2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

32
Evaluation of Cleaners for Government Issued Headstones Mary F. Striegel and Jason Church National Park Service National Center for Preservation Technology and Training Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Transcript of 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Page 1: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Evaluation of Cleaners for Government Issued Headstones

Mary F. Striegel and Jason ChurchNational Park Service

National Center for Preservation Technology and Training

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 2: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

NCA Maintains 3 million+ gravesites.

• Today’s marker is tomorrow’s historic headstone.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 3: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

NCA preserves historic headstones which are 50 years or older.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 4: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

NCPTT is a leader in advancing preservation technology.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 5: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

NCPTT was contracted by NCA to evaluate cleaners for marble headstones based on soiling and biogrowth.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 6: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Recommendations must meet NCA National Shrine Standards.

• Headstones, markers, niche covers are clean, free of debris and objectionable accumulations.

• Headstones, markers, niche covers are not damaged by cemetery operations.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 7: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Definitions

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 8: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

The StudyPhase I (2004-2005)

• Define Goals

• Choose Cleaning Criteria

• Evaluate commercially available cleaners based on:

– Appearance

– Biological Re-growth

– Physical and Chemical Changes

– Ease of Use

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 9: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Selection of Cleaners:

Table 1. Chosen Cleaners are ordered from Acidic to Basic.

Cleaner H2Orange2 Grout Safe Kodak Photo-Flo D-2 Marble Cleaner Daybreak

pH 3.81 7 9.5 10.5 12.1

pH Acidic Basic Alcohol Chelate Solvent Surfactant Bactericide

D-2 9.5 X X

Daybreak 12.1 X

H2Orange2 Grout

Safe 3.81 X

Kodak Photo-Flo 7 X X X

Marble Cleaner 10.5 X X X X

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 10: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Bath National Cemetery

• Bath, NY

San Francisco National Cemetery

• San Francisco, CA

Santa Fe National Cemetery

• Santa Fe, NMAlexandria National Cemetery

• Pineville, LA

Jefferson Barracks

National Cemetery

• St. Louis, MO

Field Test Sites

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 11: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Implement Field Studies5 cleaners + water

1,440 test patches

240 stones

5 National Cemeteries

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 12: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Micro-organisms• Bacteria: can

slowly cause stone loss

• Fungi: Can change visual appearance

• Algaes: provides the most visual changes

Fungi sample found on marker in San Francisco.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 13: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Phase II (2005-2007)

• Monitor regrowthin the field for 18 months

• Evaluate cleaning effects on test stone in the lab

• Elimination: H2Orange Cleaner and Kodak PhotoFlo

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 14: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Elimination: Bath National Cemetery

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 15: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Phase III (2008-2011)

• Long-term monitoring at two sites

• Pineville and Jefferson Barracks cleaned study headstones

• Alternate laboratory study was devised at Harvard University

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 16: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Results

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 17: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Significant Findings from the Study

• Field studies showed:

– Kodak Photo-Flo was the first cleaner to fail in the field (greatest biological regrowth)

– H2Orange Safe Cleaner failed after six months at Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery (killed bacteria but left green fungi)

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 18: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Significant Findings from the Study

• Lab studies showed:– Daybreak cleaner left

significant salt deposits on stone

– D2 Biological solution left small amounts of salts on stone (pH buffer additive?)

– D2 Biological Solution was reformulated, no salts found on repeat testing with new formula

Daybreak

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 19: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Significant Findings from the Study

• Further biological studies showed:

– WEG Marble and Granite Cleaner failed after 188 days in laboratory accelerated studies.

– D2 Biological Solution performed as well as Daybreak without harmful salt residues.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 20: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

ClimaticDifferences

Semi Arid Steppe: Santa Fe

Humid Subtropical: Alexandria

Mediterranean: San Francisco

Humid Continental: Bath Jefferson Barracks

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 21: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Location Differences• Sunny areas:

Biocidal effects last much longer.

• Shady areas:

Fungal growth is more likely to return.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 22: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Issues to Consider

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 23: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Headstone Soiling

• Dirt

• Air Pollution

• Biological Organisms

• Bird Droppings

• Plant or Tree Sap

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 24: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Other Threats to Headstones

• Salt Damage

• Freeze Thaw Cycles

• Improper Cleaning

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 25: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Preservation Practices

• Use the gentlest least invasive method

• Consider long-term effects

• Minimize cleaning impacts

• Don’t remove original surface

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 26: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Cleaning known to damage stone

• Bleach and Bleach like products

• Strong acids or bases

• Power tools

• Pressure washing

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 27: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Cleaner Factors to Consider

• Manufacturer’s Recommendations

• Dilution ratio

• Dwell time

• Biocidal Cleaners

• Lightening with time

• Temporary non-permanent color changes during cleaning

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 28: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Recommended Actions

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 29: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Cleaning Recommendations

• Use D2 Biological Solution or similar biocidalcleaner, following manufacturer’s directions. Do not dilute.

• Apply to WET stone surface using a sprayer.

• Gently agitate with a soft bristle brush.

• RINSE thoroughly with water.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 30: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Cleaning Frequency Factors

• Research offers observations, but frequency of cleaning will depend on location and climate of individual cemeteries.

• Different locations will need different cleaning schedules.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 31: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Spot Cleaning

• Minimize the frequency of cleaning the entire cemetery by scheduling spot cleaning on those headstones located in shady areas that exhibit more biological growth and soiling.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote

Page 32: 2 evaluation of cleaners for government issued headstones

Summary

• Of the five cleaners tested, D2 Biological solution was most effective and left no harmful residues.

• Daybreak is a bleach solution.– Continued use of Daybreak will result in long term

damage to headstones.

• Use of high pressure power washers can erode the headstone surface and deteriorate headstone.

• Use of chemical cleaners can be successfully accomplished by a three-person team.

Draft: Do Not Use, Cite, or Quote