1 MODIFY THE SYSTEM BY WHICH POSTERS ARE JUDGED
Thisgeneralsuggestionisactuallycomprisedoftwomorespecificsuggestionsaboutthe
posterjudgingsystem.Manyoftheparticipants(bothstudentsandnon‐students)
commentedontheposterjudging,andsuggestedsomewaysthatitcouldbeimproved.
Onesuggestionthatcamemostlyfromparticipatingstudentswastoensurea
greatervarietyamongthejudgesintermsoftheirexpertise.Somestudentsperceivedthat
mostofthejudgescamefromthe“hardscience”fields,andsuggestedthatmorejudgesbe
recruitedfromfieldslikepsychologyandothersocialsciences.
Anothersuggestionthatwasgivenbystudentsandnon‐studentsalikewastohave
twojudgesevaluateeachposter.Thissuggestioncouldbebasedonthefactthejudging
rubriccontainsseverallargescalesthatmightbeuseddifferentlybytwodifferentjudges.
Havingateamofjudgesforeachstudentmighthelptostandardizethescoringprocess.
Someoftheparticipantswrote:
Thejudgingsystemwasperhapsalittletoosubjective–astructurewithmultiplejudgesperposterwouldhelp.
Thesubjectivityoftheposterjudging–eachstudentevaluatedbyonlyonejudge–maynotbefairtoallthestudents.
2 RE-ORGANIZE THE SPACE FOR POSTER PRESENTATIONS
Issuesregardingthespaceforposterpresentationswereamongthemostcommentedon
bythe2011OJSHSparticipants.Bothstudentsandnon‐studentsbelievethatchangesneed
tobemadetoimprovetheposterspace.Thegreatestconcernwasthelackofspacethat
studentshadtopresenttheirposters.Onenon‐studentparticipantsuggestedthata
ballroombeusedinsteadoftheroomthatwasusedthisyear.Someoftheparticipants
wrote:
Theonlythingthatwasslightlynegativewasthatposterswerecrammedveryclosenexttooneanother,sotherewaslittlespacetotalktotheposter’spresenter.
Wishtherewasmorespaceforposterpresenters.
2011 Evaluation Report 14
Anotherissueregardingtheposterspacewasthelackofconsistencyintheamount
ofroomthateachstudenthadtosetuptheirposter.Sincetheposterspacewasmadeupof
aseriesoftallpanels,studentswhoarrivedearlycouldpotentiallyusemorespacethan
thosewhoarrivedlate.Onesolutionmightbetoestablishmeasurementstandards(for
howtallandwideapostercanbe)towhichstudentsmustadhere.Notsurprisingly,the
posterpresenterswerethemainsourceforthissuggestion.Someofthestudentswrote:
IenjoyedeverythingIwasinvolvedin,butIjustnoticedthatsomestudentsdidn’thaveasmuchspaceasothersintheposterjudging.
Ithinkitneedstobemorestrictlyenforcedaboutspaceforposterpresentation.Myprojectreceivedabout2feetlessthanitwassupposedtoinwidthduetoothers’spaceexpandments[sic].
Thespacefortheposterswerevaried.Forexample,Ihadabout1and¾panelswhilethegirlnexttobeonly[had]1and¼panels.Thetwopeoplenexttoherbothtookalittlemorethan2panelsforthemselves.BothIandthegirlnexttomewouldhavelikedtohavemorespacetolaystuffout.
3 CONTINUE TO OFFER ICE SKATING, CURLING, AND CAMPUS LAB TOURS
Manystudentsprovidedpositivecommentsregardingthenon‐presentationactivities.
Specifically,thestudentsmentionedthattheyenjoyediceskating,curling,andthecampus
labtours.Somestudents,however,suggestedthatthelabtoursbemadeoptionalorthat
studentsshouldbeallowedtochoosewhichlab(s)theytour.Thiswouldallowstudentsto
havemorefreetimeiftheychoseto,whichwasanothercommonmessageamongthe
students.
2011 Evaluation Report 15
APPENDIX A:
THE 2011 OJSHS EVALUATION SURVEY
2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey
Members of the Ohio Junior Science and Humanities Symposium Program Evaluation Committee are always seeking ways to improve future Symposia. The best way to do this is to find out what participants think of the Symposium, and use their comments and suggestions to make future Symposia better. Please take a few minutes to complete the following evaluation survey and tell us what you thought about the 2011 Ohio Junior Science and Humanities Symposium. We appreciate your cooperation! Thank you for your assistance in improving the Ohio JSHS.
Which of the following describes you and your participation at OJSHS?
We Hope You Enjoyed the 2011 Ohio Junior Science and Humanities Symposium!
Student presented a paper
nmlkj
Student presented a poster
nmlkj
Student delegate did not present a paper or poster
nmlkj
Parent of a participating student
nmlkj
Teacher of a participating student
nmlkj
Paper judge
nmlkj
Poster judge
nmlkj
OJSHS staff member
nmlkj
Other (please specify)
nmlkj
2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey
How many years (counting this one) have you participated in the OJSHS?
What is your gender?
Which of following best describes the way you define your racial/ethnic background?
Students, Tell Us What You Think!
One (this is my first year)
nmlkj
Two
nmlkj
Three
nmlkj
Four
nmlkj
Five
nmlkj
Six
nmlkj
Female
nmlkj
Male
nmlkj
American Indian or Alaskan Native
gfedc
Asian
gfedc
Black or African American
gfedc
Hispanic
gfedc
Middle Eastern
gfedc
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
gfedc
White, non Hispanic
gfedc
2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation SurveyPlease rate the following aspects of the 2011 OJSHS.
Please rate your level of agreement/disagreement with the following statements.
Participating in the OJSHS (conducting and presenting my research) increased my interest in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and/or mathematics) research.
The OJSHS provided me with valuable opportunities to network with other students and STEM professionals.
The OJSHS increased my desire to purse a career in STEM.
Poor Average Good ExcellentThis doesn't apply to
meWednesday and Thursday evening activities (e.g., ice skating, banquet)
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Keynote Presentation (Gene Poor, "Searching for the AHA")
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Paper and poster judges nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Organization of the poster presentation space
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Organization of the paper presentation space(s)
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Awards ceremony nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Tshirts nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
2011 OJSHS overall nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Definitely Disagree Kind of Disagree Kind of Agree Definitely Agree
Please select your choice. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Definitely Disagree Kind of Disagree Kind of Agree Definitely Agree
Please select your choice. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Definitely Disagree Kind of Disagree Kind of Agree Definitely Agree
Please select your choice. nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Please provide some comments to futher explain your above ratings.
55
66
2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey
How many years (counting this one) have you been involved with the OJSHS?
Please rate the following aspects of the 2011 OJSHS.
As a [Q1], what is your perception of the 2011 OJSHS's impact on students' interest in and understanding of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics)?
Please Tell Us What You Think
Poor Average Good ExcellentThis doesn't apply to
me
Online registration process nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Wednesday and Thursday evening activities (e.g., ice skating, banquet)
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Keynote presentation (Gene Poor, "Searching for the AHA")
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Organization of the poster presentation space
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Organization of the paper presentation space(s)
nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
Awards ceremony nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
2011 OJSHS overall nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj
55
66
One (this is my first year)
nmlkj
Two
nmlkj
Three
nmlkj
Four
nmlkj
Five
nmlkj
Six or more
nmlkj
Please provide some comments to futher explain your above ratings.
55
66
2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey2011 OJSHS Evaluation Survey
Please describe your experience at the 2011 OJSHS in your own words. Include the the aspects of your experience that you liked as well as those that you didn't like.
What suggestions do you have for next year's OJSHS? Is there is anything that you definitely would want to see kept or removed? Is there anything you would change or add?
How likely is it that you will participate in/be involved with the OJSHS next year? Students in the 12th grade, please select "This does not apply to me".
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COOPERATION!
We Want to Know About Your 2011 OJSHS Experience
55
66
55
66
Not at all likely
nmlkj
Very slightly likely
nmlkj
Moderately likely
nmlkj
Very likely
nmlkj
This does not apply to me
nmlkj