2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

28
2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management

Transcript of 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

Page 1: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

2005 Retiree MIPOverview

October, 2005

Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright

HR Compensation Management

Page 2: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

2

Agenda

Introduction Health care cost trends Supply- side and demand-side drivers of cost increases Retiree Medical Insurance Program – Key features and

recent changes Recent Retiree MIP financial status – Incurred Jan to June

2005 paid through Sep 2005 Prescription Program

Cost of the Rx program Cost Containment Strategies Medicare Part D Formulary

Page 3: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

3

Health care cost trends Health care costs in the U.S. increased 156% per capita from

1980 to 1990 and by “only” 71% from 1991 to 2000; more recently we have seen premium increases of 11% to 12% annually

During the 1980s with the economy expanding rapidly ERs reluctantly managed to absorb costs

With the 1991 recession the private sector responded with increased dominance of managed care and HMOs – medical costs still continued to outpace the CPI overall

At present ERs are still struggling to recover from the recent slowdown and with intense competition and overcapacity in many industries have been finding it difficult to pass these costs via increased prices

In addition managed care has lost some clout with health providers because of increased consolidations in the health industry and because HMOs loosened some of their restrictions due to widespread consumer backlash

ERs are responding with increased cost-shifting to EEs since they cannot pass the cost increases along to customers

Page 4: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

4

Supply-side vs demand-side drivers

Supply-side drivers When we look at the medical component of the CPI - hospital costs and

prescription drug costs have grown the fastest in recent yearsHospital costs The main drivers behind hospital cost increases are use of advanced

medical technology, increased labor costs ( nurses and pharmacists) and renewed pricing power from hospital consolidations

Prescription drug mix and promotion Proliferation of drugs aimed at “lifestyle’ maladies such as erectile

dysfunction (ED), high cholesterol, hypertension, heartburn, acid reflux, ulcers, depression, toenail infections and the like

Increased direct-to-consumer advertising that encourages consumers to ask doctors for specific prescriptions by brand name

These drugs utilization has grown dramatically by consumers with minor ailments ( some of which could be controlled with better management of diet and eating habits) and some with purely self-diagnosed symptoms

Page 5: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

5

Supply-side vs demand-side drivers

Demand-side drivers The rise in behavioral risk factors ( tracked by Centers for Disease

Control) 70% of health care costs are attributable to lifestyle choices and behaviors Smoking - decline has plateaued except for 18-34 year olds which

have increased 15% since 1990 Chronic drinking - amongst all age groups has doubled from 3% of

the population to 5.9% Obesity (BMI of 30 or more) – has doubled from 11.6% in 1990 to

22.1% in 2002, while not a disease it is strongly associated with such chronic conditions as diabetes, hypertension and asthma costing the economy more than smoking and drinking combined

Increased utilization ( medical products and services especially for specialists and prescription drugs) Office visits to specialists increased by 13.8% between 1990 and

2000 The population is consuming more prescriptions and more expensive

prescriptions – number of Rx increased 45% between 1992 and 2002 to 10.6 per capita and the price of prescriptions increased a whopping 107% to $55.00 per Rx

Page 6: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

6

Retiree MIP – Key Features The Retiree MIP provides comprehensive medical, dental and

prescription coverage - financial protection at a time when you need it most – likely higher medical expenses and likely fixed, lower income

Funding is a partnership between the Bank and each retiree – you pay 25% of contributions but close to 40% overall when including deductibles, coinsurance and co-payments. You have a significant investment in the plan, therefore it is in your best interest for you to understand the plan and its benefits

Please note the MIP does not cover every expense! There are MIP plan limits, certain items are not covered at all and you will have some co-payments to make

The Retiree MIP is a PPO – Preferred Provider Option – type of plan. If you choose an in-network medical or dental provider, you will have lower out of pocket costs and the Plan will also benefit from savings

Staff are eligible for retiree medical coverage if they meet certain age and service requirement when they terminate employment from the Bank – 5 years service and rule of 60 ( age plus service is at least 60) with coverage beginning as early as age 50

Page 7: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

7

Retiree MIP – Key Features The Retiree MIP is a self-insured program; Aetna, Van Breda and

Pharmacare are administrators – they are required to process claims in accordance with the MIP Plan design. The contract is designed with financial incentives to encourage administrators to pay claims promptly and accurately

Claims are now serviced for the whole group by Aetna Global Benefits, based in Tampa, Florida. All MIP members received new ID cards in June 2005. Provides additional services such as 24 hour phone coverage, access to international network providers for direct billing outside the US

If you have a permanent non US address you also have a choice, once per year in December, to choose between Aetna and Van Breda as your administrator. The Plan design is essentially the same, but network savings are higher with Aetna if most of your medical treatment takes place in the US

Page 8: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

8

Retiree MIP - recent changes

Recent Changes: Increased overall contributions May 1, 2005 – 4.3% Implemented three tier premium based on Single, Dual

and Family coverage - (600 plus family coverages )

Last increase in deductible and co-pay was Jan 1, 2003

History of Changes since 1991: Average annual rate increase of 5.2% over the period

1991- 2004 Cost of the program has gone up 5.9% annually over

the same period

Page 9: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

9

Key Cost and Utilization Statistics- MEDICAL only AETNA claims Current: Jan-Jun ’05 Prior: Jan-Jun ‘04

Demographics Summary for MedicalCustomer

PriorCustomer

Current

% Change

from Prior

Number of Retirees 3,775 3,957 4.8%Number of Members 7,025 7,299 3.9%Ratio of Members to Retirees 1.9 1.8 -0.9%Average Age of Membership 58.4 59.1 1.1%

Key Statistics²Total Medical Paid Amount $7,418,548 $9,480,575 27.8% Medical Paid Amount per Retiree $1,965 $2,396 21.9% Medical Paid Amount per Member $1,056 $1,299 23.0%Inpatient Paid Amount per Member $268 $424 58.4%Ambulatory Paid Amount per Member $788 $875 11.0%Admissions/1,000 Members 48 52 8.8%Days of Care/1,000 Members 200 284 41.6%Average Length of Stay 4.2 5.4 30.1%Total Surgeries/1,000 Members 504 508 0.8%

Inpatient Surgeries/1,000 Members 35 40 16.4%Ambulatory Surgeries/1,000 Members 469 468 -0.4%

Office Visits/1,000 Members 2,303 2,432 5.6%ER Visits/1,000 Members 54 69 29.0%

$788

$268$424

$875

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

Medical Paid Amountper Member

Inpatient Paid Amountper Member

Ambulatory Paid Amountper Member

Page 10: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

10

Key Cost and Utilization Statistics- MEDICAL only AETNA claims

Comparison of Medical Paid AmountPer Member

$1,056

$788

$268

$1,299

$424

$875

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

Medical Paid Amountper Member

Inpatient Paid Amountper Member

Ambulatory PaidAmount

per Member

Prior Current

Page 11: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

11

Large Claimants – Medical only AETNA claimsLarge Claimant Threshold: $50,000

Prior Current ChangeNumber of Claimants 7 15 114.3%Claimants Per 1,000 Members 1.0 2.1 N/AMedical Paid Amount for these Claimants $608,958 $1,763,310 189.6%Average Paid Per Catastrophic Claimant $86,993.95 $117,554.01 35.1%% of Total Paid Amount 8.2% 18.6% 10.4%

Medical Paid Amount per Retiree $1,804 $1,951 8.1%Medical Paid Amount per Member $969 $1,057 9.1%Inpatient Paid Amount per Member $224 $263 17.8%Ambulatory Paid Amount per Member $746 $794 6.5%

Claimants Above Threshold¹

Net of Catastrophic Claimants

Page 12: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

12

Large Claimants – Medical only AETNA claims

Paid per MemberWith & Without Catastrophic Claimants

$875

$1,299

$424

$1,057

$794

$263

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

Inpatient Paid Amountper Member

Ambulatory Paid Amountper Member

Total Paid Amountper Member

Current Current Net of Catastrophic

TrendWith & Without Catastrophic Claimants

23%

11%

58%

9%6%

18%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Inpatient Paid Amountper Member

Ambulatory PaidAmount

per Member

Total Paid Amountper Member

Current Current Net of Catastrophic

Page 13: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

13

Provider Network Experience- AETNA only Medical claims

In Network ExperiencePrior

PeriodCurrentPeriod Change

Current Network

Discount Savings

%

$9,915,925 $11,677,426 17.8%

Network Discount Savings:Inpatient Facility $1,140,112 $1,121,240 -1.7% 32.8%Ambulatory Facility $949,210 $927,629 -2.3% 37.2%Physician/Other $2,649,103 $3,035,042 14.6% 52.6%Total $4,738,424 $5,083,911 7.3% 43.5%

Network Discount Savings per Retiree $1,255 $1,285 2.4%Network Discount Savings per Member $675 $697 3.3%Average Discount Savings per Admission $4,207 $3,259 -22.5%

Network Utilization Metrics% Admissions In Network 80.4% 90.3% 9.9%% Physician Office Visits In Network 67.4% 69.8% 2.4%% Claims Paid In Network 70.7% 73.0% 2.3%

Billed Network Charges (before discount)

Page 14: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

14

Medical Cost Sharing- AETNA only Medical Claims

PriorPeriod

CurrentPeriod % Change

Number of Retirees 3,775.0 3,956.5 4.8%Allowed Amount $12,475,269 $15,611,448 25.1%Coordination of Benefits (COB) $2,650,030 $3,488,306 31.6%

Deductible** $1,224,604 $1,292,419 5.5%Copays $248,254 $284,064 14.4%Coinsurance** $933,761 $1,065,961 14.2%

Retiree Paid Portion $2,406,619 $2,642,445 9.8%Retiree Paid Portion per Retiree $638 $668 4.8%

Plan Paid Portion $7,418,548 $9,480,575 27.8%Plan Paid Portion per Retiree $1,965 $2,396 21.9%

Employer % Share Medical 44.6% 45.5% 1.3%Retiree % Share Medical 34.2% 32.1% -2.4%COB % Share Medical 21.2% 22.3% 1.1%

Page 15: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

15

Medical Cost Sharing- AETNA only Medical ClaimsCost Sharing % of Allowed Amount

Customer - Prior

Employer Plan Paid Portion, 59%

Deductible, 10%

Copays, 2%

Coinsurance, 7%

COB, 21%

Cost Sharing % of Allowed AmountCustomer - Current

Plan Paid Portion, 61%

Deductible, 8%

Copays, 2%

Coinsurance, 7%

COB, 22%

Page 16: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

16

Utilization and Unit Cost by Medical Cost category – AETNA only Medical claims

Prior Current % Change Prior Current % Change Prior Current % ChangeFacility:

Inpatient Days $205 $359 75.0% 179 284 58.8% $1,147 $1,265 10.2%Ambulatory Visits $51 $91 78.8% 145 251 73.6% $350 $361 3.0%Emergency Room Visits

$18 $21 15.2% 54 69 29.0% $334 $298 -10.7%Subtotal Facility: $274 $470 71.8%

Professional:Specialist Office Visits $84 $83 -0.5% 1,410 1,472 4.4% $59 $57 -4.7%Primary Office Visits $42 $48 14.7% 904 970 7.4% $46 $50 6.9%Surgeries - Inpatient $26 $31 17.1% 35 40 16.4% $759 $763 0.6%Surgeries Ambulatory Facility $43 $45 4.5% 136 134 -1.6% $315 $335 6.2%Surgeries - Office $26 $28 10.0% 336 336 0.1% $76 $83 9.8%Medical Service Visits $168 $190 13.3% 2,417 2,534 4.8% $70 $75 8.1%

Subtotal Professional: $389 $426 9.5%

AncillaryRadiology Services $125 $141 12.7% 1,503 1,617 7.6% $83 $87 4.8%Lab Services $51 $62 23.1% 2,990 3,455 15.5% $17 $18 6.5%Home Health Visits $40 $52 29.2% 267 344 28.8% $151 $152 0.3%Mental Health Visits $41 $40 -2.3% 428 454 6.2% $95 $87 -8.0%Medical Pharmacy $137 $108 -21.2% 4,946 6,755 36.6% $28 $16 -42.3%

Subtotal Ancillary: $394 $403 2.4%

Grand Total $1,056 $1,299 23.0%

Paid Amount Per Member Utilization Per 1,000 Unit Cost

Page 17: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

17

Summary of recent financial

AETNA only Medical Claims - Current: Jan-Jun ’05 Prior: Jan-Jun ‘04

Medical Costs up per member increased 23% ( excluding catastrophic claims up 9%)

Most of this increase is due to : increased utilization:

Increase in number of hospital admissions, inpatient surgeries and ER visits

Increase in average length of hospital stay Increase in catastrophic claims ( over $50,000 from 7 to 15

claimants) price increase:

Lower in-network hospital discounts cost shifting to plan – lower out-of-pocket costs to

retirees partially offset with increase in network usage and

COB savings

Page 18: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

Prescription Program

Page 19: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

19

Prescription Cost and Utilization Statistics

1996 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Annual Increase

Total Drug Ingredient Cost $1,237,855 $4,530,401 $5,978,646 $7,157,624 $8,369,390 $10,098,809 30.0%Total Dispensing Fees $46,384 $164,237 $184,397 $199,351 $206,183 $217,314 21.3%Total Copayments $247,236 $840,181 $979,199 $1,148,517 $1,472,561 $1,652,351 26.8%Total Net Plan Cost $1,037,001 $3,854,457 $5,183,844 $6,208,459 $7,103,018 $8,663,775 30.4%

Average Monthly Membership 3,628 6,320 7,200 7,333 7,700 7,815 10.1%

Ingredient Cost PMPM $28.45 $59.74 $69.20 $81.34 $90.58 $107.68 18.1%Dispensing Fee PMPM $1.07 $2.17 $2.13 $2.27 $2.23 $2.32 10.1%Copayments PMPM $5.68 $11.08 $11.33 $13.05 $15.94 $17.62 15.2%Net Plan Cost PMPM $23.83 $50.82 $60.00 $70.55 $76.87 $92.38 18.5%

Total Claim Count 24,930 72,086 81,024 89,382 93,544 99,289

U-Rate (Rx Claims PMPY) 6.88 11.41 11.25 12.19 12.15 12.70 8.0%

Avg. Ingredient Cost per claim $49.65 $62.85 $73.79 $80.08 $89.47 $101.71 9.4%Avg. Disp. Fee per claim $1.86 $2.28 $2.28 $2.23 $2.20 $2.19 2.1%Avg. Copay per claim $9.92 $11.66 $12.09 $12.85 $15.74 $16.64 6.7%

Avg. Net Cost per claim $41.60 $53.47 $63.98 $69.46 $75.93 $87.26 9.7%

Avg. Days Supply per claim 40.10 39.00 42.95 44.00 45.00 45.00

Copayments as % of Annual Cost 19.3% 17.9% 15.9% 15.6% 17.2% 16.0%

Average Annual Increase - 1996 - 2004

Increase in Membership 10.1%Increase in Utilization 8.0%Increase in Price 9.4%

30.0%

Increase due to Price and Utilization 18.1%

Page 20: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

20

Cost containment strategies Some drug cost control tactics

deductibles dollar based or percentage based co-pays Educating physicians and pharmacists Educating EEs Formularies Financial or other incentives for using generic

medications Mail order pharmacies Pharmaceutical Benefit Managers (PBMs)

Page 21: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

21

Medicare Part D

Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act (MMA) was enacted in Dec 2003

A voluntary prescription drug benefit was added ( Part D) effective Jan 2006 which was designed for Medicare enrollees (currently enrolled or eligible for Part A or Part B) who do NOT have Rx protection through other employer plans

Employer Plans that provide Rx plans at least as good as Part D are deemed Actuarially Equivalent qualify for subsidy for those Medicare eligible participant who do not enroll in Part D – subsidy approximately $450 per enrollee in 2004 projected to increase to approximately $600 in 2006 – total subsidy is projected at over $1.2 million annually in 2006

Page 22: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

22

Medicare Part D vs Retiree MIP Rx Benefits

MEDICARE Deductible $250 Medicare pays 75% for

claims between $250 and $2,250

Medicare pays 0% for claims between $2,250 and $5,100

Maximum Annual Deductible and Copay is $3,600 ( True out-of-pocket)

Catastrophic coverage begins after $5100 of annual expenses submitted – Medicare pays 95%

Premium is $420 per participant per year

Retiree MIP Deductible of $50 Brand co-pay is 20% and

Generic co-pay is 0%

Maximum annual Out-of-pocket Deductible and Copay for Individual is $1,000

Catastrophic coverage begins after approximately $4,800 of annual expenses submitted – Bank pays 100% thereafter

Premium is 25% of annual cost – approx. $320 per year

Page 23: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

23

Four possible plan design options Do Nothing

No Federal Subsidy No changes to the existing prescription program

Take the Federal Subsidy Apply for 28% federal subsidy -Plan should be deemed

actuarially equivalent No changes to the existing prescription program

Introduce “Wrap Around” Plan For the portion not paid by Medicare Not eligible for Subsidy Bank pays Part D premium

Eliminate Prescription coverage for Medicare eligible participants in the Retiree MIP Retirees Shift to Part D Bank pays the Part D premium

Page 24: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

24

Take the Federal Subsidy

The Bank is applying for the subsidy - we are not sure if it will be approved since the legislation is silent on international organizations being eligible for the subsidy

RMIP members will receive a letter from the Bank confirming that the RMIP provides “Creditable Coverage” – no later than November 15, 2005. This will be provided each year no later than end of November

subsidy is calculated at 28% of the eligible charges between $250 and $5,000, so the maximum subsidy is capped at $1,330 per enrollee

The subsidy projected at $1.2 million in 2006, if approved by Medicare, will be credited to the RMIP and would therefore benefit both retirees and the Bank under the existing cost sharing arrangement of Retiree and Bank of 25% and 75% respectively

Page 25: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

25

The RMIP and Medicare Part D

The RMIP coverage as noted earlier is much richer than Medicare Part D.

Enrollment in Medicare Part D is voluntary but for retirees enrolled in RMIP, Medicare Part D is not cost effective so you are strongly advised to NOT ENROLL in the MEDICARE Part D Plan

If a member of the RMIP enrolls in Medicare D, the Bank is unable to co-ordinate prescription drug benefits, and your Prescription coverage under the RMIP would be suspended. This suspension is for a minimum one year period regardless of the length of your Medicare D enrollment

Medicare will fund this new program, but it will actually be delivered through one of many Medicare Prescription Drug Plans to be offered from pharmacies e.g. CVS, or from drug manufacturers e.g. Merck Medco. The Medicare D enrollee would have to study all these new plans and make a choice of prescription benefit plan coverage, then enroll and pay Medicare D premium plus additional plan premium if needed.

Page 26: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

26

The RMIP and Medicare Part D

Look out!! Marketing has already started for the January 1, 2006 new plan. Medicare D enrollment period runs from November 15, 2005 until May 2006. The Medicare Prescription Drug Plans are obliiged to offer a minimum set of benefits, but many will offer additional benefits if you are willing to (i) figure out what is what and (ii) pay additional premium

Remember IF you enroll in Part D you will have to pay the Medicare premium of $420 annually

If you lose RMIP coverage, because you elect to end your RMIP coverage, or because you cease to be eligible for it ( e.g. if you divorce a Bank Group retiree), then you may be able to enroll in Medicare D later. The letter of Creditable Coverage from the Bank’s MIP will confirm that you had prior RMIP coverage and this will avoid you paying a Medicare D premium penalty in the future.

Page 27: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

27

Medicare D Summary

Letter of Creditable Coverage to be sent by Bank Group by November 15, 2005 – format pre-determined by CMS/US Govt.

In addition, a letter in “plain english” will be sent at the same time explaining what the Creditable Coverage letter means

Medicare enrollees should review the official Medicare material e.g. booklet called “Medicare and You, 2006”, websites such as: www.cms.hhs.gov or www.medicare.gov

Be wary of aggressive marketing efforts by Pharmacies and manufacturers – RMIP members have great Rx benefits, which exceed those available under Medicare D

Be aware of the consequences to your RMIP if you do enroll in Medicare D

Page 28: 2005 Retiree MIP Overview October, 2005 Rajiv Nundy & Deborah Wright HR Compensation Management.

28

Prescription Drug FormularyUnder Consideration for the RMIP A formulary identifies a drug as Generic or Brand name (preferred)

or Brand name (non-preferred) with higher benefits for Generic, then Brand name (preferred) and then Brand name (non-preferred). One possible co-pay would be 0% for Generic, 20% for Brand name (preferred) and 30% for Brand name (non-preferred)

Free choice of drug use will remain, but if a member elects a higher cost drug, where that drug has chemically equivalent options – brand and or generic – then that member will pay a higher co-pay for that choice

The Formulary will encourage members to discuss drug selection with their doctors

New drugs that are “new to market” will be “ preferred” for at least the first 6 months on the market. The Formulary Manager ( Pharmacare for the RMIP) will then determine if this new drug has pharmacological equivalents in the preferred brands or generic drugs and therefore determine if the new drug will remain “ preferred” or become non-preferred

This option does shift costs to those members who use the more expensive drugs, when there are lower cost equivalent drugs available

RMIP “stop loss” protection for prescription drugs will remain in place to ensure financial protection for members