2010 guidelines instructor update

download 2010 guidelines instructor update

of 148

Transcript of 2010 guidelines instructor update

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    1/148

    2010 Guidelines

    Instructor Update

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    2/148

    Welcome !

    This class will provide you with information

    about the recently released changes in

    emergency medical care and how those

    changes affect your authorization as an ASHI orMEDIC First Aid Instructor.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    3/148

    Purpose of Class

    Highlight the major changes in science,

    treatment recommendations, and guidelines.

    Provide helpful guidance to you for the transition

    to new materials.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    4/148

    Learning Objectives

    Identify the four central publications for changes

    in the 2010 science, treatment

    recommendations, and guidelines.

    Identify the scheduled release dates for updatedtraining programs.

    Describe the significant changes affecting ASHI

    and MEDIC First Aid training programs.

    Describe the rationale for the changes being

    made.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    5/148

    Who is HSI?

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    6/148

    About HSI

    The Health & Safety Institute (HSI) unites therecognition and expertise of:

    American Safety & Health Institute

    MEDIC FIRST AID International 24-7 EMS

    24-7 Fire

    First Safety Institute

    HSI is the largest privately held emergency caretraining organization in the world.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    7/148

    Proven Track Record

    In business for more than 30 years.

    In more than 100 countries.

    Over 16,000 training centers approved.

    Over 200,000 Instructors authorized.

    More than 19 million providers certified.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    8/148

    Training Structure

    HSI develops and markets proprietary training

    programs, products, and services to approved

    Training Centers.

    Instructors are authorized by Training Centers tocertify course participants who successfully

    complete a training program.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    9/148

    Approved for Use

    HSIs basic and professional level programs are

    endorsed, accepted, approved, or meet the

    requirements of more than 1800 Federal and

    state regulatory agencies and occupationallicensing boards.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    10/148

    2010 ILCOR Conference

    HSI participated in the 2010 International

    Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR)

    International Conference on CPR and ECC

    Science with Treatment Recommendations.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    11/148

    International First Aid Advisory Board

    HSI representatives were members of the 2005

    National and 2010 International First Aid Advisory

    Board founded by the AHA and ARC.

    HSI representatives contributed to both the 2005and 2010 Consensus on First Aid Science and

    Treatment Recommendations.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    12/148

    Integrating 2010 Science,

    Treatment Recommendations,and Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    13/148

    Where do guidelines come from?

    Multi-year process involving resuscitation

    experts from around the world

    Results in the following publications:

    2010 Science and Treatment Recommendations ILCOR International Consensus on CPR and ECC

    AHA and ARC International Consensus on First Aid

    2010 Training Guidelines

    2010 AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC 2010 AHA and ARC Guidelines for First Aid

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    14/148

    2010 Guidelines

    The science and guidelines were published in

    the journal Circulationon October 18th, 2010

    They are both freely available at

    www.hsi.com/2010guidelines

    http://www.hsi.com/2010guidelineshttp://www.hsi.com/2010guidelines
  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    15/148

    New Program Development

    In order to integrate the 2010 guidelines, time is

    required to make systematic and organized

    changes to our products.

    We are currently revising all of our emergencycare training materials.

    New training materials will be released

    throughout 2011.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    16/148

    Source References

    2010 International Consensus on CardiopulmonaryResuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular CareScience With Treatment Recommendations

    2010 American Heart Association and American Red

    Cross International Consensus on First Aid Science WithTreatment Recommendations

    2010 American Heart Association Guidelines forCardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency

    Cardiovascular Care 2010 American Heart Association and American Red

    Cross Guidelines for First Aid

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    17/148

    Interim Training Materials

    We have created interim training materials thatallow Instructors to immediately start incorporating

    some of the most significant changes into current

    (2005) training materials.

    The interim materials are only intended to be used

    until the new training programs are made

    available.

    Use of the interim materials is an option and not arequirement. Instructors can continue to use the

    current (2005) materials as designed.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    18/148

    Using (2005) Materials

    The release of new science and treatment

    recommendations do not imply that emergency

    care or instruction involving the use of previous

    recommendations science and treatmentrecommendations is unsafe.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    19/148

    Support for Current Materials

    You may continue to purchase and teach using

    current (2005) training materials until the new

    programs are available.

    Support for the current materials will continueuntil December 31, 2011, or until the inventory of

    the materials is depleted.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    20/148

    Planned 2nd Quarter 2011 Release

    ASHI

    CPR and AED

    Basic First Aid

    CPR, AED, and Basic First Aid Combination CPR Pro

    MEDIC First Aid

    CarePlus CPR and AED

    BasicPlus CPR, AED, and First Aid

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    21/148

    Planned 3rd Quarter 2011 Release

    ASHI

    Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) *

    Bloodborne and Airborne Pathogens

    MEDIC First Aid PediatricPlus CPR, AED, and First Aid for Children,

    Adults, and Infants

    CPR and AED Child/Infant Supplement

    Bloodborne and Airborne Pathogens

    *Release date is dependent on third party production.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    22/148

    Planned 4th Quarter 2011 Release

    ASHI

    Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS)*

    Child and Babysitting Safety Course (CABS)

    *Release date is dependent on third party production.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    23/148

    Update Requirements

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    24/148

    Need to Know

    Every Instructor needs to understand the

    guideline changes that affect the program(s) he

    or she is authorized to teach.

    In the following pages we have organized themost significant guideline changes by area and

    training level.

    For each identified change, the lesson provides

    the 2005 guideline for reference, the updated

    2010 guideline, and the reason for the change.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    25/148

    Lay and Healthcare Providers

    Some of the lessons cover lay providers and

    some cover healthcare providers.

    Even though an Instructor may only teach a

    single provider level, the comparison informationfrom the other level may be valuable for

    understanding and ability to answer student

    questions.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    26/148

    ACLS and PALS

    Specific information regarding the changes in

    our advanced training programs, ASHI ACLS

    and ASHI PALS is not included in this

    presentation. The information is provided in the HSI 2010

    Updated Training Guidelines Supplement found

    in the document section of the online Instructor

    Portal.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    27/148

    CPR and AED

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    28/148

    Emphasis on High-Quality CPR

    blood flow is optimized by using the recommended chest compression

    force and duration and maintaining a chest compression rate of

    approximately 100 compressions per minute. These guidelines

    recommend that all rescuers minimize interruption of chest compressions CPR instruction should emphasize the importance of allowing complete

    chest recoil between compressions.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    29/148

    Emphasis on High-Quality CPR

    To provide effective chest compressions, push

    hard and push fast. compress the adult chest

    at a rate of at least 100 compressions per

    minute with a compression depth of at least 2inches/5 cm. allow complete recoil of the

    chest after each compression, to allow the heart

    to fill completely before the next compression.

    minimize the frequency and duration of

    interruptions in compressions to maximize the

    number of compressions delivered per minute.

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    30/148

    Highlights

    This is a re-emphasis from 2005.

    For effective compressions:

    Push fast

    Push hard Allow chest to fully recoil

    Minimize any interruptions

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    31/148

    Rationale For Change

    High-quality chest compressions within CPR

    continues to be a critical focal point.

    Well-performed compressions increase the

    likelihood of survival.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    32/148

    Compression Hand Position

    The rescuer should compress the lower half of the victims sternum in the

    center (middle) of the chest, between the nipples. The rescuer should

    place the heel of the hand on the sternum in the center (middle) of the

    chest between the nipples and then place the heel of the second hand ontop of the first so that the hands are overlapped and parallel.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    33/148

    Compression Hand Position

    The rescuer should place the heel of one hand

    on the center (middle) of the victims chest

    (which is the lower half of the sternum) and the

    heel of the other hand on top of the first so thatthe hands are overlapped and parallel.

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    34/148

    Highlights

    Hands in centerof the chest.

    Lower halfof breastbone

    Second hand on top of the first.

    Not on lowest part of breastbone.

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    35/148

    Rationale For Change

    Use of the nipple line as a landmark for

    hand placement was found to be unreliable.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    36/148

    Compression Rate

    There is insufficient evidence from human studies to identify a single

    optimal chest compression rate. Animal and human studies support a

    chest compression rate of >80 compressions per minute to achieve

    optimal forward blood flow during CPR. We recommend a compressionrate ofabout 100compressions per minute.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    37/148

    Compression Rate

    It is reasonable for laypersons and healthcare

    providers to compress the adult chest at arate of at least 100 compressions per minute

    with a compression depth of at least 2 inches(5 cm.)

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    38/148

    Highlights

    At least 100 times per minute.

    It is okay to be a little faster.

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    39/148

    Rationale For Change

    It has been found that higher survival rates are

    associated with an increase in the number of

    compressions provided per minute.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    40/148

    Child/Infant Compression Rate

    Push fast; push at a rate ofapproximately 100 compressions perminute.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV156-IV166)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    41/148

    Child/Infant Compression Rate

    Push fast; push at a rate ofat least 100compressions per minute.

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S862-S875)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    42/148

    Highlights

    Rescuers tend to compress slower.

    At least 100 compressions per minute.

    It is okay to be a little faster.

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    43/148

    Rationale For Change

    It has been found that higher survival rates are

    associated with an increase in the number of

    compressions provided per minute.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    44/148

    Compression Depth

    Depress the sternum approximately1 to 2 inches (approximately 4 to5 cm) and then allow the chest to return to its normal position.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    45/148

    Compression Depth

    It is reasonable for laypersons and healthcare

    providers to compress the adult chest at a rate of

    at least 100 compressions per minute with a

    compression depth of at least 2 inches/5 cm.

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    46/148

    Highlights

    At least 2 inches on an adult.

    It is okay to compress a little deeper.

    Not enough information to define upper limit.

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    47/148

    Rationale For Change

    Research indicates the tendency for CPR

    providers to not compress deep enough, even

    with the emphasis to "push hard."

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    48/148

    Child/Infant Compression Depth

    Push hard: push with sufficient force to depress the chest approximatelyone third to one half the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV156-IV166)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    49/148

    Child/Infant Compression Depth

    Chest compressions of appropriate rate and

    depth. Push fast: push at a rate of at least 100

    compressions per minute. Push hard: push

    with sufficient force to depress at least onethird the anterior-posterior (AP) diameter ofthe chest or approximately 1 inches (4 cm)in infants and 2 inches (5 cm) in children.

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S862-S875)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    50/148

    Highlights

    At least 1/3 of the anterior/posterior diameter of

    chest.

    About 2 inches for children and about 1

    inches for infants. It is okay to compress a little deeper

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    51/148

    Rationale For Change

    Research indicates the tendency for CPR

    providers to not compress deep enough, even

    with the emphasis to "push hard."

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    52/148

    Breathing Assessment

    While maintaining an open airway, look, listen, and feel for breathing.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    53/148

    Breathing Assessment

    After activation of the emergency response system, all rescuers should

    immediately begin CPR for adult victims who are unresponsive with no

    breathing or no normal breathing (only gasping).

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    54/148

    Highlights

    No more look, listen, and feel.

    Quick look for no breathing or no normal

    breathing.

    Agonal breaths remain a concern. Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    55/148

    Rationale for Change

    Simplifying the breathing assessment is

    intended to help laypersons respond more

    quickly with chest compressions and CPR.

    There is a high likelihood of agonal, or irregular,gasping breaths to occur early in cardiac arrest

    and confuse rescuers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    56/148

    CPR Sequence - Lay

    For an unresponsive person who is not breathing or not breathing

    normally, begin CPR by opening the airway and giving 2 rescue breaths

    followed with 30 chest compressions. Repeat cycles of30:2 (ABC

    method).

    (Summary from Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    57/148

    CPR Sequence - Lay

    For an unresponsive person, activate EMS,

    then assess breathing. If the person is not

    breathing or not breathing normally, begin CPR

    with 30 compressions followed by opening theairway and giving 2 rescue breaths. Repeat

    cycles of30:2 (CAB method).

    (Summary from Berg, et al. Circulation.2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    58/148

    Highlights

    Initial assessment steps: Assess responsiveness

    Activate EMS(emergency medical services)

    Assess breathing

    Perform CPR CAB begin CPR cycles with compressions,

    followed by airway and breathing.

    Guideline applies to adults, children, and infants.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    59/148

    Rationale For Change

    The science indicates the importance of not

    delaying chest compressions to perform rescue

    breaths.

    Early chest compression can immediatelycirculate oxygen that is still in the bloodstream.

    CPR S HCP

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    60/148

    CPR Sequence - HCP

    For an unresponsive person who is not

    breathing or not breathing normally, begin CPR

    by opening the airway and giving 2 rescue

    breaths followed with 30 chest compressions.Repeat cycles of 30:2 (ABC method).

    (Summary from Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

    CPR S HCP

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    61/148

    CPR Sequence - HCP

    For an unresponsive person who is not

    breathing or not breathing normally, and has no

    obvious pulse, activate EMS and begin CPR

    with 30 compressions followed by opening theairway and giving 2 rescue breaths. Repeat

    cycles of 30:2 (CAB method).

    (Summary from Berg, et al. Circulation.2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    62/148

    Highlights

    Initial assessment approach: Assess responsiveness and breathing

    Activate EMS

    Assess pulse

    Perform CPR

    CAB begin CPR cycles with compressions,

    followed by airway and breathing.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    63/148

    Rationale For Change

    The science indicates the importance of not

    delaying chest compressions to perform rescue

    breaths.

    Early chest compression can immediatelycirculate oxygen that is still in the bloodstream.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    64/148

    Use of an AED on an Infant

    There is insufficient data to make a

    recommendation for or against the use of AEDs

    for infants 1 year of age.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV156-IV166)

    2005 Guidelines

    f f

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    65/148

    Use of an AED on an Infant

    Many AEDs have high specificity in recognizing

    pediatric shockable rhythms, and some are

    equipped to decrease (or attenuate) the

    delivered energy to make them suitable forinfants and children < 8 years of age. For

    infants an AED equipped with a pediatric

    attenuator is preferred for infants. If neither is

    available, an AED without a dose attenuator

    may be used.

    (Link, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S706-S719)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    66/148

    Highlights

    Success at defibrillating infants.

    Use attenuator to reduce shock.

    Okay to use AED set for adult.

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    67/148

    Rationale For Change

    AEDs designed to be used on adults have been

    successful when used on infants with out-of-

    hospital cardiac arrest.

    Minimal heart muscle damage and goodneurological outcomes were reported.

    Ch i f S i l

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    68/148

    Chain of Survival

    Early recognition of the emergency and

    activation of the emergency medical services

    (EMS) or local emergency response system

    Early bystander CPREarly delivery of a shock with a defibrillator

    Early advanced life support followed by post

    resuscitation care delivered by healthcare

    providers

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV12-IV18)

    2005 Guidelines

    Ch i f S i l

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    69/148

    Chain of Survival

    These actions are termed the links in the Chain

    of Survival. For adults they include:

    Immediate recognition of cardiac arrest and

    activation of the emergency response system

    Early CPR that emphasizes chest

    compressions

    Rapid defibrillation if indicated

    Effective advanced life support

    Integrated postcardiac arrest care.

    (Travers, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S676-S684)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    70/148

    Highlights

    Addition of fifth link in chain.

    Integrated post-cardiac arrest care.

    Applies to both lay and healthcare providers.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    71/148

    Rationale For Change

    Links in the Chain of Survival indicate theindividual actions that must be strong in

    order for a person to survive a sudden

    cardiac arrest.

    The addition of the fifth link, integrated post-

    cardiac arrest care, further emphasizes the

    additional dependence on longer-term care

    for long-term survival.

    C i id P HCP

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    72/148

    Cricoid Pressure - HCP

    Cricoid pressure should be used only if the

    victim is deeply unconscious.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

    C i id P HCP

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    73/148

    Cricoid Pressure - HCP

    The routine use of cricoid pressure in adult

    cardiac arrest is not recommended.

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    74/148

    Highlights

    Cricoid may impede ventilation.

    Difficult to teach.

    May prevent advanced airway placement.

    Aspiration may still occur.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    75/148

    Rationale For Change

    Regardless of expertise, rescuers cannoteffectively apply cricoid pressure.

    T A h HCP

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    76/148

    Team Approach - HCP

    When multiple rescuers are present, they should rotate the compressor

    role about every 2 minutes. The switch should be accomplished as quickly

    as possible (ideally in less than 5 seconds) to minimize interruptions in

    chest compressions.

    (Circulation. 2005;112:IV-12-IV-17)

    2005 Guidelines

    T A h HCP

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    77/148

    Team Approach - HCP

    The intent of the algorithm is to present the steps of BLS in a logical and

    concise manner that is easy for all types of rescuers to learn, remember and

    perform. These actions have traditionally been presented as a sequence of

    distinct steps to help a single rescuer prioritize actions. However, manyworkplaces and most EMS and in-hospital resuscitations involve teams of

    providers who should perform several actions simultaneously (e.g.: one

    rescuer activates the emergency response system while another begins chest

    compressions, and a third either provides ventilations or retrieves the bag-

    mask for rescue breathing, and a fourth retrieves and sets up a defibrillator).

    (Berg, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S685-S705)

    2010 Guidelines

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    78/148

    Highlights

    Tasks can be performed simultaneously.

    Integrate additional rescuers as they arrive.

    Designate team leader with multiple

    rescuers.

    R i l F Ch

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    79/148

    Rationale For Change

    Some resuscitations start with a lone rescuerand builds to more, whereas other resuscitations

    begin with several willing rescuers.

    Training should focus on building a team andperforming tasks simultaneously.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    80/148

    Emergency Care / First Aid

    For Lay Providers

    Pressure Points and Elevation

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    81/148

    Pressure Points and Elevation

    There is insufficient evidence to recommend for

    or against the first aid use of pressure points or

    extremity elevation to control hemorrhage.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV196-IV203)

    2005 Guidelines

    Pressure Points and Elevation

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    82/148

    Pressure Points and Elevation

    Elevation and use of pressure points are not

    recommended to control bleeding.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946) )

    2010 Guidelines

    Hi hli ht

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    83/148

    Highlights

    Not recommended.

    Direct pressure is more effective.

    May compromise direct pressure.

    R ti l F Ch

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    84/148

    Rationale For Change

    Elevation and pressure points are unprovenprocedures that may compromise the proven

    intervention of direct pressure, so they could be

    harmful.

    Tourniquets

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    85/148

    Tourniquets

    The effectiveness, feasibility, and safety of

    tourniquets to control bleeding by first aid

    providers are unknown, but the use of

    tourniquets is potentially dangerous.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV196-IV203)

    2005 Guidelines

    Tourniquets

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    86/148

    Tourniquets

    Because of the potential adverse effects of

    tourniquets and difficulty in their proper

    application, use of a tourniquet to control

    bleeding of the extremities is indicated only ifdirect pressure is not effective or possible.

    Specifically designed tourniquets appear to be

    better than ones that are improvised, but

    tourniquets should only be used with proper

    training.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Hi hli ht

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    87/148

    Highlights

    Use only if direct pressure will not work.

    Effective in certain conditions.

    Commercial better than improvised.

    Training necessary.

    R ti l F Ch

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    88/148

    Rationale For Change

    Tourniquets have been shown to controlbleeding effectively and without complications

    on the battlefield, during surgery, and when

    used by paramedics in a civilian setting.

    There are no studies on controlling bleeding

    with first aid provider use of a tourniquet.

    Hemostatic Agents

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    89/148

    Hemostatic Agents

    The use of hemostatic agents in first aid was

    not covered in the 2005 science, treatment

    recommendations, and guidelines.

    2005 Guidelines

    Hemostatic Agents

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    90/148

    Hemostatic Agents

    Routine use of hemostatic agents in first aid

    cannot be recommended at this time because of

    significant variation in effectiveness by different

    agents and their potential for adverse effects,including tissue destruction with induction of a

    proembolic state and potential thermal injury.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    91/148

    Highlights

    Some are effective, others are marginal.

    Wide variety of results.

    Potential for adverse effects.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    92/148

    Rationale For Change

    The use of commercially available hemostaticagents to control bleeding is not recommended

    because the agent and conditions for its

    application are not known.

    Leg Elevation for Shock

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    93/148

    Leg Elevation for Shock

    The use of elevation for the treatment of shock

    in first aid was not covered in the 2005 science,

    treatment recommendations, and guidelines.

    2005 Guidelines

    Leg Elevation for Shock

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    94/148

    Leg Elevation for Shock

    If a victim shows evidence of shock, have the

    victim lie supine. If there is no evidence of trauma

    or injury, raise the feet about 6 to 12 inches (about

    30 to 45). Do not raise the feet if the movementor the position causes the victim any pain.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    95/148

    Highlights

    Lay victim flat.

    If no injury, elevate 6-12 inches.

    No elevation if pain occurs.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    96/148

    Rationale For Change

    Elevating the legs can be beneficial in cases inwhich the mechanism of shock is related to

    factors other than injury.

    The risk of further injury outweighs the benefit ofelevation when a person is injured.

    Injured Extremity

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    97/148

    Injured Extremity

    If you are far from definitive health care, you

    may stabilize the extremity in the position

    found.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV196-IV203)

    2005 Guidelines

    Injured Extremity

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    98/148

    Injured Extremity

    If you are far from definitive health care, stabilize

    the extremity with a splint in the position found. If

    a splint is used, it should be padded to cushion

    the injury.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    99/148

    Highlights

    Stabilize with splint if away from medical help.

    Splint in position found.

    Use padding.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    100/148

    Rationale For Change

    Expert opinion suggests that splinting for anextremity injury may reduce pain and prevent

    further injury, especially when professional care

    is delayed or it is decided to move the injured

    person.

    Aspirin for Chest Discomfort

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    101/148

    Aspirin for Chest Discomfort

    The use of aspirin for chest discomfort in first

    aid was not covered in the 2005 science,

    treatment recommendations, and guidelines.

    2005 Guidelines

    Aspirin for Chest Discomfort

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    102/148

    Aspirin for Chest Discomfort

    While waiting for EMS to arrive, the first aid

    provider may encourage the victim to chew 1

    adult (not enteric coated) or 2 low-dose baby

    aspirin if the patient has no allergy to aspirin orother contraindication to aspirin, such as

    evidence of a stroke or recent bleeding.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    103/148

    Highlights

    Encourage victim while waiting for EMS.

    One adult or two baby aspirin.

    Non-coated.

    No allergies. No contraindication.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    104/148

    Rationale For Change

    Evidence clearly demonstrated that theadministration of aspirin within the first

    hours of onset of chest discomfort in people

    with acute coronary syndromes reduced

    mortality.

    Epinephrine for Anaphylaxis

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    105/148

    Epinephrine for Anaphylaxis

    "First aid providers should be familiar with the

    epinephrine auto-injector so that they can help

    someone having an anaphylactic reaction self-

    administer the epinephrine. First aid providers

    should be able to administer the auto-injector if

    the victim is unable to do so, provided that the

    medication has been prescribed by a physician

    and state law permits (second dose notaddressed).

    (Circulation. 2005;112:IV-196-IV-203)

    2005 Guidelines

    Epinephrine for Anaphylaxis

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    106/148

    Epinephrine for Anaphylaxis

    First aid providers are advised to seek medical

    assistance if symptoms persist, rather than

    routinely administering a second dose of

    epinephrine. In unusual circumstances, whenadvanced medical assistance is not available, a

    second dose of epinephrine may be given if

    symptoms of anaphylaxis persist.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-

    S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    107/148

    Highlights

    Some people require a second dose.

    Epinephrine is potentially harmful.

    No routine second dose.

    If medical assistance not available, providesecond dose if symptoms persist.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    108/148

    Rationale For Change

    If medical assistance is available, it is less likelythat an unnecessary second dose of epinephrine

    will be given.

    Chemical Burns to the Eye

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    109/148

    Chemical Burns to the Eye

    In case of an acid or alkali exposure to the skin

    or eye, immediately irrigate the affected area

    with copious amounts of water.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV196-IV203)

    2005 Guidelines

    Chemical Burns to the Eye

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    110/148

    Chemical Burns to the Eye

    Rinse eyes exposed to toxic substances

    immediately with a copious amount of water,

    unless a specific antidote is available.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    111/148

    Highlights

    Rinse with large amounts of water.

    Use specific antidote if available.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    112/148

    Rationale For Change

    Immediate irrigation of eyes exposed to a toxinwith large amounts of water is recommended.

    Specialized therapeutic rinsing solutions that

    have been properly tested and approved may be

    available and should be used.

    Heat Stroke

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    113/148

    The treatment of heat stroke in first aid was not

    covered in the 2005 science, treatment

    recommendations, and guidelines.

    2005 Guidelines

    Heat Stroke

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    114/148

    The most important action by a first aid provider

    for a victim of heat stroke is to begin immediate

    cooling, preferably by immersing the victim up to

    the chin in cold water.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-

    S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    115/148

    Highlights

    Immediate cooling emphasized.

    Immersion up to neck in cold water

    preferred as an option.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    116/148

    Rationale For Change

    Immediate cooling emphasizes the criticaldanger associated with heat stroke.

    Complete immersion in cold water has been

    found to be the most effective method of cooling

    the body in heat stroke.

    Supplemental Oxygen in Diving

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    117/148

    pp yg g

    The use of supplemental oxygen for diving

    injuries in first aid was not covered in the 2005

    science, treatment recommendations, and

    guidelines.

    2005 Guidelines

    Supplemental Oxygen in Diving

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    118/148

    pp yg g

    Supplementary oxygen administration may be

    beneficial as part of first aid for divers with a

    decompression injury.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    119/148

    Rationale For Change

    There is evidence oxygen may be beneficialfor divers with a decompression injury.

    Activated Charcoal

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    120/148

    There is insufficient evidence to recommend for

    or against the use of activated charcoal as first

    aid for ingestions.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV196-IV203)

    2005 Guidelines

    Activated Charcoal

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    121/148

    Do not administer activated charcoal to a victim

    who has ingested a poisonous substance unless

    you are advised to do so by poison control center

    or emergency medical personnel.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    122/148

    Highlights

    Use only if directed by poison control.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    123/148

    Rationale For Change

    There is no evidence that activated charcoal iseffective as a component of first aid.

    It may be difficult to administer and it has not

    been shown to be beneficial.

    There are reports of it causing harm.

    Pressure Immobilization for Snakebite

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    124/148

    In case of an elapid (e.g., coral) snakebite,

    wrap a bandage snugly (comfortably tight but

    loose enough to slip or fit a finger under it)

    around the entire length of the bitten extremity,

    immobilize the extremity, and get definitivemedical help as rapidly as possible.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV196-IV203)

    2005 Guidelines

    Pressure Immobilization for Snakebite

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    125/148

    Applying a pressure immobilization bandage

    around the entire length of the bitten extremity is

    an effective and safe way to slow the

    dissemination of venom pressure is sufficient if

    the bandage allows a finger to be slipped

    under it. Initially it was theorized that external

    pressure would only benefit victims bitten by

    snakes producing neurotoxic venom, but the

    effectiveness has also been demonstrated for

    bites by non-neurotoxic American snakes.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    126/148

    g g

    Pressure immobilization safe and effective. Be able to slide finger underneath.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    127/148

    g

    Applying a pressure immobilization bandagehas shown to be an effective way to slow the

    dissemination of venom for all venomous

    snake bites, not just those from elapids.

    Jellyfish Stings

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    128/148

    The treatment of jellyfish stings in first aid was

    not covered in the 2005 science, treatment

    recommendations, and guidelines.

    2005 Guidelines

    Jellyfish Stings

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    129/148

    To inactivate venom load and prevent further

    envenomation, jellyfish stings should be liberally

    washed with vinegar (4% to 6% acetic acid

    solution) as soon as possible for at least 30

    seconds. For the treatment of pain, after the

    nematocysts are removed or deactivated, jellyfish

    stings should be treated with hot-water immersion

    when possible.

    (Markenson, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S934-

    S946)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    130/148

    g g

    Vinegar wash for 30 seconds to inactivatenematocysts.

    Follow with hot-water immersion for pain control.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    131/148

    g

    Vinegar is most effective for inactivation of thenematocysts.

    Immersion in water, as hot as tolerated for about

    20 minutes, has been found to be the most

    effective treatment for the pain.

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    132/148

    Education / Implementation

    Skills Reinforcement

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    133/148

    Ongoing skills reinforcement was not covered in

    the 2005 science, treatment recommendations,

    and guidelines.

    2005 Guidelines

    Skills Reinforcement

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    134/148

    While the optimal mechanism for maintenance of

    competence is not known, the need to move toward

    more frequent assessment and reinforcement of skills

    is clear. Skill performance should be assessed during

    the 2-year certification with reinforcement provided as

    needed. The optimal timing and method for this

    assessment and reinforcement are not known.

    (Bhanji, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S920-S933)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    135/148

    g g

    Need for more frequent review is clear. Optimum reinforcement not known.

    Reassess and reinforce.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    136/148

    g

    Retention of skills deteriorates very quickly aftertraining.

    Frequent skill refreshers should help to maintain

    reasonable skill performance.

    Self-Instruction

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    137/148

    Instruction methods should not be limited to

    traditional techniques; newer training methods

    (e.g., watch-while-you practice

    video programs) may be more effective.

    (Circulation. 2005;112:III-100-III-108)

    2005 Guidelines

    Self-Instruction

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    138/148

    Short video instruction combined with

    synchronous hands-on practice is an effective

    alternative to instructor-led basic life support

    courses.

    (Bhanji, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S920-S933)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    139/148

    Video self-instruction with practice-while-watching is effective.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    140/148

    Studies have demonstrated that lay rescuerCPR skills can be acquired and retained at least

    as well through interactive computer- and video-

    based synchronous practice when compared

    with instructor-led courses.

    Skills Competency

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    141/148

    Training programs should be evaluated to

    verify that they enable effective skills acquisition

    and retention.

    (Circulation. 2005;112:III-100-III-108)

    2005 Guidelines

    Skills Competency

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    142/148

    Successful course completion should be based

    on the ability of the learner to demonstrate

    achievement of course objectives rather than

    attendance in a course/program for a specific

    time period.

    (Bhanji, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S920-S933)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    143/148

    Verification of competence, not a set number ofclass hours.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    144/148

    Reflecting emerging trends, there is supportto move toward a more competency-based

    approach to resuscitation education for all

    rescuers.

    Prompting and Feedback Devices

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    145/148

    A CPR prompt device may be useful in both

    out-of-hospital and in-hospital settings.

    (Circulation. 2005; 112: IV19-IV34)

    2005 Guidelines

    Prompting and Feedback Devices

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    146/148

    Training in CPR skills using a feedback device

    improves learning and/or retention. The use of a

    CPR feedback device can be effective for training.

    CPR prompting and feedback devices can be

    useful as part of an overall strategy to improve the

    quality of CPR during actual resuscitations.

    (Bhanji, et al. Circulation. 2010;122;S920-S933)

    2010 Guidelines

    Highlights

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    147/148

    Effective in training. Improves quality of actual resuscitation.

    Rationale For Change

  • 7/30/2019 2010 guidelines instructor update

    148/148

    The evidence has shown prompting andfeedback devices to be effective in CPR training

    and during actual resuscitations.

    Commercially-produced devices are now more

    readily available for use.