©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 5: Constitutional Law.

©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved.1

Chapter 5: Chapter 5: Constitutional LawConstitutional Law

Chapter 5: Chapter 5: Constitutional LawConstitutional Law


HistoryHistoryHistoryHistory

Before the Revolutionary War, the States wanted a confederation with weak national government and very limited powers. After the war, in 1787, States voted to amend Articles of Confederation and create a new, federal government that shared power with States.

Before the Revolutionary War, the States wanted a confederation with weak national government and very limited powers. After the war, in 1787, States voted to amend Articles of Confederation and create a new, federal government that shared power with States.


§1: Constitutional Powers of §1: Constitutional Powers of the United States Government the United States Government §1: Constitutional Powers of §1: Constitutional Powers of

the United States Government the United States Government • Constitution established a federal form of

government with checks and balances among three branches: executive, legislative and judicial.

• National government has limited, enumerated powers delegated from States.

• See the “Vote-Smart” site.


U.S. Commerce ClauseU.S. Commerce ClauseU.S. Commerce ClauseU.S. Commerce Clause• Power to regulate interstate commerce

defined in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824).• Expansion to private businesses began with

Wickard v. Fillburn (1942).• Today, Commerce Clause it authorizes the

national government to regulate virtually any business enterprise, including internet.

• Limits: U.S. v. Lopez (1995), Alden v. Maine (1999).


State CommerceState CommerceState CommerceState Commerce

• States possess inherent police powers to regulate health, safety, public order, morals and general welfare.

• State laws that substantially interfere with interstate commerce will be struck down.

• Raymond Motor v. Rice (1978).


U.S. Supremacy ClauseU.S. Supremacy ClauseU.S. Supremacy ClauseU.S. Supremacy Clause

• Article VI of the states the U.S. Constitution is the “Supreme Law of the Land.”

• In case of direct conflict between state and federal law, state law is invalid.

• Congress can preempt states powers when it chooses to act exclusively.

• Taxing Powers (Emerging Trends: Taxing the Internet).


§ 2: Business and § 2: Business and the the Bill of RightsBill of Rights

§ 2: Business and § 2: Business and the the Bill of RightsBill of Rights

• Bill of Rights are not absolute.

• Originally the Bill of Rights was a limit on the national government’s powers.

• During the early 1900’s, the Supreme Court applied the Bill of Rights to the States via the “due process” clause of the 14th amendment.


Free Speech Free Speech Free Speech Free Speech

• A fundamental (some would say “natural”) right afforded highest protection by courts.

• Symbolic Speech.

• Texas v. Johnson (1989).

• R.A.V. vs. City of St.Paul (1992).


Commercial SpeechCommercial SpeechCommercial SpeechCommercial Speech

Advertising is protected speech. Restrictions must:– Implement substantial government interest;– Directly advance that interest; and– Go no further than necessary.– Case 5.1: Bad Frog Brewery v. NY State

Liquor Authority (1998).


Corporate Political SpeechCorporate Political SpeechCorporate Political SpeechCorporate Political Speech

Afforded significant protection by the first amendment, but not as much as the right of natural persons.

• First National v. Bellotti (1978).

• Consolidated Edison v. Public Service Commission (1980).


Unprotected SpeechUnprotected SpeechUnprotected SpeechUnprotected Speech

• Certain types of speech are not protected by the first amendment:– Slander.– Pornography, Obscenity.– Fighting Words.

• What about “Hate Speech”?– Doe v. University of Michigan (1989).


Freedom of ReligionFreedom of ReligionFreedom of ReligionFreedom of Religion

• First amendment many neither prohibit the “establishment” nor prohibit the “free exercise” of religion.

• The first amendment does not require complete “separation of church and state.”

• Mandates accommodation of all religions and forbids hostility toward any. – Zorach v. Clauson (1952).


Freedom of ReligionFreedom of ReligionFreedom of ReligionFreedom of Religion

• First amendment guarantees the “free exercise” of religion.

• Employers must reasonably accommodate beliefs as long as the employee has “sincerely held” beliefs.

• Frazee v. Illinois (1989).


Self-IncriminationSelf-IncriminationSelf-IncriminationSelf-Incrimination

• Fifth amendment guarantees no person can be compelled to testify against himself in a criminal proceeding.

• Does not apply to corporations or partnerships.

– Case 5.2: Verniero v. Beverly Hills Ltd (1998).


Searches and SeizuresSearches and SeizuresSearches and SeizuresSearches and Seizures

• Fourth amendment requires warrant with “probable cause”.

• Warrantless exceptions exist for “evanescent” evidence.

• Searches of Business: generally business inspectors must have a warrant.

• Marshall v. Barlow’s (1978).


§3: Other Constitutional §3: Other Constitutional ProtectionsProtections

§3: Other Constitutional §3: Other Constitutional ProtectionsProtections

• Privileges and Immunities Clause.–Citizens of all states have same privileges.

• Full Faith and Credit Clause.–Documents and judgments of a state are honored by another state.

• Due Process.• Equal Protection.• Privacy Rights.


Due ProcessDue ProcessDue ProcessDue Process

• 5th and 14th amendments provide “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.”

• Due Process includes both Procedural and Substantive issues.


Procedural Due ProcessProcedural Due ProcessProcedural Due ProcessProcedural Due Process

• Procedures depriving an individual of her rights must be fair and equitable.

• Constitution requires adequate notice and a fair and impartial hearing before a disinterested magistrate.


Substantive Due ProcessSubstantive Due ProcessSubstantive Due ProcessSubstantive Due Process

• Focuses on the content or substance of legislation.

• Laws limiting fundamental rights (speech, privacy, religion) must have a “compelling state interest.”

• Laws limiting non-fundamental rights require only a “rational basis”.


Equal ProtectionEqual ProtectionEqual ProtectionEqual Protection

• “Strict Scrutiny” test.– Laws that affect the fundamental rights of

similarly situated individuals in a different manner are subject to the “strict scrutiny” test.

– Any “suspect class” (race, national origin) must serve a “compelling state interest” which includes remedying past discrimination.



• Intermediate Scrutiny.– Applied to laws involving gender or legitimacy.– To be constitutional laws must be substantially

related to important government objectives.– (Example: Illegitimate teenage pregnancy).



“Rational Basis” Test.– Applied to matters of economic or social

welfare.– Laws will be constitutional if there is a rational

basis relating to legitimate government interest.

– Case 5.3: WHS Realty v. Morristown (1999).


PrivacyPrivacyPrivacyPrivacy

• Fundamental right not expressly found in the constitution, but derived from 1st, 5th and 14th amendments.

• Laws and policies affecting privacy are subject to the compelling interest test.


Law on the WebLaw on the WebLaw on the WebLaw on the Web

• Online Constitution at Cornell U.

• See the “Vote-Smart” site on federalism.

• Federalist Society.com.

• ACLU.org.

• Official U.S. Supreme Court site.

• Legal Research Exercises on the Web


Emerging Issues: Emerging Issues: Taxing CyberspaceTaxing CyberspaceEmerging Issues: Emerging Issues:

Taxing CyberspaceTaxing Cyberspace• States sales tax-sufficient “nexus”?

– Quill v. North Dakota (1992).

• Internet Tax Freedom Act.– http://www.house.gov/chriscox/nettax/lawsums

.html

Return

©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 5: Constitutional Law.

Documents

Transcript of ©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 5: Constitutional Law.