UC Berkeley School of Law certifies that this activity has been approved by the State Bar of California for 13.75 hours Continuing Legal Education credit, including 1.0 hour in Legal Ethics and 1.0 hour in Elimination of Bias.

W W W. APLISV.ORG

18TH ANNUAL BERKELEY - STANFORD

ADVANCED PATENT L AW

INSTITUTESILICON VALLEY

DECEMBER 14 & 15, 2017COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM

MOUNTAIN VIEW, C A

- 2 -

w w w . a p l i s v . o r g

T H U R S DAY M O R N I N G , D E C E M B E R 14 , 2 0 17

P R E S I D I N G O F F I C E R : G. HOPKINS GUY, III, BAKER BOTTS LLP

8 : 0 0 A . M . R E G I S T R A T I O N O P E N S

CONTINENTA L BR E A K FA S T SPON SOR ED BY:

8 : 5 0 A . M . W E L C O M I N G R E M A R K S

9 : 0 0 A . M . 1 . 0 0 H R

§101 UPDATEThis panel will discuss how to navigate subject matter patentability in the PTO and the courts, the variance in how Sec. 101 is applied procedurally and substantively, and the status of proposed legislation. It will also discuss the impact of 101 on patent portfolio management.

Moderator:LEE VAN PELT, Van Pelt, Yi, and James LLPPanelists:HEIDI KEEFE, Cooley LLPDEANNA KWONG, Hewlett Packard EnterprisePETER MENELL, UC Berkeley Law School, BCLTCHRISTOPHER J. PALERMO, Hickman Palermo Becker Bingham LLP

1 0 : 0 0 A . M . 1 . 0 0 H R

VENUEThe Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland has fundamentally changed the patent litigation landscape in district courts throughout the country. This panel will focus on strategic considerations that are now raised in selecting and challenging venue.

KATHI VIDAL, Winston & Strawn LLPJARED BOBROW, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPCHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Hogan LovellsMICHAEL SACKSTEDER, Fenwick & West LLP

1 1 : 0 0 A . M . 1 5 M I N U T E B R E A K

1 1 : 1 5 A . M . 1 . 0 H R

DAMAGESInfringement, validity, and procedural maneuvering are all fine and good, but the reason businesses care about patent litigation is the money. This panel will draw on the experience of both outside and in-house counsel to explore damages issues, including apportionment, enhanced damages, and the impact of evolving local rules on damages.

Moderator:GREG PINSONNE AULT, LitiNomicsPanelists:KAREN BOYD, Turner BoydTINA CHAPPELL, IntelSONAL MEHTA, Durie TangriLEAH WATERLAND, Cisco

THURSDAY AFTERNOON, DECEMBER 14, 2017

P R E S I D I N G O F F I C E R : CHRIS BYRNE, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

1 2 : 1 5 P. M . L U N C H

L U N C H S P O N S O R E D B Y :

1 2 : 4 5 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

LUNCH KE YNOTE: INTERVIE W WITH MICHELLE LEEBijal Vakil will discuss with Michelle Lee her experience as head of the PTO and her thoughts on the future of the U.S. patent system.

MICHELLE LEE, Former Director, USPTOBIJAL VAKIL, White & Case LLP

1 : 1 5 P . M . 0 . 7 5 H R

INTERNATIONAL DE VELOPMENT S AND S TR ATEGYThis session will consider a range of international issues, including the status

of Europe’s Unified Patent Court and its impact on strategy for patent procurement, enforcement, and defense, as well as the significance of Asia and alternative venues.

STEVEN CARLSON, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLPFREDDY THIEL, Kilburn Strode LLPLAURA STORTO, Genentech

2 : 0 0 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

FR AND/SEPSThis session will examine issues implicated by FRAND and SEPs, including royalty stacking, IP BOMS, patent pools, and recent judicial decisions on FRAND obligations, defenses, and remedies.

MIKE LEE, GoogleLISA NGUYEN, Latham & Watkins LLP

2 : 3 0 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

INDEMNIFIC ATIONUsing an interactive approach, our panelists will walk through the key issues in indemnifications, the key trade-offs in negotiations, and how the issues play out in response to assertions and litigation.

ISABELLA FU, MicrosoftDAVID SIMON, Salesforce

3 : 0 0 P . M . 1 5 M I N U T E B R E A K

3 : 1 5 P . M . 0 . 7 5 H R

THE PATENT MARKE T SThis panel will discuss the current state of the secondary patent market, who’s buying, who’s selling, and at what price? It will look at what happens to patents after a sale, including the chance of winning on a bought patent. It will examine both stand-alone sales and the relatively invisible marketplace in which patents contribute significant value to a deal, including M&As, technology spinouts, JV’s, tech-transfers, and exclusive field-of-use licenses.

RON LAURIE, Inflexion Point Strategy, LLCKENT RICHARDSON, Richardson Oliver

18TH ANNUAL BERKELE Y - STANFORDA D V A N C E D P AT E N T L A W I N S T I T U T E

SILICON VALLE Y

4 : 0 0 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

§102 /103This session will provide a comprehensive review of recent decisions on Sections 102 and 103, including an analysis of the “effective filing date” and what counts as prior art under the “new” 102 provision.

BETTY CHEN, Fish & Richardson

4 : 3 0 P . M . 1 . 0 0 H R

JUDGES PANELJudges experienced in presiding over patent disputes will offer insights on patent trial and litigation issues in light of the rapidly evolving patent law landscape.Moderator: VERN WINTERS, Sidley Austin LLPPanelists:HON. JAMES DONATO, USDC, Northern District of CaliforniaHON. SUSAN DAVIS WIGENTON, USDC, District of New JerseyAdditonal judges to be announced

5 : 3 0 P . M . C L O S I N G R E M A R K S

FRIDAY MORNING, DECEMBER 15, 2017

P R E S I D I N G O F F I C E R : HARRISON J. (BUZZ) FRAHN, SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

8 : 0 0 A . M . C O N T I N E N T A L B R E A K F A S T

CONTINENTAL BRE AKFA S T SPONSORED BY:

8 : 3 0 A . M . 1 . 5 0 H R

P TAB PR AC TICE AND S TR ATEGYWhat do petitioners and patent owners need to know in an era of tapering institution and claim cancellation rates and in view of increasingly aggressive Federal Circuit review?

HARPER BATTS, Baker Botts LLPDAVID O’BRIEN, Haynes & Boone LLPTERRY REA, Crowell & Morning LLPWINSLOW TAUB, Covington & Burling LLP

1 0 : 0 0 A . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

DEBATE: IS THE P TAB CONS TITUTIONAL?Oil States is arguably the most important patent law case of the decade. The question in the case is whether the IPR proceeding created in the America Invents Act is unconstitutional because only juries, or at least Article III courts, can lawfully cancel patents. The implications could go beyond IPRs. This debate-style panel will preview some of arguments likely to be considered by the Supreme Court.

DMITRY KARSHTEDT, George Washington University Law SchoolBRIAN MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster

1 0 : 3 0 A . M . 1 5 M I N U T E B R E A K

1 0 : 4 5 A . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

THOSE PRODUCTS FLEW IN FROM ABROAD, ARE YOUR PATENTS EXHAUSTED?The Supreme Court’s holding in Impression Products v. Lexmark disrupted a multitude of sales and licensing models built on decades of Federal Circuit case law concerning the exhaustion doctrine. This presentation will navigate effective offensive and defensive litigation strategies in light of the new post-Lexmark rules. Structures for licensing and product sales to avoid post-Lexmark exhaustion will also be addressed.

YAR CHAIKOVSKY, Paul Hastings LLP

1 1 : 1 5 A . M . 0 . 7 5 H R

BUSINESS PL ANNING AROUND CHANGES IN THE L AWThis panel will consider the relationship among Supreme Court patent law decisions, business strategy, and in-house legal planning: how have businesses responded? For example, after Lexmark, does a company change its strategy on sales abroad, or on manufacture abroad? Could TC Heartland cause businesses to rethink where they locate their facilities? Have Alice and the near death of business method (and medical diagnostic?) patents affected corporate and legal planning?

MARTA BECKWITH, PacTech LawDAN LANG, Cisco

F R I D AY A F T E R N O O N , D E C E M B E R 1 5 , 2 0 1 7

1 2 : 0 0 P . M . L U N C H

L U N C H S P O N S O R E D B Y :

1 : 0 0 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R E T H I C S

PRIVILEGE IN MULTINATIONAL LITIGATIONSMost significant IP litigations now involve an international dimension, such as concurrent litigation of counterpart patents in multiple jurisdictions. Yet privilege and work product rules may differ significantly between these jurisdictions, and maintaining privilege will likely require compliance with varying privilege requirements. This session will discuss differences in the rules between the major jurisdictions, as well as strategies to maintain attorney-client, work product, and common interest privileges where litigations have international components.

KEITH SLENKOVICH, WilmerHale

1 : 3 0 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R E T H I C S

DISCLOSURES IN PROSECUTION AND LITIGATIONThis session will first describe the different disclosure obligations in prosecution and post-grant review and compare and contrast them. Then it will analyze how concurrent prosecution, post-grant proceedings, and litigation can create traps for the unwary.

DAVID HRICIK, Mercer University School of Law

2 : 0 0 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

PATENT YE AR IN RE VIE WA summary of the most important developments in Supreme Court and Federal Circuit law this year.

MARK LEMLEY, Stanford Law School

2 : 3 0 P . M . 1 5 M I N U T E B R E A K

- 3 -

w w w . a p l i s v . o r g

- 4 -

w w w . a p l i s v . o r g

2 : 4 5 P . M . 0 . 5 0 H R

IDENTIFYING TRADE SECRETS IN LITIGATIONUniquely among IP rights, trade secrets are not defined until they are litigated. Existing procedures can consume enormous resources as the parties fight over an omnibus list of claimed secrets. This session will explore practical case management techniques directed at identifying the secrets that matter.

JIM POOLEY, Orrick

3 : 1 5 P . M . 1 . 0 0 H R

ELIMINATION OF BIA SDespite the $8 billion spent annually by corporations to eliminate bias and increase diversity and inclusion, the needle hasn’t moved much. Numerous studies have shown that although unconscious bias training is a great tool for creating awareness, it doesn’t have a significant effect in changing behaviors. So, what does work? This session will examine recent behavioral research, ROI findings, and first-hand experiences regarding the tools, strategies, programs, and policies that are seemingly making a positive impact.

Moderator: MALLUN YEN, ChIPs Network Inc. Panelists:PAUL GREWAL, FacebookCAREN ULRICH STACY, Diversity LabSARITA VENKAT, Apple

4 : 1 5 P . M . C L O S I N G R E M A R K S

Christopher Palermo, Hickman Palermo

Becker Bingham LLP

James Pampinella, Navigant

Rajiv Patel, Fenwick & West LLP

Greg Pinsonneault, LitiNomics

Ashok Ramani, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP

Gabriel Ramsey, Orrick

Sasha Rao, Maynard Cooper & Gale

Teresa Rea, Crowell & Moring LLP

Gwilym Roberts, Kilburn & Strode LLP

Neal Rubin, RPX Corp

David Simon, Salesforce

Maya Skubatch, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &

Rosati

Keith Slenkovich, WilmerHale

Winslow Taub, Covington & Burling LLP

Bijal Vakil, White & Case LLP

Lee Van Pelt, Van Pelt, Yi & James LLP

Katherine Vidal, Winston & Strawn LLP

Vern Winters, Sidley Austin LLP

Mallun Yen, ChIPs Network Inc.

PL ANNING COMMIT TEE

Mark Lemley, CO-CHAIR; Stanford Law School, Durie TangriJames Dempsey, CO-CHAIR; BCLT, Berkeley Law

* * *

Adam Alper, Kirkland & Ellis LLP

Edward Anderson, Sheppard Mullin

Robert Barr, Gunderson Dettmer

Harper Batts, Baker Botts LLP

Bradley Baugh, North Weber & Baugh LLP

Marta Beckwith, PacTech Law

David Bloch, Winston & Strawn LLP

Jared Bobrow, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Karen Boyd, Turner Boyd LLP

Christopher Byrne, Samsung

Steven Carlson, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP

Yar Chaikovsky, Paul Hastings LLP

Tina Chappell, Intel Corporation

Betty Chen, Fish & Richardson

Colleen Chien, Santa Clara Law

Michael De Vries, Kirkland & Ellis LLP

Michael Esposito, Blue Moon Software

Mark Flanagan, WilmerHale

William Gaede, McDermott Will & Emery

William Galliani, Cooley LLP

Michael Headley, Fish & Richardson

Julie Holloway, Latham & Watkins LLP

Richard Hung, Morrison Foerster LLP

Matthias Kamber, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP

Heidi Keefe, Cooley LLP

David Killough, Microsoft Corp.

Noreen Krall, Apple Inc.

Deanna Kwong, Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Dan Lang, Cisco

Ronald Laurie, Inflexion Point Strategy

Louise Lee, ChIPs Network Inc.

Mike Lee, Google

Christian Mammen, Hogan Lovells

David McCombs, Haynes & Boone LLP

Sonal Mehta, Durie Tangri

Peter Menell, BCLT, Berkeley Law

Suzanne Michel, Google Inc.

Shayne O’Reilly, Kilpatrick Townsend &

Stockton LLP

REGISTR ATIONR E G I S T E R O N L I N E

Whether you are paying by credit card or check, you must register

online. Speakers and Moderators are also required to register online

to answer key scheduling questions and initial the “authorization

to publish” your slides and the audio recordings of the event.

www.aplisv.orgR E G I S T R A T I O N R A T E S

Earlybird Registration (by November 17) ......................................................$890

Regular Registration (by December 11 at 10 AM) .......................................$990

Late Registration* (after December 11 at 10 AM)...................................... $1200*on a space available basis

G R O U P R E G I S T R A T I O N D I S C O U N T ( R E G I S T E R O N L I N E )

10% off for 5 or more people from the same organization

C A N C E L L A T I O N P O L I C Y

Refunds (full cost, less $100 cancellation fee) available for paid

registrations cancelled in writing to aplisv@law.berkeley.edu by

December 1. No refunds after December 1.

You may substitute a different person by writing to aplisv@law.berkeley.edu

by December 11.

@BerkeleyLawBCLT

@StanfordLaw

#APLISV

LOGISTICS

C O N F E R E N C E L O C A T I O N :

COMPUTER HIS TORY MUSEUM1401 N. Shoreline BlvdMountain View, CA

Parking:Parking at the Computer History Museum is free.

H O T E L R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :

HOTEL AVANTE860 E. El Camino RealMountain View, CA

To make your room reservation, please contact the hotel directly: Phone: (885) 880-1245Email: reservations@jdvhotels.com

Availability is limited and the room block expires on Monday, November 13. Please request a room in the “UC BERKELEY” room block to secure the proper rate of $209/night.

Parking:Parking at Hotel Avante is complimentary.

K E Y D A T E S :

NOVEMBER 17Last day for early registration

DECEMBER 1Last day for refunds (full cost, less $100 cancellation fee)

DECEMBER 11Last day to substitute names of attendees

DECEMBER 11 AT 10 AMLast chance for regular registration

AF TER DECEMBER 11 AT 10 AMRegistrations will be accepted at a higher rate on a space available basis. Walk-up registrations may not be available.

DECEMBER 14Institute begins

Q U E S T I O N S :

Email: aplisv@law.berkeley.eduPhone: 510.642.4712

- 5 -

w w w . a p l i s v . o r g

THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS

NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION

U.S. PostagePAID

University of California

18TH ANNUAL BERKELE Y - STANFORDA D V A N C E D P A T E N T L A W I N S T I T U T E

SILICON VALLE Y

B E R K E L E Y C E N T E R F O R L A W & T E C H N O L O G YU C B E R K E L E Y S C H O O L O F L A W4 2 1 B O A LT H A L LB E R K E L E Y , C A 9 4 7 2 0 -7 2 0 0

RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED

B N A . C O M H I C K M A N P A L E R M O . C O M

L I T I N O M I C S . C O M I P - S T R A T E G Y . C O M