20092009--2014 M2014 M--DCPS Strategic DCPS Strategic ...
Transcript of 20092009--2014 M2014 M--DCPS Strategic DCPS Strategic ...
20092009--2014 M2014 M--DCPS Strategic DCPS Strategic FrameworkFrameworkM DCPS i f d i l l St d t A hi tM-DCPS is focused on a singular goal: Student Achievement
Each student succeeds as measured by:1. Graduating2. Having a post-secondary plan3 Demonstrating age/grade level appropriate knowledge mastery
EducationThis pillar supports activities and functions
Student, Parent and Community Engagement
3. Demonstrating age/grade level appropriate knowledge mastery4. Successfully entering the higher education arena and/or workforce
p ppleading to an educational experience that fosters individual excellence in a collaborative environment leading to
responsible citizenship, globalawareness and lifelong
and Community EngagementThis pillar supports activities and functions which enhance student, parent, and community understanding, awareness, and
St d t awareness, and lifelonglearning.
Financial School/District
support for our schools and District.
Student Achievement:
Preparing for Success in the Third MillenniumFinancial
Efficiency/StabilityThis pillar supports activities and functions that ensure effective and ethical b i ti d t d hi
School/District Leadership
This pillar supports activities and functions which enhance talent
it t d t l d hi
the Third Millennium
business operations, sound stewardship of resources, and responsible budget management.
recruitment and management, leadership development and effective and ethical governance.
School Board Members Dr. Solomon C. Stinson, Chair
Perla Tabares Hantman, Vice Chair Agustin J. Barrera
Reneir Diaz de la Portilla Dr. Lawrence S. Feldman Dr. Wilbert “Tee” Holloway
Dr. Martin Karp Ana Rivas Logan Dr. Marta Pérez
Eboni Finley, Student Advisor
Superintendent of Schools Alberto M. Carvalho
M SIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLgiving our s tuden ts the w orld
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Message from the School Board Chair....................................1 Message from the Superintendent ..........................................3 District Profile ..........................................................................5 Strategic Planning Process......................................................7 District’s Vision, Mission, and Core Values..............................9 District Goal ........................................................................... 11 Strategic Framework..............................................................13 2009-10 Initiatives .................................................................14 Millennial Access Platforms (MAPS) .................................... 15 Appendix Direct Reports to the Superintendent ............................ A 2009-2014 Strategic Plan Survey Results ..................... B Selected Research ........................................................ C 2009-10 Initiative Summaries ........................................D
1
MESSAGE FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD CHAIR
The 2009-2014 District Strategic Plan focuses the efforts
of this organization on one goal which is “Student
Achievement: Preparing for Success in the Third
Millennium”. This in effect translates to each student
striving for academic success both personally and
civically; by demonstrating age/grade level appropriate
knowledge mastery; having a post-secondary plan;
graduating and successfully entering the workforce or
higher education.
The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida
adopted the 2009-2014 District Strategic Plan which is the foundation to which all
activities and resources can be aligned to achieve the District’s mission of providing
the highest quality education to our students. The plan incorporates district-wide
efforts in making students more competitive in the global market. Parental and teacher
involvement are critical to the success of the District’s Strategic Plan.
As Board Chair and on behalf of the School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida, I
take this opportunity to thank all of the stakeholders who have participated in the
development of this plan. The collective efforts of all parties involved in making our
students marketable are our goal. We are committed to providing a superior education
to every student that enters the doors of Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
Dr. Solomon C. Stinson Chair
2
3
MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT
The 2009-2014 Miami-Dade County Public Schools’ Strategic Framework represents a departure from previous planning efforts. This Strategic Framework, created with the help and input of a broad range of stakeholders, focuses on a singular goal of “Student Achievement” and will serve as a living document which will be used to drive the important work of public education forward as we transition to third millennium educational platforms. While the initiatives and strategies outlined in this framework may be amended over time, the singular goal of “Student Achievement: Preparing for Success in the Third Millennium” will never be compromised. There are Four Pillars that will support our goal of “Student
Achievement,” and first among these is Student, Parent, and Community Engagement. The work that will occur within this Pillar, as well as the Education; School/District Leadership; and Financial Efficiency/Stability Pillars will be aligned directly to improving the academic outcomes for our students.
This document represents a major step forward into the future and a recognition that what happens in the classroom must be linked to the dreams and aspirations that students have for themselves. As educators, we must broaden the concept of what is relevant to students by exposing them to what matters to the rest of the world, by informing them of what is required to succeed, and by doing so in a manner which excites and engages them. As a community, we must join together in support of children, helping them to learn not only how to be students, but also how to be responsible citizens of the world. To meet this challenge, particularly in uncertain economic times, we must be adaptable, innovative, and able to respond both to opportunities and challenges. Aligning our decision-making processes within this Strategic Framework will facilitate just such a paradigm shift.
I am grateful to all those that contributed to this work and I am proud of the partnerships that have been formed in service to our students and our schools. Together we will achieve our vision of educational excellence for each child.
Alberto M. Carvalho Superintendent
4
5
DISTRICT PROFILE 2008-2009
General information1 Number of schools: 415 Number of students: 345,150 Annual budget $5,542,364,940 Personnel Total full-time staff: 38,819 Total teachers: 21,260 Average years teaching2: 11 Salary: $50,262 Average teacher's salary excluding fringe benefits (salary for ten months) Student membership1 Including Charter Schools Number of students by ethnicity: Hispanic: 215,896 Black non-hispanic: 88,610 White non-hispanic: 31,457 Other: 9,187 Number of students by gender: Male: 177,177 Female: 167,973 Percentage of students receiving free/reduced price lunch1 Elementary: 72.2 K-8: 49.3 Middle: 68.0 Senior High: 53.8 Alternative: 60.9 District-wide: 63.4 Number of students in summer school (Summer 2005)1 Elementary: 3,109 K-8: 438 Middle: 1,232 Senior High: 2,400 Specialized Centers: 4,609 Total: 11,788
Charter Schools1
Number of schools: 75 Number of students: 23,942
Controlled choice schools1 Enhanced curricula focused on academic themes offered to parents residing within the six controlled choice attendance boundaries.
Number of schools: 14 Number of students: 7,451
Adult/Vocational centers3
Number of centers: 21 Number of students: 54,730
Exceptional Student Education (ESE) programs4
Number of students: 54,284 Gifted: 28,923 Other ESE: 25,361
English Language Learners (ELLs) programs1
Number of students: 50,859
Magnet programs1
Number of programs: 129 Number of students: 39,407
Enrollment in advanced level courses1
Enrollment in honors, dual enrollment, and advanced placement courses: 203,524 As a percent of total 9-12 student periods: 33.1
Number of students enrolled in vocational courses1
Grades 6-8: 18,068 Grades 9-12: 77,843
Sources: 1. Statistical Highlights 2008-09 – based on October 2008 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) calculations 2. Office of Assessment, Research and Data Analysis – based on October 2008 FTE calculations 3. Office of Adult/Vocational, Alternative and Community Education (November 2008) 4. Office of Assessment, Research and Data Analysis – based on February 2009 FTE calculations 5. Division of Bilingual Education and World Languages – based on October 2008 FTE calculations
6
7
STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS
The strategic planning process is an on-going, deep and meaningful function which continually focuses District activities and resources in support of student achievement.
Take Stock
Establish Framework To Support
Goal
Implement Supporting Strategies
Stakeholder Input
Define Strategic Direction and Goal
8
9
VISION
CORE VALUES
We are committed to provide educational excellence for all.
We provide the highest quality education so that all of our students are empowered to lead
productive and fulfilling lives as lifelong learners and responsible citizens.
Excellence We pursue the highest standards in academic achievement and organizational performance.
Integrity
We build positive relationships through honesty, respect and compassion, which enhance the self-
esteem, safety, and well-being of our students, families and staff.
Equity
We foster an environment that serves all students and aspires to eliminate the achievement gap.
Citizenship
We honor the diversity of our community by working as a team to ensure the educational
success of all our students and recognize the our obligations go beyond our professional
responsibilities to promote democratic principles.
10
11
ONE DISTRICT GOAL
Student Achievement: Preparing for Success in the
Third Millennium
Each student succeeds academically, personally, and civically as measured by:
1. demonstrating age/grade level appropriate knowledge mastery
2. having a post-secondary plan 3. graduating 4. successfully entering higher education arena and/or
the workforce
12
13
STR
ATEG
IC F
RA
MEW
OR
K
14
2009
-10
INIT
IATI
VES*
Stud
ent,
Pare
nt a
nd
Com
mun
ity
Enga
gem
ent
1.
Laun
ch A
lum
ni O
utre
ach
Plan
. 2.
In
crea
se P
aren
t and
C
omm
unity
Par
ticip
atio
n in
Adv
ocac
y Ef
fort
s.
3.
Expa
nd S
ervi
ce-L
earn
ing
proj
ects
to E
lem
enta
ry
and
Mid
dle
Scho
ol le
vels
. 4.
In
crea
se U
tiliz
atio
n of
Te
chno
logy
to E
ngag
e C
omm
unity
Mem
bers
.
Educ
atio
n
1.
Educ
atio
n Pl
an
2.
Mia
mi E
diso
n Ed
u-Pl
ex
3.
Succ
ess
Aca
dem
y 4.
C
ultu
ral L
itera
cy
Initi
ativ
es
5.
Link
s to
Lea
rnin
g 6.
Vi
rtua
l Sch
ool P
rogr
ams
7.
M-D
CPS
Prim
ary
Lear
ning
Cen
ter
8.
Blu
e La
kes
Aut
ism
A
cade
my
9.
Mul
tilin
gual
Edu
catio
n Pr
ogra
ms
10. P
rofe
ssio
nal
Dev
elop
men
t: Le
arni
ng
on th
e G
o
Scho
ol/D
istr
ict
Lead
ersh
ip
1.
Ever
ybod
y Te
ache
s 2.
Te
ach
For A
mer
ica
3.
En
terp
rise
Res
ourc
e Pl
anni
ng
(a
nd re
late
d pr
oces
s im
prov
emen
ts)
4.
Educ
ator
s in
Res
iden
ce
Fina
ncia
l Ef
ficie
ncy/
Sta
bilit
y
1.
Valu
e-ba
sed
budg
etin
g
2.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
SA
P &
C
ogno
s 3.
R
educ
tion
of o
ur c
arbo
n fo
otpr
int
4.
Mov
emen
t to
self-
insu
red
plat
form
for h
ealth
in
sura
nce
* In
itiat
ives
sum
mar
ized
in a
ppen
dix
D
15
Mill
enni
al A
cces
s Pl
atfo
rms
(MA
PS)
APPENDIX A
SUPERINTENDENT DIRECT REPORTS
DIR
ECT
REP
OR
TS T
O T
HE
SU
PER
INTE
ND
ENT
OF
SCH
OO
LS
5 R
egio
n Su
perin
tend
ents
Chi
ef o
f Pol
ice
and
D
istri
ct S
ecur
ity
Adm
inis
trativ
e D
irect
or
Bus
ines
s S
ervi
ces,
Ac
coun
tabi
lity
and
Per
form
ance
Chi
ef F
acilit
ies
Offi
cer
Ass
ista
nt S
uper
inte
nden
t In
terg
over
nmen
tal A
ffairs
, G
rant
s A
dmin
istra
tion
and
Com
mun
ity S
ervi
ces
Ass
ista
nt S
uper
inte
nden
t D
iffer
entia
ted
Acc
ount
abili
ty
Chi
ef C
omm
unic
atio
ns
Offi
cer
Ass
ocia
te S
uper
inte
nden
t C
urric
ulum
and
Inst
ruct
ion
Ass
ocia
te S
uper
inte
nden
t an
d C
hief
Fin
anci
al O
ffice
r D
eput
y S
uper
inte
nden
t D
istri
ct/S
choo
l Ope
ratio
ns
Ass
ista
nt S
uper
inte
nden
t H
uman
Res
ourc
es,
Rec
ruitm
ent a
nd
Per
form
ance
Man
agem
ent
Sup
erin
tend
ent
of S
choo
ls
APPENDIX B
SURVEY
APPENDIX C
RESEARCH
The Four Pillars of Student Achievement Miami-Dade County Public Schools Strategic Plan
Student, Parent, and Community Engagement The Miami-Dade County Public Schools (M-DCPS) 2009-14 Strategic Plan considers Student, Parent, and Community Engagement as one of the four pillars supporting student achievement by enhancing student, parent, and community understanding, awareness, and support for the schools and the District. Research has shown a consistent, positive relationship between parents' engagement in their children's education and student outcomes such as higher academic achievement, and lower dropout and truancy rates. (Dauber & Epstein 1993; Epstein 2001; Grolnick, Benjet, Kurowski, & Apostoleris 1997). Epstein (2001) argued that family, school, and community are important "spheres of influence" on children's development and that a child's educational development is enhanced when these three environments work collaboratively toward shared goals. Schools should create greater "overlap" between the school, home, and community by implementing activities across six types of involvement. Specifically: 1) Parenting, 2) communication, 3) volunteering, 4) learning at home, 5) decision-making, and 6) collaboration with the community. The focus of further research is on two significant issues: Why parents do and do not get involved in their children's education and what role do schools and teachers play in creating parental involvement? Catsambis and Beveridge (2001) and Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler (1995, 1997) find that working-class families and families in which mothers work full-time tend to be less involved in their children's education. Also, parents of elementary school students tend to be more involved in their children's education than parents of older students. Dauber and Epstein (1993) found that school and teacher practices were the strongest predictors in getting parents and family members involved in students' education. Community engagement may be more a function of school willingness to engage those resources. Several studies reported that schools have a wide range of community resources available to them but the majority of schools do not reach out to them. (Sanders , 2001). Finally, research has shown that schools and teachers' attitudes, as well as family resources, can be important obstacles to parental and community involvement. One approach to overcoming these obstacles is to increase the degree to which teacher and principal training programs (formal and informal) cover the topic of the importance of parental involvement and how to facilitate it. (Sanders, 2001; Epstein & Saunders 2000; Grolnick & Slowiaczek, 1994). Financial Efficiency/Stability Miami-Dade County Public Schools relies on two main sources of funding provided by the state and allocated to school districts primarily based on student population and highly visible School Board levied property taxes. In addition, Federal funds are provided through various grant programs and Title I funds. The appropriate use of this funding is a key pillar of the District’s 2009-2014 Strategic Plan.
Financial efficiency, assuring that funds are spent wisely and financial stability, and assuring that funding can be maintained from one year to the next enable all personnel to focus on the purpose of the District, which is to promote the maximum levels of achievement for all students. According to Timothy A. Hacsi, in his book, “Children as Pawns: The Politics of Educational Reform,” (Hasci, 2002) there are two primary questions about school finance. The first is whether the “amount of money a school has in its budget affects student achievement” and secondly, “How much is required for an ‘adequate’ education?” He goes on to state that of course money matters because it is essential for schools to have funding, but the question that is not clear is how much is required for an adequate education. It is really the latter question that is the focus of much debate since hypothetically a district that spends only a few hundred dollars per student versus a district that spends tens of thousands of dollars per student would have vastly different outcomes. Another aspect of a district’s financial status is how it affects the relationship between School Boards, Superintendents, and the Communities they serve. When finances are not stable and real or perceived inefficiencies occur, the focus on student achievement is lost amidst the crumbling relations between these three entities. M-DCPS finances require careful stewardship in light of the difficult economic conditions facing the nation and the State of Florida. A report prepared by the Research Services group of M-DCPS examined how the economic downturn has led to cost cutting at schools across the nation (Research Services, Information Capsule 2008). This report catalogues many strategies being implemented by districts to reduce costs, and several of these are represented in this Strategic Plan. For example, districts are reducing spending on supplies and equipment, altering health insurance programs, cutting energy costs, reducing employee hours, fundraising, applying for grants, developing corporate support, and accepting corporate advertising. The two concepts of Return on Investment (ROI) and Values-Based Budgets included in the Strategic Plan are both supported and enabled by a stable financial environment. ROI is a management tool that examines the degree to which costs incurred in any activity are reflected in positive dollar outcomes exceeding those costs. This is accomplished through appropriate data collection and evaluation which enable the calculation of outcome minus costs. (Phillips, 1997). The Districts’ Strategic Plan objectives to reduce our carbon foot print and to decrease medical insurance costs are examples of efforts that can provide a measurable return on investment. Values-based budgeting grows out of a way to prioritize projects from the engineering and business world and is described by Merkhofer (1995) as multi-attribute utility analysis (MUA) which he says focuses on organizations “making decisions driven by the values of its citizens.” Referring to the work of Ralph Keeney who has promoted “Value Focused Thinking,” he says “that focusing on values leads to choices that produce more desirable consequences.” The MUA model for values-based budgeting consists of defining decision objectives, performance measures, and weights that determine the willingness (importance) of each objective. This process encourages out-of-the-box thinking and provides a consensus-based objective/budget. This approach would facilitate the Strategic Plans’ objectives of flexibility and transparency. Education Miami-Dade County Public Schools continuously develops new and creative initiatives for educating our students. The District’s educational plans are developed based on reviews of the existing research literature. Every year our educators examine a myriad of issues that impact education to come up with solutions. In the recent past, the effects of many factors that impact student performance have been examined, such as poverty (Blazer & Romanik, 2009), student
mobility (Froman, 2007), and class size (Romanik, 2003). Similarly, formal evaluations have assessed the effectiveness of M-DCPS programs impacting the areas of curriculum (Abella, 2007a; Arcia, 2009; Arcia, et al. 2007), support services (Abella, 2008), bilingual education (Shneyderman, 2007; Nichols-Lopez, 2008), and school reform (Abella, 2007b; Abella, 2007c; Abella, 2009; Sorhaindo & Urdegar, 2006), There is a constant effort to discern the best way to select (Blazer, 2009a), train (Blazer, 2005a), and motivate teachers and school administrators (Blazer, 2005b). In sum, the efforts to rethink the way education is provided are constant and include consideration of many innovative educational initiatives such as virtual schools (Blazer, 2009b), alternative pathways to diplomas (Blazer & Romanik, 2007a), extended day schools (Blazer, 2008), and single-gender schools (Blazer, 2006b). The Strategic Plan 2009-2014 proposes the introduction of several programs designed to extend the reach of education both in terms of time and distance. Research has shown that wider exposure to instruction generates benefits for students (Silva, 2007). Consequently, M-DCPS has introduced the Links to Learning initiative which extends the school day by allowing students to access school work through their computers at home. In addition, the availability of educational content via internet courses is being expanded as part of the Virtual School Programs. In general, research into the best techniques for providing students with vocabulary (Blazer & Romanik, 2007b), mathematics (Blazer, 2004a), reading (Gomez, 2004; Shneyderman, 2006), and science instruction (Blazer, 2004c) is always ongoing and informs all efforts to enhance the educational experience of M-DCPS students. School/District Leadership The District’s Strategic Plan recognizes the integral role of leadership in promoting student achievement. Leadership and leadership development are supported throughout the life cycles of all stakeholders to this process. Diversity is encouraged in terms of experience, culture, and background because such variability makes organizations more adaptable, provides for a wider array of viewpoints, and affords a greater level of synergy (Greenberg, 2005, January 4). Emergent leaders are recruited as students in career training and internship programs. The model initiative used by the district in this area is Teach for America, which “recruits outstanding recent college graduates from all backgrounds and career interests who commit to teach for two years in urban and rural public schools. Through diverse, non-traditional backgrounds, Teach for America teachers infuse new ideas and initiatives into their schools” (Office of the Superintendent, 2009, p.30). Cross-training is encouraged in order to facilitate movement between career ladders in which teachers are offered the choice of progressing as mentor/master teachers, honing their expertise in particular subject areas, or moving into administrative positions in which they train for the school principalship and learn the art of budgeting and management. Paraprofessionals are also given the opportunity to progress into teaching. Research has shown that such career ladders promote retention and improve job satisfaction (Shen, 1997) and the retention of quality employees has been found to be associated with student achievement (Hanushek, Kain, & Rivkin, 2004). Cross-training is achieved through initiatives that give instructional employees management experiences and that offer administrative experiences to instructional employees. Everybody Teaches and Educators in Residence are two district-developed initiatives designed to accomplish cross training. “Everybody Teaches leverages non-school site employees to assist in the delivery of instruction . . . [provides] additional exposure to students and classroom instruction . . . [and] helps to refocus and reprioritize current duties” (Office of the Superintendent, p. 29). “Educators in Residency [conversely operates] by . . . training the District’s next generation of leaders and by
providing opportunities for select staff to participate in Cabinet-level decision making” (p. 32). These leadership development initiatives enhance the accumulation of institutional knowledge. The process of Knowledge Capture enables institutions to better employ best practices; codify, classify, and archive information; and apply formative feedback strategies (O’Hara & Shadbolt, 2002). The model initiative used by the district to facilitate this process is Enterprise Resource Planning, which enhances/streamlines current work processes to achieve maximal efficiency and effectiveness in order to “provide a context for human capital decisions that were previously difficult to attain” (Office of the Superintendent, p. 31). This comprehensive system is geared toward an overall instructional focus, which is the hallmark of effective schools (Lezotte, 1984) and actualized through a shared value system under girded by structured policy initiatives that support rigorous accountability. Schools and districts that manifest such Instructional Program Coherence have been found to experience higher levels of student achievement (Newmann, et al., 2001).
References
Student, Parent, and Community Engagement Catsambis, Sophia, and Beveridge, Andrew. 2001. "Does Neighborhood Matter? Family,
Neighborhood, and School Influences On Eighth-Grade Mathematics Achievement." Sociological Focus.
Dauber, Susan L., and Epstein, Joyce L. 1993. "Parents' Attitudes and Practices Of Involvement In Inner-City Elementary And Middle Schools." In Families and Schools in A Pluralistic Society, Ed. Nancy F. Chavkin. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Epstein, Joyce L. 2001. School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, Co: Westview.
Grolnick, Wendy S.; Benjet, Corina; Kurowski, Carolyn O.; and Apostoleris, Nicholas H.1997. "Predictors Of Parent Involvement In Children's Schooling." Journal Of Educational Psychology 89:538–548.
Grolnick, Wendy S., and Slowiaczek, Maria L. 1994. "Parents' Involvement in Children's Schooling: A Multidimensional Conceptualization And Motivational Model." Child Development 65:237–252.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why Do Parents Become Involved In Their Children's Education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3-42 Ej548327.
Hoover-Dempsey, Kathleen V., and Sandler, Howard M. 1995. "Parent Involvement In Children's Education: Why Does It Make A Difference?" Teachers College Record 97:310–331.
Epstein, J. L., & Sanders, M. G. (2000).Connecting Home, School And Community: New Directions For Social Research. In M. T. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook Of The Sociology Of Education (Pp. 285 - 306), New York, Ny: Kluwer Academic
Epstein, Joyce L. 2001. School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, Co: Westview.
Sanders, Mavis G. 2001. "The Role Of 'Community' In Comprehensive School, Family, And Community Partnerships." Elementary School Journal 102:19–34.
Chavkin, Nancy F., Ed. 1993. Families and Schools in a Pluralistic Society. Albany: State University Of New York Press.
Chrispeels, J. H., & Rivero, E. (2000). Engaging Latino Families for Student Success: Understanding The Process And Impact Of Providing Training To Parents. Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La.
Clark, R. (1993). Homework-Focused Parenting Practices that Positively Affect Student Achievement. In N. F Chavkin (Ed.), Families And Schools In A Pluralistic Society (Pp. 85-105), Albany, NY: State University Of New York.
Epstein, Joyce L. 1995. "School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring For the Children We Share." Phi Delta Kappan 76:701–712.
Epstein, Joyce L., and Dauber, Susan L. 1991. "School Programs and Teacher Practices Of Parent Involvement In Inner-City Elementary And Middle Schools." Elementary School Journal 91:289–305.
Fine, Michelle. 1993. “Parent Involvement: Reflections on Parents, Power, and Urban Public Schools." Teachers College Record 94:682–710.
Mediratta, K., & Fruchter, N., (2001). Mapping The Field Of Organizing For School Improvement: A Report On Education Organizing In Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, The Mississippi Delta, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco, And Washington Dc. New York, Ny: The Institute For Education And Social Policy, New York University.
Mapp, K. L. (2002). Having Their Say: Parents Describe How and Why They Are Involved In
Their Children's Education. Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting Of The American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La.
Shaver, A. V, & Walls, R. T. (1998) Ej561992. Effect Of Title I Parent Involvement On Student Reading And Mathematics Achievement. Journal Of Research And Development In Education, 31(2), 90 - 97.
Westat And Policy Studies Associates. (2001). The Longitudinal Evaluation Of School Change And Performance In Title I Schools. Washington, Dc: U.S. Department Of Education, Office of The Deputy Secretary, Planning And Evaluation Service.
Financial Efficiency/Stability Blazer, C. (2008, November) The economic downturn and how U.S. school districts are cutting
costs. Information Capsule, 0809 (November), 1 – 16. Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Research Services.
Merkhofer, L. (2005, May). Value-Based Budgeting, IG Newsletter, May 2005. Tampa, FL: The Innovation Groups, Retrieved October 27, 2009, from http://www.prioritysystem.com/PDF/IGArticle3.pdf
Phillip, J, (1997) Return on investment in training and improvement programs. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company
Education Abella, R. (2007a). Evaluation of the gifted program. Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public
Schools. Abella, R. (2007b). Follow-up evaluation of the opportunity scholarship program. Miami, FL:
Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Abella, R. (2008). Evaluation of the 2007-08 HIV/AIDS education program. Miami, FL: Miami-
Dade County Public Schools. Abella, R. (2009). Secondary school reform evaluation. Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public
Schools. Arcia, E. (2009). Title I 2007-2008 schools and students served parts a, c, and d of title I, �
improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged.� Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
Arcia, E., Nichols-Lopez, K., Urdegar, S. (2007). Title I evaluation summary report 2005-2006.
Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools Blazer, C. (2004a). Research-based strategies for improving student achievement: Mathematics,
Information Capsule, 0407(November). Retrieved October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0407.pdf
Blazer, C. (2004b). Research-based strategies for improving student achievement: Science,
Information Capsule, 0411(December). Retrieved October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0411.pdf
Blazer, C. (2005a). Professional development for teachers, Information Capsule, 0505
(December). Retrieved October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0505.pdf
Blazer, C. (2005b). Performance pay for administrators, Information Capsule, 0504(November).
Retrieved October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0504.pdf
Blazer, C. (2006a). Performance pay for teachers, Information Capsule, 0508(March). Retrieved
October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0508.pdf Blazer, C. (2006b). Single-gender schooling, Information Capsule, 0506(January). Retrieved
October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0506.pdf Blazer, C. (2008). Extended school days, Information Capsule, 0705(May). Retrieved October 28,
2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0705.pdf Blazer, C. (2009a). How to select the best principals, Information Capsule, 0818(April). Retrieved
October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0818.pdf Blazer, C. (2009b). Virtual schools, Information Capsule, 0817(March). Retrieved October 28, 2009
from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0817.pdf Blazer, C., Romanik, D. (2007a). Differentiated diploma pathways, Information Capsule, 0701
(December). Retrieved October, 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0701.pdf
Blazer, C., Romanik, D. (2007b). Individual differences in vocabulary acquisition, Information
Capsule, 0702(September). Retrieved October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0702.pdf
Blazer, C. & Romanik, D. (2009). The effect of poverty on student achievement, Information Capsule, 0901(July). Retrieved October 28, 2009, from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0901.pdf
Froman, T. (2007). Measuring student mobility�district and zone, Research Brief, 0605(February).
Retrieved October 28, 2009, from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/ResearchBriefs/RB0605.pdf Gomez, J. (2004). Evaluation of the third grade summer reading camps in the summer of 2003.
Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Nichols-Lopez, K. (2008). English language learners and their academic progress: 2005-05 and
2006-07. Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Romanik, D. (2003). What do we know about class size reduction?, Information Capsule,
0202(March). Retrieved October 28, 2009 from, http://drs.dadeschools.net/InformationCapsules/IC0202.pdf
Silva, E (2007). On the clock: rethinking the way schools use time, Education Sector Reports,
January. Retrieved October 28, 2009 from, http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/OntheClock.pdf
Shneyderman, A. (2007). Evaluation of the extended foreign language program final report. Miami,
FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Sorhaindo, L. Urdegar, S. (2006). Evaluation of the school improvement zone year 1: 2004-05. Miami, FL: Miami- Dade County Public Schools. School/District Leadership Greenberg, J. (2005, January 24). Diversity in the workplace: Benefits, challenges and solutions.
Retrieved October 27, 2009, from http://ezinearticles.com/?Diversity--in--the--Workplace:--Benefits,--Challenges--and--Solutions&id=11053
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.A., & Rivkin, S.G. (2004, Winter).The revolving door: A path-breaking study in Texas reveals that working conditions matter more than salary. Education Next. Retrieved May 5, 2007, from http://www.educationnext.org/.
Lezotte, L.A. (1984). School effective research: A tribute to Ron Edmonds. “One perspective of an effective schools research agenda.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 23-27, 1984).
Newman, F.M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A.S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy [Electronic version]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297-321.
O’Hara, K., & Shadbolt, N. (2002). Managing knowledge capture: Economic, technological, and political considerations [Electronic version]. Paper prepared under a grant from the United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/N15764/01). Retrieved October 27, 2009, from http://eprints.aktors.org/44/01/valuation-methods.pdf
Office of the Superintendent (2009). Miami-Dade County Public Schools 2009-14 strategic planning framework. Power Point presentation. Retrieved October 26, 2009, from http://www.dadeschools.net/draftframeworkpackage.ppt.
Purkey, S.C. & Smith, M.S. (1983). Effective schools: A review [Electronic version]. Elementary School Journal, 83 (4), 426 – 452.
Shen, J. (1997). Teacher retention and attrition in the public schools: Evidence from SASS91. Journal of Educational Research, 91 (2), 81-89.
APPENDIX D
Initiative Summaries
1
Wha
t is
it?La
unch
Alu
mni
Out
reac
h Pl
an.
Alu
mni
Eng
agem
ent
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?1.
Dev
elop
tool
kit t
o as
sist
hig
h sc
hool
s in
eng
agin
g al
umni
.
2.D
evel
op d
istr
ict w
eb p
age
for a
lum
ni c
onta
ct in
form
atio
n.
3.Sh
owca
se d
istin
guis
hed
alum
ni o
n di
stric
t web
pag
e.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Supp
orts
pill
ar o
f Stu
dent
, Par
ent a
nd C
omm
unity
Eng
agem
ent.
2
Wha
t is
it?In
crea
se P
aren
t and
Com
mun
ity P
artic
ipat
ion
in A
dvoc
acy
Effo
rts
Par
ent E
ngag
emen
t
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?1.
Supp
ort w
ork
of p
aren
t gro
ups
(i.e.
, PTA
, FC
IAC
, PLC
, and
CPA
gra
duat
es).
a.A
rticu
late
the
Sup
erin
tend
ent’s
vis
ion
to p
aren
ts a
nd m
ake
his
voic
e he
ard
thro
ugho
ut th
e co
mm
unity
.b.
Edu
cate
sta
ff an
d pr
inci
pals
abo
ut th
e im
porta
nce
of p
aren
t inv
olve
men
t and
the
prop
er u
se o
f PTA
fund
s.c.
Sho
wca
se p
aren
t inv
olve
men
t at t
he S
choo
l Boa
rd m
eetin
gs.
d.S
uppo
rt an
effo
rt fo
r par
ents
to m
eet w
ith th
e H
eral
d ed
itoria
l boa
rd.
e.E
valu
ate
the
non-
finan
cial
impa
ct o
f the
elim
inat
ion
of th
e pa
rent
-teac
her c
onfe
renc
es a
nd th
e la
ck o
f ade
quat
e te
ch s
uppo
rt fo
r the
Par
ent P
orta
l.f.
Pla
n qu
arte
rly m
eetin
gs w
ith t
he le
ader
s of
fou
r m
ajor
par
ent
orga
niza
tions
(FC
IAC
, P
TA,
PLC
, an
d Ti
tle I
D
AC
.)
3
Par
ent E
ngag
emen
t
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?2.
Empo
wer
par
ents
thro
ugh
invo
lvem
ent w
ith T
he P
aren
t Aca
dem
y (T
PA).
a.R
evie
w a
nd m
odify
exi
stin
g TP
A c
urric
ula
to id
entif
y ga
ps.
b.Im
plem
ent t
he P
aren
t Pla
n fo
r Suc
cess
in a
t lea
st 3
5 C
orre
ct II
and
Inte
rven
e S
choo
ls o
n a
mon
thly
bas
is.
c.Im
plem
ent o
nlin
e re
gist
ratio
n sy
stem
and
pro
vide
a m
inim
um o
f tw
o on
line
clas
ses.
d.P
artn
er w
ith o
rgan
izat
ions
and
pro
vide
rs to
hos
t a m
inim
um o
f nin
e fa
mily
enr
ichm
ent e
vent
s.e.
Incr
ease
num
ber o
f par
ents
par
ticip
atin
g in
TP
A b
y 15
%.
f.In
crea
se n
umbe
r of s
choo
ls o
fferin
g TP
A w
orks
hops
by
10%
.
3.U
tiliz
e “B
e Th
ere”
conc
ept a
nd m
ater
ials
to p
rom
ote
pare
ntal
invo
lvem
ent.
4.In
crea
se n
umbe
r of V
ery
Invo
lved
Par
ents
(VIP
s) b
y 15
%.
5.Pi
lot G
reat
Sch
ools
“C
olle
ge B
ound
”pr
ogra
m.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Supp
orts
pill
ar o
f Stu
dent
, Par
ent a
nd C
omm
unity
Eng
agem
ent.
4
Wha
t is
it?Ex
pand
Ser
vice
-Lea
rnin
g pr
ojec
ts to
Ele
men
tary
and
Mid
dle
Scho
ol le
vels
.
Stu
dent
Eng
agem
ent
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?1.
Ass
ist s
choo
ls in
sec
urin
g gr
ant o
ppor
tuni
ties
for s
ervi
ce-le
arni
ng.
2.In
crea
se s
ervi
ce-le
arni
ng p
rofe
ssio
nal d
evel
opm
ent o
ppor
tuni
ties
for t
each
ers
thro
ugho
ut c
ount
y.
3.D
evel
op p
artn
ersh
ips
that
sup
port
new
pro
ject
s.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Supp
orts
pill
ar o
f Stu
dent
, Par
ent a
nd C
omm
unity
Eng
agem
ent.
5
Wha
t is
it?In
crea
se U
tiliz
atio
n of
Tec
hnol
ogy
to E
ngag
e C
omm
unity
Mem
bers
.
Eng
agem
ent t
hrou
gh T
echn
olog
y
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?1.
Prov
ide
ongo
ing
supp
ort a
nd tr
aini
ngs
to s
choo
l-site
s fo
r util
izat
ion
of n
ew S
VP re
gist
ratio
n sy
stem
.
2.En
hanc
e O
CS
web
site
to b
e m
ore
user
-frie
ndly
.
3.Pr
ovid
e Pa
rent
Por
tal w
orks
hops
thro
ugh
The
Pare
nt A
cade
my.
4.Es
tabl
ish
onlin
e ne
twor
k of
sch
ool-l
evel
alu
mni
ass
ocia
tion
web
pag
es th
roug
h so
cial
net
wor
king
site
s.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Supp
orts
pill
ar o
f Stu
dent
, Par
ent a
nd C
omm
unity
Eng
agem
ent.
6
Wha
t is
it?Th
e Ed
ucat
iona
l Pla
n is
foun
ded
on th
e fo
llow
ing
thre
e te
nets
:•
Exc
elle
nce:
Eve
ry s
tude
nt is
pro
vide
d w
ith a
wor
ld-c
lass
edu
catio
n•
Equ
ity:
An e
quita
ble
allo
catio
n of
reso
urce
s ba
sed
on s
tude
nt n
eeds
•E
ffici
ency
: U
nifo
rm te
achi
ng s
tand
ards
, hig
h ex
pect
atio
ns, q
ualit
y re
sour
ces,
and
sup
port
Edu
catio
n P
lan
-Ove
rvie
w
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?Th
e Ed
ucat
ion
Plan
pre
sent
s a
mor
e st
ream
lined
and
res
ults
-orie
nted
app
roac
h th
at f
ocus
es o
n al
l te
ache
rs
deliv
erin
g th
e co
re c
urric
ulum
effe
ctiv
ely
so t
hat
expe
ctat
ions
for
wha
t st
uden
ts s
houl
d le
arn
are
cons
iste
nt
acro
ss a
ll sc
hool
s. I
nclu
ded
in th
e Ed
ucat
ion
Plan
is a
n in
stru
ctio
nal a
nd c
urric
ular
too
lkit
that
incl
udes
:•
Inst
ruct
iona
l Pac
ing
Gui
des
and
Focu
s C
alen
dars
alig
n co
ncep
ts, t
opic
s, a
nd s
kills
rel
ated
to a
par
ticul
ar c
onte
nt
area
cur
ricul
um t
hat a
re to
be
addr
esse
d in
a d
efin
ed s
eque
nced
perio
d of
tim
e•
Acad
emic
Inte
rven
tions
pro
vide
sup
plem
enta
ry le
arni
ng in
sup
port
of c
ore
acad
emic
sub
ject
s, e
.g. R
eadi
ng, M
ath
and
Scie
nce
•Pl
an f
or M
onito
ring
Stud
ent
Pro
gres
s pr
ovid
es g
uida
nce
for
track
ing
and
gaug
ing
prog
ress
usi
ng b
oth
form
ativ
e an
d su
mm
ativ
e m
easu
res
•Ti
ered
Aca
dem
ic S
uppo
rt fo
r S
choo
ls o
utlin
es a
sys
tem
atic
pla
n fo
r pr
ovis
ion
of d
iffer
entia
ted
supp
ort
and
assi
stan
ce
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
The
Educ
atio
n Pl
an p
rovi
des
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
, con
sist
ent,
and
coor
dina
ted
appr
oach
to
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
th
e cu
rric
ulum
acr
oss
all
scho
ols.
It
leve
rage
s th
e co
llegi
al e
ffort
s of
Dis
tric
t, R
egio
n, a
nd s
choo
l-lev
el
adm
inis
trat
ors
and
supp
ort
pers
onne
l to
ensu
re t
hat
Mia
mi-D
ade
Cou
nty
Publ
ic S
choo
ls d
eliv
ers
a w
orld
-cla
ss
curr
icul
um to
eac
h an
d ev
ery
stud
ent m
eetin
g th
e St
rate
gic
Plan
of “
One
Goa
l of S
tude
nt A
chie
vem
ent”
for
the
Dis
tric
t in
2009
-201
0.
7
Wha
t is
it?Th
e M
iam
i Edi
son
Edu-
Plex
is a
200
9-20
10 in
itiat
ive
that
:•
infu
ses
a gl
obal
focu
s in
to a
ll as
pect
s of
Edi
son
educ
atio
n;•
impl
emen
ts a
n ar
ray
of ri
goro
us, h
igh-
leve
l aca
dem
ic p
rogr
ams;
•in
stills
prid
e an
d sk
ill in
real
izin
g on
e’s
entre
pren
euria
l pot
entia
l and
in s
ervi
ng o
ther
s; a
nd
•in
spire
s th
e jo
y of
inst
illing
dis
cipl
ine
of a
rtist
ic e
xpre
ssio
nto
stim
ulat
e se
lf-un
ders
tand
ing
and
self-
expr
essi
on,
criti
cal
thin
king
, hig
h-le
vel l
earn
ing,
and
pro
blem
-sol
ving
.
Mia
mi E
diso
n E
du-P
lex
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?Th
e cu
rren
t nin
th a
nd te
nth
grad
ers
have
the
oppo
rtun
ity to
sel
ect f
rom
four
aca
dem
ies:
•In
tern
atio
nal S
tudi
es:
Lang
uage
ski
lls a
re p
erfe
cted
by
stud
ents
in o
rder
to b
e fu
lly b
ilingu
al a
nd
trilin
gual
.•
Col
lege
Boa
rd A
cade
my:
C
halle
nges
hig
h ac
hiev
ers
thro
ugh
rigor
ous
cour
sew
ork,
Adv
ance
dP
lace
men
t and
Hon
ors
cour
ses,
in a
ll ac
adem
ic d
isci
plin
es. T
he A
cade
my
can
lead
to th
e at
tain
men
t of c
olle
ge c
redi
ts a
s a
high
sch
ool s
tude
ntth
roug
h D
ual E
nrol
lmen
t.•
Hea
lth a
nd P
ublic
Affa
irs A
cade
my:
Stu
dent
s ap
ply
thei
r kno
wle
dge
of m
ath
and
scie
nce
as th
ey d
evel
op•
Perfo
rmin
g an
d V
isua
l Arts
Aca
dem
y:
Offe
rs s
tude
nts
oppo
rtuni
ties
to e
xpan
d on
the
on th
eir t
alen
ts o
f art,
mus
ic,
danc
e, a
nd fi
lm.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
The
Mia
mi E
diso
n Ed
u-Pl
exco
ntrib
utes
to
the
Stra
tegi
c Fr
amew
ork
of E
duca
tion
by p
rovi
ding
stu
dent
s w
ith a
w
orld
-cla
ss,
wor
ld-th
emed
, w
orld
-focu
sed
educ
atio
n, c
reat
ing
grad
uate
s w
ho a
re i
nven
tors
of
thei
row
n de
stin
ies,
pre
parin
g th
em fo
r suc
cess
in th
e gl
obal
soc
iety
and
mar
ket p
lace
of t
he T
hird
Mill
enni
um.
8
Wha
t is
it?Th
e Su
cces
s A
cade
my
is a
key
com
pone
nt o
f th
e D
istr
ict
stud
ent
perf
orm
ance
enh
ance
men
t in
itiat
ives
to
prov
ide
wee
kly
supp
lem
enta
l aca
dem
ic s
uppo
rt to
stu
dent
s in
low
per
form
ing
scho
ols
in S
atur
day
sess
ions
.
Suc
cess
Aca
dem
y
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?•
Twen
ty h
igh
impa
ct l
esso
ns i
n re
adin
g, m
athe
mat
ics
and
scie
nce
have
bee
n de
velo
ped
for
use
in S
atur
day
sess
ions
to
be c
ondu
cted
at
all
scho
ols
desi
gnat
ed a
s In
terv
ene
and
Cor
rect
II
acco
rdin
g to
the
FLD
OE
Diff
eren
tiate
d A
ccou
ntab
ility
requ
irem
ents
.
•A
cade
my
sess
ions
are
str
uctu
red
to e
nsur
e fid
elity
of
inst
ruct
ion
and
cons
iste
ncy
of le
sson
del
iver
y th
roug
h ta
rget
ed o
n-si
te s
uppo
rt a
nd m
onito
ring.
•In
stru
ctio
nal
supp
ort
prov
ided
to
Sa
turd
ay
Aca
dem
y fa
culty
in
clud
es
unifo
rm
less
ons,
re
view
an
d de
mon
stra
tion
of le
sson
pla
ns p
rior
to le
sson
del
iver
y, d
ebrie
fing
sess
ions
follo
win
g th
e le
sson
s an
d on
goin
g pr
ofes
sion
al d
evel
opm
ent f
or fa
culty
invo
lved
.
•Po
dcas
ts o
f the
less
on d
eliv
ery
will
be
avai
labl
e to
all
M-D
CPS
sch
ools
.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
The
Succ
ess
Aca
dem
y al
igns
to th
e St
rate
gic
Fram
ewor
k of
Edu
catio
n by
pro
vidi
ng a
ctiv
ities
and
func
tions
that
en
hanc
e st
uden
t aca
dem
ic a
chie
vem
ent.
9
Wha
t is
it?Sp
ecia
l pro
gram
s an
d ev
ents
whi
ch p
rovi
de o
ppor
tuni
ties
for s
tude
nts
to:
•en
rich
and
enha
nce
thei
r edu
catio
nal e
xper
ienc
es;
•ex
tend
thei
r lea
rnin
g be
yond
the
clas
sroo
m;
•ex
plor
e ar
eas
of in
tere
st; a
nd•
show
case
thei
r tal
ents
and
abi
litie
s.
Cul
tura
l Lite
racy
Initi
ativ
es
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?•
Cul
tura
l Pas
spor
t:P
rovi
des
a cu
ltura
l fie
ld e
xper
ienc
e fo
r all
stud
ents
K-1
2 ea
ch y
ear.
•B
enef
it C
once
rt:
Opp
ortu
nity
for s
tude
nts
and
scho
ol p
erso
nnel
to s
how
case
thei
r tal
ent.
•O
lym
pic
Day
:P
rovi
des
inno
vativ
e op
portu
nitie
s to
enh
ance
phy
sica
l, m
oral
, and
aca
dem
icde
velo
pmen
t of a
ll s
tude
nts,
est
ablis
hes
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
aca
dem
ic c
urric
ulum
base
d on
col
labo
rativ
e re
sear
ch e
fforts
whi
ch e
xplo
re b
est p
ract
ices
, and
ena
bles
stud
ents
the
oppo
rtuni
ty to
reac
h th
eir f
ulle
st h
uman
pot
entia
l thr
ough
inno
vativ
e sp
ort o
ppor
tuni
ties
and
educ
atio
nal p
rogr
ams.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
The
Cul
tura
l Lite
racy
Initi
ativ
es c
ontr
ibut
e to
the
Stra
tegi
c Fr
amew
ork
of E
duca
tion
by im
prov
ing
and
expa
ndin
g cu
rric
ulum
and
incr
easi
ng e
nric
hmen
t opp
ortu
nitie
s fo
r all
stud
ents
and
sta
ff.
10
Wha
t is
it?Li
nks
to L
earn
ing
prov
ides
stu
dent
s w
ith c
usto
m l
earn
ing
path
s in
dis
tric
t-lic
ense
d so
ftwar
e ap
plic
atio
ns f
or
rem
edia
tion
and
enric
hmen
t pur
pose
s.
Link
s to
Lea
rnin
g
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?Li
nks
to L
earn
ing
is a
vaila
ble
to s
tude
nts
in g
rade
s 3
-11
acce
ssib
le t
hrou
gh t
he s
tude
nt p
orta
l fo
r us
e af
ter
scho
ol a
nd o
n ho
liday
s an
d w
eeke
nds.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Link
s to
Lea
rnin
g co
ntrib
utes
to th
e st
rate
gic
Plan
by
exte
ndin
gst
uden
t lea
rnin
g be
yond
the
regu
lar
scho
ol d
ay
thro
ugh
the
use
of in
stru
ctio
nal s
oftw
are
whi
ch s
uppo
rts
stud
enta
chie
vem
ent g
oals
.
11
Wha
t is
it?•
Mia
mi D
ade
Onl
ine
Aca
dem
y is
the
dist
rict’s
new
full-
time
onlin
e sc
hool
for s
tude
nts
in g
rade
s K
-12.
•
Mia
mi D
ade
Virt
ual S
choo
l is
the
dist
rict's
est
ablis
hed
part
-tim
e su
pple
men
tal p
rogr
am fo
r stu
dent
s in
gra
des
9-12
.
Virt
ual S
choo
l Pro
gram
s
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?M
iam
i Dad
e O
nlin
e A
cade
my
–St
uden
ts m
ust c
ompl
ete
a C
hoic
e A
pplic
atio
n in
ord
er to
obt
ain
plac
emen
t for
the
2010
-11
scho
ol y
ear.
Mia
mi D
ade
Virt
ual-
Inte
rest
ed h
igh
scho
ol s
tude
nts
can
acce
ss c
ours
e in
form
atio
n an
d re
gist
er a
t http
://m
dvs.
dade
scho
ol.n
et/
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Bot
h pr
ogra
ms
offe
r stu
dent
s th
e op
port
unity
to u
tiliz
e di
stan
cele
arni
ng to
mee
t edu
catio
nal g
oals
.
12
Wha
t is
it?In
nova
tive,
dua
l lan
guag
e, d
emon
stra
tion,
com
mut
er s
choo
l led
by
the
Sup
erin
tend
ent
of S
choo
ls a
nd h
ouse
d at
the
Scho
ol B
oard
hea
dqua
rter
s. T
he p
urpo
se o
f the
PLC
is to
pro
vide
hig
h qu
ality
prim
ary
lear
ning
ser
vice
s an
d st
aff d
evel
opm
ent o
ppor
tuni
ties
for t
each
ers
and
adm
inis
trat
ors.
M-D
CP
S P
rimar
y Le
arni
ng C
ente
r
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?U
nder
the
day
to
day
oper
atio
ns o
f th
e D
ivis
ion
of E
arly
Chi
ldho
od p
rogr
ams,
the
MD
CPS
PLC
will
ser
ve
stud
ents
in
grad
es P
re-K
inde
rgar
ten
thro
ugh
seco
nd g
rade
. T
he m
issi
on o
f th
e PL
C i
s to
cont
inue
the
bes
t re
sear
ch a
nd p
ract
ice
in l
earn
ing
and
teac
hing
, fr
om a
ran
ge o
f na
tiona
l m
odel
s; d
esig
ned
to p
rovi
de a
co
mpr
ehen
sive
and
bal
ance
d cu
rric
ulum
.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Stud
ents
par
ticip
atio
n in
the
M-D
CPS
PLC
will
tea
ch y
oung
chi
ldre
n to
rel
ate
the
prog
ram
of
stud
y to
the
re
aliti
es o
f th
e w
orld
out
side
the
sch
ool
and
will
ser
ve t
o en
hanc
e st
uden
t ac
adem
ic o
ppor
tuni
ties
and
achi
evem
ent.
Wha
t is
it?A
dem
onst
ratio
n si
te s
choo
l cre
ated
to a
ddre
ss th
e co
mpl
ex n
eeds
of s
tude
nts
with
Aut
ism
Spe
ctru
m D
isor
ders
, th
eir f
amili
es, a
nd th
e pr
ofes
sion
als
wor
king
with
them
.
Blu
e La
kes
Aut
ism
Aca
dem
y
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?In
200
9-10
a t
wo
trac
k pr
ogra
m p
rovi
ding
bot
h in
clus
ive
and
sepa
rate
set
tings
for
pre
kind
erga
rten
and
K
inde
rgar
ten
stud
ents
will
be
impl
emen
ted.
B
y 20
10-1
1 th
e A
cade
my
will
ser
ve P
re K
thr
ough
gra
de l
evel
5
stud
ents
. Th
e A
cade
my
will
ser
ve a
s a
rese
arch
, dem
onst
ratio
n an
d tr
aini
ng s
ite t
o ad
apt
new
res
earc
h ba
sed
met
hods
and
tec
hnol
ogie
s th
at h
ave
show
n hi
gh y
ield
res
ults
with
stud
ents
with
Aut
ism
Spe
ctru
m D
isor
ders
. A
noth
er k
ey f
eatu
re o
f th
e A
cade
my
is t
he P
aren
t A
uxili
ary
Cen
ter
esta
blis
hed
to p
rovi
de p
aren
t ed
ucat
ion,
fa
mily
sup
port
gro
ups
to i
nclu
de p
aren
ts,
gran
dpar
ents
and
sib
lings
and
acc
ess
to t
he a
ssis
tive
tech
nolo
gy
lend
ing
libra
ry.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
The
Blu
e La
kes
Aut
ism
A
cade
my
will
de
velo
p st
uden
ts
part
icul
arly
in
the
area
s of
so
cial
sk
ills
and
com
mun
icat
ion
thus
enh
anci
ng t
he l
earn
ing
pote
ntia
l an
d ac
hiev
emen
t of
enr
olle
d st
uden
ts.
Add
ition
ally
, th
roug
h th
e Pa
rent
Aux
iliar
y C
ente
r fa
mili
es w
ill b
e ac
tivel
y en
gage
d in
sup
port
of
stud
ent
achi
evem
ent.
St
reng
then
ing
the
capa
city
of t
he p
rofe
ssio
nals
that
wor
k w
ith s
tude
nts
with
Aut
ism
Spe
ctru
m D
isor
ders
will
be
real
ized
thro
ugh
the
on-s
ite d
emon
stra
tion
and
trai
ning
pro
vide
d to
M-D
CPS
pro
fess
iona
ls.
13
Wha
t is
it?In
stru
ctio
nal
prog
ram
s th
at e
nabl
e ci
tizen
s liv
ing
in m
ultil
ingu
al s
ocie
ties
to i
nter
act
usin
g a
num
ber
of
lang
uage
s ac
ross
ling
uist
ic a
nd c
ultu
ral b
ound
arie
s.
Mul
tilin
gual
Edu
catio
n
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?A
var
iety
of m
odel
s ar
e us
ed th
at ta
ke in
to c
onsi
dera
tion
the
need
s of
the
stud
ents
and
the
com
mun
ity.
In o
rder
to
incr
ease
the
wor
ld la
ngua
ge p
rofic
ienc
y le
vels
of
stud
ents
, M-D
CPS
sch
ools
offe
r du
al l
angu
age
prog
ram
s w
here
stu
dent
s re
ceiv
e w
orld
lan
guag
e an
d co
nten
t ar
ea in
stru
ctio
n in
the
tar
get
lang
uage
fro
m o
ne t
o th
ree
hour
s da
ily.
Thr
ee t
ypes
of
prog
ram
s ar
e in
clud
ed u
nder
the
dua
l la
ngua
ge h
eadi
ng:
Ext
ende
d Fo
reig
n La
ngua
ge (E
FL),
Bili
ngua
l Sch
ool O
rgan
izat
ion
(BIS
O) a
nd In
tern
atio
nal S
tudi
es (I
S).
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Mul
tilin
gual
Edu
catio
n pr
ogra
ms
prov
ide
activ
ities
and
fun
ctio
nsth
at e
nhan
ce s
tude
nt a
cade
mic
ach
ieve
men
t an
d in
crea
se g
loba
l aw
aren
ess.
14
Wha
t is
it?Pr
ovid
ing
just
-in-ti
me
prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
t to
supp
ort t
he d
eliv
ery
of S
atur
day
Succ
ess
Aca
dem
y le
sson
s an
d ke
y be
nchm
arks
.
Pro
fess
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t: Le
arni
ng o
n Th
e G
o
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?
Podc
asts
are
bei
ng d
evel
oped
cov
erin
g K
-12
benc
hmar
ks i
n re
adin
g, m
athe
mat
ics,
and
sci
ence
tha
t w
ill b
e ac
cess
ible
to
all t
each
ers,
any
tim
e, a
ny w
here
. In
add
ition
, sel
ecte
d D
iffer
entia
ted
Acc
ount
abili
ty s
choo
ls w
ill
have
tea
cher
s an
d st
uden
ts t
rain
ed in
dev
elop
ing
podc
asts
as
a m
echa
nism
for
fac
ilita
ting
self-
pace
d le
arni
ng
and
fost
erin
g cr
eativ
ity a
nd e
ngag
emen
t in
lear
ning
. Lea
rnin
g on
the
GO
la
unch
es th
e D
istr
ict’s
invo
lvem
ent i
n th
e St
ate’
s IT
unes
Uni
vers
ity in
itiat
ive.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Th
e po
dcas
ts, i
n ad
ditio
n to
the
dist
rict d
evel
oped
less
ons,
will
ass
ist t
each
ers
in d
eliv
erin
g m
ore
targ
eted
and
ef
fect
ive
inst
ruct
ion
with
the
ulti
mat
e go
al o
f in
crea
sed
stud
ent
achi
evem
ent.
Pod
cast
s w
ill p
rovi
de g
reat
er
oppo
rtun
ity a
nd f
lexi
bilit
y in
del
iver
ing
high
qua
lity
prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
t t
hat
dire
ctly
sup
port
s th
e in
stru
ctio
nal n
eeds
of o
ur s
tude
nts.
15
Wha
t is
it?“E
very
body
Tea
ches
”(E
T) w
ill le
vera
ge n
on-s
choo
l site
em
ploy
ees
to a
ssis
t in
the
deliv
ery
of in
stru
ctio
n to
our
st
uden
ts.
Eve
rybo
dy T
each
es
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?D
epen
ding
upo
n te
achi
ng c
ertif
icat
ion,
edu
catio
nal
back
grou
nd,
and/
or p
artic
ipat
ion
pref
eren
ces,
non
-sch
ool
site
em
ploy
ees
will
ser
ve in
one
or m
ore
of th
e fo
llow
ing
role
s:•
Cla
ssro
om te
ache
rs to
teac
h or
co-
teac
h an
exi
stin
g le
sson
pla
n•
Teac
hers
who
par
ticip
ate
in S
atur
day’
s “S
ucce
ss A
cade
mie
s”•
Visi
ting
prof
esso
rs o
r gue
st s
peak
ers
who
inte
rtwin
e an
out
side
less
on in
to a
n ex
istin
g cu
rricu
lum
•Tu
tors
and
men
tors
who
wor
k w
ith in
divi
dual
stu
dent
s or
gro
ups
of s
tude
nts
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Scho
ol a
nd D
istr
ict L
eade
rshi
p sk
ill s
ets
are
enha
nced
thro
ugh:
•Ad
ditio
nal e
xpos
ure
to s
tude
nts
and
clas
sroo
m in
stru
ctio
n w
hich
hel
ps to
refo
cus
and
repr
iorit
ize
curre
nt d
utie
s•
Col
labo
ratio
n w
ith s
choo
l-site
sta
ff th
at c
an s
erve
as
a sp
ringb
oard
for n
ew id
eas
and
futu
re in
itiat
ives
16
Wha
t is
it?Te
ach
for
Am
eric
a (T
FA)
recr
uits
out
stan
ding
rec
ent
colle
ge g
radu
ates
fro
m a
ll ba
ckgr
ound
s an
d ca
reer
in
tere
sts
who
com
mit
to te
ach
for t
wo
year
s in
urb
an a
nd ru
ral p
ublic
sch
ools
Teac
h fo
r Am
eric
a
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?TF
A a
nd M
-DC
PS r
ecen
tly s
igne
d a
new
3-y
ear
cont
ract
to p
lace
cor
ps m
embe
rs in
our
har
dest
-to-s
taff
scho
ols
and
subj
ect
area
s.
Add
ition
ally
, TF
A a
nd M
-DC
PS a
re l
ooki
ng t
o in
nova
te n
ew a
ppro
ache
s on
how
to
best
de
ploy
thes
e ne
w te
ache
rs, h
ow to
str
ateg
ical
ly g
row
the
prog
ram
, and
how
to e
nhan
ce th
e pr
ogra
m to
mee
t the
D
istr
ict’s
spe
cific
nee
ds.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Thro
ugh
dive
rse,
non
-trad
ition
al b
ackg
roun
ds, T
FA te
ache
rs in
fuse
new
idea
s an
d in
itiat
ives
into
thei
r sc
hool
s.
Afte
r fu
lfilli
ng t
heir
2-ye
ar c
omm
itmen
t, m
any
of t
hese
ind
ivid
uals
sta
y in
Mia
mi-D
ade
Cou
nty
and
cont
inue
te
achi
ng o
r pro
ceed
into
oth
er e
duca
tiona
l lea
ders
hip
role
s.
17
Wha
t is
it?En
terp
rise
Res
ourc
e Pl
anni
ng
(ER
P)
cons
ists
of
im
plem
entin
g a
new
SA
P te
chno
logy
pl
atfo
rm
and
enha
ncin
g/st
ream
linin
g ou
r cur
rent
wor
k pr
oces
ses
to b
ecom
e m
ore
a m
ore
effic
ient
and
effe
ctiv
e or
gani
zatio
n.
Ent
erpr
ise
Res
ourc
e P
lann
ing
and
Pro
cess
Enh
ance
men
ts
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?ER
P im
plem
enta
tions
will
be
rele
ased
in s
tage
s, w
ith th
e fir
st H
R m
odul
e of
e-R
ecru
iting
goi
ng li
ve in
Nov
embe
r 20
09.
The
rem
aini
ng H
R-r
elat
ed m
odul
es w
ill b
e re
leas
ed a
s a
coho
rt i
n Ju
ly 2
010.
T
o su
pple
men
t th
e ne
w
tech
nolo
gy a
nd b
ecom
e m
ore
cust
omer
-orie
nted
, HR
is r
edev
elop
ing
its c
urre
nt w
ebsi
te, c
reat
ing
an e
mpl
oyee
se
rvic
e ce
nter
, and
revi
ewin
g al
l job
des
crip
tions
.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
The
new
tech
nolo
gy, i
n ac
cord
ance
with
upd
ated
wor
k pr
oces
ses,
will
:•
Allo
w p
rosp
ectiv
e em
ploy
ees
to a
pply
and
get
hire
d in
to o
ur o
rgan
izat
ion
thro
ugh
a fa
ster
, aut
omat
ed p
roce
ss; t
his
will
prov
ide
a la
rger
poo
l of a
pplic
ants
for u
s to
recr
uit a
nd s
elec
t our
nex
t gen
erat
ion
of le
ader
s•
Allo
w c
urre
nt s
taff
to c
aptu
re a
nd u
tiliz
e m
ore
empl
oyee
, hi
ring
and
sepa
ratio
n da
ta;
this
will
prov
ide
a co
ntex
t fo
r hu
man
cap
ital d
ecis
ions
that
was
pre
viou
sly
diffi
cult
to a
ttain
.
18
Wha
t is
it?Th
e Ed
ucat
ors
in R
esid
ency
pro
gram
will
hel
p tr
ain
the
Dis
tric
t’s n
ext
gene
ratio
n of
lea
ders
by
prov
idin
g op
port
uniti
es fo
r sel
ect s
taff
to p
artic
ipat
e in
Cab
inet
-leve
l dec
isio
n m
akin
g an
d ex
perie
nce
mul
tiple
are
as w
ithin
th
e or
gani
zatio
n.
Edu
cato
rs in
Res
iden
cy
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?O
ver
the
cour
se o
f th
e sc
hool
yea
r, ap
prox
imat
ely
15 D
istr
ict
empl
oyee
s w
ill p
artic
ipat
e in
thi
s pr
ogra
m.
All
part
icip
ants
will
be
aske
d to
atte
nd C
abin
et-le
vel m
eetin
gs a
nd r
elat
ed e
vent
s.
Con
curr
ently
, eac
h pa
rtic
ipan
t ha
s be
en p
rovi
ded
a un
ique
resi
denc
y ex
perie
nce
that
is ta
ilore
dto
thei
r pro
fess
iona
l bac
kgro
und
and
skill
set
s
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
The
Educ
ator
s in
R
esid
ency
pr
ogra
m
will
he
lp
prov
ide
true
su
cces
sion
m
anag
emen
t fo
r th
e D
istr
ict.
Pa
rtic
ipan
ts h
ave
been
rec
omm
ende
d by
Cab
inet
mem
bers
and
are
pot
entia
lly b
eing
gro
omed
for
hig
h-le
vel
Scho
ol/D
istr
ict p
ositi
ons.
Fur
ther
, thi
s pr
ogra
m s
ets
a to
ne o
fmen
tors
hip
and
prof
essi
onal
gro
wth
that
sho
uld
casc
ade
dow
n th
roug
hout
the
Dis
tric
t.
19
20
Wha
t is
it?
M-D
CPS
will
bui
ld o
ur b
udge
t, as
wel
l as
mak
e al
l our
spe
ndin
g an
din
vest
men
t de
cisi
ons,
in k
eepi
ng w
ith o
ur
core
val
ues.
Val
ues
Bas
ed B
udge
ting
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?•
Con
tinue
pra
ctic
e es
tabl
ishe
d th
is p
ast
year
of
keep
ing
guid
ing
prin
cipl
es a
t th
e ce
nter
of
all b
udge
t-rel
ated
de
cisi
ons.
•In
stitu
tiona
lize
proc
edur
es w
here
by t
he D
istr
ict’s
fin
anci
al in
tegr
ity is
nev
er c
ompr
omis
ed n
or p
itted
aga
inst
th
e in
tegr
ity o
f our
cla
ssro
oms
or o
ur w
orkf
orce
.
•C
onsi
der
the
Ret
urn-
on-In
vest
men
t (R
OI)
of a
ll fin
anci
al d
ecis
ions
and
inv
estm
ents
M-D
CPS
mak
es.
All
“ret
urn”
mus
t be
mea
sure
d in
kee
ping
with
our
val
ues
and
the
Stra
tegi
c Pl
an,
both
of
whi
ch p
ut s
tude
nt
achi
evem
ent a
t its
cor
e.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
This
ini
tiativ
e ai
ms
to e
nsur
e th
at n
o m
atte
r w
hat
deci
sion
s la
yah
ead
–w
heth
er t
hey
be o
f si
mila
r ilk
to
our
rece
nt c
risis
-driv
en e
xpen
ditu
re r
educ
tions
, or
cho
osin
g w
hich
inv
estm
ents
to
mak
e w
ith f
unds
pro
perly
re
serv
ed –
M-D
CPS
will
fac
e th
ose
deci
sion
s w
ith n
o in
tern
al s
trug
gle
over
whe
re o
ur p
riorit
ies
lie. T
here
has
be
en m
uch
talk
ove
r th
e ye
ars
rega
rdin
g m
easu
ring
the
Dis
tric
t’s R
OI,
and
usin
g Va
lues
Bas
ed B
udge
ting
this
ta
sk is
str
aigh
tforw
ard:
our
ret
urn
can
be m
easu
red
sole
ly o
n its
impa
ct o
n st
uden
t ach
ieve
men
t as
defin
ed b
y th
e St
rate
gic
Plan
.
Wha
t is
it?SA
P: a
n En
terp
rise
Res
ourc
e Pl
anni
ng (
ERP)
sof
twar
e th
at w
ill r
epla
ce o
ur c
urre
nt F
inan
cial
and
HR
dat
a sy
stem
s, a
nd c
hang
e m
any
of o
ur c
urre
nt p
roce
dure
s.C
ogno
s: a
bus
ines
s in
telli
genc
e to
ol th
at w
ill c
hang
e th
e w
ay th
is D
istr
ict u
ses
data
thro
ugho
ut th
e or
gani
zatio
n,
as w
ell a
s re
plac
e ou
r out
-dat
ed le
gacy
bud
get s
yste
ms.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
SA
P &
Cog
nos
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?Th
e SA
P im
plem
enta
tion
is o
ne o
f th
e la
rges
t an
d m
ost
com
plex
pro
ject
s M
-DC
PS h
as e
ver
unde
rtak
en. U
sing
in
tern
al a
nd e
xter
nal
pers
onne
l, a
proj
ect
team
has
bee
n fo
rmed
tha
t is
com
mitt
ed t
o ro
lling
out
thi
s ne
w
tech
nolo
gy in
sev
eral
pha
ses
from
late
200
9 th
roug
h th
e en
d of
the
2010
-11
scho
ol y
ear.
The
use
of C
ogno
s fo
r an
alyz
ing
stud
ent a
nd te
ache
r le
vel d
ata
is c
urre
ntly
und
erw
ay a
nd is
rad
ical
ly c
hang
ing
the
way
sch
ool-b
ased
lea
ders
use
dat
a to
driv
e th
e ed
ucat
iona
l pl
ans
for
each
chi
ld.
In a
dditi
on,
Cog
nos
budg
etin
g so
ftwar
e w
ill b
e im
plem
ente
d to
rep
lace
our
sch
ool a
lloca
tion
softw
are
and
entir
e bu
dget
ing
syst
em
prio
r to
the
build
ing
of th
e 20
10-1
1 bu
dget
.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Bot
h SA
P an
d C
ogno
s w
ill n
ot o
nly
crea
te fi
nanc
ial e
ffici
enci
es th
at w
ill fr
ee u
p do
llars
to b
e re
-dire
cted
to
the
clas
sroo
m,
but
will
al
so
grea
tly
impr
ove
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s an
d ef
ficie
ncy
of
our
finan
cial
an
d bu
dget
m
anag
emen
t. A
ll of
the
se e
ffect
s w
ill m
ake
M-D
CPS
a b
ette
r or
gani
zatio
n, o
ne t
hat
can
mor
e cl
early
foc
us it
s re
sour
ces
on im
prov
ing
stud
ent a
chie
vem
ent.
21
Wha
t is
it?
Car
bon
Foot
prin
t is
the
sum
tota
l of G
hG(G
reen
hous
e G
as) a
nd C
O2
emis
sion
s, p
rodu
ced
over
the
life
cycl
e of
a
prod
uct o
r ser
vice
pur
chas
ed a
nd/o
r con
sum
ed d
urin
g an
y on
e ye
ar b
y an
y on
e en
tity.
As
the
larg
est e
mpl
oyer
w
ith th
e la
rges
t tra
nspo
rtat
ion
fleet
and
larg
est f
ood
serv
ice
coun
tyw
ide,
the
Dis
tric
t is
extr
emel
y w
ell p
ositi
oned
to
tak
e a
big
bite
out
of
its C
arbo
n Fo
otpr
int
thro
ugh
redu
ced
cons
umpt
ion,
res
ourc
e re
use
and
impr
oved
pr
actic
es in
key
ope
ratio
nal a
reas
, ran
ging
from
ene
rgy
and
wat
er, t
o al
tern
ativ
e fu
els,
to
‘gre
en’b
uild
ings
and
pr
ocur
emen
t of ‘
gree
n’pr
oduc
ts .
Red
uctio
n of
our
Car
bon
Foot
prin
t
1)a
redu
ctio
n in
the
Dis
trict
’s o
vera
ll en
ergy
and
wat
er c
onsu
mpt
ion
by a
n av
erag
e of
15%
, as
com
pare
d to
FY
‘08-
’09,
w
hich
will
yiel
d an
est
imat
ed c
ost s
avin
gs to
the
Dis
trict
of a
ppro
xim
atel
y $1
2 m
illion
for t
he y
ear;
2)a
redu
ctio
n of
at
leas
t 15
% i
n al
l ex
pens
es a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith p
rinte
rs,
ink
cartr
idge
s/ t
oner
s an
d pa
per
purc
hase
d th
roug
h Pr
ocur
emen
t, w
hich
will
yiel
d an
est
imat
ed $
1.5
milli
on in
sav
ings
to th
e D
istri
ct fo
r the
yea
r; an
d 3)
a re
duct
ion
in th
e D
istri
ct’s
Car
bon
Foot
prin
t of 1
0%, a
s co
mpa
red
to th
e ba
selin
e ye
ar p
erio
d of
’07-
’08/
’08-
’09,
as
a re
sult
of th
ese
and
othe
r sus
tain
able
initi
ativ
es.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Th
is in
itiat
ive
will
con
trib
ute
to o
pera
tiona
l cos
t effi
cien
cies
in th
e D
istr
ict t
hrou
gh:
1)re
duce
d co
nsum
ptio
n an
d th
eref
ore
redu
ced
cost
s;
2)gr
eate
r and
mor
e ef
ficie
nt re
use
of e
xist
ing
reso
urce
s; a
nd
3)a
mor
e co
nsis
tent
app
licat
ion
of (b
est)
sust
aina
ble
prac
tices
toin
form
org
aniz
atio
nal b
ehav
ior.
22
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?FY
‘09-
’10
will
mar
k th
e fir
st p
hase
of a
n on
-goi
ng e
ffort
to d
ecre
ase
the
Dis
tric
t’s G
hGem
issi
ons,
and
ther
efor
e re
duce
the
Dis
tric
t’s C
arbo
n Fo
otpr
int.
Thre
e m
ain
initi
ativ
es h
ave
been
iden
tifie
d fo
r im
plem
enta
tion
in F
Y ‘0
9-’1
0:
Wha
t is
it?St
artin
g w
ith c
alen
dar y
ear 2
010,
M-D
CPS
will
beg
in th
e pr
oces
s of
set
ting
asid
e en
ough
mon
ey in
the
budg
et
each
yea
r to
cove
r all
expe
cted
em
ploy
ee a
nd d
epen
dant
hea
lth in
sura
nce
clai
ms.
Mov
emen
t to
Sel
f-Ins
ured
Pro
gram
How
will
it b
e im
plem
ente
d?•
An
RFP
to s
elec
t an
adm
inis
trat
or o
f our
sel
f-ins
ured
pro
gram
has
alre
ady
take
n pl
ace
and
is c
urre
ntly
in th
e ne
gotia
tion
phas
e.•
M-D
CPS
will
sit
dow
n w
ith a
ll ba
rgai
ning
uni
ts a
nd c
reat
e a
plan
des
ign
that
kee
ps e
xpec
ted
clai
m li
abili
ties
to
a m
anag
eabl
e le
vel w
hile
pro
vidi
ng e
mpl
oyee
s w
ith a
n ac
cept
able
leve
l of c
over
age.
•O
pen
enro
llmen
t will
beg
in a
s so
on a
s po
ssib
le to
ens
ure
a sm
ooth
tran
sitio
n be
ginn
ing
Janu
ary
1, 2
010.
•In
all
year
s go
ing
forw
ard
M-D
CPS
will
ens
ure
it ha
s th
e co
rrec
t lev
el o
f mon
ey s
et a
side
to c
over
the
expe
cted
le
vel o
f cla
ims
and
mak
e an
y ne
cess
ary
adju
stm
ents
.
How
doe
s it
cont
ribut
e to
M-D
CPS
Str
ateg
ic P
lan?
Mov
ing
to a
sel
f-ins
ured
hea
lth in
sura
nce
prog
ram
will
allo
w M
-DC
PS to
man
age
our f
inan
cial
exp
osur
e w
ithou
t ha
ving
to b
uy c
omm
erci
al in
sura
nce.
Thi
s ch
ange
will
impr
ove
the
effic
ienc
y of
our
bus
ines
s op
erat
ions
, and
th
e in
crea
sed
flexi
bilit
y w
ill e
vent
ually
allo
w a
gre
ater
per
cent
age
of o
ur li
mite
d re
sour
ces
to b
e re
dire
cted
to
mor
e di
rect
ly s
uppo
rt s
tude
nt a
chie
vem
ent.
Whi
le a
ll th
e w
hile
per
mitt
ing
M-D
CPS
to c
ontin
ue o
fferin
g w
orld
-cl
ass
heal
th in
sura
nce
whi
ch h
elp
in th
e re
crui
tmen
t of t
op-fl
ight
em
ploy
ees.
23
The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida, adheres to a policy of nondiscrimination in employment and educational programs/activities and programs/activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education, and strives affirmatively to provide equal opportunity for all as required by:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended - prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, or national origin, for programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 - prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended - prohibits discrimination on the basis of age with respect to individuals who are at least 40. The Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended - prohibits sex discrimination in payment of wages to women and men performing substantially equal work in the same establishment. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - prohibits discrimination against the disabled. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) - prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in employment, public service, public accommodations and telecommunications. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) - requires covered employers to provide up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave to "eligible" employees for certain family and medical reasons. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 - prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. Florida Educational Equity Act (FEEA) - prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, gender, national origin, marital status, or handicap against a student or employee. Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 - secures for all individuals within the state freedom from discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status. School Board Rules 6Gx13-4A-1.01, 6Gx13-4A-1.32, and 6Gx13-5D-1.10 - prohibit harassment and/or discrimination against a student or employee on the basis of gender, race, color, religion, ethnic or national origin, political beliefs, marital status, age, sexual orientation, social and family background, linguistic preference, pregnancy, or disability.
Veterans are provided re-employment rights in accordance with P.L. 93-508 (Federal Law) and Section 205.07 (Florida Statutes), which stipulate categorical preferences for employment.
Non-Discrimination
School Board Member
and Cabinet Retreat
2010 Review
Agenda
8:30 Continental Breakfast
9:00 Retreat Welcome and Day’s Expectations
Introduction of Strategic Framework
Accountability Overview
Operating and Capital Budget Outlook
Legislative Issues
Facility Utilization and New School Models
12:30 Lunch
1:00 School Board Policy, Leadership, and Governing
*Discussion Facilitated by Florida School Boards Association
3:15 Wrap up
Strategic Framework
EducationThis pillar supports activities and functions
leading to an educational experience that
fosters individual excellence in a
collaborative environment leading to
responsible citizenship, global
awareness, and lifelong
learning.
Financial
Efficiency/Stability
This pillar supports activities and
functions that ensure effective and ethical
business operations, sound stewardship
of resources, and responsible budget
management.
School/District
Leadership
This pillar supports activities and
functions which enhance talent
recruitment and management, leadership
development and effective and ethical
governance.
Student, Parent
and Community EngagementThis pillar supports activities and
functions which enhance student,
parent, and community
understanding, awareness, and
support for our schools and
District.
Student Achievement:
Preparing for Success in
the Third Millennium
2009-2014 M-DCPS Strategic Framework
EducationThis pillar supports activities and functions
leading to an educational experience that
fosters individual excellence in a
collaborative environment leading to
responsible citizenship, global
awareness, and lifelong
learning.
Financial
Efficiency/Stability
This pillar supports activities and
functions that ensure effective and ethical
business operations, sound stewardship
of resources, and responsible budget
management.
School/District
Leadership
This pillar supports activities and
functions which enhance talent
recruitment and management, leadership
development and effective and ethical
governance.
Student, Parent
and Community EngagementThis pillar supports activities and
functions which enhance student,
parent, and community
understanding, awareness, and
support for our schools and
District.
Student Achievement:
Preparing for Success in
the Third Millennium
M-DCPS is focused on a singular goal: Student AchievementEach student succeeds as measured by:
1. Graduating
2. Having a post-secondary plan
3. Demonstrating age/grade level appropriate knowledge mastery
4. Successfully entering the higher education arena and/or workforce
65%
70%67%
60% 61%
48%
43%
31%
68%70%
66%
62%64%
51%
42%
37%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10
2009 and 2010 District FCAT SSS Reading
Percent Scoring 3-5
2009 2010
76%73%
59%
51%
56%
60%
65% 65%
78%
72%
60%
53%
59%
63% 63%
73%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10
2009 and 2010 District FCAT SSS Mathematics
Percent Scoring 3-5
2009 2010
42%
34%
29%
44%
34%
30%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 11
2009 and 2010 District FCAT SSS Science
Percent Scoring 3-5
2009 2010
72%
79%
58%
73% 74% 73%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade 4 Grade 8 Grade 10
2009 and 2010 District FCAT Writing Essay Scores
Percent Scoring 4 and Above
2009 2010
51%
58%
78%
85%
57%60%
81%84%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2009 2010 2009 2010
Reading Mathematics
2009 and 2010 District FCAT Graduation TestPercent of Students Meeting Graduation
Requirements on the First Attempt
M-DCPS State
Longitudinal Graduation Rates for M-DCPS
68.5
3.6% increase M-DCPS
2.5% increase State
2009
2010
By Ethnic Group
Longitudinal Graduation Rates for M-DCPS
Blacks Whites Hispanics
47.1%
31.9%
15.9%
2.6% 2.5%0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
4 Year College/University No Plans Community College Technical School Military
Post-Secondary Educational Plans for 2009-10 Graduating Class
14
15
Beginning in the 2009-10 school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT-related factors and the remaining 50% will be based on factors that include:
A school’s graduation rate;
The performance and participation of students in AP, IB, Dual Enrollment, AICE, and industry-certification (as valid data becomes available);
The postsecondary readiness of the students as measured by the SAT, ACT, or CPT;
The high school graduation rate of at-risk students;
The performance of a school’s students on statewide standardized end-of-course assessments(when available); and
Growth or decline in the data components from year to year.
16
Bill revises School Grading System to:
Include End of Course results in calculating school grades for: Performance components in reading and mathematics
Learning gains components for reading and mathematics
Lowest 25% gains components in reading and mathematics
Assessments will include EOCs required for high school
graduation, including the following:
Algebra (2010-11)
Geometry, Biology and U.S. History (2011-12)
Civics (2012-13)
17
18
Development of Assessments in Non-Core areas such as:
Social Studies, Art, Music, PE, Career Academies
Performance Pay for Teachers
Value–Added Models
Determine teacher effectiveness across diverse assessment
instruments
Automated Teacher Evaluation System
Development of an automated system to capture teacher
evaluations and student achievement growth
19
20
Access to Active Student Reports
including:
Accountability
Academic Achievement
Attendance
Suspensions
21
22
23
Electronic e-textbooks
Pacing Guides
Teacher Class Roster with student
assessment information
24
25
26
Links to Learning Based on student performance
Provides links to educational software partners and specific Learning Path
Single Sign-On Reading Plus
Explore Learning Gizmos
Voyager Ticket To Read
Electronic textbooks Access to e-Textbooks
Email Allows 2 way communication - students to teachers/teachers to students
Alert Box System Specifically tailored alerts
Emergency Alert System (for all users)27
28
Parent Account Registration
New and easier registration process and password management
Parent Portal
New layout
Easier access to grade book
Alert Box System
Specifically tailored alerts
Emergency Alert System (for all users)
District Provided Parent Email
Parents can request a District email account
29
30
Operation
Graduation
MAST @
Homestead
International Preparatory
Academy @ Gables
Primary Arts & Arts are
Special
District Operated Clinics
School Board Member
and Cabinet Retreat
2010 Review