2011 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL scorecardscorecard.lcv.org/.../files/LCV_Scorecard_2011.pdf · 2011...

first session of the 112th Congress

2011 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL

scorecard

LCV sCoreCard adVisory Committee *

CAROL ANdREssEnvironmental Defense Fund

ANNA AuRILIOEnvironment America

MELANIE BELLER The Wilderness Society

BRENdON CEChOVICWashington Conservation Voters

ROBERT dEwEyDefenders of Wildlife

MAuREEN dROuINMaine League of Conservation Voters

JEssICA FEINgOLd-LIEBERsONThe Humane Society of the United States

MARTy hAydENEarthjustice

dAVId JENkINsRepublicans for Environmental Protection

AdAM kOLTONNational Wildlife Federation

CRAIg LAshERPopulation Action International

ELIsE RussELL LIguORINational Parks Conservation Association

dAMON MOgLENFriends of the Earth

BRIAN MOORENational Audubon Society

MELINdA PIERCESierra Club

kERRy sChuMANN Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters

CINdy shOgANAlaska Wilderness League

sCOTT sLEsINgERNatural Resources Defense Council

kAREN sTEuERPew Environment Group

ROBERT TEILhETGeorgia Conservation Voters

MARChANT wENTwORThUnion of Concerned Scientists

LCV issues & aCCountabiLity Committee *

BRENT BLACkwELdERFriends of the Earth

MARCIA BysTRyNNew York League of Conservation Voters

RuTh hENNIgFund for the Republic

wEsLEy wARRENNatural Resources Defense Council

LCV board of direCtors *

* Organizations are shown for identification purposes only

JOhN h. AdAMsNatural Resources Defense Council

PAuL AusTINConservation Minnesota & Conservation Minnesota Voter Center

BRENT BLACkwELdER, hONORARyFriends of the Earth

ThE hONORABLE shERwOOd BOEhLERT, VICE ChAIRThe Accord Group

ThE hONORABLE CAROL BROwNER

MARCIA BysTRyN, sECRETARyNew York League of Conservation Voters

CARRIE CLARkNorth Carolina League of Conservation Voters

MANNy dIAzLydecker Diaz

gEORgE T. FRAMPTON, JR.Covington & Burling, LLP

wAdE gREENE, hONORARyRockefeller Family & Associates

LIsA guThRIEVirginia League of Conservation Voters

RAMPA R. hORMELEnlyst Fund

JOhN huNTINg, hONORARyJohn Hunting & Associates

TOM kIERNAN, TREAsuRERNational Parks Conservation Association

MIChAEL kIEsChNICkCREDO Mobile

PETER MANdELsTAM

wINsOME MCINTOsh, hONORARy

wILLIAM h. MEAdOws IIIThe Wilderness Society

JORgE MuRsuLI

sCOTT A. NAThAN, ChAIRThe Baupost Group, LLC

JOhN d. POdEsTACenter for American Progress

BILL ROBERTs

LARRy ROCkEFELLERAmerican Conservation Association

ThEOdORE ROOsEVELT IV, hONORARy ChAIRBarclays Capital

LAuRA TuRNER sEydELTurner Foundation

MARyANNE TAgNEy-JONEs

LyNdE B. uIhLEINBrico Fund, LLC

kAThLEEN wELChCorridor Partners, LLC

contents

1. AnAlysis

Overview of the 1st Session of the 112th Congress 2

Voting Summary 4

2. senAte scores

Vote Descriptions 7

Senate Votes 10

3. House scores

Vote Descriptions 16

House Votes 26

The nonprofit League of Conservation Voters (LCV) has

published a National Environmental Scorecard every Con-

gress since 1970, the year it was founded by leaders of the

environmental movement following the first Earth Day.

LCV works to turn environmental values into national priorities.

This edition of the National Environmental Scorecard provides objec-

tive, factual information about the most important environmental legis-

lation considered and the corresponding voting records of all members

of the first session of the 112th Congress. This Scorecard represents the

consensus of experts from about 20 respected environmental and con-

servation organizations who selected the key votes on which members of

Congress should be scored. LCV scores votes on the most important issues

of the year, including energy, global warming, public health, public lands

and wildlife conservation, and spending for environmental programs. The

votes included in this Scorecard presented members of Congress with a

real choice and help distinguish which legislators are working for environ-

mental protection. Except in rare circumstances, the Scorecard excludes

consensus action on the environment and issues on which no recorded

votes occurred.

Dedicated environmentalists and national leaders volunteered their

time to identify and research crucial votes. We extend special thanks to

our Board of Directors, Issues & Accountability Committee, and Score-

card Advisory Committee for their valuable input.

CoVEr phoTo of oILy BIrD By rpEDro rAmIrEz Jr./USfWS.

2 www.lcv.org|2011NationalEnvironmentalScorecard·LCV

2005 Overview2011 overview

In 2011, the republican leadership of the U.S. house of representatives unleashed a truly breathtaking

and unprecedented assault on the environment and public health, the breadth and depth of which have

made the current house of representatives the most anti-environmental in our nation’s history. The

2011 National Environmental Scorecard is a sad testament to the radical nature of the first session of

the 112th Congress in the house; this Scorecard includes so many votes that the house votes section

spans two pages for the first time ever.

The 2011 National Environmental Scorecard includes 35

house votes, which is far more than have ever been in-

cluded in any previous Scorecard. But to be clear: many

others warranted inclusion and would have been included

in a typical year. In fact, all told there were more than

200 house votes on the environment and public health

in 2011. In many cases, only final passage votes are in-

cluded here even though lawmakers voted on countless

amendments with enormous environmental implications.

With rare exception, amendments to improve anti-envi-

ronmental bills failed, while amendments to make them

even worse passed.

The good news is that while the house voted against the

environment an unprecedented number of times, both the

U.S. Senate and the obama administration stood firm

against the vast majority of these attacks. Indeed, not

only did the nation’s bedrock environmental protections

emerge largely unscathed from 2011, the obama adminis-

tration also made major progress through administrative

actions to protect our air and water.

The first session of the 112th Congress got off to a partic-

ularly appalling start with h.r. 1, the house Continuing

resolution spending bill, must-pass legislation to fund the

federal government and avoid a shut down. Even before

it reached the house floor, h.r. 1 included sweeping as-

saults on the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the

wildlife and wild places Americans hold dear; it also made

drastic cuts to transit, energy efficiency, and renewable

energy while protecting the profits of polluting industries.

As if that weren’t enough, members of Congress proceed-

ed to offer a dizzying array of anti-environmental riders

to h.r. 1 on the house floor. In light of what was at the

time the most anti-environmental bill ever, the League of

Conservation Voters took the extraordinary step of cre-

ating a Continuing resolution Special Edition National

Environmental Scorecard. Nine of those 25 votes are

included here.

Even though h.r. 1 included more attacks on the envi-

ronment and public health than usually occur in an entire

year, the house republican leadership was just getting

started. An astounding number of attacks soon followed

and were sustained over the course of the year. Indeed, the

parade of horrible house votes in 2011 left virtually no

aspect of the environment and public health untouched.

In the summer months alone, the house voted on

numerous bills and amendments with major implica-

tions for our air, water, land, and wildlife. These in-

clude sweeping bills such as the fy12 house Interior and

1. An

Aly

sis

2011NationalEnvironmentalScorecard·LCV|www.lcv.org 3

Environment Appropriations bill, which was brought

to the house floor with more than three dozen anti-

environmental riders already included, thus replacing

h.r. 1 as the single worst attack ever on the environ-

ment and public health. fortunately, that bill was pulled

from consideration and never passed the house. There

were targeted attacks on environmental statutes, includ-

ing the Clean Water Act, which threatened the quality

and safety of the water Americans use for fishing, swim-

ming, and drinking. There were bills to cut much-need-

ed funding for energy efficiency, climate change adapta-

tion, the Environmental protection Agency (EpA), and

the Department of the Interior. Additionally, there was

legislation to expedite a decision on the Keystone XL tar

sands pipeline, a dangerous project that would transport

the dirtiest oil on the planet right through the middle of

the United States in order to export it. The house took

many other anti-environmental votes during the summer

as well.

As if the house had not yet done enough damage, major-

ity Leader Eric Cantor (r-VA) released a fall agenda just

before the house returned from its August recess in which

he laid out plans to gut ten so-called “job-killing regula-

tions,” most of which are critically important to protect-

ing public health and the environment. The house voted

on the Cantor Agenda throughout the fall, passing an un-

precedented nine abysmal bills between mid-September

and early December. These included multiple rollback

bills to prevent the EpA from enacting critical regulations

under the Clean Air Act to protect public health and the

environment, as well as to block specific rules to reduce

mercury and other toxic air pollution from power plants,

cement kilns, industrial boilers and incinerators.

fortunately, the Senate stood in sharp contrast to the

house in 2011. There are just 11 Senate votes included

in the 2011 National Environmental Scorecard, and they

include strong rebukes to house votes on key issues such

as upholding new rules to reduce power plant pollution

and defending the EpA’s ability to issue lifesaving public

health protections.

While the Senate was able to block many of the most dam-

aging bills passed by the house, the obama administra-

tion also made clear its opposition to the house agenda,

offering numerous strong statements that catering to pol-

luters is not a jobs agenda. The obama administration

also made major progress through administrative action

on the next round of fuel efficiency and global warming

emissions standards for cars, the Cross State Air pollution

rule and the mercury and Air Toxics Standards to reduce

power plant pollution, a delay of the harmful Keystone XL

tar sands pipeline, and more. That is not to say there were

not disappointments on the administrative side, including

the decision to delay critically needed updated smog stan-

dards, but on balance the obama administration accom-

plished a lot in 2011.

As we begin 2012, it could not be clearer that we stand

at a crossroads when it comes to the kind of planet we

will leave our children. LCV is grateful to the obama

administration, the Senate, allies in the house, and the

millions of people across the country who helped to en-

sure that the house leadership did not succeed in gutting

our nation’s cornerstone environmental and public health

protections in 2011. We look forward to continuing to

work together in 2012 and beyond to protect the planet

for future generations.


voting summAry

s en ate

HOuse

2011 stAte AverAges

STATE SENATE HOUSEAlabama 14 21Alaska 55 11Arizona 9 33Arkansas 45 16California 100 60Colorado 100 42Connecticut 100 97Delaware 100 94Florida 55 31Georgia 5 33Hawaii 91 97Idaho 9 9Illinois 55 46Indiana 0 29Iowa 45 53Kansas 0 6Kentucky 14 35Louisiana 50 20Maine 59 91Maryland 100 74Massachusetts 68 94Michigan 91 43Minnesota 86 41Mississippi 5 26Missouri 45 37Montana 91 9Nebraska 27 15Nevada 37 26New Hampshire 55 29New Jersey 100 67New Mexico 100 65New York 100 72North Carolina 55 50North Dakota 45 6Ohio 45 35Oklahoma 14 11Oregon 100 73Pennsylvania 50 38Rhode Island 100 96South Carolina 18 20South Dakota 45 14Tennessee 18 26Texas 9 26Utah 18 15Vermont 95 97Virginia 100 41Washington 100 61West Virginia 82 27Wisconsin 50 39Wyoming 9 11

1. An

Aly

sis


Highest House Delegations:Connecticut 97% · hawaii 97% · Vermont 97% · rhode Island 96% · Delaware 94% · massachusetts 94% · maine 91%

House Scores of 100:ArizonA Grijalva CAliforniA Chu · hahn · honda · Lee, B. · Napolitano · roybal-Allard · Woolsey ColorAdo DeGette floridA Wasserman Schultz GeorGiA Lewis, John MArylAnd Van hollen MiChiGAn Clarke, h. Missouri Cleaver new Jersey holt new york Bishop, T. · Clarke, y. · Israel · Serrano rhode

islAnd Cicilline VirGiniA Connolly · moran, James · Scott, r. wAshinGton Inslee

Lowest House Delegations: Kansas 6% · North Dakota 6% · Idaho 9% · montana 9%

House Scores of Less than 10:AlAbAMA Bonner · rogers, mike D. ArizonA flake · franks, T. · Quayle ArkAnsAs Womack CAliforniA Calvert · Dreier · Gallegly · herger · hunter · Issa · Lungren · mcCarthy, K. · mcClintock · miller, Gary · Nunes · rohrabacher · royce ColorAdo Coffman · Lamborn floridA Adams · mack · miller, J. · Nugent · posey · ross, D. · Southerland GeorGiA Broun · Gingrey · Graves, T. · Kingston · price, T. · Scott, A. · Westmoreland, L. · Woodall idAho Labrador illinois roskam · Walsh indiAnA Burton · pence · rokita · Stutzman · young, T. iowA King, S. kAnsAs huelskamp · Jenkins · pompeo · yoder kentuCky Davis, G. · rogers, h. louisiAnA fleming · Landry, J. · Scalise MArylAnd Bartlett · harris MiChiGAn Amash · Benishek · huizenga · Walberg MinnesotA Bachmann · Kline, J. Mississippi harper · Nunnelee · palazzo Missouri Akin · Graves, S. · hartzler · Long · Luetkemeyer MontAnA rehberg nebrAskA Smith, Adrian neVAdA Amodei · heck · heller new Jersey Garrett new MexiCo pearce new york Buerkle · Turner, B. north CArolinA Ellmers · foxx · mchenry · myrick north dAkotA Berg ohio Chabot · Gibbs, B. · Johnson, B. · Jordan · Latta · renacci oklAhoMA Cole · Lankford · Lucas · Sullivan pennsylVAniA Kelly · pitts · Shuster south CArolinA Duncan · Gowdy · mulvaney · Scott, T. · Wilson, J. tennessee Black, D. · Blackburn, m. · DesJarlais · Duncan · fincher · fleischmann · roe texAs Brady, K. · Burgess · Canseco · Carter · Conaway · Culberson · farenthold · Gohmert · hall, r. · hensarling · Johnson, S. · marchant · mcCaul · Neugebauer · olson · paul, ron · poe · Sessions, p. · Smith, Lamar · Thornberry utAh Bishop, r. · Chaffetz wAshinGton hastings, D. · mcmorris rodgers wisConsin Duffy · ribble · ryan, p. · Sensenbrenner

2011 House HigH And low scores

Highest Senate Delegations:California 100% · Colorado 100% · Connecticut 100% · Delaware 100% · maryland 100% · New Jersey 100% · New mexico 100% · New york 100% · oregon 100% · rhode Island 100% · Virginia 100% · Washington 100%

Senate Scores of 100:CAliforniA Boxer · feinstein ColorAdo Bennet · Udall, m. ConneCtiCut Blumenthal · Lieberman delAwAre Carper · Coons floridA Nelson, Bill hAwAii Akaka MArylAnd Cardin · mikulski MAssAChusetts Kerry neVAdA reid, h. new Jersey Lautenberg · menendez new MexiCo Bingaman · Udall, T. new york Gillibrand · Schumer north CArolinA hagan oreGon merkley · Wyden rhode islAnd reed, J. · Whitehouse VerMont Sanders VirGiniA Warner · Webb wAshinGton Cantwell · murray west VirGiniA rockefeller

Lowest Senate Delegations:Indiana 0% · Kansas 0% · Georgia 5% · mississippi 5% · Arizona 9% · Idaho 9% · Texas 9% · Wyoming 9%

Senate Scores of 0:GeorGiA Chambliss indiAnA Coats · Lugar iowA Grassley kAnsAs moran, Jerry · roberts Mississippi Wicker Missouri Blunt nebrAskA Johanns neVAdA Ensign north dAkotA hoeven ohio portman south dAkotA Thune

2011 senAte HigH And low scores


SENatE COMMIttEE CHaIR SCORE RaNKINGMEMBER SCORE

agriculture,NutritionandForestry Stabenow(MI) 91 Roberts(KS) 0

appropriations Inouye(HI) 82 Cochran(MS) 9

Commerce,Scienceandtransportation Rockefeller(WV) 100 Hutchison(tX) 9

EnergyandNaturalResources Bingaman(NM) 100 Murkowski(aK) 18

EnvironmentandPublicWorks Boxer(Ca) 100 Inhofe(OK) 18

SENatECOMMIttEELEaDERaVERaGE CHaIRS 95 RaNKINGMEMBERS 11

HOuSE COMMIttEE CHaIR SCORE RaNKINGMEMBER SCORE

agriculture Lucas(OK-03) 9 Peterson(MN-07) 20

appropriations Rogers,Harold(KY-05) 9 Dicks(Wa-06) 97

EnergyandCommerce upton(MI-06) 17 Waxman(Ca-30) 97

NaturalResources Hastings,Doc(Wa-04) 9 Markey(Ma-07) 97

Science,Space,andtechnology Hall,Ralph(tX-04) 6 Johnson,EddieBernice(tX-30) 89

transportationandInfrastructure Mica(FL-07) 11 Rahall(WV-03) 51

HOuSECOMMIttEELEaDERaVERaGE CHaIRS 10 RaNKINGMEMBERS 75

rAting tHe leAdersHip of environmentAl committees

pArty leAders’ scores

SENatEDemocratS Score repubLicanS Score

Reid(NV),MajorityLeader 100 McConnell(KY),MinorityLeader 9

Durbin(IL),MajorityWhip 91 Kyl(aZ),MinorityWhip 9

Schumer(NY),ConferenceViceChair 100 alexander,Lamar(tN),ConferenceChair 27

LEaDERSHIPaVERaGE 97 LEaDERSHIPaVERaGE 15

HOuSEDemocratS Score repubLicanS Score

Boehner*(OH-08),SpeakeroftheHouse N/a

Pelosi(Ca-08),MinorityLeader 89 Cantor(Va-07),MajorityLeader 11

Hoyer(MD-05),MinorityWhip 97 McCarthy,Kevin(Ca-22),MajorityWhip 9

Clyburn(SC-06),assistantMinorityLeader 91 Hensarling(tX-05),ConferenceChairman 6

Larson,John(Ct-01),CaucusChairman 97 Price,tom(Ga-06),PolicyCommitteeChairman 9

LEaDERSHIPaVERaGE 94 LEaDERSHIPaVERaGE 9

* The Speaker of the house votes at his discretion.


2011 senAte vote descriptions

1. Sweeping environmental Funding and policy aSSault (H.r. 1)h.r. 1, the full-year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, which at the time it passed the house was the greatest legislative assault ever on the environment and public health, included massive funding cuts and policy assaults on our air, water, wildlife and wild places. on february 19, the house passed h.r. 1 (house roll call vote 147). on march 9, the Senate rejected h.r. 1 by a vote of 44-56 (Senate roll call vote 36). no iS tHe pro-en-

vironment vote. The obama administration and Senate leadership subsequently stood strong in negotiations with the house and insisted that most—but not all—of the anti-environmental riders from h.r. 1 be dropped before agreeing to the final compromise bill, h.r. 1473, which the president signed into law on April 15.

2. global warming pollutionSenate minority Leader mitch mcConnell (r-Ky) offered an amendment to S. 493, small business reauthori-zation legislation officially titled the SBIr/STTr reauthorization Act of 2011, to repeal the scientific finding by the EpA that greenhouse gases endanger human health and the environment, to permanently block the EpA from reducing greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, and to undermine fuel economy standards. This radical amendment would jeopardize public health and the environment and increase our dangerous de-pendence on oil. on April 6, the Senate rejected three other anti-environmental amendments—sponsored by Senators Jay rockefeller (D-WV), Debbie Stabenow (D-mI), and max Baucus (D-mT)—to weaken or delay the EpA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act and then proceeded to reject the mc-Connell amendment by a vote of 50-50 (Senate roll call vote 54). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. on April 7, the house passed h.r. 910, which is identical to the mcConnell amendment (house roll call vote 249). At the end of 2011, the EpA’s ability to reduce greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act remained firmly intact.

3. oil SubSidieSSenator robert menendez (D-NJ) sponsored S. 940, the Close Big oil Tax Loopholes Act, which would close tax loopholes for oil companies, since their outsized profits make it clear that they do not need tax-payer handouts. At a time when our fiscal situation is prompting cuts to critical programs, including envi-ronmental and clean energy investments, our government should not be subsidizing massive oil companies that reported profits of nearly $1 trillion during the past decade. on may 17, the Senate failed to achieve the 60-vote threshold needed to pass a motion to proceed to the consideration of S. 940. The motion failed on a 52-48 vote (Senate roll call vote 72). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote.

4. oFFSHore drillingSenate minority Leader mitch mcConnell (r-Ky) introduced S. 953, the deceptively titled offshore produc-tion and Safety Act of 2011, which would expand offshore drilling and make it more dangerous by enacting oversight standards that are weaker than those in place before the catastrophic 2010 Bp Deepwater horizon oil spill disaster in the Gulf of mexico, which tragically killed 11 workers, wreaked havoc on Gulf coast busi-nesses in the fishing and tourism industries, and damaged coastal and marine ecosystems. The bill would mandate numerous lease sales in the Gulf of mexico and off Virginia’s beaches, requiring the government to use outdated and inadequate environmental reviews in the processing of new leases, even though the reviews do not consider the impacts of a worst-case scenario like the Bp Deepwater horizon oil spill. The bill would also impose a rushed and arbitrary time period of just 30 days for the Interior Secretary to approve or deny


drilling permits, and it would grant automatic approval if no action is taken within 60 days. on may 18, the Senate rejected a motion to proceed to the consideration of S. 953 by a vote of 42-57 (Senate roll call vote 73). no iS tHe pro-environment vote.

5. regulatory rollbackS Senator olympia Snowe (r-mE) offered this amendment to S. 782, the Economic Development revitaliza-tion Act of 2011, which would have severely undermined the regulatory process. This amendment would create several unnecessary new processes to complicate economic analyses of proposed rules and to ensure interagency consultation that is already conducted by the office of management and Budget. It would also require a lengthy periodic review process for rules at select agencies, including the EpA, and impose mandatory budget cuts if reviews are not conducted or are incomplete. furthermore, this biased review process would look at rules’ costs but not their benefits—including the environmental, health, food safety and other important benefits—which numerous third party analyses have found far outweigh their costs. on June 9, the Senate—in a 53-46 vote—failed to achieve the 60-vote threshold needed to pass the Snowe amendment (Senate roll call vote 87). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The house passed several bills that would severely undermine the regulatory process and jeopardize vital public protections (including house roll call votes 880, 888, and 901); however, no such proposals have made it to the president’s desk.

6. ending etHanol SubSidieSSenators Dianne feinstein (D-CA) and Tom Coburn (r-oK) sponsored this amendment to S. 782, the Economic Development revitalization Act of 2011, to repeal wasteful incentives for the ethanol industry, including a tax subsidy for oil companies that blend ethanol into conventional gasoline and an ethanol import tariff. Conventional corn ethanol has far-reaching negative environmental impacts, including wa-ter pollution, global warming pollution, and habitat destruction, and is already mandated by the renew-able fuel Standard. on June 16, the Senate adopted the feinstein-Coburn amendment by a vote of 73-27 (Senate roll call vote 90). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote. The ethanol tax subsidy and import tariff expired at the end of 2011 and were not renewed by Congress.

7. gutting tranSportation enHancementSSenator rand paul (r-Ky) offered this amendment to h.r. 2112, the fy12 Appropriations bill for the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Justice, Transportation, and housing and Urban Development, to defund the Transportation Enhancements program. This proven program has been the largest source of federal funding for trails, walking, and biking for 20 years, and amounts to less than 2% of overall spending on surface transportation. Transportation currently accounts for more than two-thirds of our nation’s annual oil use and roughly one-third of our global warming emissions, and this small program is critical for giving people access to cleaner transportation choices. on November 1, the Senate rejected the paul amendment 38-60 (Senate roll call vote 190). no iS tHe pro-environment vote.

8. broad environmental aSSault (S. 1786)Senate finance Committee ranking member orrin hatch (r-UT) sponsored S. 1786, the Long-Term Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011, which is a sweeping and extreme assault on our govern-


ment’s ability to protect the public from a wide range of threats, ranging from pollution to workplace safety. While framed as a transportation bill, this legislation actually includes S. 299, the rEINS Act—a radical assault on our system of public protections—as well as a host of provisions undermining specific bedrock public health and environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act and the National Environ-mental policy Act. The bill would stop the EpA from cleaning up harmful pollution such as mercury, soot, smog, arsenic, lead, and carbon dioxide from some of our nation’s biggest polluters, including power plants, cement plants, and industrial boilers and incinerators. on November 2, the Senate rejected a mo-tion to proceed to the consideration of S. 1786 by a vote of 47-53 (Senate roll call vote 196). no iS tHe

pro-environment vote. The house has passed numerous pieces of legislation that are part of S. 1786, including h.r. 10—the house version of the rEINS Act—on December 7 (house roll call vote 901).

9. croSS-State air pollutionSenator rand paul (r-Ky) sponsored S.J. res. 27, a Congressional review Act resolution of disapproval to void the Cross-State Air pollution rule, which will save lives and improve public health for millions of Americans. The Cross-State rule, which was finalized in July 2011, reduces dangerous smog and soot-forming pollution that is emitted from power plants and travels across state lines, and is estimated to save up to 34,000 lives and to prevent 400,000 asthma attacks, 15,000 heart attacks, and 1.8 million missed days at school or work each year, among other health benefits. on November 10, the Senate rejected S.J. res 27 by a vote of 41-56 (Senate roll call vote 201). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The house had previously passed legislation on September 23 to block the Cross-State rule as part of the TrAIN Act (house roll call vote 741). There were no further legislative attempts to block the Cross-State rule in 2011, but the D.C. Circuit Court temporarily stayed the Cross-State rule on December 30.

10. broad environmental aSSault (S. 1720)Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member John mcCain (r-Az) sponsored S. 1720, the so-called Jobs Through Growth Act, an extreme assault on our government’s ability to protect the environ-ment and public health. While framed as a jobs bill, this legislation would prevent the EpA from cleaning up harmful pollution from some of the nation’s biggest polluters, reduce oversight for drilling, open our precious public lands to harmful tar sands development by private companies, and prohibit California from ensuring that enough water is allocated to protect salmon and Delta smelt. on November 10, the Senate rejected S. 1720 by a vote of 40-56 (Senate roll call vote 202). no iS tHe pro-environment vote.

11. undermining critical environmental programSSenate finance Committee ranking member orrin hatch (r-UT) introduced S.J. res. 10, legislation to amend the Constitution to require a balanced budget every year, and to limit spending to 18% of U.S. gross domestic product. This legislation’s draconian spending cap would undercut the federal govern-ment’s abilities to meet its core commitments, including protecting our air, water, wildlife, and lands. Independent economic analysts projected catastrophic consequences if a balanced budget amendment were already in place for fy12. on December 14, the Senate rejected this resolution by a vote of 47-53 (Senate roll call vote 229). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The house voted on a series of balanced budget amendments; however, no such proposals made it to the president’s desk.


senate votes

KEY

a= Pro-environment action✘ = Anti-environment actioni= Ineligible to vote s = Absence (counts as negative)

Cro

ss-S

tate

Air

Pollu

tion

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 178

6)

Gut

ting

Tran

spor

tatio

n En

hanc

emen

ts

Endi

ng E

than

ol S

ubsi

dies

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g

Oil

Subs

idie

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rogr

ams

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 172

0)

LCV SCORES

% % %2

011

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1!

AlAbAmA

sessions, J. (R) 9 11 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘

shelby (R) 18 17 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

AlAskA

Begich (D) 91 78 83 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a

murkowski (R) 18 22 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

ArizonA

Kyl (R) 9 6 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

mccain (R) 9 11 22 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

ArkAnsAs

Boozman (R) 9 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

pryor (D) 82 67 63 a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a

CAliforniA

Boxer (D) 100 100 90 a a a a a a a a a a a

feinstein (D) 100 100 88 a a a a a a a a a a a

ColorAdo

Bennet (D) 100 76 86 a a a a a a a a a a a

udall, m. (D) 100 83 97 a a a a a a a a a a a

ConneCtiCut

Blumenthal (D) 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a

lieberman (I) 100 83 87 a a a a a a a a a a a

delAwAre

carper (D) 100 100 85 a a a a a a a a a a a

coons (D) 100 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a

floridA

nelson, Bill (D) 100 94 66 a a a a a a a a a a a

rubio (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2. s

en

at

e s

co

re

s


senate votes

KEY


Cro

ss-S

tate

Air

Pollu

tion

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 178

6)

Gut

ting

Tran

spor

tatio

n En

hanc

emen

ts

Endi

ng E

than

ol S

ubsi

dies

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g

Oil

Subs

idie

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rogr

ams

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 172

0)

LCV SCORES

% % %2

011

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1!

GeorGiA

chambliss (R) 0 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

isakson (R) 9 11 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

HAwAii

Akaka (D) 100 94 70 a a a a a a a a a a a

inouye (D) 82 94 56 a a a a a a a a a

idAHo

crapo (R) 9 17 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

risch (R) 9 17 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

illinois

durbin (D) 91 84 84 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Kirk (R) 18 68 64 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘

indiAnA

coats (R) 0 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

lugar (R) 0 11 25 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

iowA

grassley (R) 0 0 21 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Harkin (D) 91 94 83 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

kAnsAs

moran, Jerry (R) 0 0 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

roberts (R) 0 11 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

kentuCky

mcconnell (R) 9 6 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

paul, rand (R) 18 18 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

louisiAnA

landrieu, m. (D) 82 67 49 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a a

vitter (R) 18 6 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


senate votes

KEY


Cro

ss-S

tate

Air

Pollu

tion

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 178

6)

Gut

ting

Tran

spor

tatio

n En

hanc

emen

ts

Endi

ng E

than

ol S

ubsi

dies

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g

Oil

Subs

idie

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rogr

ams

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 172

0)

LCV SCORES

% % %2

011

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1!

mAine

collins (R) 55 39 66 ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘

snowe (R) 64 44 65 ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘

mArylAnd

cardin (D) 100 100 90 a a a a a a a a a a a

mikulski (D) 100 100 84 a a a a a a a a a a a

mAssACHusetts

Brown, scott (R) 36 0 22 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘

Kerry (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a

miCHiGAn

levin, c. (D) 91 100 80 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

stabenow (D) 91 100 85 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

minnesotA

franken (D) 91 92 92 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Klobuchar (D) 82 94 91 a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

mississippi

cochran (R) 9 17 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

wicker (R) 0 11 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

missouri

Blunt (R) 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

mccaskill (D) 91 72 78 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

montAnA

Baucus, m. (D) 91 78 68 a a a a a a a a a a

tester (D) 91 83 87 a a a a ✘ a a a a a a

nebrAskA

Johanns (R) 0 6 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

nelson, Ben (D) 55 33 42 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a

2. s

en

at

e s

co

re

s


senate votes

KEY


Cro

ss-S

tate

Air

Pollu

tion

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 178

6)

Gut

ting

Tran

spor

tatio

n En

hanc

emen

ts

Endi

ng E

than

ol S

ubsi

dies

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g

Oil

Subs

idie

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rogr

ams

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 172

0)

LCV SCORES

% % %2

011

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1!

mAine

collins (R) 55 39 66 ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘

snowe (R) 64 44 65 ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘

mArylAnd

cardin (D) 100 100 90 a a a a a a a a a a a

mikulski (D) 100 100 84 a a a a a a a a a a a

mAssACHusetts

Brown, scott (R) 36 0 22 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘

Kerry (D) 100 94 91 a a a a a a a a a a a

miCHiGAn

levin, c. (D) 91 100 80 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

stabenow (D) 91 100 85 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

minnesotA

franken (D) 91 92 92 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Klobuchar (D) 82 94 91 a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a a

mississippi

cochran (R) 9 17 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

wicker (R) 0 11 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

missouri

Blunt (R) 0 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

mccaskill (D) 91 72 78 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

montAnA

Baucus, m. (D) 91 78 68 a a a a a a a a a a

tester (D) 91 83 87 a a a a ✘ a a a a a a

nebrAskA

Johanns (R) 0 6 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

nelson, Ben (D) 55 33 42 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a

nevAdA

ensign* (R) 0 6 26 ✘ ✘

Heller* (R) 11 8 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

reid, H. (D) 100 100 79 a a a a a a a a a a a

new HAmpsHire

Ayotte (R) 18 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

shaheen (D) 91 89 90 a a a a ✘ a a a a a a

new Jersey

lautenberg (D) 100 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a

menendez (D) 100 100 94 a a a a a a a a a a a

new mexiCo

Bingaman (D) 100 89 72 a a a a a a a a a a a

udall, t. (D) 100 94 96 a a a a a a a a a a a

new york

gillibrand (D) 100 100 92 a a a a a a a a a a a

schumer (D) 100 100 90 a a a a a a a a a a a

nortH CArolinA

Burr (R) 9 6 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Hagan (D) 100 78 86 a a a a a a a a a a a

nortH dAkotA

conrad (D) 91 72 58 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

Hoeven (R) 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

oHio

Brown, sherrod (D) 91 94 93 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

portman (R) 0 23 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* Senator heller was sworn in on may 9 following the resignation of Senator Ensign on may 3.


senate votes

KEY


Cro

ss-S

tate

Air

Pollu

tion

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 178

6)

Gut

ting

Tran

spor

tatio

n En

hanc

emen

ts

Endi

ng E

than

ol S

ubsi

dies

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g

Oil

Subs

idie

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rogr

ams

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 172

0)

LCV SCORES

% % %2

011

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1!

oklAHomA

coburn (R) 9 6 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

inhofe (R) 18 0 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

oreGon

merkley (D) 100 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a

wyden (D) 100 94 89 a a a a a a a a a a a

pennsylvAniA

casey (D) 91 94 96 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

toomey (R) 9 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

rHode islAnd

reed, J. (D) 100 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a

whitehouse (D) 100 100 98 a a a a a a a a a a a

soutH CArolinA

demint (R) 27 6 8 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

graham (R) 9 6 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

soutH dAkotA

Johnson, tim (D) 91 89 70 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

thune (R) 0 0 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

tennessee

Alexander, l. (R) 27 17 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘

corker (R) 9 11 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

texAs

cornyn (R) 9 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Hutchison (R) 9 11 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

utAH

Hatch (R) 9 11 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

lee, m. (R) 27 27 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2. s

en

at

e s

co

re

s


senate votes

KEY


Cro

ss-S

tate

Air

Pollu

tion

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 178

6)

Gut

ting

Tran

spor

tatio

n En

hanc

emen

ts

Endi

ng E

than

ol S

ubsi

dies

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g

Oil

Subs

idie

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Und

erm

inin

g C

ritic

al E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rogr

ams

Bro

ad E

nviro

nmen

tal A

ssau

lt (S

. 172

0)

LCV SCORES

% % %2

011

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1!

vermont

leahy (D) 91 100 92 a a a a a a a a a a

sanders (I) 100 100 95 a a a a a a a a a a a

virGiniA

warner (D) 100 94 97 a a a a a a a a a a a

webb (D) 100 83 89 a a a a a a a a a a a

wAsHinGton

cantwell (D) 100 94 89 a a a a a a a a a a a

murray (D) 100 94 89 a a a a a a a a a a a

west virGiniA

manchin (D) 64 0 58 a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a

rockefeller (D) 100 72 81 a a a a a a a a a a a

wisConsin

Johnson, r. (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Kohl (D) 91 89 84 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

wyominG

Barrasso (R) 9 11 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

enzi (R) 9 11 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


2011 House vote descriptions

1. land and water conServation Fundrepresentative Cynthia Lummis (r-Wy) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continu-ing Appropriations Act of 2011, to cut by 90% the bill’s already minimal allocation for the Land and Water Conservation fund (LWCf), which is funded by oil royalties and helps expand protected lands and fund local projects such as city parks. The LWCf has provided critical funding for some of the most cherished places in our nation, from the Grand Canyon to Gettysburg National military park to mount rainier National park. on february 16, the house rejected the Lummis amendment by a vote of 213-216 (house roll call vote 61). no iS tHe pro-environment vote.

2. Holding government accountablerepresentative Cynthia Lummis (r-Wy) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, to block implementation of the Equal Access to Justice Act, a critical statute signed into law by president ronald reagan. The law, which gives Americans the right to recov-er attorney fees if they prevail in court, has helped hold federal agencies accountable when they violate environmental, health, and safety laws. on february 17, the house adopted the Lummis amendment by a vote of 232-197 (house roll call vote 85). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. fortunately, the language in this amendment was not included in the compromise appropriations bill that funded the government through the end of fy11, h.r. 1473, which the president signed into law on April 15.

3. oFFSHore drilling SubSidieShouse Natural resources Committee ranking member Ed markey (D-mA) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, to eliminate up to $53 billion in taxpayer subsidies by closing a royalty payment loophole for oil companies operating offshore. At a time when many Americans are struggling to make ends meet, this amendment would prevent some of the world’s biggest and most profitable oil companies from drilling for free on publicly owned resources. on february 18, the house rejected the markey amendment by a vote of 174-251 (house roll call vote 109). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote.

4. oFF-road veHicleS in national ForeStSrepresentative Wally herger (r-CA) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, to halt implementation of off-road vehicle management plans in our national forests. During the George W. Bush administration, the forest Service named unmanaged off-road vehicle use as one of the four greatest threats to our forests and grasslands. on february 18, the house adopted the herger amendment by a vote of 227-197 (house roll call vote 113). no iS tHe

pro-environment vote. fortunately, the language in this amendment was not included in the com-promise appropriations bill that funded the government through the end of fy11, h.r. 1473, which the president signed into law on April 15.


5. tHe cHeSapeake bayrepresentative Bob Goodlatte (r-VA) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, to block efforts to continue the clean-up of the treasured Chesapeake Bay. It would prohibit funding to implement measures that limit the amount of allowable pollution in waters that wind up in the bay. on february 18, the house adopted the Goodlatte amendment by a vote of 230-195 (house roll call vote 120). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. fortunately, the language in this amendment was not included in the compromise appropriations bill that funded the government through the end of fy11, h.r. 1473, which the president signed into law on April 15.

6. Florida’S water Qualityrepresentative Tom rooney (r-fL) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011, to block the EpA from implementing new water quality standards to prevent toxic green slime from polluting florida’s lakes, rivers, and streams—rules that were issued in November 2010. This amendment would also halt public education about protecting waters from excess pollution from sewage and fertilizer, and set a dangerous precedent for efforts to reduce water contamination across the country, including in the mississippi river basin and the Gulf of mexi-co. on february 18, the house adopted the rooney amendment by a vote of 237-189 (house roll call vote 123). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. fortunately, the language in this amendment was not included in the compromise appropriations bill that funded the government through the end of fy11, h.r. 1473, which the president signed into law on April 15.

7. clean water SaFeguardSrepresentative David mcKinley (r-WV) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continu-ing Appropriations Act of 2011, to prevent the EpA from continuing to use its authority under the Clean Water Act to prohibit or restrict projects that would have an “unacceptable adverse effect” on water, fish, and wildlife. The EpA has reserved this authority for extraordinarily environmentally- destructive projects, using it only 13 times in the entire 39-year history of the Clean Water Act. on february 19, the house adopted the mcKinley amendment by a vote of 240-182 (house roll call vote 135). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. fortunately, the language in this amendment was not in-cluded in the compromise appropriations bill that funded the government through the end of fy11, h.r. 1473, which the president signed into law on April 15.

8. national monumentSThen-representative Dean heller (r-NV) offered this amendment to h.r. 1, the full-year Continu-ing Appropriations Act of 2011, to eliminate the president’s powers under the Antiquities Act to designate new national monuments. The Antiquities Act, signed by president Theodore roosevelt, gives presidents the authority to protect federal lands for the benefit of future generations. presidents from both parties have used the authority to designate national monuments. on february 19, the house rejected the heller amendment by a vote of 209-213 (house roll call vote 139). no iS tHe pro-

environment vote.


9. Sweeping environmental Funding and policy aSSault (H.r. 1)house Appropriations Committee Chairman hal rogers sponsored h.r. 1, the full-year Continu-ing Appropriations Act of 2011, which at the time of house passage was the greatest legislative assault ever on the environment and public health, including massive funding cuts and policy as-saults on our air, water, wildlife, and wild places. on february 19, the house passed h.r. 1 by a vote of 235-189 (house roll call vote 147). on march 9, the Senate rejected h.r. 1 (Senate roll call vote 36). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The obama administration and Senate leadership sub-sequently stood strong in negotiations with the house and insisted that most—but not all—of the anti- environmental riders from h.r. 1 be dropped before agreeing to the final compromise bill, h.r. 1473, which the president signed into law on April 15.

10. peSticideS pollutionrepresentative Bob Gibbs (r-oh) sponsored h.r. 872, the so-called reducing regulatory Burdens Act of 2011, to prevent the EpA from protecting our waterways from the discharge of toxic pesticides that can contaminate drinking water, severely harm fish, and work their way up the food chain. more than 1,000 U.S. waterways are already impaired by pesticides. This legislation would remove the EpA’s tools under the Clean Water Act to control this pollution, instead relying on a weak federal pesticides law that demonstrably fails to protect our waters now. on march 31, the house passed a motion to suspend the rules and pass h.r. 872 by a vote of 292-130 (house roll call vote 206). no iS tHe pro-

environment vote. h.r. 872 was reported out of the Senate Agriculture Committee on June 21, but the full Senate has taken no action on this legislation.

11. global warming pollutionhouse Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman fred Upton (r-mI) crafted h.r. 910, the so-called Energy Tax prevention Act of 2011, to legislatively repeal a scientific finding by the EpA that greenhouse gases endanger human health and the environment, to permanently block the EpA from regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, and to undermine fuel economy standards. This harmful bill would jeopardize public health and the environment and increase the nation’s dan-gerous dependence on oil. on April 7, the house passed h.r. 910 by a vote of 255-172 (house roll call vote 249). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. Just one day earlier, on April 6, the Senate rejected four amendments to weaken, delay, or block the EpA’s ability to reduce greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, including the mcConnell amendment (Senate roll call vote 54) that was identical to h.r. 910. At the end of 2011, the EpA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act remained firmly intact.

12. oFFSHore drilling SaFety reFormShouse Natural resources Committee ranking member Ed markey (D-mA) offered this amendment to h.r. 1229, the so-called putting the Gulf of mexico Back to Work Act, to implement basic off-shore drilling safety reforms recommended by the independent commission tasked with investigating the causes of the 2010 Bp Deepwater horizon oil spill and recommending oversight reforms. The amendment would result in common-sense reforms that still have not been codified into law following


the greatest environmental disaster in our nation’s history. on may 10, the house rejected the markey amendment by a vote of 176-237 (house roll call vote 301). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote.

13. weakening oFFSHore drilling overSigHthouse Natural resources Committee Chairman Doc hastings (r-WA) sponsored h.r. 1229, the so-called putting the Gulf of mexico Back to Work Act, which would expand offshore drilling and make it more dangerous by enacting oversight standards that are weaker than those that were in place before the catastrophic 2010 Gulf oil spill disaster, which tragically killed 11 workers, wreaked havoc on the Gulf Coast’s fishing and tourism industries, and damaged coastal and marine ecosystems. The legislation would impose a rushed and arbitrary time period of just 30 days for the Interior Secre-tary to approve or deny drilling permits, and it would grant automatic approval if no action is taken within 60 days. on may 11, the house passed h.r. 1229 by a vote of 263-163 (house roll call vote 309). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. While the Senate has taken no formal action on h.r. 1229, much of the bill’s language was included in S. 953, the so-called offshore production and Safety Act of 2011, which the Senate rejected on a procedural vote on may 18 (Senate roll call vote 73).

14. oFFSHore drilling expanSionhouse Natural resources Committee Chairman Doc hastings (r-WA) sponsored h.r. 1231, the reversing president obama’s offshore moratorium Act, a radical piece of legislation that would throw open most of America’s coastline to dangerous offshore drilling. It would ensure that drilling occurs off the beaches of the entire East Coast down to North Carolina, off the Southern California coast, and in the Arctic ocean and Alaska’s salmon-rich Bristol Bay—regardless of whether a state objects to such drilling. on may 12, the house passed h.r. 1231 by a vote of 243-179 (house roll call vote 320). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The Senate has taken no action on this legislation.

15. border Fence environmental mitigationrepresentative Cynthia Lummis (r-Wy) offered this amendment to h.r. 2017, the fy12 Depart-ment of homeland Security (DhS) Appropriations bill, to remove a critical provision that would have allowed the transfer of funds from the DhS to the Department of the Interior to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts associated with border security projects. These projects include the construction of a border fence, which slices through national monuments, wildlife refuges, and other critical public lands, and threatens numerous imperiled species—such as jaguars, ocelots, bighorn sheep, and Sonoran pronghorn—by fragmenting their natural habitat. on June 2, the house adopted the Lummis amendment by a vote of 238-177 (house roll call vote 391). no iS tHe pro-environment

vote. regrettably, the language authorizing the transfer of funds was not included in the compromise fy12 omnibus appropriations bill, h.r. 2055, which the president signed into law on December 23.

16. climate cHange adaptationrepresentative Steve Scalise (r-LA) offered this amendment to h.r. 2112, the fy12 Agriculture Appropriations bill, to bar the Department of Agriculture from implementing its climate change adaptation plan. our nation’s food sources and forests are threatened by the increased severity and


variability of climate and weather-related events. The Agriculture Department is working with farm-ers, the agriculture industry, and forest managers to prepare for these threats and to develop better farming and forestry practices to help reduce the negative impacts of climate change. on June 16, the house adopted the Scalise amendment by a vote of 238-179 (house roll call vote 448). no iS tHe pro-

environment vote. fortunately, the language in this amendment was not included in the compro-mise appropriations bill that funded the Department of Agriculture and several other departments through the end of fy12, h.r. 2112, which the president signed into law on November 18.

17. oFFSHore drilling air pollutionrepresentative Cory Gardner (r-Co) sponsored h.r. 2021, the so-called Jobs and Energy permit-ting Act of 2011, which would allow oil companies to sidestep critical Clean Air Act protections and avoid common-sense air pollution limits on their offshore drilling operations. The bill would exempt these companies from requirements to apply available pollution control technology to vessels involved in offshore drilling, and waive permit reviews by the EpA’s Environmental Appeals Board. on June 22, the house passed h.r. 2021 by a vote of 253-166 (house roll call vote 478). no iS tHe

pro-environment vote. Unfortunately, language with a similar goal of giving oil companies a free pass to pollute was included in the compromise fy12 omnibus appropriations bill, h.r. 2055, which the president signed into law on December 23. This language moves responsibility for Arctic offshore drilling air pollution permitting from the EpA to the Department of the Interior—in effect, exempt-ing the industry from the Clean Air Act’s health-based national ambient air quality standards and the Act’s program to prevent significant deterioration of air quality.

18. clean water protectionSrepresentative James moran (D-VA) offered this amendment to h.r. 2354, the fy12 Energy and Water Appropriations bill, to strike a provision in the underlying bill prohibiting the EpA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from restoring longstanding Clean Water Act protections for small streams, headwaters, and wetlands that Americans depend on for swimming, fishing, and drinking, as well as for protection against flooding. on July 12, the house rejected the moran amendment by a vote of 170-250 (house roll call vote 540). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote. While the moran amendment was defeated, the anti-environmental provision it sought to strike was fortunately not in-cluded in the compromise fy12 omnibus appropriations bill, h.r. 2055, which the president signed into law on December 23.

19. Flood inSurance reFormrepresentative Judy Biggert (r-IL) sponsored h.r. 1309, the flood Insurance reform Act of 2011, which would take a much-needed step toward reforming the National flood Insurance program (NfIp) and protecting sensitive environmental habitats. While the existing NfIp provides flood in-surance at a significantly discounted rate—thereby creating a market incentive that has encouraged development and destruction of floodplains—h.r. 1309 would remedy this by increasing current rates to market-based levels. The bill would also create a $90 million per year mitigation fund to help relocate communities out of floodplains, and create a Technical mapping Advisory Council that


would, among other things, ensure that changing weather and altered hydrology are included in the assessment of risk. on July 12, the house passed h.r. 1309 by a vote of 406-22 (house roll call vote 562). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote. The Senate Banking committee unanimously reported a companion bill, S. 1940, on December 15, which is currently awaiting consideration by the full Senate.

20. ligHt bulb energy eFFiciency StandardSrepresentative Joe Barton (r-TX) introduced h.r. 2417, the deceptively titled Better Use of Light Bulbs Act, which would eliminate common-sense energy efficiency standards for light bulbs. These standards passed with strong bipartisan and industry support and were signed into law by president George W. Bush in 2007. h.r. 2417 would roll back the financial and public health benefits of these standards, which will provide billions of dollars in savings for American families and energy savings equivalent to the energy provided by 30 large power plants, reducing harmful pollution. on July 12, a house vote to suspend the rules and pass the bill with a two-thirds majority failed on a 233-193 vote (house roll call vote 563). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. Unfortunately, language that pro-hibits the Department of Energy from using funding to implement or enforce the light bulb energy efficiency standards was included in the compromise fy12 omnibus appropriations bill, h.r. 2055, which the president signed into law on December 23.

21. dirty water acthouse Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman John mica (r-fL) sponsored h.r. 2018, the misnamed Clean Water Cooperative federalism Act of 2011, which is a blatant assault on the Clean Water Act and on waterways Americans depend on for swimming, fishing, and drinking. Despite overwhelming public support for clean water, the bill would cripple the EpA’s ability to set a minimum “floor” for a state’s water quality standards, blocking the agency’s ability to limit pol-lution flowing downstream to other waters and also into other states. further, the bill would allow the destruction of critical water habitat and gut the Clean Water Act provisions that protect streams, wetlands, and other bodies of water from harmful large-scale mining and other destructive projects. on July 13, the house passed h.r. 2018 by a vote of 239-184 (house roll call vote 573). no iS tHe

pro-environment vote. The Senate has taken no action on this legislation.

22. gulF coaSt reStorationrepresentative Steve Scalise (r-LA) offered this amendment to h.r. 2354, the fy12 Energy and Water Appropriations bill, to boost funding by $1 million for coastal Louisiana restoration projects by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The amendment would allow for the start of new projects to help restore the wetlands, fish, and wildlife of the Gulf Coast region, which have been degraded over the years by agricultural run-off, hurricanes, and disasters like the 2010 Bp Deepwater horizon oil spill. on July 15, the house adopted the Scalise amendment by a vote of 271-148 (house roll call vote 590). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote. Unfortunately, the language in the Scalise amendment was not included in the compromise fy12 omnibus appropriations bill, h.r. 2055, which the president signed into law on December 23.


23. energy eFFiciency and renewable energyrepresentative paul Broun (r-GA) offered this amendment to h.r. 2354, the fy12 Energy and Wa-ter Appropriations bill, to eliminate funding for the Department of Energy’s energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. Investing in these technologies creates jobs, saves consumers money on their energy bills, and reduces harmful pollution associated with dirty energy production. on July 15, the house rejected the Broun amendment by a vote of 69-354 (house roll call vote 591). no iS tHe

pro-environment vote.

24. environmental Fundingrepresentative Tim huelskamp (r-KS) offered this amendment to h.r. 2584, the fy12 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill, to cut spending in the bill by over $3 billion, a more than 10% cut from the underlying bill, which already represents a major spending reduction from the previous year’s bill. The amendment would drastically slash spending from a slew of critical conservation agencies such as the fish and Wildlife Service and the National park Service, as well as from envi-ronmental programs such as the Clean Water State revolving funds and the Drinking Water State revolving funds. on July 25, the house rejected the huelskamp amendment by a vote of 126-284 (house roll call vote 633). no iS tHe pro-environment vote.

25. keyStone xl tar SandS pipelinerepresentative Lee Terry (r-NE) sponsored h.r. 1938, the misnamed North American-made Ener-gy Security Act, to rush a decision on whether to grant a presidential permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline across six states in order to carry tar sands—the dirtiest oil on the planet—from Canada’s boreal forest to an international shipping port in Texas. This pipeline would threaten the environ-ment with far more global warming pollution than conventional crude oil and jeopardize surround-ing communities, ecosystems, and watersheds. on July 26, the house passed h.r. 1938 by a vote of 279-147 (house roll call vote 650). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. on November 10, the obama administration announced that it intended to conduct additional review and would not make a final decision on the permit until the first quarter of 2013. republican leaders in Congress subsequently insisted on including language to force a decision within 60 days in h.r. 3765, the Temporary payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, which the president signed into law on December 23. The obama administration rejected the permit on January 18, 2012.

26. endangered SpecieS acthouse Appropriations Committee ranking member Norm Dicks (D-WA) and representative mike fitzpatrick (r-pA) offered this amendment to h.r. 2584, the fy12 Interior and Environment Ap-propriations bill, to strike a rider in the underlying bill prohibiting the fish and Wildlife Service from spending any money to list new plants and animals under the Endangered Species Act, designate critical habitat, or upgrade species from threatened to endangered. This Extinction rider—a direct assault on the Endangered Species Act, which has prevented the extinction of listed species such as the American alligator and the grizzly bear—would boost the risk of extinction for hundreds of im-periled plants and animals, and it would immediately block life-saving protections for more than 260


“candidate species” that are currently awaiting listing decisions, such as the wolverine, rio Grande cutthroat trout, and pacific walrus. on July 27, the house adopted the Dicks-fitzpatrick amendment by a vote of 224-202 (house roll call vote 652). yeS iS tHe pro-environment vote.

27. gutting public HealtH baSiS oF tHe clean air actrepresentative Bob Latta (r-oh) offered this amendment to h.r. 2401, the deceptively titled Transpar-ency in regulatory Analysis of Impacts on the Nation Act of 2011(TrAIN Act), to eliminate a central underpinning of the Clean Air Act—affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2001—that clean air stan-dards must be based on what public health science tells us is safe to breathe. This amendment would re-quire the EpA to define healthy air based on the “feasibility and cost” to polluting industries, and would compel the EpA to accept standards that fail to protect public health. on September 23, the house ad-opted the Latta amendment by a vote of 227-192 (house roll call vote 738). no iS tHe pro-environment

vote. The Senate has taken no action on legislation containing language from the Latta amendment.

28. aSSault on tHe clean air actrepresentative John Sullivan (r-oK) introduced h.r. 2401, the deceptively titled Transparency in regulatory Analysis of Impacts on the Nation Act of 2011(TrAIN Act), requiring duplicative, bi-ased, and unnecessary analyses of the costs—but not the benefits—of several EpA public health safe-guards. moreover, through last minute amendments adopted in committee and on the house floor, h.r. 2401 grew into the single biggest assault on the Clean Air Act in its more than 40-year history. This bill would allow for the indefinite delay of two life-saving clean air safeguards (the Cross-State Air pollution rule and the mercury and Air Toxics Standards for power plants), meaning tens of thousands of lives would be lost and hundreds of thousands more asthma attacks would occur from increased air pollution. The bill would also require any future standards to be based on the most pol-luting power plants and incorporate the Latta amendment (house roll call vote 738) to eliminate the health-based underpinning of the Clean Air Act. on September 23, the house passed h.r. 2401 by a vote of 249-169 (house roll call vote 741). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The Senate has not acted on companion legislation, but on November 10, it rejected a Congressional review Act resolu-tion of disapproval that would have voided the Cross-State Air pollution rule, which is one of the two rules targeted by h.r. 2401 (Senate roll call vote 201).

29. toxic air pollution From cement plantSrepresentative John Sullivan (r-oK) sponsored h.r. 2681, the so-called Cement Sector regulatory relief Act of 2011, which would toss out already-finalized standards to clean up mercury and other toxic air pollution from cement plants, the second largest industrial emitters of mercury pollution, which can impair a child’s ability to think, talk, read, write, and learn. The bill would delay a new set of standards for at least four and a half years while eliminating any deadline by which cement plants are required to comply with the standards. Every year the standards are delayed would mean an ad-ditional 2,500 premature deaths due to cement plants’ harmful emissions. on october 6, the house passed h.r. 2681 by a vote of 262-161 (house roll call vote 764). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The Senate has taken no action on this legislation.


30. toxic air pollution From boilerSrepresentative morgan Griffith (r-VA) sponsored h.r. 2250, the so-called EpA regulatory relief Act of 2011, which would indefinitely delay long-overdue air pollution control standards for industri-al boilers and incinerators, which act as small, in-house power plants and emit toxic air pollution in-cluding mercury—a potent neurotoxin especially dangerous to pregnant women and children—and cancer-causing dioxins. These facilities are the nation’s third largest source of mercury emissions. Ev-ery year these standards are delayed would mean up to an additional 8,100 premature deaths, 52,000 asthma attacks, and 5,100 heart attacks. on october 13, the house passed h.r. 2250 by a vote of 275-142 (house roll call vote 791). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. The Senate has taken no action on h.r. 2250, though numerous Senate bills have been introduced containing language attacking toxic air pollution standards for industrial boilers, including S. 1786, which the Senate rejected on November 3 (Senate roll call vote 196).

31. coal aSH pollutionrepresentative David mcKinley (r-WV) sponsored h.r. 2273, the Coal residuals reuse and man-agement Act, which would fail to protect the health of communities from the dangers of coal ash pol-lution. Coal ash, the toxic byproduct of burning coal that’s laden with arsenic, lead, and other heavy metals, is stored across the country in nearly 700 largely unregulated sludge impoundments. It can be catastrophic when these sludge impoundments fail—such as when more than one billion gallons of ash spilled across 300 acres after a Tennessee dam failed in 2008—and dangerous chemicals can leach from them into water Americans count on. yet this bill would afford communities fewer protections from these toxic sludge ponds than they currently receive from their local household garbage landfill. on october 14, the house passed h.r. 2273 by a vote of 267-144 (house roll call vote 800). no iS tHe

pro-environment vote. The Senate has taken no action on this legislation.

32. Hard rock miningrepresentative paul Gosar (r-Az) introduced h.r. 1904, the deceptively titled Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act, which would transfer lands within the Tonto National forest to a mining corporation in exchange for the government receiving lower-quality private lands owned by the corporation. The legislation would allow the land exchange to occur without proper environ-mental review for the large-scale mining operations planned for the area, which is considered a sacred site by Native American tribes and is renowned for its natural beauty. on october 26, the house adopted h.r. 1904 by a vote of 235-186 (house roll call vote 809). no iS tHe pro-environment vote.

The Senate has taken no action on this legislation.

33. controlling aQuatic invaSive SpecieShouse rules Committee ranking member Louise Slaughter (D-Ny) introduced this amendment to h.r. 2838, the Coast Guard and maritime Transportation Act of 2011, to strike a section of the bill that would eliminate the tools used by federal and state officials to limit the introduction of aquatic invasive species from ballast water, which is carried by vessels to add weight and provide stability.


Aquatic invasive species are found in states across the country, but they can be particularly problem-atic in the freshwater Great Lakes, where ballast water discharges are responsible for the introduction of more than 30% of the more than 185 invasive species that are currently disrupting the food chain, fouling beaches, and harming infrastructure in the region. on November 4, the house rejected the Slaughter amendment by a vote of 161-237 (house roll call vote 836). yeS iS tHe pro-environment

vote. The house passed h.r. 2838 with the harmful ballast water provisions, while the Senate Com-merce Committee on November 2 reported its own Coast Guard authorization bill, S. 1665, which does not include the harmful ballast water provisions. The full Senate has not yet taken action on S. 1655.

34. regulatory rollbackS (H.r. 3010)house Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (r-TX) sponsored h.r. 3010, the regulatory Accountability Act, sweeping legislation that would cripple the rulemaking process by further em-powering special interests to effectively stop federal agencies from moving forward with setting basic minimum protections, such as those for Americans’ health and safety. It would override the imple-mentation of existing laws such as the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the occupational Safety & health Act. The bill would add more than 60 additional analyses to an already lengthy and complicated rulemaking process and expands judicial review, thus inviting increased litigation. on December 2, the house passed h.r. 3010 by a vote of 253-167 (house roll call vote 888). no iS tHe

pro-environment vote. The Senate has not acted on identical companion legislation; however, on three separate occasions, the Senate rejected proposals that would severely undermine the regulatory process (Senate roll call votes 87, 196, and 202).

35. regulatory rollbackS (H.r. 10)representative Geoff Davis (r-Ky) introduced h.r. 10, the misnamed regulations from the Ex-ecutive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011 (rEINS Act), to require that all major rules receive a joint resolution of approval by Congress, without change, within 70 legislative days. This unnecessary and radical legislation would effectively allow just one chamber of Congress to block enforcement of existing statutory protections ranging from clean air to worker safety. That is a recipe for preventing any new safeguards from being implemented, no matter how necessary they are to protect Americans from emerging threats to their health and safety. on December 7, the house passed h.r. 10 by a vote of 241-184 (house roll call vote 901). no iS tHe pro-environment vote. While the Senate has taken no formal action on h.r. 10, the upper chamber twice rejected this proposal when it was included in larger bills (Senate roll call votes 196 and 202).

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

AlAbAmA1 Bonner (R) 9 8 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 roby (R) 11 11 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 rogers, mike d. (R) 9 13 12 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Aderholt (R) 11 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Brooks (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Bachus, s. (R) 11 8 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 sewell (D) 80 80 a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ aAlAskAAL young, d. (R) 11 17 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ArizonA1 gosar (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 franks, t. (R) 3 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Quayle (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 pastor (D) 94 100 84 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 schweikert (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 flake (R) 9 0 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 grijalva (D) 100 92 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 giffords (D) N/a 92 89 aBSENtFORaLLVOtESDuEtOHERONGOINGRECOVERY.

ArkAnsAs1 crawford (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 griffin (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 womack (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 ross, m. (D) 31 71 48 a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

CAliforniA1 thompson, m. (D) 91 96 90 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a2 Herger (R) 3 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 lungren (R) 9 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 mcclintock (R) 6 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 matsui (D) 97 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aaBSENtFORaLLVOtESDuEtOHERONGOINGRECOVERY.

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a

a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

6 woolsey (D) 100 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 miller, george (D) 97 92 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 pelosi (D) 89 n/a 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 lee, B. (D) 100 96 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 garamendi (D) 97 92 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a11 mcnerney (D) 94 96 91 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a12 speier (D) 91 92 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 stark (D) 86 75 88 a a a a a a a a a a a14 eshoo (D) 94 96 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 Honda (D) 100 100 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a16 lofgren (D) 94 88 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a17 farr (D) 97 100 95 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a18 cardoza (D) 40 92 65 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a19 denham (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

20 costa (D) 31 75 57 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

21 nunes (R) 9 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 mccarthy, K. (R) 9 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

23 capps (D) 94 100 95 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a24 gallegly (R) 6 4 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

25 mcKeon (R) 11 8 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 dreier (R) 9 8 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

27 sherman (D) 97 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a28 Berman (D) 97 96 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a29 schiff (D) 97 100 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a30 waxman (D) 97 96 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a31 Becerra (D) 97 100 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a32 chu (D) 100 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a33 Bass, K. (D) 94 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a34 roybal-Allard (D) 100 96 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

35 waters (D) 91 92 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a36 Hahn* (D) 100 100

36 Harman* (D) 11 92 80 ✘ a

37 richardson (D) 91 96 92 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a38 napolitano (D) 100 96 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a39 sánchez, linda (D) 89 79 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a40 royce (R) 6 4 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

41 lewis, Jerry (R) 11 4 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

42 miller, gary (R) 6 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

43 Baca (D) 74 92 72 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a44 calvert (R) 9 8 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

45 Bono mack (R) 11 38 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

46 rohrabacher (R) 3 4 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

47 sanchez, loretta (D) 83 100 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a48 campbell (R) 11 0 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

49 issa (R) 9 4 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

50 Bilbray (R) 17 25 42 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

51 filner (D) 91 96 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a52 Hunter (R) 6 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

53 davis, s. (D) 97 96 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a aColorAdo

1 degette (D) 100 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 polis (D) 83 100 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 tipton (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 gardner (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 lamborn (R) 9 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 coffman (R) 6 4 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 perlmutter (D) 74 83 82 a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a

* representative hahn was sworn in on July 19 following the resignation of representative harman on february 28.

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

ConneCtiCut1 larson, J. (D) 97 100 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 courtney (D) 97 100 98 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a3 delauro (D) 97 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Himes (D) 97 92 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 murphy, c. (D) 97 96 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

delAwAreAL carney (D) 94 94 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a

floridA1 miller, J. (R) 6 4 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 southerland (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Brown, c. (D) 91 96 86 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a4 crenshaw (R) 11 29 11 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 nugent (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 stearns (R) 11 0 16 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 mica (R) 11 8 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 webster (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 Bilirakis (R) 17 21 21 ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 young, c.w. (R) 23 21 29 a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

11 castor (D) 97 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a12 ross, d. (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 Buchanan (R) 20 29 29 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a14 mack (R) 6 13 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a15 posey (R) 6 13 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 rooney (R) 11 17 14 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 wilson, f. (D) 80 80 a a a a a a a a a a a18 ros-lehtinen (R) 20 54 41 ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a19 deutch (D) 89 86 88 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a20 wasserman schultz (D) 100 92 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a21 diaz-Balart (R) 11 38 18 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

22 west, A. (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

23 Hastings, A. (D) 94 83 83 a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a24 Adams (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

25 rivera (R) 14 14 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

GeorGiA1 Kingston (R) 9 0 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Bishop, s. (D) 54 92 50 a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 westmoreland, l. (R) 9 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Johnson, H. (D) 94 96 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 lewis, John (D) 100 88 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 price, t. (R) 9 0 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 woodall (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 scott, A. (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 graves, t. (R) 0 0 0 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 Broun (R) 3 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 gingrey (R) 9 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 Barrow (D) 46 83 62 ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 scott, d. (D) 86 96 76 a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a aHAwAii

1 Hanabusa (D) 97 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Hirono (D) 97 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

idAHo1 labrador (R) 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 simpson (R) 14 17 8 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

illinois1 rush (D) 94 92 79 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Jackson, J. (D) 97 92 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 lipinski (D) 91 92 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 gutierrez (D) 94 88 90 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a5 Quigley (D) 94 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

6 roskam (R) 9 17 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 davis, d. (D) 91 96 93 a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a8 walsh (R) 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 schakowsky (D) 97 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 dold (R) 34 34 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Kinzinger (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 costello (D) 57 75 65 a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a a13 Biggert (R) 17 38 30 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 Hultgren (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Johnson, timothy (R) 34 58 59 a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 manzullo (R) 11 4 9 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 schilling (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 schock (R) 11 21 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

19 shimkus (R) 11 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

indiAnA1 visclosky (D) 89 92 75 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 donnelly (D) 43 75 62 a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 stutzman (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 rokita (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Burton (R) 6 0 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 pence (R) 6 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 carson (D) 86 100 91 a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a a a8 Bucshon (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 young, t. (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

iowA1 Braley (D) 86 100 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 loebsack (D) 94 96 93 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a3 Boswell (D) 66 88 63 a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

4 latham (R) 11 13 9 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 King, s. (R) 9 4 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a aa a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

kAnsAs1 Huelskamp (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Jenkins (R) 6 4 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 yoder (R) 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 pompeo (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

kentuCky1 whitfield (R) 17 29 16 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 guthrie (R) 17 4 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 yarmuth (D) 91 96 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 davis, g. (R) 9 4 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 rogers, H. (R) 9 13 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 chandler (D) 66 96 87 a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ alouisiAnA

1 scalise (R) 9 8 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 richmond (D) 86 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 landry, J. (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 fleming (R) 6 8 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Alexander, r. (R) 11 17 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 cassidy (R) 11 29 19 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Boustany (R) 11 13 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

mAine1 pingree (D) 91 100 95 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a2 michaud (D) 91 100 93 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a

mArylAnd1 Harris (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 ruppersberger (D) 89 83 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 sarbanes (D) 97 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 edwards (D) 97 96 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 Hoyer (D) 97 92 79 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

6 Bartlett (R) 9 13 19 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 cummings (D) 97 100 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 van Hollen (D) 100 100 99 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

mAssACHusetts1 olver (D) 89 100 97 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a2 neal (D) 91 96 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 mcgovern (D) 97 100 100 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a4 frank, B. (D) 94 92 92 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a5 tsongas (D) 91 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 tierney (D) 97 96 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 markey (D) 97 100 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 capuano (D) 97 96 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 lynch (D) 91 96 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 Keating (D) 97 97 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a

miCHiGAn1 Benishek (R) 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Huizenga (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Amash (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 camp (R) 11 13 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Kildee (D) 94 100 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 upton (R) 17 21 36 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 walberg (R) 6 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 rogers, mike (R) 14 21 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 peters (D) 74 100 85 ✘ a ✘ a a a a10 miller, c. (R) 17 29 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 mccotter (R) 11 25 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 levin, s. (D) 97 100 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 clarke, H. (D) 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 conyers (D) 97 96 78 a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 dingell (D) 89 92 74 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a a a a a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

minnesotA1 walz (D) 83 92 85 a a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘

2 Kline, J. (R) 9 8 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 paulsen (R) 29 29 29 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

4 mccollum (D) 74 100 93 a a a a a a a5 ellison (D) 91 92 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 Bachmann (R) 6 4 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 peterson (D) 20 79 43 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 cravaack (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

mississippi1 nunnelee (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 thompson, B. (D) 86 100 77 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a3 Harper (R) 6 4 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 palazzo (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

missouri1 clay (D) 97 92 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Akin (R) 9 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 carnahan (D) 94 96 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 Hartzler (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 cleaver (D) 100 96 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 graves, s. (R) 9 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 long (R) 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 emerson (R) 11 8 8 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 luetkemeyer (R) 6 4 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

montAnAAL rehberg (R) 9 8 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

nebrAskA1 fortenberry (R) 29 33 30 a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 terry (R) 11 13 9 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 smith, Adrian (R) 6 8 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

nevAdA1 Berkley (D) 94 92 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 Amodei* (R) 0 0

2 Heller* (R) 0 8 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Heck (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

new HAmpsHire1 guinta (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Bass, c. (R) 46 45 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

new Jersey1 Andrews (D) 94 100 91 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 loBiondo (R) 54 63 71 a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a3 runyan (R) 20 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a4 smith, c. (R) 60 67 72 a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a5 garrett (R) 9 0 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 pallone (D) 97 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 lance (R) 34 58 44 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a8 pascrell (D) 94 96 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 rothman (D) 97 96 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a10 payne (D) 94 100 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a11 frelinghuysen (R) 23 21 48 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a12 Holt (D) 100 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 sires (D) 89 88 89 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a

new mexiCo1 Heinrich (D) 91 100 95 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a2 pearce (R) 6 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 luján (D) 97 96 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a anew york

1 Bishop, t. (D) 100 100 99 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 israel (D) 100 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 King, p. (R) 14 25 19 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* representative Amodei was sworn in on September 15 following the appointment of representative heller to the U.S. Senate on may 9.

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘


a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

4 mccarthy, c. (D) 86 96 92 a a a a a a ✘ a a a a5 Ackerman (D) 94 83 88 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a6 meeks, g. (D) 97 100 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 crowley (D) 94 100 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 nadler (D) 97 100 96 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 turner, B.* (R) 0 0

9 weiner* (D) 88 88 93 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a10 towns (D) 97 96 80 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a11 clarke, y. (D) 100 100 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a12 velázquez (D) 97 96 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a13 grimm (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 maloney (D) 97 96 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 rangel (D) 94 100 82 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a16 serrano (D) 100 100 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a17 engel (D) 94 96 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 lowey (D) 97 100 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a19 Hayworth (R) 43 43 ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

20 gibson, c. (R) 17 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

21 tonko (D) 97 100 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a22 Hinchey (D) 69 100 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a23 owens (D) 63 67 64 ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ a24 Hanna (R) 29 29 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

25 Buerkle (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

26 Hochul** (D) 90 90

27 Higgins (D) 91 96 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a28 slaughter (D) 89 100 93 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a29 reed, t. (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* representative Turner was sworn in on September 15 following the resignation of representative Weiner on June 21.** representative hochul was sworn in on June 1 following the resignation of representative Lee on february 9.

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a

a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ aa a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a a aa a a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

nortH CArolinA1 Butterfield (D) 94 96 88 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a2 ellmers (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Jones (R) 34 33 24 ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a4 price, d. (D) 94 100 87 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a5 foxx (R) 3 0 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 coble (R) 11 0 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 mcintyre (D) 54 83 59 a a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

8 Kissell (D) 66 88 75 a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a9 myrick (R) 9 0 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 mcHenry (R) 6 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 shuler (D) 71 88 76 a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a12 watt (D) 97 100 92 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a13 miller, B. (D) 97 100 95 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a

nortH dAkotAAL Berg (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

oHio1 chabot (R) 6 19 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 schmidt (R) 11 13 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 turner, m. (R) 11 29 12 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Jordan (R) 6 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 latta (R) 9 0 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Johnson, B. (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Austria (R) 11 4 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Boehner (R) N/a 0 2 tHESPEaKEROFtHEHOuSEVOtESatHISDISCREtION.

9 Kaptur (D) 89 88 78 a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a10 Kucinich (D) 94 88 91 a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a11 fudge (D) 97 96 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a12 tiberi (R) 11 25 14 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 sutton (D) 91 100 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

tHESPEaKEROFtHEHOuSEVOtESatHISDISCREtION.

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

14 latourette (R) 23 42 27 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 stivers (R) 14 14 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

16 renacci (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 ryan, t. (D) 97 100 86 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a18 gibbs, B. (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

oklAHomA1 sullivan (R) 9 0 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Boren (D) 23 58 32 a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 lucas (R) 9 13 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 cole (R) 9 17 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 lankford (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

oreGon1 wu* (D) 96 100 95 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a2 walden (R) 14 29 13 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Blumenauer (D) 94 100 94 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 defazio (D) 89 83 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 schrader (D) 71 88 78 a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a

pennsylvAniA1 Brady, r. (D) 94 100 81 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 fattah (D) 94 100 89 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Kelly (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Altmire (D) 40 79 64 a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 thompson, g. (R) 11 4 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 gerlach (R) 34 38 50 a a ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 meehan (R) 17 17 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 fitzpatrick (R) 46 58 a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

9 shuster (R) 9 4 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 marino (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 Barletta (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 critz (D) 43 67 46 a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

* representative Wu resigned on August 3.

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a aa a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a

a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

13 schwartz (D) 94 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a14 doyle (D) 91 92 69 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a15 dent (R) 23 38 30 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

16 pitts (R) 9 4 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

17 Holden (D) 43 79 57 a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 murphy, t. (R) 11 21 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

19 platts (R) 29 29 34 a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

rHode islAnd1 cicilline (D) 100 100 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 langevin (D) 91 100 97 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a

soutH CArolinA1 scott, t. (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 wilson, J. (R) 6 4 4 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 duncan, Jeff (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 gowdy (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 mulvaney (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 clyburn (D) 91 96 84 a a a a a a a a a a a a a asoutH dAkotAAL noem (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

tennessee1 roe (R) 9 4 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 duncan, John (R) 6 4 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 fleischmann (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 desJarlais (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 cooper (D) 89 92 78 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a6 Black, d. (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 Blackburn, m. (R) 9 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 fincher (R) 9 9 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 cohen (D) 91 96 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

texAs1 gohmert (R) 3 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 poe (R) 6 4 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 Johnson, s. (R) 6 0 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Hall, r. (R) 6 4 13 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Hensarling (R) 6 0 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 Barton (R) 11 4 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 culberson (R) 6 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 Brady, K. (R) 6 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

9 green, A. (D) 80 100 80 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘

10 mccaul (R) 9 13 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 conaway (R) 3 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

12 granger (R) 11 8 6 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

13 thornberry (R) 6 0 2 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

14 paul, ron (R) 6 0 24 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

15 Hinojosa (D) 66 79 62 a a a a ✘ a16 reyes (D) 80 83 64 a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘

17 flores (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

18 Jackson lee (D) 80 92 81 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘

19 neugebauer (R) 3 0 1 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

20 gonzalez (D) 77 92 80 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a21 smith, l. (R) 9 8 7 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

22 olson (R) 9 0 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

23 canseco (R) 3 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

24 marchant (R) 6 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

25 doggett (D) 97 100 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a26 Burgess (R) 6 0 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

27 farenthold (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

28 cuellar (D) 51 88 57 a a ✘ a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

29 green, g. (D) 69 83 65 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘

30 Johnson, e. (D) 89 96 81 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘

a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ a a a ✘ a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ aa ✘ ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

31 carter (R) 9 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

32 sessions, p. (R) 6 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

utAH1 Bishop, r. (R) 6 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 matheson (D) 37 75 58 a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 chaffetz (R) 3 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

vermontAL welch (D) 97 96 96 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a

virGiniA1 wittman (R) 34 29 31 a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 rigell (R) 17 17 a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 scott, r. (D) 100 96 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a4 forbes (R) 14 4 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 Hurt (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 goodlatte (R) 11 8 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 cantor (R) 11 0 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 moran, James (D) 100 96 87 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a9 griffith (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

10 wolf (R) 40 17 29 ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

11 connolly (D) 100 96 98 a a a a a a a a a a a a a awAsHinGton

1 inslee (D) 100 100 92 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a2 larsen, r. (D) 91 100 89 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a3 Herrera Beutler (R) 14 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

4 Hastings, d. (R) 9 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

5 mcmorris rodgers (R) 6 4 3 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 dicks (D) 97 100 71 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a7 mcdermott (D) 94 96 90 a a a a a a a a a a a a a8 reichert (R) 43 67 57 a ✘ ✘ a a a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

9 smith, Adam (D) 91 96 91 a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a a a a a a a a a

KEY


housE votEs


Swee

ping

Env

ironm

enta

l Fun

ding

&

Polic

y A

ssau

lt (H

.R. 1

)

Nat

iona

l Mon

umen

ts

Cle

an W

ater

Saf

egua

rds

Flor

ida’

s W

ater

Qua

lity

The

Che

sape

ake

Bay

O�

-roa

d Ve

hicl

es in

Nat

iona

l For

ests

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Su

bsid

ies

Hol

ding

Gov

ernm

ent

Acc

ount

able

Land

& W

ater

Con

serv

atio

n Fu

nd

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Ex

pans

ion

Wea

keni

ng O

�sh

ore

Dril

ling

Ove

rsig

ht

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g Sa

fety

Ref

orm

s

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pollu

tion

Pest

icid

es P

ollu

tion

LCV SCORES

% % %

20

11

111t

h C

on

gre

ss

Lif

eti

me

b c d e f g h i j 1) 1! 1@ 1# 1$

west virGiniA1 mcKinley (R) 11 11 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 capito (R) 17 33 26 ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3 rahall (D) 51 83 66 a a a a a a ✘ a a ✘ ✘ a a ✘

wisConsin1 ryan, p. (R) 3 13 20 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

2 Baldwin (D) 97 96 97 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a3 Kind (D) 91 96 91 a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a a4 moore (D) 89 96 95 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a5 sensenbrenner (R) 3 4 34 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

6 petri (R) 11 29 47 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

7 duffy (R) 9 9 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

8 ribble (R) 6 6 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

wyominGAL lummis (R) 11 4 8 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

3. h

ou

se

sc

or

es

house votes


Gut

ting

Publ

ic H

ealth

Bas

is o

f th

e C

lean

Air

Act

Enda

nger

ed S

peci

es A

ct

Keys

tone

XL

Tar S

ands

Pip

elin

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l Fun

ding

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

& R

enew

able

Ene

rgy

Gul

f Res

tora

tion

Dirt

y W

ater

Act

Ligh

t B

ulb

Ener

gy E

�ci

ency

Sta

ndar

ds

Floo

d In

sura

nce

Reg

ulat

ory

Rol

lbac

ks (

H.R

. 10

)

Regu

lato

ry R

ollb

acks

(H

.R. 3

010

)

Cont

rolli

ng A

quat

ic In

vasi

ve S

peci

es

Har

d R

ock

Min

ing

Coa

l Ash

Pol

lutio

n

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om B

oile

rs

Toxi

c A

ir Po

llutio

n fr

om C

emen

t Pl

ants

Ass

ault

on t

he C

lean

Air

Act

1( 2) 2@ 2# 2$ 2% 2^ 2& 2*2! 2( 3) 3! 3@ 3# 3$ 3%

Cle

an W

ater

Pro

tect

ions

O�

shor

e D

rillin

g A

ir Po

llutio

n

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Ada

ptat

ion

Bor

der F

ence

Env

ironm

enta

l Miti

gatio

n

1% 1^ 1& 1*

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ a a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ ✘ a a a aa a a a a a a a a a a a a a ✘ a ✘ a a✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

✘ ✘ ✘ a ✘ ✘ a a a ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

ADD MY VOICE TO AMERICA’S ENVIRONMENTAL MAJORITY

Please visit www.lcv.org/scorecard to view the National Environmental Scorecard

electronically, share it with friends and family, and learn more about how you can join

with other environmental activists around the country who are making their voices heard

from the statehouse to the White House.

To make an additional contribution to LCV to support our efforts to turn your

environmental values into national priorities, please use the enclosed envelope or visit

www.lcv.org/donate.

Thank you for being the voice for the environment.

TM

www.facebook.com/LCVoters www.twitter.com/LCVoterswww.twitter.com/LCVPolicy

1920 L sTREET, Nw, suITE 800 · wAshINgTON, dC 20036

PhONE: 202.785.8683 · www.LCV.ORg

This publication was designed and printed using 100% wind power and was printed on an alcohol-free press with soy-based inks on 100% recycled stock.

2011 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL scorecardscorecard.lcv.org/.../files/LCV_Scorecard_2011.pdf · 2011...

Documents

Transcript of 2011 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL scorecardscorecard.lcv.org/.../files/LCV_Scorecard_2011.pdf · 2011...