2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

117
2 Procedures , Pre- Incident Planning, and Size- Up

Transcript of 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

Page 1: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Procedures, Pre-Incident

Planning, and Size-Up

Page 2: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (1 of 10)

• List the kinds of operations that should be covered by standard operating procedures.

• Explain the importance of standard operating procedures.

Page 3: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (2 of 10)

• Discuss the relationship between standard operating procedures, pre-incident plans, and size-up.

• Examine the relationship between standard operating procedures, equipment, and training.

Page 4: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (3 of 10)

• Compare standard operating procedures to standard operating guidelines, explaining the role of a “reasonable person” clause.

• Articulate the main components of pre-fire planning and identify steps during a pre-fire plan review.

Page 5: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (4 of 10)

• Recall major steps taken during size-up and identify the order in which they will take place at an incident.

• Recognize the relationship between pre-incident planning and construction characteristics common to a community.

Page 6: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (5 of 10)

• Analyze construction methods during everyday responses and while surveying buildings under construction and demolition.

• Explain how pre-incident plan information is gathered using pre-formatted forms, as well as methods for storing and retrieving pre-plan information.

Page 7: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (6 of 10)

• Examine compatibility issues and usefulness of computer programs in pre-incident planning.

• Construct a priority chart of buildings to be preplanned by occupancy type.

Page 8: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (7 of 10)

• List factors to be considered during size-up and briefly define and explain the significance of each factor.

• Demonstrate (verbally and in writing) knowledge of fire behavior and the chemistry of fire.

Page 9: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (8 of 10)

• Recall the basics of building construction and how they interrelate to pre-fire planning and size-up.

• Define and explain the difference between occupancy, occupant, and occupied.

Page 10: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (9 of 10)

• Explain the size-up process in the chronological order in which information is received.

• Evaluate a specific fire department’s standard operating procedures.

• Prioritize occupancies to be pre-incident planned in a specific jurisdiction.

Page 11: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Learning Objectives (10 of 10)

• Create a pre-incident plan drawing and narrative.

• Perform an initial size-up based on limited information.

• Apply size-up factors to a fire situation and categorize factors as primary or secondary.

Page 12: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Overview (1 of 3)

• Fire-ground operations should be outlined in SOPs.

• The better the SOPs, the fewer decisions that will need to be made.

• SOPs, pre-plans, and incident-specific information are important size-up components.

Page 13: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Overview (2 of 3)

• Incident Action Plans (IAPs) require SOPs and a good size-up.

• Specific building information can be obtained through pre-planning.

• Evaluating an incident and developing an IAP must take place rapidly.

Page 14: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Overview (3 of 3)

• The IC has time to reevaluate as more information becomes available.– Size-up information and the IAP should

improve.

Page 15: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Developing Standard Operating Procedures (1 of 4)

• General guidelines used at structure fires or fires in similar occupancies

• Address any operation using a standard approach

• Written specifically for an individual department

Page 16: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Developing Standard Operating Procedures (2 of 4)

• There is a need for regional planning.

• Take the guesswork out of the fire-ground

• Are necessary for the first-arriving engine company

Page 17: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Developing Standard Operating Procedures (3 of 4)

• Influenced by: – Types of property to be protected– Resources available– Equipment– Training– Other factors

Page 18: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Developing Standard Operating Procedures (4 of 4)

• Provide a structure for the decision-making process

• Answers questions of:– Who makes what decisions?– At what level of command?– From where?

Page 19: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

National Incident Management System (NIMS)

• Establishes a command structure

• Describes the roles at incident scene

• Training must be commensurate with SOPs.– NFPA 1500

Page 20: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

SOPs, Equipment, and Training Are Interrelated

Page 21: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

SOPs: Naming Controversy (1 of 2)

• Standard operating procedures, standard operating guidelines, general operating guidelines.

• More important to have written procedures or guidelines than naming.– Procedures are guidelines.– Guidelines become procedures through

practice.

Page 22: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

SOPs: Naming Controversy (2 of 2)

• Solution– “Reasonable person” clause in the

procedures manual– Personnel should act reasonably if

modification of the procedure is appropriate.

Page 23: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Procedures or Guidelines

• Write them down.

• Train to them.

• Use them consistently.

Page 24: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Evaluating a Specific Property

• There should be a procedure describing the pre-planning system.

• Makes sense to gather information about a facility while visiting– Title III: Superfund Amendments and

Reauthorization Act (SARA) requirement

Page 25: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Pre-Plans

• Second step of the size-up process• Can take several forms

– Formal: include narrative and drawings– Simple: notations of particular problem

• NFPA 1620: Recommended Practice for Pre-Incident Planning– Outlines development, maintenance and

use

Page 26: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Recommended Occupancies (1 of 2)

• Assembly

• Educational

• Health care

• Detention and correctional

• Residential

• Residential board and care

Page 27: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Recommended Occupancies (2 of 2)

• Mercantile

• Business

• Industrial

• Warehouse and storage

• Special outdoor locations, such as transformer sub-stations

Page 28: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Types of Pre-Plans (1 of 4)

• Complex– Three or more buildings– Shows overview of complex– Used to identify:

• Building and fire protection features• Hazards

– Building numbering

Page 29: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Types of Pre-Plans (2 of 4)

• Formal– Property with substantial risk– Includes:

• Drawing of property• Specific floor layouts• Narrative

– Could include several plans

Page 30: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Types of Pre-Plans (3 of 4)

• Notation– Simple notation about a building

• Previous fire damage

– Notations in CAD systems– Exterior marking systems

• State of New Jersey Truss Marking System

Page 31: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Types of Pre-Plans (4 of 4)

• Training Issue– Could include buildings under construction

or demolition– Interior framework (skeleton) exposed– Could reveal construction

methods/materials

Page 32: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Pre-Plan Incident Checklist and Drawings (1 of 4)

• Includes planning for special occupancies or type of buildings

• Standard pre-incident plan form– Advantage: Predictable location of specific

information– Disadvantage: Large amounts of “not

applicable” space

Page 33: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Pre-Plan Incident Checklist and Drawings (2 of 4)

• Detailed format and intuitive drawing symbols are recommended.– Symbols should not require legend.

• Drawings are extremely useful.

Page 34: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Pre-Plan Incident Checklist and Drawings (3 of 4)

• Include:– Building name– Owner/manager/agent name– Telephone numbers– Emergency contact information

Page 35: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Pre-Plan Incident Checklist and Drawings (4 of 4)

• Include a tactical consideration.– Provides reminder

• Do not pre-assign companies.

Page 36: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Pre-Planning Preparation and Time

• Keeping current is as important as creating.

• Revision process is also time-intensive.– Computers help save time.

• Bad information can be worse than no information.

Page 37: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

What Structures Are Pre-Planned

• Decision depends on jurisdiction.• Operational priority list provides

direction.– Life safety– Extinguishment– Property conservation

• Challenging buildings should be pre-planned.

Page 38: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Modifying SOPs

• Standard method for addressing predictable operational circumstances

• Pre-plans address what is different or unusual.

• Pre-plans are specific, SOPs general.

• SOPs are not always the most effective way.

Page 39: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Estimating Life Safety Needs

• Buildings with unusual high risk to fire fighters or occupants should be pre-planned.– Nursing homes– Hospitals– Places of assembly– Schools

Page 40: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Estimating Extinguishment Needs

• Buildings with high fuel load should be pre-planned.– More than two standard pre-connects

necessary– Volume of fire compartment divided by 100

• Buildings with special or hazardous materials present in quantity should be pre-planned.

Page 41: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Estimating Property Conservation Needs

• High value contents could justify pre-planning effort.– Furs, jewelry, electronic equipment

Page 42: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Relationship of Pre-Planning to Size-up

• Size-up is a continuous process.– Natural extension of SOP/pre-planning

process

Page 43: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Analyzing the Situation Through Size-Up (1 of 2)

• Size-up factors are difficult to categorize.– Incident conditions dictate– Life safety most critical– Begins before incident: SOP development

and pre-planning– IC considers what is already known at time

of alarm– Dispatcher relays other information.

Page 44: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Analyzing the Situation Through Size-Up (2 of 2)

• Upon arrival, IC adds what is known.– Personal observation– Communications with companies/building

personnel– Reconnaissance

• Size-up continues throughout the incident into overhaul.

Page 45: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Life Safety/Fire Fighter Safety (1 of 2)

• Smoke and fire conditions– Directly related to occupant survival and

fire fighter safety– Primary factors at a structure fire

Page 46: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Life Safety/Fire Fighter Safety (2 of 2)

• Experienced ICs learn to evaluate pressure, smoke characteristics, and other factors.

• Interior reconnaissance best way to determine fire intensity

Page 47: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Fire Location• Necessary to successfully combat the

fire• Usually determined on arrival

– Information from Dispatch– Alarm systems– Information from occupants– Visual clues

• Smoke flowing rapidly from an opening may indicate fire is nearby.

Page 48: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Direction of Travel

• Life safety/fire fighter safety

• Direction of travel– Knowing where fire may spread is

important.– Fire, heat, smoke travel upward via path of

least resistance– Important to know the probability of fire

travel (construction methods, alterations)

Page 49: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Ventilation Status

• Key factor in all phases of operation– Venting for life– Vent should pull fire away from occupants

and fire fighters.

• Possibilities can be known through pre-planning.

Page 50: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Occupancy Type

• Major occupancies should be pre-planned.

• Building use will determine:– Likelihood of occupancy– Number of occupants– Fuel load and type– Value of contents– Other essential facts

Page 51: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Estimated Number of Occupants

• Difficult at best

• NFPA 101: Life Safety Code– Establishes maximum occupant load per

square foot

• Places of public assembly may have maximum number of occupants posted.

Page 52: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Evacuation Status

• Estimating number of people still in building is next logical step

• Most buildings do not have occupant accountability system.

• Primary search: only way to assure building has been evacuated– Should be verified with secondary search

Page 53: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Occupant Concerns (1 of 2)

• Proximity to fire– Pre-plans should show locations of

occupied areas.

• Awareness level– Awake and alert are more likely to hear

alarm– Awareness is directly related to type of

occupancy.

Page 54: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Occupant Concerns (2 of 2)

• Mobility– Occupancy of building can help determine

whether occupants can escape fire.

• Familiarity with building– People inside a public building are not

always familiar with building layout or alternate exits.

Page 55: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Primary and Alternative Egress Routes (1 of 2)

• Most will escape unassisted if there is sufficient egress.

• Codes specify egress facilities.

• Pre-plan drawings should show location of all exits.

Page 56: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Primary and Alternative Egress Routes (2 of 2)

• Many public buildings have areas of safe refuge.– Should be addressed in pre-plans– Must be checked by fire department in an

emergency

Page 57: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Medical Status of Occupants

• EMS should be requested whenever occupants are still in building.– Medical Branch should be considered.

Page 58: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Operational Status (1 of 2)

• SOPs provide a standard way of going to work.

• IC must continually evaluate safety and effectiveness of operation.– Determines whether a nonstandard attack would

be more effective

• Safety is the most important consideration.– IC must continually reevaluate for risk

management.

Page 59: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Operational Status (2 of 2)

• IC must ask:– Is the search being conducted in a systematic

manner?– Are the occupants who are in the most danger

being rescued?– Has the fire been properly vented to control the

fire spread?– Is progress being made in controlling the fire?– Are rate-of-flow requirements being met?– Has salvage been considered?

Page 60: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Fire Zones/Perimeters

• Area where a specific level of protective clothing is required

• Possibly a safe area where no protective clothing is needed

• Keeps non-response people out of the area

• Should be part of SOPs

Page 61: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Accountability

• Only accounts for fire fighters, not occupants

• Primary accountability system is NIMS.

• Freelancing must be avoided.

• Required by NFPA 1500: Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Programs.

Page 62: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Rapid Intervention

• RIC (Rapid Intervention Crew)– Team of fire fighters immediately available

to rescue fire fighters who need assistance

• Required by NFPA 1500: Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Programs

Page 63: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Organization and Control

• NIMS is the acceptable method of organizing an incident.

• All units must be included.

• Must work towards common tactical objectives within strategy

Page 64: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Rescue Options

• IC first evaluates ways occupants can be removed from the building.– Safest and most efficient option

Page 65: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing Concerns (1 of 3)

• Primary search– Determined by the following factors:

• Size of the area to be searched• Smoke conditions• Rescue methods available• Condition of the occupants

• Secondary search– Will not involve increased staffing

Page 66: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing Concerns (2 of 3)

• Interior rescue/evacuation– Could be the same required for primary

search– Additional teams may be assigned to

remove victims.

Page 67: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing Concerns (3 of 3)

• Exterior rescue/evacuation– Additional staffing will be needed if ladders

are used.– Most exterior rescues require more

staffing.

Page 68: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Access to Building Exterior

• Pre-plans should note:– Access points– Street or road access around structure– Aerial access points– Unsafe/inaccessible roadways

Page 69: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Access to Building Interior

• Forcible entry– Can significantly delay search and rescue

and initial attack– Needs should be noted on pre-plans.

• Structure– Conditions always should be considered in

size-up.– Risk-versus-benefit analysis

Page 70: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Signs of Collapse

• Failure of a supporting structure

• May occur without warning

Page 71: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Construction Type• All members should be familiar with

building types and problems.• Buildings should be classified.

– NFPA 220: Standard on Types of Building Construction

• Type I construction: Fire-resistive• Type II construction: Non-combustible• Type III construction: Ordinary• Type IV construction: Heavy timber• Type V construction: Frame

Page 72: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Roof Construction

• Killing mechanism

• Precursor to catastrophic collapse– Roof is tied to the walls.– Walls damaged by fire fail.– Roof collapses.

• Truss roofs should be pre-planned.

Page 73: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Condition

• Previously damaged

• Abandoned

• Pre-fire damage should be considered when determining attack mode.

Page 74: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Live and Dead Loads• Dead load

– Building and permanent attachments– Heavy roof loads should be noted on pre-plans.

• Live load– Building contents– Important when determining incident-specific

tactics– Should be noted on pre-plans

Page 75: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Fire Suppression Water Load

• Weight of the water discharged into the bldg. during suppression operations– One gallon of water = 8.33 pounds– 1,000 GPM = 8,330 pounds/minute

Page 76: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Enclosures and Fire Separations

• Type of construction and occupancy– Major clues in determining extension

probability

Page 77: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Extension Probability

• Directly related to presence of enclosures/fire separations

Page 78: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Concealed Spaces• Most buildings

– Common attics– Separations often damaged or removed

• Suspended ceilings– Fire can travel through false space.– If space involved in fire, expect rapid

collapse of truss roofs

• Should be part of pre-plan

Page 79: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Age of Building• Positive effects

– Older buildings have heavier, more fire-resistive construction.

– Renovated buildings may have lightweight construction added.

• Negative Effects– May weaken with age– Depends on construction materials and

maintenance

Page 80: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Height and Area (1 of 2)

• Size can partially dictate total volume of fire.– Rate of flow formulas are based on size of

the fire compartment.

Page 81: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Height and Area (2 of 2)

• Height of the building affects:– Effectiveness of aerial apparatus– Number of possible occupants– Type of construction– Fuel load– Other factors

Page 82: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Complexity and Layout

• Pre-plan should include a general floor layout.

• Personnel should orient themselves in large, complex buildings.– Relationship to the stairway, street,

standpipe, and other critical landmarks

Page 83: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Probability of Extinguishment

• Important to life safety

• Death and injury are greatly diminished when fire is extinguished.

• Key factors in determining fire attack method:– Flow requirements– Extent of fire

Page 84: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Offensive/Defensive/Non-Attack

• Deciding an attack strategy is critically important.

• Critical factors change as tactical objectives are achieved.

• The most important objectives are related to life safety.

Page 85: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Ventilation Status

• Finding/extinguishing the fire is easier when fire has self-vented.

• Should be vented as soon as possible

• Venting for extinguishment is done to move smoke/heat away from crews.

Page 86: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

External Exposures

• Should be shown on pre-plans

• Narrative should show nearby structures (not connected), vehicles, and other property threatened by the fire.

Page 87: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Internal Exposures

• Parts of the building

• Fire pathways should be identified in pre-plans.

Page 88: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Extinguishment Factors (1 of 2)

• Fuel load– Varies as to quantity, type, geometric orientation,

other factors

• Calculated rate of flow– Can the lines extinguish the fire?– Should be pre-calculated

• Number of hoselines– Can be determined once rate of flow is known

Page 89: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Extinguishment Factors (2 of 2)

• Water supply– Some systems have limited supply.– Larger systems have multiple supplies.

• Apparatus pump capacity– Specifications should consider available

water supply.– In many cases, pump capacity exceeds

water supply.

Page 90: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Manual Fire Suppression Systems (1 of 2)

• Standpipe systems– Best to use on upper floors– Reduces work to advance hoselines– Control valves, pumps, fire department

connections and hose outlets should be shown on pre-plans.

Page 91: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Manual Fire Suppression Systems (2 of 2)

• Standpipe systems, continued:– Use of this equipment also should be

explained.– SOPs also should specify hose, nozzles,

and necessary equipment.

Page 92: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Automatic Fire Suppression Systems

• Sprinkler systems– Primary tactic involves letting the system

do its job.– Control valves, pumps, fire department

connections, and hose outlets should be shown on pre-plans.

• Sprinkler system becomes the first line of defense.

Page 93: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Property Conservation

• Third operational priority– Seldom takes on urgency of life safety and

extinguishment– Information about property value and

location should be pre-planned.

Page 94: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Salvageable Property

• Nearly every property has some salvageable property.

• Can be included in pre-plans

• Property also may have non-monetary value.

Page 95: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Location of Salvageable Property

• Residential settings: throughout the building.

• Other settings: may be concentrations.– Computer rooms

• Pre-plans should identify these locations.

Page 96: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Water Damage (1 of 2)

• Water used a primary extinguishing agent

• Some quantity of water will be in a building.

• Water will migrate through openings.

Page 97: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Water Damage (2 of 2)

• Prefer to use built-in features to evacuate water

• If property can not be moved, common practice is to cover it.

Page 98: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Smoke Damage

• Can infiltrate entire building

• Common pathway is upward

• Most damage occurs on upper floors.

Page 99: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Ventilation

• Best way to reduce damage

• Materials that absorb smoke more susceptible to damage

• Can be overdone

• Damage should be limited to what is needed to achieve tactical objectives.

Page 100: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing: Total Versus Needed (1 of 6)

• IAP will require resources.

• Exact number may not be known.

• Approximations need to be made.

• Staffing is the most important and difficult resource to obtain.

Page 101: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing: Total Versus Needed (2 of 6)

• 11 to 13 fire fighters for safe fire attack– Working fire– Multi-level, single family dwelling– One or two hoselines– Life hazard– Limited areas to search

Page 102: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing: Total Versus Needed (3 of 6)

• More staffing necessary if:– Size and complexity of property increases– Additional hoselines needed

Page 103: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing: Total Versus Needed (4 of 6)

• NFPA Fire Protection Handbook– Suggests guidelines for high, medium, and low-

hazard occupancies and rural operations.

• NFPA 1710: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments (14–15 personnel)

Page 104: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing: Total Versus Needed (5 of 6)

• Additional staffing needed for:– Searching large areas– Physically removing victims– Larger rate of flow requirements– Areas beyond a fixed water supply

Page 105: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staffing: Total Versus Needed (6 of 6)

• IC must match incident requirements with available resources.– Offensive/defensive decision can be made.

Page 106: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Apparatus: Total Versus Needed

• Total apparatus versus apparatus needed– Defensive operations = apparatus intensive

Page 107: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Staging/Tactical Reserve

• SOPs should address staging.

• Small incidents = one engine company/one truck company

• Larger incidents = larger tactical reserve

Page 108: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Utilities

• Water, gas, electricity, other– Residential gas or fuel supplies can be

shut down if necessary.– Utility company personnel are better

equipped.– Pre-plans should show the location of shut-

offs.

Page 109: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Time of Incident

• Time of day (likelihood of occupants being present)

• Day of week (occupancy varies on different days)

• Time of year (weather conditions)

• Special times (holidays)

Page 110: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Weather

• IC should consider extremes.– Extreme heat/cold– Could require additional REHAB stations.– Humidity is important during heat

extremes.• Increases fatigue factor• Can affect smoke movement

Page 111: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Size-Up Chronology (1 of 5)

• SOPs and pre-incident plan– Done well in advance– Play a significant role in the IAP– Give the IC a head start

• Shift/day/time– IC should consider factors at time of duty

Page 112: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Size-Up Chronology (2 of 5)

• Alarm Information– Time-of-day factor– Dispatch information

• Building location/address• Fire location• Fire intensity • Occupant status

Page 113: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Size-Up Chronology (3 of 5)

• En route– Dispatcher– Companies arriving on scene

Page 114: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Size-Up Chronology (4 of 5)

• Visual observations at the scene– Initial IAP based on visual information and

reconnaissance from companies– IC must determine if current IAP will

accomplish desired objectives.– Quality and quantity of information will

increase with time.

Page 115: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Size-Up Chronology (5 of 5)

• Overhaul– Should be planned and deliberate– Caution should be taken to avoid injuries.

Page 116: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Summary (1 of 2)

• The IC’s job is simplified by:– Establishing procedures in advance of an

incident– Identifying target hazards– Developing pre-incident plans

Page 117: 2 Procedures, Pre-Incident Planning, and Size-Up.

2

Summary (2 of 2)

• A safe and effective IAP can be developed by:– Having this information available– Completing a thorough size-up