15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

19
15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J Shortest Paths 2: Bucket implementations of Dijkstra’s Algorithm R-Heaps

description

15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J. Shortest Paths 2: Bucket implementations of Dijkstra’s Algorithm R-Heaps. A Simple Bucket-based Scheme. Let C = 1 + max(c ij : (i,j) ∈ A); then nC is an upper bound on the minimum length path from 1 to n. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Page 1: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Shortest Paths 2: Bucket implementations of Dijkstra’s Algorithm

R-Heaps

Page 2: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

2

A Simple Bucket-based Scheme

Let C = 1 + max(cij : (i,j) ∈ A); then nC is an upper bound on the minimum length path from 1 to n.

RECALL: When we select nodes for Dijkstra's Algorithm we select them in increasing order of distance from node 1.

SIMPLE STORAGE RULE. Create buckets from 0 to nC.

Let BUCKET(k) = {i ∈ T: d(i) = k}. Buckets are sets of nodes stored as doubly linked lists. O(1) time for insertion and deletion.

Page 3: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

3

Dial’s Algorithm Whenever d(j) is updated, update the buckets so

that the simple bucket scheme remains true.

The FindMin operation looks for the minimum non-empty bucket.

To find the minimum non-empty bucket, start where you last left off, and iteratively scan buckets with higher numbers.

Dial’s Algorithm

Page 4: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

4

Running time for Dial’s Algorithm C = 1 + max(cij : (i,j) ∈ A).

Number of buckets needed. O(nC)

Time to create buckets. O(nC)

Time to update d( ) and buckets. O(m)

Time to find min. O(nC).

Total running time. O(m+ nC).

This can be improved in practice; e.g., the space requirements can be reduced to O(C).

Page 5: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

5

Additional comments on Dial’s Algorithm Create buckets when needed. Stop creating

buckets when each node has been stored in a bucket.

Let d* = max {d*(j): j N}. Then the maximum ∈bucket ever used is at most d* + C.

Suppose j Bucket( d* + C + 1) after update(i). ∈But then d(j) = d(i) + cij ≤ d* + C

d* d*+1

j

d*+2 d*+3 d*+C d*+C+1

Page 6: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

A 2-level bucket scheme

Have two levels of buckets.Lower buckets are labeled 0 to K-1 (e.g., K = 10)Upper buckets all have a range of K. First upper

bucket’s range is K to 2K – 1.Store node j in the bucket whose range contains d(j).

6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99

2

1 1distance label 3 21

5

Page 7: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Find Min FindMin consists of two subroutines

SearchLower: This procedure searches lower buckets from left to right as in Dial’s algorithm. When it finds a non-empty bucket, it selects any node in the bucket.

SearchUpper: This procedure searches upper buckets from left to right. When it finds a bucket that is non-empty, it transfers its elements to lower buckets.

7

FindMin

If the lower buckets are non-empty, then SearchLower;Else, SearchUpper and then SearchLower.

Page 8: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

More on SearchUpper SearchUpper is carried out when the lower

buckets are all empty.

When SearchUpper finds a non-empty bucket, it transfers its contents to lower buckets. First it relabels the lower buckets.

8

10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

4

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

35

333

530

454

2-Level Bucket

Algorithm

Page 9: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Running Time Analysis Time for SearchUpper: O(nC/K)

O(1) time per bucket Number of times that the Lower Buckets are filled

from the upper buckets: at most n. Total time for FindMin in SearchLower

O(nK); O(1) per bucket scanned. Total Time for scanning arcs and placing nodes in

the correct buckets: O(m) Total Run Time: O(nC/K + nK + m).

Optimized when K = C.5 O(nC.5 + m)

9

Page 10: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

More on multiple bucket levels Running time can be improved with three or

more levels of buckets.

Runs great in practice with two levels

Can be improved further with buckets of range (width) 1, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 …Radix Heap Implementation

10

Page 11: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

11

A Special Purpose Data Structure RADIX HEAP: a specialized implementation of

priority queues for the shortest path problem.

A USEFUL PROPERTY (of Dijkstra's algorithm): The minimum temporary label d( ) is monotonically non-decreasing. The algorithm labels node in order of increasing distance from the origin.

C = 1 + max length of an arc

Page 12: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

12

Radix Heap Example

1

2 4

53

6

13

5

2

8

15

20

90

0 1 2-3 4-7 8-15 16-31 32-63

Buckets: bucket sizes grow exponentially

ranges change dynamically

Radix Heap Animation

Page 13: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Analysis: FindMin Scan from left to right until there is a non-empty

bucket. If the bucket has width 1 or a single element, then select an element of the bucket. Time per find min: O(K), where K is the

number of buckets

13

0 1 2-3 4-7 8-15 16-31 32-63

24

5

Page 14: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Analysis: Redistribute Range Redistribute Range: suppose that the minimum

non-empty bucket is Bucket j. Determine the min distance label d* in the bucket. Then distribute the range of Bucket j into the previous j-1 buckets, starting with value d*.Time per redistribute range: O(K). It takes

O(1) steps per bucket.Time for determining d*: see next slide.

14

0 1 2-3 4-7 8-15 16-31 32-63

24

5

9 10 11-12 13-15

d(5) = 9 (min label)

Page 15: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Analysis: Find min d(j) for j in bucket Let b the the number of items in the minimum

bucket. The time to find the min distance label of a node in the bucket is O(b).Every item in the bucket will move to a lower

index bucket after the ranges are redistributed.

Thus, the time to find d* is dominated by the time to update contents of buckets.

We analyze that next

15

Page 16: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Analysis: Update Contents of Buckets When a node j needs to move buckets, it will

always shift left. Determine the correct bucket by inspecting buckets one at a time.O(1) whenever we need to scan the bucket to

the left.For node j, updating takes O(K) steps in total.

16

0 1 2-3 4-7 8-15 16-31 32-63

24

9 10 11-12 13-15

d(5) = 9

5

Page 17: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

Running time analysis FindMin and Redistribute ranges

O(K) per iteration. O(nK) in total Find minimum d(j) in bucket

Dominated by time to update nodes in buckets Scanning arcs in Update

O(1) per arc. O(m) in total. Updating nodes in Buckets

O(K) per node. O(nK) in total Running time: O(m + nK)

O(m + n log nC) Can be improved to O(m + n log C)

17

Page 18: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

18

Summary Simple bucket schemes: Dial’s Algorithm

Double bucket schemes: Denardo and Fox’s Algorithm

Radix Heap: A bucket based method for shortest pathbuckets may be redistributedsimple implementation leads to a very good

running timeunusual, global analysis of running time

Page 19: 15.082J & 6.855J & ESD.78J

MITOpenCourseWarehttp://ocw.mit.edu

15.082J / 6.855J / ESD.78J Network OptimizationFall 2010

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.