2 Coupling ANSYS Workbench With ModeFRONTIER

10
Coupling ANSYS Workbench with modeFRONTIER Structural optimization of a metal sheet with hole

Transcript of 2 Coupling ANSYS Workbench With ModeFRONTIER

  • Coupling ANSYS Workbench with

    modeFRONTIER

    Structural optimization of a metal sheet with hole

  • Model definition and Parameterization

    Structural analysis

    Optimization workflow

    Summary

    Optimization workflow

    Analysis of results

  • The model is a metal sheet with hole.

    The sheet is fixed constrainedalong the bottom edge

    Two distributed loads along top and right sides are applied

    Model Definition

    top and right sides are applied

  • Model parameters are: Position, dimension and

    fillet of the hole Thickness of the metal

    sheet

    Model Parameterization

  • Structural Analysis

    The mesh is automatically created by Workbench

    The distributed loads are applied on two side surfaces (100 N)

  • Optimization Workflow (modeFRONTIER)

    Design ParametersInput variables 5 geometric variables

    Output variables Maximum stress and

    displacement Mass

    Design goals Minimize maximum

    displacement Minimize mass

    Optimizations set-up dataSampling phase: Original configuration nr initial

    individuals: 16

    Exploration phase: MOGA-II scheduler 320

    iterations

  • Optimization Analysis Parallel Chart

    The Parallel Chart allows the filter of the designs in order to get the

    optimal values for both the objectives

    The set of Best Designs (Pareto frontier) can be visualized

  • Displacement is inversely correlated with mass

    Displacement is

    Optimization Analysis Correlation Chart

    Displacement is inversely proportional to thickness

    Mass is directly proportional to thickness

  • 12

    Optimization Analysis Bubble Chart

    The Bubble plot shown is a 4D view of the scatter

    It compares the design that have been investigated with respect to different objectives

    3

    Solution Compromise

    2

    Lower Max Displacement

    1

    Lower Mass Value

    3

  • Optimization Analysis Results

    Original Design Compromise Solution

    Max displacement 0.498e-7 m Max displacement 0.498 E-7 m

    Mass 0.288 Kg Mass 0.236 Kg