1/8/991 Distributed Computing Support Models YCliff Frost QUniversity of California, Berkeley...
-
Upload
matilda-lamb -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1/8/991 Distributed Computing Support Models YCliff Frost QUniversity of California, Berkeley...
1/8/99 Cornell University 1
Distributed Computing Support Models
Cliff Frost University of California, Berkeley
Director of Communication and Network Services
Annie Stunden Cornell University
Director of Academic Technology Services
CSG - January 8, 1999
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 2
Distributed Support Models
Cliff Frost
Director, Communication & Network Services
UC Berkeley
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 3
History 1979One mainframe, 6 minis
One consulting office, one phone #Dozen or so consultants
Some GeneralistsSome Specialists
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 4
History 1989
Two (or so) mainframesThousands of network nodes
Single consulting office eliminatedMultiple phone #s for help
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 6
Today 1999Still no single consulting office More fragmented than everHelp Desks tend to be System or
Application specific
Still, useful things have evolved...
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 7
Today (examples) (still 1999)
“Mainframe” help: supplied by group supporting system
Financial System Help: ‘Functional’ consultants vs ‘System’ consultants
Student System help: Graduate or Undergrad???
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 8
Today (egs cont) (still 1999)
Dial-in & Email help:Student: Drop-in peer consulting officeStaff: email to drmicro or phone (10-12
and 2-4 Mon-Fri)Faculty: email and dial-in any time to
staff offices$3/mth/acct from modem service $
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 9
Today (egs cont) (still 1999)
Desktop:DOCS (Pay as you go)Central support available for ~$650/yr
• little application help
L&S has similar service w/app helpHire someoneOutsource to local vendor
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 10
Today (still 1999)
Several Informal Staff Groups:micronetnovnetusagwebnetcomp-mgrs
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 11
Today (still 1999)
A Couple of Formal Staff Groups:ASSCS
• Web Steering Committee• Student/Administrative Services
ITATF• DHAA Task Force• Security Task Force• etc
1/8/99 University of California, Berkeley 12
Comments ITATF gives formal, effective path
for input from department staffASSCS gives path for top
AdministratorsCheap (but NOT free) modems
solved problemDollars for Desktop support works
1/8/99 Cornell University 14
Challenge three years ago
Build a distributed support model Additional funding = $0
1/8/99 Cornell University 15
Review of what was
Rump groups CCD’s - campus computing directors Net-admins Met periodically Used mailing lists
Numbers About 250 people in central org - CIT Another 250 computing folks “out there” (as identified by title) Unknown number of other folks with different titles
1/8/99 Cornell University 16
Three years ago
Not a lot of friendliness between central and department folks
Clearly - there already was distributed support Not orderly Not consistent Not formalized Not related to central initiatives
1/8/99 Cornell University 17
So, what did we want?
A way for support providers to communicate with the central organization
A way for central folks to communicate to the department folks
A way to leverage central and distributed resources - collaborative working arrangements
Better relationships - between and among us all
1/8/99 Cornell University 18
Why??
Major administrative implementation - distributing responsibility - department buy-in and support critical t success
Way to gain acceptance of guidelines and policies Reasonably consistent network environment Share the workload
1/8/99 Cornell University 19
How do we move toward this?
Become more people friendly - simple but true. This means giving up the attitude that “we know best”.
Worked to be welcomed to CCD meetings (rather than specifically excluded)
Encouraged the troops to attend the net-admin meetings Volunteered to be part of programs
1/8/99 Cornell University 20
And more formally?
Set up an information technology officers council. Prepared a proposal about what and who Guideline and standard setting group Key person in each school responsible for many
IT related functions Asked Dean’s to appoint an associate Dean Dean’s made assignments reluctantly
1/8/99 Cornell University 21
Brought these people together (letter from Provost)
Not eager to participate Not really willing to contribute - puzzled about
why they were there (with a couple of exceptions) Somewhat contentious Not going anywhere (in my mind, at least not
quickly)
1/8/99 Cornell University 22
Cornell VPIT left Called one more meeting Thought it was awful and just let it fade
away However keep a mailing list where
periodically send out relevant information
1/8/99 Cornell University 23
Go, Team 2K!!
No ITO Council - let’s try something else Proposal to develop a formal group of the
lead IT folks in the schools Lead folks identified by the folks that had
been identified as ITOs Tried to go with one key person per school
(again trying to get attention paid to IT stuff at highest level in schools)
1/8/99 Cornell University 24
Ended up with a couple of key folks in the large schools
Brought these folks together - first focus - what was needed in schools and departments to make new admin systems work - real work to do
Group jelled - meets monthly - real information sharing forum
1/8/99 Cornell University 25
After a while, extended to folks beyond schools - to key admin departments too
Challenge is research centers - too many folks who see themselves as key in the centers
This group on a role in terms of making things work across campus, across organizations
1/8/99 Cornell University 26
Sample Meeting AgendaAugust 1998
Year 2k update COLTS II (Cornell on-line time system) Miscellaneous updates
AppleTalk demise discussion Upgrade to modem pool Follow up on outstanding site license questions First campus-wide support provider meeting
1/8/99 Cornell University 27
Campus-wide support providers group
Used existing net-admin group as core of this Based on relationships established, had been
asked to manage the mailing list Lots happening before the fall semester began,
good time to try to get folks in a room Set up an agenda - invited folks (a couple of
hundred) to a lunch meeting. Bought pizza - lots of it
1/8/99 Cornell University 28
More than 200 folks showed up - from central organizations and from schools and departments
This was coordinated and led by the central help desk manager
Discussed some similar to Team 2K agenda Folks asked that this be regular - agreed to
participate in agenda setting - and said would come without pizza.
1/8/99 Cornell University 29
Technology tools that make this work Bear Access - delivered with new
infrastructure last summer. Great campus participation in test - and ongoing debugging
CBT - Folks feel they are really getting a service from us as a result of this contract - and lots of folks are getting smarter
Electronic mailing lists; no more secrets; tell stuff folks early; hear stuff early
1/8/99 Cornell University 30
New services that have made us more relevant
Site license coordination - including bringing in MS Select
Putting in place good pricing for hardware - (Dell deal resulted in store negotiating better prices with other vendors too)
CBT - and collaboration with other campus trainers
Technology forums
1/8/99 Cornell University 31
Important Collaborations
Bear Access COLTS Hardware guidelines Building technology spaces Project 2000 (P2K)
1/8/99 Cornell University 32
Central Services for Constituents
Undergrads (except in specific schools such as Hotel School) Help desk Res-net support Dial-in support Public labs Personal web space Training
1/8/99 Cornell University 33
For faculty- Academic technology center - support for teaching and
learning Some schools do similar work Some schools have complementary services What’s our relationship with Office of Distance Learning and
their work with faculty?• Itchy, sometimes collaborative, sometimes combative, not really
resolved.
No real support for researchers No support for UNIX users
1/8/99 Cornell University 34
Administrators Don’t provide hands on productivity products
training anymore Help desk as first and last resort Enhanced support/relationships with end-user
support providers
1/8/99 Cornell University 35
Do we need more? Levels of support very different in different
places. CS has a substantial and talented IT group School of Art, Architecture and Planning - has one
person - and we provided seed money for this hire. College of Arts and Science has a few central
folks - relations with department folks within the college vary - and department support levels range from nil to hearty.
1/8/99 Cornell University 36
Do we have a structure that works?
Sort of. It works better than it did. There are still folks out there who want to
pretend there is no central organization or central services.
We are getting better about being collaborative - about inviting folks to dance.
1/8/99 Cornell University 37
As a result, work is less redundant - and we are probably saving the campus money.
It’s easier to implement best practices campus-wide
Necessary folks are on-board for big initiatives.
1/8/99 Cornell University 38
Holes
A service to manage local area networks and servers
Security officer - an empty slot right now Those departments where more support for
helping folks keep their machines working
1/8/99 Cornell University 39
Filling the holes
All it takes is money (Campus is ready to work collaboratively;
funds needed to put in place some missing resources and services).