1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...
Transcript of 1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review ...
1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review of syllabus Semester
wise /year wise
INDEX
Sr. No. Particular Page No.
1 Blank feedback forms of stakeholders 2-5
2 Sample Filled feedback forms of parents 6-10
3 Sample Filled feedback forms of Alumni 11-15
4 Sample Filled feedback forms of Teachers 16-20
5 Sample Filled feedback forms of Students 21-25
1
Priyadarshini College of Engineering
Session 2017-18
Parents Feedback on Curriculum
Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.
Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor
1 Rate the learning experience gained by the ward
through curriculum of the course
2 Rate the competency of the curriculum with respect to
other Universities
3 Rate the relevance of curriculum to the program
4 Rate the incorporation of recent changes of technology
in the curriculum
5 Satisfaction level of curriculum design as per the
requirement of employability / Higher Learning.
Suggestions for further Improvement
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Name & Signature
2
Priyadarshini College of Engineering
Session 2017-18
Alumni Feedback on Curriculum.
Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.
Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor
1 Curriculum meets prerequisite and basic
knowledge required for the career.
2 Usefulness of learning experience in career.
3 Electives offered in relation to the
technological advancements.
4 The new courses (subjects) Introduced meet
contemporary (existing) requirements.
5 Design of the courses (subjects) encourages /
motivates extra learning or self learning.
Suggestions for further Improvement.
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Name and Address of Alumni:
3
Priyadarshini College of Engineering
Session 2017-18
Teachers Feedback on Curriculum
Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.
Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor
1 The learning objectives are clear and appropriate
to the program.
2 The curriculum and syllabus are well organized
and suitable to the program.
3 The text Books/Reference Books are well suited
to the course.
4 The system followed by the university for the
design and development of curriculum is
effective.
5 Provision to update curriculum time to time.
6 How do you rate the distribution of contact hours
among the course components?
7 The curriculum has a good balance between theory
and practical.
8 How do you rate the electives offered in relation
to the technological advancements.
Suggestions for further Improvement.
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Name and signature of teacher:
4
Priyadarshini College of Engineering
Session 2017-18
Students Feedback on Curriculum
Rate the Particulars by putting tick mark in appropriate cell.
Sr.No. Particulars High Moderate Poor
1 The sequence of the courses (subjects) in the
curriculum
2 Size of syllabus in terms of the load on the
student.
3 The objectives stated for each of the course.
4 The offering of the electives in terms of their
relevance to the specialized streams.
5 How do you rate the electives offered in relation
to the technological advancements.
6 Content of the courses encourages extra learning
/ self learning.
7 How do you rate the percentage (Number) of
courses having practical components?
8 How do you rate the domain used for
Designing/performing the experiments in the
laboratory.
Suggestions for further Improvement
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Name of Student (Optional):
Semester: