2. Preferences
-
Upload
patelshivani033 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 2. Preferences
-
7/25/2019 2. Preferences
1/7
2) Preferences
Economic Rationality
Principal behavioral assumption decision maker chooses its most preferred
alternative from those availableo Model decision-makerspreferences
o Availablechoice constitute the choice set
Theory of Preferences Self-interest individual maximizes over a set of preferences subject to constraints
o They do their best iven the circumstances
Theory based on
!" #ndividuals have consistent preferences$" #ndividuals seek to maximize their preference rankin%" #ndividuals are &illin to make tradeo's bet&een di'erent oods
preference statements(
o ability to say you like a bundle better
o ability to say you like both e)ually *indi'erent+
preference orderin(
o usin preference statements
o if $ conditions are satis,ed(
1. al&ays able to make preference statements2. preference statements are consistent
Preference Relations
omparin $ consumption bundles
o X*has x! of ood ! and x$ of ood $+
o Y *has y! of ood !. y$ of ood $+
Strict preference: x is more preferred than y
o o x y xpreferredstrictlyto bundle y
Wea preference:x is liked as much as y *at least as preferred+
o
o x y x preferred at least as muchas y
!n"i#erence: x is exactly liked as much as y
o /
o x / y x 0 y equally preferred
x y and y x x / y
x y and *not y x+
x y
These are all ordinalrelationsState only the order in &hich bundles are preferred
$inary Relationship Properties
preference relation( *orderin+
o omplete
o 1e2exive
o Transitive
-
7/25/2019 2. Preferences
2/7
%omplete
1elationship *1+ is complete for any pair of elements x.y
o x1y 3 y1x
o at least one is true
relationship complete(
o relation is 4 *,ts+ example trianle ,ttin in a circle 3 another trianle ,ttin
in a circleo not relation &hen the trianle dont ,t into each other
56T complete %ompleteness:any $ bundle x and y its al&ays possible to make(
o x y *x liked as much as y+
o y x *y liked as much as x+
never unable to rank them *indi'erent+
Re&ectivity
any bundle x is at least as preferred as itself
o x x
not every relation is re2exive
o A perpendicular to 7o 7 perpendicular to A
o A is not perpendicular to itself
Transitivity
#s 'is at least as preferredas y
0 yat least as preferredas (
then ' is at least as preferredas (
o x y and y z x z
no every relation is transitive
o A perpendicular to 7o 7 perpendicular to
o A is not perpendicular to 8 parallel
5on-Transitive Preferences
Alberts preferences
o A 7. 7 . A
o 9as bundle A o'er in exchane for A and :!
o Then o'er 7 in exchane for ; :!
o 6'er A in exchane for 7 ; :!
o #n the end has &hat he started &ith - :%
$inary Relationship Properties
Preference relation is
o omplete
All bundles of ods ranked
o 1e2exive
A is liked as much as itself
o Transitive
x liked at least as much as y 0 y liked at least as much as z x liked
alam as z+
-
7/25/2019 2. Preferences
3/7
!n"i#erence %rves
bundle x
sho&s bundles consumers think are indi'erent not ones that are better and &orse
indi'erence curves cannot cross *transivity assumption+
carver farther from the oriin are more preferred
set of all bundles equally preferredto x is the in"i#erence crve containin* 'o the set of all bundle y / x
not al&ays a curve
-
7/25/2019 2. Preferences
4/7
o only total amountrank-order
&illin to sub ! ood for another at constant rate
o slope of -1
convex not strictly convex
Example
Petroan 0 Shell as3 5eilson 0 Sealtestmilk
Perfect ompliments
Al&ays consumes commodities ! 0 $ in xed
proportion *!-!+o Perfect complements
o Number or pairspreference rank-order
Example
Tires and rims3 left shoes riht shoes
7ads
commodity consumer doesnt like
example likes peperoni doesnt like anchovies *tradeo'+
o ive extra peperoni to compensate for the anchovies
o anchovies vertical *bad+3 pep on horizontal *ood+
5eutrals consumer doesnt care about it one &ay or the other
o cares about amount of pepperoni he has. nothin about
anchovies
Preferences >xhibitin Station
7undle strictly preferred is a satiation point ,bliss
point)
6verall best bundle
#ndi'erence curves(
#ndi'erence
-
7/25/2019 2. Preferences
5/7
Well$ehave" preference
?ell-behaved( if it is monotonic conve'
3onotonicity:more of any ood is al&ays preferred
o no satiation. every commodity is a ood
o neative slope
o more of both bundles is better
%onve'ity:mixture of bundles *atleast &eakly+ preferred to
bundles themselves
Example:
DE-DE mixture of x 0 y z 8 *E"D+x ; *E"D+yz at least as preferred as x or
Strict %onve'ity
%onve'ity4 Strict %onve'ity
conve' set:any point on straiht line joinin $ elements of the set is also containein the set
o
ends points *boundary+ t 8 EB!o set of bundles &eakly preferres convex set
o may have 2at spots
Strictly conve'any point on a line joinin $ elements. >F>PT end points of thiline. must like entirely &ithin set *not boundary points+
o ?eihted av of $ indi'erent bundle is strictly preferred to the $ extreme
bundleso urves are round
,Wea) %onve'ity
-
7/25/2019 2. Preferences
6/7
5on%onve' Preferences ! 5on%onve' Preference !!
Slopes of !n"i#erence %rves
3ar*inal Rate of Sbstittion ,3RS) 8 slope
Marinal value *MG+
hane in x$B chane in x!
usually a neative number
measures rate at &hich consumer is &illin to substitute a ood mar*inal
/illin*ness to pay
"iminishin* mar*inal rate of Sbstittion( amount of ood ! person is &illin tive up for additional amount of ood $ increases the amount of ood ! increases
o for strictly convex M1S decreases as &e increase x!
3RS !n"i#erence %rve Properties
-
7/25/2019 2. Preferences
7/7