2. Electrodes copy - UNLcb3.unl.edu/.../uploads/sites/2/2013/12/2.-Electrodes-copy.key_.pdfNEONATE...
Transcript of 2. Electrodes copy - UNLcb3.unl.edu/.../uploads/sites/2/2013/12/2.-Electrodes-copy.key_.pdfNEONATE...
Electrode PlacementElectrode selection, placement, and number depend on test goals, subject age, task factors.No universal or “correct” system.50+ different systems used.Need to document placements, references.Speed of application important with infants, children (< 10 min. optimal)
Electrode Terms
Monopolar vs. bipolar electrode pairs“monopolar” suggests 1 electrode not active or at neutral site Irrelevant issue todayEach electrode ALWAYS compared to something when input to amplifierDifferential amplifiers compare electrode (+ input) to another electrode (- input)
Electrode Related Issues
The closer an electrode is to reference, the smaller the amplitude of the signalElectrodes detect current changes at scalp generated by structures at different sites within the brain plus muscle activity plus other artifacts
Electrode Related Issues
Electrodes may not indicate signal because:Electrode too close to reference (flat line)Dipole generating response not perpendicular to brain/scalp surfaceFilters screen out signal of interest
Common Electrode References
NoseCz (vertex)Linked mastoids or one mastoidLinked Ears or one earOff the head (e.g., back, leg)Average (preferred if many electrodes)
Reference Points
Choose your reference wisely
Choice of Reference affects dataNo “zero” activity point on a bodyAverage reference is the best approximation of zero for large number of electrodes
LinkedMastoid
Reference Effects” Choice of Reference “Changes” the Data !
RightMastoid
LeftMastoid
AverageReference
Surface Laplacian Issue1. Scalp potential shape depends on reference location.
2. Average reference partially mitigates distortion.
a. Incomplete coverage of scalp
b. Finite number of electrodes
3. Scalp distribution blurred relative to cortex by low scalp conductivity
4. Surface scalp Laplacian better approximates cortical-dura surface potentials
Current moves up until hits scalp-air boundary where it moves tangentially
Scalp surface Laplacian is proportional to the local surface divergence of the scalp current density.
Brain
Tangential current flow
BEWARE: Currents move through skull at many locations and will SUM when one current meets another.
Brain
Tangential current flow
(signalscancel)
Common Electrode Application System (Jasper, 1958)
Ten-Twenty [10-20] System: Common procedure using nasion, inion, left & right pre-auricular points; employs % distances.
Proportional placement of electrodes saves time during pediatric applications
nose
Remember: Electrode placement systems arbitrary
Sub_Num Gender Gest. Age (wks) Head Circ. (cm) Nas-Ini (cm) Mea-Mea (cm)1 f 28 28 19 162 m 30 33.5 21 203 f 30 30.5 19.5 174 f 33 33.5 20.5 19.55 f 33 30 19.5 17.56 m 33 32.5 20 20.57 m 33 33.5 19.5 208 f 35 30.5 20 189 f 35 29.5 21 18
10 m 36 34.5 19.5 2011 m 37 33 20 20.512 m 38 35 22 20.513 m 38 35 22.5 2114 f 38 35 22 2115 m 39 34.5 21 20
Variations in head sizes in neonates
Montage Strategies
Montage strategies! ! In cases where the number of
electrodes is more than the number of amplifiers available for testing ! ! Recordings can not be made
from all the electrodes all of the time.
Montage Strategies
1) Montage - different patterns of connections between electrodes and amplifiers.
2) No montage system inscribed in STONE.
! a) record between pairs of symmetrically placed electrodes;
! b) connections between anterioposterior or transverse lines;
Application - classic
1) comb hair, measure & mark positions;2) rub area with abrasive (pumice);3) clean away application material;4) apply electrolytic paste;5) apply electrode, tape;6) needle electrodes: sterilize (autoclave,
soak), then insert needle 5 mm, 1 mm depth; tape electrode to scalp.
Electrode Impedances
Low input impedance amplifiers require impedances 1-5 k OhmsHigh input impedance amplifiers tolerate well impedances 40-60 kOhms
Electrode Application
Electrode CapsMost require abrading skin with blunt needle, applying electrode paste, monitoring impedance, re-abrading skin.Pressure applied to head (tight cap, straps around chest, chin strap).Infection risk.Attrition rates with infants & young children ~ 50%; rates up to 75-80% in children with disabilities18 - 24 month olds difficult (just say, “No!”)
EGI HYDROCEL ELECTRODE NET
Advantages: Not Abraiding Scalp So No Pain Infection Risk is Minimal Rapid Application (10 Sec) Electrodes distributed Symetrically Tolerate Variations in Hair Styles
Cautionary notes: Do NOT mix different electrode net styles in same study. Some find Salt in saline itchy (dilute solution)
Geodesic Sensor Net64 Channel V2.0
For questions or additional assistance please refer to the EGI System 200 Technical Manual or contact us at:Electrical Geodesics, Inc1600 Millrace Drive, Suite 307Eugene, Oregon USA 97403Phone: (541) 687-7962 Fax: (541) 687-7963Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
For questions or additional assistance please refer to the EGI System 200 Technical Manual or contact us at:
Electrical Geodesics, Inc1600 Millrace Drive, Suite 307Eugene, Oregon USA 97403Phone: (541) 687-7962 Fax: (541) 687-7963Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
Geodesic Sensor Net256 Channel V1.0
12345
6
7
8
9
10
REF
1112
13
14
15
16
17
1819
20
21
22
23
24
25COM
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4041
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
5657
58
59
60
61
6263
6465
66
67
6869 70 71
72
7374 75 76
7778
7980
81
82
EAREAR
SER#EAR
83 8485
8687
88
89
90
91
9293 94 95
9697
9899
100
101
102
103
LM
104 105 106 107108
109
110
111
112113 114 115
116117
118
119
120
121 122123
124
125
126
127
128
134
129
130
131
132
133
135136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183184
185186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195196
197198199
200
201
202
EAR
EAR
EAR
EAR
RM
203
204
205206
207208
209
210
211
212213
214215216
226 225 224 223222
221
220
219
218
217
227228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237 238239
240
241
251252
253
254
255
256
250
249
248
247
246
245244 243
242
REF
CZ
101
Pz
COM
15387
36 224
59
C3
183
C4
21
37 18
47
F7
2
F8
116 150
17096
202
T4
69
T3
13
4
5
6
7
8
9
1011
12
13
14
15
Fz
16
17
19
Fp2
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Fp1
34
35
38
39
40
41
F3
42
43
44
45
46
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
70
7172
186
198
207
215
74
7576 77
7879
80
81
73
253
252
248
249
254
255
256
251
250
241
244
242
245
243
246
247
82
83
8485
86
P3
88
89
90
91
92
9394
LM95
T5 9798
99
100
102
103
104105
106 107108
109
110
111
112
113 114115
117
118
119
120 121 122123
124
O1
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
133134
135
136
137
Oz
138
139
140
141
142
143
145
146
147
148
149
O2
151
152
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
P4
163
164173
165
166
S/N
174
167
168
169
171
172
132144
175
176
177
178
T6
179
180
181
182
187
188
189
190
RM
191
192
193
194184185
195196
197
199
200
201
210
208
209
216
217
218
203
204205
206
214
F4
211
212213 219
220
221222
223 225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234235
236
237
238 239240
HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Net
256 Channel MapVersion 1.0
For questions or additional assistance please refer to the EGI Sensor Net Technical Manual or contact us at:
Electrical Geodesics, Inc.
1600 Millrace Drive, Suite 307
Eugene, Oregon 97403
Phone: (541) 687-7962 Fax:(541) 687-7963
Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
Electrode placement - sites & strategies used
! 1) Jasper, H.H. (1958). EEG, 10, 370.
! 2) Gibbs, F.A. & Gibbs , E.L. (1950). Atlas of
! Electroencephalography, Vol. 1: Methodology and Controls.
! Cambridge, Mass.: Addison - Wesley. p. 56.
! 3) Pampiglione, G. (1966). Proceedings of the
! Electrophysiological and Technology Association, 13, 166.
Additional References: (electrode caps, amps)
www.gtec.at www.brainproducts.com/docs/Products/braincap.htmwww.psylab.com/html/default_electrodes_transducers.htmlwww.biosemi.com/products.htmwww.EGI.com/