2010_01_27_WIlcox Order Denying Special Prosecutor

download 2010_01_27_WIlcox Order Denying Special Prosecutor

of 1

Transcript of 2010_01_27_WIlcox Order Denying Special Prosecutor

  • 8/11/2019 2010_01_27_WIlcox Order Denying Special Prosecutor

    1/1

    9/27/2014 Media Relations and Community Outreach: Court Rulings Entry

    https://web.archive.org/web/20100527125953/http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/MediaRelationsAndCommunityOutrea ch/CourtCases/Rulings/rulingsReadite

    The Judicial Branch of Arizona, Maricopa County

    Media Relations And Community Outreach > Court Cases > Rulings

    Court Rulings

    Honorable Special Master Ruth McGregor

    Filed:1/27/2010 Case Number:CR2009-007892

    Plaintiff Prosecution

    State of Arizona Deputy County Attorney

    Lisa Aubuchon

    Paul Kittredge

    v.

    Defendant Defense

    Mary Rose Wilcox Colin Campbell

    ORAL ARGUMENT

    State's Attorney: Paul Kittredge & Lisa Aubuchon Defendant's Attorney: Kathy OMeara Defendant: Present Court Reporter: Kim McAndrews

    This is the time set for oral argument on States Motion to Approve Appointment of Special Prosecutors and States Motion for Inquiry by

    Special Master.

    States Motion to Approve Appointment of Special Prosecutors is argued.

    IT IS ORDERED taking the matter under advisement.

    States Motion for Inquiry by Special Master is argued.

    IT IS ORDERED denying the motion.

    9:27 a.m. Matter concludes.

    Later:

    After consideration, the Special Master concludes that the Arizona Supreme Courts Administrative Order 2009-124 does not confer

    jurisdi ction upon the Special Master to appoi nt a special prosecutor.

    The State and these Defendants appear to agree that, in extraordinary circumstances, the Court can exercise its inherent authority to

    appoint a special prosecutor. The State, however, filed this motion directly with the Special Master rather than bring an action requesting

    that the Court appoint a special prosecutor. As a result, there exists no pending action that the Special Master can refer to a judicial officer

    for consideration.

    The State also asserts that the Board of Supervisors abused a ministerial duty conferred upon it by A.R.S. sec. 11-493.B.1 when it refused

    to consent to the Maricopa County Attorneys request to appoint special deputy county attorneys. The States motion, filed in this criminal

    action and seeking relief in the nature of mandamus, provides no basis for the Special Master or the Court to exercise jurisdiction.

    Because the Special Master lacks jurisdiction to consider the Motion to Approve Appointment of Special Prosecutors,

    IT IS ORDERED dismissing the motion.