2008-2009 Funded Internship Programs in California

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing

Ensuring Educator Excellence 11

2008-20092008-2009Funded Internship Funded Internship

Programs in Programs in CaliforniaCalifornia

April 2010April 2010

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Internship Program Participation & ExpendituresInternship Program Participation & Expenditures

Fiscal YearFiscal YearNumber of Number of

Funded Funded ProgramsPrograms

Number of Number of Interns Interns ServedServed

Number of Number of Districts Districts InvolvedInvolved

FundingFunding

(Millions)(Millions)

1994-951994-95 2929 1,2381,238 150150 $2.0$2.0

2004-052004-05 7272 8,3418,341 842842 $20.8$20.8

2005-062005-06 7474 7,3097,309 871871 $24.9$24.9

2006-072006-07 7272 8,1718,171 891891 $24.9*$24.9*

2007-082007-08 7070 8,0638,063 500500 $25.1*$25.1*

2008-092008-09 6868 7,9627,962 615615 $22.4$22.4

**Includes enhanced fundingIncludes enhanced funding

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Intern Program Participants Intern Program Participants 1994-95 to 2008-091994-95 to 2008-09

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

Inte

rns

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Funded Intern Program Credential Areas Funded Intern Program Credential Areas

YearYearMultiple Multiple SubjectSubject

Single Single SubjectSubject

Special Special EducationEducation

TotalTotal

2002-20032002-20034,5084,508

(62.5%)(62.5%)1,5881,588

(22%)(22%)1,1211,121

(15.5)(15.5)7,2177,217

2005-20062005-20061,5931,593

(21.8%)(21.8%)2,6972,697

(36.9%)(36.9%)3,0113,011

(41.2%)(41.2%)7,309*7,309*

2006-20072006-20071,7531,753

(20.8%)(20.8%)3,0283,028

(36%)(36%)3,6343,634

(43.2%)(43.2%)8,415*8,415*

2007-20082007-20081,6981,698

(21%)(21%)2,9552,955

(36.5%)(36.5%)3,7553,755

(46.4%)(46.4%)8,408*8,408*

2008-20092008-20091,3691,369

(17.2%)(17.2%)2,8692,869

(35.1%)(35.1%)3,9933,993

(50.2%)(50.2%)8,231*8,231*

*Candidates can seek more than one credential.

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Intern Recruitment Sources Intern Recruitment Sources 2008-20092008-2009

0.4 1.62.8

7.9

21.7

13

24.721.9

5.9

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Mili

tary

Sci &

Tec

h

Social

Ser

vice

s

Busines

s

College/U

niv

Parap

rofe

ssio

nal

STSP/PIP

Other

Teac

hing

Other

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Age of Interns 2004-2008Age of Interns 2004-2008

20-3020-30 31-4031-40 41-5041-50 51-6051-60 60 60 PlusPlus

Decline Decline to Stateto State

2004-052004-05 44.8%44.8% 27.1%27.1% 17.0%17.0% 8.5%8.5% .9%.9% 1.6%1.6%

2005-062005-06 47.5%47.5% 25.3%25.3% 15.6%15.6% 9.0%9.0% 1.0%1.0% 1.7%1.7%

2006-072006-07 48.1%48.1% 26.2%26.2% 15.3%15.3% 8.0%8.0% 1.0%1.0% 1.5%1.5%

2007-082007-08 48.6%48.6% 26.4%26.4% 15.1%15.1% 7.8%7.8% 1.0%1.0% 1.2%1.2%

2008-092008-09 47.6%47.6% 27.4%27.4% 15.1%15.1% 7.5%7.5% 1.2%1.2% 1.0%1.0%

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Age of InternsAge of Interns2008-092008-09

15.1

7.51.2 1

47.6

27.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

20-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 60 Plus Declineto State

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Ethnic Distribution of Interns Ethnic Distribution of Interns 2003-20082003-2008

YearAfrican

AmericanNative

American

Asian(Chinese, Japanese, Korean,

Southeast Asian)

Filipino/Pacific

IslanderHispanic

White/Non

Hispanic

2003-04 9% 1% 5.4% 1.7% 26.7% 50.3%

2004-05 9.9% .9% 6.3% 2% 24.6% 52.3%

2005-06 9.2% 1.2% 6.5% 2.4% 23.5% 54.8%

2006-07 8.4% 1.1% 6% 2.6% 22.6% 55.6%

2007-08 8.1% 1.2% 6% 3.5% 23.4% 50.7%

2008-09 8% 1.9% 6.2% 4.1% 23.9% 51%

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Intern GenderIntern Gender

Multiple Multiple SubjectSubject

Single Single SubjectSubject

Education Education SpecialistSpecialist

MaleMale 23.5%23.5% 47.5%47.5% 29.4%29.4%

FemaleFemale 76.5%76.5% 52.5%52.5% 70.6%70.6%

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Intern Single Subject Credential Intern Single Subject Credential Major Content Areas 2004-2008Major Content Areas 2004-2008

YearYear ScienceScience MathMath English English Social Social StudiesStudies

2004-052004-05570570

20.2%20.2%

724724

25.7%25.7%

796796

28.2%28.2%

257257

9.1%9.1%

2005-062005-06497497

17.4%17.4%

753753

26.3%26.3%

756756

26.4%26.4%

254254

8.9%8.9%

2006-072006-07547547

17.3%17.3%

821821

26%26%

797797

25.3%25.3%

300300

9.5%9.5%

2007-082007-08552552

18.1%18.1%

785785

25.8%25.8%

797797

26.1%26.1%

262262

8.6%8.6%

2008-092008-09 567567

19.8%19.8%

814814

28.4%28.4%

690690

24.1%24.1%

224224

7.8%7.8%

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Intern Completer Intern Completer Survey ResultsSurvey Results

2,619 Responses2,619 Responses

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


How well did pre-service prepare you?How well did pre-service prepare you?

23

29.3

7

34.4

0

10

20

30

40

Very well Well Somewhatwell

Not well

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


How often did you communicate with your How often did you communicate with your support providers?support providers?

22.4

12.1

26.725.3

6.3 5

0

10

20

30

40

Daily 2-3times/week

Once aweek

Twice amonth

Once amonth

Less thanonce amonth

Per

cen

t

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Was support time adequate to meet Was support time adequate to meet your needs?your needs?

48.6

9.1

35.4

4.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

VeryAdequate

Adequate SomewhatAdequate

NotAdequate

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Was support provided timely?Was support provided timely?

49.8

34.8

9.53.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Very Timely Timely SomewhatTimely

Not Timely

Per

cen

t

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Support Support Provider Provider

Survey ResultsSurvey Results

1,387 Responses 1,387 Responses

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Frequency of Communication with Frequency of Communication with InternIntern

12.8

28.3

39.3

11.2

5.31.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

Daily 2 to 3times per

week

Weekly Twice amonth

Once amonth

Lessthan

once amonth

Per

cen

t

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Adequacy of Support TimeAdequacy of Support Time

15.5

67.1

11.1

4.9

0

20

40

60

80

100

More thanadequate

Adequate Slightlyadequate

Notadequate

Per

cen

t

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Timeliness of SupportTimeliness of Support

25.6

60.9

11.5

0.10

20

40

60

80

100

Always Usually Sometimes Never

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Orientation to Support RoleOrientation to Support Role

23.1

41.5

1.4

17.715

0

10

20

30

40

50

Veryuseful

Useful Somewhatuseful

Not useful Did notreceive

Per

cen

t

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Administrator Administrator Survey ResultsSurvey Results

596 Responses596 Responses

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Interns Compared with Other Interns Compared with Other Beginning TeachersBeginning Teachers

49.541.4

8

0

20

40

60

80

100

Better As good Not as good

Per

cen

t

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Comparison of Interns & Beginning Comparison of Interns & Beginning Teachers in Selected AreasTeachers in Selected Areas

45.750

42.645.943.2 42.1

50.144.2

10.67.4 6.3 9.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Classroom &behavior

management?

Planning &implementinginstruction?

Assessingstudent learning?

Providingeffective teacher

strategies?

Per

cen

t

Better As good Not as good

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


How well has the intern program supported How well has the intern program supported the development of this beginning teacher?the development of this beginning teacher?

47.939.7

2.40

20

40

60

80

100

Very well Adequately Poorly

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Alignment of Intern Program with Alignment of Intern Program with District & School Improvement GoalsDistrict & School Improvement Goals

69.1

14.3 15.1

1.50

20

40

60

80

100

To a greatextent

Moderately A little Not at all

Pe

rce

nt

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing


Intern Program Achievement of GoalsIntern Program Achievement of Goals

53.9 57.250.3

39.835.939.9

1.5 1.31.70

20

40

60

80

100

Supporting andassisting intern

teachers to becomeskilled beginning

teachers

Preparing teachersusing a "learning by

doing"

Helping administratorsmeet teacher needs in

shortage areas

Pe

rce

nt

Very well Adequately Poorly

Co

mm

issi

on

on

Tea

cher

Cre

den

tial

ing

Ensuring Educator Excellence

Report to CommissionReport to Commission

““Update on Funded Teacher Update on Funded Teacher Development Programs” Development Programs”

Commission Agenda Item 3D, Commission Agenda Item 3D, December 2009December 2009

2727

http://www.ctc.ca.gov/commission/agendas/2009-12/2009-12-3D.pdf

2008-2009 Funded Internship Programs in California

Documents

Transcript of 2008-2009 Funded Internship Programs in California