1Runcom Technologies Ltd. Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3...
-
Upload
luis-mcknight -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of 1Runcom Technologies Ltd. Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3...
1Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 1
OFDMA Single Channel Harmonization IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2007.21.02
Name Company Address Phone email Eli Sofer Runcom Technologies 2 Hachoma St., 75655
Rishon Lezion, Israel +972 3 9428892 [email protected]
Yossi Segal Runcom Technologies 2, achoma St. 75655 Rishon Lezion, Israel
+972 3 952 8440 [email protected]
Doron Ezri Runcom Technologies 2, achoma St. 75655 Rishon Lezion, Israel
+972 3 952 8440 [email protected]
Michael Erlichson
Runcom Technologies 2, achoma St. 75655 Rishon Lezion, Israel
+972 3 952 8440 [email protected]
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.22. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.22.
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair Carl R. Stevenson as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.22 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at [email protected].>
2Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 2
• Adequacy of CAZAC PN sequences• Attributes of PN sequences needed to support
WRAN deployment with Reuse factor 1/3• Partial simulations results on O-PUSC
3Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 3
Adequacy of proposed CAZAC scheme
• the PAPR of preamble is an important property. However, the preamble PAPR should be examined in view of the payload PAPR. That is, decreasing the Preamble PAPR beneath the expected payload PAPR would not lead to any advantage on the system level.
• The very low 1-2 dB PAPR suggested by the CAZAC approach would give almost no advantage over another series with PAPR in the vicinity of 4-5dB.
•Although the CAZAC waveforms are simple to generate (similarity to the sounding waveforms of the 802.16e) the decoding/reception complexity is extremely high. This is easy to show by means of comparison with BPSK modulated preamble. The estimation process begin with multiplying the incoming preamble (in the frequency domain) with a series of PN sequences (stored at the UT memory). Obviously, the multiplication of a digital series with a sequence of +1, -1 (BPSK) is far more attractive and simpler than the multiplication with a series of complex value numbers (suggested by CAZAC approach)
•
4Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 4
• CAZAC approach would imply a complex HW required to carryout a large number of complex multiplications ( the number is identical to number of pilots within the preamble). The negligible gain of CAZAC preamble on the system level does not justify the massive HW requirements.
• we recommend use of binary PN sequences.
Adequacy of proposed CAZAC scheme
5Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 5
Attributes of PN sequences needed to support WRAN deployment with Reuse factor 1/3 (use of aggregated channels)
6Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 6
In multi-cell deployment, the popular deployment is with Hexagon like cells. This allows the use of multiple different allocation within the cell (Reuse factor < 1) Reuse 1/3 deployment calls for decimated preamble with factor 3. This means that each segment uses a different set of pilot in Preamble (e.g. every 3n+k, K= 0,1,2). This preamble structure makes sure that the transmitted preamble by all 3 segments remain orthogonal (in the frequency domain)Simulation studies also show that in many scenarios (especially in the low CINR regime) the capacity of a cell with reuse less than 1 (e.g. 1/3) is higher than that in the elementary Reuse 1. We believe that similar deployment ideas will be predicted in the 80-2.22 standard. It is therefore important to adhere to the decimation with factor 3 for use as the 802.22 preambles.
Support for Channel aggregation
7Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 7
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
• Preamble with 3 repetitions (for three different sectors)
• 3 different Binary PN Sequences each shifted by one subcarrier (k= 0,1,2), allocated for three different sectors, supports resuse 1/3 (Aggregated channels)
• Interference mitigation among sectors, differentiation among sectors
Sub carriers
Preamble Binary PN Sequences
1 4 7 10 13 17 20 23 26 29 32
+1
-1
8Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 8
Seg
Seg Seg
Different PN sequence, each to one of the three sectors
Multicell Deployment with Reuse 1/3
• Optimized deployment and better coverage of the sector
• No interference from antenna backlobes on adjacent sectors
9Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 9
DL structure in Reuse 1/3• Each one of the three sectors of the cell has a known allocation of the subchannels for FCH.
• 4 subchannels (# 0,1,2 and 3) extending over two symbols are allocated to FCH0 (the first sector)
• 4 subchannels (#10, 11,12 and 13) extending over 2 symbols are allocated to FCH1
• 4 Subchannels (# 20, 21, 22 and 23) extending over 2 symbols are allocated to FCH2
• Each FCHx (x = 0, 1, 2) is associated with one of the three preambles, therefore the user synchronized to the preamble of a specific sector knows which subchannels are allocated to FCH associated with that sector.
• Subcarriers in each Sub-channel (UL and DL) are distributed over the entire frequency band
• No impact on OH.
10Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 10
Pre
amb
le 3
rep
s
OFDM Symbols0 1 2 3 ………
10 11 12 13 ……….…
20 21 22 23 … ……
….
FCH 2
FCH 1
FCH 0
1 2 3 4S
ub
-Ch
ann
els
DL Map
DL Map
DL Map
Major Group 0
Major Group 1
Major Group 2
UL Map
UL Map
UL Map
UL
DL structure in Reuse 1/3
11Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 11
Multicell deployment with Reuse ½ (4 sectors)
Base Station
• Poor coverage of the sector
• Opposite sector in same cell could suffer interference from antenna backlobes.
• Use of only 2 sectors or 4 sectors is not suitable for multicell deployment
• Multicell deplyment should use hexagonal cell
12Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 12
SINR CDF with Reuse 1/1
Capacity(DL) = 0.42 bps/Hz
13Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 13
SINR CDF with Reuse 1/3
Capacity(DL) = 0.71 bps/Hz
Mobility scenario
14Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 14
DL preamble and Ranging process
15Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 15
• The CDMA like synchronization is achieved by allocating several of the usable Sub-Channels for the Ranging process, the logic unit they consist is called a Ranging Sub-Channel.
• Onto the Ranging Sub-Channel users modulate a Pseudo Noise (PN) sequence using BPSK modulation
• The Base Station detects the different sequences and uses the CIR that he derives from the sequences for:
– Time and power synchronization
– Decide on the user modulation and coding
Ranging Process
16Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 16
• Subscriber Units at the Current OFDMA Symbol = 3
• Sub-Channels Allocated to Subscriber-Unit #1 = 12
• Sub-Channels Allocated to Subscriber-Unit #2 = 9
• Sub-Channels Allocated to Subscriber-Unit #3 = 6
• Number Of New Subscriber-Units Requesting Services = 3
All Subscriber-Units Suffer Different Multi-Paths and different Attenuation's
Effectiveness of DL Preamble and Ranging Example
17Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 17
• Constellation at the Base Station
18Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 18
• Users Separation
19Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 19
• User Estimation 1
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Constellation to Estiamte
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Estimated vec
Example - Results
20Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 20
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Constellation to Estiamte
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Estimated vec
• User Estimation 2
Results
21Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 21
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Constellation to Estiamte
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Estimated vec
• User Estimation 3
Results
22Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 22
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400
50
100
150
200
250
300Despreading on All Users
• Finding New Subscriber-Units Requesting Services, Using the Ranging Pilots (CDMA/OFDM Techniques)
Results
• Synchronization is achieved using DL preamble within accuracy of few micro seconds
• Preamble processing gain is 27dB, adding to that 9dB boosted pilots, overall 36dB
Time accuracy at UT (o.1 Microsecond/step)
Am
p
23Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 23
Simulations results on O-PUSC (Partial)
24Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 24
Scope
The purpose is to present performance of OPUSC scheme to various types of channel estimation methods. The simulations were ran with OPUSC frame structure for two profiles of WRAN channels.
25Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 25
Simulations parameters:• Bandwidth =6MHz.• FFTSize=2048.• FEC Size=480;• Modulation =QPSK• CTC coding.• Coding rate=1/2.• Guard Interval=256.
26Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 26
OPUSC Frame Structure
Pilot
1 OPUSC Frame
2048 subcarriers
27Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 27
Additional assumptions:
• The simulation were ran without frequency shift and without phase noise.
• Since in the OPUSC scheme the pilots in each symbol are allocated not in all subcarriers, we used linear interpolation to perform channel estimation.
28Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 28
Channel parameters:
.
0.37Hz0.17Hz2.5 Hz0.13Hz00.1 HzDoppler
frequency
-20 Db-16 Db-22 Db-7 Db0-6 DbRelative
amplitude
117420-3Excess delay,msec
Path6Path5Path4Path3Path2Path1 Profile 2
0.37Hz0.17Hz0.13Hz2.5 Hz0.1 Hz0Doppler
frequency
-19 Db-24 Db-22 Db-15 Db-7 Db0Relative
amplitude
211311830Excess delay,msec
Path6Path5Path4Path3Path2Path1Profile 1
29Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 29
Channel parameters
The point spread function(PSD) of each tap
is defined as follows:
.,)/(1
1)(
2 dopdop
dop
fffff
fS
30Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 30
Reference Performance: Profile 1 (BER)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910
-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
SNR [dB]
10-2
10-1
100 OPUSC allocation QPSK 1/2 FEC 480 Profile 1
BE
R
3 symbols9 symbols15 symbols
Perfect channel
31Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 31
Reference Performance: Profile 1 (PER)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910
-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100 OPUSC allocation QPSK 1/2 FEC 480
SNR [dB]
PE
R
3 symbols9 symbols15 symbols
Perfect channel
32Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 32
Reference Performance: Profile 2 (BER)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1010
-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100 OPUSC allocation QPSK 1/2 FEC 480 Profile 2
SNR [dB]
BE
R
3 symbols9 symbols
33Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 33
Reference Performance: Profile 2 (PER)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1010
-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100 OPUSC allocation QPSK 1/2 FEC 480 Profile 2
SNR [dB]
PE
R
3 symbols9 symbols
34Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 34
Conclusions:
• The presented graphs show us that we have BER=1e-5 with SNR=9.5. In order to improve the channel estimation we suggest to aggregate number of frames (3 and 5). From the first graph we see that the aggregation of 5 frames improves the performance in approx. 3.5Db to compare with 1 frame and is close to the perfect channel performance.
35Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 35
Water filling conceptS
NR
Threshold
Threshold
Tiles spread
Channel behavior , different users
Tiles transmission on preferred frequencies
Different thresholds for different modulation schemes and coding rates
User1User
2
36Runcom Technologies Ltd.Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom
February 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07-0000 r3
Slide 36
Conclusions
• Preamble with 3 reps is recommended (for 3 different segments), accommodating different deployment scenarios and multi-cell scenarios.
• Optional PUSC simulation results so far are poor unless used tiles are transmitted in favorable CINR.
• The concepts presented by ETRI are almost identical to the transmission scheme (US & DS) of the 802.16.e. The changes are mostly semantic. We propose to adopt the concepts presented by ETRI (not necessarily the details.