2009 ABCs/AYP Results Accountability Services August 11, 2009.

2009 ABCs/AYPResults

Accountability ServicesAccountability Services

August 11, 2009August 11, 2009

2009 District AYP Results

• 68 out of 76 targets met (89.5%)– 2008: 59 out of 76 (77.6%)– 2007: 58 out of 76 (76.3%)– 2006: 57 out of 74 (77.0%)– 2004: 62 out of 69 (89.9%)– 2003: 58 out of 73 (79.5%)

AAYYPP


* NOTE: Occupational Course of Study (OCS) Assessments scores counted against participation for all NC high schools– did not pass peer review per NCLB requirements– OCS students count in the 95% tested targets as not

having been tested

CHANGES FROM 2008 TO 2009

Met Not Met

In GD 3-8 Reading: African-American, Hispanic, EDS, LEP, SWD

In GD 3-8 Math: African-American, Multiracial, EDS, SWD

In GD 10 Math: African-American, Hispanic, EDS, LEP, All Students

In GD 10 Reading: Hispanic*, SWD, SWD*

In GD 10 Math: LEP*, SWD*

* percent tested target

AAYYPP


Grades 3-8

– 2009: 39 out of 39 (100%)

– 2008: 30 out of 39 (77%)

– 2007: 30 out of 39 (77%)

Grade 10

– 2009: 29 out of 37 (78%)

– 2008: 29 out of 37 (78%)

– 2007: 28 out of 37 (76%)


• Met all subgroup targets for grades 3-8• Met all targets for:

– All Students– Asian– African American– Multi-racial– Native American– White– Economically Disadvantaged Students

Cohort Graduation Rate

• Used in AYP as the high school’s other academic indicator

• Follows a ninth-grade cohort of students and tracks the percentage of students graduating in:– 4 years or earlier (used in AYP)– 5 years or earlier

Cohort Graduation Rate

• 2009 4-year Cohort Graduation Rate(first year ninth-graders in 2005-06): 72.7%– 2008: 70.8%– 2007: 70.7%

• 2009 5-year Cohort Graduation Rate (first year ninth-graders in 2004-05): 74.0% – 2008: 73.9%

73.7

70.7 70.8

72.773.8

66.666.1

68.8

66.3

62.963.8

79.5 79.8

82.6

78.8 78.6

71.7

74.6

74.0

79.7

79.3

69.869.5

68.3

60

65

70

75

80

85

2006 2007 2008 2009

WSFCS Charlotte-Mecklenburg Durham Guilford Wake STATE

4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate

67.074.5

64.2

40.9

80.1

65.3

38.9 40.3

66.9

75.0

64.1

45.7

79.4

57.6

35.9

53.5

68.1

77.4

66.2

49.4

81.5

61.2

41.3

55.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Male (2062) Female(1980)

Afr.-Am.(1487)

Hispanic(391)

White(1999)

EDS (1347) LEP (179) SWD (329)

2007 2008 2009


77.3

73.9 74.0

75.4

77.0

70.6

71.7

69.0

66.0

80.8

84.9

81.6

72.9

81.4

75.5

81.7

70.3

71.8

65

70

75

80

85

2007 2008 2009

WSFCS Charlotte-Mecklenburg Durham Guilford Wake STATE


2009 ABC Results

ABCs – NC Accountability

• Measures school-wide accountability by calculating Growth (Academic Change) and Performance – Designed to act as a check and balance

• Model primarily consists of state assessments– High schools have a dropout & college track

component

AABBCCss

• Performance Composite Changes:– Science 5 and 8 added to composite– OCS scores added to composite– Higher of the original EOG scores or

Retest 1 used in calculation of PC

Changes to 2009 ABC Model

AABBCCss

• Growth Changes:– Reading EOG back in model (out in

2007-2008)– US History growth formula adjusted– College University Prep/College Tech

Prep component modified to give credit to schools whose percentages were over 90%

Changes to 2009 ABC Model

AABBCCss

Basic Assumptionof ABC Growth

A student is expected to perform at least as well this year as she/he has done in the past, relative to

other NC students

How Do You Measure Relative Performance?

PROBLEM: Scale scores can’t be used – they’re different for each test

SOLUTION: Scores are “standardized” so that tests can be equitably compared to each other

Sample 7th Grade Student – in 5th grade in 2007

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.045

-2.4

00

-2.3

00

-2.2

00

-2.1

00

-2.0

00

-1.9

00

-1.8

00

-1.7

00

-1.6

00

-1.5

00

-1.4

00

-1.3

00

-1.2

00

-1.1

00

-1.0

00

-0.9

00

-0.8

00

-0.7

00

-0.6

00

-0.5

00

-0.4

00

-0.3

00

-0.2

00

-0.1

00

0.0

00

0.1

00

0.2

00

0.3

00

0.4

00

0.5

00

0.6

00

0.7

00

0.8

00

0.9

00

1.0

00

1.1

00

1.2

00

1.3

00

1.4

00

1.5

00

1.6

00

1.7

00

1.8

00

1.9

00

2.0

00

2.1

00

2.2

00

2.3

00

2.4

00

C-SCALES

PR

OB

AB

ILIT

Y

2007 Grade 5 Math=340(C-Scale: -1.489)

2007

Sample 7th Grade Student – in 6th grade in 2008

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.045

-2.4

00

-2.3

00

-2.2

00

-2.1

00

-2.0

00

-1.9

00

-1.8

00

-1.7

00

-1.6

00

-1.5

00

-1.4

00

-1.3

00

-1.2

00

-1.1

00

-1.0

00

-0.9

00

-0.8

00

-0.7

00

-0.6

00

-0.5

00

-0.4

00

-0.3

00

-0.2

00

-0.1

00

0.0

00

0.1

00

0.2

00

0.3

00

0.4

00

0.5

00

0.6

00

0.7

00

0.8

00

0.9

00

1.0

00

1.1

00

1.2

00

1.3

00

1.4

00

1.5

00

1.6

00

1.7

00

1.8

00

1.9

00

2.0

00

2.1

00

2.2

00

2.3

00

2.4

00

C-SCALES

PR

OB

AB

ILIT

Y

2008 Grade 6 Math=342(C-Scale: -1.33)

2007 2008

EXPECTED GROWTH

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.045

-2.4

00

-2.3

00

-2.2

00

-2.1

00

-2.0

00

-1.9

00

-1.8

00

-1.7

00

-1.6

00

-1.5

00

-1.4

00

-1.3

00

-1.2

00

-1.1

00

-1.0

00

-0.9

00

-0.8

00

-0.7

00

-0.6

00

-0.5

00

-0.4

00

-0.3

00

-0.2

00

-0.1

00

0.0

00

0.1

00

0.2

00

0.3

00

0.4

00

0.5

00

0.6

00

0.7

00

0.8

00

0.9

00

1.0

00

1.1

00

1.2

00

1.3

00

1.4

00

1.5

00

1.6

00

1.7

00

1.8

00

1.9

00

2.0

00

2.1

00

2.2

00

2.3

00

2.4

00

C-SCALES

PR

OB

AB

ILIT

Y

Expected Growth:(C-Scale: -1.297)

2007 2008

TA

RG

ET

EXAMPLE FOR A HIGH-ACHIEVING STUDENT

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.045

-2.4

00

-2.3

00

-2.2

00

-2.1

00

-2.0

00

-1.9

00

-1.8

00

-1.7

00

-1.6

00

-1.5

00

-1.4

00

-1.3

00

-1.2

00

-1.1

00

-1.0

00

-0.9

00

-0.8

00

-0.7

00

-0.6

00

-0.5

00

-0.4

00

-0.3

00

-0.2

00

-0.1

00

0.0

00

0.1

00

0.2

00

0.3

00

0.4

00

0.5

00

0.6

00

0.7

00

0.8

00

0.9

00

1.0

00

1.1

00

1.2

00

1.3

00

1.4

00

1.5

00

1.6

00

1.7

00

1.8

00

1.9

00

2.0

00

2.1

00

2.2

00

2.3

00

2.4

00

C-SCALES

PR

OB

AB

ILIT

Y 2007 2008

TA

RG

ET

2007 Grade 3 Math=355(C-Scale: 1.21)2008 Grade 4 Math=362(C-Scale: 1.38)

2007 Grade 3 Math=355(C-Scale: 1.21)2008 Grade 4 Math=362(C-Scale: 1.38)

EXPECTED GROWTH for SCHOOLS

• All Academic Change (AC) - for students with pretest scores and 140 days in membership - are averaged together

• If the average is ZERO or greater, the school has made growth

HIGH GROWTH for SCHOOLS

• If 60% of all ACs are ZERO or greater, then the school makes HIGH GROWTH

• 60% = 3/5, which is a ratio of 3:2, or 1.5

High Growth, 32

Less Than Expected Growth,

20Expected Growth,

19

High Growth, 21


18Expected Growth,

33

ABCs: Growth

2008 2009

29%

25%46%

44%

28%26%

High Growth, 32


20Expected Growth,

19

High Growth, 29


12

Expected Growth, 31

ABCs: Growth (Adjusted)

2008 2009

40%

17%43%

44%

28%26%

48.8%

52.9%

39.5%

36.2%

29.2%

9.8%

40.9%

36.1%

40.9%

40.5%

45.8%

58.8%

10.4%

11.0%

19.6%

23.3%

25.0%

31.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Charlotte-MecklenburgSchools

Wake County Schools

STATE

Guilford County Schools

Forsyth County Schools

Durham Public Schools

High Growth Expected Growth Less Than Expected Growth

2009 ABC Growth Comparisons

ABC Growth

Schools that have made at least expected growth every year since 1997:

– Brunson Elementary– The Downtown School– Jefferson Elementary– Sherwood Forest Elementary– Southwest Elementary– Whitaker Elementary– Jefferson Middle (2000) – West Forsyth High (1998)

2009 ABC Recognitions


Six Honor Schools of Excellence

– Jefferson Elementary– Lewisville Elementary*– Meadowlark Elementary*– Sherwood Forest Elementary*– Whitaker Elementary*– Early College*

* new to category in 2009


– Cash Elementary*– Clemmons Elementary– Downtown School– Piney Grove Elementary*– Southwest Elementary*

– Vienna Elementary*– Jefferson Middle– Meadowlark Middle*– Reagan High– West Forsyth High

Ten Schools of Distinction



– Bolton Elementary*– Brunson Elementary– Gibson Elementary*– Ibraham Elementary*– Kernersville Elementary– Mineral Springs Elem.*– Moore Elementary– Old Richmond Elem.– Old Town Elem.*– Rural Hall Elementary– Sedge Garden Elementary– South Fork Elementary*– Speas Elementary*

– Walkertown Elementary– Ward Elementary*– Clemmons Middle*– Hanes Middle– Kernersville Middle– Northwest Middle– Paisley Middle*– Southeast Middle– Walkertown Middle– East Forsyth High*– Glenn High*– Mount Tabor High*

Twenty-five Schools of Progress



• Nine No Recognition Schools

• Ten Priority Schools

• Nine Low Performing Schools:Easton Elementary* Forest Park Elementary

Middle Fork Elementary Petree Elementary

Carver High Jacket Academy

School of Biotechnology School of Computer Tech.

WS Preparatory Academy


No Recognition, 5

Honor School of Excellence, 1

School of Distinction, 9

Low Performing, 12

School of Progress, 19

Priority School, 22

Priority School, 15

No Recognition, 4

Low Performing, 9

Honor School of Excellence, 6

School of Distinction, 10

School of Progress, 25

ABCs:Recognitions

2008

2009

ABCs: Recognitions2009 NC ABC Recognitions

7%

9%

9%

33%

21%

21%

15%

14%

8%

45%

45%

37%

39%

36%

26%

7%

10%

4%

7%

6%

10%

8%

15%

24%

21%

22%

46%

3%

2%

9%

13%

10%

12%

5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Wake County Schools

STATE

Charlotte-MecklenburgSchools

Guilford County Schools

Forsyth County Schools

Durham Public Schools

Honor School of Excellence School of Excellence School of DistinctionSchool of Progress No Recognition Priority SchoolLow Performing

ABCs: As A District

0.187

0.094

0.117

0.082

0.033

0.166

0.115

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

0.140

0.160

0.180

0.200

MATH 3 MATH 4 MATH 5 MATH 6 MATH 7 MATH 8 ALL MATHGRADES

AV

ER

AG

E G

RO

WT

H

0.027

0.0190.022

-0.029

0.049

0.042

0.021

-0.040

-0.030

-0.020

-0.010

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

READING3

READING4

READING5

READING6

READING7

READING8

ALLREADINGGRADES

AV

ER

AG

E G

RO

WT

H

-0.015

-0.062

0.014

0.096

0.059

0.017

-0.080

-0.060

-0.040

-0.020

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

ALGEBRA 1 BIOLOGY CIVICS &ECONOMICS

ENGLISH 1 US HISTORY ALL EOCSA

VE

RA

GE

GR

OW

TH

ABCs: As A District

– Elementary, Middle and High made Expected Growth as a whole

– Each Grade Span would be a School of Progress• Elementary PC: 70.9%• Middle PC: 70.7%• High PC: 66.9%

– District made High Growth in Math 3, 5 and 8

Questions?

2009 ABCs/AYP Results Accountability Services August 11, 2009.

Documents

Transcript of 2009 ABCs/AYP Results Accountability Services August 11, 2009.