2007 SPE ATW on Reservoir Performance
-
Upload
narendra-surya-aditya-krisna -
Category
Documents
-
view
34 -
download
7
Transcript of 2007 SPE ATW on Reservoir Performance
-
The role of the petrophysicist in The role of the petrophysicist in reservoir characterization and reservoir characterization and the analysis of reservoir the analysis of reservoir performance.performance.What do we bring to the table?What do we bring to the table?What do we want to take home?What do we want to take home?
Bob CluffBob CluffThe Discovery Group Inc.The Discovery Group Inc.consulting geoscientists and consulting geoscientists and petrophysicistspetrophysicistsDenver, ColoradoDenver, ColoradoPresentation at SPE Applied Technology Presentation at SPE Applied Technology Workshop, Key West, Florida, 8 Feb 2007Workshop, Key West, Florida, 8 Feb 2007
-
The big 3 we all want to The big 3 we all want to knowknow.. PorosityPorosity PermeabilityPermeability Fluid saturationFluid saturation
-
But these are what we really But these are what we really measure with logsmeasure with logs.... Natural earth potentials (spontaneous potential) Natural earth potentials (spontaneous potential)
between bedsbetween beds Electrical conductivityElectrical conductivity Natural gamma ray radiationNatural gamma ray radiation Neutron slowing down lengthNeutron slowing down length Thermal neutron capture cross Thermal neutron capture cross sectonsecton Speed of soundSpeed of sound Electron density from gamma ray scatteringElectron density from gamma ray scattering Gamma ray photoelectric absorptionGamma ray photoelectric absorption Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation timeNuclear magnetic resonance relaxation time just about any property of matter you can think of.just about any property of matter you can think of.
-
Role of the petrophysicistRole of the petrophysicist
Is to take the physical properties we can Is to take the physical properties we can measure measure downhole,thendownhole,then turn them into turn them into something useful.something useful.
That is, the reservoir properties of interest.That is, the reservoir properties of interest.
-
Two faces of PetrophysicsTwo faces of Petrophysics
Measurement scienceMeasurement science What physical properties can be measured What physical properties can be measured
that might be useful/interesting?that might be useful/interesting? Physics of the measurementPhysics of the measurement Engineering how to make the measurement Engineering how to make the measurement
in a dark, noisy, dirty in a dark, noisy, dirty downholedownhole enviromentenviroment Converting the raw measurements to Converting the raw measurements to
something closer to the property of interestsomething closer to the property of interest
-
Electron densityElectron density
Gamma rays are emitted by radioisotope Gamma rays are emitted by radioisotope source.source. GRGRss are scattered by the electron clouds are scattered by the electron clouds
surrounding the nearby atoms (Compton surrounding the nearby atoms (Compton scattering).scattering). GRGRss detected at 1, 2 or 3 nearby detectors are detected at 1, 2 or 3 nearby detectors are
attenuated, with the reduction directly attenuated, with the reduction directly proportional to the density of electrons proportional to the density of electrons between the source and the detectors.between the source and the detectors.
-
LoggingLoggingsondesonde
US Patent 3,321,625May, 1967
-
Electron density vs. bulk Electron density vs. bulk densitydensity
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
electron density (rhob x 2Z/A)
b
u
l
k
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
(
g
/
c
3
)
water
quartz
dolomite
pyrite
coal
limestone
-
Spine and ribs plotSpine and ribs plot
-
The second faceThe second face..
Interpretation scienceInterpretation science Interpreting physical measurements in terms Interpreting physical measurements in terms
of rock properties of interestof rock properties of interest determine porosity from bulk densitydetermine porosity from bulk density determine hydrocarbon saturation from electrical determine hydrocarbon saturation from electrical
conductivity and porosityconductivity and porosity Interpretation model developmentInterpretation model development Integration of petrophysical properties with Integration of petrophysical properties with
engineering and geologyengineering and geology
-
Example: bulk density Example: bulk density interpretationinterpretation The raw tool count rates have been The raw tool count rates have been
converted to bulk density and corrected converted to bulk density and corrected for for mudcakemudcake thickness by the logging thickness by the logging service company,service company, but we want to know the porosity of the but we want to know the porosity of the
formation, not the density.formation, not the density.
-
Bulk densityBulk density--density density porosity plotporosity plot
Schlumberger, 2005
-
Porosity computationPorosity computation
PhiDPhiD = (= (RhoMaRhoMa RhoB)/(RhoMaRhoB)/(RhoMa RhoFlRhoFl))Where: Where: RhoMaRhoMa = the matrix density= the matrix density RhoBRhoB = measured bulk density= measured bulk density RhoFlRhoFl = fluid density= fluid density
Problem for the interpretation petrophysicist is:Problem for the interpretation petrophysicist is: What is the matrix density? What is the matrix density? Rocks are rarely pure end member mineralsRocks are rarely pure end member minerals-- they are usually they are usually
mixtures so the matrix density will not be a constant value.mixtures so the matrix density will not be a constant value. What is the fluid density? Water, oil, gas, or a combination What is the fluid density? Water, oil, gas, or a combination
thereof? thereof? At formation conditions. At formation conditions. Do we need to know Do we need to know saturation to solve for porosity??saturation to solve for porosity??
-
Density porosity solutionDensity porosity solution
-0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45OCNL
3
.
0
2
.
9
2
.
8
2
.
7
2
.
6
2
.
5
2
.
4
2
.
3
2
.
2
2
.
1
2
.
0
1
.
9
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
GRCORR0 300[N/A]
GRCORR0 300[N/A]
Density1.95 2.95G/C3
Neutron0.45 -0.15V/V
Sonic140 40US/F
Pe0 20[N/A]
Density1.95 2.95G/C3
Neutron0.45 -0.15V/V
Sonic140 40US/F
Pe0 20[N/A]
7950
8000
8050
8100
8150
82008200
LESA 6.1, 1992-2006 Digital Formation, Inc.File: LA-LIME.LAS Well Name: LOUISIANA LIMESTONEPlot: C-DN-S46.PLT Plot Name: Density vs. Comp. Neutron (S-1991, p.46)Gross Interval: 7950 to 8170 by 1 FRanges: 7950-8170Time: 05:59 PM Date: Sat, Feb 03, 2007
Schlumberger Chartbook (1991) p.46
Dolom
ite
0
510
15
20
25
30
35
40
Limest
one
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Sandst
one
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Anhy
drite
0
SulfurSalt
Plagioclase
Kspar
Chlorite
Illite
Kaolinite
Is this a change inmatrix density (lithology)or a change in fluids??
-
Log Log exampleexample
-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45Neutron
3
2
.
9
2
.
8
2
.
7
2
.
6
2
.
5
2
.
4
2
.
3
2
.
2
2
.
1
2
1
.
9
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Schlumberger Chartbook (1991) p.38
Dolom
ite
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Limest
one
0
5
1015
2025
3035
4045
Sandst
one
0
5
10
1520
25
3035
40
SaltSulfur
Anhydrite
K-spar
Plagioclase Chlorite
Illite
Kaolinite
Shale Point
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130Sonic Transit Time (us/ft)
3
2
.
9
2
.
8
2
.
7
2
.
6
2
.
5
2
.
4
2
.
3
2
.
2
2
.
1
2
1
.
9
1
.
8
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Schlumberger Chartbook (1991) p.44
Time Average
Dolom
ite
0
10
20
30
40
Sand
stone
0
10
20
30
40
Limest
one
0
10
20
30
40
Sulfer
Sylvite
SaltTrona
Gypsum
Polyhalite
Anhydrite
Schlumberger Chartbook (1991) p.44
Field Observation
Dolom
ite
0
10
20
40
Sand
stone0
10
2030
Limest
one
0
10
20
30
40Sulfer
Sylvite
SaltTrona
Gypsum
Polyhalite
Anhydrite
Shale Point
-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45Neutron
4
0
5
0
6
0
7
0
8
0
9
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
S
o
n
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
T
i
m
e
(
u
s
/
f
t
)
Schlumberger Chartbook (1991) p.42
Time Average
Dolom
ite
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Limest
one
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Sand
stone
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Salt
Anhy
drite
Schlumberger Chartbook (1991) p.42
Field Observation
Dolom
ite
05
10
15
20
25
30
35
Limest
one
05
10
15
20
25
30
35
Sand
stone
0
510
15
20
25
30
Salt
Anhy
drite
Shale Point
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Pe [N/A]
3
2
.
9
2
.
8
2
.
7
2
.
6
2
.
5
2
.
4
2
.
3
2
.
2
2
.
1
2
1
.
9
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Schlumberger Chartbook (1991) p.64
Sand
ston
e
010
2030
40
Dol
omite
010
2030
40
Lim
esto
ne
010
2030
40 Sal
t
0A
nhyd
rite
0
Illite
Chlorite
Kaolinite
Montmorillonite
Shale Point
LESA 6.1, 1992-2006 Digital Formation, Inc.File: 2508321080_Daniels 1.las Well Name: DANIELSPlot: Interactive Shale Point - English.plt Plot Name: Density vs. Pe (S-1991, p. 64)Gross Interval: 11000 to 12532 by 0.5 FRanges: 11000-12532Time: 06:13 PM Date: Sat, Feb 03, 2007
Density in Shale = 2.514
Neutron in Shale = 0.299
Dt in Shale = 65
Pe in Shale = 3.5
-
So what is it we do?So what is it we do?
We integrate the observed tool response We integrate the observed tool response with with Our geologic understanding of the formation Our geologic understanding of the formation
of interest. of interest. Core and ditch cutting samplesCore and ditch cutting samples Mud log observationsMud log observations All the other log measurements that respond All the other log measurements that respond
to lithology and porosity to obtain a to lithology and porosity to obtain a consistent & logical interpretationconsistent & logical interpretation
-
Biggest challenges facing Biggest challenges facing petrophysics in this decadepetrophysics in this decade #1 is people, people, people!#1 is people, people, people! Look around you. WeLook around you. Were not getting younger.re not getting younger. Largest potential pool of petrophysical talent will be Largest potential pool of petrophysical talent will be
the people retiring from big companies.the people retiring from big companies. Retirees donRetirees dont want to work in a traditional office or t want to work in a traditional office or
cubicle, 8cubicle, 8--5, commuting environment5, commuting environment Expect to see Expect to see micromicro--consultanciesconsultancies pop up in odd pop up in odd
places like Key West, Maui, places like Key West, Maui, TusconTuscon, etc., etc. We are working towards a virtual office concept We are working towards a virtual office concept
where our employees can be scattered around the where our employees can be scattered around the world, weworld, well provide the infrastructurell provide the infrastructure
-
ChallengesChallenges
#2 is also people!#2 is also people! Frankly, we donFrankly, we dont work together very well.t work together very well. Still an inherent tension in this industry Still an inherent tension in this industry
between engineers and geoscientists.between engineers and geoscientists. CrossCross--disciplinary training and even disciplinary training and even
understanding of what the other people are understanding of what the other people are doing remains weak.doing remains weak. There are HUGE gains to be made in how There are HUGE gains to be made in how
we interact and work together.we interact and work together.
-
ChallengesChallenges
#3 is permeability#3 is permeability Perm is the farthest property of interest from what Perm is the farthest property of interest from what
we can measure with wireline or LWD toolswe can measure with wireline or LWD tools Dynamic properties are difficult to determine from Dynamic properties are difficult to determine from
static measurementsstatic measurements Inherently vector quantity when we mostly take Inherently vector quantity when we mostly take
scalar, scalar, omniomni--directional directional measurmentsmeasurments Perm itself is poorly understood at the rock levelPerm itself is poorly understood at the rock level We donWe dont do too bad a job in sandstone reservoirs, t do too bad a job in sandstone reservoirs,
but carbonates and tight formations are toughbut carbonates and tight formations are tough
-
ChallengesChallenges
#4 is the evaluation of unconventional #4 is the evaluation of unconventional reservoirsreservoirs TodaysTodays seals, tomorrows reservoirsseals, tomorrows reservoirs WeWere producing re producing TCFTCFss of gas from rocks of gas from rocks
that are tighter than the seals over most that are tighter than the seals over most offshore fieldsoffshore fields Tight gas sands are difficult, but gas shales Tight gas sands are difficult, but gas shales
are a whole different ballgameare a whole different ballgame
-
What do we bring to the What do we bring to the party?party? Understanding of the underlying Understanding of the underlying
measurements & physicsmeasurements & physics wewere putting the physics back into re putting the physics back into PetrophysicsPetrophysics
Geologic expertise and our understanding of Geologic expertise and our understanding of the behavior of earth materialsthe behavior of earth materials Ability to work with diverse data collected over Ability to work with diverse data collected over
many years, bringing it together into as many years, bringing it together into as coherent a package as possiblecoherent a package as possible
-
What do we need What do we need back back fromfrom you?you? Ground truth.Ground truth. Integration of the static data with the Integration of the static data with the
dynamic data.dynamic data. Feedback to improve our models and Feedback to improve our models and
representations if they are not providing a representations if they are not providing a plausible reservoir description.plausible reservoir description. Help us sort out nonHelp us sort out non--unique answers.unique answers.
The role of the petrophysicist in reservoir characterization and the analysis of reservoir performance.What do we bring to thThe big 3 we all want to know.But these are what we really measure with logs..Role of the petrophysicistTwo faces of PetrophysicsElectron densityLoggingsondeElectron density vs. bulk densitySpine and ribs plotThe second face.Example: bulk density interpretationBulk density-density porosity plotPorosity computationDensity porosity solutionLog exampleSo what is it we do?Biggest challenges facing petrophysics in this decadeChallengesChallengesChallengesWhat do we bring to the party?What do we need back from you?