1989 Issue 1 - What is Calvinism?: Presbyterianism of the Reformers - Counsel of Chalcedon
-
Upload
chalcedon-presbyterian-church -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of 1989 Issue 1 - What is Calvinism?: Presbyterianism of the Reformers - Counsel of Chalcedon
-
8/12/2019 1989 Issue 1 - What is Calvinism?: Presbyterianism of the Reformers - Counsel of Chalcedon
1/2
of
Yahweh's sovereignty over those
who persecuted
his servant. It
is not
a
case
of
a
petty
vendetta waged against
Jeremiah's persecutors,
but
rather a
display
of
Yahweh's positive action
to
restrain the evildoers and
to
enable his
servant to
continue the task
to
which
Yahweh
had
called
him.
-Thompson
3. God's
words (vs. 16)
were
found in Jeremiah's mouth, .having
been
sovereignly placed there
by God
himself. Jeremiah did
not
question
them.
He
digested
and
proclaimed them,
and
in
his suffering, they became the
joy and
delight
of
his
heart
B.
(15:19-21)
Til
ANSWER OF
JEHOVAH
1. (15:19)
God
calls upon Jere
niiah
to
repent, a fter Jeremiah
had
been
calling
Judah to
repent.
The
bitterness
of
Jeremiah's experience
had
almost
closed
his mouth and
brought
him
close
to
abandoning his divine mission. God
calls
upon
him
to tum back
to
God
and to
renew
his trust
in him God
says:
i you utter what is precious
without uttering what is worthless, you
will be y spokesman. This is a re
buke for
questioning God's character.
2. (15:20-21)
God reafftrmS
his
promise to
Jeremiah th
at he
would
be
invincible
in
his divine calling.
a.
This
renewed promise moti
vated Jeremiah to
persevere in his mis
sion for years with renewed vigor.
b. 1lris
p r o ~
contrlns three
significant O.
T.
verbs of deliverance:
(1). save hosia), which word
stresses bringing
out of
those under op
pression into freedom.
(2). deliver hissil), which
word pictures
the
activity
of
someone
who
snatches
his
prey
from the grasp
of
a powerful captor.
(3).
redeem pada),which word
is
used in
reference to liberation
from
the possession
of
another
by the
giving
up
of
a ransom.
D
Biblical Counseling
Continued from page 19
selors whose
mes
sage and methods
are
consistent with the teachings
of
the
Bible.
Above
all, let us
who
believe
the
Bible
continue
to
counsel
from the
STUDIES IN BIBLICAL DOCTRINE
What
is Calvinism
or the Confession
of
Faith in Harmony
with the Bible and Common Sense
In
a series of dialogues between a Presbyterian
minister and a young convert
by William
D.
Smith, D.D.
DIALOGUE
XXll
Presbyterianism
of the
Reformers
Convert.-In
our
former conversa
tions I have not noticed, that among the
officers of the Presbyterian church,
you
said
anything respecting Deacons,
yet
they are frequently mentioned
in the
New
Testament;
and I fmd
, also, men
tion made of
them
in the Confession of
the
Waldenses.
They are
also,
I
believe,
in
most
Presbyterian churches that I
am
acquainted with.
Minister.--The office
of
Deacon is a
very important one,
and
should
be
found
in
every church, where circum
stances require and
admit
of it; still,
however,
it is
not an essential part of
Presbyterianism, that is, a church
may
exist,
and act
upon Presbyterian princi
ples,
in
which they are
not
found.
The
want
of
this office does
not
desrroy
its
Presbyterianism; whereas, a Presbyter
ian
church
cannot
exist without Elders.
Deacons existed
in the
synagogues, and
were
afterwards introduced
by the
apos
tles into the primitive church, as soon
as circumstances seemed to require it.
We
find
the
church
had
existed for some
time,
and
when the number of disci
ples was multiplied,;, circumstances
seemed
to
call
for the
ap
pointment
of
some,
whose
special business
it
should
be
to
attend
to the
temporal concerns
of
the church, especially to superintend
her
benevolent operations.--Acts 6. So in
every church
in
which this
part of
its
business requires much
of the
attention
Word of
God.
It is our
duty, and
God
will bless
us and our
counselees i f
we
are
faithful in performing that duty to
His glory.
of he minister and elders, i f he i r c u m ~
stances
at all admit of
it, they should
have Deacons
set over
the work, who
should be solemnly ordained by prayer
and the laying on
of
hands, in the same
way
that the other officers ~ ordained.
The
importance of the office to the
church you
can
easily perceive,
and it
shows in a very clear light the wisdom
of
the Great
Head of
the church,
in
arranging all things necessary to her
peace, comfort and prosperity. Hence,
we
find, that though the office
of
Deacon has
not
been uniformly found
in
all Presbyterian churches, yet
it
has
been generally contended for
by
those,
who
seek
entire conformity to the order
of
the primitive church.
Con.-Was Calvin the first of the
Reformers who sought to establish
Presbyterianism according to the order
of the
primitive church?
I
have thought,
that perhaps this gave rise
to
the idea,
that
he
originated it. f he was
the
first
of
the Reformers .
who
adopted it, the
more ignorant
might
conclude that
it
originated with him.
Min.--
The allegation that Presbyter
ianism originated with Calvin, has not
even that foundation. Ulric Zuingle, the
leader
of the Reformation
in
Switzer
land, who
lived
long before CalvQl, and
died before ever Calvin saw Geneva,
or
had
appeared among the prominent
Re-
formers, thus speaks on the subject of
Ruling Elders: The title of Presbyter,
or
Elder, as used
in
Scripture, is
not
[This article is reprinted,
by
p e r r n i s
sian,
from
the November,
1988
issue
of
The Presbyterian Witness]
0
P ~ e 2 2 ~
'l'he Counsel
of
Chalcedoti., January, 1989
-
8/12/2019 1989 Issue 1 - What is Calvinism?: Presbyterianism of the Reformers - Counsel of Chalcedon
2/2
rightly understood by those, who con
sider it as applicable only to those who
preside in preaching: for it is evident,
that the tennis also sometimes used to
designate Elders of another kind, that is,
Senators, Leaders, or Counselors.
Oecolampadius, whom D'Aubigne in
his history mentions
as
one of the
bright stars of the Refonnation, and
who was contemporary with Luther,
but died before Calvin came on the
stage of action, thus speaks of Ruling
Elders: But it
is evident, that those
which are here intended, are certain Se
niors or Elders, such as were in the
apostles' days, and who of old time
were called Presbuteroi whose judg
ment,
being
that of the most prudent
part of
the
church, was considered
as the
decision of the whole church. The testi
mony of Bucer, Lasco, Peter Martyr,
and others,
is
equally clear
as
to the
fact, that Presbyterianism was one of
the grand principles of the Refonnation.
Luther, himself,
in
speaking of the
Bohemian church, says: There hath not
arisen
any
people since the times of the
apostles, whose church hath come near
er to
the
apostolic doctrine and order,
than the brethren of Bohemia.* *In
the ordinary discipline of the church
they use and whereby they happily
govern the churches, they go far beyond
us, and are in this respect far more
praiseworthy. Now,
in
view
of
the fact
before stated, that the Bohemian Church
was strictly Presbyterian, the senti
ments of Luther are plain. Melancthon,
Farel, Viret and others might be added
to
the list of eminent Reformers, who
all agree on the great principles of
Presbyterianism, viz: equality of rank
among ministers, and the government
of the church by Ministers and Elders.
Calvin, when he frrst settled at
Geneva, found the church there in great
need of discipline, and for attempting to
establish a system that would exclude
gross offenders from the sealing ordi
nances of the church, he was banished
from the city and retired to Strasburg.
While
there
feeling the great want of
some regular system of church dis
cipline, he opened a correspondence
with some of the principal men of the
Bohemian church. Comenious, in his
history of the Bohemians, gives some
extracts from some of his letters, in
which he speaks in high terms of their
form of church government, as being
not only wise and wholesome, but also
in accordance with the apostolic order.
Near four years afterwards he was re
called to Geneva, and made it one of the
conditions of his accepting the pastoral
charge of
the
church, that
he
should be
permitted to have a bench of Elders, to
conduct the discipline of the church,
according to the plan in use among the
Bohemians. Thus, Presbyterianism was
established in Geneva, and became
general in the Reformed Churches
in
Switzerland, Germany, Holland, France,
Hungary, Scotland, and throughout
Europe generally, with the exception of
England.
Con. Why
was it not received and
adopted
in
England?
Min. In
the reformation from
Popery in England, the kings and
bishops mostly took the lead. To them,
as
a matter of course, the simple repub-
. licanism of the Presbyterian system
would not be agreeable. Ecclesiastical
pre-eminence had long been established,
and it is not surprising that they should
wish
to
retain it. Accordingly, while
they adopted the system
of
doctrine
taught by the Reformers generally, they
retained
many
of the features of Popery
in
their system
of
church government.
This, however, was contrary to the ex
pressed opinion of many of their most
learned and pious divines.
Not
a few of
the brightest stars of the Church of
England have given their decided
opinion in favour of Presbyterianism.
The truly venerable and pious Dr.
Owen, gives his opinion on I Tim.
5:17, in the following unequivocal lan
guage: This is a text
of
uncontrollable
evidence, if it had anything to conflict
withal, but prejudice and interest. A
rational man, who is unprejudiced, who
never heard of
the controversy about
Ruling Elders, can hardly avoid an
apprehension, that there were two sorts
of Elders, some who labour in the word
and doctrine, and some who do
not
so
do. The truth is it was interest and pre
judice which frrst caused some learned
men to strain their wits to fmd out
evasions from the evidence of this testi
mony. Being found out, some others of
meaner abilities have been entangled by
them. * There are, then, Elders
in the church. There are, or ought to be
so, in every church. With these
Elder.s
the whole rule of the church is en
trusted. All these, and only they, do
rule in it This, from
an
Independent
divine of
so
much eminence and piety
as
Dr. Owen, is
as
strong human testi
mony in favour of Presbyterianism, as
any one can wish.
Dr. Whitely bears the same testi
mony, in language equally plain.
Thorndike, Whitaker, and others, clearly
express the same opinion; and even
Archbishop Cranmer, once proposed the
introduction of Ruling Elders into the
Church of England. From all this
testimony
it
is plain, that though Pre
lacy was established in the national
church, many of her most eminent men
were in favour of Presbyterianism,
as
being in accordance with apostolic
order. I have purposely avoided quoting
the opinions of Presbyterians, because
they might
be
considered partial to their
own system. But when we find the sys
tem supported by the arguments of
Episcopalians and Independents, partiali
ty to Presbyterianism cannot be alleged.
I might add testimony, equally plain,
from many others, both Episcopalians
and Independents, but I think I have said
enough to convince you, that the order
of the Presbyterian church,
as
well
as
her doctrine, is in accordance with the
Bible and common sense, and has
received the suffrages of the wise and
good in every age. Did time permit, it
would
be
a pleasant task to trace with
you the history of the Presbyterian
church more at large. Millions of her
martyrs have sealed the truth
of
her
doctrines with their blood; and though
persecuted in every age, she still lives,
and witnesses for the truth.
But
for this
I must refer you to history.
THE END
[Editor's note- For those readers who
may not have been with us when we
began
this series of articles some two years ago, we
reiterate that Dr. William D. Smith, the
author
of
the book
from
which these chapters
were
taken,
was a Presbyterian minister
of
the mid-nineteenth century
n
America.]
The Counsel
of
Chalcedon, January, 1989 Page 23